Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
On 29/07/08 05:42, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Verily I say unto thee, that Keith G. Robertson-Turner spake thusly: Meanwhile I recommend you simply remove klamav and try again, until I rebuild it and publish it to the repo (hopefully in the next hour or so). Klamav (KDE GUI for clamav) is now in the repo: http://rpm.slated.org/fedora/7/i386/repoview/klamav.html Thanks, installs fine. -- Erik. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
Verily I say unto thee, that Keith G. Robertson-Turner spake thusly: > Meanwhile I recommend you simply remove klamav and try again, until I > rebuild it and publish it to the repo (hopefully in the next hour or > so). Klamav (KDE GUI for clamav) is now in the repo: http://rpm.slated.org/fedora/7/i386/repoview/klamav.html -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
Verily I say unto thee, that Erik P. Olsen spake thusly: > On my Fedora 7 system I get from yum update clamav: > Error: Missing Dependency: libclamav.so.3 is needed by package klamav > I do indeed have libclamav.so.3 so what is wrong? The error message is misleading. It doesn't mean that you currently have a missing dependency, it means that you /will/ have a missing dependency if you update that library. IMHO that error message should be changed to read something like: "Dependency conflict: .so.x is set to be removed and updated by .so.y, but package foobar needs .so.x, and no suitable update candidate is available for foobar". Meanwhile I recommend you simply remove klamav and try again, until I rebuild it and publish it to the repo (hopefully in the next hour or so). If anyone knows of any other dependants, let me know, and I'll add them to my todo list. -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
On 28/07/08 04:09, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly: Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Thanks. I've disabled unrar support, rebuilt and published (now available for F7-i386 too): http://rpm.slated.org On my Fedora 7 system I get from yum update clamav: Error: Missing Dependency: libclamav.so.3 is needed by package klamav I do indeed have libclamav.so.3 so what is wrong? -- Erik. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly: > Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: >> Also I'm still investigating the legality of building unrar against >> GPL sources. I think this is not a question of whether the author >> gives his permission to distribute freeware, but more a question of >> whether GPL software can be linked to proprietary software. > > Unrar support is a copyright infringement. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334371 Thanks. I've disabled unrar support, rebuilt and published (now available for F7-i386 too): http://rpm.slated.org -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Also I'm still investigating the legality of building unrar against GPL sources. I think this is not a question of whether the author gives his permission to distribute freeware, but more a question of whether GPL software can be linked to proprietary software. Unrar support is a copyright infringement. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334371 Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
Verily I say unto thee, that Erik P. Olsen spake thusly: > On 27/07/08 03:53, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: >> Verily I say unto thee, that Bob Marcan spake thusly: >> (Original subject: clamav 0.93 on Fedora 8) >> >>> Will this ever happen ? >> >> For some reason the Fedora 8 packages for ClamAV are lagging behind >> F9, so I've provided updates for the following architectures, based >> on the Fedora 9 SRPM: > > Can it be used for Fedora 7 as well? I have an F7 box here, so I'll rebuild and test later. I should really be using mach/mock, but I'm a bit disorganised ATM :) Also I'm still investigating the legality of building unrar against GPL sources. I think this is not a question of whether the author gives his permission to distribute freeware, but more a question of whether GPL software can be linked to proprietary software. If it is actually linked rather than a separate binary, then I don't think it's legal, and even then I'm not sure if they can be distributed in an RPM package together. Just to be safe, I'm going to disable unrar support and rebuild. -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8
On 27/07/08 03:53, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Verily I say unto thee, that Bob Marcan spake thusly: (Original subject: clamav 0.93 on Fedora 8) Will this ever happen ? For some reason the Fedora 8 packages for ClamAV are lagging behind F9, so I've provided updates for the following architectures, based on the Fedora 9 SRPM: Can it be used for Fedora 7 as well? -- Erik. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
