To answer my query of 2009-07-12 14:54:
Does anyone have F11 installed onto an x86_64 machine with Intel fake
RAID - Intel Matrix Storage Manager - ICH9?
Yes, I do now.
When F10 failed to recognize the controller in RAID mode, I turned it
off in the BIOS, and now the F11 install DVD does see the controller,
but appears to get confused about why there is mdraid (my kludge to get
RAID on my system) behind a dmraid controller.
...
... and that was precisely the problem. F10 dmraid was incapable of
detecting the BIOS RAID controller in my laptop (though apparently F9
was, and F11 definitely is). While the Intel/Lenovo docs don't mention
it, the Intel Matrix Storage Manager does, however, write some meta-data
to the disk header, so merely turning off RAID in the BIOS was not The
Right Thing To Do. The F11 install medium comes along and sees both the
Intel meta-data [ => dmraid] and the mdraid meta-data, and the
combination causes it to descend through confusion into madness.
The solution was to boot up one last time in F10 and use mdadm to zero
out the mdraid meta-data & my data. Next, go into the BIOS and re-enable
RAID. Even if you have done The Right Thing previously and clobbered the
BIOS RAID meta-data at F10 install, the Intel/Lenovo docs _do_ explain
how to re-write it (and switch between RAID 0 and Raid 1, if you wish).
Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510772 for more detail.
At that point, F11 anaconda sees only the BIOS RAID and happily
proceeds with the install, and I'm able to restore my stuff from backups.
I foolishly forgot to do before after benchmarks, but it feels at
least as responsive as F10 with mdraid and, to me, is intellectually
more satisfying.
YMMV,
Joe
--
If I can save you any time, give it to me, I'll keep it with mine.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines