Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-27 Thread Gordon Messmer
There's plenty of advocacy for Postfix and Dovecot on this list; I 
occasionally like to chime in with a bit for Courier MTA:

http://www.courier-mta.org/

Among the advantages I appreciate:
* Maildrop is much easier to manage than procmail
* Configuration is much simpler: it's substantially similar to the 
highly regarded Qmail
* The entire system is a single integrated package, so you only have to 
configure things like authentication once rather than for each server 
(as in postfix and dovecot).
* Courier supports an SMTP filtering API that's much simpler than either 
Postfix or Sendmail.  I wrote courier-pythonfilter to help email admins 
filter and modify messages using Python. ;)


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-27 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:21:42 -0800
Gordon Messmer wrote:

 * The entire system is a single integrated package, so you only have to 
 configure things like authentication once rather than for each server 
 (as in postfix and dovecot).

Actually, I just setup postfix and dovecot on my system, and you
can tell postfix Hey Postfix! Go use the dovecot authentication
module., so it wasn't particularly difficult to get both postfix
and dovecot to do identical authentication.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-26 Thread Bryan Hepworth

Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:04 +0200, Leon Vergottini wrote:
  

Hi

I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first 
quarter of next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work 
that plays and have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, 
I am on a research spree.  I have already had a look at the following sites:


The Linux document project
How to forge
Flurdy.com

I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice, 
however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet 
that may help me in this regard.


Thank you very much

Regards
Leon



Leon,

Setting up a mail server is a great way to understand many aspects of
the internet.  I was elected in our firm to do the same thing.  It took
me two years and lots of study, but it was more than worthwhile.

Lots of others have given you advice and I concur with their advice to
use Centos 5.2 ... very stable

I have used sendmail as the MTA  It is easy to configure it to transfer
mail to a 'smart host' from a desktop.  It gets harder the more pieces
of it you choose to use.  Make sure you get the 'bat book' Sendmail!!!

In my opinion sendmail works much better when you use bind to have a
local dns server.  You can use sendmail without bind, but you have to
deal with sendmail having difficulty being able to identify your
internal machines from remote machine.  One of the other posters has
advised you to be careful of allowing unwanted relay privileges granted
to outside machines.  Make sure you study this subject well.

dovecot has been recommend and I have used it frequently with ease.  I
have not had the opportunity to install cyrus.  Make sure you understand
the difference between POP3 and IMAP.

procmail needs to be understood

spamassassin is great, and you will need to make sure you know how to
use a spam filter.

clamav is better, and I have used it as a sendmail milter and within
procmail.  The milter works better.

My advice is for you to start with a small steps, and do not give up.
You will feel like giving up but don't.  Make sure you get the 'bat
book'.

Good Luck!!!

Greg

  

Leon

I'd echo what Greg said.

I've used sendmail and postfix - sendmail was my first foray into email 
and served me very well. The bat book as pointed out is a must, it helps 
you understand how things  fit together and was my reference when I 
started ~ 2000/2001. That mailserver was retired last year and postfix 
took it's place. Looking back on the past year there haven't really been 
any showstoppers. Mail goes into maildirs now which does help. There's 
an oreilly postfix book that I bought to give me a leg up on the 
changes. Dovecot works well for us from the client picking up email 
aspect. cacert.org also does free certificates which you might want to 
look into.


Whatever you choose it's well worth the effort for reliable mail 
services - I've never looked back since changing the Windows box all 
those years ago which was anything but reliable!


I did document out all the changes I made along the way. There was a 
couple of people on the RedHat lists that were good on email questions. 
I guess just ask specifics once you get going.


Bryan

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-26 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
 spamassassin is great, and you will need to make sure you know how to
 use a spam filter.

 clamav is better, and I have used it as a sendmail milter and within
 procmail.  The milter works better.

Clamav and spamassassin have different goals. There is some overlap,
but it doesn't make sense to say that one is *better* than the other.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-26 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 11:10 +1930, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
  spamassassin is great, and you will need to make sure you know how to
  use a spam filter.
 
  clamav is better, and I have used it as a sendmail milter and within
  procmail.  The milter works better.
 
 Clamav and spamassassin have different goals. There is some overlap,
 but it doesn't make sense to say that one is *better* than the other.
 
 poc
 

Poc,

Let me revise what I have said.

spamassassin is great, but is not a total solution to block spam; I have
not found anything better to block spam.

clamav is also great, and is nearly a total solution to filter e-mails
that are infested with virus.  

spam filtering is a different problem and ends up being a bigger problem
than virus filtering because the solution is not as complete.

Greg

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-25 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:04 +0200, Leon Vergottini wrote:
 Hi
 
 I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first 
 quarter of next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work 
 that plays and have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, 
 I am on a research spree.  I have already had a look at the following sites:
 
 The Linux document project
 How to forge
 Flurdy.com
 
 I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice, 
 however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet 
 that may help me in this regard.
 
 Thank you very much
 
 Regards
 Leon

Leon,

Setting up a mail server is a great way to understand many aspects of
the internet.  I was elected in our firm to do the same thing.  It took
me two years and lots of study, but it was more than worthwhile.

Lots of others have given you advice and I concur with their advice to
use Centos 5.2 ... very stable

I have used sendmail as the MTA  It is easy to configure it to transfer
mail to a 'smart host' from a desktop.  It gets harder the more pieces
of it you choose to use.  Make sure you get the 'bat book' Sendmail!!!

In my opinion sendmail works much better when you use bind to have a
local dns server.  You can use sendmail without bind, but you have to
deal with sendmail having difficulty being able to identify your
internal machines from remote machine.  One of the other posters has
advised you to be careful of allowing unwanted relay privileges granted
to outside machines.  Make sure you study this subject well.

dovecot has been recommend and I have used it frequently with ease.  I
have not had the opportunity to install cyrus.  Make sure you understand
the difference between POP3 and IMAP.

procmail needs to be understood

spamassassin is great, and you will need to make sure you know how to
use a spam filter.

clamav is better, and I have used it as a sendmail milter and within
procmail.  The milter works better.

My advice is for you to start with a small steps, and do not give up.
You will feel like giving up but don't.  Make sure you get the 'bat
book'.

Good Luck!!!

Greg

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-25 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:15:22 -0600
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

 I have used sendmail as the MTA  It is easy to configure it to transfer
 mail to a 'smart host' from a desktop.  It gets harder the more pieces
 of it you choose to use.  Make sure you get the 'bat book' Sendmail!!!

Careful, anyone saying sendmail is easy to configure may find
mental health workers closing in on them with a straight jacket :-).

I find postfix plenty confusing, but far simpler to deal with
than sendmail.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-25 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Thu, 2008-12-25 at 22:34 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
 On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:15:22 -0600
 Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
 
  I have used sendmail as the MTA  It is easy to configure it to transfer
  mail to a 'smart host' from a desktop.  It gets harder the more pieces
  of it you choose to use.  Make sure you get the 'bat book' Sendmail!!!
 
 Careful, anyone saying sendmail is easy to configure may find
 mental health workers closing in on them with a straight jacket :-).
 
 I find postfix plenty confusing, but far simpler to deal with
 than sendmail.
 

It did take me two years, and sometimes I needed a straight jacket for
myself. I still don't pretend to know everything sendmail does, but it
finally became easy to use.  :)  

I have not had the time or need to use postfix, but I hear it works
without the use of pharmacological products for the mail administrator.
You are probably right :)

Greg

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-25 Thread homburg
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:34:18 -0500
Tom Horsley tom.hors...@att.net wrote:

 
 I find postfix plenty confusing, but far simpler to deal
 with than sendmail.
 
I agree. It's also far less expensive and faster.

Until you have to deal with Weitse and the mailing list
group that is ;-)  Sometimes is seems that the singular
compelling purpose for the group's existence is to diminish
the size of one's ego.

-- 
Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda
http://www.tips-Q.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-24 Thread Stuart

On 14/12/08 20:47, homb...@tips-q.com wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:04:16 +0200

[...]

a) CentOS, not Fedora


agreed


b) Postfix is probably the easiest MTA to configure.


Also agreed, but he default postfix config shipped in Fedora, RHEL (and 
as a result almost certainly) CentOS is retarded... be careful with 
security settings. Most of the HOWTOs seem to cover this.




c) The default imap/pop3 server (dovecot) is sufficient for
up to a few hundred users.


Is there any particular evidence you have to support this?
AFAIK dovecot scales to 100,000+ users (at the very least)


d) Test, test and test again before you go live. Pay
particular attention to preventing an open relay.



Stuart

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Leon Vergottini

Hi

I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first 
quarter of next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work 
that plays and have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, 
I am on a research spree.  I have already had a look at the following sites:


The Linux document project
How to forge
Flurdy.com

I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice, 
however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet 
that may help me in this regard.


Thank you very much

Regards
Leon

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Mauriat
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Leon Vergottini
leon.vergott...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first quarter of
 next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work that plays and
 have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, I am on a research
 spree.  I have already had a look at the following sites:

 The Linux document project
 How to forge
 Flurdy.com

 I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice,
 however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet that
 may help me in this regard.

 Thank you very much

 Regards
 Leon

If your intention is only for a dedicated email server, I would highly
recommend CentOS 5.2.
CentOS is intended for enterprise, it is reliable, stable and has a
very long support cycle.

http://www.centos.org
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-49a3d6a9a0c95cff0676b0209eae985780e41678
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=41
http://www.linuxmail.info/mail-server-setup-centos-5/

There are many other resources on the web using CentOS for all sorts
of server related functions.

-Mauriat

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Steve Searle
Around 05:04pm on Sunday, December 14, 2008 (UK time), Leon Vergottini scrawled:

 I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first 
 quarter of next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work 

I don't know if you are intending to use Fedora as the server.  If you
are I would advise against it because of the frequency of upgrades you
will need to do to keep up with security updates.

If you are familiar with Fedora then I would advice a similar distro
that does have a much longer supported lifetime, such as CentOS.

Steve

-- 
 
(o www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_No MS products were used in the creation of this message

 17:26:31 up  1:54,  1 user,  load average: 0.10, 0.07, 0.02


pgp6eaBeZrkNV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:04:16 +0200
Leon Vergottini wrote:

 I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice, 
 however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet 
 that may help me in this regard.

(a) Use Centos, not Fedora, for this project.

(b) Complete step-by-step instructions can be found here:
http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
DRY CLEANER BUSINESS FOR SALE ~ http://www.canadadrycleanerforsale.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Robert L Cochran


Mauriat wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Leon Vergottini
 leon.vergott...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 Hi

 I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first quarter of
 next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work that plays and
 have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, I am on a research
 spree.  I have already had a look at the following sites:

 The Linux document project
 How to forge
 Flurdy.com

 I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice,
 however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet that
 may help me in this regard.

 Thank you very much

 Regards
 Leon
 

 If your intention is only for a dedicated email server, I would highly
 recommend CentOS 5.2.
 CentOS is intended for enterprise, it is reliable, stable and has a
 very long support cycle.

 http://www.centos.org
 http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-49a3d6a9a0c95cff0676b0209eae985780e41678
 http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=41
 http://www.linuxmail.info/mail-server-setup-centos-5/

 There are many other resources on the web using CentOS for all sorts
 of server related functions.

 -Mauriat

   
I think you should use CentOS as well. Setting up an email server (and
modifying the associated DNS) is not that hard all by itself. The hard
part is you will need to cope with floods of spam emails some of which
contain viruses. I recommend you virus check all incoming emails and
quarantine and ultimately delete infected mails before they get to the
recipients.

Bob Cochran

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: E-mail Server

2008-12-14 Thread Les Mikesell

Leon Vergottini wrote:

Hi

I have been tasked to commissioned an e-mail server  in the first 
quarter of next year.  I got this task because I am the only one at work 
that plays and have a small bit of understanding of how Linux work.  So, 
I am on a research spree.  I have already had a look at the following 
sites:


The Linux document project
How to forge
Flurdy.com

I do not ask for step by step instructions, although it will be nice, 
however I ask that you guys will point me to resources on the internet 
that may help me in this regard.


If you want something appliance-like where you just add users and 
everything works, look at SME server from

http://wiki.contribs.org/Main_Page.

It is mostly based on Centos (as others have suggested for stability) 
but modified so all administration is through a simple web interface. It 
can also provide many other services but it would be reasonable to 
deploy strictly as a mail server if you want.


--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikes...@gmail.com

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines