Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-21 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
 Marcel Rieux wrote:
  mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs
 [...]
 All references at Google's, only 9 of them, say mount a. How come
 it's not mount -a

 a is the device containing the filesystem. For this kind of filesystem
 it is unused so you can put everything there (the same happens for tmpfs,
 proc, sysfs, devpts).

    1. Manually mount after each boot:

       % mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug

 In this case the second debugfs could have been a or whatever
 else.

I see. Thanks!

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-20 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 12/19/2009 05:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com  wrote:
   

I installed it about 2 days ago but it seems the upgrade to F12
destroyed the yum.log without making any back-up.
 

BTW, I'm not talking about iotop.
   


blktrace?

# yum install blktrace
# mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs
# btrace

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-20 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
 On 12/19/2009 05:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com  wrote:


 I installed it about 2 days ago but it seems the upgrade to F12
 destroyed the yum.log without making any back-up.


 BTW, I'm not talking about iotop.


 blktrace?

Yes.

 # yum install blktrace
 # mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs
 # btrace


I see no allusion to:

 mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs

in the man page. What is it for?

OTOH, without it:

btrace /dev/sda
Invalid debug path /sys/kernel/debug: 0/Success

All references at Google's, only 9 of them, say mount a. How come
it's not mount -a

Here's another suggestion:

Mounting the debugfs file system

blktrace utilizes files under the debug file system, and thus must
have the mount point set up - mounted on the directory
/sys/kernel/debug. To do this one may do either of the following:

   1. Manually mount after each boot:

  % mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug

   2. Add an entry into /etc/fstab, and have it done automatically at
each boot1:

  debug /sys/kernel/debug debugfs default 0 0

http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~aaronc/iosched/doc/blktrace.html

Why isn't this line always in /etc/fstab? Is there any security risk?

And, err... in the end, if one's purpose is only to monitor a disk
i/o, isn't iotop as good a solution?

Excuse all the questions. I'm trying to learn more about your suggestion.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-20 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Marcel Rieux wrote:
  mount a /sys/kernel/debug -t debugfs
[...]
 All references at Google's, only 9 of them, say mount a. How come
 it's not mount -a

a is the device containing the filesystem. For this kind of filesystem
it is unused so you can put everything there (the same happens for tmpfs,
proc, sysfs, devpts).

1. Manually mount after each boot:
 
   % mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug

In this case the second debugfs could have been a or whatever
else.


-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-19 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcel Rieux m.z.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
 I installed it about 2 days ago but it seems the upgrade to F12
 destroyed the yum.log without making any back-up.

BTW, I'm not talking about iotop.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-19 Thread William Witt

On 12/19/2009 06:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com  wrote:

I installed it about 2 days ago but it seems the upgrade to F12
destroyed the yum.log without making any back-up.


BTW, I'm not talking about iotop.


You are probably looking for atop.

Will

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: What's that utility to monitor disk i/o again?

2009-12-19 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:59 PM, William Witt will...@witt-family.net wrote:
 On 12/19/2009 06:54 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Marcel Rieuxm.z.ri...@gmail.com  wrote:

 I installed it about 2 days ago but it seems the upgrade to F12
 destroyed the yum.log without making any back-up.

 BTW, I'm not talking about iotop.

 You are probably looking for atop.

No.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines