Re: Come back
2010/1/8 Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr: I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan. As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11 branches? As it has been updated last more than three months ago, it needs a new review, iirc. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package - Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
Hi, the repository at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages/ contains a lot of rawhide (f12) packages, so it can no longer be used on f11, was that intentional? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com: Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should successfully obsolete it. But doing installation that way, I end up with both installed: tex-preview-11.85-8.fc11.noarch texlive-preview-2009-11.84.13530.fc11.noarch Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. - Thomas -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: KDE vs. GNOME on F10
2009/8/5 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com: If we just want to dump all the latest stuff in there, why bother with freezes and releases at all ? We could all just use rawhide... While often repeated, I don't think that argument is true. Some people (including me) like the idea of having a 'rolling release', but that's *not* the same as running rawhide. Even in a 'rolling release' scenario, packages would be in a 'staging area first for a while for testing, before being moved to the main repo. And back to the topic, afaik the KDE 4.3 packages have indeed been tested (via kde-redhat/testing etc) before being thrown on the f10 f11 users. - Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphans on the chopping block for F12
2009/7/29 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com: As today is the Feature Freeze, I am preparing to block all the unblocked orphans. This is your last chance to pick one of them up. Those that remain unblocked at the end of my day (around UTC) will be blocked. Unblocked orphan surfraw Unblocked orphan viewmtn Took those. -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: dependency errors while upgrading from F10 to Rawhide (F11)
2009/5/26 Uwe Kiewel m...@kiewel-online.ch: [r...@alberta ~]# yum --enablerepo=rawhide --disablerepo=fedora update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. Eg. /metalink/ removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors: //var/cache/yum/updates/mirrorlist.txt Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: updates [r...@alberta ~]# Same here. Updating fedora-release first (the normal procedure) did not work, showing the very same error. See also bz 494054. So from f10+updates (downgraded fedora-relase back to the f10 version), I used: % yum --enablerepo=rawhide upgrade yum fedora-release and afterwards simply % yum upgrade without manually changing any of the repos files. Maybe that two-step procedure is no longer necessary when yum 3.2.23 hits f10updates. The tickets says it is now in updates-testing. - Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: fedorahosted mtn
2008/12/11 Roland McGrath rol...@redhat.com: Thomas Moschny maintains the mtn-related Fedora packages. He's also the author of the trac plugin. Thomas is the only person I can think of who might be interested in maintaining mtn hosting support for fedorahosted. No, I am currently not interested in doing so. I wasn't involved with any f-h project anyway. Of course I will continue to maintain the mtn related packages in Fedora and EPEL. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
