Re: upgrade to F12, nautilus wont start - dbus
David Timms wrote:
On 11/21/2009 08:34 AM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
try to re-install nautilus:
yum reinstall nautilus
Oops, forgot to mention I had already done that. I have also now updated
to:
Nov 21 00:13:19 Updated: nautilus-extensions-2.28.1-4.fc12.i686
Nov 21 00:13:28 Updated: nautilus-2.28.1-4.fc12.i686
, from updates, with no change in behaviour.
DaveT.
--
I had same problem after fresh Fedora 12 i686 install with specifiing
rpmfusion-{,non}free additional (NFS) repos at install time. What
is interesting - on several F12 desktop machines with very similar
SW configuration this problem appears on two of them, rest worked
fine. Only thing I noticed - one is notebook, second desktop, but both
have Intel graphics (GM965 resp. 82G35), and on both nautilus freeze,
with symptoms as You wrote. Manually started nautilus on good as well
as affected machines give similar messages as You wrote in Your previous
post.
Removing "gstreamer-plugins-bad" solve this problem.
Additionaly, I found that when I (with uninstalled gstreamer-plugins-bad
package) I run totem, brasero or other gstreamer app, then is created
~/.gstreamer-0.10/registry.i386.bin file. And when I then install
gstreamer-plugins-bad (and ev. -extras), then now nautilus and gstreamer
apps are working OK.
As F12 is 3 weeks out and there are few reports about this issue, then
I think there must be several conditions accomplished for in order to
appear.
Was You filled bugreport about this problem? (but I'm not sure how
make it, as "gstreamer-plugins-bad" isn't Fedora official repo. Maybe
someone there in list cope with it)
Maybe this help, regards, Franta Hanzlik
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Faxing suggestions
Gary Stainburn wrote: Hi folks, For the first time in ages I'm setting up a network fax facility. Last time I did this I used hylafax, but doing a yum search doesn't show this any more. Before I start looking any deeper, are there (better) alternatives out there? The plan is to the PBX's at each site to redirect all incoming faxes to a single PC on that site, which will then receive these incoming faxes and then forward them, probably using SMTP to a central web server for archiving and user retrieval. At the moment I'm not looking at sending faxes, but may do in future. Hylafax is IMHO still best faxing solution with many clients supporting it. But Hylafax was forked, and its version at Sourceforge called Hylafax+ ( http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/ ) is maybe better than original version at http://www.hylafax.org/ (at least releases are more frequent). Both sites have hylafax as Fedora .rpm and .src.rpm too, and isn't problem compile these under Fedora. Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to set cursor in editor to pattern given on command line?
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 02Nov2009 11:27, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
| steve wrote:
|>On 11/02/2009 12:58 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
|>>Hello all,
|>>[...snip...]
|>>Just something as "+/{pattern}" option in vim editor does.
|>>
|>>I want offer to (unexperienced) users edit (in shell script) some
|>>configuration files, and this should be done with some simple editor
|>>(no Emacs or vi). I think e.g. joe or mcedit is simple enough for
|>>these users, but joe nor mcedit cann't? probably? solve this demand
|>>(joe's command line option for jump to given line number (+nnn) isn't
|>>too much useable for this).
|>
|>This is a fairly common requirement when distributing applications which
|>may need config file changes, to inexperienced uses. My approach is
|>generally to provide a command rather have the users open an editor, eg:
|>
|>$ sed -i -e "s/foo = LOOK_FOR/foo = REPLACEMENT/" foo.conf
|>
|>of course you could precede that with something like ...
|
| I agree that variant with sed is in many respects more foolproof than
| direct editing, but in my case this isn't practical, as users need to
| see (and occasionally change) surrounding text too. Thus, classical
| editor is needed...
Ok, you'll have to to this on a per-editor basis, alas.
If joe has a +nnn option, try:
# or egrep, depend what flavour regexp you're offering
n=`grep -n "$pattern"<"$file" | sed 's/:.*//'`
joe "+$n" "$file"
You'll need to work out variations for other editors, alas.
--
Hello Mr. Cameron and James,
thank You for these suggestion. I didn't want just jump to line with
searched text, because lines in edited files are long - sometimes up to
300-400 chars (sorry, I'm not author of them :). Then, I want jump right
on the edited text. At present it appears as simple editors cannot do
this. I have working solution in vim:
$ vim -i NONE -S <(echo -e "/SrchdPattern...\\zs/\nnormal n") EditedFile
("...\\zs/\nnormal n" construct is there because I want edit text 3 chars
after searching pattern).
It seems as my users will must know several vim commands. Or they will
had lesser comfort with some simpler editor.
Regards, Franta Hanzlik
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to set cursor in editor to pattern given on command line?
steve wrote:
On 11/02/2009 12:58 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Hello all,
[...snip...]
Just something as "+/{pattern}" option in vim editor does.
I want offer to (unexperienced) users edit (in shell script) some
configuration files, and this should be done with some simple editor
(no Emacs or vi). I think e.g. joe or mcedit is simple enough for
these users, but joe nor mcedit cann't? probably? solve this demand
(joe's command line option for jump to given line number (+nnn) isn't
too much useable for this).
This is a fairly common requirement when distributing applications which
may need config file changes, to inexperienced uses. My approach is
generally to provide a command rather have the users open an editor, eg:
$ sed -i -e "s/foo = LOOK_FOR/foo = REPLACEMENT/" foo.conf
of course you could precede that with something like ...
"""
...edit the file in the editor of your choice and change foo = ...
OR
execute the commands below ...
"""
hth,
regards,
- steve
--
Hi Steve,
I agree that variant with sed is in many respects more foolproof than
direct editing, but in my case this isn't practical, as users need to
see (and occasionally change) surrounding text too. Thus, classical
editor is needed...
Regards, Franta
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
How to set cursor in editor to pattern given on command line?
Hello all,
I have rather general problem than Fedora specific:
is there some simple (the simpler the better) console editor,
in which is possible to specify string (or, better, pattern) on
its command line so that editor after start will locate in edited
file this pattern and will set cursor on it?
Just something as "+/{pattern}" option in vim editor does.
I want offer to (unexperienced) users edit (in shell script) some
configuration files, and this should be done with some simple editor
(no Emacs or vi). I think e.g. joe or mcedit is simple enough for
these users, but joe nor mcedit cann't? probably? solve this demand
(joe's command line option for jump to given line number (+nnn) isn't
too much useable for this).
Thanks in advance,
Frantisek Hanzlik
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: MTRR survey: better X performance on systems with 3G or more RAM
D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: == What I'd like to know about your system: Computer brand and model (or motherboard info): video controller: X video driver: RAM: distro: MTRR problem: Fix: glxgears performance change: I tried it on HW: Asus P5E-VM HDMI MB with G35 chipset video Intel GMA X3500, with "intel" driver 4GB RAM Fedora 10 with kernels 2.6.29.1-15.fc10.i686 and 2.6.29.1-15.fc10.i686.PAE (from koji). "grep write-combining /proc/mtrr" with both kernels produce no output, after boot with "enable_mtrr_cleanup", "grep write-combining /proc/mtrr" gives on both kernels output: reg06: base=0x0d000 ( 3328MB), size= 256MB, count=2: write-combining And glxgears outputs: 1) kernel 2.6.29.1-15.fc10.i686 : before: 2262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 452.307 FPS 2272 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.345 FPS 2262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 452.399 FPS 2262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 452.339 FPS after boot with "enable_mtrr_cleanup": 7456 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1491.186 FPS 7456 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1491.004 FPS 7468 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1493.462 FPS 7469 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1493.752 FPS 7472 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1494.248 FPS 2) 2.6.29.1-15.fc10.i686.PAE : before: 2262 frames in 5.0 seconds = 452.368 FPS 2272 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.229 FPS 2270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 453.898 FPS 2271 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.167 FPS 2272 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.309 FPS 2271 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.163 FPS after boot with "enable_mtrr_cleanup": 6270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1253.902 FPS 6276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1255.051 FPS 6276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1255.004 FPS 6274 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1254.667 FPS 6223 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1244.498 FPS Performance with kernel without PAE support is (with "enable_mtrr_cleanup") about 15% better compared to kernel with PAE. Compiling Your "mtrr-uncover" fails: cc -Wall -gmtrr-uncover.c -o mtrr-uncover mtrr-uncover.c:114: error: ‘mtrr_type’ redeclared as different kind of symbol /usr/include/asm/mtrr.h:70: error: previous declaration of ‘mtrr_type’ was here make: *** [mtrr-uncover] Error 1 My "/usr/include/asm/mtrr.h" at line 70 declare "mtrr_type" as (lines 68-70): ... /* In the Intel processor's MTRR interface, the MTRR type is always held in an 8 bit field: */ typedef __u8 mtrr_type; ... Regards, Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
panini - tool for creating perspective views
Not sure when it's right practice, I found interesting (for me and maybe for others too) program "panini": http://sourceforge.net/projects/pvqt/ I made .spec, icon and .desktop file for it, and RPMS/SRPMS packages for F9 and F10. They are at: http://hanzlici.cz/packages/fedora/panini/ I hope they maybe useful for someone. Regards, Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
Bill Davidsen wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: rpm -q --whatrequires openssl repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps openssl Not only does rpm -q only mention deps from packages you have installed, it also only checks deps on the package name, not on the library soname, which most deps are. So your question is not only hijacking a thread, but also stupid. (It's not getting updated because it'd break the entire f***ing distro, duh!) It would certainly require rebuilding all of the things which use the package. I'm not sure that "break the entire distro" has the same meaning as "be too much work." It's not clear to me, and I would like to have some guideline on this, how upgrades really work in Fedora (as opposed to the "supported for a year" statement). It seems that some packages like the kernel get upgraded regularly for a year, while some get upgraded for six months until the next release, and others get bugfix versions without an upgrade, at any time in the year after the official release date. If Fedora is a cutting edge release, how long after the release date should updates be supplied? Most of us are only about a month or six weeks into FC10, and I personally feel that it's early for the phrase "in fc11" to be used relative to existing features. I won't quote the source on that, because it may be something which was more or less private information, but it was not about something new, just an upgrade to something in fc9 and fc10. As for the question of the original hijacker, I would say versions are just another "mine is bigger than yours" ego trip in many cases, but if the claim that Outlook works with FC7 and not FC10, then I think the term is "regression" and the poster has a point. I don't have a Windows environment to test the claims, but I don't hear people telling him that it's his config or anything. I have a case where I run FC9 and FC10 clients against a RH9 (yes, really) mail system, and it works. In this my case probably problem isn't in openssl package, but in Fedora 10 CA-certificates (/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt). Several hours ago I was filled bug about it ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479484 ) Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
Kevin Kofler wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: rpm -q --whatrequires openssl repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps openssl Not only does rpm -q only mention deps from packages you have installed, it also only checks deps on the package name, not on the library soname, which most deps are. So your question is not only hijacking a thread, but also stupid. (It's not getting updated because it'd break the entire f***ing distro, duh!) Kevin Kofler Kevin, thank for you explanation. It's amazing - repoquery return over 500 packages, and although many of whom are from one source rpm, it is still much more that "rpm -q --whatrequires" list. And this list looks reputable. About hijacking a thread I was already apologized, there wasn't any bad intention from me. I not think my question is stupid - when Fedora distro has been released every half of year, then IMHO isn't big problem compile entire this against actual openssl package - in Fedora 10 case against "openssl-0.9.8i". And then I was understand when bugfixes from 0.9.8j to it. And sorry for probable my other mistake - my "f*" should mean "Fedora Core and consequent", there wasn't no "ing" at end of it. One other justification for my bad English knowledge. Sorry. Franta Hanzlík -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
Rick Stevens wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: Rick Stevens wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: After upgrading from F7 to F10 it's unable (for me, but on several sites) access to sendmail daemon with authenticated access by either TLS (port 25) or SSL (port 465) protocols from M$ Outlook (Express too). I still make on right description this issue, its look like some problem in certificate exchange. But no matter how it's related with, surprising for me is fact, that Fedora 10 uses openssl package version 0.9.8g released in 2007, while actual released version is 0.9.8j, four versions newer. If you check the source RPM's spec file, you'll see that most (if not all) of the "j" patches have been backported to the "g" version. The trick is that the "j" version bumps the .so for /lib[64]/libcrypto.so.7 and /lib[64]/libssl.so.7 from ".7" to ".8" and a lot of existing code would break because they want .7. Hope that explains it for you. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer ri...@nerd.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate - -- Rick, thank for Your response. But - yes, I know just was released F10 openssl pkg 0.9.8g release 12, and I read it's changelog, thus I know what was backported to this. But I'm not agree about You these "lot of existing code would break because ..", as when I ask: rpm -q --whatrequires openssl tinyca2-0.7.5-4.fc10.noarch dovecot-1.1.7-1.fc10.i386 openldap-servers-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386 nash-6.0.71-3.fc10.i386 NetworkManager-0.7.0-1.git20090102.fc10.i386 sendmail-8.14.3-3.fc10.i386 openssl-devel-0.9.8g-12.fc10.i386 openssl-perl-0.9.8g-12.fc10.i386 (and I have relative large system with packages from rpmfusion, dries, atrpms, planetccrma and others) - thus, I think, only packages depend on openssl are some little from Fedora own repository. I'm right? Those are only the ones you have installed (rpm only queries your installed packages). There are probably others in the repos (not sure if yum can query for "list everything dependent on openssl"). On top of that, you also have to consider people (such as myself) that don't just install RPM-based packages, but have built them from source tarballs and the like. While the general rule is to simply link against the ".so" version of a library, many packages specifically link against the ".so.(version)" of the libraries to ensure they have specific APIs that may not exist in earlier versions. Unfortunately there's no "link against .so.7 or later" option in the linker (or if there is, it's not often used). Thus, if you installed a libssl.so.8 and DIDN'T create (or replace) a ".so.7" symlink which points at the new .8 version to satisfy existing packages (and remember, there are some F9 packages in F10), your code won't run. That's why they backport the patches and ship a heavily modified "g" version (which retains the .so.7) instead of a (newer) "j" version (with the new .so.8). -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer ri...@nerd.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - When in doubt, mumble. - -- You are right, there is perhaps lots more packages depended on openssl, what rpm isn't able list. But yet - IMHO create symlink ".so.7" to new ".so.8" is I think very simple, and may be done with little patch in openssl Makefile, or in RPM install script - energy to maintain and backport bugfixes to old code must be much greater and probably isn't real maintain it over and over again. Frantisek Hanzlík -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
Rick Stevens wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: After upgrading from F7 to F10 it's unable (for me, but on several sites) access to sendmail daemon with authenticated access by either TLS (port 25) or SSL (port 465) protocols from M$ Outlook (Express too). I still make on right description this issue, its look like some problem in certificate exchange. But no matter how it's related with, surprising for me is fact, that Fedora 10 uses openssl package version 0.9.8g released in 2007, while actual released version is 0.9.8j, four versions newer. If you check the source RPM's spec file, you'll see that most (if not all) of the "j" patches have been backported to the "g" version. The trick is that the "j" version bumps the .so for /lib[64]/libcrypto.so.7 and /lib[64]/libssl.so.7 from ".7" to ".8" and a lot of existing code would break because they want .7. Hope that explains it for you. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer ri...@nerd.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate - -- Rick, thank for Your response. But - yes, I know just was released F10 openssl pkg 0.9.8g release 12, and I read it's changelog, thus I know what was backported to this. But I'm not agree about You these "lot of existing code would break because ..", as when I ask: rpm -q --whatrequires openssl tinyca2-0.7.5-4.fc10.noarch dovecot-1.1.7-1.fc10.i386 openldap-servers-2.4.12-1.fc10.i386 nash-6.0.71-3.fc10.i386 NetworkManager-0.7.0-1.git20090102.fc10.i386 sendmail-8.14.3-3.fc10.i386 openssl-devel-0.9.8g-12.fc10.i386 openssl-perl-0.9.8g-12.fc10.i386 (and I have relative large system with packages from rpmfusion, dries, atrpms, planetccrma and others) - thus, I think, only packages depend on openssl are some little from Fedora own repository. I'm right? Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
Todd Denniston wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote, On 01/08/2009 05:42 PM: After upgrading from F7 to F10 it's unable (for me, but on several sites) I wonder if I can be the first in this thread to ask you to read the following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines#Starting_a_New_Subject BTW what bugzilla number? Hello Todd and all Fedora users, I'm sorry for my posting (I know what you referenced) - - I was (excuse me) too lazy for creating new mail and I take some in fedora-list (reason only for not typing list address by hand), erase it's body and then I type my post. And just I see in my outcomming mail header keyword "References: " from original mail, which was probably main matter of my mistake. Please, I have sent my post again? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Why Fedora 10 still uses openssl pkg from 2007, 4 releases old?
After upgrading from F7 to F10 it's unable (for me, but on several sites) access to sendmail daemon with authenticated access by either TLS (port 25) or SSL (port 465) protocols from M$ Outlook (Express too). I still make on right description this issue, its look like some problem in certificate exchange. But no matter how it's related with, surprising for me is fact, that Fedora 10 uses openssl package version 0.9.8g released in 2007, while actual released version is 0.9.8j, four versions newer. Although this question is probably for Fedora developers, I hope anyone will know answer to this. Thanks, Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How send special keystrokes to guest (w2k8) system?
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: I just install w2k8 server guest at Fedora 10 host (HW:FS PRIMERGY SX330S1, 2x Quad Opteron 2352 with virtualization support) with kvm virtualization. All works probably fine, but I cann't send keystrokes as CTRL+ALT+DEL to guest. I tried: - disable handling special keys (CTRL+ALT+) in X server (settable in GNOME keyboard properties) - use "Send key" feature in virt-manager v0.6.0 (offers sending CTRL+ALT+DEL, CTRL+ALT+Backspace, Printscreen and CTRL+ALT+Fx keystrokes) - somewhere mentioned CTRL+CTRL+CTRL+ALT+DEL combination but all without success. Probably I'm doing something wrong, can someone push me forward? On host I use Fedora 10 distro, 2.6.27.7-130.fc10.i686 SMP kernel, kvm-74-6.fc10.i386, libvirt-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386, virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.i386 OK, solved - problem is probably in Fedora 10 "gtk-vnc-0.3.7-3.fc10.i386" library, maybe in Fedora-special patches. When I compile and instal actual gtk-vnc v0.3.8 (without any additional patches), then all work fine. I will file bugzilla report about this. Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
How send special keystrokes to guest (w2k8) system?
I just install w2k8 server guest at Fedora 10 host (HW:FS PRIMERGY SX330S1, 2x Quad Opteron 2352 with virtualization support) with kvm virtualization. All works probably fine, but I cann't send keystrokes as CTRL+ALT+DEL to guest. I tried: - disable handling special keys (CTRL+ALT+) in X server (settable in GNOME keyboard properties) - use "Send key" feature in virt-manager v0.6.0 (offers sending CTRL+ALT+DEL, CTRL+ALT+Backspace, Printscreen and CTRL+ALT+Fx keystrokes) - somewhere mentioned CTRL+CTRL+CTRL+ALT+DEL combination but all without success. Probably I'm doing something wrong, can someone push me forward? On host I use Fedora 10 distro, 2.6.27.7-130.fc10.i686 SMP kernel, kvm-74-6.fc10.i386, libvirt-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386, virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.i386 -- Thanks in advance, Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: D-Link DGE-550SX (dl2k): WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d()
Roger Heflin wrote: Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: Hello, we just upgraded our old router (Fedora Core 5 on AlphaServer 800, kernel 2.6.17) to new Fedora 10/2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 kernel on Core2Duo i686. PCI-X Fiber 1000BASE-SX D-Link Network Adapter DGE-550SX, which worked fine in old Alphaserver, freeze on new machine few minutes after start (What is interesting, in one case after it sent exactly 8192 packets, an other cases are some multiples of 8 too) and stop transmit packets. Only workaround (but for a while) is rmmod + modprobe its dl2k driver. I would go post this to the kernel list, is is definitely some sort of kernel interaction. From what I understand the sch_generic.c error means that the networking driver has an issue with its hardware. I don't believe there is a way to misconfigure things and get this. On other network chipsets others have attempted to work around this sort of issue by changing how the network chipset works (turning on/off tcp offload, or other internal network chipset capabilities, and/or turning off pause-things can be adjusted with ethtool). If you get the correct feature turned off that is required to trigger the bug then it may work. Keep in mind though that typically when you have a 32bit/33Mhz network card it appears that the speed is limited to around 50MB/second each way, even though the PCI bandwidth should be high enough to do more.I don't know why this is, but I have seen it with several different ethernet chipsets (tg3/e1000). Hello Roger, I sent this issue to LKML too (by that time without feedback). About some tunning - we have only little time window every dat for it, it is really problem. For now we will try some other optical fiber card. And regarding to PCI card bandwidth - DGE-550SX is gigabit card, but we use it for our internet connections, which is limited to approx. 50 Mb/sec by ISP, then I think there should be no bottleneck in LAN card. Or some crappy machines within our LAN could be able overload it? But this same card in much slower Alphaserver work fine... Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
D-Link DGE-550SX (dl2k): WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d()
Hello, we just upgraded our old router (Fedora Core 5 on AlphaServer 800, kernel 2.6.17) to new Fedora 10/2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 kernel on Core2Duo i686. PCI-X Fiber 1000BASE-SX D-Link Network Adapter DGE-550SX, which worked fine in old Alphaserver, freeze on new machine few minutes after start (What is interesting, in one case after it sent exactly 8192 packets, an other cases are some multiples of 8 too) and stop transmit packets. Only workaround (but for a while) is rmmod + modprobe its dl2k driver. /var/log/messages contains following messages: Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [ cut here ] Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d() Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1 (Sundance Technology IPG Triple-Speed Ethernet): transmit timed out Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: Modules linked in: hwmon_vid hwmon nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp xt_comment iptable_nat nf_nat cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_multipath uinput snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device dl2k snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm ipg snd_timer snd_page_alloc snd_hwdep snd i2c_i801 firewire_ohci i2c_core soundcore pcspkr r8169 mii firewire_core crc_itu_t raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 [last unloaded: microcode] Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 #1 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] warn_slowpath+0x4b/0x6c Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? mempool_resize+0x15c/0x183 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? __slab_free+0x63/0x26e Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? kmem_cache_free+0x71/0xa7 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? __slab_free+0x63/0x26e Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? blk_remove_plug+0x66/0x92 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? elv_queue_empty+0x20/0x22 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? blk_run_queue+0x28/0x2c Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? scsi_run_queue+0x250/0x27c Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? kobject_put+0x37/0x3c Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? strlcpy+0x17/0x49 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? scsi_device_unbusy+0x6b/0x70 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] run_timer_softirq+0x14b/0x1bb Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x12d Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x12d Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] __do_softirq+0x84/0x109 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? __do_softirq+0x0/0x109 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] do_softirq+0x77/0xdb Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0xc0 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] irq_exit+0x44/0x83 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] do_IRQ+0xe7/0xfe Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] common_interrupt+0x28/0x30 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0x162/0x19d Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] cpuidle_idle_call+0x67/0x97 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] cpu_idle+0x101/0x134 Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: [] start_secondary+0x197/0x19f Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: === Nov 25 19:05:12 ns kernel: ---[ end trace fd7fa9607e312047 ]--- Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [ cut here ] Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d() Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth1 (Sundance Technology IPG Triple-Speed Ethernet): transmit timed out Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: Modules linked in: hwmon_vid hwmon nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp xt_comment iptable_nat nf_nat cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_multipath uinput dl2k i2c_i801 pcspkr r8169 ipg mii i2c_core firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 [last unloaded: microcode] Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: Pid: 9941, comm: mail Not tainted 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686 #1 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] warn_slowpath+0x4b/0x6c Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? mempool_resize+0x15c/0x183 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? bio_free+0x40/0x44 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? bio_fs_destructor+0xe/0x11 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? bio_put+0x26/0x28 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? virt_to_head_page+0x22/0x2e Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? queue_flag_clear+0x18/0x54 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? __freed_request+0x6b/0x72 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? __enqueue_entity+0xe3/0xeb Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? enqueue_entity+0x203/0x20b Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? strlcpy+0x17/0x49 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] dev_watchdog+0xda/0x12d Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? do_IRQ+0xe7/0xfe Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] run_timer_softirq+0x14b/0x1bb Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x12d Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x12d Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] __do_softirq+0x84/0x109 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] ? __do_softirq+0x0/0x109 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] do_softirq+0x77/0xdb Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] irq_exit+0x44/0x83 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x7c Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: [] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2d/0x34 Nov 25 19:29:33 ns kernel: []
Re: Fedora 9 Active.repo for passwdgen
In dries repo is passwdgen-2.2-2.fc8.rf.i386.rpm for Fedora 8, it shall working fine on F9. Or You can download SRPMS and rebuild this for F9. Franta Hanzlik Frank Murphy wrote: On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:12 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: On Saturday 05 July 2008 13:02:09 Frank Murphy wrote: Is there an active repo for "passwdgen" for Fedora 9. I can find it on google as an rpm. But prefer to use a repo for ease of updates. searching in pbone should answer that question Anne Seems to be in dries, but only goes to fc4, and yum gave a 404 for it. Frank -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
