Re: Prius Gas Mileage
Jon, What list was your question for? I have a Prius and experiencing similar problem too. thanks, -pete On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:36:40 -0800 Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.net wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 19:33 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: The gas mileage on my Prius has slowly declined from about 40 mpg when I bought it in 2005... Please accept my apologies for posting this message, which was intended for another list (8-(. jon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Service to run user-owned init scripts at boot time?
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:18:20 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christian Kreibich wrote:
I am looking for a service that lets regular users place scripts in
a well defined location, say somewhere in their home directory, so
that those scripts will be executed with the respective user's
permissions at system boot time (note, I don't mean user login
time). I was wondering whether Fedora provides a package that'll
provide this so I don't have to set up a solution myself. Thanks...
This should work:
cat /etc/rc.d/rc.local EOF
for i in /home/*/.rc.local ; do
user=${i#/home/}
user=${user%/.rc.local}
su $user -c $i
done
EOF
Kevin Kofler
This should work as long as all the prerequisite services have been
started, such as mounting the file system. One other requirement
is all users accounts are in /home.
-pete
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: That thread - Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:52:22 -0400 max [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: mike cloaked wrote: Most of the complainers do not directly fix things - so we all perhaps need a little patience and do our bit to help rather than simply grumble. Be careful, I'd really like to avoid giving an impression that any stuff like this is unwanted or falls on deaf ears. Just keep in mind that constructive feedback, even in the form of complaining, is invaluable. The constructive part being very important. -- Rex Its hard to listen to a bunch of complaining when there isn't anything constructive included. I want KDE 3.5 back is not what i would consider constructive. When features are in KDE3.5 work better than the newer version, I'll ask for the older version back anytime. You want specific examples: 1) The background on the virtual screen do not spread across all physical screens. (Yes a bug was submitted.) 2) Not able to hide the panel, at least I haven't found a method. There is more, but this is enough to make another choice. KDE 4.0 is not an improvement, when functionality is lost from the previous revision and its not documented. (If I did miss it, please provide a pointer to it.) I also think a complete previous revision should be supplied until the next revision is functionally equivalent. This will give USER the choice of which version to use without being forced to use a choice that he doesn't prefer. Since the choice of KDE 3.5 is not completely available, I'm being forced into is switching to gnome and using kpager from the kde trunk sources. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: That thread - Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10?
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:13:01 -0500 Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pds wrote: When features are in KDE3.5 work better than the newer version, I'll ask for the older version back anytime. You want specific examples: And there are a multitude of specific examples where kde4 is better. This is certainly not constructive feedback. Sigh, if you like kde3, fine, stick with Fedora 8. It's about choice, NOT what is better about KDE4 its more about what is MISSING! If you can't understand that some users work in a specific way or need to work in a specific way then. There could be other reason why I want or might even need Fedora 9, but that is my choice. I would like a choice at least better KDE3.5 and KDE 4.x until 4.x has all the features of 3.5. I also think a complete previous revision should be supplied until the next revision is functionally equivalent. This will give USER the choice Please read the FAQ again. I would *love* to be able to provide just that, and asked developers point-blank if this is something possible(1) or supported. Answer was no. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/KDE4FAQ (1) without horrible hacks or FHS violations. Hmmm The FAQ provide some information, but not exactly what I was asking. What I really read was, that there was not enough resources to provide both KDE3.5 and KDE4.0 with ONLY one installed at a time. I didn't ask to have both kde4 kde3 installed at the same time. Yes, there will always be ways to shoot yourself in the foot. I'll consider this dead since there was a conscious decision to force this issue. I'll look at other distros or methods or means to obtain the features I need. so long... -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: That thread - Any hope of KDE 3.5 in F10?
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:09:57 -0500 Arthur Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:01 PM, pds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:52:22 -0400 max [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: mike cloaked wrote: Most of the complainers do not directly fix things - so we all perhaps need a little patience and do our bit to help rather than simply grumble. Be careful, I'd really like to avoid giving an impression that any stuff like this is unwanted or falls on deaf ears. Just keep in mind that constructive feedback, even in the form of complaining, is invaluable. The constructive part being very important. -- Rex Its hard to listen to a bunch of complaining when there isn't anything constructive included. I want KDE 3.5 back is not what i would consider constructive. When features are in KDE3.5 work better than the newer version, I'll ask for the older version back anytime. You want specific examples: 1) The background on the virtual screen do not spread across all physical screens. (Yes a bug was submitted.) 2) Not able to hide the panel, at least I haven't found a method. There is more, but this is enough to make another choice. KDE 4.0 is not an improvement, when functionality is lost from the previous revision and its not documented. (If I did miss it, please provide a pointer to it.) I also think a complete previous revision should be supplied until the next revision is functionally equivalent. This will give USER the choice of which version to use without being forced to use a choice that he doesn't prefer. Since the choice of KDE 3.5 is not completely available, I'm being forced into is switching to gnome and using kpager from the kde trunk sources. Okay, the magic Fedora KDE slave elves will get on that for you right away master. I'll only bow down to your level enough to say that I hope at some point in the future that someone forces you down the same road -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
