Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
2009/7/10 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com: On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits? mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 needs glibc.i686 libdrm.i586 libdrm-devel.i586 nss-softokn-freebl.i586 pulseaudio-module-x11.x86_64 needs alsa-lib.i586 dbus-libs.i586 e2fsprogs-libs.i586 flac.i586 gdbm.i586 glibc.i586 libICE.i586 libSM.i586 libX11.i586 libXau.i586 libXext.i586 libXtst.i586 libasyncns.i586 libattr.i586 libcap.i586 libgcc.i586 libogg.i586 libsndfile.i586 libstdc++.i586 libxcb.i586 ncurses-libs.i586 nss-softokn-freebl.i586 pulseaudio-libs.i586 pulseaudio-utils.i586 readline.i586 sqlite.i586 tcp_wrappers-libs.i586 I'm pretty sure you're looking at it wrong. [s...@velociraptor devel]$ rpm -q mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 --requires /usr/bin/pkg-config libGL.so.1()(64bit) libX11-devel mesa-libGL = 7.5-0.14.fc11 pkgconfig(dri2proto) = 1.99.3 pkgconfig(libdrm) = 2.4.3 pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xdamage) pkgconfig(xext) pkgconfig(xfixes) pkgconfig(xxf86vm) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 [s...@velociraptor devel]$ rpm -q pulseaudio-module-x11.x86_64 --requires /bin/sh config(pulseaudio-module-x11) = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXtst.so.6()(64bit) libasyncns.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libltdl.so.7()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) liboil-0.3.so.0()(64bit) libprotocol-native.so()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpulse.so.0()(64bit) libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit) libpulsecommon-0.9.16.so()(64bit) libpulsecore-0.9.16.so()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libsamplerate.so.0()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) libspeexdsp.so.1()(64bit) libtdb.so.1()(64bit) libwrap.so.0()(64bit) pulseaudio = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 pulseaudio-utils = 0.9.16-2.test2.fc12 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) I also found dupllicates of NetworkManager x86_64 and .i586 and others. I wanted some -devel packages but I thought only the x86_64 versions would be pulled in. How have this happened? Not sure how you managed it, but the packages themselves are correct. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list I don't know but when I try to install one of those x86_64 packages it pulls the i586 as dependencies. I've pointed all repo files to x86_64 and I really don't know how and why this happens? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 08:38 +0100, Joshua C. wrote: 2009/7/10 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com: On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits? I'm pretty sure you're looking at it wrong. I don't know but when I try to install one of those x86_64 packages it pulls the i586 as dependencies. I've pointed all repo files to x86_64 and I really don't know how and why this happens? The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier, e.g. instead of # yum install foo perform # yum install foo.x86_64 -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
Thank you very much for doing this. Happy hacking, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Champlain
I am going to update libchamplain from 0.2.9 to 0.3.3 in Fedora 11. This involves a change in the soname, but since no other package depends on it I hope it would not be a problem. On the plus side, the GtkChamplainEmbed widget which was earlier separately released has been merged into the libchamplain tarball and we can put in a subpackage. Not to mention that potential Champlain users and developers will find this helpful. What do you think? Happy hacking, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Champlain
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:36 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote: I am going to update libchamplain from 0.2.9 to 0.3.3 in Fedora 11. This involves a change in the soname, but since no other package depends on it I hope it would not be a problem. On the plus side, the GtkChamplainEmbed widget which was earlier separately released has been merged into the libchamplain tarball and we can put in a subpackage. Not to mention that potential Champlain users and developers will find this helpful. What do you think? I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8 compat) it's a no go for now. Regarding pushing this to F11, I really don't think we should, since the only real consumer of libchamplain is Empathy and we won't be pushing a version of it with libchamplain support to F11. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Champlain
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 18:25 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote: So no one is affected by this change. On the other hand, 0.2.x is old and 0.3.x is where the fun is. So atleast some developers would benefit from it and libchamplain-0.3 would also get some testing leading to a better 0.4.x. Since the are some consumers that could make use of it that I wasn't aware of, it's probably worth it (assuming we also update Rawhide, so we don't have NVR issues). Later, /B -- Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-07-10
On 07/10/2009 09:04 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: 18:08:49jds2001 #topic Feature - extended lifecycle (...snip...) 18:15:31jwb jds2001, we have majority vote to move to the Board I'm interested to know what the follow-up on this would be; Is it added to the board's agenda? Also, I would appreciate if the verdict goes in the ticket; https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/180 Thanks! Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Champlain
I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8 compat) it's a no go for now. That is also what I was waiting for. Regarding pushing this to F11, I really don't think we should, since the only real consumer of libchamplain is Empathy There is a Eye of GNOME plugin too. and we won't be pushing a version of it with libchamplain support to F11. So no one is affected by this change. On the other hand, 0.2.x is old and 0.3.x is where the fun is. So atleast some developers would benefit from it and libchamplain-0.3 would also get some testing leading to a better 0.4.x. Cheers, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Champlain
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:37:49 -0400, Brian wrote: I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8 compat) it's a no go for now. Regarding pushing this to F11, I really don't think we should, since the only real consumer of libchamplain is Empathy and we won't be pushing a version of it with libchamplain support to F11. Geeqie could use it (and libchamplain-gtk) too, but requires = 0.3.0. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: 3Dsee.net java applet crashes firefox
Mat Booth wrote: Though after a little thought, it could be the proprietary nvidia driver I'm using. It most definitely is. Yet another nvidia driver bug... Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
Till Maas wrote: mingw32-nsis2.44 207b0 Hmmm, the regex is somehow picking up something broken. The current version is actually 2.45. I should probably make it read http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Download instead. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
On Sat July 11 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: Till Maas wrote: mingw32-nsis2.44 207b0 Hmmm, the regex is somehow picking up something broken. The current version is actually 2.45. I should probably make it read http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Download instead. In 2005 they released a tarball named nsis-207b0-src.tar.bz2. With the other URL it works, therefore I changed it. Regards Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
Till Maas wrote: Aloas, some of you added your packages to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_FEver_to_track_upstream_changes Unfortunately seems the original author of fever not to be around anymore, e.g. his fedorapeople account is removed/backed-up. Therefore I started to write a new framework to replace it. My tool is not ready to bug you via private mail or create bug reports, therefore I only post the current findings here: Thanks! I wonder, can FEver become part of the Fedora infrastructure, so it's not quite so bus-sensitive? -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote: snip The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier, e.g. instead of # yum install foo perform # yum install foo.x86_64 Doesn't seem to work for wine :) Regards, Frank -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
On Sat July 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote: I wonder, can FEver become part of the Fedora infrastructure, so it's not quite so bus-sensitive? Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily the code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly available, therefore this needs to be rewritten. Regards Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
On Sat July 11 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote: Thanks for nice work. I too mailed other some time back .. but did not recieved any mail back. May you share the program ;) I'll share the program once I setup some repo for it, which will probably happen the next time I spend a reasonable amount of time on it. Regards Till signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote: snip The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier, e.g. instead of # yum install foo perform # yum install foo.x86_64 Doesn't seem to work for wine :) yum install foo will install foo.x86_64 by default it will only install foo.i586 if foo.x86_64 when s/if foo.x86_64// ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote: snip The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier, e.g. instead of # yum install foo perform # yum install foo.x86_64 Doesn't seem to work for wine :) yum install foo will install foo.x86_64 by default it will only install foo.i586 if foo.x86_64 when 1) you do yum install foo and only foo.i586 is in the repo 2) yo do yum install foo.i586 3) if you set exactarch=0 in /etc/yum.conf (default is 1 which leads to the behavior I explained above) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: prelink: is it worth it?
[benefit of prelink:] - almost all relocations a program has to perform are avoided. These can be very expensive when many dependencies and/or large symbol tables are involved. The latter is somewhat mitigated by the new symbol table hashing we implemented some time back but still. About 10% to 50% of the time on i686, this benefit of prelink is trashed by the randomization of the placement of [vdso], also known as linux-gate.so. If the page that the kernel chooses for [vdso] overlaps any pre-linked needed shared library, then ld-linux cannot avoid processing the relocations for that library. Often the cost snowballs as libraries that do not get their pre-linked pages are moved so that they interfere with subsequent libraries. [On x86_64 the vdso is at a special fixed address that cannot conflict.] Try this example from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162797 - for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do for j in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do for k in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do ldd /bin/cat done done done | grep libc | sort | uniq -c - For current Fedora 11 on i686, I see a conflict about 10% of the time, involving only ld-linux, libc, and [vdso]. This means that glibc must be dynamically relocated about 10% of the time anyway, even though glibc has been pre-linked, and even though /bin/cat is near minimal in its use of shared libraries. When a GNOME app uses 50 or more pre-linked shared libs, as claimed in another thread on this subject, then runtime conflict and expense are even more likely. If time performance matters a lot, then the kernel must co-operate when placing the vdso. A patch to FC5 was submitted and adopted some years ago to offer the choice of: no vdso, random vdso, vdso just below STACKTOP, vdso just below PT_INTERP (namely, ld-linux.so.2), vdso just below main. Maintenance suffered because exec_shield was not in the kernel mainline. None of the choices is available today. Even the remaining comment in Fedora's kernel/sysctl.c [just after int exec_shield = (10);] is incorrect. -- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: prelink: is it worth it?
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:45 AM, devzero2000 wrote: 2 - not checked if this problem is actual or not: prelink erases file-based capabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456105 Which remains 'NEW' a year after it was opened. It was recently reconfirmed by Tomas Mraz in F11. We have a number of apps that use file system capabilities, so we don't install prelink. This is frustrating since it impacts interactive app performance. joe -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fail2ban + Shorewall Question
On 07/11/2009 10:01 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote: No kidding. I've submitted two patches... one just removing the dep, and two adding a subpackage as an alternative route. Hopefully this will help move it along. Axel Thimm has only been sporadically active for a long time now. There are a number of bugs against his packages that he has not responded to but I didn't realize the situation was so bad. I think it is high time, we orphan the packages and let more interested maintainers take over. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fail2ban + Shorewall Question
On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/11/2009 10:01 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote: No kidding. I've submitted two patches... one just removing the dep, and two adding a subpackage as an alternative route. Hopefully this will help move it along. Axel Thimm has only been sporadically active for a long time now. There are a number of bugs against his packages that he has not responded to but I didn't realize the situation was so bad. I think it is high time, we orphan the packages and let more interested maintainers take over. I'd be interested in taking over fail2ban though I'm just now learning the procedures involved in doing so... and researched everything online for Fedora/EPEL Package Maintainers. Any pointers welcome. --- derks -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote: Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily the code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly available, therefore this needs to be rewritten. What language is it written in? Should be easy to implement using python-bugzilla assuming it's written in python. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
Frank Murphy wrote: Doesn't seem to work for wine :) That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rpm %defattr question
Hi, is the default attribute definition %defattr(-,root,root) the same as %defattr(-,root,root,-)? -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: RFC: cronKit
Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger: Hi, since I sync my mail with the experimental gnome ui of offlineimap, I encounter a small problem: How do I tell cron to only invoke the job when I am logged in under gnome only? How about http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/DoThisNow Since I want the job only to be run if I am logged in under gnome the main idea is to have a process added to the session that can handle crontab like jobs (aka cronKit) No more kits please. ;) Whatever the new software would be named, pls don't make another *kit. Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote: The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show respect where respect is warranted. I'm sure Al Capone got a lot of respect in his day as well. ;-) I think that he *demanded* that respect. Deserved? Not really. -- David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Frank Murphy wrote: Doesn't seem to work for wine :) That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are. Kevin Kofler Winblow$? You really should learn some control here. The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show respect where respect is warranted. Microsoft should recieve that respect IMO. 90% of the desktop computers in the world use some version of Windows. More desktop computers use some form of Mac OS than all combined versions (distributions) of Linux. WINE? Is a nice concept. But it will never, again IMO, as long as the 'Windows programs' that WINE can run are mostly really old DOS programs. Sheesh. -- Perhaps you should do a little research before you spout off. Wine is capable of running very modern day applications that are written for the windows platform. It is anything but old dos programs. -- Jes -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Frank Murphy wrote: Doesn't seem to work for wine :) That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are. Kevin Kofler Winblow$? You really should learn some control here. The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show respect where respect is warranted. Microsoft should recieve that respect IMO. 90% of the desktop computers in the world use some version of Windows. More desktop computers use some form of Mac OS than all combined versions (distributions) of Linux. WINE? Is a nice concept. But it will never, again IMO, as long as the 'Windows programs' that WINE can run are mostly really old DOS programs. Sheesh. -- Perhaps you should do a little research before you spout off. Wine is capable of running very modern day applications that are written for the windows platform. It is anything but old dos programs. Mr. Keating. May I call you Jessie? I know who you are and I respect you a lot. Would you please name some very modern day applications that are written for the windows platform that will run in a Linux current version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_ applications. The ones that ordinary 'users' want. Not the geeky ones that 'Linux geeks' want. I am serious here. Really. The names are...? -- David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 506262] X crash - FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc: 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506262 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #351327|application/plain-text |text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:09:28 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update oflb-notcouriersans-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507637] Missing fontset info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507637 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:29:51 EDT --- cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cjkuni-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-11 13:29:56 EDT --- cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cjkuni-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 --- Additional comments from jeremygharri...@openoffice.org Sat Jul 11 18:58:23 + 2009 --- I would like to have voted for this issue. I find it most confusing (and would say wrong) that the font actually being used is not that stated. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] CC BY SA 3.0 unported or ported or ...
Any thoughts about this? On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 07:27:36PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: I understand there are a few types of CC BY SA 3.0 license, ported and unported. http://monitor.creativecommons.org/Unported Which do we want to use when relicening all Fedora content and as our default license choice (for now)? Or is it really a three-way choice? 1. Ported only 2. Unported only 3. Ported where it exists, otherwise unported Thanks - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41 -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41 pgpKDaZDVA0KW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
preupgrade fails F10 - F11
It downloads everything correctly, but after the reboot and start of the install process I get the message: /usr/tmp is not a symlink I checked this and on the hard drive /usr/tmp is a symlink to /var/tmp. I tried a couple of times, but I get the same error every time. Has anyone an idea how to fix this. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samba configuration
alan duval wrote: [ printers ] comment = All Printers path = / var / spool /samba no space before and after '/'. My question: What should I change MIDEARTH to? 'workgroup' you use for your system and 'workgroup' you use for your virtual box and what you put in 'smb.conf' should all be same. As I log on to Fedora as alan should I change it to alan? alan is your 'user' name, not 'workgroup'. this allows you to have multi users who can be in same 'workgroup'. Or should it be the name of a workgroup in my WIN XP virtual OS? see above. Where does one get the netbios name from to enter in the script, this i do not recall and i do not have samba on this box to see what i used. therefore i suggest 'man smb.conf' also, have a look at red hat deployment guide. latest is at; http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/ hth. crash time. good night. much luck to you. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:47:07 am Jussi Lehtola wrote: This also means I'm almost not really upgrading anything. FC5-CentOS5 is similar to FC5-F6 (ok, with some backports, I know) Exactly, such as firefox, openoffice and so on. (clip) Also, remember that Fedora EPEL has quite a lot of packages nowadays for RHEL(ish) distros, so you won't trade off in package availability as much as you think. What about multi-media? Are packages such as mplayer, mp3 and video codecs etc available or buildable for Centos5.3? I would use it as my desktop if so. -- Anthony ShipmanMamas don't let your babies a...@iinet.net.au grow up to be outsourced. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:50:26 +1000 Anthony Shipman wrote: What about multi-media? Are packages such as mplayer, mp3 and video codecs etc available or buildable for Centos5.3? I would use it as my desktop if so. rpmforge -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Logging on ATT Yahoo Dial-Up with Linux
Roy Quick wrote: July 9, 2009 Anybody, please advise me how to log on ATT Yahoo dial-up after installing Fedora. Frustrated. I have not be able to make connect after installing any Linux OS. ATT Yahoo techs, of course, respond that they do not support Linux. If impossible to log on with ATT Yahoo dial-up, please suggest another Internet Provider. Tried a local Internet Provider recently. Found it preventing updates. Dropped it. Roy Quick roy.qu...@att.net You did not mention which program you are using to make the dial-up connection. I always install both KDE and Gnome, then use KPPP for dial-up. You will have to edit the /etc/sysconfig/network file to add the line GATEWAYDEV=ppp0 (assuming ppp0 is your modem device). You may need to change the ppp0 to whatever your modem device is. Are you using a winmodem? You may need to do some extra configuration. I don't know how well Fedora works with winmodems. I use an external serial modem. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 01:10 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote: I'm still having problems downloading from liberty.edu . Ex, installing kdenlive: Check that you have the mirrorlist enabled in the /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*.repo files and install yum-fastestmirror. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samsung Laser printers and F10/11?
Tim Waugh wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:05 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: *theoretically*, how should i have configured that printer? because i should at least try it that way to see if the problem still exists. According to openprinting.org there is no free driver for that device (closest match shown): http://openprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Samsung-SCX-4828FN So the Samsung supplied driver is the only option you have for that printer. I came across what appears to be a useful post concerning the scanning function of the scx-4500w (which I now have) at http://www.nabble.com/Samsung-SCX-4500W-seems-to-work-td24293013.html This post mentions using a slightly altered xerox backend file at /etc/sane.d/xerox_mfp.conf However in F10 under /etc/sane.d/ I don't find any xerox files in this directory. Can anyone point me to a guide on how to get hold of these files, and also the steps needed to install/test in F10/11 and try this for the scanning function of this printer? Also in terms of the printing function I also came across the ppd file in the Samsung official downloads for the printer - they have three tarballs available (dated from a few months ago) with various applications for Linux and within these files there is a file scx4500w.ppd that presumably be used to drive the printer? I have only ever used printers in the past that just work in Linux so this is a new venture for me. Is it possible using the standard tools in F10/11 to install the ppd file and try to print from cups in the usual way? If so again can someone point me to a guide? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Samsung-Laser-printers-and-F10-11--tp24389848p24438822.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
cups configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I want to configure cups on laptops so that people could add any printer they want, and choose the default printer they want too. I don't want to give them the root password. What is possible, using the web interface, is to allow anybody to remove tasks, even if they are not the owner of the task. I want also that these permissions to add and choose the default printer, will be be limited to the laptop only, I mean: if the laptop is connected to a network, I don't want that these persmissions could be automatically extended to any other cups server on the network. Is this possible? And how? Thanks - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpYb0UACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWI2gCgib2r1kG4u0GS2Q79YNtYLCOi fsoAn3ozDsbmUu/VrP7cYqAp61iXtk64 =pt+V -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Java and font rendering on F11
On 10/07/09 22:08, Andrea wrote: Hi, I've just installed Netbeans on F11 and I have to say that the quality font used for menus and widgets is appaling. The same happens to all other Java applications. Basically the font is very small and thin (used for menus, buttons...) In netbeans, I can change the font used in source code editor, but not the rest of the GUI. I don't seem to remember this happening on F9. The font is so awful I cannot tell the difference between colon and semicolon! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/11/2009 04:29 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: Then you should forget other users testing and evaluating it and gauging response Thank you for your opinion but I have enough feedback necessary. We have enough stats indicating that a large majority of users to continue to use 32-bit systems and I won't be doing any more builds of this remix and yes doing your own builds is a way to contribute if you are interested. Good luck. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: how many packages?
On 07/11/2009 01:39 AM, davide wrote: I was also interested in learning to build my onw packages for the few bits I need... Take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 19:25:50 +0200, Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote: The system is on RAIDed disks, so I will disconnect one of them as an easy rollback chance in case of unresolvable issues. That's unlikely to work for you. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188314 A bug is a case where software does not work as intended, the behavior you don't like is a design decision in that the software works exactly as intended, but you you don't like it. This should have been a request for enhancement all along. Since there is a general use for more ability to create custom raid arrays, the ability to use an existing array would be useful. I find it particularly vexing that whoever wrote the raid code did not understand the difference between raid-10 and raid-1+0 and insists that at least four drives are needed to support raid-10, and the number must be even. So put this in as an enhancement request to use existing arrays, see if that goes anywhere. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Random screen blanking -- a clue
On 07/10/2009 10:49 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Richard Shaw writes: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Sam Varshavchikmr...@courier-mta.com wrote: It's the screensaver. Something's causing it to trip, when it shouldn't. I was hoping wasn't the only person having that problem! Anyone have a solution other than disabling dpms? Yes. Beer. Beer, as a step towards a solution, is generally a good approach. Another mee too here, btw. I was wondering if it was just my ancient CRT that was on its last legs but then came to the realisation that it looked more like power management bug. It's annoying, but it's not the end of the world. I can see why this may be a problem if you're playing some game; except in that case, it's just a minor annoyance. I have to disagree with that. At best, it's a minor annoyance if one is working (read: trying to get stuff done). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: cups configuration
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 12:53 +0200, François Patte wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I want to configure cups on laptops so that people could add any printer they want, and choose the default printer they want too. I don't want to give them the root password. What is possible, using the web interface, is to allow anybody to remove tasks, even if they are not the owner of the task. I want also that these permissions to add and choose the default printer, will be be limited to the laptop only, I mean: if the laptop is connected to a network, I don't want that these persmissions could be automatically extended to any other cups server on the network. Is this possible? And how? Thanks Making a laptop a cups swerver seems like a really bad idea. Laptops are designed to move around onto different networks that would have different pronters. As far as I know adding a pronter requires root permisions although sudo may loosen that restriction. As far as I know cups permissions on a cups server are limited to that server. -- === The computer is to the information industry roughly what the central power station is to the electrical industry. -- Peter Drucker === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Logging on ATT Yahoo Dial-Up with Linux
On 11/07/09 13:56, Aaron Konstam wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 04:06 -0500, s wrote: Roy Quick wrote: July 9, 2009 Are you using a winmodem? You may need to do some extra configuration. I don't know how well Fedora works with winmodems. I use an external serial modem. In my memory winmmodems don't work with Linux at all. http://www.linmodems.org/ Regards, Frank -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Logging on ATT Yahoo Dial-Up with Linux
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 04:06 -0500, s wrote: Roy Quick wrote: July 9, 2009 Anybody, please advise me how to log on ATT Yahoo dial-up after installing Fedora. Frustrated. I have not be able to make connect after installing any Linux OS. ATT Yahoo techs, of course, respond that they do not support Linux. If impossible to log on with ATT Yahoo dial-up, please suggest another Internet Provider. Tried a local Internet Provider recently. Found it preventing updates. Dropped it. Roy Quick roy.qu...@att.net You did not mention which program you are using to make the dial-up connection. I always install both KDE and Gnome, then use KPPP for dial-up. You will have to edit the /etc/sysconfig/network file to add the line GATEWAYDEV=ppp0 (assuming ppp0 is your modem device). You may need to change the ppp0 to whatever your modem device is. Are you using a winmodem? You may need to do some extra configuration. I don't know how well Fedora works with winmodems. I use an external serial modem. In my memory winmmodems don't work with Linux at all. -- === I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: how to kill mail threads i dont care about - someone w procmail skill?
On 07/11/2009 12:50 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: I've got one, and it looks quite a bit like what you outlined below in psuedo-code. ;) In my procmail config, I have these two recipes: This looks great thank you .. I will experiemnt. gene/ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: cups configuration
François Patte wrote: Bonjour, I want to configure cups on laptops so that people could add any printer they want, and choose the default printer they want too. I don't want to give them the root password. What is possible, using the web interface, is to allow anybody to remove tasks, even if they are not the owner of the task. I want also that these permissions to add and choose the default printer, will be be limited to the laptop only, I mean: if the laptop is connected to a network, I don't want that these persmissions could be automatically extended to any other cups server on the network. Is this possible? And how? It is already possible for each user to select their own default printer. In Gnome, it is System -- Preferences -- Hardware -- Default Printer. As far as giving permission to add/remove/change printers, you can add the user to the system group. This will basically give full access. Or you can add them to /etc/cups/cups.conf in the Require user section of the desired access. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samba configuration
alan duval wrote: I have been reading the Samba HowTo to figure out how to configure it so that a guest OS in VirtualBox can use the printer. The article gives the following example for the configuration file: Example 2.3.3 Anonymous Print Server smb.conf # Global parameters [ global ] workgroup = MIDEARTH netbios name = LUTHIEN security = share printcap name = cups disable spoolss = Yes show add printer wizard = No printing = cups [ printers ] comment = All Printers path = / var / spool /samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes use client driver = Yes browseable = No My question: What should I change MIDEARTH to? As I log on to Fedora as alan should I change it to alan? Or should it be the name of a workgroup in my WIN XP virtual OS? Where does one get the netbios name from to enter in the script, bearing in mind that this is a standalone computer which a virtual OS wants to print to? Regards, Alan Duval First, you should be able to use the stock Samba configuration file - you may have to uncomment the gest ok = no on the printer section and change it to yes. Second, change MIDEARTH to what ever workgroup name your are using with the guests. I believe the default is WORKGROUP. Thisr, change LUTHIEN to what ever name you want this computer to show up as when browsing the network. I usually take the hostname of the computer. If the full name is name.system.com then call the computer NAME. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samsung Laser printers and F10/11?
On 07/11/2009 05:47 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: This post mentions using a slightly altered xerox backend file at /etc/sane.d/xerox_mfp.conf However in F10 under /etc/sane.d/ I don't find any xerox files in this directory. Can anyone point me to a guide on how to get hold of these files, and also the steps needed to install/test in F10/11 and try this for the scanning function of this printer? It appears that this file is in 1.0.20 version of sane-backends which was released at the beginning of May. (http://www.sane-project.org) Fedora is still on 1.0.10 .. so you may want to poke the maintainer to update ? gene/ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samsung Laser printers and F10/11?
On 07/11/2009 10:41 AM, Mail Lists wrote: On 07/11/2009 05:47 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: This post mentions using a slightly altered xerox backend file at /etc/sane.d/xerox_mfp.conf However in F10 under /etc/sane.d/ I don't find any xerox files in this directory. Can anyone point me to a guide on how to get hold of these files, and also the steps needed to install/test in F10/11 and try this for the scanning function of this printer? It appears that this file is in 1.0.20 version of sane-backends which was released at the beginning of May. (http://www.sane-project.org) Fedora is still on 1.0.10 .. so you may want to poke the maintainer to update ? Typo - f10 and f11 are on 1.0.19 .. you probably still need 1.0.20. You could just download from upstream perhaps ? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Samsung Laser printers and F10/11?
Mail Lists-3 wrote: On 07/11/2009 10:41 AM, Mail Lists wrote: Typo - f10 and f11 are on 1.0.19 .. you probably still need 1.0.20. You could just download from upstream perhaps ? Yes indeed. By the way the Samsung driver stuff is at http://www.samsung.com/uk/support/download/supportDown.do?group=printsolutionstype=printsolutionssubtype=monomultifunctionproductsmodel_nm=SCX-4500Wlanguage=cate_type=alldType=DmType=DRvType=prd_ia_cd=06010300disp_nm=SCX-4500Wmodel_cd=menu=download and the ppd file scx4500w.ppd is in the directory cdroot/Linux/noarch/at_opt/share/ppd/ in the Unified Linux Driver tarball once it is untarred. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Samsung-Laser-printers-and-F10-11--tp24389848p24440928.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
prelink segfault
I am getting the following on one of my Fedora boxes. Has anyone any ideas how to tackle it. I have reinstalled prelink. /etc/cron.daily/prelink: /etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 594 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 21 Steve -- Play Champions - my free football predictions game at: http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html 16:20:00 up 9 days, 19:10, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 pgpVM2RMaDHjd.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: f11 - bt mouse random jump
On 07/10/2009 11:10 PM, Mail Lists wrote: Since installing f11 (clean) - i have 2 blueooth mice - and randomly the cursor jumps to the top left corner (applications button). Same problem on both - never had a problem on f10 (also was running gnome). Seems to be bluetooth mouse only ... anyone else seeing similar ? At first It seemed like it might be a touchpad thing on laptop - but it happens with nothing touching the laptop at all - just hand on bt mouse. I see it with a Targus BT mouse. On my Lenovo T61... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 00:49 +, g wrote: another reason, at least as i was told, key servers do not verify who submits a key is actual owner of address. The whole point of PGP-style signatures is the web of trust. If you don't get someone's public key directly from them (e.g. at a key-signing party) or from an intermediary that you both trust sufficiently, you basically know nothing about the sender. The point of key servers is not to verify anything, it's to make keys easily accessible. Using a public key and not putting it on a key server means a random reader can't even verify that a succession of messages were signed with the same key (the only info in the signature itself is the Key ID, which is fakable with enough effort). Putting it on a key server without an independant verification channel does at least allow a motivated reader to check with high confidence that a bunch of messages use the same key, but doesn't allow them to check if they were signed by the correct person. And in conclusion: the use of signatures (even registered ones) on large, essentially anonymous, mailing lists is at best debatable. What exactly do people expect to gain from this? Signatures were invented in large part to allow integrity and non-repudiation of messages. If I see a message purportedly from myself on this list and I didn't send it, I'll be very quick to repudiate it. Has this ever happened in anyone's memory? poc PS I highly recommend a Stanford paper from a few years back, entitled Why Johnny Can't Encrypt. Google for it, it's very illuminating. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Random screen blanking -- a clue
On 07/10/2009 10:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: There's been a steady trickle of complaints from different folks about their screens going blank for a second, or two, after upgrading to F11. I've observed this too -- it happens on one of my laptops every couple of days, or so. I've always had the impression that, for some reason, this was the screensaver kicking in. They way that happened always gave me that idea. I'm now pretty sure that, sometimes, for some reason the screensaver kicks in even though the system is not idle. I just finished typing, and began reading something on the screen, when the screen went black about three seconds after I stopped typing. I did nothing, and the screen continued to stay black. After waiting about ten seconds, I pressed the shift key, and my desktop came back. It's the screensaver. Something's causing it to trip, when it shouldn't. Happens on my Lenovo T61. Usually just goes out for a second or 2 and then comes back. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/10/09 23:34, quoth Steven W. Orr: On 07/10/09 18:47, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson: David, one way to solve the problem is to write a filter rule that sends g's messages directly to trash. New entry in my access file From:gel...@bellsouth.net REJECT 553 PGP signing with no public key. Interesting. The little bastard got through at 4:45AM so the access trick doesn't work. The reason it failed was because the From address wasn't geleem. It was really fedora-list-bounces. So I added a blacklist_from to my spamassassin local.cf. Assuming this works and he gets the message then the only way I'll get notified is if someone else tells me. - -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpYsckACgkQRIVy4fC+NyQ9/QCdFmM9x0y4M6QU2KfuYQIsQqW9 vusAnAnainh4ewzQrcMdhnaM9hFFp1gf =fA5t -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
On 7/10/2009 11:34 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: On 07/10/09 18:47, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson: David, one way to solve the problem is to write a filter rule that sends g's messages directly to trash. New entry in my access file From:gel...@bellsouth.net REJECT 553 PGP signing with no public key. For some reason this has not made it to the list. I apologize if this shows up twice. I was trying to advise him that he should do the correct thing. I failed at that. His GunPG signature is a waste of time, his time and my time, since it can not be verified that it is even his signature. I did not want to /null/void his posts. With his 'nasty' reply he has given me no other choice. His posts will now be deleted directly from the email server before downloading. Sad thing about that is that if, in the future, he should decide to use GnuPG properly I'll never know. BTW. You did notice that I made no comment on his excessively long and rambling 'signature'. :-) -- David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
Jussi Lehtola wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 01:10 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote: I'm still having problems downloading from liberty.edu . Ex, installing kdenlive: Check that you have the mirrorlist enabled in the /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*.repo files and install yum-fastestmirror. You and Leo provide together a very complete answer, but yours would be the easiest for newbies, mainly that once installed yum-fastestmirror is enabled by default in less /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf [main] enabled=1 verbose=0 always_print_best_host = true socket_timeout=3 hostfilepath=/var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt maxhostfileage=10 maxthreads=15 Why isn't this the default? Thanks for your outstanding support, folks! It's really appreciated. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 8:05 AM On 07/11/2009 04:29 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: Then you should forget other users testing and evaluating it and gauging response Thank you for your opinion but I have enough feedback necessary. We have enough stats indicating that a large majority of users to continue to use 32-bit systems and I won't be doing any more builds of this remix and yes doing your own builds is a way to contribute if you are interested. Good luck. So, your response to Christoph when you appropriated his hard work, reducing him to a byline, was just something made up to extricate yourself from an indefensible situation? Your response on 32-bit systems is puerile: there has been no claim made that a large majority of users use 32-bit systems. Besides, how do you know anything about 64-bit or other systems in this case, since there is no way you can find out anything about these other systems, once again in this case? I am pretty certain that all new chips are 64-bit: of course, users should continue to use older 32-bit systems if they have any, but you are shutting off development of the LXDE spin to the newer chips. I fail to see how everyone with his/her own private remixes/spins can contribute to the building of an official Fedora remix/spin. Arrogance and whim are not good open-source values: they are best left behind for the closed-source worldas is appropriation which is sort of how windoze started -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/11/2009 09:40 PM, Globe Trotter wrote: So, your response to Christoph when you appropriated his hard work, reducing him to a byline, was just something made up to extricate yourself from an indefensible situation? What is so indefensible about saying that I don't have a 64-bit system to create a 64-bit variant for you nor do I have the time to test more variants? As far as I can see, you want a 64-bit variant and you seem upset that I didn't volunteer my time to create that for you. Your response on 32-bit systems is puerile: there has been no claim made that a large majority of users use 32-bit systems. Actually, there is clear evidence for this. See smolt.org stats for example. I fail to see how everyone with his/her own private remixes/spins can contribute to the building of an official Fedora remix/spin. It is fairly easy, take the kickstart file, do your own builds and report problems or other feedback to the package maintainers and remix or spin maintainers. Arrogance and whim are not good open-source values: they are best left behind for the closed-source worldas is appropriation which is sort of how windoze started You have thrown such accusations at me before for no good reason. This course of discussion is not constructive. I suggest you use your energy in a better way. Rahul Ps: Your mail client doesn't line wrap properly. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Preup F10-F11: Eclipse looses Java and SVN capabilities
Hello, All, I just upgraded from F10 to F11 with the preupgrade that popped up spontaneously. Now, when I open Eclipse, it seems to have lost all its Java and SVN capabilities. The SVN plugins still are listed as installed, and I don't know what components Eclipse needs to do Java. Any thoughts? Thanks! Take care Oliver -- Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist BioPAX Integration at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/biopax) Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Taking a beating with Windoze 7 pricing
I liked this article, so thought I would share http://blogs.computerworld.com/taking_a_beating_with_windows_7_pricing#comment-149481 Meanwhile, there is an older article which I had not seen before: http://blogs.computerworld.com/macs_windows_7_and_linux Enjoy! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 08:57:54 -0400, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: Since there is a general use for more ability to create custom raid arrays, the ability to use an existing array would be useful. I find it particularly vexing that whoever wrote the raid code did not understand the difference between raid-10 and raid-1+0 and insists that at least four drives are needed to support raid-10, and the number must be even. So put this in as an enhancement request to use existing arrays, see if that goes anywhere. The people who control this do not think raid 1 arrays with one element should be supported for installs. I am not that interested in raid 10. If there is an incorrect limitation on the number of elements for that type of an array, someone who knows more about it should make that request. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 08:57:54 -0400, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: Since there is a general use for more ability to create custom raid arrays, the ability to use an existing array would be useful. I find it particularly vexing that whoever wrote the raid code did not understand the difference between raid-10 and raid-1+0 and insists that at least four drives are needed to support raid-10, and the number must be even. So put this in as an enhancement request to use existing arrays, see if that goes anywhere. The people who control this do not think raid 1 arrays with one element should be supported for installs. I am not that interested in raid 10. If there is an incorrect limitation on the number of elements for that type of an array, someone who knows more about it should make that request. The point is that since you have the problem which would be solved by using existing raid arrays, and you have been trying without success to get action as a bug for years, you might be the person to present this as an enhancement request to use existing raid arrays, since that would solve other people's problems as well as yours, and get you some support from people who would also be helped. You don't have to know much about raid-10 to say use existing arrays, people who know tricks will take it from there, including you. Or you can go another four years trying to get someone to agree that it's a bug, and explicit support for degraded arrays should be added. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a normal user and is setuid root, with the vi line edit mode selected, and the character set is big5, an off-by-one error occurs during wildcard (glob) expansion. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Gedit doesn't like root
I just removed Totem to repalce it by MPlayer, which is suggested by Radio-Canada to read its video. I had many applications open, maybe I should have closed them... It finally took more than half an hour to install Mplayer and this, with yum-fastestmirror installed! Anyways, it might have nothing to do but, when I tried to edit /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf as root afterwards, -- I thought verbose mode was preferable -- I received about 3 full screens of the following text: GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Failed to get connection to session: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.) There seems to be a little problem here. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Upgrade from FC6 to FC11
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 13:11:53 -0400, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: The point is that since you have the problem which would be solved by using existing raid arrays, and you have been trying without success to get action as a bug for years, you might be the person to present this as an enhancement request to use existing raid arrays, since that would solve other people's problems as well as yours, and get you some support from people who would also be helped. You don't have to know much about raid-10 to say use existing arrays, people who know tricks will take it from there, including you. I asked for it as an enhancement and had discussions on mailing lists. The anaconda guys don't want to allow raid 1 arrays with one element to be used during installs. They are aware of the arguments and have said no. At this point I think the only factor that might change their minds is how many people want this use case. They already know I want it, so my pestering them again doesn't add anything. Or you can go another four years trying to get someone to agree that it's a bug, and explicit support for degraded arrays should be added. I already talked about it with them as an enhancement. Just because there isn't RFE in the summary or a futurefeature keyword, doesn't mean it wasn't considered and rejected as an enhancement. Also note that I also argued for nondegraded raid 1 arrays with one element (which is not the same as a degraded array that normally has two elements) and that was rejected as well. The farthest they have gone is saying that they are willing to leave extra unused space so that you could make an partition into a raid array after the fact. I think that is not a good direction to go in for several reasons and don't want to pursue that. I have other Fedora things needing doing, so I am not going to spend my limited time championing changes in raid 10 configruation restrictions when I don't use it and don't know much about its details. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Scanning over network in Fedora 11
I want to setup network scanning in Fedora, but no success. I try to describe my setup in a quite detailed manner: 1. My scanner works fine locally: $ scanimage -L device `snapscan:libusb:004:003' is a AGFA SNAPSCAN 1212U_2 flatbed scanner 2. I have the configured like this in /etc/sane.d/saned.conf: ... 192.168.2.0/24 localhost (my local network is 192.168.2.XXX) 3. In /etc/services ther are the proper ports listed: sane-port 6566/tcp# SANE Control Port sane-port 6566/udp# SANE Control Port 4. saned is started from xinetd, configured like this: # /etc/xinetd.d/sane # Sane network access service sane-port { disable= no socket_type = stream protocol= tcp wait= no user= kp server = /usr/sbin/saned } (kp is my user) 5. Now I try to check if saned is running properly: $ telnet localhost 6566 gives this output: Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 6. But whenever I telnet to saned remotely, even from this very machine using it's ip address, I get: Trying 192.168.2.35... Connected to 192.168.2.35. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. 7. So I ran sane in debug mode (saned -d128, with the daemon stopped), and I got the following error messages from step 6: ... [saned] saned (AF-indep+IPv6) from sane-backends 1.0.19 ready [saned] check_host: access by remote host: 192.168.2.35 [saned] check_host: remote host is not IN_LOOPBACK nor IN6_LOOPBACK [saned] check_host: local hostname: kellercomputer.kralenriede.de [saned] check_host: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname [saned] init: access by host 192.168.2.35 denied [saned] quit: exiting 8. BTW, the firewall is turned off. Now, what may have gone wrong? Any help would be greately appreciated, Klaus -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Scanning over network in Fedora 11
Klaus-Peter Schrage writes: 6. But whenever I telnet to saned remotely, even from this very machine using it's ip address, I get: Trying 192.168.2.35... Connected to 192.168.2.35. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. 7. So I ran sane in debug mode (saned -d128, with the daemon stopped), and I got the following error messages from step 6: ... [saned] saned (AF-indep+IPv6) from sane-backends 1.0.19 ready [saned] check_host: access by remote host: 192.168.2.35 [saned] check_host: remote host is not IN_LOOPBACK nor IN6_LOOPBACK [saned] check_host: local hostname: kellercomputer.kralenriede.de [saned] check_host: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname [saned] init: access by host 192.168.2.35 denied [saned] quit: exiting 8. BTW, the firewall is turned off. Now, what may have gone wrong? What the error message says: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname. The DNS lookup for kellercomputer.kralenriede.de failed. You need to fix your DNS. pgpCpGWamwP12.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/11/2009 11:01 PM, Globe Trotter wrote: No question, but the line you took out from my response says that there is no way you can measure interest in 64-bit or other LXDE since there is no way this can be gauged since it is not provided. Yes, but my point is that since 32-bit downloads and use is the majority by far, the feedback from users using that architecture is going to be naturally more and therefore for the purposes of getting more feedback, that is architecture more developers are going to target. This is something quite obvious. If you are put off by that, I can't help you. Yes, but the step-by-step instructions are far from clear. Also, I would perhaps add some of my own rpms that i believe should be in... What is not clear? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD If you have specific questions, feel free to ask. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: prelink segfault
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:21:35 +0100 Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com wrote: I am getting the following on one of my Fedora boxes. Has anyone any ideas how to tackle it. I have reinstalled prelink. /etc/cron.daily/prelink: /etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 594 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 21 Steve F11 x86_64 I had never looked in detail at prelink operation before. I looked at the script in /etc/cron.daily and line 47 is after everything has been resolved and it is running the prelink. I then looked at /var/log/prelink/prelink.log and there were *lots* of executables that couldn't be prelinked because libraries they used couldn't be prelinked. At the top of the file was the actual command that was run (line 46 in the cron.daily script puts it in the log). Look at the end to see if prelink wrote any pertinent information about what it was doing when the seg fault happened. It seems unlikely but worth a shot. Then I would suggest, as root, run strace (the command at the top of the log file) | less When it hits the executable it is trying to prelink that causes the segmentation fault, you will know which executable it is and the library it is trying to link. This will probably take a long time and there will be lots of output as most prelinks will probably succeed. That should enable you to open a bugzilla against prelink. Or remove the package with the executable that is causing the problem and try again. No error, you have your culprit. At least this should enable you to take the next step in resolving the issue. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
What is so indefensible about saying that I don't have a 64-bit system to create a 64-bit variant for you nor do I have the time to test more variants? As far as I can see, you want a 64-bit variant and you seem upset that I didn't volunteer my time to create that for you. Actually, I am put off by your responses, not by your legitimate point that you do not have access to a 64-bit system. Your response on 32-bit systems is puerile: there has been no claim made that a large majority of users use 32-bit systems. Actually, there is clear evidence for this. See smolt.org stats for example. No question, but the line you took out from my response says that there is no way you can measure interest in 64-bit or other LXDE since there is no way this can be gauged since it is not provided. I fail to see how everyone with his/her own private remixes/spins can contribute to the building of an official Fedora remix/spin. It is fairly easy, take the kickstart file, do your own builds and report problems or other feedback to the package maintainers and remix or spin maintainers. Yes, but the step-by-step instructions are far from clear. Also, I would perhaps add some of my own rpms that i believe should be in... Arrogance and whim are not good open-source values: they are best left behind for the closed-source worldas is appropriation which is sort of how windoze started You have thrown such accusations at me before for no good reason. This course of discussion is not constructive. I suggest you use your energy in a better way. Good! I guess we agree that these are not good values. Rahul Ps: Your mail client doesn't line wrap properly. This is the virtues of using a commercial mailer... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
Yes, but the step-by-step instructions are far from clear. Also, I would perhaps add some of my own rpms that i believe should be in... What is not clear? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD If you have specific questions, feel free to ask. 1. I guess I need F11 running to use your ks? 2. Do I also need all those rpms in the ks installed? 3. Do I need to put in your ks in the /usr/share/spin-kickstarts? Or provide the path to the file in the --config option? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, gil...@altern.org wrote: Jussi Lehtola wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 01:10 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote: I'm still having problems downloading from liberty.edu . Ex, installing kdenlive: Check that you have the mirrorlist enabled in the /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*.repo files and install yum-fastestmirror. You and Leo provide together a very complete answer, but yours would be the easiest for newbies, mainly that once installed yum-fastestmirror is enabled by default in less /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf [main] enabled=1 verbose=0 always_print_best_host = true socket_timeout=3 hostfilepath=/var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt maxhostfileage=10 maxthreads=15 Why isn't this the default? From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/SoftwareManagementGuide/CustomizingYum#Fastest_Mirror_Plugin Fastest Mirror Plugin Yum in Fedora uses a dynamic server side mirror management infrastructure that distributes the bandwidth consumptions on each of these mirrors by automatically directing the update to one of the geographically closest mirrors. This mirror is automatically checked against the master server for consistency. The fastest mirror plugin enhances the speed of updates by maintaining a local offline hostfile cache of the speed of the mirrors. It sorts the mirror list by speed and prioritizes the faster ones for package downloads. This plugin is not installed by default. For installing it, use the following command or from the Applications menu use Add/Remove Software. Let us know if liberty.edu is picked by fastestmirror. I'm betting that it does. (There are only 21 public mirrors listed for rpmfusion and mirrors.liberty.edu is the fastest and closest geographically to you.) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/11/2009 11:54 PM, Globe Trotter wrote: What is not clear? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD If you have specific questions, feel free to ask. 1. I guess I need F11 running to use your ks? Yes. That would be the easiest way to do it. 2. Do I also need all those rpms in the ks installed? livecd-creator will download them as needed. You don't need to have them installed. Use -cache argument to not have to download it everytime. 3. Do I need to put in your ks in the /usr/share/spin-kickstarts? Or provide the path to the file in the --config option? Where you put it doesn't matter as long as you point livecd-creator to it with the config argument. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Random screen blanking -- a clue
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 11:26 -0400, Shannon McMackin wrote: On 07/10/2009 10:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: There's been a steady trickle of complaints from different folks about their screens going blank for a second, or two, after upgrading to F11. I've observed this too -- it happens on one of my laptops every couple of days, or so. I've always had the impression that, for some reason, this was the screensaver kicking in. They way that happened always gave me that idea. I'm now pretty sure that, sometimes, for some reason the screensaver kicks in even though the system is not idle. I just finished typing, and began reading something on the screen, when the screen went black about three seconds after I stopped typing. I did nothing, and the screen continued to stay black. After waiting about ten seconds, I pressed the shift key, and my desktop came back. It's the screensaver. Something's causing it to trip, when it shouldn't. Happens on my Lenovo T61. Usually just goes out for a second or 2 and then comes back. Happens on my T61 (nVidia driver) too. Last time, I just waited and it didn't return until I touched the touchpad. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F-10 nfs server to Mac client -
I have an Apple Mac OSX 10.4 box I would like to connect as a client to my F-10 nfs server. Can anyone point me to a procedure for setting up the Mac client? About all I know is that the Mac can ping the server. Most of the Mac GUI stuff leaves me wondering what to enter into the boxes. Bob -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:22:51 -0700 Konstantin Svist fry@gmail.com wrote: gil...@altern.org wrote: Why isn't this the default? Probably because it doesn't work too well. The way it works is by pinging the IPs of all mirrors to see which one has the smallest latency. In a perfect world, that would be the source you want to use, but in reality all it tells you is which mirror's firewall/etc. responds to ping fastest. What happens is the server is either lagging or becomes overloaded fast (possibly because many users are trying to update from it) so the speed goes down the drain. End result: I have 3mb download on my DSL line, but using the fastest mirror often gives me 50K (or even lower) download speed. Sometimes I end up editing the timedhosts.txt file and faking a long timeout value for the slow host. I turned it off for exactly the reason you cite above. This isn't a measure of a fastest mirror. I think it would be really great if yum would keep track of the mirrors used and the actual download rate obtained over time with each mirror. It would have to be a weighted update of speed averaging past total at past speed and current total and current speed. Then instead of always using the fastest mirror, take the top N (20?, user selectable?) fastest mirrors and share the load among them. Set a size threshold so that only files above a certain size (2 MB?, 1MB?, 500K?) are taken from the fastest mirrors, let any other files come from anywhere. If a file is 20K in size, the speed of the download isn't really relevant. This shares the load and ensures that certain servers don't get hit by everyone, thus degrading their performance and stressing them unfairly. I've thought about writing a plugin to do this, but haven't made it yet. The fastest mirror plugin would be a good template. Mostly, I have just decided to run yum manually at slack times when it doesn't matter how fast it is, and it just does its thing. On a related note, it would be nice if at some level of logging, yum printed the url of the mirror used for the download with the download rate. Then I could create my own crude version of the above algorithm just by parsing the log output and creating my own database or file with the information. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How do I switch mirror for rpmfusion?
gil...@altern.org wrote: Why isn't this the default? Probably because it doesn't work too well. The way it works is by pinging the IPs of all mirrors to see which one has the smallest latency. In a perfect world, that would be the source you want to use, but in reality all it tells you is which mirror's firewall/etc. responds to ping fastest. What happens is the server is either lagging or becomes overloaded fast (possibly because many users are trying to update from it) so the speed goes down the drain. End result: I have 3mb download on my DSL line, but using the fastest mirror often gives me 50K (or even lower) download speed. Sometimes I end up editing the timedhosts.txt file and faking a long timeout value for the slow host. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Scanning over network in Fedora 11
Am 11.07.2009 20:00, schrieb Anthony Messina: in my xinetd, my service file is sane-port not just sane (/etc/xinetd.d/sane-port) not sure if you're using tcpwrappers or not, but you may need the following in /etc/hosts.allow sane-port: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 saned: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf, the net must be uncommented. you may also need to expand your sane-port xinetd service definition. mine looks like: service sane-port { disable = no port = 6566 socket_type = stream protocol = tcp wait = no user = nobody group = nobody server = /usr/sbin/saned only_from = 192.168.2.0/24 bind = 192.168.2.3 flags = IPv4 } it all works here. -a Thanks, Anthony, I've tried your suggestions one after the other, but still no success: - rename service file - adding lines to hosts.allow (I don't use tcpwrappers anyway) - net was already uncommented in dll.conf - using you service file (with bind=192.168.2.35, which is my host's ip) Klaus -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Scanning over network in Fedora 11
On Saturday 11 July 2009 12:46:47 pm Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: I want to setup network scanning in Fedora, but no success. I try to describe my setup in a quite detailed manner: 1. My scanner works fine locally: $ scanimage -L device `snapscan:libusb:004:003' is a AGFA SNAPSCAN 1212U_2 flatbed scanner 2. I have the configured like this in /etc/sane.d/saned.conf: ... 192.168.2.0/24 localhost (my local network is 192.168.2.XXX) 3. In /etc/services ther are the proper ports listed: sane-port 6566/tcp# SANE Control Port sane-port 6566/udp# SANE Control Port 4. saned is started from xinetd, configured like this: # /etc/xinetd.d/sane # Sane network access service sane-port { disable= no socket_type = stream protocol= tcp wait= no user= kp server = /usr/sbin/saned } (kp is my user) 5. Now I try to check if saned is running properly: $ telnet localhost 6566 gives this output: Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 6. But whenever I telnet to saned remotely, even from this very machine using it's ip address, I get: Trying 192.168.2.35... Connected to 192.168.2.35. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. 7. So I ran sane in debug mode (saned -d128, with the daemon stopped), and I got the following error messages from step 6: ... [saned] saned (AF-indep+IPv6) from sane-backends 1.0.19 ready [saned] check_host: access by remote host: 192.168.2.35 [saned] check_host: remote host is not IN_LOOPBACK nor IN6_LOOPBACK [saned] check_host: local hostname: kellercomputer.kralenriede.de [saned] check_host: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname [saned] init: access by host 192.168.2.35 denied [saned] quit: exiting 8. BTW, the firewall is turned off. Now, what may have gone wrong? Any help would be greately appreciated, Klaus in my xinetd, my service file is sane-port not just sane (/etc/xinetd.d/sane-port) not sure if you're using tcpwrappers or not, but you may need the following in /etc/hosts.allow sane-port: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 saned: 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 and in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf, the net must be uncommented. you may also need to expand your sane-port xinetd service definition. mine looks like: service sane-port { disable = no port = 6566 socket_type = stream protocol = tcp wait = no user = nobody group = nobody server = /usr/sbin/saned only_from = 192.168.2.0/24 bind = 192.168.2.3 flags = IPv4 } it all works here. -a -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:24:39 -0700, Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com wrote: 2. Do I also need all those rpms in the ks installed? When building a livecd (or livedvd) image you don't need to have every package that will end up in the image installed on the system doing the build. The rpms will be needed, so if you don't have a local repo, they will need to be downloaded as part of the build process. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 2:29 PM On 07/11/2009 11:54 PM, Globe Trotter wrote: What is not clear? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD If you have specific questions, feel free to ask. 1. I guess I need F11 running to use your ks? Yes. That would be the easiest way to do it. So, is it possible to run F10 and create a F11 LiveCD? If so, how? 2. Do I also need all those rpms in the ks installed? livecd-creator will download them as needed. You don't need to have them installed. Use -cache argument to not have to download it everytime. 3. Do I need to put in your ks in the /usr/share/spin-kickstarts? Or provide the path to the file in the --config option? Where you put it doesn't matter as long as you point livecd-creator to it with the config argument. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Sage and F11
Sage worked fine for me with F10, but after a fresh install of F11, I can't get sage to start. Error messages below. Does anybody know a fix? Thanks. $ sage -- | Sage Version 4.0.2, Release Date: 2009-06-18 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| -- Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/sage/local/bin/sage-ipython, line 18, in module import IPython File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/IPython/__init__.py, line 58, in module __import__(name,glob,loc,[]) File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/IPython/ipstruct.py, line 22, in module from IPython.genutils import list2dict2 File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/IPython/genutils.py, line 59, in module from IPython.external.path import path File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/IPython/external/path.py, line 35, in module import md5 File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python/md5.py, line 6, in module from hashlib import md5 File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python/hashlib.py, line 133, in module md5 = __get_builtin_constructor('md5') File /usr/local/sage-4.0.2-linux-Fedora_release_10_Cambridge-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/python/hashlib.py, line 60, in __get_builtin_constructor import _md5 ImportError: No module named _md5 -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Scanning over network in Fedora 11
Am 11.07.2009 20:14, schrieb Sam Varshavchik: The DNS lookup for kellercomputer.kralenriede.de failed. You need to fix your DNS. Thanks, Sam, I even had it (kellercomputer) in my /etc/hosts file, but not the fully qualified host name. Adding this finally solved it. There are lots of ways to go wrong ... Klaus -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Triple boot windows, fedora, and rawhide
I dual boot windows and fedora a normal basis and have no problems with it getting setup. What I would like to do now, is to setup a triple boot as mentioned in subject line. That can be one of two ways, installing rawhide itself (problems lately and am watching for installing to be fixed), or to install F11 and update to rawhide. Now, I have never dual booted linuxes before, so this is the part I don't understand how or what to do to get this right. I tried this morning doing this and sort of got it working, but few things I couldn't figure out and have since resetup just dual boot windows and F11. So, questions I would have to understand is this, and beware that I already have space ready for install. Anyway, what I guess I need to know is... 1 - When going to install F11 (again) or rawhide, should either detect my current windows/linux installs and ask to install grub and include those stanzas? (Neither detected the other, maybe still rewrite problems for storage at this stage for this stuff?) 2 - Even if not detected how do I add the missing stanza and is it basically same already ahve just with diff partitions and kernel versions? 3 - Which grub is installed to mbr and is the other installed to the 1st partition of it's install or what? What should the mbr config and the 1st partitions look like? 4 - Should the two installs share /boot dirs so they can read the kernels and auto update grub.conf when needed? How does that work if not? P.S. I have been googling this (maybe I am wording it wrong) and not getting real good info to explain my best course of action. Am still googling now to keep trying but am exhausting my efforts. Thanks ahead of time, -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, User, etc.. miketc...@fedoraproject.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F11 (Thpd T30) : reproducible display loss
To my great satisfaction, it became possible shortly before the release of F11 to run two of my four legacy suites of proprietary GPS/ topo map software under wine.The two suites I prefer (Garmin's own and one of Maptech's) now install, launch, and run -- and most of them usually do the crucial function, transferring data to and from my GPSs. (Details in a June 29th post here, titled Mappery : uncertain success with Fedora/Wine/Garmin) There is a snag, though. Disclaimer : what I know of hardware would go in a gnat's eye, comfortably. I have a T30 Thinkpad, into which a hardware-savvy young friend recently put a new hard drive -- one I had bought from a friend, who thought it to have 70 GB; df -h tells me it has 228 GB. The machine is running Fedora 11, on which I have installed Garmin's TOPOUS2008 under Wine. This combination on three of my four PCs not only launches and runs, but also transfers data to and from my Garmin GPSs. It launches and runs on a T42, too -- and used to talk to the GPS, but doesn't now. At first, when I launched the map software on the T30, either by mouse or from the CLI, it churned a moment, then the monitor went black, and failed to respond discernibly to anything except holding down the power button. I've been told I may need to update the BIOS, but I get lost trying to follow the directions for doing that at http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/MIGR-45745.html (the BIOS update page). Yesterday evening, I tried launching the map software again (which is always very slow to launch). I *think* I did it on the T30, but from the CLI instead of the mouse, by cp from the launcher to the CLI; the up arrow gets me the command: env WINEPREFIX=/home/ btth/.wine wine C:\Garmin\MapSource.exe The screen soon went black. One of the several LEDs near the power button stayed lit. I thought, wrongly I now believe, that it simply indicated the presence of wall power. (It looks like a circle containing either a Z or an N, rotated 45 degrees.) I waited a while, then hit the power button and waited again. Nothing visible happened. I held the power button down, for what seemed a very long time. Finally the LED turned off. I hit the power button again; nothing happened; I waited a while, and hit it yet again. This time the T30 booted up. I left it at the F11 login screen. This morning, without logging into the T30, I did ssh -X into it from my #1 PC, the one I'm on now. Then I gave the env WINEPREFIX=/home/btth/.wine wine C:\Garmin\MapSource.exe command again -- expecting the T30 to crash, but possibly send me interesting messages as it did. It didn't crash. It opened the same map display as on this machine (which I had opened by cp with the same command.) It gave these messages : [b...@hbsk2 ~]$ ssh -X 192.168.1.109 b...@192.168.1.109's password: Last login: Sun Jul 5 16:23:53 2009 from 192.168.1.102 [b...@thpd30 ~]$ env WINEPREFIX=/home/btth/.wine wine C:\Garmin\MapSource.exe fixme:bitblt:X11DRV_ClientSideDIBCopy potential optimization: pixel format conversion err:imagelist:IMAGELIST_InternalExpandBitmaps creating new image bitmap (x=23904 y=24)! fixme:bitblt:X11DRV_ClientSideDIBCopy potential optimization: pixel format conversion (Meanwhile, by comparison, PC #1 was showing these messages : [b...@hbsk2 ~]$ env WINEPREFIX=/home/btth/.wine wine C:\Garmin\MapSource.exe fixme:bitblt:X11DRV_ClientSideDIBCopy potential optimization: pixel format conversion fixme:bitblt:X11DRV_ClientSideDIBCopy potential optimization: pixel format conversion) I turned on a GPS, which was still connected to the serial port on the T30, and started trying to transfer data in to the T30. It didn't see the GPS. I edited preferences, trying com1 through com8 (!) and the auto setting (before and after the com ports); no joy, and in fact no response, except what I'd've gotten without any GPS. But the T30 still didn't crash, and the map display is still open and working usably on one of my PC#1 workspaces -- just like the one native to PC #1. I have that open also, on the same workspace. The only difference I find between them is that the native one says merely Untitled - MapSource across the top, while the other adds a parenthesis (on Thpd30.localdomain) I took this to mean that it's not the map software itself that's the problem, but its demands on X. Does that make sense? After a while, I closed the display from the T30, but not the ssh -X link -- nor the plain ssh link I also had open to it. Then I logged into the T30 from its keyboard, and launched the map program again. Today, after a reboot, the T30 now does launch and run the topo software, on its own display. That fails to see either of my GPSs, and to find them if I tell it to. It does zoom, pan, and do most of its usual things. If I try to
Re: Bluetooth under KDE - anyone running this?
Timothy Murphy wrote: As far as I can see, it is impossible to run bluez under Fedora/KDE, since there is no way of pairing devices. KDEBluetooth4 didn't do anything under F-10; under F-11 it crashes. Rawhide works fine for me. Have you tried with it? http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora-test/Fedora-Unity- Desktop-20090706-rawhide-Live-i386.iso Thanks for the response, I'm just burning that ISO and will see how it goes. It make me think I could also try the Fedora-11 Gnome Live CD. Unfortunately my CD writer decreed that the Fedora Unity ISO was too large. In the end I installed the standard (Gnome) Live CD, and I had no problem pairing my phone, and generally using Bluetooth. It's a pity one has to use Gnome to do this. If KDE can't get kdebluetooth working, I would have thought just putting the bluetooth key in a file would be a simple solution. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/12/2009 12:36 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: So, is it possible to run F10 and create a F11 LiveCD? If so, how? It should be possible using febootstrap. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/ I haven't tried that. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F11 dual boot on Samsung NC10 - BEWARE - a nasty shock!
If anyone is installing F11 on a Samsung NC10 netbook I just had a nasty surprise which I felt any other NC10 owner would want to know about. I had installed F11 perfectly well on this netbook using a usbkey. I had only booted to F11 until this evening, when I decided to boot XP as part of the dual boot check - this is where I had a nasty surprise - instead of booting to XP it started booting the recovery partition!! I waited until it offered me the option of accepting the re-install options (For Windows XP), and then chose to shutdown instead using the option offered. It was easy to fix after booting back to F11 - see below - but you need to be aware of this install fault before getting to this position! During the install anaconda had detected the recover partition and entered the Windows section of /boot/grub/grub.conf with the wrong partition definition. The fix was simple - change the line (hd0,0) to (hd0,1) in grub.conf and all is well - however you should check the grub.conf file produced immediately after the install to see what has been entered. I have not yet checked bugzilla but this is a bad fault in the install system, and should be fixed. I hope no-one else has been affected by this. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/F11-dual-boot-on-Samsung-NC10---BEWARE---a-nasty-shock%21-tp24443653p24443653.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: cups configuration
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 09:28 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: François Patte wrote: Bonjour, I want to configure cups on laptops so that people could add any printer they want, and choose the default printer they want too. I don't want to give them the root password. What is possible, using the web interface, is to allow anybody to remove tasks, even if they are not the owner of the task. I want also that these permissions to add and choose the default printer, will be be limited to the laptop only, I mean: if the laptop is connected to a network, I don't want that these persmissions could be automatically extended to any other cups server on the network. Is this possible? And how? It is already possible for each user to select their own default printer. In Gnome, it is System -- Preferences -- Hardware -- Default Printer. As far as giving permission to add/remove/change printers, you can add the user to the system group. This will basically give full access. Or you can add them to /etc/cups/cups.conf in the Require user section of the desired access.-- It looks to me that more changes would be needed. At least I conclude that from the folllowing section of the cupsd.conf file: # All administration operations require an administrator to authenticate... Limit CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer CUPS-Delete-Printer CUPS-Add-Modify-Class CUPS-Delete-Class CUPS-Set-Default CUPS-Get-Devices AuthType Default Require user @SYSTEM Order deny,allow /Limit -- === Wouldn't this be a great world if being insecure and desperate were a turn-on? -- Broadcast News === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: From: Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix To: Globe Trotter itsme_...@yahoo.com Cc: encouragement and advice for using Fedora.Community assistance fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 4:31 PM On 07/12/2009 12:36 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: So, is it possible to run F10 and create a F11 LiveCD? If so, how? It should be possible using febootstrap. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/febootstrap/ Where does one put in the ks file? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Triple boot windows, fedora, and rawhide
Mike Chambers wrote: 1 - When going to install F11 (again) or rawhide, should either detect my current windows/linux installs and ask to install grub and include those stanzas? (Neither detected the other, maybe still rewrite problems for storage at this stage for this stuff?) 2 - Even if not detected how do I add the missing stanza and is it basically same already ahve just with diff partitions and kernel versions? 3 - Which grub is installed to mbr and is the other installed to the 1st partition of it's install or what? What should the mbr config and the 1st partitions look like? 4 - Should the two installs share /boot dirs so they can read the kernels and auto update grub.conf when needed? How does that work if not? The way I've always handled test installs is to have their installers put GRUB in their partition boot sectors. Then in the primary installation's grub.conf I have stanzas like: title rawhide on sda7 root (hd0,6) chainloader +1 title Test OS on sda8 root (hd0,7) chainloader +1 Booting one of those gets you to a new GRUB with whatever menu the installer put there. This way the main grub.conf doesn't have to be touched when something new gets installed or a kernel gets updated on one of those partitions. The only downside I've found is that preupgrade won't work on one of those chainloaded partitions. Not really a big deal once you realize what the problem is. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: 64-bit LXDE spin/remix
On 07/12/2009 02:10 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: Where does one put in the ks file? Not sure I understand the question. You can use any path. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: mailing list pgp signatures...
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 12:05 -0400, David wrote: On 7/10/2009 11:34 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: On 07/10/09 18:47, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson: David, one way to solve the problem is to write a filter rule that sends g's messages directly to trash. New entry in my access file From:gel...@bellsouth.net REJECT 553 PGP signing with no public key. For some reason this has not made it to the list. I apologize if this shows up twice. I was trying to advise him that he should do the correct thing. I failed at that. His GunPG signature is a waste of time, his time and my time, since it can not be verified that it is even his signature. I did not want to /null/void his posts. With his 'nasty' reply he has given me no other choice. His posts will now be deleted directly from the email server before downloading. Sad thing about that is that if, in the future, he should decide to use GnuPG properly I'll never know. BTW. You did notice that I made no comment on his excessively long and rambling 'signature'. :-) I am confused about the brouhaha over the signature that g sent. When I get his message in evolution there is just as single line saying he has signed his message. This bothers me not at all. I assume something more annoying happens with other mail programs.. What is it that happens that annoys people so much -- === Old age is too high a price to pay for maturity. === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines