Icecast RPM question

2009-01-19 Thread Seann Clark

All,

   I do not know who the maintainer of the icecast RPM for Fedora is, 
but I found some things that have been very odd since I installed Fedora 
9. The solution to this is rather simple though, but here is the problem:


I install icecast off of yum:
yum install icecast

Everything installs, and everything looks good... until I load icecast. 
Then the strangest thing happens, it just doesn't bind to the proper ports:


tcp0  0 127.0.0.1:50347 
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  14950/icecast
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:47123   
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  14950/icecast
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:37591   
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  14950/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.9:38523  
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  14950/icecast



now mind you, the only binding on the system for icecast is:
   listen-socket
   port8000/port
   bind-address192.168.10.9/bind-address
   /listen-socket
   listen-socket
   port8000/port
   bind-address127.0.0.1/bind-address
   /listen-socket


on my working system(the xml was copied strait between the 'dead' system 
and the working one, with just an IP address change, from the .2 to the 
.9 address) The .2 is the main server, and as a test example, off the .9 
box, I installed icecast, which is version 2.3.1. I saw the same 
problems when I installed icecast from rpm on the .2 box. this working 
version is 2.3.2 built from source:


tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  4609/icecast
tcp0  0 127.0.0.1:8000  
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  4609/icecast
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:8015
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  4609/icecast
tcp0  0 0.0.0.0:8016
0.0.0.0:*   LISTEN  4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:46062  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:52417  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:46060  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:38873  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:52419  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast
tcp0  0 192.168.10.2:8000   
192.168.10.2:35130  ESTABLISHED 4609/icecast




I had tagged the problem on the icecast mailing list, and after doing a 
custom compile got this working when I installed Fedora on this new box. 
The thread can be found at: 
http://www.archivum.info/icec...@xiph.org/2008-07/msg8.html



Now, The hardware/Arch info for the two servers

192.168.10.2
86_64
4GB memory

192.168.10.9
i586
2GB memory


From the yum install dialogue:


Package Arch 
Version  Repository  Size


Installing:
icecast i386 
2.3.1-5.fc9  fedora 317 k


Transaction Summary



So it is the right arch as well.


Building this from source for the 2.3.2 build worked fine.


Regards,
Seann



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Icecast RPM question

2009-01-19 Thread Jonathan Underwood
2009/1/19 Seann Clark nombran...@tsukinokage.net:
 All,

   I do not know who the maintainer of the icecast RPM for Fedora is, but I
 found some things that have been very odd since I installed Fedora 9. The
 solution to this is rather simple though, but here is the problem:
[snip]

Seann, you'd be far better off putting all that detail in a bugzilla
report at http://bugzilla.redhat.com, and then the paclage maintainer
will see it, and (hopefully) fix the Fedora packages.

J.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines