Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Bill Davidsen wrote: As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. Got me back in business. Thanks John Brier -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:19 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. This works fine for me except on the box running the 64 bit FC9. Then I get: Looks like the x86-64 repos are either messaged up (I see you have the out of date repomod.xml issue I see of x86-32bit), but it looks like you have both livna and rpmfusions stuff enabled by default, so you may have a total mishmash of conflicting packages from various places. Can't help with that issue at all, works for x86 using Fedora repos. [88] /home/magnusg $ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit livna| 2.1 kB 00:00 fedora | 2.4 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 2.7 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates| 2.7 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-free | 951 B 00:00 updates-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Wed Dec 10 22:27:31 2008 Downloaded: Tue Dec 2 16:12:33 2008 updates-testing-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree| 951 B 00:00 updates | 2.6 kB 00:00 Setting up Upgrade Process No Packages marked for Update and still get error messages when starting NFS while booting: NFS statdFAILED mounting NFS filesystems: mount.nfs internal error mount.nfs internal error FAILED -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:59 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Looks like the x86-64 repos are either messaged up (I see you have the out of date repomod.xml issue I see of x86-32bit), but it looks like you have both livna and rpmfusions stuff enabled by default, so you may have a total mishmash of conflicting packages from various places. You can have both livna and rpmfusion enabled; the only real package available in livna is libdecss[1]. [1] http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/9/x86_64/00_PLEASE_READ.txt --Caitlyn -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Where did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Bill Davidsen wrote: I get messages indicating NFS statd failed and messsages says it can't register. Is this caused by the dbus fix or ??? /quote] Last night, after updating for the first time in awhile (because of the dbus issues), I had this exact same problemm as Bill. I upgraded from kernel 2.6.27.5-41.fc9.x86_64 to 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64. I get the message Starting NFS statd: [Failed] from the Fedora splash screen during boot up. It automatically switches to the Show Details option just in time to display the NFS error message. I rebooted to the old kernel, and, as expected, no error message appeared. Then, I rebooted to the old kernel again, but this time I manually selected Show Details. I was surprised to see the NFS error message! In other words, the old kernel was also failing to get NFS started, but the error message was surpressed, and ignorance was bliss! It seems to me that there are 3 possible explanations: 1. The NFS problem had been there for who knows how long, but the update I made last night forced the error messages to be displayed during boot up. 2. The updated kernel somehow broke NFS in the old kernel. I'm not a developer, but this seems unlikely although possible. 3. Some other non-kernel part of the updates generally broke NFS across the board. Any ideas? -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=311650topic_id=65349forum=10#forumpost311650 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame parmini...@netzero.net. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - SElinux issue
Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: I get messages indicating NFS statd failed and messsages says it can't register. Is this caused by the dbus fix or ??? More later, I wasn't planning on taking a drive in an ice storm tonight, but I may yet. No, dbus and nfs are not linked. Refer to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448898 You should probably comment on that bug or open a new one. Looks to be a bit different, I'll have to poke a bit before I can offer a decent bug report, but rpc.statd isn't starting, which makes all of my NFS mounts fail. I checked against another system which works, the permissions (-lZ) are the same, so it doesn't appear to be a simple thing like owner, permissions, or attributed. Another SElinux issue, the rpcbind application is not expected to setgid, so SElinux prevents it. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Steve Searle st...@stevesearle.com To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 12:23 PM I have got exactly the same situation, with rpcbind not starting and NFS mounts failing. Switiching selinux to permissive has resolved the problem, however relabelin and switching back to enforcing has returned the problem. I'd file a bug. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Steve Searle wrote: I have got exactly the same situation, with rpcbind not starting and NFS mounts failing. Switiching selinux to permissive has resolved the problem, however relabelin and switching back to enforcing has returned the problem. The new rpcbind and the current selinux-policy packages are incompatible. I suggest you downgrade rpcbind, or wait until the selinux update appears. Michael Young -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
M A Young wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Steve Searle wrote: I have got exactly the same situation, with rpcbind not starting and NFS mounts failing. Switiching selinux to permissive has resolved the problem, however relabelin and switching back to enforcing has returned the problem. The new rpcbind and the current selinux-policy packages are incompatible. I suggest you downgrade rpcbind, or wait until the selinux update appears. I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. I have suggested holding things in updates-testing until some users actually test them, there is very little good in having a testing repository if it's just a name and not a QA step. These are not subtle errors, something flat out doesn't work. Perhaps that level of QA could be automated. Failure to boot, or enable network, or big warning messages in the system logs are pretty visible. Consider this a suggestion with a slight hint of complaint. ;-) -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Bill Davidsen wrote: I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. Maybe as more people run Fedora with SElinux enabled there will be an increasing amount of testing in that mode. However I have a feeling that the percentage of boxes running SElinux enforcing must be quite low at the moment, as many people switch it off soon after an install as they can't be bothered to fix SElinux related issues that arise. But now that SElinux is on by default in the past year and targeted policy is getting ever more tuned towards having things just work take up might increase over the next year or so as more people accept it after installing newer versions of Fedora. There does seem to be an increasing number of SElinux related requests for help in recent months which may indicate that this is the case - anyone have any statistics on this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FC9---recent-upgrade-breaks-NFS-tp20968136p20982819.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: I get messages indicating NFS statd failed and messsages says it can't register. Is this caused by the dbus fix or ??? i dont think nfs uses dbus. I'd have to check that however. -jef -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Bill Davidsen wrote: I get messages indicating NFS statd failed and messsages says it can't register. Is this caused by the dbus fix or ??? More later, I wasn't planning on taking a drive in an ice storm tonight, but I may yet. No, dbus and nfs are not linked. Refer to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448898 You should probably comment on that bug or open a new one. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
Michael Cronenworth wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: I get messages indicating NFS statd failed and messsages says it can't register. Is this caused by the dbus fix or ??? More later, I wasn't planning on taking a drive in an ice storm tonight, but I may yet. No, dbus and nfs are not linked. Refer to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448898 You should probably comment on that bug or open a new one. Looks to be a bit different, I'll have to poke a bit before I can offer a decent bug report, but rpc.statd isn't starting, which makes all of my NFS mounts fail. I checked against another system which works, the permissions (-lZ) are the same, so it doesn't appear to be a simple thing like owner, permissions, or attributed. The pertinent log is attached, I'll chase this when I can, we're having an ice storm. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max) Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost kernel: CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT is deprecated and will be removed soon. Plase us e Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost kernel: nf_conntrack.acct=1 kernel paramater, acct=1 nf_conntrack module o ption or Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost kernel: sysctl net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_acct=1 to enable it. Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost rsyslogd: [origin software=rsyslogd swVersion=3.18.1 x-pid=2193 x-in fo=http://www.rsyslog.com;] restart Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost rpcbind: setgid to 'rpc' (32) failed: Operation not permitted Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost rpc.statd[2231]: Version 1.1.2 Starting Dec 11 23:25:03 localhost rpc.statd[2231]: unable to register (statd, 1, udp). Dec 11 23:25:05 localhost kernel: RPC: Registered udp transport module. Dec 11 23:25:05 localhost kernel: RPC: Registered tcp transport module. Dec 11 23:25:06 localhost kernel: warning: `dbus-daemon' uses deprecated v2 capabilities in a way th at may be insecure. Dec 11 23:25:06 localhost kernel: fuse init (API version 7.9) Dec 11 23:25:06 localhost pcscd: pcscdaemon.c:507:main() pcsc-lite 1.4.4 daemon ready. Dec 11 23:25:06 localhost acpid: starting up -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
