Old updates
Hi, are old updates kept somewhere? I want to track down the precise update that broke something but the repos contain only recent versions of the packages. If the previous updates are not available, what's the recommended method in such case? (Preferably some that does not involve repackaging the universe on my machine.) Thanks, Yeti -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Old updates
David Nečas wrote: Hi, are old updates kept somewhere? I want to track down the precise update that broke something but the repos contain only recent versions of the packages. If the previous updates are not available, what's the recommended method in such case? (Preferably some that does not involve repackaging the universe on my machine.) Thanks, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Regards, Bryn. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:52 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d On mine the old one is still there. Are you sure? Check the time stamp on the files. Yeah,, I am sure , but I think it was because of the screwey way I performed the transisiton. I also have a: fedora-updates.repo.rpmnew which I think corresponds to the new: fedora-updates.repo you are seeing. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234 2008-05-18 21:42 dvd.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1907 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-development.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1168 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1186 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1078 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1259 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1151 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1904 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-devel.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1808 2007-11-07 10:11 livna.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2003 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-testing.repo Mikkel -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- === It's NO USE ... I've gone to CLUB MED!! === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Friday 12 September 2008 15:06:31 Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:52 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d On mine the old one is still there. Are you sure? Check the time stamp on the files. Yeah,, I am sure , but I think it was because of the screwey way I performed the transisiton. I also have a: fedora-updates.repo.rpmnew which I think corresponds to the new: fedora-updates.repo you are seeing. If you previously edited your fedora.repo or fedora-updates.repo or fedora-testing.repo then the update will create a x.rpmnew version of these files rather than replacing them wih the new versions. Tony -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234 2008-05-18 21:42 dvd.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1907 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-development.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1168 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1186 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1078 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1259 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1151 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1904 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-devel.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1808 2007-11-07 10:11 livna.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2003 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-testing.repo Mikkel -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- === It's NO USE ... I've gone to CLUB MED!! === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Should I disable the old updates repo?
The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. -- Brian Millett - [ Delenn and Sinclair, The Gathering] Why Babylon 5? If the prior four stations were lost or destroyed, why build another? 'Plain old human stubbornness I guess. When something we value is destroyed, we rebuild it. If its destroyed again, we rebuild it again...and again and again and...again. Until it stays. That as our poet Tennison once said is the goal: to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.' signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. -- === The advertisement is the most truthful part of a newspaper. -- Thomas Jefferson === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work. poc Did you edit your (old) repo files? You are only supposed to get .rpmnew for config files you have changed... (Or .rpmsave if hte old config file does not work with the new version...) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work. If you have edited the files by hand, rpm updates won't overwrite the configuration files usually and instead create .rpmnew files which gives the user a chance to manually review and adopt the changes. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 20:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work. If you have edited the files by hand, rpm updates won't overwrite the configuration files usually and instead create .rpmnew files which gives the user a chance to manually review and adopt the changes. I realize that, I wasn't complaining :-) poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
Mikkel L. Ellertson escribío: Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d I updated using yum update and some repo files were left untouched while .rpmnew versions appeared in /etc/yum.repo.d. I moved them into place by hand (having backed up the old ones of course). Seemed to work. poc Did you edit your (old) repo files? You are only supposed to get .rpmnew for config files you have changed... (Or .rpmsave if hte old config file does not work with the new version...) Mikkel Not those. I had the fedora.repo. What I got instead was two new ones fedora-updates-newkey.repo fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo I just deleted the older fedora-updates.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo Thanks for all help. -- Brian Millett - [ Ivanova (re: Kosh's ship), Hunter, Prey] You can see why we've had to quarantine this whole area. The last maintenance crew we had in here wouldn't come back. They kept having dreams about this thing. They said it talked to them in their sleep. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d On mine the old one is still there. -- === In my opinion, Richard Stallman wouldn't recognise terrorism if it came up and bit him on his Internet. -- Ross M. Greenberg === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Should I disable the old updates repo?
Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: Aaron Konstam wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: The old fedora-updates.repo ?? After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and that's what its all about. I'm happy. But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is still active. Should that repo be deactivated? Thanks team for a job well done. Seems like the thing to do. On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of the files in /etc/yum.repos.d On mine the old one is still there. Are you sure? Check the time stamp on the files. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 234 2008-05-18 21:42 dvd.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1907 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-development.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1168 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1186 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1078 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1259 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1151 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1904 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-devel.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1808 2007-11-07 10:11 livna.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2003 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-testing.repo Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
