Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Chris wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:07:18 -0500 (EST)
> "Robert P. J. Day"  wrote:
>
>   
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jatin K wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> not able to download ISO from given link :-(
>>>   
>>   can everyone please take some drugs and chill out?  while you
>> *might* find an accommodating mirror right now, it won't be official,
>> as you can read here:
>>
>>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/Schedule
>>
>> Time of Release
>>
>> Historically Test and General Availability releases happen at 10:00am
>> Eastern US Time, which is either 1500UTC or 1400UTC depending on
>> daylight savings in the United States.
>>
>>  so how about we not spend the next several hours playing "where's
>> waldo?"
>> 
>
> Who's Waldo?!
>
>   
That's a different game...

-- 
Wagner's music is better than it sounds. -- Mark Twain Guess Who!
http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Alpine paragraph justification failing

2009-11-16 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier
| From: Beartooth 
| 
|   Many times, when I hit ^J amid text in compose mode, it merely 
| makes a mess; and trying to mitigate that only keeps making it worse.
| 
|   This is with Alpine 2.0 under Fedora 11; I haven't yet managed to 
| spot a pattern in when it happens.

There is a slight chance that this is due to the screen not matching
what the buffer contains.

Here's how you might be able to tell:

- type control-Z to suspend (assuming your settings allow you to do
  this)

- type the shell command "clear" to clear the screen

- type the shell command "fg" to get back to alpine

Is the text still a mess?  The same mess?  If so, the buffer and the
screen do match.

If not, you might have a curses problem (curses is the library that
handles "full screen" manipulations of text-based terminals).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Chris
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:07:18 -0500 (EST)
"Robert P. J. Day"  wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jatin K wrote:
> 
> > not able to download ISO from given link :-(
> 
>   can everyone please take some drugs and chill out?  while you
> *might* find an accommodating mirror right now, it won't be official,
> as you can read here:
> 
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/Schedule
> 
> Time of Release
> 
> Historically Test and General Availability releases happen at 10:00am
> Eastern US Time, which is either 1500UTC or 1400UTC depending on
> daylight savings in the United States.
> 
>  so how about we not spend the next several hours playing "where's
> waldo?"

Who's Waldo?!

-- 
Best regards,

Chris

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

"There's no place like 127.0.0.1"

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Jatin K wrote:

> not able to download ISO from given link :-(

  can everyone please take some drugs and chill out?  while you
*might* find an accommodating mirror right now, it won't be official,
as you can read here:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/12/Schedule

Time of Release

Historically Test and General Availability releases happen at 10:00am
Eastern US Time, which is either 1500UTC or 1400UTC depending on
daylight savings in the United States.

 so how about we not spend the next several hours playing "where's
waldo?"

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Upcoming IRC Class tomorrow! (2009-11-17)

2009-11-16 Thread Suvayu Ali

On Monday 16 November 2009 10:07 PM, Tim wrote:

Tim:

This is confusing.  Are you saying that time is a UTC time?


Kevin Fenzi:

Yes. All Classroom times are in UTC.


Okay.  I would have written "UTC" next to the time and date, just to
make it quickly obvious...  As the website does (I didn't think to check
that, until after posting, as is the usual mistake we make).


Use 'date -u' to see your current time in UTC.


There's another command incantation, that I always forget, to do the
reverse, and gives a result easier for us humans to understand:  Enter
the advertised UTC time&  date for something, to find out the local time
it will occur.



date -d 'string'

--
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Jatin K

On 11/17/2009 11:47 AM, Germán Racca wrote:

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:33 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
   

On 11/17/2009 10:16 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
 

On 11/16/2009 11:39 PM, Steven Stern wrote:

   

On 11/16/2009 10:07 PM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:

 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:

   


 

Greetings,

I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!


 


 

Chris:
If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.

   


 

-- cmg

   

The torrent is dated today (11/16/09).

 

The CHECKSUM files in the i386, ppc, and x86_64 torrents are the same as
those for RC4.  The RC4 install ISOs are in fact dated 11/9, although
their CHECKSUM files weren't signed until the 12th.



   

Can any one give me the link to download FC12 64bit DVD  on
fedoraproject.org it says that 1 day remaining !!!

--
°v°
   /(_)\
^ ^  Jatin Khatri

No MS

 

You can use the mirror list at fedoraproject.org:

http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/12/

Germán.

   

not able to download ISO from given link :-(

--
  °v°
 /(_)\
  ^ ^  Jatin Khatri

No MS

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Germán Racca
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 11:33 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
> On 11/17/2009 10:16 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > On 11/16/2009 11:39 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/16/2009 10:07 PM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> >>  
> >>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
> >>>
> >>  
>  Greetings,
> 
>  I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
> 
>   
> >>  
> >>> Chris:
> >>> If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
> >>> could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
> >>> there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
> >>> for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
> >>>
> >>  
> >>> -- cmg
> >>>
> >>
> >> The torrent is dated today (11/16/09).
> >>  
> > The CHECKSUM files in the i386, ppc, and x86_64 torrents are the same as
> > those for RC4.  The RC4 install ISOs are in fact dated 11/9, although
> > their CHECKSUM files weren't signed until the 12th.
> >
> >
> >
> Can any one give me the link to download FC12 64bit DVD  on 
> fedoraproject.org it says that 1 day remaining !!!
> 
> -- 
>°v°
>   /(_)\
>^ ^  Jatin Khatri
> 
> No MS
> 
You can use the mirror list at fedoraproject.org:

http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/12/

Germán.

-- 
Germán A. Racca
National Institute for Space Research (INPE)
São José dos Campos - SP - Brasil
http://gracca.wordpress.com
http://tinyurl.com/SkyTux

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XBMC for Fedora

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 20:01 +0100, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> P.S. I'm using Thunderbird, and don't know how to suppress the HTML 
> formatting. I appologize.

For what it's worth, I didn't see any HTML.  Either you succeeded, or
the list is, wonderfully, converting...

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Upcoming IRC Class tomorrow! (2009-11-17)

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
Tim:
>> This is confusing.  Are you saying that time is a UTC time?

Kevin Fenzi:
> Yes. All Classroom times are in UTC. 

Okay.  I would have written "UTC" next to the time and date, just to
make it quickly obvious...  As the website does (I didn't think to check
that, until after posting, as is the usual mistake we make).

> Use 'date -u' to see your current time in UTC. 

There's another command incantation, that I always forget, to do the
reverse, and gives a result easier for us humans to understand:  Enter
the advertised UTC time & date for something, to find out the local time
it will occur.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Jatin K

On 11/17/2009 10:16 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:

On 11/16/2009 11:39 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
   

On 11/16/2009 10:07 PM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
   
 

Greetings,

I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!

 
 

Chris:
If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
   
 

-- cmg
   


The torrent is dated today (11/16/09).
 

The CHECKSUM files in the i386, ppc, and x86_64 torrents are the same as
those for RC4.  The RC4 install ISOs are in fact dated 11/9, although
their CHECKSUM files weren't signed until the 12th.


   
Can any one give me the link to download FC12 64bit DVD  on 
fedoraproject.org it says that 1 day remaining !!!


--
  °v°
 /(_)\
  ^ ^  Jatin Khatri

No MS

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 20:21 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I'm old-school Unix where the only way some things could be fixed was
> to su to root and it was just easier for big tasks to log in as root.

As has been pointed out, it's rarely necessary.  There's one area where
I a graphical root user is useful, mass file managing where you can't
use wild cards to do the job.  But you don't need to log in graphically
as root to do these things.  Find a decent file manager, not Nautilus,
then just start it off from the command line.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:05 -0500, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> I had a stream at PBS stutter then stop dead in its tracks 10 minutes
> before the end. Sometimes, somewhere else, just changing the screen
> size killed the video.

Yes, I've had ones stall and never recover.  It might be because the
site has a timeout, that has timed out during the stall.  But it could
be just plain broken.

> OTOH, I find The Warning, Inside the Meltdown and Breaking the Bank to
> be top of the top class documentaries and I'd like to contribute a few
> dollars. But I really don't believe in giving away my credit card
> number on the net. I only use my credit card to pay my ISP. I'm old
> fashion, I suppose.
>  
> Do you people use your credit card on the net?

Yes, but with caution.  There are some services that I'd be fairly
confident in using, but I'd be extremely hesitant about giving credit
card details to just any site.

I'd look for a third party to go in the middle.  e.g. Put money into
PayPal (if you trust them, and they can accept PayPal), then use PayPal
to pay the other site.

Or do a direct bank transfer, where all the other person gets is money
sent to them under your control.  They've no way to raid more off you.

Some credit card companies offer one-time features, where you have a
single use credit feature, a bit like gift cards in shops.  You put
money into the single-use credit, the right amount, then use that with
the purchase.

Best advice:  Don't ask *us* about this, contact your bank, or credit
card supplier, and see what they advise and can offer you.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: run anaconda to install to second hard drive

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 22:15 -0700, idwsh6...@sneakemail.com wrote:
> I'm running F11 and I'd like to run anaconda to install another
> instance of F11 to a second (blank) hard drive in my system. I'd like
> to do it without rebooting. The second drive is removable.

Just to throw some other ideas into the ring, you could clone the
installed drive over to the second one.  Though, bear in mind that if
you're going to use this second drive to run Fedora on another computer,
there may be significant enough hardware differences between this
computer and that computer, that you need to do the install on the
computer it will run on.  That, or tweak it about.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Changing GRUB

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 19:32 -0500, Linux Newbie wrote:
> When I turn my system on GRUB displays the message "Press any key to
> enter the menu" then a couple of blank lines and then the default OS
> and countdown timer.  I would like to remove the "Press any key..."
> and two blank lines and display just the default OS and countdown
> timer.  I looked in the grub.conf file and it's not there.  Does
> anyone know how to remove these three lines?

You could take away / comment out the "hiddenmenu" line.  That will
remove the hop, skip, and a jump, approach down to being just one page.
Though that page will be the menu of choices in a box, with a graphic
background.  You can change the graphic, if you want to.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


run anaconda to install to second hard drive

2009-11-16 Thread idwsh6b02
I'm running F11 and I'd like to run anaconda to install another
instance of F11 to a second (blank) hard drive in my system. I'd like
to do it without rebooting. The second drive is removable.

What's the magic?

Just running anaconda spits out:

Code:

OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/mnt/runtime/usr/sbin'

So it seems I have to do some prep work to get things "ready" for
anaconda.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Andre Robatino
On 11/17/2009 12:01 AM, Chris wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:07:20 -0500
> Carroll Grigsby  wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
>>>
>>
>> Chris:
>> If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
>> could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
>> there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
>> for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
>>
>> -- cmg
>>
> 
> Meh - this seems to be true. I went ahead and installed from the ISO
> anyways. The only thing I can see that might reflect the release is
> issue.net
> 
> Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

The CHECKSUM files on the NZ server are those for RC4 == Final.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Chris
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:07:20 -0500
Carroll Grigsby  wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
> 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
> > 
> 
> Chris:
> If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
> could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
> there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
> for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
> 
> -- cmg
> 

Meh - this seems to be true. I went ahead and installed from the ISO
anyways. The only thing I can see that might reflect the release is
issue.net

Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

-- 
Best regards,

Chris

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

"There's no place like 127.0.0.1"

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: minor problems with Audio CD fix from Bug 514213

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Allen Newell
I am pinging this message out again as I haven't heard anything. I want 
to have more info about a DVD that clobbers a drive in F11 and need help 
in getting the necessary info to submit a bug.


Thanks in advance,
Paul

Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I just upgrade to 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.i686.PAE and everything else yum 
gave me today and confirmed that most of my issues have been fixed (a 
big thanks to Harald et al for getting this done !!!)


I just logged two more bugs related to a couple things that didn't 
happen with it.


Bug #537740: if one is using a CD-ROM instead of DVD drive, the 
icon/drive/mount doesn't get killed but it still doesn't see that 
there is media loaded


Bug #537741: the system still doesn't see that it has a floppy drive 
and loading a floppy does nothing (this works in f9)


I have one more bug to log, but need a bit of help to submit it.

I have a DVD that I can play in my DVD player. If I put it in my f11 
system, it not only kills the icon (and I suspect unmounts the drive 
and all sorts of other stuff), it actually totally kills the drive and 
I cannot eject the disk. The only way to get it out is a reboot and to 
push the button once the reboot has started after the current session 
has died.


I have tried every other DVD I can find and don't get this behavior. I 
think I need to supply info about "what the heck this DVD is", but 
would like some advice about what/how to query to give enough info to 
make a bug submission meaningful. I've got Linux f11 and f9 plus 
Windows XP to do querying.


Thanks in advance,
Paul



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Andre Robatino
On 11/16/2009 11:39 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 11/16/2009 10:07 PM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
> 
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
>>>
> 
>> Chris:
>> If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
>> could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
>> there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
>> for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
> 
>> -- cmg
> 
> 
> The torrent is dated today (11/16/09).

The CHECKSUM files in the i386, ppc, and x86_64 torrents are the same as
those for RC4.  The RC4 install ISOs are in fact dated 11/9, although
their CHECKSUM files weren't signed until the 12th.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/16/2009 10:07 PM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:
> 
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
>>
> 
> Chris:
> If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
> could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
> there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
> for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.
> 
> -- cmg
> 

The torrent is dated today (11/16/09).

- -- 

  Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksCKPoACgkQeERILVgMyvBVvwCdHYIslMVg6FrAOT2qEn7J4jTG
XT0An09g8aLHSsJQsSRf2BqwoqIOd/Bf
=1U6f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Allen Newell

Daniel J Walsh wrote:

On 11/16/2009 12:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
  


Paul SELinux policy can not be written in such a way to allow you to run X 
Windows as root.

The problem is too many Applications require rights to write to the homedir and 
we want to treat /root differently then /home.
Allow an confined application to write to /root would allow it to do evil stuff 
by replacing /root/.bashrc for example.

And the next time an admin logged in the script would run.  


If you require running X as root then you will need to put SELinux into 
permissive mode.  In F12 we are now preventing users from logging in as root 
from GDM because it is so dangerous from a security point of view.

Imagine running firefox as root and what problems it can cause.

  

Daniel:

This is a very good explanation of why I should not be logging in and 
running X Windows as root. I obviously needed a few lectures on this 
forum to help beat it in and I am glad I got them.


Paul

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Allen Newell

Marko Vojinovic wrote:

On Monday 16 November 2009 05:47:43 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
  

I am not certain why I would want to
disable SELinux as it clearly is part of the Fedora package and is
trying to tell me that something isn't right.



Good thinking. You definitely do not want to disable SELinux. It is there for 
a good reason, even if one doesn't know the details of what that reason is.
 
  
Yes, I know I should not start X server or login as root ... 



So why did you do it then? Disabled root GUI is also the default for a reason, 
just as SELinux. They are multiple protective layers that try to secure your 
system from any malicious activity, including your own.


  

and that is
not my normal work habit. But I would expect that I should still be able
to do such and not have SELinux bark unless there was something wrong.
It is the "what is wrong" that I am trying to understand and correct.



What is wrong (technically) is you moving files across directories without 
changing their SELinux context appropriately. At least that appears so based 
on the info you provided.


However...

What is wrong (essentially) is precisely logging in as root in a GUI. This is 
disabled by default in Fedora, and SELinux policy assumes you run the default 
configuration. Once you enabled root GUI and started poking around in it, it 
was just a matter of time before SELinux starts yelling at you doing this or 
that wrong. I cannot tell exactly what SELinux is complaining about until you 
provide some setroubleshoot info, but it is definitely because you logged in a 
GUI as root, played around with things and then did something SELinux doesn't 
like. And it will keep happening over and over unless you stop using root GUI.


If you are more familiar with Windows world, this would be like logging in 
with admin privileges, disabling antivirus software and automatic updates, and 
then asking "why does the system keep alerting me that security might be 
compromised?". Well, you compromised it.


So much for understanding.

As for correcting the error, I can advise the following:

1) Find all files that you have been mv-ing as root, and move them back to 
their original location.

2) Stop using root GUI.
3) Learn that mv keeps SELinux labels in contrast to cp which changes them 
appropriately. Understand that this is intentional feature of mv and cp. The 
file and directory labels are displayed by "ll -Z".
4) Whenever you need root access use "su -" to log in as root, or learn to 
configure and use sudo. Use only your normal user account for GUI.
5) For regular system administration you don't even need to use su and sudo, 
because the system should ask you for the root password whenever you start a 
GUI app that needs elevated privileges.
6) If SELinux keeps complaining more, learn how to use setroubleshoot utility 
and post the output here on the list. People will help you correct it all, but 
only after you make sure not to produce any more problems by using root GUI.


HTH.

Best, :-)
Marko

  

Marko:

Appreciate the reply.

The information provided about SELinux context is what I was trying to 
understand. I am sufficiently newbie to not really understand what 
SELinux is doing and, given your info and the post about "SELinux is 
preventing the gdm-session-wor from using potentially mislabeled

files (.dmrc)." make it very obvious what I did to incur the warnings.

I now can backtrack my actions and see what I did wrong. Lesson learned 
regarding SELinux labels.


This upcoming weekend, I will go back and su to root to correct using 
the suggestions you provided.


There is a strong temptation to defend my logging in as root just like a 
child defends an indefensible action. So, to you and everyone who said 
"don't do it", I have no defense. I'm not from a Windows world, I'm 
old-school Unix where the only way some things could be fixed was to su 
to root and it was just easier for big tasks to log in as root. No 
excuse for that now, but old habits die hard. Once again, no defense on 
my part ... I've offered my lame reason just to show its lame.


Thanks,
Paul


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:22 -0600, Chris wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
> 

Chris:
If you're talking about the site ftp.wicks.co.nz (the only NZ repo I
could find from the Get Fedora pages), be cautions. The file dates
there are about a week old (11/09/09), whereas the file dates
for the RC4 release are 11/12/09.

-- cmg

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Compiling a i386 kernel on a x64 system.

2009-11-16 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Found solution from a Debian List to use linux32 command.

On 15 Nov 2009 at 23:22, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:

From:   "Michael D. Setzer II" 
To: Paulo Cavalcanti , "Community 
assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." 
Date sent:  Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:22:34 +1000
Priority:   normal
Copies to:  Subject:Re: Compiling a i386 kernel on 
a x64 
system.
Send reply to:  "Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." 
and advice for using Fedora." 



> The kernel has nothing to do with a fedora system, other than that I build 
> the 
> kernels on my fedora machine, and have done so with fedora for many 
> version.
> 
> The kernels build are single standalone files for use with the g4l project 
> and 
> its boot process. Here is part of the isolinux.cfg file that loads the 
> various 
> kernels that can be used on various hardware combinations.
> 
> LABEL bz20.4
> MENU LABEL ^A: bz20.4 386 build 2.6.20.1 02-21-2007
> KERNEL bz20.4
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 noacpi
> LABEL bz21.6
> MENU LABEL ^B: bz21.6 386 build 2.6.21.6 07-04-2007
> KERNEL bz21.6
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 noacpi
> LABEL bz22.6
> MENU LABEL ^C: bz22.6 386 build 2.6.22.6 08-31-2007
> KERNEL bz22.6
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 noacpi
> LABEL bz23.14
> MENU LABEL ^D: bz23.14 386 build 2.6.23.1 01-14-2008
> KERNEL bz23.14
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 noacpi
> LABEL bz24.4
> MENU LABEL ^E: bz24.4 386 build 2.6.24.4 03-24-2008
> KERNEL bz24.4
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 noacpi
> LABEL bz25.10
> MENU LABEL ^F: bz25.10 386 build 07-03-2008
> KERNEL bz25.10
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0
> LABEL bz26.6
> MENU LABEL ^G: bz26.6 386 build 10-09-2008 
> KERNEL bz26.6
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> LABEL bz27.10
> MENU LABEL ^H: bz27.10 386 build 12-18-2008 
> KERNEL bz27.10
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> LABEL bz28.8
> MENU LABEL ^I: bz28.8 386 build 03-17-2009  
> KERNEL bz28.8
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> LABEL bz29.4
> MENU LABEL ^J: bz29.4 386 build 05-20-2009  
> KERNEL bz29.4
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> LABEL bz30.9
> MENU LABEL ^K: bz30.9 386 build 10-05-2009  
> KERNEL bz30.9
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> LABEL bz31.6
> MENU DEFAULT
> MENU LABEL ^L: bz31.6 386 build 11-10-2009  
> KERNEL bz31.6
> APPEND initrd=ramdisk.gz ramdisk_size=65536 root=/dev/ram0 
> 
> Most hardware works with the latest kernel, but some hardware doesn't, but 
> works with older ones? I have an average of about 10,000 downloads per 
> month of the project, so don't know all the hardware people use.
> 
> With my all past changes of the Fedora core to the next level, it is just 
> copying the .config from the last build to the new system with the latest 
> kernel.org and building it. I've used the processor option just over the 486 
> to 
> provide largest level of hardware support. Didn't see a noticable preformance 
> increase using a higher processor in the builds. 
> 
> With the Phenom II system, a build of the kernel with the same .config 
> prompts for changes, and one is for the processor, and it provides only 64 
> bit 
> options. I'm looking on how to be able to build a kernel in the same fashion. 
> As I mentioned earlier, the new machine can build a kernel from scratch in 
> about 12 minutes, but it would then only work on an x64 CPU. The x86 
> kernels work for both, and have even used one of the x86 kernels on the x64 
> machine to do a backup.
> 
> Perhaps there is some extra things that need to be loaded or configured to 
> allow this.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Alan Cox had mentioned that this can be done, and I had tried to send a 
> message directly to his address, but got no response. I know one of the 
> kernel developers is Alan Cox, but may not be the same one.
> 
> +--+
>   Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
>   Guam Community College  Computer Center  
>   mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
>   mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
>   http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
>   Guam - Where America's Day Begins
> +--+
> 
> http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
> Number of Seti Units Returned: 

Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Greshko  wrote:
>
>   
>> That said, I gave you a start for saving those movie clips.
>> 
>
> You mean this?
>
> ./rtmpdump_x86 -r
> "rtmp://203.77.184.132/a1863/o6/tp-live/PBS_CP_General_Audience/cosby-full-revised-CHN.mp4"
> -o outfile.mp4
>   
Sorry  That wasn't the movie clip.  That was the PBS video you
referenced in:

http://video.pbs.org/video/1082087546/

> The problem is that, here, you have the whole path and the name of the
> file to stream, which you don't have in the case of the CBC, BBC, PBS,
> etc.
>
>   
As I said, it isn't easy or simple.

In order to learn
"tp-live/PBS_CP_General_Audience/cosby-full-revised-CHN.mp4"  you have
to use tcpdump or wireshark to capture the IP packets and then look at
them to find the information.  The a1863/o6 string is also part of the
RTMP protocol that you need to determine.  That info is also in the IP
packets but seems to be the same for all PBS videos.

So, that is what you need to do for PBS.

For BBC, you should investigate get_iplayer or iplayer. 

For CBC, you need to do your own research.

The bottom line is what I said earlier.  Each media provider uses their
own version of middle ware.  So, for each media provider you need to dig
in and figure it out.  I've done that for you for PBS and BBC with the
help of google as well as my own understanding of IP packet capture.


-- 
Paul's Law: You can't fall off the floor. Guess Who!
http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: SCP works one way only

2009-11-16 Thread Konstantin Svist

On 11/16/2009 05:51 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:

Try disabling iptables (service iptables stop) and try again.


Doesn't make a difference

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Greshko  wrote:

> That said, I gave you a start for saving those movie clips.

You mean this?

./rtmpdump_x86 -r
"rtmp://203.77.184.132/a1863/o6/tp-live/PBS_CP_General_Audience/cosby-full-revised-CHN.mp4"
-o outfile.mp4

The problem is that, here, you have the whole path and the name of the
file to stream, which you don't have in the case of the CBC, BBC, PBS,
etc.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: SCP works one way only

2009-11-16 Thread Rick Stevens

On 11/16/2009 03:24 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:

For some reason, I can only SCP files off my new NAS, not to it.
I've tried both using it as a server and as a client with same result.

When sending a file to it from another computer, scp reports a certain
amount transferred (1.9M) and then immediately stalls. The target file
stays 0-bytes in length.
When trying to "download" a file from another computer, scp reports 0
bytes transferred.

Other download commands (e.g. yum update) work just fine.

arch: x86_64

P.S. The install in question is F12, but since it's 1 day away from
release, I'm asking here.


Try disabling iptables (service iptables stop) and try again.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  su -; find / -name someone -exec touch \{\} \;-
-  - The UNIX way of touching someone-
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Ed Greshko  wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> So, in essence, what you're telling me is that data can come to one's
> computer with no way to get hold of it. I find it pretty amazing.
>
>   
I would say it this way..."no simple/easy way to get hold of it".

For example, in data being streamed (but not stored) on your system it
is possible (but not easy) to capture the IP packets and then
reconstruct the data.  Of course you need to know the protocol being
used and how to reassemble the packets.  Then, even if you do that, the
data may have been compressed so you would have to know what compression
algorithm was used to uncompress it (not so hard).  And the data may
have been encrypted with the receiving application being responsible for
decryption.  So, you need to know how to decrypt (not so easy).

That said, I gave you a start for saving those movie clips.  I also can
tell you the key to saving BBC videos is probably an application called
iplayer or get_iplayer.

And it isn't all that amazing at all.  This has been happening for a
long, long time.  Have you ever used vncviewer, run a remote X session?

And think of the simple case of "sftp u...@somehost".  There you have a
data stream between 2 systems...with no easy way to capture the data
stream and reconstruct it.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Alpine paragraph justification failing

2009-11-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Beartooth wrote:

> 
> 
> Many times, when I hit ^J amid text in compose mode, it merely
> makes a mess; and trying to mitigate that only keeps making it worse.
> 
> This is with Alpine 2.0 under Fedora 11; I haven't yet managed to
> spot a pattern in when it happens.
> 
> I asked on the Alpine list, and was told inter alia that "Alpine
> 2.00 in Fedora 11 has been known to have bugs not related to
> Alpine, but to gcc. You may want to report this to them and see if they
> can duplicate it."

There's been exactly 1 gcc-induced bug in alpine that I'm aware of, which 
was fixed eons ago.  Any remaining complaints, without evidence, is FUD as 
far as I'm concerned.

-- Rex


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/16/2009 05:48 PM, Chris wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!
> 

The torrent is up, too, at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents/

- -- 

  Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksB870ACgkQeERILVgMyvBb3ACdGtnOqzuQ6V38m7vgBrv8UX6o
Z6gAnAqr/MghGetc9CCoOIYgzrzAJOZU
=lcp1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Printer advice apology.

2009-11-16 Thread Aaron Konstam
Well I made a mistake . The line:
smb://domain/server/printer
does indeed cause printing to occur,

I am embarrassed but the truth is my problem was not having samba
installed. Another 10 lashes is required -:)
--
===
"Seed me, Seymour" -- a random number generator meets the big green
mother from outer space
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Changing GRUB

2009-11-16 Thread Linux Newbie
When I turn my system on GRUB displays the message "Press any key to enter 
the menu" then a couple of blank lines and then the default OS and countdown 
timer.  I would like to remove the "Press any key..." and two blank lines 
and display just the default OS and countdown timer.  I looked in the 
grub.conf file and it's not there.  Does anyone know how to remove these 
three lines?


Robt 


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Gnucash -- printing the check memo field

2009-11-16 Thread Sam Varshavchik
I'm trying to get gnucash to print a memo line on printed checks, in 
addition to the payee's name. No matter in which part of a split transaction 
I type in my short blurb, the print preview shows an empty memo line.


If anyone managed to get gnucash to print a memo line, I'd like to know how 
you did it. Googling around comes up empty.




pgpGmqIaulzdB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Upcoming IRC Class tomorrow! (2009-11-17)

2009-11-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:32:02 +1030
Tim  wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:34 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > we currently have the following Classes scheduled: 
> >  
> > 2009-11-17 14:00 Dan Walsh - Secure Virtualization sVirt
> >  
> > Note that this is in the morning in North America, just before the
> > F12 release. (Use 'date -u' to see your current time and date in
> > UTC). 
> 
> This is confusing.  Are you saying that time is a UTC time?

Yes. All Classroom times are in UTC. 

Use 'date -u' to see your current time in UTC. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Was: XBMC for Fedora- now Sending as html in Thunderbird

2009-11-16 Thread David
On 11/16/2009 6:03 PM, Roger wrote:
> P.S. I'm using Thunderbird, and don't know how to suppress the HTML
> formatting. I appologize.
> 
> Its one of those well hidden attributes.
> 
> Go to (the book icon) then highlight and select each
> member in your address book one at a time right click to select
> Properties and look at the bottom of the window for"
> "Prefers the receive messages formatted as" and in the dropdown selector
> select "Plain Text"
> 
> You will need to do this for every addressee on your list, unless
> someone knows of a bulk way of doing it.
> Roger
> 

It is in the 'Account Settings' under the 'Composition & Addressing'
tab. Uncheck   Compose in HTML format. For each account if you have more
than one.

-- 


  David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Michael Hennebry

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Les wrote:


Given that I have seen all kinds of effects in C code, but generally
from compilers that are not "ISO standard" what ever that really means
(ISO is not cast in stone by any means either when it comes to almost
all things).


The standards of interest are written down.
Most things don't change much, if at all, from one verion to another.


But some things have to work for programs to compile and run across
platforms.

The basic copy function which is in most text books:
*a++=*b++;
for example, but I have seen compilers break this bit of code.


Ouch.


The effects run from:
*++a = *b++
*++a = *++b
*a++ = *++b

I have seen some folks attempt to fix it with parens:
*(a++)=*(b++);  but that is probably predictable, but would mean that


Why not (*(++a)) = (*(b++)); ?
Does that not work either?


the pointers would have to be set artificially prior to the call to
point one location earlier, and the exit condition would be pointing
after the last character.



Floats are another source of errors, due to some using hexadecimal
notation, and others using binary and still others some form of excess
twos notation.  Between them round off and truncation errors can occur
at intervals of 38, 72 and 134 if I remember correctly, at least
something like these intervals where the rounding function will produce
one number in one implementation and a different number in another.  I
have had people argue with me about my code being wrong, even after I
would write a test case and show them that the problem wasn't the code,
but rather the choice of compiler and its resultant choice of floating
point implementation.


Quite possibly your code was wrong.
With floating point, deciding such things can be a bit tricky.
C89 doesn't require much of floating point.
if(x/11.0==13.7) { ... } would almost certainly be wrong.
There might be compilers and hardware for which
it would do what you want with your data,
but that wouldn't mean the code wasn't wrong.
if(x< 150.7) { ... } might be good.


It gets more arcane with chained calculations.  Each time you multiply
two numbers together, there is an associated rounding error.  But it is
But how would you categorize all these different effects, provide
examples, show the results in the several cases and also hopefully add
some guidance (such as man pages do) for the combinatorial effects?


With difficulty.
One has to live with the fact that floating point
arithmetic is not real number arithmetic.
One will sometimes have to deal with cases too close to call.
Really good code will detect them.
It's not easy.

--
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Fedora 12

2009-11-16 Thread Chris
Greetings,

I see the ISO is on the NZ mirror!

-- 
Best regards,

Chris

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

"There's no place like 127.0.0.1"

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


SCP works one way only

2009-11-16 Thread Konstantin Svist

For some reason, I can only SCP files off my new NAS, not to it.
I've tried both using it as a server and as a client with same result.

When sending a file to it from another computer, scp reports a certain 
amount transferred (1.9M) and then immediately stalls. The target file 
stays 0-bytes in length.
When trying to "download" a file from another computer, scp reports 0 
bytes transferred.


Other download commands (e.g. yum update) work just fine.

arch: x86_64

P.S. The install in question is F12, but since it's 1 day away from 
release, I'm asking here.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Was: XBMC for Fedora- now Sending as html in Thunderbird

2009-11-16 Thread Roger
P.S. I'm using Thunderbird, and don't know how to suppress the HTML 
formatting. I appologize.


Its one of those well hidden attributes.

Go to (the book icon) then highlight and select each 
member in your address book one at a time right click to select 
Properties and look at the bottom of the window for"
"Prefers the receive messages formatted as" and in the dropdown selector 
select "Plain Text"


You will need to do this for every addressee on your list, unless 
someone knows of a bulk way of doing it.

Roger

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Upcoming IRC Class tomorrow! (2009-11-17)

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:34 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> we currently have the following Classes scheduled: 
>  
> 2009-11-17 14:00 Dan Walsh - Secure Virtualization sVirt
>  
> Note that this is in the morning in North America, just before the F12
> release. (Use 'date -u' to see your current time and date in UTC). 

This is confusing.  Are you saying that time is a UTC time?

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: test

2009-11-16 Thread Roger

On 11/17/2009 04:26 AM, Kevin Abbey wrote:

test message to fedora-list


Received loud and clear
Roger

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Les
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/16/2009 01:06 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > On 11/16/09 13:54, quoth Rick Stevens:
> >> On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
> >>> Steven W. Orr wrote:
> >>>
>  There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages.
>  But perl
>  comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides
>  FSF and
>  the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
>  statement in some other dialect.
> >>>
> >>> As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any
> >>> difference in the
> >>> syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
> >>> operating system.
> >>
> >> Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
> >> of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
> >> other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or
> >> right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the
> >> operands have "side effects"
> >>
> >> Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
> >> necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
> >> datum.
> >>
> >> C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.
> >
> >
> > I think I disagree on this one. We jumped from standardization of keywords 
> > to
> > how operators perform. I quote from page 53 of K&R: Table of Precedence and
> > Associativity of Operators: a + b + c *always* goes from left to right. K&R 
> > is
> > not the standard, but does the standard say otherwise? Lots of things are up
> > to the compiler writer, but I'd be surprised if this was one of them. 
> > Sometime
> > people worry about things like
> >
> > a++ + b++ + c++
> >
> > but even there, the precedence and the associativity are defined. In this 
> > case
> >
> > a++ + b++ + c++
> >
> > becomes (in psuedo stack code):
> >
> > a++
> > b++
> > c++
> > a b +
> > c +
> >
> > because binary + is lower precedence than ++.
> >
> > No?
> 
> I probably should have added "...subject to standard rules of 
> arithmetic".  AFAIK, there's no guarantee to the order that any given
> operand to an arithmetic operator will be evaluated if they're at the
> same level of precedence.  In the examples you give, the binding of "++"
> is higher than addition so that's unambiguous. But if a, b or c are, 
> say, pointers that depend on the values of one of the others, then side
> effects can be dangerous (the classic example of that is "getc(3)").
> 
> What I was trying to get across is, while the library is pretty 
> standardized (with the exceptions usually called out in the man pages),
> there are some things that different compilers will do differently and
> one should take reasonable care to make sure to use order enforcing
> syntax to make things work properly.
> 
> However even that is off the point of this thread.  The C _library_
> is documented, but that's because it is the underpinnings of many of
> the high-level languages used (C, C++, Fortran and most of the others).
> The languages themselves normally aren't.  The perl, python and several
> other groups do create man pages for their languages (which can be
> massive) and that's a nice thing, but IMHO it's somewhat inappropriate.
> If you need to know C, get a book.  Ditto C++ or python or other high-
> level language.  Don't rely on man pages.
> 
> I'm not even sure I like all the stuff you get with "man bash", but you 
> all know that I'm a curmudgeon.  :-)

Given that I have seen all kinds of effects in C code, but generally
from compilers that are not "ISO standard" what ever that really means
(ISO is not cast in stone by any means either when it comes to almost
all things).

But some things have to work for programs to compile and run across
platforms.

The basic copy function which is in most text books:
*a++=*b++;
for example, but I have seen compilers break this bit of code.
The effects run from:
*++a = *b++
*++a = *++b
*a++ = *++b

I have seen some folks attempt to fix it with parens:
*(a++)=*(b++);  but that is probably predictable, but would mean that
the pointers would have to be set artificially prior to the call to
point one location earlier, and the exit condition would be pointing
after the last character.

Some other interesting artifacts I have come across deals with macro
substitution between debug code and release code, where macros may be
substituted for ease of tracing during the debug phase, but the code in
the macro is subtly different from the code in the routine used for
tracing execution.  Works at Debug but not release, or visa versa
depending on the conditions of the two implementations.

In short, I agree with Rick that you need a book, not just on C, but on
the version

Upcoming IRC Class tomorrow! (2009-11-17)

2009-11-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. 

This is a regular posting every monday,
letting people know about the upcoming IRC classroom sessions that are
scheduled. 

From the Classroom page at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Classroom
we currently have the following Classes scheduled: 

2009-11-17 14:00 Dan Walsh - Secure Virtualization sVirt

Note that this is in the morning in North America, just before the F12 release.
(Use 'date -u' to see your current time and date in UTC). 

Please see the above page for more information on signing up to teach a
class, providing feedback to the classroom mailing list or other
general information. 

Hope to see lots of folks there!

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Michael Hennebry

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Steven W. Orr wrote:


On 11/16/09 13:54, quoth Rick Stevens:

On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
Steven W. Orr wrote:


There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages.
But perl
comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides
FSF and
the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
statement in some other dialect.


As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any
difference in the
syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
operating system.


Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or
right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the
operands have "side effects"

Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
datum.

C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.



I think I disagree on this one. We jumped from standardization of keywords to
how operators perform. I quote from page 53 of K&R: Table of Precedence and
Associativity of Operators: a + b + c *always* goes from left to right. K&R is
not the standard, but does the standard say otherwise? Lots of things are up
to the compiler writer, but I'd be surprised if this was one of them. Sometime
people worry about things like

a++ + b++ + c++

but even there, the precedence and the associativity are defined. In this case

a++ + b++ + c++

becomes (in psuedo stack code):

a++
b++
c++
a b +
c +

because binary + is lower precedence than ++.

No?


No.  The value of a++ is the original value of a.
Assuming a++ does not change the stack:
a b +
c +
a++
c++
b++

Also allowed:
c b a
b++
+ 
c++

+
a++

--
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Rick Stevens

On 11/16/2009 01:06 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:

On 11/16/09 13:54, quoth Rick Stevens:

On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
Steven W. Orr wrote:


There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages.
But perl
comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides
FSF and
the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
statement in some other dialect.


As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any
difference in the
syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
operating system.


Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or
right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the
operands have "side effects"

Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
datum.

C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.



I think I disagree on this one. We jumped from standardization of keywords to
how operators perform. I quote from page 53 of K&R: Table of Precedence and
Associativity of Operators: a + b + c *always* goes from left to right. K&R is
not the standard, but does the standard say otherwise? Lots of things are up
to the compiler writer, but I'd be surprised if this was one of them. Sometime
people worry about things like

a++ + b++ + c++

but even there, the precedence and the associativity are defined. In this case

a++ + b++ + c++

becomes (in psuedo stack code):

a++
b++
c++
a b +
c +

because binary + is lower precedence than ++.

No?


I probably should have added "...subject to standard rules of 
arithmetic".  AFAIK, there's no guarantee to the order that any given

operand to an arithmetic operator will be evaluated if they're at the
same level of precedence.  In the examples you give, the binding of "++"
is higher than addition so that's unambiguous. But if a, b or c are, 
say, pointers that depend on the values of one of the others, then side

effects can be dangerous (the classic example of that is "getc(3)").

What I was trying to get across is, while the library is pretty 
standardized (with the exceptions usually called out in the man pages),

there are some things that different compilers will do differently and
one should take reasonable care to make sure to use order enforcing
syntax to make things work properly.

However even that is off the point of this thread.  The C _library_
is documented, but that's because it is the underpinnings of many of
the high-level languages used (C, C++, Fortran and most of the others).
The languages themselves normally aren't.  The perl, python and several
other groups do create man pages for their languages (which can be
massive) and that's a nice thing, but IMHO it's somewhat inappropriate.
If you need to know C, get a book.  Ditto C++ or python or other high-
level language.  Don't rely on man pages.

I'm not even sure I like all the stuff you get with "man bash", but you 
all know that I'm a curmudgeon.  :-)

--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-If your broker is so damned smart...why is he still working?-
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 11/16/2009 04:06 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On 11/16/09 13:54, quoth Rick Stevens:
>> On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
>>> Steven W. Orr wrote:
>>>
 There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages.
 But perl
 comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides
 FSF and
 the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
 statement in some other dialect.
>>>
>>> As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any
>>> difference in the
>>> syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
>>> operating system.
>>
>> Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
>> of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
>> other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or
>> right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the
>> operands have "side effects"
>>
>> Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
>> necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
>> datum.
>>
>> C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.
> 
> 
> I think I disagree on this one. We jumped from standardization of keywords to
> how operators perform. I quote from page 53 of K&R: Table of Precedence and
> Associativity of Operators: a + b + c *always* goes from left to right. K&R is
> not the standard, but does the standard say otherwise? Lots of things are up
> to the compiler writer, but I'd be surprised if this was one of them. Sometime
> people worry about things like
> 
> a++ + b++ + c++
> 
> but even there, the precedence and the associativity are defined. In this case
> 
> a++ + b++ + c++
> 
> becomes (in psuedo stack code):
> 
> a++
> b++
> c++
> a b +
> c +
> 
> because binary + is lower precedence than ++.
> 
> No?

No.  a++ means:  produce the value of a for use in the expression, then
increment a.
 ++a means:  increment the value of a, then use the incremented
value in the expression.

So, a++ + b++ + c++ produces the value (a+b+c), but the variables a, b,
and c get incremented *after* their values get used in the expression.

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@rcn.com
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


[Fwd: Re: Using cups to print from a fedora machine to an XP machine.]

2009-11-16 Thread Aaron Konstam
-I asked the question below: 
> II had printing working from a fedora machine to a Windows XP machine
> but unfortunately the Fedora machine went belly up. And I can't find any
> trace of the cups line using the smb://protocol that supported the
> printing. I have given myself the appropriate 10 lashes but would
> someone help me and tell me what the smb:// line looks like?
>
> I would appreciate it.
I received 2 responses:

1.

smb:

For example:

smb://MAIN/192.168.179.105/Kyoceraprinter

2.
smb://domain/user:pas...@printerurl

Neither worked. Previosly I had a smb:// line that worked.
Are there any other ideas out there. I remember that the previos line requirede 
a user and passwd.
 but it seemed to me that it also needed a printer name.

--
===
Cheese -- milk's leap toward immortality. -- Clifton Fadiman, "Any
Number Can Play"
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Steven W. Orr
On 11/16/09 13:54, quoth Rick Stevens:
> On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
>> Steven W. Orr wrote:
>>
>>> There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages.
>>> But perl
>>> comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides
>>> FSF and
>>> the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
>>> statement in some other dialect.
>>
>> As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any
>> difference in the
>> syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
>> operating system.
> 
> Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
> of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
> other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or
> right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the
> operands have "side effects"
> 
> Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
> necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
> datum.
> 
> C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.


I think I disagree on this one. We jumped from standardization of keywords to
how operators perform. I quote from page 53 of K&R: Table of Precedence and
Associativity of Operators: a + b + c *always* goes from left to right. K&R is
not the standard, but does the standard say otherwise? Lots of things are up
to the compiler writer, but I'd be surprised if this was one of them. Sometime
people worry about things like

a++ + b++ + c++

but even there, the precedence and the associativity are defined. In this case

a++ + b++ + c++

becomes (in psuedo stack code):

a++
b++
c++
a b +
c +

because binary + is lower precedence than ++.

No?

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Michael Hennebry

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Rick Stevens wrote:


On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:


As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any difference in 
the

syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
operating system.


Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in


It does in the example given.
Binary + associates left to right.

other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or right 
to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the

operands have "side effects"


(a+b)*(b+a) could be ambiguous.
Either sum could be performed first.
If their are side effects, order could matter.

Order could also matter if floating point is involved.
C89 doesn't require much of floating point.
It doesn't even require that the same expression with
the same data produce the same number each time.

The following function could return 1:

int fred(float a, float b)
{
int result=0;
for(int j=0; j< 10; ++j) result+=(1f< a*b);
return result;
}

I would hope not.


Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
datum.

C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.


--
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how to start with simple SDL programming?

2009-11-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 22:23:03 +0200,
  Joonas Sarajärvi  wrote:
> 2009/11/16, Hiisi :
> >
> > Not actually response to OP, but I also have some interest in this
> > tread, especially in SDL, OpenGL, glub, etc. programming. What
> > instruments are available for me in Fedora (F 11 currently)?
> >
> 
> Fedora includes the mesa graphics library, which is a free
> implementation of OpenGL. By itself, the OpenGL library doesn't help
> you get an OpenGL rendering context, but there are other libraries
> which are helpful for that. I'm also very new to the OpenGL stuff, but
> I've use SDL to do that. The SDL reference documentation includes
> examples on doing that.

ogre is another library that might be of interest. It is used to do 3d
displays.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Attempt to build kernel under fc11 x86_64 fails

2009-11-16 Thread Reg Clemens
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Reg Clemens  wrote:
> > I have just brought up 64bit fc11, done a 'yum update' to bring it up to
> > date with the current changes, and am trying to build the 2.7.31.6 kernel.
> >
> > This is my first try at a 64bit OS, so I may be doing something stupid.
> >
> > I see a number of compile errors/warnings, but the most significant seem
> > to be near the end of the build of the modules, where I see:
> >
> > ---
> >
  << snip >>
> 
> You've installed the 64-bit version of Fedora 11. So naturally the
> glibc that was installed is also 64-bit.
> 
> Are you trying to compile a 32-bit kernel? Then you need to install
> the 32-bit version of glibc.

Nope, trying to build a 64bit kernel.
> 
> Can you do a "rpm -qa | grep glibc"  and paste the output here?
>
Here is that result:

[...@deneb ~]$ rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-headers-2.10.1-5.x86_64
glibc-common-2.10.1-5.x86_64
glibc-2.10.1-5.x86_64
 
> When you install 32-bit glibc, the file ld-linux.so.2 will be
> installed. Presently it is not.
> 
> Can you do a search for ld-linux.so.2 by using the following command?
> 
> # find / -name ld-linux.so.2
>

[r...@deneb reg]# !!
find / -name ld-linux.so.2 -print
[r...@deneb reg]# 

Nope, not found, looking at my fc10 (32bit) this is a symbolic link pointing
to ld-2.10.so in the same directory.  Looking at /lib, thats not there either.

In a 2nd email, you asked for

> Can you also do a "head -n 15 .config"?
 
Here is that listing.

[r...@deneb linux-2.6.31.6-PPS]# head -n 15 .config
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.31.6-PPS
# Sun Nov 15 18:49:16 2009
#
CONFIG_64BIT=y
# CONFIG_X86_32 is not set
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf64-x86-64"
CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig"
CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y
CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y

---

So, to me it looks like (at least) one rpm did not load, yet the rpm -qa shows 
them
as having loaded.  

I just went back and did a 
sha256sum Fedora-11-X86_64-DVD.iso
and it gave the correct checksum, 
however when I did
sha256sum /dev/cdrom
to check the DVD, it did NOT give the correct checksum.  
Perhaps I should reburn the DVD ?  Or is this not the correct way to check the 
DVD ?

In any case, any thoughts on my problem will be appreciated.

-- 
Reg.Clemens
r...@dwf.com



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how to start with simple SDL programming?

2009-11-16 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
2009/11/16, Hiisi :
>
> Not actually response to OP, but I also have some interest in this
> tread, especially in SDL, OpenGL, glub, etc. programming. What
> instruments are available for me in Fedora (F 11 currently)?
>

Fedora includes the mesa graphics library, which is a free
implementation of OpenGL. By itself, the OpenGL library doesn't help
you get an OpenGL rendering context, but there are other libraries
which are helpful for that. I'm also very new to the OpenGL stuff, but
I've use SDL to do that. The SDL reference documentation includes
examples on doing that.



-- 
Joonas Sarajärvi
mue...@gmail.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how to start with simple SDL programming?

2009-11-16 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
2009/11/16, Robert P. J. Day :
>
>   having never done any SDL programming before (so be gentle), what
> would i need to do to get started in terms of loading framebuffer
> support for my first program?
>
>   currently, on this laptop, i have perfectly serviceable video with:
>
> $ lsmod | grep radeon
> radeon509536  2
> ttm42256  1 radeon
> drm_kms_helper 25456  1 radeon
> drm   172288  5 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
> radeonfb   75128  0
> fb_ddc  2464  1 radeonfb
> i2c_algo_bit6068  2 radeon,radeonfb
> i2c_core   28608  8
> radeon,drm,radeonfb,fb_ddc,i2c_algo_bit,i2c_dev,videodev,i2c_piix4
> $
>
>   i also have a "radeonfb" loadable module which i'm assuming i'm
> going to need.  or am i?  there's certainly enough simple SDL examples
> out there to get started, i just want to make sure i have the
> underlying functionality in place for my first sample program to run.
> thoughts?  or am i going about this the wrong way?

As far as I know, at least the basic SDL graphics stuff should work
just fine anywhere you can expect to get a normal graphical program
running. Basic OpenGL stuff is also doable with just a plain vesa
video driver, but of course it'll be quite slow unless you have
hardware acceleration.

I don't think you need the radeonfb driver for anything SDL related. I
think the SDL framebuffer usually refers to the pixels inside the
window that SDL creates for you.

-- 
Joonas Sarajärvi
mue...@gmail.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Update broken by MythTV

2009-11-16 Thread Marcel Rieux
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/Gray-OSD/osd.xml from install of
mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/isthmus/osd.xml from install of
mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter-wide/watermark/phone.png
from install of mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter/watermark/phone.png from
install of mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter-wide/base.xml from install
of mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter/base.xml from install of
mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch

(...)

file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter-wide/watermark/zoneminder.png
from install of mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch
  file /usr/share/mythtv/themes/MythCenter/watermark/zoneminder.png
from install of mythtv-base-themes-0.22-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package mythtv-themes-0.21-4.noarch

Error Summary

=

I was surprised that no new update came to fix this today.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Tim  wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> he one thing that you are missing is that some media suppliers don't
>> want folks to save the streams.  Folks like psb and bbc develop there
>> own "embedded players" that sit between the flash plugin and source.
>> The communicate on port 1935.  There is no disk cache and the protocol
>> is client-server.
>
> Unfortunately, this is all too common.  I'm not too bothered about
> saving most things on the net.  But I get continually snagged by
> services that are so lagged that I can't watch them (big long wait,
> watch half a second, big long wait, rinse, cycle, repeat).  And the
> sites with completely unsupported schemes, though that's another story.

I had a stream at PBS stutter then stop dead in its tracks 10 minutes
before the end. Sometimes, somewhere else, just changing the screen
size killed the video.

That's a reason why I want to save important videos that I might want
to watch again. The other being that they might someday disappear from
the site.

OTOH, I find The Warning, Inside the Meltdown and Breaking the Bank to
be top of the top class documentaries and I'd like to contribute a few
dollars. But I really don't believe in giving away my credit card
number on the net. I only use my credit card to pay my ISP. I'm old
fashion, I suppose.

Do you people use your credit card on the net?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how to start with simple SDL programming?

2009-11-16 Thread Hiisi
2009/11/16 Robert P. J. Day :
>
>  having never done any SDL programming before (so be gentle), what
> would i need to do to get started in terms of loading framebuffer
> support for my first program?
>
>  currently, on this laptop, i have perfectly serviceable video with:
>
> $ lsmod | grep radeon
> radeon                509536  2
> ttm                    42256  1 radeon
> drm_kms_helper         25456  1 radeon
> drm                   172288  5 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
> radeonfb               75128  0
> fb_ddc                  2464  1 radeonfb
> i2c_algo_bit            6068  2 radeon,radeonfb
> i2c_core               28608  8 
> radeon,drm,radeonfb,fb_ddc,i2c_algo_bit,i2c_dev,videodev,i2c_piix4
> $
>
>  i also have a "radeonfb" loadable module which i'm assuming i'm
> going to need.  or am i?  there's certainly enough simple SDL examples
> out there to get started, i just want to make sure i have the
> underlying functionality in place for my first sample program to run.
> thoughts?  or am i going about this the wrong way?
>
> rday
> --
>
>
> 
> Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
>
>            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
>
> Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
> Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
> 
>

Not actually response to OP, but I also have some interest in this
tread, especially in SDL, OpenGL, glub, etc. programming. What
instruments are available for me in Fedora (F 11 currently)?


-- 
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: http://counter.li.org/
--
Spandex is a privilege, not a right.
--
SIP: hi...@ekiga.net
--
pub   1024D/085B139A
--
Powered by Fedora:
http://fedoraproject.org/

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 12:59 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:54:45 -0800
> Rick Stevens wrote:
> 
> > C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.
> 
> Is the C Standard Library actually standard, then, or are there
> implementation differences there as well?

man -s 3 intro

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines



Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
 wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 01:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Sunday 15 November 2009, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> >On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Ed Greshko  wrote:
>> >> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> >>> It doesn't save a file in /tmp. As a bonus, since it's not political,
>> >>> it's not off topic. Perfect for Linux geeks!
>> >>
>> >> That one was easy
>> >>
>> >> wget
>> >> http://pdl.warnerbros.com/trailers/alphanum/00a/about_schmidt_4x3ff_tlr_4
>> >>80x.flv
>> >
>> >I've been had with this one. Since I found no file in /tmp, I assumed
>> >there would be no URL in the code of the page.
>> >
>> >This one, I believe, would be a better challenge:
>> >
>> >http://video.pbs.org/video/1082087546/
>> >
>> And I don't see a link in /tmp to this one's buffer.  It's playing very well
>> right now.  And lsof|grep firefox isn't spitting out anything that looks like
>> the buffer location either.
>
> Try lsof|grep npviewer

lsof|grep npviewer
npviewer. 2393  user  cwd   DIR8,5 4096
 12 /home/user
npviewer. 2393  user  rtd   DIR8,3 4096  2 /
npviewer. 2393  user  txt   REG8,3   147136
29599 /usr/lib64/nspluginwrapper/npviewer.bin
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,376848
10416 /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6.4.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,334544
11862 /usr/lib64/libXrandr.so.2.2.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,311312
11058 /usr/lib64/libXinerama.so.1.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,342352
11379 /usr/lib64/libXi.so.6.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,312160
12359 /usr/lib64/libXcomposite.so.1.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,326064
29420 /usr/lib64/libXtst.so.6.1.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   302592
29551 /usr/lib64/libpulse.so.0.8.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   935512
29557 /lib64/libasound.so.2.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   370720
29547 /usr/lib64/libpulsecommon-0.9.15.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   188376
11970 /usr/lib64/libvorbis.so.0.4.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,331624
12007 /usr/lib64/libvorbisfile.so.3.2.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,319328
29618 /usr/lib64/libcanberra-gtk.so.0.0.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,365240
12029 /usr/lib64/libcanberra.so.0.1.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   909728
5657 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2000.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   275328
10705 /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2000.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,319696
12380 /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2000.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,314312
10708 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2000.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   491472
12361 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0.2000.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   126192
12376 /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0.1600.6
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   301920
10714 /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0.2400.5
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   128592
14711 /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0.2511.1
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   137960
16620 /usr/lib64/libdbus-glib-1.so.2.1.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   255600
5256 /usr/lib64/libibus.so.1.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,394488
5949 /usr/lib64/libgvfscommon.so.0.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   153936
11223 /lib64/ld-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3  1825624
13734 /lib64/libc-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   615312
15601 /lib64/libm-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,323208
15600 /lib64/libdl-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   148528
14715 /lib64/libpthread-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,388368
14047 /lib64/libz.so.1.2.3
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   120464
18643 /lib64/libselinux.so.1
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,349352
14854 /lib64/librt-2.10.1.so
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   112456
87137 /usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1.1.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3  1284536
94509 /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6.2.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,312384
87136 /usr/lib64/libXau.so.6.0.0
npviewer. 2393  user  mem   REG8,3   628360
79525 /usr/lib64/libfreetype.s

Re: XBMC for Fedora

2009-11-16 Thread Konstantin Svist

On 11/16/2009 11:01 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Anyhow, given the fact that there isn't an XBMC RPM in one of the 
mentioned repositories, I built it myself based on an RPM by Scott 
Harvanek. It's here: http://rolffokkens.dyndns.org/




I have been running XMBC on F10 for a while now. At first, I used some 
fixes & workarounds from some wiki page (not sure where it is anymore), 
but later on it compiled reasonably well straight from their SVN tree.
There's a readme which tells you which packages are necessary and config 
script tells you about some missing packages as well. Their main target 
is ubuntu, but the packages are usually similarly named.



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Ed Greshko  wrote:

(...)

So, in essence, what you're telling me is that data can come to one's
computer with no way to get hold of it. I find it pretty amazing.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XBMC for Fedora

2009-11-16 Thread Konstantin Svist

On 11/16/2009 11:01 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Anyhow, given the fact that there isn't an XBMC RPM in one of the 
mentioned repositories, I built it myself based on an RPM by Scott 
Harvanek. It's here: http://rolffokkens.dyndns.org/


I have been running XMBC on F10 for a while now. At first, I used some 
fixes & workarounds from some wiki page (not sure where it is anymore), 
but later on it compiled reasonably well straight from their SVN tree.
They have a readme which tells you which packages are necessary and 
config script tells you about some missing packages as well. Their main 
target is ubuntu, but the packages are usually similarly named.


It's running very stable on mij x86_64 Fedora 11 system, both music 
and video's run smoothly. Somehow however I can't play physical media 
like DVD's and CD's, as XBMC doesn't seem te be aware of them. Could 
be a libcdio-0.18 related problem.


I would recompile a version from SVN. It's not as bad as it sounds ;)


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: missing CPUs -- kernel-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64

2009-11-16 Thread Steven P. Ulrick
> Hi,
> 
> I just updated to the latest kernel in the updates of Fedora 11 and the
> system is no longer using the 2 quad-core chips
> The system is no longer seen as an SMP system using
> kernel-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64
> 
> 
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys ns
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys memory
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys devices
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys net_cls
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D
> cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU 0/0x0 -> Node 0
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: using C1E aware idle routine
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Freeing SMP alternatives: 31k freed
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ACPI: Core revision 20090320
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ACPI: setting ELCR to 0200 (from 8ca0)
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ftrace: converting mcount calls to 0f 1f
> 44 00 00
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ftrace: allocating 19364 entries in 76 pages
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Failed to register trace ftrace module
> notifier
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Setting APIC routing to flat
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: weird, boot CPU (#0) not listed by the BIOS.
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP motherboard not detected.
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Setting APIC routing to flat
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP disabled
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Brought up 1 CPUs
> Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Total of 1 processors activated (4423.16
> BogoMIPS).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On the same system the older kernel works fine:
> 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64
> 
> On identical hardware but different server also running Fedora 11;
> this kernel works fine:  2.6.30.9-90.fc11.x86_64
> 
> 
> Is  this broken?:  2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64

Hello Kevin
I appear to be running the same kernel (2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64)  My processor 
is a single Intel Xeon 2.0Ghz QuadCore.  The following seems to show that this 
kernel is not causing me the same grief that it is causing you:

[r...@localhost log]# grep -i processor messages
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: Detected 1995.181 MHz processor.
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: Booting processor 1 APIC 0x2 ip 0x6000
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: Booting processor 2 APIC 0x4 ip 0x6000
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 2
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: Booting processor 3 APIC 0x6 ip 0x6000
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 3
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: Total of 4 processors activated (15956.88 
BogoMIPS).
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: processor ACPI_CPU:00: registered as 
cooling_device0
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: processor ACPI_CPU:01: registered as 
cooling_device1
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: processor ACPI_CPU:02: registered as 
cooling_device2
Nov 15 19:31:49 localhost kernel: processor ACPI_CPU:03: registered as 
cooling_device3
[r...@localhost log]#

Steven P. Ulrick

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XBMC for Fedora

2009-11-16 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/17/2009 12:31 AM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Several people have contributed to this subject in the past: XBMC for
> fedora. So far however XBMC isn't available in rpmfusion or fedora
> repositories. Is there a specific reason (like licensing) for this?

Nobody volunteered yet.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


XBMC for Fedora

2009-11-16 Thread Rolf Fokkens

Hi!

Several people have contributed to this subject in the past: XBMC for 
fedora. So far however XBMC isn't available in rpmfusion or fedora 
repositories. Is there a specific reason (like licensing) for this?


Anyhow, given the fact that there isn't an XBMC RPM in one of the 
mentioned repositories, I built it myself based on an RPM by Scott 
Harvanek. It's here: http://rolffokkens.dyndns.org/


It's running very stable on mij x86_64 Fedora 11 system, both music and 
video's run smoothly. Somehow however I can't play physical media like 
DVD's and CD's, as XBMC doesn't seem te be aware of them. Could be a 
libcdio-0.18 related problem.


Cheers!

Rolf

P.S. I'm using Thunderbird, and don't know how to suppress the HTML 
formatting. I appologize.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:54:45 -0800
Rick Stevens wrote:

> C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.

Is the C Standard Library actually standard, then, or are there
implementation differences there as well?

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: man 3 switch

2009-11-16 Thread Rick Stevens

On 11/14/2009 01:55 PM, Frank Cox wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:50:57 -0500
Steven W. Orr wrote:


There's nothing wrong with perl having all kinds of perldoc pages. But perl
comes from one place. C, OTOH could come from lots of places besides FSF and
the switch statement in gcc may not be exactly the same as the switch
statement in some other dialect.


As C is an ISO standard, I sincerely doubt there would be any difference in the
syntax and behaviour of the keywords between C compilers on any Unix-like
operating system.


Incorrect.  C, for example, does not guarantee the order of evaluation
of arithmetic operators of equal precedence in the same statement (in
other words, is something like "a + b + c" evaluated left to right, or 
right to left?).  This can have significant effects if some of the

operands have "side effects"

Another example is that a null pointer (or the value "NUL") is not
necessarily zero, only that it is guaranteed to not point at any valid
datum.

C allows quite a bit of leeway to the compiler implementation.




Let's talk about foreskins instead.


Is there something wrong with you?


(Wait, did I just start ranting?)


I can't tell you what you're thinking, if you actually are.  Why do you
believe it's appropriate to make idiotic remarks like that in the middle of a
serious discussion on a technical mailing list?  Are you really that immature?




--
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   Vegetarian:  Old Indian word for "lousy hunter"  -
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


missing CPUs -- kernel-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64

2009-11-16 Thread Kevin Abbey

Hi,

I just updated to the latest kernel in the updates of Fedora 11 and the
system is no longer using the 2 quad-core chips
The system is no longer seen as an SMP system using
kernel-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64


Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys ns
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys memory
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys devices
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys freezer
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys net_cls
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D
cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU 0/0x0 -> Node 0
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: using C1E aware idle routine
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Freeing SMP alternatives: 31k freed
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ACPI: Core revision 20090320
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ACPI: setting ELCR to 0200 (from 8ca0)
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ftrace: converting mcount calls to 0f 1f
44 00 00
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: ftrace: allocating 19364 entries in 76 pages
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Failed to register trace ftrace module
notifier
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Setting APIC routing to flat
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: weird, boot CPU (#0) not listed by the BIOS.
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP motherboard not detected.
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Setting APIC routing to flat
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: SMP disabled
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Brought up 1 CPUs
Nov 16 11:27:41 nikka kernel: Total of 1 processors activated (4423.16
BogoMIPS).





On the same system the older kernel works fine:
2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.x86_64

On identical hardware but different server also running Fedora 11;
this kernel works fine:  2.6.30.9-90.fc11.x86_64


Is  this broken?:  2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64


Thank you,
Kevin

--
Kevin C. Abbey
System Administrator
Rutgers University - BioMaPS Institute



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


test

2009-11-16 Thread Kevin Abbey

test message to fedora-list

--
Kevin C. Abbey
System Administrator
Rutgers University - BioMaPS Institute

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Plugging into Projectors

2009-11-16 Thread Charlie McVeigh
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:29 -0500, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>   I am running F11 on a Dell Latitude D820. I am unable to connect to
> projectors except at ridiculously small screen resolutions. Running
> Windows on the same machine plugs into projectors easily. What can I
> do?
> 
>  Take care
>  Oliver
> 


While a pain to do, I have always had good luck getting the full
capabilities of the projector recognized when I do a cold boot of my
Fedora laptop with the projector connected and powered up.

Charlie

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Daniel J Walsh
On 11/16/2009 12:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> I just upgraded two of my systems to latest yum update
> (2.6.30.9-96.fc11.i686.PAE) with the hopes that the CD and DVD issues
> have been resolved (they have, almost, but thats a separate bugzilla
> report).
> 
> What I am querying about in this email is a message that I am seeing
> when I log in as root (yes, I know the caveats and try to respect, but I
> always make sure the ability is there if I need it). I log in from the
> start page GUI and there are no problems until, after a couple of
> seconds later, a pop-up from the "star icon in the upper right" says I
> got problems. I open it up and it says:
> 
> "SELinux is preventing the gdm-session-wor from using potentially
> mislabeled files (/root)."
> 
> Okay, that's nice to know, but I have no idea what it is trying to tell
> me needs to be fixed. I've got a couple files in the home directory but
> nothing looks funny about them (*.txt cut-and-paste of yum
> update/installs and an html of "how-to-install f11 from scratch").
> 
> I have edited both /etc/pam.d/gdm and /etc/pam.d/gdm-password per Fedora
> website instructions to allow root access.
> 
> Closer inspection says that I first began getting this message on
> 20jun09 after a yum update (I did original f11 install at the beginning
> of June). I just hadn't noticed it since I don't often log in as root,
> though I do remember seeing something in the summer and figuring it was
> a glip that would get fixed in future updates).
> 
> Any suggestions as to what I should be looking for to get rid of this
> message ... if I do indeed actually need to pay attention to it. If
> there is more info I can provide, please let me know what it is and how
> to get it and I will gladly post such.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Paul
> 
> 
Paul SELinux policy can not be written in such a way to allow you to run X 
Windows as root.

The problem is too many Applications require rights to write to the homedir and 
we want to treat /root differently then /home.
Allow an confined application to write to /root would allow it to do evil stuff 
by replacing /root/.bashrc for example.

And the next time an admin logged in the script would run.  

If you require running X as root then you will need to put SELinux into 
permissive mode.  In F12 we are now preventing users from logging in as root 
from GDM because it is so dangerous from a security point of view.

Imagine running firefox as root and what problems it can cause.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Warning about possible display issues with F12 upgrade.

2009-11-16 Thread Linuxguy123
Just a heads up that I know of at least 2 F12 show stoppers (as far as
upgrading goes) wherein the computer screen doesn't display the session
properly.  

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529128

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528188


Both of these cases involve NON proprietary display drivers.

If you Google a bit you might find other cases that involve non
proprietary and proprietary drivers.

Long explanation short, I would run F12 live before I did a blind
upgrade to make sure that the video display is going to operate properly
once you do upgrade.

Hope this helps someone.  

 

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: help

2009-11-16 Thread Tait Clarridge
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 10:16 -0800, Ralph Gorrill wrote:
> I yhave a DELL lap top that one of my employess loaded FEDORA on with out 
> telling anyone...I need to remove it...he is gone and I have no 
> password...can anyone help me please.
> 

Is the plan to put windows back on it? You should be able to pop in a
Windows CD/DVD, delete the old partitions in the installer and put
windows back...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread David
On 11/16/2009 12:56 AM, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Paul Allen Newell  wrote:
>> Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
>>
>> My thanks for the prompt reply. I am not certain why I would want to disable
>> SELinux as it clearly is part of the Fedora package and is trying to tell me
>> that something isn't right.
>>
>> Yes, I know I should not start X server or login as root ... and that is not
>> my normal work habit. But I would expect that I should still be able to do
>> such and not have SELinux bark unless there was something wrong. It is the
>> "what is wrong" that I am trying to understand and correct.
>>
>> Paul

> 
> Well, for home or personal use systems, you don't really need SELinux.
> SELinux is for mission critical servers.
> 
> Or unless you work for defense or intelligence agencies, then your
> laptop needs to be secured with SELinux and high grade encryption.


Hmm...

Build a house. Add locks to all the doors and windows so that the
contents of the house can be kept secure. Then disable the locks and
leave the doors and windows wide open.

Makes *perfect* sense.  :-)


-- 


  David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: installing Fedora 11 on dual-boot machine changes active partition?

2009-11-16 Thread Andre Robatino
On 08/16/2009 05:00 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> My father has a dual-boot Vista/Fedora 11 machine, with Grub on the MBR.
>  He recently enabled recommended updates in Vista, and it wanted him to
> install SP2, but he was unable to.  At Stage 3, after rebooting, it got
> to 100% but then failed and reverted the changes.  The associated error
> number was 80004005.  We found that the source of the problem was that
> the active partition was the Fedora /boot partition, not the Windows
> one.  By using Vista's Disk Management tool to make the Vista partition
> active again, the problem was solved.  Grub doesn't seem to care which
> partition is active (at least if it's on the MBR).  Looking at old saved
> fdisk output from 2 of my machines, I suspect that F11 changed the
> active partition, and that in F10 and earlier, the Windows partition was
> active.  Is this new behavior in the F11 installer (to change the active
> partition, even though Grub doesn't care), and if so, is it deliberate?

Sorry for the very late followup, but after clean installing F12, I see
that the F12 installer has again switched the active partition from the
Windows partition (/dev/sda1) back to the Linux /boot partition
(/dev/sda2).  I'll have to switch it back again to avoid future problems
with Windows updates.

[r...@compaq-pc ~]# man fdisk
Formatting page, please wait...
[r...@compaq-pc ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x031a25b1

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   1   10444838860807  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda2   *   10444   10469  204800   83  Linux
/dev/sda3   10469   30401   160103424   8e  Linux LVM
[r...@compaq-pc ~]#




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 13:56:15 +0800,
  "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)"  wrote:
> 
> Well, for home or personal use systems, you don't really need SELinux.
> SELinux is for mission critical servers.

MAC is very useful for home users that run programs that process data
from untrusted sources. This includes web browsers and mail readers.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Auto CAD drawings

2009-11-16 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:22:54 +0100
Antonio M  wrote:

> 2009/11/16 Alan Cox :
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:58:23 +0530
> > RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA  wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any software available for fedora to open Auto CAD drawings?
> >
> > For DXF you can usually open them in qcad and in inkscape.
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
> >
> Alan
> 
> Autocad's user loves dwg format ;-)

Most of the people I know who deal with autocad file submissions from the
outside actually prefer not to accept DWG files because they never quite
feel confident that what appears the other end will match what was saved.

Mind you with DXF having a 600 dpi tiff of the drawing as a check
reference is a good idea as well. I've had funnies between qcad and
autocad where things like linesizes changed mysteriously or extra bits
appeared.

Alan

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Auto CAD drawings

2009-11-16 Thread Antonio M
2009/11/16 Alan Cox :
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:58:23 +0530
> RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA  wrote:
>
>> Is there any software available for fedora to open Auto CAD drawings?
>
> For DXF you can usually open them in qcad and in inkscape.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
Alan

Autocad's user loves dwg format ;-)


-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag
SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 16:14 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>   
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> 
>>> I did this on my CentOS 5 system since rtmpdump didn't compile under
>>> Fedora 11 and I didn't want to debug that.  And I then played it using
>>> mplayer.
>>>
>>>   
>>>   
>> Yes, I am a dummy  I found the rpm for rtmpdump for f11
>> 
>
> Where? I don't see it for F12. I also note that the author seems to have
> received a DMCA takedown notice, instigated by Adobe.
>
>   
rpmfind rtmpdump

But, it is not the latest version.  It is 1.3 v.s. 1.6

-- 
Obstacles are what you see when you take your eyes off your goal. Guess
Who! http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 20:45 +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > he one thing that you are missing is that some media suppliers don't
> > want folks to save the streams.  Folks like psb and bbc develop there
> > own "embedded players" that sit between the flash plugin and source. 
> > The communicate on port 1935.  There is no disk cache and the protocol
> > is client-server.
> 
> Unfortunately, this is all too common.  I'm not too bothered about
> saving most things on the net.  But I get continually snagged by
> services that are so lagged that I can't watch them (big long wait,
> watch half a second, big long wait, rinse, cycle, repeat).  And the
> sites with completely unsupported schemes, though that's another story.

Agreed. Some sites don't even support pausing the stream (i.e. the
stream player pauses but doesn't keep downloading, thus becoming
unwatchable on flaky networks as you say). Some NY Times streams seem to
be like this, though not most of them.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


how to start with simple SDL programming?

2009-11-16 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  having never done any SDL programming before (so be gentle), what
would i need to do to get started in terms of loading framebuffer
support for my first program?

  currently, on this laptop, i have perfectly serviceable video with:

$ lsmod | grep radeon
radeon509536  2
ttm42256  1 radeon
drm_kms_helper 25456  1 radeon
drm   172288  5 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
radeonfb   75128  0
fb_ddc  2464  1 radeonfb
i2c_algo_bit6068  2 radeon,radeonfb
i2c_core   28608  8 
radeon,drm,radeonfb,fb_ddc,i2c_algo_bit,i2c_dev,videodev,i2c_piix4
$

  i also have a "radeonfb" loadable module which i'm assuming i'm
going to need.  or am i?  there's certainly enough simple SDL examples
out there to get started, i just want to make sure i have the
underlying functionality in place for my first sample program to run.
thoughts?  or am i going about this the wrong way?

rday
--



Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 16:14 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> > I did this on my CentOS 5 system since rtmpdump didn't compile under
> > Fedora 11 and I didn't want to debug that.  And I then played it using
> > mplayer.
> >
> >   
> Yes, I am a dummy  I found the rpm for rtmpdump for f11

Where? I don't see it for F12. I also note that the author seems to have
received a DMCA takedown notice, instigated by Adobe.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 01:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 15 November 2009, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Ed Greshko  wrote:
> >> Marcel Rieux wrote:
> >>> It doesn't save a file in /tmp. As a bonus, since it's not political,
> >>> it's not off topic. Perfect for Linux geeks!
> >>
> >> That one was easy
> >>
> >> wget
> >> http://pdl.warnerbros.com/trailers/alphanum/00a/about_schmidt_4x3ff_tlr_4
> >>80x.flv
> >
> >I've been had with this one. Since I found no file in /tmp, I assumed
> >there would be no URL in the code of the page.
> >
> >This one, I believe, would be a better challenge:
> >
> >http://video.pbs.org/video/1082087546/
> >
> And I don't see a link in /tmp to this one's buffer.  It's playing very well 
> right now.  And lsof|grep firefox isn't spitting out anything that looks like 
> the buffer location either.

Try lsof|grep npviewer

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Auto CAD drawings

2009-11-16 Thread Dennis Mattingly
>Is there any software available for fedora to open Auto CAD drawings?
>
>Thank you.

I've heard about using WINE software and AutoCAD 2008.
Also, I believe AutoCAD 2002 has ran on Linux before fairly well.
http://winehq.org

I'm no expert on the Linux side, but I keep an open ear since I work
as an AutoCAD developer on Windows.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Using cups to print from a fedora machine to an XP machine.

2009-11-16 Thread steven bellens
2009/11/16 Aaron Konstam 

> II had printing working from a fedora machine to a Windows XP machine
> but unfortunately the Fedora machine went belly up. And I can't find any
> trace of the cups line using the smb://protocol that supported the
> printing. I have given myself the appropriate 10 lashes but would
> someone help me and tell me what the smb:// line looks like?
>

Something like this:

smb://domain/user:pas...@printerurl

Steven


>
> I would appreciate it.
> --
> ===
> You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.
> ===
> Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Fedora server consuming all memory and grinding to a halt

2009-11-16 Thread paul van der meij
2009/11/16 Tom Horsley 

> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:53:27 +1100
> Langdon Stevenson wrote:
>
> > Given these servers' perfect record in the past I am wondering if anyone
> > can suggest what might be going on?  Or how best to try to track down
> > the reason.
>
> I had a similar problem once and put a cron job in to run every
> few minutes and log the output of a ps command to a file with
> an output format that showed PID, VM size, and process start time.
>
> Then I whipped out a perl script to analyze the logs, find PIDs
> that were running a long time, and kept using more memory the
> longer they run.
>
> Of course, that just found what was leaking, it didn't find out
> why it was leaking :-).
>
> (And no, I don't think I have any of the scripts around anymore :-).
>
> --
>
I had a similar problem once, years ago, with a version of redhat linux when
the memory was faster used up than it was free'd by the paging daemon. I
managed to solve the problem by tweaking some kernel parameter's that
influenced the behavior of the virtual memory system. But I think that now
everything has improved with the current fedora versions, so this problem
has disappeared.

cheers
paul
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 16 November 2009 06:27:27 Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> From Wikipedia:
> 
> “...given the threat models and capabilities of the adversaries
> involved, that's probably appropriate... But that’s not necessarily
> appropriate for all users. SELINUX is so horrible to use, that after
> wasting a large amount of time enabling it and then watching all of my
> applications die a horrible death since they didn't have the
> appropriate hand-crafted security policy, caused me to swear off of
> it. For me, given my threat model and how much my time is worth, life
> is too short for SELinux.” — Theodore Ts’o

This is utter bullshit. I wonder why nobody edited this out of Wikipedia by 
now...

Yes, in the early days SELinux was rough around the edges here and there, but 
not today. And yes, SELinux does have a learning curve, but by now there are 
plenty of nice GUI tools that help people deal with it without actually having 
to learn the internals, changing the policy manually, etc.

This is FUD, please stop spreading it.

Best, :-)
Marko


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 16 November 2009 05:47:43 Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I am not certain why I would want to
> disable SELinux as it clearly is part of the Fedora package and is
> trying to tell me that something isn't right.

Good thinking. You definitely do not want to disable SELinux. It is there for 
a good reason, even if one doesn't know the details of what that reason is.
 
> Yes, I know I should not start X server or login as root ... 

So why did you do it then? Disabled root GUI is also the default for a reason, 
just as SELinux. They are multiple protective layers that try to secure your 
system from any malicious activity, including your own.

> and that is
> not my normal work habit. But I would expect that I should still be able
> to do such and not have SELinux bark unless there was something wrong.
> It is the "what is wrong" that I am trying to understand and correct.

What is wrong (technically) is you moving files across directories without 
changing their SELinux context appropriately. At least that appears so based 
on the info you provided.

However...

What is wrong (essentially) is precisely logging in as root in a GUI. This is 
disabled by default in Fedora, and SELinux policy assumes you run the default 
configuration. Once you enabled root GUI and started poking around in it, it 
was just a matter of time before SELinux starts yelling at you doing this or 
that wrong. I cannot tell exactly what SELinux is complaining about until you 
provide some setroubleshoot info, but it is definitely because you logged in a 
GUI as root, played around with things and then did something SELinux doesn't 
like. And it will keep happening over and over unless you stop using root GUI.

If you are more familiar with Windows world, this would be like logging in 
with admin privileges, disabling antivirus software and automatic updates, and 
then asking "why does the system keep alerting me that security might be 
compromised?". Well, you compromised it.

So much for understanding.

As for correcting the error, I can advise the following:

1) Find all files that you have been mv-ing as root, and move them back to 
their original location.
2) Stop using root GUI.
3) Learn that mv keeps SELinux labels in contrast to cp which changes them 
appropriately. Understand that this is intentional feature of mv and cp. The 
file and directory labels are displayed by "ll -Z".
4) Whenever you need root access use "su -" to log in as root, or learn to 
configure and use sudo. Use only your normal user account for GUI.
5) For regular system administration you don't even need to use su and sudo, 
because the system should ask you for the root password whenever you start a 
GUI app that needs elevated privileges.
6) If SELinux keeps complaining more, learn how to use setroubleshoot utility 
and post the output here on the list. People will help you correct it all, but 
only after you make sure not to produce any more problems by using root GUI.

HTH.

Best, :-)
Marko

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 16 November 2009 05:22:34 Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> You can try to disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config or in
> /boot/grub/grub.conf.
> 
[snip]
> 
> You shouldn't start X server or login to GNOME as root.

Logging as root in X is certainly a bad idea, mainly for security reasons. 
Disabling SELinux is an equally bad idea, also for those same security 
reasons. Why do you advise for one and against the other? It looks 
inconsistent to me.

The fact that OP broke one rule and logged in a GUI as root made the other 
protection layer yell at him about that. And when he asks what is going on, 
your advice is to shut down that other layer. But given that the OP is 
apparently a newbie and is not aware of good security practices, this is quite 
a Bad Idea, since it opens a door for him to break his system even more.

My advice would be to keep SELinux on, and refrain from using X as root. That 
provides good system security (both from others and yourself). 

Best, :-)
Marko


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Cannot install VMware-server-1.0.10

2009-11-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Kevin J. Cummings
 wrote:
>> I am trying to install
>>
>> #rpm -qa VMware-server
>> VMware-server-1.0.10-203137.i386
>>
>> but when running the command
>>
>> vmware-config.pl
>>
>> I get the errors below.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> vmware-server is only "supported" for RHEL and the like.  Fedora is too
> bleeding edge for them, so their kernel compatibility is behind.
>
> You will have to rely on finding the appropriate patches, and applying
> them so that vmware-config.pl builds on your kernel.
>
> I recently updated to VMware-server-2.0.2-203138.x86_64 (had been
> running 2.0.1) and I had to find a new set of patches to get running
> again on F11.  I found them, and a script to apply them (nice!).
> While it still leaves me with compilation warnings, it *does* compile
> and run for me on kernel-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64.

Thanks, Kevin. I have just installed VirtualBox and it works fine and
fast. So, I do not need VMware Server anymore.

Paul

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht

Tim  writes:
> I can't say that I've had mammoth problems with SELinux.  I've had
> occasional glitches, but then the errant program usually gets *fixed* up
> quite promptly, so it stops trying to do things that it shouldn't be
> doing.

I've been running selinux on f12(beta+) and things look pretty good.
The default yum-installed policy is starting to shape up nicely, with
virtually no more noise in my /var/log/messages and
/var/log/audit/audit.log files.  (I only see one daily gripe for
asterisk, but that should be cleaned up in the next policy version.)

-wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
If the airwaves belong to the public why does the public only get 3
non-overlapping WIFI channels?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: trying to understand SELinux message

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 13:56 +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> Well, for home or personal use systems, you don't really need SELinux.
> SELinux is for mission critical servers.

Until you do something that SELinux would have protected you from...

People do actually do things that need securing, on home computers (do
their banking, etc.).  Just browsing the internet and reading your mail
are the two major points of breakdown on the Windows world, and I'd like
it if that problem doesn't migrate over to Linux, as well.

I can't say that I've had mammoth problems with SELinux.  I've had
occasional glitches, but then the errant program usually gets *fixed* up
quite promptly, so it stops trying to do things that it shouldn't be
doing.  Using very strict SELinux rules on test machines, ones that test
packages before release, could only be a good thing for everybody else.

Of course there are some people who insist that there should be no
restrictions, and that any file should be readable by any person, and
any program able to do whatever it wants.  I tend to think of those
people as clueless, or suspect that they are trying to advocate
something that aids them in hacking other people's computers.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> he one thing that you are missing is that some media suppliers don't
> want folks to save the streams.  Folks like psb and bbc develop there
> own "embedded players" that sit between the flash plugin and source. 
> The communicate on port 1935.  There is no disk cache and the protocol
> is client-server.

Unfortunately, this is all too common.  I'm not too bothered about
saving most things on the net.  But I get continually snagged by
services that are so lagged that I can't watch them (big long wait,
watch half a second, big long wait, rinse, cycle, repeat).  And the
sites with completely unsupported schemes, though that's another story.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: help (What I really wanted to say....)

2009-11-16 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 08:11 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> For many people on this list it's really impossible to remove Fedora
> from their computers (including myself).

Yes, I would find it impossible to remove from my computers, too.  I
just couldn't put up with the alternatives.  ;-)




Though, to give a serious answer to the original poster.  I'm sure that
if they researched re-installing Windows, they'd find the answer that
they want.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Auto CAD drawings

2009-11-16 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:58:23 +0530
RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA  wrote:

> Is there any software available for fedora to open Auto CAD drawings?

For DXF you can usually open them in qcad and in inkscape.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Auto CAD drawings

2009-11-16 Thread Roger

On 11/16/2009 06:28 PM, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:

Is there any software available for fedora to open Auto CAD drawings?

Thank you.

Kishore

   

For 3D have a look at Blender 2.49 it reads dxf and other formats
Roger

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> I did this on my CentOS 5 system since rtmpdump didn't compile under
> Fedora 11 and I didn't want to debug that.  And I then played it using
> mplayer.
>
>   
Yes, I am a dummy  I found the rpm for rtmpdump for f11



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Saving Flash

2009-11-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Marcel Rieux wrote:
>   
>> I've been had with this one. Since I found no file in /tmp, I assumed
>> there would be no URL in the code of the page.
>>
>> This one, I believe, would be a better challenge:
>>
>> http://video.pbs.org/video/1082087546/
>>
>>   
>> 
>
> For these types of sites I've heard that you can try something like
> "rtmpdump".  
>
>
>   
FYI, I just now successfully downloaded the entire Bill Cosby piece with

./rtmpdump_x86 -r
"rtmp://203.77.184.132/a1863/o6/tp-live/PBS_CP_General_Audience/cosby-full-revised-CHN.mp4"
-o outfile.mp4

I did this on my CentOS 5 system since rtmpdump didn't compile under
Fedora 11 and I didn't want to debug that.  And I then played it using
mplayer.

All of this I learned by using Google..




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines