F12 checksum file says it is SHA1 but it is SHA256
Hi, the file Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM which is on the mirrors and included in the torrents says: Hash: SHA1 f0ad929cd259957e160ea442eb80986b5f01daaffdbcc7e5a1840a666c4447c7 *Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso But the truth is that it is SHA256. (I downloaded the DVD twice because of this...) So maybe someone could change that if I am right? Cheers Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende SG Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible. Cheers Stefan. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:02:18 +0200 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com wrote: JN - kpathsea packages should now be correctly obsoleted. The JN lcdf-typetools dep errors you might see installing JN texlive-collection-fontutils is caused by the fact that JN lcdf-typetools in Fedora is linked against kpathsea libraries and JN TeX Live 2009 increases the soname so lcdf-typetools will work JN after rebuilt with the new kpathsea Trying to do an update on F11 (586) today. It still caused: dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende Abhängigkeit: libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) (sorry for the German) So dvipdfm seems not to be obsoleted by texlive-dvipdfm... Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Upgrade to F11, now yum python module missing
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:37 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG During the DVD upgrade from F10 - F11 I encountered the issue that SG my yum appears broken now: SG SG SG There was a problem importing one of the Python modules SG required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was: SG SGNo module named yum SG I could solve it by installing the yum rpm directly via rpm but I needed the force argument. Somehow the yum was not upgraded correctly, give the hint that the old yum was still there. Thx anyway. Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Upgrade to F11, now yum python module missing
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: SV You can try: SV 1. download yum 3.2.23 from F11-updates SV 2. install it with rpm -Uvh pkg SV SV or SV SV 1. export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages SV 2. yum update yum SV SV I'm curious if this second one will work. Thanks for the advice. I tried the first solution so sorry that I cannot tell whether the second works. Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
