Re: Help wanted with dist-cvs to git conversion

2009-12-11 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 14:07, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:05 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
 2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
  For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
  domain would be sufficient, however we should have a discussion about
  whether to use this email address or to use the user's real email
  address.

 Definitely @fedoraproject.org email addresses. A lot of us use them
 even in Bugzilla, all my packages have the fp.o address in %changelog.
 I dont want to fiddle around when i change my real email address.
 Just pop in to FAS and change it there, done.

 A big -1 for this. Your A lot is in fact a tiny fraction and for
 some of us an e-mail address is important mean for identifying an user
 (Oh, this is John Doe of Canonical, ...).

I think no one will ever agree on this particular issue.

Maybe we could add a setting in FAS where each one can decide I want
to use my personal address or I want to use my @fp.o address. Then
when FAS is requested for an email address, it would answer the one
the user chose.

I know adding configuration is almost never a good idea, but in this
case, it might be the only way to avoid endless sterile flamewars. :-/


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: 190 packages with .la file(s)

2009-11-30 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi PY,

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:56, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
 Dear all,

 Looking at:
 $ yum whatprovides *.la |grep x86_64 |wc -l
 190
 surprises me a bit.

 Do we have 189 bugs waiting to be filled ? (I filled one this morning)
 I guess some of these cannot be changed but I guess some can.
[snip]
 sugar-base-0.86.0-1.fc12.x86_64 : Base Sugar library

I'm co-maintaining it, so I'll try to have a look at this one.

Thanks for the heads up.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-28 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Well, a couple of Fedoras back, X didn't work except with radeonhd, but now
 radeon appears to support this one as well; I switched to it, and the CPU
 issue is gone even with KMS.  Now fonts (esp small ones) look very smudgy
 though.  But I suppose there are already bug(s) open on this.

Don't suppose. Either search Bugzilla to see if that's the case, or
report it anyway.

If one keeps supposing the bug was already reported, it might never get fixed.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-27 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 3D cannot be essential to
 users of older hardware, since it turns their hardware into unresponsive mush.

How about visually impaired people? Compiz and the zoom plugin *are*
essential to them.

A friend of mine has an old computer, which is « turned into
unresponsive mush » by 3D, as you say. But at least, now he can read
what's on his screen, and thus actually use his computer. ;)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: livecds in the future

2009-11-23 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 For the really network starved, there is netinst.iso where you start
 with 200M~ and only download the specific packages you wish to install,
 minimally about 200 packages.

I think Ben is talking about /users/ with poor network access, the
ones who come on IRC asking for help because they have trouble
installing with the LiveCD. Not sure the netinst.iso would fit their
needs...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


PKI (Was: Re: Meeting Log - 2009-11-19)

2009-11-19 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 20:25  dgilmore mmcgrath: id like to try work on updating koji auth/ and 
 notifications during F-13 life cycle
 20:26  ricky PKI would be nice too :-)
 20:26 -!- |pitr| [n=kv...@91.150.139.57] has joined #fedora-meeting
 20:26  mmcgrath #idea updating koji auth and notifications
 20:26  mmcgrath #idea pki (ricky says he'll do this and it'll be done by 
 january)
 20:26  mmcgrath :-P
 20:26  * ricky runs
[snip]
 20:28  smooge pki?
 20:28  smooge sorry.. will talk off chan
 20:28  mmcgrath smooge: yeah our pki right now is very... ehh manual
 20:28  mmcgrath and not fun to manage :)

Not sure that's what you're looking for, but the guys I work with have
created this neat Python module to handle CAs and certs:
http://bitbucket.org/faide/pki/

It's free software (MIT or PSF).

Would that help ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Proposal: Python 3 in Fedora 13

2009-10-02 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 perl6

That's already a Fedora 12 feature.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rakudo_Perl_6


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: CVS1 and selinux

2009-09-21 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 15:49, Mike McGrath wrote:
 Selinux on cvs1 is now in enforcing mode.  Please keep an eye out for any
 oddities or broken services and let us know.

I'm curious, why was it disabled in the first place ?

I guess that's because of something that was discussed before I joined
this mailing-list, and I'm interested in knowing the problems that
arose (and the way they were fixed), just for the sake of learning :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Approval?

2009-09-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 Hey guys,

     Well I haven't been approved yet to join the sysadmin base group, so I
 don't think I can work on anything yet, am I? Well, I am currently in school
 right now and I'm not sure if there is anything I can do that fits my skill
 level. Any suggestions? When can I get approved?

Mike asked you this in the other thread you had opened:
  Welcome Eric, was there anything in particular you were interested in
  working on?

I also joined recently, so I might be wrong, but as I understood it,
now is not the time to be approved. You first have to actually do some
work, and get to know the group.

For example, if you're interested in the web apps side of the team's
job, you could start hacking on Bodhi, Koji, PackageDB, etc...

That's why you should first answer Mike's question IMHO, so that the
old timers here can guide you :)

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: bodhi formatting

2009-09-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 I wanted to be a good packager and include the upstream CHANGELOG lines
 in the update notes of bsf-2.4.0, but bodhi does not accept empty lines
 (error) nor linebreaks (ignored). How is that text supposed to be
 formatted?

For best results, you can use the MarkDown syntax.

Right now, PK understands it and will display it nicely.

I'm working on it on the Bodhi side, so that Bodhi displays it nicely
as well. Patches are available, waiting for Luke to accept them or ask
me to rework them :)
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/286


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licensing issue in OpenLayers package (already in Fedora)

2009-09-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 So, it is legally possible to do a clean room reimplementation of this
 code, but it does not look like that is what happened with the existing
 jsmin.py.

 Basically, what someone would have to do is to write a version of jsmin,
 looking only at an algorithm description, but never jsmin.c.

Ok, thanks for confirming this was a possibility.

 Red Hat Legal compared this jsmin.py to the jsmin.c code, and it is
 their opinion that it is not a clean-room reimplementation, but rather a
 conscious translation from C to Python.

 If I had to guess, if pressed, the jsmin.py author will admit to having
 looked at jsmin.c.

I actually asked him, to be sure, and that's what he told me as well,
that he simply translated into Python.

 So, you can either find someone to make a jsmin in a clean room
 reimplementation, then use it, or rework your package to not use it.

I removed the jsmin tools from the source tarball of OpenLayers and
rebuilt it for F-11 and Rawhide (I don't have the commit access in
F-10, and it will be EOL-ed soon anyway, if that really matters I'll
ask for the commit ACL and do it there as well).

In the future, I'll try to see if another Javascript minifier couldn't
be used instead of jsmin and what the OpenLayers devs think about it.

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: Adding a project to transifex

2009-09-07 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 23:17, Matthew Boothmbo...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 07/09/09 21:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:

 Matthew Booth wrote:

 I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the
 idea of adding my project.

 The translations are now hosted at http://transifex.net/ (the main
 Transifex
 instance).

 Was there an official announcement about that?

I think the guys at Indifex (the company that Dimitris and others
founded) only created transifex.net like a place to host translations,
just like Gitorious or Fedorahosted for hosting development, not as a
replacement of Fedora's Transifex instance.

So I guess you could host your project there, or in translate.fp.o.
The only difference is that there, you might have a much bigger
community of translators, not just Fedora translators.

For more informations, I suggest you ask the Infrastructure team in
#fedora-admin or on their mailing-list. They'll be more indicated to
answer you about hosting on translate.fp.o ;)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: rpm/mock: can't upbuild FC10 targets on FC9 host

2009-09-03 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Could the root cache be broken?

Incompatible changes in RPM between F9 and F10 ?

BTW, F9 was EOLed in July, so if it's broken now, I doubt it will be fixed.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: rpm/mock: can't upbuild FC10 targets on FC9 host

2009-09-03 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 So... run it as whom?

As your normal user. Just add it to the mock group:
# usermod -G mock your user


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora Test Day Summary - Sectool

2009-09-02 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I think part of the problem may have been that people (at least, me, and
 I take myself as generally representative of the typical super-lazy
 Fedora-using schlub :) don't know what sectool is, what it's for, and
 where it fits into Fedora...it sort of blindsided me when it showed up
 on the Test Day schedule, so I didn't know who to promote it to or how
 to sound exciting / excited about it. I hadn't really heard of sectool
 before it showed up on the schedule. Has it been discussed /
 introduced / hyped up on Planet before?

Sectool was a Fedora 10 feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecurityAudit


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora swag

2009-09-01 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 @Mathieu Bridon

 That is exactly the shop I've found. It would be nice to know if
 Spreadshirt spreads to more then just France. If it does, what are the
 possibility's and opinions on making that shop more internationally /
 European orientated?

Something awesome just happened.

The people at Spreadshirt France saw this message, and they wrote us
an email, to explain they had decided to transform the Fedora-Fr
account into a premium one, so that the shop would be available in
different languages.

Try it, now there is a language chooser at the top right \o/

Here is the list of countries where Spreadshirt will deliver:
http://www.spreadshirt.net/en/GB/Service/FAQ-1328/categoryId/8/articleId/542

 Resurrecting the Shop SIG sounds like an exiting idea to me and I've
 been playing with this idea since it came to me yesterday. Although I
 wouldn't know where to start. Does anyone have some good suggestions
 on this? I guess I'd have to add me to the list on the wiki as a
 start.

Basically, this is how anything happens in Fedora:
1. someone is motivated, starts doing things and tries to get others to join
2. ...

Actually there's no 2. :)

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora swag

2009-09-01 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 @Mathieu Bridon

 That is exactly the shop I've found. It would be nice to know if
 Spreadshirt spreads to more then just France. If it does, what are the
 possibility's and opinions on making that shop more internationally /
 European orientated?

 Something awesome just happened.

 The people at Spreadshirt France saw this message, and they wrote us
 an email, to explain they had decided to transform the Fedora-Fr
 account into a premium one, so that the shop would be available in
 different languages.

 Try it, now there is a language chooser at the top right \o/

Oh, and by the way, Spreadshirt people. Now I know you read this
mailing-list, so: thanks a lot! :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora swag

2009-08-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 After taking a little bit more time I bumped into an other
 possibility; a French web-shop which had a whole wardrobe of fedora
 clothing (and yet again very limited accessories). Besides that, I
 don't know French and I couldn't discover a possibility to switch to
 English (I might have not looked good enough though).

I suppose you're talking about this:
http://fedora-fr.spreadshirt.net/fr/FR/Shop

This is the shop that we (the french Fedora NPO) have set up to sell
swag and make a little income to finance events, media production,
etc...

It seems you can't select the english language as, well... the shop is
mainly for french people :)

However, I'm not sure Spreadshirt would even deliver the products to
the Netherlands. I'll try to have more informations about that.

 I also found out that there's a Fedora Shop SIG at
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Store (referring to this
 mailinglist). Unfortunately the most recent activity seems to be
 somewhere around in 2008. Now my actual question; is this SIG still
 alive and if not, how much interest is there to reincarnate it? I'd be
 happy to assist where I can.

 The reason that I'm asking here is because the page doesn't state on
 contacting a person or other mailing-list than this one.

Now, how do we have swag to distribute at events ? The answer is
simple: we (Fedora ambassadors) produce them.

Either the Fedora Project produces a lot of them and sends some to
local Ambassadors so they can distribute them, or the local teams
produce them themselves (that's what we do in France).

As an individual, I guess your best bet to have some swag would be to
attend an event, go to the Fedora booth and chat with the Ambassadors
there, I'm sure they'll give you some :)

Or, you could also try to ressuscitate the Shop SIG... :]

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Joining the Fedora Infrastructure team

2009-08-24 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

I'd like to join the Infrastructure team, so here is my introduction.

I'm a junior system engineer. I have a short (one year) experience
managing RHEL (2.1 to 5, yes we still have 2.1 in production :'( ) web
servers running J2EE applications with Apache/JOnAS (please, don't ask
me the versions of those two, you might have nightmares ^^').

I'm also getting familiar with TurboGears web applications as I'm
developing one myself. [1]

Finally, for the skills that might be of interest to the
Infrastructure team, I'm a Fedora package maintainer. [2]

My motivation for joining the Infrastructure team is that I feel like
I can help, even if only a little, and I'm sure I can learn a lot from
this (and I love learning :)

I'll try to be around this thursday for the IRC meeting. Let me know
if there's something I can do in the meantime.

Best regards,


[1] https://fedorahosted.org/shomyu/
[2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/bochecha


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list


Re: Updates lacking descriptions

2009-08-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 With you folks demanding more explicit changelogs you are rudestly
 pushing around package maintainers and force them to waste time to
 fullfill your solely burecratic demands.

 I just think they will keep doing the same...

 What else ? Filling bug report for every changelog not correctly
 formed ? That's not an option.
 And since we are a group of volunteers IMHO what should be done is
 advertised that it is advice to write down something which make sense
 and explain why it should be done and who uses it.
 You can't do anything else...

Being a group of volunteers doesn't mean we shouldn't aim for more quality.

If the update isn't worth at least giving a link to the changelog /
fixed bugs, is it worth pushing as an update?

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Epiphany effectively orphaned

2009-08-12 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no
 longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to
 an appropriate person / group.

Wouldn't that be to the current maintainer to say so?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-11 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

This was run against Rawhide right?

 bochecha:BADURL:adonthell-0.3.5.tar.gz:adonthell

Fixed in Rawhide (at least after the freeze is lifted).

 erikos:BADSOURCE:sugar-base-0.85.2.tar.bz2:sugar-base

This is a development release. As per the roadmap, 0.85.3 should be
out pretty soon [1].

I'll just let this one like this, it will be fixed by the end of
August when one of us updates the package.


Thanks for the reminder, that's a great help in keeping the Fedora
repositories a bit saner! :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: enigmail for F-11's thunderbird ?

2009-08-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Actually, why does rpmfusion-free even exist?  A cheeky question,
 admittedly, but I'm honestly curious.

AFAIK, it's because there are some free software that are not
acceptable in Fedora.

A free implementation of a patented codec comes to mind.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy

2009-08-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:42, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:

 What is the goal of the default Fedora PolicyKit policy system-wide, and
 how can we check that PolicyKit mechanisms' default policies are
 adhering to it?

 Generally where I'd like to move to is where the RPM package defaults
 are appropriate for a shared computer lab PC, and the desktop spin
 kickstart modifies things as appropriate for the unmanaged home
 PC/laptop.

I'm confused, does this mean that the desktop spin doesn't (or won't)
use the RPM package defaults?

If so, what about someone who install a « shared computer lab PC »
using the desktop spin? After all, users of this « shared lab PC »
need a desktop, so the admin could think the desktop spin is the most
appropriate...

That seems confusing, and potentially misguiding :-/

Or did I simply not understand what you meant?

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.

2009-08-08 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:06, Matěj Ceplmc...@redhat.com wrote:
 Adam Miller maxamill...@gmail.com writes:

 Today in our F12Alpha Blocker meeting we discussed the status of the
 Firefox SELinux bug.

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512845

 And we were hoping to get in contact with caillon, stransky, jhorak
 for more information on the bug as well as send this to the developer
 list in order to get any outside feedback that others might have on
 the topic of this being a F12Alpha Blocker.

 It is taken care of. Don't worry about it.

I had made a comment in this bug, asking about a similar bug in
Epiphany that SEAlert had reported to be the exact same one, but AIUI
Epiphany doesn't depend on Gecko anymore but on WebKit-GTK.

I can't see if someone had answered me, as the bug is now private, for
security concerns I guess.

If you stil have acces to it, could you tell me if I was answered ? Or
even better, could you answer me ? :)

I just wanted to know if I should open a new bug report for Epiphany
as SEAlert got confused or if it is indeed the same bug, in which case
I'll be patient.

Best regards,

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: F-11: system-config-printer -- windows printer -- You are not authorized to carry out the requested action

2009-08-08 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 The printer is attached to a windows box. At the time of running 
 system-config-printer,
 the windows box is on.

 This used to work just fine on F-10 and earlier...

I think s-c-p now uses PolicyKit.

As such, run it as your normal user, you'll be prompted for the root
password just when you need the authorization, removing the need to
run a whole graphical application as root.

 I wouldn't have a clue about the windows end.
 Your best bet is probably the list url I gave.
 Where more users, In a similar situation. would be active.

I also think this would be much better on the users list.

Best regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: More Fedora mock breakage

2009-07-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by exim-4.69-12.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by crontabs-1.10-31.fc12.noarch
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by logrotate-3.7.8-3.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by tar-2:1.22-6.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by openldap-2.4.16-2.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by ncurses-libs-5.7-3.20090207.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by grep-2.5.3-5.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by ncurses-base-5.7-3.20090207.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by gdbm-1.8.0-33.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by xz-4.999.8-0.8.beta.fc12.x86_64
 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by ustr-1.0.4-9.fc12.x86_64
 ...

 while trying to build rawhide packages under mock.  Host is a fully
 up2date Fedora 10 x86_64 system, selected mock config is
 fedora-rawhide-x86_64.

I had the same on F11, building in a Rawhide mock.

I was advised to update rpm to 4.7.1 that was in updates-testing,
which fixed the problem.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Updated Anaconda packages

2009-07-27 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 OK, in which package can I find your mkimage script.

revisor ? livecd-tools ? pungi ?

Just pick the one you prefer :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fit and Finish test day: batteries and suspend

2009-07-17 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Do you feel like writing up a use case involving a UPS ?


 As Adam stated in his reply, there is really nothing we can do since UPS
 devices are not supported at all.

 I haven't gotten around to bug hunting, but is there a bug for UPS
 support in DeviceKit? Anything?

From today's update in Fedora 11:
$ rpm -q --changelog DeviceKit-power | head
* lun. juil. 06 2009 Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com - 009-1
- Update to 009
- Fixes many problems with multi-battery laptops
- Use pm-powersave like HAL used to
- Fix detecting UPS devices
- Add support for recalled laptop batteries

Notice the line about UPS.

Now, I have no idea if that means proper support or not, but it seems
like it is coming :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Fedora on Netbooks (Was: Re: Reminder: Meeting in 24 hours, #fedora-meeting)

2009-07-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 The last event that I attended, I got a bunch of questions regarding Fedora
 usage on various netbooks.

 I believe that this is a marketing problem more than it is an engineering
 problem, because we have a variety of Fedora spins (including the default
 one) that would work fine on Netbooks.

 I think we need a simple page -- /wiki/Netbooks -- that offers some best
 practices/tips/troubleshooting/etc. for people who are using Fedora on
 different Netbooks.

I also had a lot of these questions at LSM. It turned out people were
more looking for a spin dedicated to netbooks (see UNR), they didn't
really want to know that Gnome runs perfectly fine with a small
display.

Last time I checked, we didn't have such a dedicated desktop
environment in our repositories, did I miss something ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: $HOME/bin

2009-07-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not
 mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that
 by default?

    Stefan
 Hi,

 because most people don't need it?

True.

Look at your /etc/profile (or ~/.bash_profile, I don't remember).

There should be something like:
[ -d ~/bin ]  PATH=~/bin:$PATH

Which means that the folder will be added to your PATH if it exists.

I'm on Windows XP right now, so I can't verify it, but iirc there's
something like that.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Better ways to format USB disks (file fomats etc)

2009-07-05 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Maybe I should clarify my use case experience. After I used GParted to
 format the HDD to ext3 (and ext4 later) I tried to create a folder on
 the HDD. I could not do this as a normal user, only as root.

You can create files/folders with users if they « own » the HDD. But
then, another user won't be able to do so.

I tried to do what you want some time ago, but all I could find was to
create several user owned directories on the HDD, then each user could
write in his folder.

If there's a way to have the « FAT behavior », I'd like to know it as
much as you :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Better ways to format USB disks (file fomats etc)

2009-07-05 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Create a top-level folder on the USB drive that's owned by your userid, then
 you can create any subfolders that your heart desires.


 This is totally broken if the disk is used on multiple computers.
 Having to maintain same UID-username combinations on the different
 computers is just not good usability.

At least, on all Fedora desktop, the first created user has the same
UID (501) right ? And as most desktops are single user anyway, this is
less trouble than it would seem.

However, fun starts when you plug your HDD in a cyber-café or another
multi-user desktop environment :)

 The way I'd like it to work is that all the files would appear to be
 owned by the user who mounted the disk, regardless of what was stored
 in the filesystem metadata. The rwx permission bits could well be
 applied as usual.

That sure would be great.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: rawhide report: 20090702 changes

2009-07-02 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Does this look ok?

 --- comps-f12.xml.in.orig       2009-07-02 15:39:02.0 +0530
 +++ comps-f12.xml.in    2009-07-02 19:49:32.108616562 +0530
 @@ -520,6 +520,17 @@
     /packagelist
   /group
   group
 +    idbooks/id
 +    _nameTechnical Books/_name
 +    _description/
 +    defaultfalse/default
 +    uservisibletrue/uservisible
 +    packagelist
 +      packagereq type=defaultdiveintopython/packagereq
 +      packagereq type=defaultldd-pdf/packagereq
 +    /packagelist
 +  /group
 +  group
     idbuildsys-build/id
     _nameBuildsystem building group/_name
     _description/

What if we start including non-technical books (like educational
material for the OLPC) ?

If the group name is Technical books, so should be the group id
don't you think ?

Might be bikeshedding, but if we can avoid closing some doors...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: FESCo meeting summary for 2009-06-26

2009-06-28 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Rahul, I question the point of ... making laundry lists of pros, cons, bugs
 of desktop X vs Y...  I'm sure folks can come up with a similar list of
 gnome (or other) related negative items, or kde-only features too but I
 question it's constructiveness.

 My only comments here:

 1.  The desktop spin *is* gnome for cryin out loud.  Seriously, common sense
 is just screaming in my head to call a spade a spade.

 2.  A bigger question to me is what does it mean to be the default
 desktop.  All this it's the default because... comments make me wonder if
 folks are just grasping for reasons to justify the status quo.  Where or how
 is this documented anywhere?  If it isn't, shouldn't it be?

We have a Desktop team. So IMHO the default desktop is what they
decide it to be.

They are currently focused only on Gnome. If they were focused on KDE,
then the default desktop would be KDE. To change that, it would take
some KDE contributors to join the Desktop team.

When both are as well represented in the Desktop team, then the
default desktop might be both of them. If KDE becomes more represented
in the Desktop team, then it might become the one default desktop.

To me, it's only a matter of who does the work. Would you complain
that most of our webapps use TurboGears instead of Tomcat ? No, simply
becasue that's what those who do the work (the Infrastructure team)
decided to use. That's the same for the Desktop team.

It doesn't take any policy to change this fact. It takes people
willing to do the job where it needs to happen, in the right team.

Just my thoughts anyway...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT

2009-06-19 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 But how can i modify the source ,
 For example think i just added a printf(HARSHA); in wpa_supplicant/main.c
 main () function,
 How do i compile it..
 How do i install my compiled executable!
 so that in wpa_supplicant.log i can see the text HARSHA,

That's not specific to wpa_supplicant.

Just rebuild the srpm with your own tarball, and install the resulting rpm.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: What I HATE about F11

2009-06-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Ubuntu has an admin group, and users in that group can use sudo due
 to this line in sudoers:

 %admin ALL=(ALL) ALL

 I might suggest this as a feature unless anyone else wants to (or
 thinks I shouldn't) ?

# grep -n wheel /etc/sudoers
81:## Allows people in group wheel to run all commands
82:# %wheel ALL=(ALL)   ALL
85:# %wheel ALL=(ALL)   NOPASSWD: ALL

All you have to do is uncomment one line ;)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: What I HATE about F11

2009-06-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 The way it is done right now, you have a system that might give too
 few permissions to some users. If that causes a problem, you'll notice
 it, and you can correct it in a very simple way (uncomment one line
 and add a user to a group).

 However, if we change the default, you have a system that may be
 giving too much permissions to some users depending on your taste. And
 the worse part is that you (as an admin) might not even know it !

 Bikeshed!

 Must be some weird stuff smoking admin who simply adds someone to the
 wheel group not knowing what that group was for!

 The purpose of the wheel group has always been to be used for more
 privileged users.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_%28Unix_term%29
 http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/W/wheel.html

Did I say the contrary ? I don't think so, but being a non-native
english speaker, I might have said something I didn't want to :)

I didn't say the wheel group was a nonsense or a problem. I was
responding to Richard who wanted the line to be uncommented (harmless
per se) AND the first user to be added to the wheel group by default.

Having the admin's user in the wheel group to be able to use sudo for
administrative tasks is a great idea. I just don't think it should be
added by default, without an explicit consent of the admin.

For example, a « add to the wheel group » checkbox in
system-config-users and firstboot could be great. Not sure it would be
a good idea to have it checked and hidden by default.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Strange /etc/fedora-release and smolt help

2009-06-12 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I'm trying to figure out whats going on here so I'm off to the list.

 Smolts.org is reporting people checking in with both:

 Fedora 11 Leonidas

 and

 Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)

 Can anyone with F11 installed look at what is in their /etc/fedora-release
 and tell me which one you have, and how you installed?  Also what version
 of fedora-release you have.


$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)

# smoltSendProfile
UUID: 8e71bd57-f8f2-4793-b68b-99bfee6f3aa2
SE: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
...

# rpm -q fedora-release
fedora-release-11-1.noarch

I installed it from Snapshot live CD, then updated.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Hands-on: new Fedora release goes up to 11 but doesn't rock

2009-06-12 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I too agree.

 Sorry to say but still it works like a beta release for me!!

 There are lot of things need to be addressed.

I suppose you reported the bugs before Fedora 11 was released, so that
the issues could have a chance to be fixed in time ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Hands-on: new Fedora release goes up to 11 but doesn't rock

2009-06-12 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 It wouldn't be too dificult to release an updated iso with the appropriate 
 patches would it?

That's what Fedora Unity does with their respins.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-09 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 How could we document that when in doubt, clicking through to the full
 review guidelines should be done?

After each item in the review guidelines, add a [more] link that
points to the relevant section in the packaging guidelines ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: rpms/polkit-gnome/devel polkit-gnome.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-06-09 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 MB After each item in the review guidelines, add a [more] link that
 MB points to the relevant section in the packaging guidelines ?

 Do you realize that the document already has footnotes doing exactly
 that?

Wow !

Looks like I was not entirely awake when I looked at them, I missed
the footnotes (and I wonder how, it's not like they are hidden :-/)

Sorry about that...

Note for self: stop drinking before you look at a page and say something dumb ^^


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 11 and Ext4: The Straight Bits

2009-06-08 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I don't mean to meddle here, but didn't Ubuntu have ext4 with their Jaunty
 Jackalope release?

Fedora 11 will not be the first to include ext4. Fedora 11 will be the
first to *have it by default*.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-04 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 You are still presuming your users to be interested in developing and
 working on your package.

 This simply does not apply - They want to use your package.

 I see 2 possibilities:
 * either the user wants his/her bug fixed, in that case he/she is
 responsible for reporting it to the appropriate place,
 * or the user does not care about having the bug fixed, that's fine with me,
 we can just close it, less work for me. ;-) If somebody actually cares,
 he/she'll report it upstream. If nobody cares, why bother fixing it?

And why can't this somebody be the package maintainer ?

I mean, a package maintainer should care about the software he
packages, otherwise, why is he packaging it ? :-/


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Packager = Programmer?

2009-06-04 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I wish I knew how to organize some optional program language specific
 skills development sessions aimed at packagers that made sense..but I
 don't.  Nothing like a cert or anything like that, but to introduce
 packagers and potential packagers to languages just as a good skills
 building exercise.

More than learning development skills for the language you package, it
would be great to introduce stuff like how software is build /
installed.

I'd love to learn how autotools, setuptools, and other equivalents for
other languages work. Not necessarily because I want to build a
project using those, but because I sometimes have a hard time figuring
out how to patch a Makefile in one of my packages, why I should patch
a .in or .am file,...

Actually, those would be great ideas for Fedora Classrooms I guess.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

2009-06-03 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I agree. Demanding them to take any responsibility
 on that report, even testing it again makes them just
 think twice next time to report anything.
 [snip]
 Exactly. If the reporter wants to take part to that
 communication, good. But that should not expected.

 More reports is better than more active reporters, those
 latter ones wont disapper anywhere anyway.

 The reporter is the one who wants the bug fixed, it's them asking us to do
 something, they need to do their part. If you aren't willing to do anything
 to help us fix your bug, you'll just have to live with it forever.

So as a package maintainer, you don't want a bug in a software you
maintain to be fixed ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: RPM Soft dependencies (Was: Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting)

2009-05-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 users may not want those features. A soft dependency covers this
 situation pretty perfectly; by default you get the extra dependencies
 installed so the features will be available, but if you're someone who
 needs to optimize disk space or number of installed packages you'll have
 configured urpmi not to install soft dependencies so you won't get them,
 and if you didn't do that but you later decide to remove one of the soft
 deps, you can. I consider this a significant win, the package would be
 objectively less good without this.

How do you know _later_ which installed packages could be removed as
they only came via soft dependencies ?

« package-cleanup --soft-leaves » or something like that ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: RPM Soft dependencies (Was: Re: Agenda for the 2009-05-26 Packaging Committee meeting)

2009-05-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Then you use « package-cleanup --leaves ».

 This will list the packages that were dragged in as dependencies but
 on which nothing depend anymore.

 s/that were dragged in as dependencies but//.  I don't think package-cleanup
 currently has any idea/cares why something was installed.

No, my sentence was confusing.

« package-cleanup --leaves » will tell you what installed packages are
no longer required by any other on your system.

Of course, it can't know why you installed them or even if something
outside of its scope (e.g. a program you compiled manually) still
needs one of those.

I shouldn't have spoken about the intent of the user, you're right. :)

To be more correct, « --leaves » will list packages on which no others
depend AND that match the defined « leaf_regex ». A quick look at the
source seems to indicate that returned packages will be mostly
libraries, as the default leaf_regex appears to be
(^(compat-)?lib.+|.*libs?[\d-]*$).


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

2009-05-29 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 If you're going to maintain a spin for a like-minded community (like
 ojuba.org is)

 have you took a look to the proposal ? 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InappropriateContents
 where does it mention anything about the alike-minded community of
 fanatic government censorship agents in ojuba.org ?

I think what he meant was a community who think alike, i.e. who have
the same moral values (which seems to be the case for ojuba.org), not
judging the righteousness of those values.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

2009-05-29 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 it's a wiki page, if the packager was unwilling to put such
 classification then he have no right to stop the reviewer from editing
 the wiki page and if they both where unwilling to do so, they both
 have no right from stopping the first offended user from editing the
 wiki page, that's all.
 so I can't see  when it can cause a package to be rejected.

You do realize that it's probably what is going to happen the most
often: neither the packager nor the reviewer will care and add the
package to the wiki page.

Sure, maybe we'll try to be educated and add our packages to the wiki
page in the beginning. But after some time, if it's not enforced, we
(those who do not care) will just forget it.

So I'm afraid that in the end, you (and those who care) will be the
ones maintaining such a list.

Now if that's what you want, others said it before: just do it, no one
will stop you.

Create the wiki page with a note about the fact that there might be
false positives and that this is not mandatory to enter the Fedora
repositories, add the few packages you know might be offensive to some
people, and advertise the page here, closing this discussion in the
same time :)

Those who care will help you, those who don't will continue not caring
or maybe try to discipline themselves and add their potentially
offensive packages to the list.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

2009-05-29 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 21:52, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
 So I'm afraid that in the end, you (and those who care) will be the ones 
 maintaining such a list.

 NP, how about calling that wiki page InappropriatePackagesAdvisory ?

Don't tie words together, separate them with spaces (MediaWiki will
transform them in underscores).

This will ease the searching.

Also, those packages are not inappropriate. They _might be_. Try to
keep this nuance in the name of the page, this will avoid some people
to be pissed (well, some others will always be :).

The rest is just common sense, name it the way you want.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

2009-05-28 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I've got no problem with it. Unlike hot-babe there's nothing even
 remotely resembling depiction here.

 It's essentially a download tool a la aria2/d4x/gwget with a particular
 focus/niche and in my opinion fairly innocuous. The author is pretty
 up-front about what it is and what it's for - if that's reflected in
 the %description then the odds on it being installed accidentally
 would be fairly low.

And it looks like we have a precedent...
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/p0rn-comfort


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: List of packages including country flags

2009-05-25 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
2009/5/25 Björn Persson :
 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
 A two year old (through kindergartener or first grader) is certainly
 capable of choosing a symbol that they've been taught to use from a
 table of other symbols.  The real question is whether there's a time in
 a child's development when they can pick out an image that gets them
 into a program but can't pick out a two letter abbreviation to do the same.

 It's not really about getting into the program but rather configuring the
 program. Gcompris uses the locale from the environment by default, like all
 well-behaved programs do, but you can go to the configuration screen and
 choose another locale if you want to. Then you need to exit Gcompris and
 start it again before the change takes effect on the whole program, so I
 doubt that the intention is that children should choose their locale every
 time they start Gcompris.

 I haven't quite figured out why the developers felt a need to have a separate
 locale setting just for Gcompris, but in those cases where it's needed I
 think a parent or teacher will configure the program and then tell the
 children not to touch the settings.

Remember this is a learning software.

You can have your system configured for french and let your child both
play sometimes in french and otherwise learn english with GCompris.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Why would I want Fedora?

2009-05-15 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 17:01,  va...@valikszekely.com wrote:
 While I sit here viewing everyones' responses to this subject about Fedora's 
 description, I have only few reasons to see the it would not be an 
 alternative to said proprietary operating systems.  Thus far since the 
 eariest stages of GUI driven Linux;  only gamers, flash developers and like 
 would not see the os as becoming a strong alternative os meaning without 
 emulation.

When one says that Fedora is not an alternative to Windows, it doesn't
mean that Fedora is inferior, and thus not yet a suitable alternative.

What we mean is that Fedora doesn't aim to be an alternative to
Windows. Instead, Fedora has clear goals.

If anything, Fedora would be aiming to make Windows an alternative to Linux ;)

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] emc2 license

2009-05-14 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

Need a french speaker ?

 The COPYRIGHT file, however, is in French:
  http://www-c.inria.fr/gamma/cdrom/www/emc2/copyright.htm

 There seems to be some sort of commercial utilization clause, but my
 French is too limited to comprehend its scope.

Here is a rough translation. Beware, I am not a lawyer, I certainly
didn't use the most appropriate legal terms, etc...

-
COPYRIGHT emc2.

Software EMC2 (c) INRIA 1998 version 2.06c from october 1998,
referenced to as  the  SOFTWARE below.

The SOFTWARE was conceived and developed by :Frédéric Hecht and Eric
Saltel, researchers in the Menusin and Modulef projects at the
National Institute of Research in Computing and Automating (INRIA) -
Domaine de Voluceau - Rocquencourt - 78153 Le Chesnay Cedex.

INRIA holds all property rights on the SOFTWARE.

Preamble:

The SOFTWARE is under development and INRIA wants it to be used by the
scientific comunity so that it gets tested, evaluated and so that it
can evolve.

To that purpose, INRIA decided to distribute the source code of the
prototype of the SOFTWARE by FTP.

a) Scope of the rights conceded by INRIA to the user of the SOFTWARE

INRIA graciously grants the right to reproduce, use, distribute,
modify the software as part of non commercial experimentations, as
well as the right to experiment, in integration purpose, the software
in another program.

b) Reproduction of the SOFTWARE

* Articles 9 and 10 of the Berne Convention for the protection of
literary and artistic works, respectively in their paragraphs 2 and 3,
authorizing reproduction and quotation of intellectual works, only in
the conditions:
* provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal
exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the
legitimate interests of the author.
* Where use is made of works in accordance with the preceding
paragraphs of this Article, mention shall be made of the source, and
of the name of the author if it appears thereon., any usage or
reproduction of the softwares and/or documents that are the exclusive
property of INRIA in a non-profit goal or to a commercial purpose is
bound to previous agreement from INRIA.

Any commercial usage made without previous consent from INRIA would
then be a counterfeiting offense.

c) Information feedback

Any user of the SOFTWARE will give feedback on usage of the SOFTWARE
to INRIA (email: Frédéric Hecht).

d) Warranties :

It is reminded that the SOFTWARE is a research product under development.

INRIA could not ensure any responsibility and would not in any case be
held liable to repair any direct or indirect damage suffered by the
user.


Frédéric Hecht

Last modified: Thu May 19 1998
-

Note that the 2 mentioned articles from the Berne Convention are not
my translation, they are the real paragraphs. I picked them here:
http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/trtdocs_wo001.html

Hope that can be useful.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: [Fwd: [Lf-announce] Announcing the New Linux.com]

2009-05-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 20:07, Jack Aboutboul j...@redhat.com wrote:
 I just wanted to pass this on so everyone is informed about it.  They are
 trying to start a social network.  What do you guys think about it?

Well, just like any social network, I'll pass on this one ^_^

However, there are few issues in my humble opinion:
- support appears to me much more efficient on a per distribution /
per language forum
- the rank system will inevitably lead to some race, people speaking a
looot and not necessarily providing valuable help
- geeks already tend to be marginalized, as we can appear « weird » to
some people. This is a social network for geeks, and I'm not sure this
will help us show that Linux is not only for geeks / nerds with a
beard that spend their nights coding in their basement.
- « a dream laptop signed by Linus Torvalds » Are we some fanboys ? o_O

« ZOMG !!!1!11!! I has lapt0p signed by Linus oneleven!! »

Anyway, I wish them the best of luck and certainly don't want to blame
them for trying something :)

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Slogan, redux

2009-04-23 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Let it ROAR

That's actually nice !

Is « roar » an action verb in english ?

If so, it could be nice to use it as the main verb of the sentance,
something like « Roar with pleasure » (but with something other than «
pleasure », it's a Linux distribution, not an orgasm, even though some
might have weird sexual perversions :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Changing « Preferred Family » value

2009-03-18 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi !

I've just been assigned a bug report on a font package I maintain in Fedora [1].

From my understanding, the bug is in the TTF file itself.

I'm not very familiar with fonts (I took over this package as it was
orphaned and needed by the fedora-olpc effort), so I don't really know
how I should proceed to fix it.

Is there a way for me to patch the TTF file ? Does this belong
upstream, so I should report it to the font developer ?

Any hint would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Openstreetmap moving to Open Database License (ODbL)

2009-03-05 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Therefore I'd like to know if this license would permit to include
 Openstreetmap contents (e.g. maps) in the Fedora Project or if it has
 some problems.

 Looking at the Factual Information License, I've got some concerns. I
 asked Red Hat Legal to take a look at it, and this was their reply:

[snip]

 (RH Legal is still looking at the ODBL, they should have comments on
 that later, which I will pass along).

Thank you Andrea for bringing this issue here, and thank you Tom for
looking at it.

I'm currently developing shomyu (which might eventually get its way
into Fedora one day) and it uses OSM data, so I'm really concerned
about this licensing change.

/me blesses the day he decided to join this list

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

___
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list


Re: 4 foundations

2009-02-09 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
2009/2/9 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
 On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:01:27PM +0100, Max Spevack wrote:
 I'm writing my FOSDEM trip report, and I wanted to link to a page that
 specifically explains Fedora's 4 foundations.  Does one exist that I
 don't know about?  If not, I think one should be created.

 Good point; I started it here:

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations

 I'd appreciate some help putting that page together -- it should
 include the beautiful graphics Mairin Duffy made on behalf of the
 Design team.

And maybe the excellent articles from David Nalley ?
http://www.nalley.sc/david/?p=55
http://www.nalley.sc/david/?p=59
http://www.nalley.sc/david/?p=73
http://www.nalley.sc/david/?p=75


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Fwd: Introduction

2009-01-29 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Sorry, the message was sent only to Nicolas instead of the whole list.

Gmail is killing me -_-


-- Forwarded message --
From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: Introduction
To: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net


 I found the Fonts SIG over the excellent fedora classroom session
 provided by Nicolas and now want to help you

 Welcome on board. We have a mix of experienced and new packagers in
 the group, so don't hesitate to always ask for help there or on irc if
 you have questions. (if asking publicly is too intimidating you can
 always form a private cabal with other new packagers, it's sometimes
 easier to work with people at the same knowledge level).

And we even have some intermediate packagers who are totally ignorant
of how fonts work, but found themselves having to deal with fonts
packaging against their will (ok, maybe I'm a little exagerating :)

I don't have any problem with publicly asking for help, but I'd love
to join a cabal of new font packagers.

By the way, what was this IRC classroom about ? Did it deal with how
to package fonts and what-is-this-fontconfig-I'm-hearing-about ? If
yes, are the minutes available ? Is there another one planned ?

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: [Ambassadors] Fedora Brazil Magazine #4 released

2008-12-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi !

 Happy new year and do not forget to download the magazine in the link
 below:
 
 http://www.projetofedora.org/revista/RevistaFedoraBrasil004.pdf

Thanks for the link, reading it right now :)

However, something caught my attention:

* Apple patenteia Dock depois de quase 10 anos

Após nove anos, a Apple finalmente obteve o registro da patente da
chamada Dock, a barra de atalhos e tarefas presente em seu sistema
operacional, o Mac OS X. O registro foi pedido em 20 de dezembro de
1999.

Segundo o site MacNN, a patente abrange posicionamento de ícones e
cursores, além do efeito de ampliação obtido quando o mouse é passado
sobre um ícone. (...) Isso pode revelar-se uma má notícia para softwares
de terceiros inspirados na invenção, como os programas ObjectDock,
RocketDock e Avant Windows Navigator.


For those in here who don't understand portuguese, it means that Apple
patented the Dock. Moreover, the patent covers « positioning of icons
and cursors, as well as the zoom effect when the mouse moves over an
icon »

Is the legal team aware of this ? What's gonna happen about those
dock-like apps in the Fedora repositories, given the Fedora policy on
patented software ?

Of course, this mailing-list might not be the best place to talk about
it. Is there another communication medium for legal stuff ?

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: ZOMG STICKERS!!11 Proof

2008-11-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Does this look good? 

Definitely. They are awesome.

 If you see any errors or issues let me know and
 I'll have them fixed, otherwise I'd like to send to send them my
 approval ASAP.

I have only one remark. There's plenty of space on the left and on the
right. Couldn't this space be filleb by other stickers ?

 Thanks :)

Thanks goes to you. :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Developers vs Grandmas revisited

2008-10-27 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I think OpenOffice.org ought to be by default on the gnome live cd
because
 everyone I know use it.

I think Microsoft Office ought to be by default on each and every Fedora
liveCD because everyone I know use it...

The question is not what people want, but what Fedora wants to achieve. ;)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin



-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Developers vs Grandmas

2008-10-23 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 And I will make quite the opposite argument.  If you are a grandma,
 how are you to know that logging bugs will help your situation?  I
 think this is an opportunity for us as ambassadors to make inroads
 with our families and get them involved in the process.  Without
 average users providing perspective, how do we plan to make an
 operating system to accommodate their needs as well?

Mummy, when you have a problem with your computer, you go to this
website, you select the component that is in fault, the version of the OS,
the architecture, and then you specify your problem.

Now, if my mother ever manages to fill a bug report (what does arch mean
? How do I know which component is faulty ?), it will look like:
J'ai cliqué sur 'machin', ça marche pas.

Yes, my mother doesn't speak english. But that's no problem as the bug
zappers are great and will translate the report for the devs !

Here is what it means in english:
I clicked on 'stuff' and it doesn't work.

Yeah, grandma input will definitely be useful :-/

The problem here is that we want feedback from the most basic end-users
with the least knowledge possible, but we definitely don't have the tools
required for that (and I doubt it is even possible to create such tools
that would not require massive human interaction with the end-user).

Not an easy problem to solve...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Hints Tips suggestions

2008-10-22 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Hey all,

 I'm looking for suggestions of hints and tips that we could publish to
 Fedora Magazine?

- how are menus managed (.desktop files)
- using pkcon instead of yum
- switch backends of Totem (maybe only if totem-xine doesn't depend on
some stuff found in livna / RPMFusion)
- write your own plymouth graphical theme (I read it only means writing a
plugin, is it too complicated ?)
- Fedora hardening with SecTool (something basic, the tool is really
expressive)
- make a screencast with istanbul
- use your FAS account in ekiga

There might be lot's of other stuff too :)

We have a french blog translating Fedora Daily Package and providing
some Fedora week-endly hints. Their team is really small so they are
having a hard time writing something regularly, but I'm sure they have
lot's of ideas for content...

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora upgrades and LTS

2008-10-20 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
  This is still not
 anything for your grandma to attempt (and that is what it should be in
 the end) easy and clean! (a notification that appears, F10 is now out!
 upgrade system?) So this is something that an LTS version absolutely
 must have, new versions of software within a release and a smoth upgrade
 path. And smoth upgrades on a system that has additional software
 installed, not only a basic system setup.

 This type of notification would be a good thing, it's exactly what
 Ubuntu does.

http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/08/22/packagekit-03x-new-features/


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Solar poster not complete

2008-10-13 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

I'm currently organizing our release event in Paris, and I wanted to
translate the Solar poster for it.

I downloaded it from this page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar#Fedora_10_.28X.29_Release_Poster

However, it seems like the background image is missing. brejc81 on
#fedora-art told me to write here and ask for Sstorari to upload the
file Solar_sfondo_poster.png.

Could you do that ?

Thanks in advance,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Hello Guys!

 Read this bad news:

 http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1

 This is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
 within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
 Fedora LTS.

There is a Fedora LTS. It's called RHEL or CentOS.

 The brazilian government, one of the biggest Fedora Case of the world is
 changing from Fedora/ Red Hat to Ubuntu/Debian.

 We need to think and create a solution to give support by a long time or
 the fedora user will decrease!

Or maybe Fedora is not a suitable system for production use. Think about
it: updating all your servers (and in the case of Wikipedia there must be
hundreds) each year ?

Do you know what system the Fedora Infrastructure is using ? At least for
Fedora People, that's CentOS, not Fedora (and the contrary would be really
surprising).


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Andrea Modesto Rossi escreveu:
 I don't understand the problem...for LTS there is RHEL ;-)

 I Like this slogan:
 Fedora is the best of today, RHEL is the best of the following seven
 years.

 Best Regards,


 Ok. Put this message on the Fedora Official website.

 For me, it's a bad argument and a very bad marketing slogan for Fedora
 project!

Or maybe you didn't really understand the goal of the Fedora Project.

Once again, Fedora is not about conquering the desktop / server market.
It's about developping / building / creating / innovating / revolutionning
the future of the desktop / server FOSS products.

The Fedora distribution is simply a tool to test and build this future.

1. If we wanted to conquer the desktop, we would find a legal way to
provide mp3 and other codecs
2. If we wanted to conquer the server, we would have a LTS (which we had
in fact, but Fedora Legacy died because no one was needing it / willing to
maintain it)

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 SERPRO (Brazilian Government IT Department) has more than 9.000 desktops
 running Fedora (in all brazilian states) and now is migrating to Ubuntu,
 because is impossible to migrate every year to other Fedora Release.
 With the short time support is impossible to work and use Fedora.

If I have to be totally honest, being a hard Fedora advocate, I would
never inflict myself the pain of having to maitain 9000 Fedora systems. I
mean come on ! 9000 updates each year ! o_O

 - If you are a Geek, a student or developer, you can use Fedora
 otherwise, you have to use Centos or Red Hat EL.

I would rather say:
If you want to help us build the future of computing, doing it in a way
that preserve users freedoms, come and join the Fedora Community.

What's good about having lot's of Fedora users ? What do they bring ? What
we need are contributors, which is rather different.

And don't tell me that to have contributors you need users. I know at
least one Fedora contributor (who will soon become a Fedora Ambassador)
and whose system of choice is... Gentoo.

Fedora is not about conquering the market, it's about improving the whole
FOSS ecosystem. If we wanted to be simply better than others, we wouldn't
redistribute upstream all the great features we have at each release,
often 6 months before others.

 Sorry, but, for me it don't make sense! I can't work in a project in a
 cooperative way, contributing and cooperating with something that's not
 to be used in a serious way.

Fedora can be used in a serious way, I mean, on this list, most of us (and
maybe all of us) are actually using it in a serious way.


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) escreveu:
 Hello Guys!
 Read this bad news:
 http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1474805050;fp;16;fpid;1 This
is happening frequently. I think we will have to revise some things
 within the project, particularly the creation of a Legacy project or a
Fedora LTS.
 There is a Fedora LTS. It's called RHEL or CentOS.

 So, we are working here to recommend Red Hat and CENTOS ??

 That's the question, Ubuntu has a LTS, Fedora don't! That's the main
problem of the Fedora Project.

And Ubuntu wants to take over the desktop / server market. Fedora doesn't.

And Ubuntu is trying to make profit. Fedora isn't.

And we could go on playing find the differencies for a long time ;)

 Today, we have many users! With this idea to recommend Centos and Red
Hat, we will have a lot of users in the future ?

 Thinking in this way, we will hear frequently Fedora is a beta tester
version to add and improve technologies for Red Hat EL .

Fedora is a lab, trying to push forward the latest and greatest free and
open source technologies (not RHEL, but all upstream and downstream). How
can you move fast if you have to maintain releases for a long time ?

 For me and for marketing, it isn't a great decision!

 Now i'm presenting lectures in all Brazilian states and i can't talk
about this.. USE CENTOS OR RHEL. I have to recommend Fedora.

 I'm here to represent and spread fedora, not Centos or Red hat EL.

So am I. But selling the wrong tool for a use case will only make bad
publicity for this tool, even if it's great in other use cases.



--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin



-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora

2008-10-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Reopen the Legacy project would be great!

 But, we need to use the same infra and repositories of Fedora Project.

That's the problem IMHO.

 If the Legacy project will be a official project i can work HARD to
 recruit people to work in LATAM.

 So, that's is the question. Can we maintain Fedora releases by more 1
 year officially, using the official mirrors and repos  ?

 The fedora Board has a position about this ?

I think they have: a Fedora release is maintained only one year (but you
might want to ask them on their ML ;)

The Fedora Legacy was a community initiative, it was not an official one
by the Fedora Project, just like Fedora Unity is iirc.

Regards,

PS: could you stop replying to people CCing the mailing list and reply
directly (and only) to the mailing list ?


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora Remix etymology

2008-10-03 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 I missed this thread yesterday due to being on a plane, but that RHM
 article is exactly what I was going to point to for the purposes of
 establishing a date of the remix phrase being used.

 And yes, I do remember when Jack left me a voice mail that said dude,
 Fedora 7 needs to be all about the remix.  :)

I'm not sure I understood very well, but is this thread about knowing who
between Ubuntu and Fedora is the first one who used the term remix ?

If it's not, maybe I should read it more carefully, but if it is, how
could that matter ? o_O

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Getting out the vote for the Fedora 10 election season

2008-10-01 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 As a start is there a general need to raise the awareness of the
 election and voting process we are using?
 Can we generate general interest material covering topics like:
 Why vote? How do you qualify for voting? What's this range voting stuff?

From out in the field I hear several reasons people don't vote. One
 common reason is that they are new to the project and don't feel they
 know enough about who everyone is and what the various committees do
 to feel competent to participate.

That's exactly the reason why I didn't vote for the first election I was
allowed to : the latest Fedora Board election.

 So one thing that I think would help new contributors get their
 bearings, and not just with respect to elections, is something like an
 organization chart that explains the structure of the Fedora project
 generally. What are all these committees? What purpose do they serve?
 What problems do the solve? Knowing that much will suggest a reason to
 care to many people I think.

That would not really have helped me (and people in my case). My issue was
that I knew absolutely nothing about the candidates. How could I vote for
one or another ?

The answer came from Yaakov Neemoy after some beers: if I don't know who
to vote for, I should just give the same score to everyone. That will have
the exact same result, except it will show that I care enough about Fedora
to actually take the time to do it.

This possibility, as evident as it might seem, was totally unclear to me,
and I don't think I'm the only one. It might be worth adding that in the
voting page I guess.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Getting out the vote for the Fedora 10 election season

2008-10-01 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 That would
 not really have helped me (and people in my case). My issue was
 that I knew absolutely nothing about the candidates. How could I vote
 for
 one or another ?


 If given an opportunity and encouraged to ask questions of all the
 candidates.. would you take it? Would you write a question? Would you
 read the answer to other people's questions?

Absolutely !

In fact, I read each one's description, but hey, they were all of equal
quality to me, and I didn't have the background of each one to make a
better opinion.

A public ask your candidate what you want to session would be great too.
We could have each candidate, one after each other, answer questions from
potential voters on IRC. That might even be more effective than some
written questions submitted to each candidate as:

1. one question from someone often leads to another one from someone else
who might not have thought about asking it if it were not for the previous
one
2. when you don't see your question in the ones that were chosen to be
asked, you are always tempted to think that it was censored

Of course, those meetings should be recorded and logged somewhere so that
people who could not attend can read them (summarized maybe ?).

Anyway, as I said, I *wanted* to vote, but just didn't know who to vote
for. Yaakov only came too late with his idea...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Opening Red Hat Magazine

2008-09-25 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 If we decided to open up Red Hat Magazine, so that members of the Fedora
 community were part of the editorial board, responsible for identifying
 and
 producing great Fedora content for a broad audience, and using the Red
 Hat
 Magazine voice directly -- would that be of interest to people here?

 I'm talking about running RHM completely transparently.  Open editorial
 meetings, an open publication calendar, etc., etc.  Would you be
 interested
 in participating in such a project?

 My main worry is brand marketing. When I think of Red Hat Magazine, I
 expect items/content written/produced for the Red Hat products: RHEL,
 RHN, RHCE, RH-DS, RH-IPA, etc. [Even though that has not been the
 general trend of the magazine.] I don't think Fedora as at least in my
 brain I keep them as separate entities. A Fedora Magazine I would
 expect items on Fedora Linux, Spacewalk, FreeIPA, Fedora-DS, Dogtags,
 etc..

 Does that make sense to others? What would be the end product and what
 'marketing brand' would it mostly embracing?

Definitely.

I'd rather see a Fedora Magazine too. It can use the same infrastructure,
but make it as independant as possible to the eyes of readers (ie: not a
*.redhat.com URL, Fedora look and feel, ...).

We should try to separate the two brands. Of course RedHat is liable for
Fedora, but if we use the RHM, we'll be seen as a RedHat product (which we
don't want right ?).

The recent incident already hurt the independance of the Fedora
Community. Let's not perpetuate this situation.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Distributor Spin

2008-09-16 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 It will look like fedora in most of cases except when the maker

If you are making a spin, then you are the maker.

If you want to provide an app for everyone to create its own spin, you're
too late, Revisor is already there (and you should contribute to it :)

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: press kit

2008-09-06 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 I had a short look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Press and
 I
 miss a press-kit, a lets say press information document, a short doc
 where all necessary things a journalist needs to know about fedora is
 presented.
 Is there a need for it? If yes, I would be glad to write one.

I'd say that even if there is no need for it, everyone would be glad if
you could write one :)


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: CD/DVD Distributors

2008-08-31 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
  They enjoy their presence on the list at the pleasure of the FPL or
  other Ambassadors/Marketing leadership.
  
  If they are misbehaving, just remove them.  IMHO, no need for a
  committee discussion on this item.
 
 Agreed,
 but would be nice to know if it was a scratched cd, or fraud.
 How it affects Fedora overall?
 
I agree to this idea.

Like Max said, there's no need to ask a committee if we can remove them.
But when removing, we should notify someone somewhere at least for
traceability.

A bit like what I could see from the last weeks I spent in #fedora-ops

When an op wants to ban someone, he does. And he notifies others ops in
#fedora-ops. This way, we all know that person A was banned, why he was,
if we should also ban him from other chans, etc... We can then discuss
the decision if we want, but there's no need to.

Something like that could be good for distributors too. For example, if
a distributor comes to complain to me to discuss his removal, I have all
infos to explain him the decision of his removal.

Regards,


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

2008-07-21 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

 I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and
 events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you
 need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own
 profile.
Once again ? o_O

I don't know those online apps at all, but is it that hard to tell them
not to send an invitation message to all your contacts ?

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

2008-07-21 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Here is a question for all you Eee (and compatibles) users: how about
 the wallpaper size?

 In F9 we added 800x480 as a resolution for which we provide a desktop
 wallpaper (this is the screen size for Eee PC 701).

 However, the new generation (from all vendors), launched/will launch
 this summer models with larger display, 8.9-10, with a resolution of
 1024x600px.
 We try to keep the package size small, so I think it make sense to
 include only one wallpaper for ultraportables (we have only a few sized
 vor various aspect ratios, all the others are scaled down) and it should
 be 1024x600 (those with 7 displays will show a resized version, it is
 better in such cases to scale down than to scale up).

 It is OK to sacrifice (a bit to strong said) the 701 series, which is
 not the coolest thing any more (and it has a slightly different aspect
 ratio)?

I've always wondered why we don't use SVG wallpapers... Is it too much
resources consuming to redraw the wallpaper ?

On the other hand, those tiny-ultra-mini-extra-small-portable are not
racing horses, and they are more (at least to me) some kind of super
electronic note-books (I'm speaking about a real paper note-book, not
about a laptop). So maybe they don't need the animated wallpaper and a
static version could be provided.

Maybe the best track would be to split the package. This would take the
same space on the media as all wallpapers should be included if we don't
want soemone to have a plain blue background, but at least, yum installs /
updates would not download the whole big almighty package...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

2008-07-21 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Maybe the best track would be to split the package. This would take the
 same space on the media as all wallpapers should be included if we don't
 want soemone to have a plain blue background, but at least, yum installs
 /
 updates would not download the whole big almighty package...

 Sometime the space on media is a problem (think about the LiveCD) and
 even the space on your hdd may be a problem (think at first gen Eee PC
 701, with 2-4GB of storage).

 And I think we want the default look and feel everywhere, this is our
 identity. But a spin (say a spin for ultraportables) can have (if I
 understood correctly) a different default (maybe a non-animated, small
 resolution version of the default wallpaper).

That's exactly why I was suggesting to split the current package, so that
each spin could have its own wallpaper. And on the DVD, I don't think we
are currently running out of space...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Red Hat Replaces RHGB With Plymouth

2008-07-11 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Will we see plymouth in Fedora 10 or is it too early?

 Ok, I found it:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBetterStartup

Jeremy Katz spoke about it on his live journal:
http://katzj.livejournal.com/432195.html

He also provided a screencast here:
http://katzj.livejournal.com/432586.html

Looks really nice :)

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin



-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Using multimedia as a resource to promote Fedora

2008-07-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 I also don't know how we are going to ever be able to provide embedded
 video in a way that makes sense on our main site.Flash doesn't
 support ogg yet, so we can't easily generate a flash video that works
 for our userbase.  And for people outside our userbase, I'm not sure
 there is a way to embed theora into a page and have it work for
 people.  Is there a java applet floating around that lets you embed
 theora and view it?
iTheora: http://menguy.aymeric.free.fr/theora/?p=demo

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Using multimedia as a resource to promote Fedora

2008-07-10 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
 Jeff Spaleta wrote:
   Is there a java applet floating around that lets you embed
 theora and view it?

 One option is

 http://www.flumotion.net/cortado/

iTheora, the applet I mentioned here, is based on cortado.

Don't ask me the differences between the 2 options ^^


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: I was just thinking about a Fedora News Channel

2008-06-27 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
Hi,

 I too think there should a Fedora News Channel site covering success
 stories
 with Fedora, Red Hat related news concerning Fedora, educational uses of
 Fedora, multimedia uses, and FUN things to do with it as well.

So do I :)

However, Red Hat already has its own magazine, let's keep both separated,
don't you think ?

 If anyone loves the idea too, let's propose : FedoraNews.wordpress.com,
Why at wordpress.com ? Couldn't Fedora host it ?

 which anyone can add a blog posting, a photo, a video in Theora 
 QuickTime
 from a FUDcon, audio using OGG Vorbis  AAC...
This looks more like a planet to me, and there is already the
planet.fedoraproject.org

IMHO, a FedoraNews site should be run by a journalists team (of course
open for everyone to contribute) with editorial rules so that the content
remains consistent.

 Have a great Fourth of July!

What happens on 4th of July ? o_O


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list