Re: Orphaned some packages
2009/12/21, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com: I tried to push the Take ownership button on python-rabbyt's devel branch and it worked. Then I pushed Release Ownership. That worked too. Do you get an error message when you use those buttons? Are you logged in? Sometimes there is a Verify Login button that pops up on upper right of the page for some reason. You need to click on that. Hi Orcan, I tried it until it works. Request failed was the message. I had to click in Take ownership about 5 times. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaned some packages
2009/12/19, Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org: griv: A GTK-Chat based on the RIV-Chat-protocol Bugs: 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/griv python-rabbyt: Sprite library for Python Bugs: 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/python-rabbyt I will take these 2! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaned some packages
2009/12/21, Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com: 2009/12/19, Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org: griv: A GTK-Chat based on the RIV-Chat-protocol Bugs: 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/griv python-rabbyt: Sprite library for Python Bugs: 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/python-rabbyt I will take these 2! I can't take these 2. Please help me! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review swaps
2009/12/17, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Anyone interested in swapping a couple of package reviews? I currently try to review 2 of your previous review request. you should finish them first -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Exception request from FESCo for bundled libaries
2009/12/14, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net: The guidelines should be read as: « Bundling any other component your component depends on in the same package is forbidden; each component should be packaged separately in its own package for legal and maintenance reasons » This is more a wishful thinking than a practical thing The guidelines should be a system of rules without place for everyone to interprete in it what he/she wants to see in the guidelines. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Exception request from FESCo for bundled libaries
of course this is a practicable rule, BUT the problem is upstream or the rule itself. kernels internal zlib is not a lib its a module, wordpress internal php-gettext is not a lib, its a php code file. The trick is to declare that a lib is not a lib and you can close the bug as not a bug... Easy cake.. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Exception request from FESCo for bundled libaries
2009/12/6, Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544720 This is not a lib! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: A silly question about our FC tag
2009/11/17, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br: because renaming it will cause problems, for example. foo-1.0.fc10 foo-1.0.fc11 foo-1.0.fc11 foo-1.0.fc10 foo-1.0.fc10 foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10 rpmdev-vercmp foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10 0:foo-1.0.fc10 is newer Imho your argument is obsolete, because we rebuild all Packages for Massbranching, so the release is in every new branch higher, than in the branch before! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 2.6.30.9-90.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?
I think this is a script which reads your currently used architecture and provide a dl link. please insert a x86_64 livecd and try it again! 2009/11/18, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com: I noticed that http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora appears to be strongly promoting i386 Fedora over x86_64. Is this intentional or an oversight? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 2.6.30.9-90.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora Moblin remix
Hi all, Moblin is afaik Intel processors only. Would this work because of the fedora fundament on other processors like a via with 733mhz, too? 2009/11/6, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/5 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Hi All, For those interested there's a new test LiveCD of Fedora Moblin remix [1] for those that are interesting in playing. It would be nice to have some feedback on good or bad issues with it. There's been almost 1300 downloads since I announced the last one but I've had no feedback what so ever and while I'd like to assume that's because its perfect I doubt that is the case. * I booted it for the first time some minutes ago on an Asus eeepc 900 (no atom, just a celeron). I actually never installed vanilla moblin because in their site atom is a requirement. * Boot is somewhat slow but it could depend on my crappy usb key, or because netbooks are crap themselves; after gdm login, the graphics go unexpectedly *FAST* and *SMOOTH* ! Cool, I need to look closer at the boot to see what can improved. I'm been too busy for my own good of late so haven't had a chance to look closely at this bit. * Just before graphical boot screen, for some seconds i can see: -- render error detected, EIR: 0x0010 page table error PGTBL_ER: 0x0100 [drm:i915_handle_error] *ERROR* EIR stuck: 0x010, masking render error detected, EIR: 0x0010 page table error PGTBL_ER: 0x0100 -- however, everything seems to run just right after that. Is it recorded in dmesg. It might be worth reporting a bug with all the details. * Where's wifi configuration? isn't there a graphical tool to configure it? asking my gf to get it up on a shell is a no-no. It should be in the top right corner of the top panel. Just to the left of the volume control. From memory the eeePC 900 has an atheros card so it should work OK. * I mounted a touchscreen in my eeepc, and moblin gui looks much more friendly to that interface. However i couldnt install the manufacturer software (eGalax), because i think an autoloaded module interferes with it (generic-usb?). On F11 nothing get autoloaded and touchscreen works fine. I need some more testing to figure this out. Do they have an open driver? Maybe its supported in F-12 and I just need to make sure the right package is included to support it. Thanks for the report. Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 2.6.30.9-90.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Wodim trouble
2009/11/3 Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu In this case, upstream (wodim) is a fork of Joerg Schilling's project. Wodim was forked from cdrecord because Joerg is crazy. Joerg likes to call wodim the broken fork and cdrecord the original software. He visited all the booths of linux distributions at Chemnitzer Linux Tage and started some trouble. The ML and BZ of the Linuxdistros, which are using wodim is the outlet of Jörgs furious anger about the fork and the debian maintainer who is the upstream coder of wodim! There was already a 'wodim vs. cdrecord' discussion at fedora-legal-list. I have a big respect for Jörg, not for him as person, but for his attainments! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Wodim trouble
2009/11/3, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de: Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com wrote: It seems that you have not been there. I was there and I was shocked about your behavior. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Wodim trouble
2009/11/3, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de: Fortunately, you are of limited relevance and other people did not behave hostile but friendly ;-) Sorry Joerg, but Imho it isn't friendly to come to a booth, thump the table and say: Remove illegal software from fedora distribution, mature at the end of the year, or I will sue you. This isn't a friendly way. The booth-personnel and the bystanders didn't know with this action WHO you are or WHAT do you really want.. btw it's imho a little bit duffy to come with this request to a booth on an event like Chemnitzer Linux Tage. The quality of the content of your Messages sometimes extremly differs from your behavior, your way how you tell it. Perhaps it is me (as a woman) who is very sensitive in that case. Perhaps this is sometimes the reason that differs the pov of your counterpart you have the point from you are a troll. Think about it, perhaps twice! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: updating F11 GNOME release
2009/11/3 Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain how much I enjoyed that distribution. mmh, the Gnome Desktop Live CD of F12 is really more gnomish since the CDs before. No qt, no openoffice, abiword gnumeric is still missing and epiphany should replace the firefox, but hey It's not perfect, but better than before! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
This discussion smells of fish! °)))o °)))o °)))o °)))o o(((° o(((° o(((° o(((° -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
2009/10/19 Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroubl...@gmail.com This is really a stupid thread. Of course! But who is the stupid? The one who started this thread or those who answered it or those who wasting so much time to discuss about nonsense? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
OMG Even 4chan is funnier than you -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
2009/10/19 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org Well, this thread was disputable. But you crossed a line here. Some idiots on this planet grab the same statement all the time when they run out of arguments. This is not even acceptable as a tongue in the cheek. https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list +1 -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
2009/9/14 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com Hi, everyone. We - the QA group - have recently been researching the feasibility of using zsync to reduce the size of live image downloads. This has hit a roadblock in the form of the problem where both rsync and zsync use forked zlibs rather than linking against the system copy. Imho, allow zsync for fedora. If you can solve the zlib-problem of rsync, the problem of zsync will be solved as well, cause the integrity of zsync in fedora fails on rsync-compatibility, which needs a forked zlib. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
2009/9/29 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Are we removing rsync from the distribution? I hope not. What is your argumentation for keeping rsync, even it doesn't meet the fedora guidelines? What is with the other packages which doesn't meet the guidelines? I believe there are no consequences for packages they are already in. no one cares. zsync seems to bean an exception! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
2009/9/29 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Of course we care about existing packages; Oh, really? There exist a tracker for bugs with duplicated libs. There are not really activities on these bugs. Perhaps the maintainers ( not that I blame them) are not interessted in solving these bugs. Like the open bugs for switching to PolicyKit. Or the discussion of flags. It seems to me they fizzled out So the most of these bugs will fizzled out, if there is no one (of the higher ranks in the fedoraproject, maybe redhat?) who take care of the implemention of the guidelines! Seems that violations of the guidelines are not so important like the violation of the Trademark (The hunting of fedora related sites, like blogs or forums with adhesions contracts)... Are the project related activities are out of balance? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Webmin for Fedora 11+
It has to been clean out of the source. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Webmin for Fedora 11+
btw. what was the reason for debian to drop webmin? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
2009/9/29 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org Bundling a library is not ideal but removing rsync would be a extreme step. I believe this isn't a technical problem, more a psychological one. Fedora is a (software) technic orientated project, or? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Packaging Webmin for Fedora 11+
2009/9/29 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com Dunno, maybe the fact that webmin is a weapon of mass destruction. ;) Afairr it is/was one. Bring it to fedora won't be a good idea?! -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync
Hey, I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias answer (comment 3) http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/ -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: how to become a co-maintainer for an _existing_ RPM pkg
I want to become a maintainer too and I want to impress with some unofficial reviews. Don't really know if this is socially accepted to nag in other reviews without having an open review request -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Review needed....
Perhaps it is luck, but I'm happy about that fact that not all contributors with an open review request begging on devel list for a reviewer. If anybody will do it, the devel list will explode with review beggars. It's strange to see that most of the baggers are working for a big north american distributor, or living in india, or both! No, I don't want a pony!!! Is it difficult to be patient? There are many more open reviews which are older... Please qry your friends (if you have some) or be patient.. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
KDE vs. GNOME on F10
Hi all. KDE 4.3 will come to F11 and F10. It's a cool thing. There aren't updates like this for Gnome. Why not? F10 with Gnome 2.26 sounds fine to me. -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sylpheed.spec, 1.100, 1.101
2009/7/28 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com You don't want to add ldconfig calls to the -devel package. Also, before shipping the API for this libsylph, keep an eye on the current discussion of it. means 2.7.0 comes to rawhide? -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:17:32 +0200 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org wrote: nopaste is back... http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:17:32 +0200 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org wrote: nopaste is back... http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. - Zitierten Text ausblenden - the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package
2009/7/26 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org nopaste is back... http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before -- Josephine Fine Tannhäuser 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package
2009/7/26 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org nopaste is back... http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for nopaste as Jason Farell mentoined in Bug #504108 Comment 10 before -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
