udev in f9 is about 100 times slower then in f8
hi, my home directory is a luks encrypted volume. the key for this volume is on my pendrive. before i'd like to login i just plugin my pendrive and then: - udev recognize my pendrive - mount one of the partition on it (which hold the keyfile) - use the keyfile on the mounted partition and open the luks partirion - mount the device mapper as my home - umount my pendrive this was works perfectly on fedora 8 and takes about 2-4sec to my home dir be mounted. now on fedora 9 it's still works, but it takes about 3-4 minutes (!!!) to finish. when i look into what happened: - udev recognize my pendrive - mount one of the partition on it (which hold the keyfile) - use the keyfile on the mounted partition and open the luks partirion and here waits for minutes in this place what is see in ps axf: 522 ?S 2536 ?S< 0:00 \_ /bin/bash /root/bin/home-up /dev/System/lfarkas 2553 ?S< 0:00 \_ /bin/bash /root/bin/luks-up /dev/System/lfarkas 2569 ?Shttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Alan Cox wrote: "all of my system has a wrong openssl version" all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly wrong. I've seen preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's the main reason I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet. The case of yum being 'partially' upgraded came from us having a newer yum in f10+updates than was in F11. This was documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#Yum_doesn.27t_work_after_upgrading_from_F10 and the fix provided for it works to get you to update properly. now, since farkas just mentioned that he didn't actually run preupgrade when things went badly then it suggests to me that preupgrade is probably not to blame. the question here why yum not upgrade openssl during the dvd update process. it's another yum problem (and it's happened with 3 of my systems). -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
kdetv no longer works in f10
hi, in f10 kdetv no longer works with my Avermedia AVerTV GO 007 FM tunner card. it was working properly in f9 with this /etc/modprobe.conf - options snd cards_limit=8 alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel options snd-card-0 index=0 options snd-hda-intel index=0 alias snd-card-1 saa7134-alsa options saa7134 card=57 tuner=54 alsa=1 install saa7134 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install saa7134; /sbin/modprobe saa7134-alsa options saa7134-alsa index=1 -- is there any tip? mplayer tv://1 -tv device=/dev/video1 still working:-( this is the filtered dmesg part: -- saa7130/34: v4l2 driver version 0.2.14 loaded saa7134 :07:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 saa7133[0]: found at :07:02.0, rev: 209, irq: 18, latency: 32, mmio: 0xe3004800 saa7133[0]: subsystem: 1461:f31d, board: Avermedia AVerTV GO 007 FM [card=57,insmod option] saa7133[0]: board init: gpio is 80648 input: saa7134 IR (Avermedia AVerTV GO as /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:07:02.0/input/input8 saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 00: 61 14 1d f3 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 20: ff d2 fe ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 40: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 60: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 70: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom 90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom a0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom b0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom c0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom d0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff saa7133[0]: i2c eeprom f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff tuner' 1-004b: chip found @ 0x96 (saa7133[0]) tda829x 1-004b: setting tuner address to 61 tda829x 1-004b: type set to tda8290+75a saa7133[0]: registered device video1 [v4l2] saa7133[0]: registered device vbi0 saa7133[0]: registered device radio0 saa7134 ALSA driver for DMA sound loaded saa7133[0]/alsa: saa7133[0] at 0xe3004800 irq 18 registered as card 1 -- -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
fedora 11 worst then ever release
hi, first of all i use linux since '94 so i've seen a few releases. and learned to wait a few weeks before upgrade. now i try to upgrade from a few fully update f10 to f11. it's a nightmare! on a 5 years old hardware with raid1 system and boot partition anaconda crash with dmraid error while i don't use dmraid just mdraid:-( and since preupgrade also crash with the same error there is no way to properly upgrade from the latest release to the next release! not even with nodmraid kernel option. on system where anaconda do not crash f10 update's yum newer then on f11 iso's so the installer do not upgrade yum! so after the upgrade yum no longer works. as the installer do not upgrade kernel-devel akmods not able to rebuild kernel module for nvidia and ati so X not able to start. in order to be able to get the latest kernel-devel and akmods packages i need network. but as i don't have X i can't use these fantastic networkmanager tool and the old ifup wlan0 no longer works. but without networkmanager wifi is not working so my laptop is no longer usable! no X ati do not working, no wireless. all of my system has a wrong openssl version so eg ntp never start. after i manually get (with a pendrive) yum packages yum able to work but crash and ask me to send this bug to the developer (but still without network). there was some python 2.5 abi problem. how can a system critical tool like yum depend on such a broken thing like python? currently there is no way in installer to use rpm it use yum:-( after i update by hand a few dozen of packages with rpm yum start to work. now the worst part after i already install f11 yum show 2069 packages to update!!! just one month after the release! my system consist of 2059 packages at the same time yum download 2069 packages to update! what the hell i doing??? why do i upgrade the system for a half days if i upgrade all of my packages. why do i need a dvd iso? this download is more then the whole iso! and the real annoying part after i upgrade a few thousands of packages is the sound no longer works! there is no volume control i can't play even a wav file with play ...wav. is it so difficult thing? in 2009 it's a big requirement that an operating system be able to play a wav file? anyway nothing is working no sound at all skype is no longer works. tv tunner card no longer works. why anybody try to push this pulse stuff!? it's known to broken no one like it it's very early in development. after each fedora release a real big part of the mailing list traffic is about pulseaudio. let's just exclude it out and try to use it after 2012. are you really wanna suck so much with it? and the firefox and thunderbird betas... why? do we really need to be so cutting edge? they are broken and crash too often:-( thunderbird has no google calendar provider (while it had in f10) so it's worse then in f10. there is a testing thunderbird-lightening which has no corresponding thunderbird release (f11 was released on 9th juli:-) on a simple on borad intel video card X/gnome crash daily. and i could be list many other problems. so i really thing that's the worst then ever release of fedora. and tend to agree with dag that fedora is not suitable even for the desktop/workstation world. and i can't say anything those ubuntu users who said it's working in ububtu:-( if rhel 6 will be released i'll push a new company policy that no one can use fedora (it's so much problem for the users and the support that it's not worth for it) even as a desktop os just centos 6. a really angry fedora user. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Fortunately the usual updating fedora-release, yum upgrade approach > > worked on my boxes. I'd avoid preupgrade anyway it seems to like breaking > > systems and leaving them half upgraded so you have to rescue the mess by > > hand. > > I don't even upgrade anymore. I just keep two partitions (Logical > Volumes actually)--one for Fedora N and one for Fedora N+1. I always > do a fresh install, formatting the partition from the older install. > This has the advantage of providing a backup in case the new Fedora > doesn't work so well. Eventually, when updates to the new Fedora fix > the most annoying bugs, I switch to using it full time. and it's a shame! it's not windows when we need to reinstall and reboot with every install. or if it's know to be broken then remove the option to upgrade. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > "all of my system has a wrong openssl version" > > all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly wrong. I've seen > preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's the main reason > I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet. > i use fedora install dvd in this case! if it's do a half upgrade then it's also the bug of the installer. > "i already install f11 yum show 2069 packages to update!!! just one month > after the release! my system consist of 2059" > > In other words your box didn't update to F11 in the first place, it just > updated a few things and exploded, which is what it tends to do. You were > basically running FC10 and a few random bits of FC11. as i wrote i use fedora install dvd! if it's jusr updated a few things then it's also the bug of the installer. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
how to disable boot time mount of encrypted volumes in f12?
hi, i've got an LUKS encrypted volume (lvm partition), which i used to mount manually (until now), but now fedora 12 try to mount it during boot and don't go further ie. waitong for the partition password. the partition is NOT in fstab or any other files in /etc/. so how can i disable the boot time mount of this partition? this is very annoying and make my computer unusable:-( thanks in advance. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
