[FYI] MSI MegaBook GX700 sound (headphones | flash)
Hi, I'm running f9 x86_64. If you have no sound in your flash videos or when you plug in your headphones, it doesn't disconnect the sound from the speakers: here is a solution. (found on the ubuntu wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam/MSIMegabookGX700) One needs to set the working model for the card: Add "options snd-hda-intel model=targa-dig" to /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base (create it) After reboot, flash is working as intended and headphones disconnect internal speakers. Hope it helps someone, Olivier -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Fedora how to
Hi Allen, You might find http://www.my-guides.net/en/content/view/103/26/ an interesting read. Enjoy, Olivier 2008/7/4 allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have been researching various linux systems and based on my preferences > Fedora is leading the pack. I would very much like to receive any specific > Fedora how to sites. > > Allen Meyers > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: No vnc desktop with selinux enabled
Hi, You can connect to the box via ssh and forward you vnc port. ex: ssh -L 5900:localhost:5900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then connect your vnc client to localhost on the forwarded port. vncviewer 127.0.0.1:5900 selinux can run normally on your box and the vnc traffic is secured as well. Hope it helps, Olivier Hope it helps 2008/7/5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > I'm having an issue with selinux. Whenever I enable selinux, vnc doens't > start my gnome desktop. I only get a grey screen. Once I set selinux to > permisive, I connect to the vncserver and can see and use my desktop. > How can I use my desktop with selinux enabled? > Thanks, > EJ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
/dev/sr0 disappeared after upgrade f9->f10
Hi, I'm facing a weird issue with /dev/sr0. It disappeared after the upgrade from f9 to f10. [r...@bull ~]# cat /proc/sys/dev/cdrom/info CD-ROM information, Id: cdrom.c 3.20 2003/12/17 drive name: drive speed: drive # of slots: Can close tray: Can open tray: Can lock tray: Can change speed: Can select disk: Can read multisession: Can read MCN: Reports media changed: Can play audio: Can write CD-R: Can write CD-RW: Can read DVD: Can write DVD-R: Can write DVD-RAM: Can read MRW: Can write MRW: Can write RAM: No info of the device which worked perfectly in f9. Anyone had the same issue? I'd be glad if someone could tell me how I can fix this problem. Thanks and regards, Olivier -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: /dev/sr0 disappeared after upgrade f9->f10
Alan, You're right :-) The dmesg parts I could collect are: ata4: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xffa0 irq 14 ata5: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xffa8 irq 15 ata4.00: ATAPI: MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ870PC, 1.00, max UDMA/33 ata4.00: configured for UDMA/33 ata5: port disabled. ignoring. scsi 3:0:0:0: CD-ROMMATSHITA DVD-RAM UJ870PC 1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 sr 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 sr 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5 ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen ata4.00: ST_FIRST: !(DRQ|ERR|DF) ata4.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 res 10/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation) ata4: soft resetting link ata4.00: model number mismatch 'MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ870PC' != 'MATSHITADVDmRAM`UJ8w0PC` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `' ata4.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata4: soft resetting link ata4.00: configured for UDMA/33 ata4: EH complete ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen ata4.00: ST_FIRST: !(DRQ|ERR|DF) ata4.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 res 10/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation) ata4: soft resetting link ata4.00: model number mismatch 'MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ870PC' != 'MATSHITADVDmRAM`UJ8w0PC` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `' ata4.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata4: soft resetting link ata4.00: model number mismatch 'MATSHITADVD-RAM UJ870PC' != 'MATSHITADVDmRAM`UJ8w0PC` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `' ata4.00: revalidation failed (errno=-19) ata4.00: disabled ata4: EH complete Attached is the complete dmesg output. I'll be glad to give more details, just let me know what is needed and how I can provide it :-) BTW, I upgraded from a fully updated Fedora9 to Fedora10 with the DVD (x86), and then update Fedora10. Thanks, Olivier 2009/6/9 Alan Cox > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:12:43 +0200 > Olivier Robert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm facing a weird issue with /dev/sr0. It disappeared after the upgrade > > from f9 to f10. > > To quote The Prisoner "We need information" > > The relevant bits from dmesg after boot, the type of controllers and > CD-ROM etc would make it rather easier to guess further. > > Alan > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > dmesg.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: /dev/sr0 disappeared after upgrade f9->f10
Alan, Thanks for your input. I'll be waiting for 2.6.29 and see if it works then. Regards, Olivier 2009/6/10 Alan Cox > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:43:59 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 18:04:52 +0100, > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:12:43 +0200 > > > Olivier Robert wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm facing a weird issue with /dev/sr0. It disappeared after the > upgrade > > > > from f9 to f10. > > > > > > To quote The Prisoner "We need information" > > > > You mean number 2. > > > > And of course, number 6's reply of "You won't get it." makes this > probably > > not the best example. > > Chuckle > > However in this case we did - and it means I've got some things to look > into. Its either both devices trying to talk at once (confused cable > select perhaps) or us making a hash of the speed/mode setup. Some cases > of that have been fixed by 2.6.29 so the errata kernel might work. > > Promise is probably the most problematic IDE driver we have and its one > of those annoying "works for most people including the author" things so > I've not been able to pin it down in depth. > > > Alan (numb...@the-village.bc.nu) > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
