[Bug 552554] Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552554 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 553140] Merge Review: perl-MailTools - Various mail-related perl modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553140 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 553142] Merge Review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553142 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552564] Merge Review: perl-IO-stringy - I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com, p...@city-fan.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-01-07 15:21:17 EDT --- This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red Hat's bugzilla. It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us bugzilla, which is no longer available. I'm not aware of any Fedora procedure which would require that these packages be re-reviewed (though I don't necessarily think that it would be a terrible idea if only the existing review queue weren't so long). Could you indicate just why you believe this needs a re-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@di.uminho.pt --- Comment #4 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt 2010-01-07 16:02:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red Hat's bugzilla. It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us bugzilla, which is no longer available. The review was done in Fedora US bugzilla (and most likely by Ville Skytta). The announcement is still available here: * http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-17805.html /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 542645] perl-IO-Compress-Base use name space Validator::
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542645 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-01-07 16:56:58 EDT --- perl-5.10.0-87.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 542645] perl-IO-Compress-Base use name space Validator::
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542645 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||5.10.0-87.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] New: Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Tie-IxHash AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Tie-IxHash/1.21/10.fc12/src/perl-Tie-IxHash-1.21-10.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1426615filename=perl-Tie-IxHash.spec Description: This Perl module implements Perl hashes that preserve the order in which the hash elements were added. The order is not affected when values corresponding to existing keys in the IxHash are changed. The elements can also be set to any arbitrary supplied order. The familiar perl array operations can also be performed on the IxHash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-package-rev...@redha ||t.com, nott...@redhat.com Component|perl-Tie-IxHash |Package Review AssignedTo|tcall...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] New: Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Summary: Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perltidy AssignedTo: ville.sky...@iki.fi ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, ville.sky...@iki.fi Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perltidy/20090616/2.fc12/src/perltidy-20090616-2.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1458511filename=perltidy.spec Description: Perltidy is a Perl script which indents and reformats Perl scripts to make them easier to read. If you write Perl scripts, or spend much time reading them, you will probably find it useful. The formatting can be controlled with command line parameters. The default parameter settings approximately follow the suggestions in the Perl Style Guide. Perltidy can also output html of both pod and source code. Besides reformatting scripts, Perltidy can be a great help in tracking down errors with missing or extra braces, parentheses, and square brackets because it is very good at localizing errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-package-rev...@redha ||t.com, nott...@redhat.com Component|perltidy|Package Review AssignedTo|ville.sky...@iki.fi |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mmasl...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-01-06 06:17:53 EDT --- Hm, what's this about, a merge review with what? We do have perltidy in Fedora and have had it for a long time, I maintain it, and the SRPM and spec links in the initial comment point to the 2nd latest Fedora perltidy build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mmasl...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-01-06 06:35:21 EDT --- Sadly for import to next RHEL, we need formal review ticket for every package. I didn't find any for this, because it was done probably long time ago without ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Triaged AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mc...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822
--- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-01-06 07:35:29 EDT ---
+ GOOD: rpmlint is bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i
bradford:devel$ rpmlint -i perltidy-20090616-3.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
bradford:devel$ rpmlint -i noarch/perltidy-20090616-3.fc13.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
bradford:devel$
+ GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Package is long time in the practice so renaming doesn't make much sense (and
the name makes sense).
+ GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
- BAD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Actually it should be GPLv2 only (not GPLv2+ ... cannot find anywhere or
later).
+ GOOD: COPYING file is in %doc.
+ GOOD: The spec file is written in American English.
+ GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible.
+ GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
MD5: 63baa94a96fc5c272e06e72e589e7673
+ GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
yes, builds on x86_64/F12
+ GOOD: it's noarch so no issues with other architectures.
+ GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=121809
+ GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
No locale support.
+ GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK
no scripts
+ GOOD: not relocatable
- UNSURE: A package owns all directories that it creates.
I don't like this in %files:
%{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/
Is this correct? Why not just
%{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/Tidy.pm
+ GOOD: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ GOOD: Permissions on files are set automatically.
+ GOOD: Each package have a %clean section.
+ GOOD: Each package consistently use macros.
+ GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage.
+ GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ GOOD: No header files.
+ GOOD: No static libraries.
+ GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package.
no .so file
+ GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage.
no -devel package
+ GOOD: No .la libtool archives.
+ GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications.
+ GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
+ GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install
+ GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
+ GOOD: Includes license text.
Please correct the indicated issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822
--- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-01-06
07:48:47 EDT ---
License:
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SHANCOCK/Perl-Tidy-20090616/lib/Perl/Tidy.pm
GPLv2+ is valid
%{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/
I suppose someone has to own this directory. That's the perl way.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-01-06 08:54:58 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
%{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/
I suppose someone has to own this directory. That's the perl way.
That's actually the general packaging guidelines way, the dir would be unowned
otherwise.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-01-06 11:07:23 EDT --- Umm, Marcela? This package is already in Fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2010-01-06 18:03:31 EDT --- OK, I feel persuaded. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-01-07 02:26:40 EDT --- Yes, but I didn't find a merge or package review ticket and I need one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552613] New: please branch perl-ExtUtils-Depends for EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please branch perl-ExtUtils-Depends for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552613 Summary: please branch perl-ExtUtils-Depends for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-ExtUtils-Depends AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: ke...@tummy.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Greetings. I am looking at getting Xfce branched for EPEL. xfconf needs perl-Glib, which in turn needs this package. If you don't want to maintain it in EPEL, I would be happy to do so. It rebuilds with no changes for EL-5 here. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552616] New: branch perl-Glib for EPEL-5 please
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: branch perl-Glib for EPEL-5 please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552616 Summary: branch perl-Glib for EPEL-5 please Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Glib AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: ke...@tummy.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora I am looking at getting Xfce in EPEL, and xfconf needs this package (which in turn needs perl-ExtUtils-Depends which I have also asked to be branched). If you make the minor change to perl BuildRequires here the package builds fine on EL-5, however, it seems to fail it's %tests: ... t/64bitGLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_param_spec_int64: assertion `default_value = minimum default_value = maximum' failed at t/64bit.t line 20. # Failed test 'The object isa Glib::Param::Int64' # in t/64bit.t at line 24. # The object isn't defined Can't call method get_minimum on an undefined value at t/64bit.t line 25. # Looks like you planned 12 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1 run. # Looks like your test died just after 1. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 1-12 Failed 12/12 tests, 0.00% okay (note this is on a 32bit build). Perhaps something with RHEL's perl ? I'd be happy to help maintain for EPEL-5. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552616] branch perl-Glib for EPEL-5 please
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552616 --- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-01-05 12:05:26 EDT --- Please block this on the bug for perl-ExtUtils-Depends, and I'll look at getting this working on EL-5 after the other bug is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552613] please branch perl-ExtUtils-Depends for EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552613 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||552616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552616] branch perl-Glib for EPEL-5 please
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552616 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||552613 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-01-05 12:33:03 EDT --- Yeah, done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||532190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 540111] [abrt] crash detected in emacs-1:23.1-10.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540111 Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||besfa...@redhat.com, ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com Component|emacs |pango AssignedTo|kk...@redhat.com|besfa...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 04:28:08 EDT --- As far as I can tell this is a crash in pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 550937] Error message during Upgrade with latest package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550937 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 522187] SWT crash with GTK 2.18 and GNOME accessibility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #37 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 08:59:06 EDT --- I'll try to get an F-12 build with these fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 532571] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090923-1.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532571 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2010-01-04 15:05:03 EDT --- no preferences as long as the fix ends up in rawhide and the bug is eventually closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 551317] [te_IN] A dash becomes a long empty space.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2010-01-04 02:08:27 EDT --- thats nice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 551988] New: perl-Math-Pari-2.010806-3.fc13 fails to build for ppc64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Math-Pari-2.010806-3.fc13 fails to build for ppc64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551988 Summary: perl-Math-Pari-2.010806-3.fc13 fails to build for ppc64 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Math-Pari AssignedTo: p...@city-fan.org ReportedBy: jwbo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: perl-Math-Pari-2.010806-3.fc13 fails to build for ppc64. It seems one of the testcases run during the build fails. This same package builds for 32-bit ppc just fine. Logs here: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 552105] New: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105 Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: t...@tim-landscheidt.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=381464) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381464) Patch to ignore recommends dependencies. With cpanspec 1.78, META.yml's recommends dependencies are treated as requires ones. That is way too harsh and easily requires many more package updates than ordinarily necessary. The attached patch fixes this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530760] fontlint can not parse ./ relative paths
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530760 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-31 23:23:26 EDT --- I've just commited a patch from upstream to fix this. Can you test? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1897326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 508197] virt-top segfaults if run in Japanese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508197 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-12-30 04:24:17 EDT --- Ugh x 2. The message catalog for DE is broken. The format strings don't have matching %s, eg: $ msgunfmt /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/virt-top.mo [...] msgid %s: display should be %s msgstr '%s' sollte numerisch sein. msgid %s: sort order should be: %s msgstr Soll eine Palette verwendet werden? The gettext library is supposed to be catching this sort of error, but obviously that bit doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
[Bug 508197] virt-top segfaults if run in Japanese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508197 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|UPSTREAM| --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-12-30 04:21:49 EDT --- Ugh so it does. There must be another bug in the locale code. Reopening ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
[Bug 508197] virt-top segfaults if run in Japanese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508197 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-12-30 12:30:56 EDT --- The problem was simply that I'd built the package against the old, broken ocaml-gettext library, and not the new fixed version. Please try upgrading to virt-top 1.0.4-3 (in Rawhide): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=148899 I also need to backport ocaml-gettext 0.3.3 to Fedora 12 and rebuild virt-top in F12 against that. Not done yet - so I'll leave this bug open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
[Bug 544245] CVE-2009-3585 rt3: session hijack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544245 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-31 01:54:45 EDT --- rt3-3.6.10-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 544245] CVE-2009-3585 rt3: session hijack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544245 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.6.10-1.el5 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 551317] New: A dash becomes a long empty space.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Summary: A dash becomes a long empty space. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: psatp...@redhat.com ReportedBy: psa...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: peter...@redhat.com, pnem...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, psatp...@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora I have typed my Telugu text here using firefox browser http://www.google.com/transliterate/indic/Telugu and pasted it into OpenOffice Writer 3.1 with Lohit Telugu font version 2.4.5 selected. Everything seem to be working fine though the newer Lohit font looks smaller than an older version of Lohit font I was using earlier. But the main problem here is, a dash (-) becomes an empty space. It looks like a long space that is equivalent two chars approx. I also tried to type a dash right in the OO but it doesn't work. If I select Pothana2000 font instead of Lohit in OO, all my dashes work fine. The Pothana2000 is another Unicode font for Telugu but I love the rounded letter shapes of Lohit font so much! Thanks a lot for this beautiful Lohit Telugu font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 551317] [te_IN] A dash becomes a long empty space.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||kkrot...@redhat.com Component|lohit-fonts |lohit-telugu-fonts Summary|A dash becomes a long empty |[te_IN] A dash becomes a |space. |long empty space. --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-30 00:11:30 EDT --- thanks for reporting bug, this is major one i will fix it quickly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 551317] [te_IN] A dash becomes a long empty space.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551317 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-30 01:53:28 EDT --- fixed in lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.5-4.fc13 will be available in tomorrows rawhide. test it and let me know if any other issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 508197] virt-top segfaults if run in Japanese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508197 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@niemueller.de --- Comment #10 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2009-12-29 09:50:51 EDT --- This still breaks if run with de_DE.UTF-8 locale. It works fine when run with LANG=C virt-top. This is virt-top-1.0.4-1.fc12.1.x86_64 on F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
[Bug 550937] Error message during Upgrade with latest package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550937 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 03:12:04 EDT --- thanks for notifying same, just build package with fix for rawhide i guess it will be available in tomorrows rawhide lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.5-3.fc13.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 548686] [Indic] license should be GPLv2 with exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548686 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 06:01:04 EDT --- fixed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 549319] lohit fonts .conf template is not matching with standard template given by fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549319 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 06:01:36 EDT --- fixed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 549887] SIGSEGV in _pango_cairo_font_private_get_scaled_font in /usr/bin/blueman-manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549887 Runwalsoft m_run...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(m_run...@yahoo.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Runwalsoft m_run...@yahoo.com 2009-12-27 23:15:06 EDT --- Sorry again. Due to machine problem things are crashed. roll-backing this error reporting. thanks for giving time. and sorry for taking your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 550937] New: Error message during Upgrade with latest package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Error message during Upgrade with latest package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550937 Summary: Error message during Upgrade with latest package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-telugu-fonts AssignedTo: psatp...@redhat.com ReportedBy: aa...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, psatp...@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Following Error while update with Yum (Rawhide) -- Updating : lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.5-2.fc13.noarch 161/764 Fontconfig error: /etc/fonts/conf.d/66-lohit-telugu.conf, line 1: not well-formed (invalid token) -- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.5-2.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Update package with this latest package 2. 3. Actual results: Error message Expected results: upgrade should normal without any error message Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525624] [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CBC has error result.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525624 A S Alam aa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 02:36:18 EDT --- it is fixed with following verison: pango-1.26.1-1.fc143 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525627] [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CE[2-3] have error results.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525627 A S Alam aa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 02:40:14 EDT --- Fixed with following version pango-1.26.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497311] Dependent Vowel (0CBC) are Render as Independenet vowel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497311 A S Alam aa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-12-28 02:41:22 EDT --- bug is fixed with latest release in rawhide: pango-1.26.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 514942] An assertion in FindRef.xs fails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514942 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-12-27 06:32:55 EDT --- A rebuild of the same version of the package showed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=148659 -- + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/00use.t ... ok t/01count.t . ok t/02one.t ... ok t/03weak.t .. ok t/04reftypes.t .. ok t/99pod.t ... ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=21, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.02 sys + 0.16 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.24 CPU) Result: PASS + exit 0 -- So it seems that a rebuild of perl was needed, closing to NOTABUG because the bug was of perl with DEBUG and not related to this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 549886] [abrt] crash detected in NetworkManager-gnome-1:0.7.996-7.git20091113.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549886
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|NetworkManager |pango
CC||besfa...@redhat.com,
||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
||at.com
AssignedTo|d...@redhat.com |besfa...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Dan Williams d...@redhat.com 2009-12-26 05:24:23 EDT ---
Pango:
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x0079d087 in _pango_cairo_font_private_get_scaled_font (
cf_priv=value optimized out) at pangocairo-font.c:156
156 }
Thread 1 (Thread 2019):
#0 0x0079d087 in _pango_cairo_font_private_get_scaled_font (
cf_priv=value optimized out) at pangocairo-font.c:156
font_face = 0x453124b
#1 0x007a0ed1 in pango_cairo_fc_font_lock_face (font=value optimized out)
at pangocairo-fcfont.c:117
scaled_font = value optimized out
#2 0x00aab3fe in pango_fc_font_lock_face (font=value optimized out)
at pangofc-font.c:676
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = pango_fc_font_lock_face
#3 0x00ac502c in basic_engine_shape (engine=value optimized out,
font=value optimized out, text=value optimized out,
length=value optimized out, analysis=value optimized out,
glyphs=value optimized out) at basic-fc.c:146
face = 0xbfd09608
desc = {script = 73151872, language = 0x9bebe7,
static_gsub_features = 0x30, n_static_gsub_features = 2019,
static_gpos_features = 0x45c31a4, n_static_gpos_features =
73152808, other_features = 0x1, n_other_features = 3218118200}
ruleset = value optimized out
buffer = value optimized out
n_chars = value optimized out
p = 0x2c Address 0x2c out of bounds
cluster = 0
i = value optimized out
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = basic_engine_shape
#4 0x04694aab in _pango_engine_shape_shape (engine=value optimized out,
font=value optimized out, text=value optimized out,
length=value optimized out, analysis=value optimized out,
glyphs=value optimized out) at pango-engine.c:71
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 550501] [abrt] crash detected in gkrellm-2.3.2-7.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550501 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|gkrellm |pango CC||besfa...@redhat.com, ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com AssignedTo|hdego...@redhat.com |besfa...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-12-26 05:40:30 EDT --- Hmm, the backtrace points to a problem with double free (or other heap corruption) inside pango, changing component to pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 532571] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090923-1.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532571 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-26 20:43:41 EDT --- Upstream has duplicated this and checked in a fix to CVS. We could leave this open, or just close it now and I will pick up the fix with the next upstream release. Up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 530853] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530853 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-26 20:50:10 EDT --- Upstream says: I am unable to duplicate this. For me fontlint runs to completion and produces an error message. I am seeing that here too: Validation TimesMedium ...Failed Missing BlueValues entry in PostScript Private dictionary Can you confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 532341] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532341
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-26 20:54:34 EDT ---
Upstream unable to duplicate and now I am not getting a segfault either:
fontlint TribunADFStd-Italic.ttf 18:53:33
Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
The following table(s) in the font have been ignored by FontForge
Ignoring 'DSIG' digital signature table
Ignoring 'LTSH' linear threshold table
Ignoring 'VDMX' vertical device metrics table
Ignoring 'hdmx' horizontal device metrics table
This font contains both a 'kern' table and a 'GPOS' table.
The 'kern' table will only be read if there is no 'kern' feature in 'GPOS'.
This font contains both a 'mor[tx]' table and a 'GSUB' table.
FF will only read feature/settings in 'morx' which do not match features
found in 'GSUB'.
This font contains both a 'BASE' table and a 'bsln' table.
FontForge will only read one of them ('BASE').
Validation TribunADFStd-Italic ...Passed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 532372] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090622-2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532372 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-26 20:57:25 EDT --- I'm getting a normal error here: fontlint /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi/helvO12-ISO8859-2.pcf.gz Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Validation HelveticaMediumOblique ...Failed Missing BlueValues entry in PostScript Private dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 532577] [abrt] crash detected in fontforge-20090923-1.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532577 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-12-26 20:59:40 EDT --- I'm getting a normal output now here as well: fontlint /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/urw/helvetic/uhvrrc8a.pfb Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009. Validation NimbusSanL-ReguCond ...Failed Missing Points at Extrema Disordered elements in either the BlueValues or OtherBlues entries in the PostScript Private dictionary Elements too close in either the BlueValues or OtherBlues entries in the PostScript Private dictionary (must be at least 2*BlueFuzz+1 apart) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499466] The perl-spreadsheet-parseexcel module reads data incorrectly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499466 Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||jpazdzi...@redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com 2009-12-26 17:01:45 EDT --- Fedora 11 seems to contain perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.4900-2.fc11 which according to comment 0 should fix the problem. In that case, this bugzilla probably should be closed with NEXTRELEASE, and not WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522187] SWT crash with GTK 2.18 and GNOME accessibility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #36 from Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org 2009-12-26 02:04:24 EDT --- I'm having the same problems as Mads - pydev is not working with 3.5.1-27.f13 and I needed to install a new version of jetty to get this eclipse version to install on f12. I see this problem with accessibility on and off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mathieu.bri...@gmail.com| --- Comment #24 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2009-12-24 10:53:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) any updates here? Not really. I'm terribly sorry, I haven't had time to fix this properly. :-/ To sum up : 1. I worked around the initial issue by patching the sources 2. Nicolas added that other parameters might be incorrect and would need to be fixed 3. I never got any answer from upstream, even if I contacted them several times at different email addresses... Thanks for poking me, I'll try to have a look at all this, but if anyone wants to beat me to it, I'd be more than happy to give the necessary ACLs in PackageDB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 519712] flags argument of $pool-refresh() undocumented
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519712 Gunannan Ren g...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Gunannan Ren g...@redhat.com 2009-12-24 05:03:40 EDT --- The bug has been fixed in perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-5.el5 Sys::Virt::StoragePool manual added the flags usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 468565] Checkbox won't select on fillable PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468565 Daryll dar...@daryll.net changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |12 --- Comment #7 from Daryll dar...@daryll.net 2009-12-23 13:33:03 EDT --- Please re-open, problem persists in Fedora 12. The change from Matthias appears to be installed on F12, but when I move the mouse over a checkbox, the pointer turns to a finger, but clicking the square does not do anything. Testing using the same IRS W-9 rev Oct 2007 that's included in my earlier report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] cjkuni-uming bold face not working at 11pt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||OpenOffice.org 107834 External Bug ID|OpenOffice.org 92859| --- Comment #9 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 09:01:29 EDT --- There's no point in tracking things that don't get fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] cjkuni-uming bold face not working at 11pt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 09:03:57 EDT --- hmm, no point in... wasn't intended for here :-). OOo-specific issue alright, some plausible fixes submitted upstream and checked in locally. Will be in = 3.1.1-19.24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 522187] SWT crash with GTK 2.18 and GNOME accessibility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #33 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 15:55:20 EDT --- I'm building some updated RPMs with a patch for this issue back-ported from upstream: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887104 If anyone can give those a shot with accessibility enabled and see if there are still crasher bugs, I'd appreciate it. I think bug #547056 is a dupe of this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 522187] SWT crash with GTK 2.18 and GNOME accessibility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Eclipse Project 291128 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 522187] SWT crash with GTK 2.18 and GNOME accessibility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522187 --- Comment #34 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 16:56:17 EDT --- Oops, there was an issue with my SRPM. Here's a better koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] cjkuni-uming bold face not working at 11pt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #11 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 18:48:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) I imagine this is emboldening gone wrong +- embedded bitmaps or sommat I tested both with embedded bitmaps on and off. Same problem was observed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 549887] SIGSEGV in _pango_cairo_font_private_get_scaled_font in /usr/bin/blueman-manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549887 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||besfa...@redhat.com, ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com Component|python |pango AssignedTo|dmalc...@redhat.com |besfa...@redhat.com Summary|[abrt] crash detected in|SIGSEGV in |python-2.6.2-2.fc12 |_pango_cairo_font_private_ ||get_scaled_font in ||/usr/bin/blueman-manager Flag||needinfo?(m_run...@yahoo.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 19:06:29 EDT --- Thank you for reporting this bug. If you run the program from a terminal, is an error message printed? What version of blueman and pango do you have installed? Looking at the backtrace, it looks like the problem occurred in the program's single thread in _pango_cairo_font_private_get_scaled_font Reassigning component from python to pango, but could be a blueman issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 --- Comment #23 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-23 01:19:21 EDT --- any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts needs lang fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 04:24:09 EDT --- However the 65-wqy-zenhei.conf is not enough. :-( I think we need to get rid of 65-nonlatin.conf! or at least prune it (of fedora fonts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts needs lang fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|12 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Cong Ma frigoris...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||caol...@redhat.com Component|cjkuni-fonts|openoffice.org --- Comment #5 from Cong Ma frigoris...@gmail.com 2009-12-21 04:39:18 EDT --- Thanks for the insight. I've changed the component field to openoffice.org. I'm using oo.o version 3.1.1-19.22.fc12 and can confirm Caius' report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 549319] New: lohit fonts .conf template is not matching with standard template given by fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lohit fonts .conf template is not matching with standard template given by fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549319 Summary: lohit fonts .conf template is not matching with standard template given by fontconfig Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-hindi-fonts AssignedTo: psatp...@redhat.com ReportedBy: psatp...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, psatp...@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: about this see comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546490#c13 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: it is prepend_first Expected results: it should be prepend as per template Additional info: same bug is in all lohit fonts packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 530085] [or_IN] [mr_IN] [hi_IN] window titlebar has horizontal line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530085 Manoj Kumar Giri mg...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mg...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Manoj Kumar Giri mg...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 06:58:34 EDT --- I faced the same problem while testing for Oriya interface (or_IN) in most of the applications in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cl...@jhcloos.com --- Comment #12 from James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com 2009-12-21 18:18:10 EDT --- Suitable fontconfig scripts can help here. I use these two scripts to force the autofitter for non-glyf fonts (there is an open rfe for freetype to replace the type1/cff hinting module with one which uses the autofit module, but taking advantage of the type1/cff hints; this would be an excellent project for anyone who wants to delve into font rasterization techniques) and to set the filtering to match the chosen hinting option. Combined with fc code akin to: !-- cut here -- match target=font test name=family stringVL Gothic/string /test edit name=autohint mode=assign booltrue/bool /edit /match !-- and here -- one can force the autofitter for some glyf fonts and use the bci for others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 --- Comment #13 from James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com 2009-12-21 18:23:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379733) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379733) Fontconfig conf file to set hintstyle based on each font’s format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 --- Comment #14 from James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com 2009-12-21 18:25:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379737) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379737) Fontconfig conf file to set LCD filter based on each font’s format and hintstyle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532 --- Comment #15 from James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com 2009-12-21 18:28:55 EDT --- Forgot to say: I’d be optimistic that a patch for freetype, which enabled the autofit module for glyphs of an SFNT/glyf font which lack instructions, would get accepted, provided it matched ft’s coding style. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] cjkuni-uming bold face not working at 12pt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Boldface not working with |cjkuni-uming bold face not |some sizes |working at 12pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-22 00:49:33 EDT --- How about F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts needs lang fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fan...@gmail.com|peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-20 19:36:13 EDT --- F13 rawhide is now using comps-f13 and zenhei is not overriding ja so going ahead with the above change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 539116] FTBFS baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-8.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539116 Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-12-20 19:54:52 EDT --- rebuilt is done http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545824] Boldface not working with some sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545824 --- Comment #3 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-12-20 20:14:48 EDT --- Reproducible. However, it is happening only on oowriter, not even on oocalc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 492510] wqy-bitmap-fonts needs lang fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Bug 492510 depends on bug 476459, which changed state. Bug 476459 Summary: wqy-zenhei-fonts needs lang fontconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts needs lang fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|rawhide |12 Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-20 20:18:06 EDT --- Actually I think we should do this for f12 and f11 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ta...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 00:23:37 EDT --- we had some discussion earlier regarding this thing so for querying fontconfig for default font exact way is $fc-match :lang=mr-in $fc-match :lang=(langguage name)- (country code) see bug #546490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525627] [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CE[2-3] have error results.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525627 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC||pnem...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 01:24:01 EDT --- looks fixed in pango-1.26.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525624] [kn_IN][CodePoint] U+0CBC has error result.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525624 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC||pnem...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 01:23:15 EDT --- looks fixed in pango-1.26.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 01:33:42 EDT --- First of all, the behaviour on fontconfig might be changed in the future. keep your eye on Bug#546490 as Pravin said at the above comment. Speaking more technical thing, right now fontconfig doesn't apply the lang to the pattern-matching stage. basically it has been done in FcConfigSubstitute(). most applications using fontconfig is written like: FcConfigSubstitute(0, pat, FcMatchPattern); FcDefaultSubstitute(pat); So the lang from current locale is applied after the pattern-matching is finished. as per our current rules, we are expecting to see the lang thing at the pattern-matching. thus, the lang available at the font-matching stage doesn't affect as expected at all. upstream is aware of this issue but unfortunately no idea to fix that. see the thread in upstream list for more details what the problem is: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2009-November/003275.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 530518] [ne_NP] Remove unnecessary characters from font file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530518 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED --- Comment #3 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 02:06:02 EDT --- Though I still think as we have language specific Lohit fonts now, we should only keep character set of that language in font. For now deferring this for future development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499349] Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||pnem...@redhat.com Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|besfa...@redhat.com |pnem...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 02:11:14 EDT --- Please have a look at Unicode data file http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.2.0/ucd/CompositionExclusions.txt where its clearly said that codepoints U09DC, U09DD, U09DF need more than one backspace key to delete whole character. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525628] [pa_IN][CodePoint]U+0A33 need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525628 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||pnem...@redhat.com Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 02:08:29 EDT --- Please have a look at Unicode data file http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.2.0/ucd/CompositionExclusions.txt where its clearly said that U0A33 need more than one backspace key to delete whole character. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 525628] [pa_IN][CodePoint]U+0A33 need press backspace key twice to delete the whole char
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525628 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|besfa...@redhat.com |pnem...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 540962] [abrt] crash detected in java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-33.b16.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540962 --- Comment #10 from Nikolay Bryskin devel.n...@gmail.com 2009-12-19 06:23:55 EDT --- There is workaround for this bug: disable Assistive technologies in Gnome. My patch just removes symptoms of some bug in gnome assistive technologies, and there is a couple of another places where openjdk crashes. I patched them all, but annoying window now appears instead of crash (when gnome assistive technologies is turned on). So I propose to move this bug to gnome assistive technologies team. Tip: bug occurs when I close any property window in Eclipse by pressing OK button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: digna-fonts |Review Request: |- Handwriting font |oflb-dignas-handwriting-fon ||ts - Handwriting font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
