Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Bill Davidsen wrote: As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. Got me back in business. Thanks John Brier -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:19 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. This works fine for me except on the box running the 64 bit FC9. Then I get: Looks like the x86-64 repos are either messaged up (I see you have the out of date repomod.xml issue I see of x86-32bit), but it looks like you have both livna and rpmfusions stuff enabled by default, so you may have a total mishmash of conflicting packages from various places. Can't help with that issue at all, works for x86 using Fedora repos. [88] /home/magnusg $ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit livna| 2.1 kB 00:00 fedora | 2.4 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-free-updates | 2.7 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates| 2.7 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-free | 951 B 00:00 updates-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Wed Dec 10 22:27:31 2008 Downloaded: Tue Dec 2 16:12:33 2008 updates-testing-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 rpmfusion-nonfree| 951 B 00:00 updates | 2.6 kB 00:00 Setting up Upgrade Process No Packages marked for Update and still get error messages when starting NFS while booting: NFS statdFAILED mounting NFS filesystems: mount.nfs internal error mount.nfs internal error FAILED -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 19:59 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Looks like the x86-64 repos are either messaged up (I see you have the out of date repomod.xml issue I see of x86-32bit), but it looks like you have both livna and rpmfusions stuff enabled by default, so you may have a total mishmash of conflicting packages from various places. You can have both livna and rpmfusion enabled; the only real package available in livna is libdecss[1]. [1] http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/9/x86_64/00_PLEASE_READ.txt --Caitlyn -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Where did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Gerhard Magnus wrote: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by and targeted? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-* That will install selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm and possibly, if you have it installed, selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm Now your system works again for NFS. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX
Michael Cronenworth wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS From: Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, but at least three required policy changes. You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs with SELinux. ;) Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable. Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues. FIX!! I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind started without issues. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
