Re: XFCE depends on GNOME, why?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Javier Perez wrote: > Hi > I tried to install a "pure" XFCE system but I can't > It looks like in order to install XFCE, I have to install also GNOME. > It is so very counterproductive because my idea was to setup a > small,efficient system specifically without GNOME or KDE's overhead. > This is an old computer, with a Celeron processor > > Take a look at this, this is the result of sudo groupinstall XFCE: > > --- > > Dependencies Resolved > > === > Package Arch > Version Repository Size > === > Installing: > Thunar i386 > 0.9.0-4.fc9 fedora 5.7 M > gdm i386 > 1:2.24.0-12.fc10 fedora 1.1 M > thunar-archive-plugini386 > 0.2.4-5.fc10 fedora 39 k > thunar-volmani386 > 0.2.0-2.fc9 fedora 84 k > xfce-utils i386 > 4.4.3-1.fc10 fedora 320 k > xfce4-mailwatch-plugin i386 > 1.1.0-1.fc10 fedora 375 k > xfce4-mixer i386 > 4.4.3-2.fc10 updates189 k > xfce4-panel i386 > 4.4.3-1.fc10 fedora 505 k > xfdesktopi386 > 4.4.2-6.fc10 fedora 2.7 M > Updating: > control-center-filesystemi386 > 1:2.24.0.1-11.fc10updates 40 k > Installing for dependencies: > PolicyKit-gnome i386 > 0.9-3.fc10fedora 123 k > Terminal i386 > 0.2.8.3-1.fc10fedora 1.6 M > at-spi i386 > 1.24.0-5.fc10 fedora 242 k > control-center i386 > 1:2.24.0.1-11.fc10updates2.4 M > eel2 i386 > 2.24.1-4.fc10 updates266 k > evolution-data-serveri386 > 2.24.3-1.fc10 updates4.0 M > exo i386 > 0.3.4-3.fc10 fedora 728 k > fedora-gnome-theme noarch > 8.0.0-7.fc10 fedora 11 k > fedora-icon-themenoarch > 1.0.0-4.fc10 fedora 115 k > gnome-desktopi386 > 2.24.3-1.fc10 updates1.0 M > gnome-mount i386 > 0.8-1.fc9 fedora 148 k > gnome-panel-libs i386 > 2.24.3-1.fc10 updates 60 k > gnome-python2i386 > 2.22.3-1.fc10 fedora 36 k > gnome-python2-gnome i386 > 2.22.3-1.fc10 fedora 83 k > gnome-python2-gnomevfs i386 > 2.22.3-1.fc10 fedora 84 k > gnome-sessioni386 > 2.24.3-1.fc10 updates596 k > gnome-settings-daemoni386 > 2.24.1-7.fc10 updates449 k > gnome-themes noarch > 2.24.3-1.fc10 updates1.6 M > gnome-vfs2 i386 > 2.24.0-3.fc10 fedora 921 k > gtk2-engines i386 > 2.16.1-1.fc10 fedora 313 k > libbonoboui i386 > 2.24.0-1.fc10 fedora 372 k > libcanberra-gtk2 i386 > 0.10-3.fc10 updates 20 k > libgail-gnomei386 > 1.20.1-1.fc10 fedora 26 k > libgnome i386 > 2.24.1-7.fc10 fedora 693 k > libgnomeui i386 > 2.24.0-2.fc10 fedora 1.0 M > libnotifyi386 > 0.4.4-12.fc10 fedora 34 k > metacity i386 > 2.24.0-2.fc10 fedora 1.5 M > notification-daemon i386 > 0.3.7.90-1.svn3009.fc10 fedora 49 k > notification-daemon-engine-nodokai386 > 0.1.0-3.fc10
Re: FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090123
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I plan to add some extras/customized packages, so Xfce spin ks is not >> ok for me. That why I wrote : "this is NOT official product of Fedora >> Project ..." > > ok. Note that if you are adding packages that are not in fedora, please > use 'generic-logos' instead of 'fedora-logos' package. > Thanks, I'll use this package for next build. Cheers, -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090123
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Why don't you join in with the Fedoraunity group. > http://www.fedoraunity.org/ > The sum of the parts and all that. > Thanks, I'll have a look to this project. Cheers, -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090123
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:54:57 +0100 > Vnpenguin wrote: > >> This is a customized spin XFCE desktop on Fedora 10 with all updates >> to 23-Jan-2009. >> >> _Warning_: this is NOT official product of Fedora Project, just my >> personal work. > > Ah, I see the below announce page now has a link to the kickstart file. > > It looks like you are using your own ks file? > Why not use the one we use to make the Xfce spin? I plan to add some extras/customized packages, so Xfce spin ks is not ok for me. That why I wrote : "this is NOT official product of Fedora Project ..." > The iso file says it's i386, but you mean i686? In fact, the iso was built on a i686 box. This text "i386" is produced by pungi. Cheers, -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090123
This is a customized spin XFCE desktop on Fedora 10 with all updates to 23-Jan-2009. _Warning_: this is NOT official product of Fedora Project, just my personal work. Linuxtracker page: http://tinyurl.com/cjzynf Announce page on VNOSS (english) : http://forum.vnoss.org/post37911.html Happy Fedoring ! -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090108
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > So, are there any changes between this and the Xfce livecd spin? > (Aside from updates?) This is installation CD, not liveCD ! > Can you post the kickstart file you used? I have no access to my server now. I'll post it tomorrow. -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090108
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Vnpenguin wrote: > Hello Fedora's fans, > > FC-One XFCE build 20090108 is available ! > > * Only One CD for full XFCE desktop > * With all update of Fedora 10 to 08-Jan-2009 > * List of all package: http://tinyurl.com/7mg64p > * Use for fresh installation only. Don't use it to update your Fedora box! > > * If you have an account on Linuxtracker [1], login into your account > & download torrent by following link [1]. > * If you have not account yet, don't use anonymous torrent, use the > following torrent : http://tinyurl.com/6scmsg > > Happy Fedoring & Seeding ! > -- > http://vnoss.org > > [1]: http://tinyurl.com/9m9ann > Sorry, the good link [1] is http://tinyurl.com/aytb8l :-) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
FC10 XFCE desktop build 20090108
Hello Fedora's fans, FC-One XFCE build 20090108 is available ! * Only One CD for full XFCE desktop * With all update of Fedora 10 to 08-Jan-2009 * List of all package: http://tinyurl.com/7mg64p * Use for fresh installation only. Don't use it to update your Fedora box! * If you have an account on Linuxtracker [1], login into your account & download torrent by following link [1]. * If you have not account yet, don't use anonymous torrent, use the following torrent : http://tinyurl.com/6scmsg Happy Fedoring & Seeding ! -- http://vnoss.org [1]: http://tinyurl.com/9m9ann -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Customised F10 iso with updated packages - how?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > > > > Vnpenguin-2 wrote: >> >> >> Use pungi, >> By using this tool, I can build a install CD for XFCE desktop with all >> updates. Have a look at http://tinyurl.com/8mqutd >> >> > > I'd like to see your page but the link is giving me a 404! Sorry ! Try this: http://tinyurl.com/9m9ann -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Customised F10 iso with updated packages - how?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote: > > Thanks for the link which is useful - though it seems to concentrate largely > on live media. My primary interest in this case is to make install media but > include updated rpms. It looks like revisor will be the optional tool so I > will need to do some reading about it... Use pungi, By using this tool, I can build a install CD for XFCE desktop with all updates. Have a look at http://tinyurl.com/8mqutd -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> MKas wrote: >> >>> I like KDE, but what I see: >>> >>> bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome* >> >> Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE? > > > True. But it makes the arguement that KDE in Fedora is vibrant more > difficult when you can't have KDE without Gnome. > > bluez i3864.19-1.fc10 installed 979 > k > firefox i3863.0.5-1.fc10 installed 14 > M > firstboot i3861.102-1.fc10 installed 652 > k > kdeutilsi3866:4.1.3-1.fc10installed 5.6 > M > setroubleshoot noarch 2.0.12-3.fc10 installed 275 > k > system-config-date noarch 1.9.34-1.fc10 installed 3.8 > M > system-config-keyboard noarch 1.2.15-4.fc10 installed 189 > k > system-config-network noarch 1.5.93-2.fc10 installed 1.8 > M > system-config-printer i3861.0.12-2.fc10 installed 1.6 > M > system-config-samba noarch 1.2.67-3.fc10 installed 2.1 > M > system-config-services noarch 0.99.28-3.fc10installed 1.5 > M > xulrunner i3861.9.0.5-1.fc10installed 22 > M > > None of the above should need gnome libs to work. gtk libs, sure.. but > not Gnome. > Yes, I have a lot of *gnome* package in my customized XFCE *only* desktop spin :-) That's the life, I have to live with :-) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Intel i7
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Louis E Garcia II wrote: > I'm looking at the Dell XPS Studio with the new intel i7 chip. Anyone > have experience with this new chipset with fedora? > > -Thanks > Not with Fedora, but we have a CentOS 5.2 server with this new processor. It works well :-) = processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 26 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz stepping: 4 cpu MHz : 1600.000 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr popcnt lahf_lm bogomips: 5349.45 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > uname -a Linux foo.bar 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 09:19:49 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I think you can run Fedora without problem :) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: XFCE 4.5.92 rpm for Fedora 10 ?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:33:46 +0100 > Vnpenguin wrote: > >> Any rpm packages of XFCE 4.5.92 for Fedora 10 ? > > I'm working on them. ;) Wow, it's so cool :-) > As soon as I have everything looking ok, they will go into rawhide. > > I might be able to do some f10 rpms for brave people who wish to > test. ;) If you have rpms, I could test with my FC 10 box here, Cheers, -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
XFCE 4.5.92 rpm for Fedora 10 ?
Any rpm packages of XFCE 4.5.92 for Fedora 10 ? TIA, -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:09 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote: >> Hi, >> I can't update FC10. Here is error: > > You need this: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 > > Richard. > I think Fedora's repos need that, not me personally :-) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
Hi, I can't update FC10. Here is error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum update Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 for package: gnome-packagekit ---> Package transmission.i386 0:1.40-1.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package PackageKit-yum.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package pangomm.i386 0:2.14.1-1.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-25.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package PackageKit-yum-plugin.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package cjkunifonts-uming.noarch 0:0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package PackageKit-glib.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package gnome-settings-daemon.i386 0:2.24.1-3.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package gtkmm24.i386 0:2.14.3-1.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package PackageKit-udev-helper.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package PackageKit.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Any idea ? -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Excel to CSV batch
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Jonathan Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List, > > Does anyone know of any software that converts Excel format spreadsheets > into CSV files in a command-line batch mode ? Obviously OpenOffice can > do this but requires an interactive load/save cycle - I'm trying to do > this in an email-triggered shell script. > A simple Perl script could do it -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: samba and write privileges
Put all user into a group & play with "create mask" Samba option. On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > On a samba share which anyone can see but just a few can write to, how can I > make the files writable by anyone with write access? > Right now, when a user with write access creates a file and it can only be > modified by that user. > Thanks, > EJ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@redhat.com > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
