Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Daniel B. Thurman


I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.

Are these speed test tools credible and can they
be trusted?

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?

Has anyone gotten download speeds any faster that
what I have reported?

What I am trying to determine is if my ISP only shows
un-throttled speeds between me  them, but then somehow
throttles my bandwidth usage when I am using the Internet,
or is it more probable that download speeds are being throttled
from the download site itself?

Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?

I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
speed improvements as far as I can tell.

Just wondering,
Dan

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Ed Greshko
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:

 I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
 connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
 what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
 website based speed test tools to determine their upload
 and download speeds.

 Are these speed test tools credible and can they
 be trusted?

 Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
 seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
 terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
 speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
 and the farther away from central, the more reduced
 is the speeds are.

 The average speed tools says that I have measured
 speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

 Why is it however, that when downloading software
 from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
 I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
 and never see anything much faster than that?

 Is this normal?
Yes, very normal

First, the download speed get from any site can only be as high as their
upload speed.

Second, run the web based speed checks from 2 or 3 different sites 
simultaneously and/or the same site multiple times simultaneously and
see what the results are then. 

Those two things should shed some light as to why it is normal.

Oh, and third, the software download sites probably also have rate
limits on each upload (from their point of view) so that everyone gets
the same level of service.

All of these reasons are the driving force behind the development of
bittorrent...

 Has anyone gotten download speeds any faster that
 what I have reported?

 What I am trying to determine is if my ISP only shows
 un-throttled speeds between me  them, but then somehow
 throttles my bandwidth usage when I am using the Internet,
 or is it more probable that download speeds are being throttled
 from the download site itself?

 Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
 site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?

 I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
 speed improvements as far as I can tell.

 Just wondering,
 Dan



-- 
Q: What's hard going in and soft and sticky coming out? A: Chewing gum.
mei-mei.gres...@greshko.com http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Ed Greshko wrote:

Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
  

I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.

Are these speed test tools credible and can they
be trusted?

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?


Yes, very normal

First, the download speed get from any site can only be as high as their
upload speed.
  

So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???  The only way to
get more speed is to increase the Upload speeds to be
more closer to the Download speeds which is always
higher?

Perhaps I should downgrade my connection speeds to
768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down since I cannot get higher
than 768KB/s Up and I am losing $$$ or am I missing
something here?

I wondered why ISPs do not offer matching Up/Down
speeds, so as to snare an ignorant dupe?

Second, run the web based speed checks from 2 or 3 different sites 
simultaneously and/or the same site multiple times simultaneously and
see what the results are then. 


Those two things should shed some light as to why it is normal.

Oh, and third, the software download sites probably also have rate
limits on each upload (from their point of view) so that everyone gets
the same level of service.

All of these reasons are the driving force behind the development of
bittorrent...
  

Has anyone gotten download speeds any faster that
what I have reported?

What I am trying to determine is if my ISP only shows
un-throttled speeds between me  them, but then somehow
throttles my bandwidth usage when I am using the Internet,
or is it more probable that download speeds are being throttled
from the download site itself?

Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?

I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
speed improvements as far as I can tell.

Just wondering,
Dan



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Chris Tyler
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
 connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
 what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
 website based speed test tools to determine their upload
 and download speeds.
 
 Are these speed test tools credible and can they
 be trusted?
 
 Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
 seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
 terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
 speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
 and the farther away from central, the more reduced
 is the speeds are.
 
 The average speed tools says that I have measured
 speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.
 
 Why is it however, that when downloading software
 from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
 I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
 and never see anything much faster than that?

Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second. There
are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

 So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
 768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
 Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
 than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???

No, if you downgraded to 768 kilobit/sec service you would expect a
maximum download speed of around 75-80 kilobytes per second.

-Chris

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


RE: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Paul Grinberg
Hi,

I'd like to suggest a tool that I am usually using to check bandwidth
speed.
It is called iperf. It does not rely on usual HTTP download (most
online checkers use it), but rather on pure TCP session bandwith. 

Your ISP maybe permits high HTTP downloads, but then throttles SSH or
ESP based traffic.

I think if you really want to measure, then you'll have to go with
iperf. 

Best,
Paul


-Original Message-
From: fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tyler
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:42 PM
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Subject: Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
 connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
 what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
 website based speed test tools to determine their upload
 and download speeds.
 
 Are these speed test tools credible and can they
 be trusted?
 
 Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
 seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
 terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
 speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
 and the farther away from central, the more reduced
 is the speeds are.
 
 The average speed tools says that I have measured
 speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.
 
 Why is it however, that when downloading software
 from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
 I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
 and never see anything much faster than that?

Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second. There
are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

 So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
 768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
 Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
 than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???

No, if you downgraded to 768 kilobit/sec service you would expect a
maximum download speed of around 75-80 kilobytes per second.

-Chris

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Chris Tyler wrote:

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
  

I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.

Are these speed test tools credible and can they
be trusted?

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?


Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second. There
are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

  

So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???



No, if you downgraded to 768 kilobit/sec service you would expect a
maximum download speed of around 75-80 kilobytes per second.

-Chris
  

Duh-Oh.  That makes more sense.  I just posted a follow up before
receiving this message and I thought I get it, but apparently I missed
the boat :P  Thanks for clarifying this!

Dan

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Paul Grinberg wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to suggest a tool that I am usually using to check bandwidth
speed.
It is called iperf. It does not rely on usual HTTP download (most
online checkers use it), but rather on pure TCP session bandwith. 


Your ISP maybe permits high HTTP downloads, but then throttles SSH or
ESP based traffic.

I think if you really want to measure, then you'll have to go with
iperf. 


Best,
Paul
  

Interesting!  Thanks for the tip!



-Original Message-
From: fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tyler
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 12:42 PM
To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora.
Subject: Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
  

I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.

Are these speed test tools credible and can they
be trusted?

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?



Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second. There
are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

  

So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???



No, if you downgraded to 768 kilobit/sec service you would expect a
maximum download speed of around 75-80 kilobytes per second.

-Chris

  


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:21 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
  First, the download speed get from any site can only be as high as
 their
  upload speed.

 So, does that mean I am wasting money by going from
 768KB/s Up / 768KB/s Down to 768KB/s Up / 3MB/s
 Down since I will never obtain download speeds faster
 than the Upload limit of 768KB/s ???  The only way to
 get more speed is to increase the Upload speeds to be
 more closer to the Download speeds which is always
 higher?

I suggest you re-read what Ed said, which isn't what you seem to have
understood. Think of it this way: your download is the server's upload.
the maximum bandwidth you can get out of the connection between them is
the lower of these two numbers.

However there are multiple other factors:

* The server usually isn't just serving you, so it's upload speed is
shared among the multiple clients it typically has at a given time.

* You may be using your download link for several other things that you
might not even be aware of, e.g. mail updating, browser page reloads, or
even other parallel downloads (not forgetting other machines on your
local net which share your ISP connection).

* The intermediate connections on the net also have resource
limitations. If one of these is congested, you'll see lower speeds. This
is often the reason for discrepancies between the measured speed of near
and far speed testing sites.

* If some connections are unreliable, packets will be retransmitted,
leading to a lower aggregate speed.

* Your link speed (what your ISP sells you) is -- in the best case --
the speed of bits over the wire. Even if they actually give you those
speeds (and there are several reasons why they might not), actual
downloads also have several levels of protocol overhead, so your
end-to-end data transfer will always be less than the rated speed of the
connection, even if all other factors have no effect.

* Lastly, downloads are almost always TCP connections. Every TCP segment
you receive has to be acknowledged by a correspond ACK going the other
way. The ACKs are small relative to the data segments, but they still
use upload bandwidth and this can affect your data throughout.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:42 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
 Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second.
 There
 are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
 10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

Actually not. Even discounting protocol overhead, a 3Mbps connection is
3 million (3x10^6) bits per second. 300KB of data is 300 kilobytes
(300x2^10) bytes.

The fact that communications and computer people have different
interpretation of kilo and mega (and giga and ...) is a source of much
confusion. In computing we're supposed to use kebi, mebi etc. (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix) for the powers of 2, but not
many do.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Les
It should also be noted that there is latency related to physical
transmission speeds, so if the upload or download does checksums and
verify handshaking, then there will be a delay of the roundtrip at the
speed of light.  Now this seems very fast to most folks, but
electronically it is measurable, and on lines of several miles in
length, it amounts to microseconds per block.  If the block size is say
4K, and you download 4M, that is 1000 blocks.  If the delay is 1usec,
the total delay added is 1ms, or nearly 5000 bytes decrease at 5Mhz.
Also there is additional overhead on normal transmissions that may not
be in place on the speed test, and the speed test probably relates the
bits/sec, which is not the same as the number of usable bytes, since the
TCP uses quite a few bytes per block to specify various things about the
transfer.  All of this slows the response for actual file transfer, in
addition to loading of the sending computer.

On the speed tests, check both local responders and remote.  I am in
California, I regularly use Irvine and a system in New York.  there is
quite a difference.

Regards,
Les H

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 23:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
 
  I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
  connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
  what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
  website based speed test tools to determine their upload
  and download speeds.
 
  Are these speed test tools credible and can they
  be trusted?
 
  Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
  seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
  terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
  speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
  and the farther away from central, the more reduced
  is the speeds are.
 
  The average speed tools says that I have measured
  speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.
 
  Why is it however, that when downloading software
  from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
  I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
  and never see anything much faster than that?
 
  Is this normal?
 Yes, very normal
 
 First, the download speed get from any site can only be as high as their
 upload speed.
 
 Second, run the web based speed checks from 2 or 3 different sites 
 simultaneously and/or the same site multiple times simultaneously and
 see what the results are then. 
 
 Those two things should shed some light as to why it is normal.
 
 Oh, and third, the software download sites probably also have rate
 limits on each upload (from their point of view) so that everyone gets
 the same level of service.
 
 All of these reasons are the driving force behind the development of
 bittorrent...
 
  Has anyone gotten download speeds any faster that
  what I have reported?
 
  What I am trying to determine is if my ISP only shows
  un-throttled speeds between me  them, but then somehow
  throttles my bandwidth usage when I am using the Internet,
  or is it more probable that download speeds are being throttled
  from the download site itself?
 
  Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
  site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?
 
  I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
  speed improvements as far as I can tell.
 
  Just wondering,
  Dan
 
 
 
 -- 
 fedora-list mailing list
 fedora-list@redhat.com
 To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 14 August 2009 18:23:41 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:42 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
  Yes. 3 megaBITs per second is just over 300 kiloBYTEs per second.
  There
  are 8 bits per byte, plus there's packet and protocol overhead, so a
  10:1 ratio between the numbers is normal.

 Actually not. Even discounting protocol overhead, a 3Mbps connection is
 3 million (3x10^6) bits per second. 300KB of data is 300 kilobytes
 (300x2^10) bytes.

I don't understand your point. However you choose the base for M and K 
prefixes, the ratio is roughly 10:1. I mean, 3 Mbits = 300 KBytes because there 
are 8 bits in a byte (or say 10 if you simplify and/or count the overhead). It 
has nothing to do with prefixes.

Besides,

   1 Ki = 2^10 = 1024 = (roughly) 10^3 = 1 K ,   and similarly
   1 Mi = 2^20 = (roughly) 10^6 = 1 M,

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix for details ;-) ...), so even 
if you mix them, 3Mbits = (roughly) 300 KiBytes, or any other combination you 
might think of. Even Gi:G is 1:1 within an 8% error. 

I would say Chris is completely correct. For the OP: don't worry, your ISP 
seems to be providing you with what you expect.

HTH, :-)
Marko


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Suvayu Ali

Hi Daniel,

Daniel B. Thurman wrote:

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?



Pardon me if this seems rather dumb or has been addressed by another 
post in the thread (I haven't gone through the whole thread), but are 
the speeds for your ISP KBps/MBps or Kbps/Mbps? Note the 
capitalized/small `B's.


If the speeds are in Kbps/Mbps, then what you get is normal. KBps/MBps 
would be Kilobytes/Megabytes whereas Kb/Mb would be Kilobits/Megabits. 
It is common practice to quote bandwidth speeds in bits rather than 
bytes. To convert between the two just divide by 8,

i.e. 2Mbps / 8 = 256KBps

--
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:25 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[...]
 I would say Chris is completely correct. For the OP: don't worry, your ISP 
 seems to be providing you with what you expect.

I didn't suggest that what the OP is seeing isn't normal to within a
reasonable margin of error. I was simply making a (pedantic) point. I
should have read Chris's post more carefully (what he says is strictly
speaking correct), but the distinction between the two meanings of K or
M is worth bearing in mind, i.e. 300KBps does *not* mean 300 kilobytes
(in the computing sense) every second, it means 300,000 bytes, which is
close but not the same. That's all.

poc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Daniel B. Thurman

Suvayu Ali wrote:

Hi Daniel,

Daniel B. Thurman wrote:

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?



Pardon me if this seems rather dumb or has been addressed by another 
post in the thread (I haven't gone through the whole thread), but are 
the speeds for your ISP KBps/MBps or Kbps/Mbps? Note the 
capitalized/small `B's.


If the speeds are in Kbps/Mbps, then what you get is normal. KBps/MBps 
would be Kilobytes/Megabytes whereas Kb/Mb would be Kilobits/Megabits. 
It is common practice to quote bandwidth speeds in bits rather than 
bytes. To convert between the two just divide by 8,

i.e. 2Mbps / 8 = 256KBps


You are correct, over the wire Internet up/down speeds are Kb/s but when
downloading via applications, i.e. via your download program, you see KB/s.

I guess my eyes got crossed somewhere when I wrote :P

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Rick Stevens

Suvayu Ali wrote:

Hi Daniel,

Daniel B. Thurman wrote:

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?



Pardon me if this seems rather dumb or has been addressed by another 
post in the thread (I haven't gone through the whole thread), but are 
the speeds for your ISP KBps/MBps or Kbps/Mbps? Note the 
capitalized/small `B's.


If the speeds are in Kbps/Mbps, then what you get is normal. KBps/MBps 
would be Kilobytes/Megabytes whereas Kb/Mb would be Kilobits/Megabits. 
It is common practice to quote bandwidth speeds in bits rather than 
bytes. To convert between the two just divide by 8,

i.e. 2Mbps / 8 = 256KBps


To clarify, a capital B is used to indicate bytes per seconds (Bps), a
lower case b to indicate bits per second (bps).  bps was also known
back in the day as the baud rate (although that's not completely
accurate).

(wistful)  I remember my 300 baud (300bps) acoustic coupler modem.
:-p

On a more serious note, some sites limit download bandwidth on each
connection made so the sites can handle more connections.  Example, if a
site has a 2Mbps connection and one person starts a download, that
person could suck the entire 2Mbps pipe, thereby blocking others from
downloading.  If the site puts in a 256Kbps limit on each connection,
they can handle eight simultaneous connections.  kernel.org does this,
for instance (I think they limit to 128Kbps).

Some sites also vary the limit.  They start out with a large limit, but
narrow it down the longer the download takes.  The idea is that if you
need a download of something small, you get it fast.  If you're
downloading a bunch of stuff, they keep squeezing down until you hit the
minimum they allow and the remainder of the download continues at that
limited rate.

These are some of the reasons things like BitTorrent were created.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer  ri...@nerd.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Millihelen, adj: The amount of beauty required to launch one ship. -
--

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Robert L Cochran
Do remember that your final throughput can be influenced by many 
factors. One that hasn't yet been covered is the type of physical wiring 
you have, the age and condition of that wiring, and whether or not it is 
twisted pair (as in unshielded twisted pair or shielded twisted pair 
Category 5e network cable. Replacing the 40+ year old phone cable 
between my Branch Exchange Protector and my DSL splitter with Cat 5e 
cable resulted in a huge improvement in the quality of the voice signal 
my wife was getting over the phone and the data throughput rate we were 
getting over DSL. I didn't do any measurements but downloads completed 
much more quickly.


Bob

On 08/14/2009 11:29 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:


I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.

Are these speed test tools credible and can they
be trusted?

Of the several sites I have tried, they all more or less
seemed to be in close agreement with one another in
terms of the bandwidth speeds, i.e. my connection
speed is quoted at 768KB/s up and 3MB/s down,
and the farther away from central, the more reduced
is the speeds are.

The average speed tools says that I have measured
speeds of 720-30 KB/s up and 2.0-5MB/s down.

Why is it however, that when downloading software
from the various Linux/M$ and other downloads sites
I am seeing on average, speeds of 200-320(max) KB/s
and never see anything much faster than that?

Is this normal?

Has anyone gotten download speeds any faster that
what I have reported?

What I am trying to determine is if my ISP only shows
un-throttled speeds between me  them, but then somehow
throttles my bandwidth usage when I am using the Internet,
or is it more probable that download speeds are being throttled
from the download site itself?

Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?

I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
speed improvements as far as I can tell.

Just wondering,
Dan



--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread john wendel

On 08/14/2009 08:29 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:


I have been testing my residential ISP/DSL-Landline
connections and wanted to make sure that I was getting
what I am paying for. Supposedly, one can use the various
website based speed test tools to determine their upload
and download speeds.


[snip]


Other than by using `speed testers', I have yet to find a download
site that pushes out more than 2-300KB/s?

I have tried HTTP, FTP  Bittorent and there is very little or no
speed improvements as far as I can tell.

Just wondering,
Dan



Just a little aside ...

If you're looking for a site that can saturate your connection, try 
newshosting.com as a usenet provider. They seem to be able to push as 
much bandwidth as you can take. They max out my 12 Mbit cable with a 
single connection, and they allow 20 connections per client. Of course, 
they aren't free.


Regards

John

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Testing upload/download bandwidth speeds for verification

2009-08-14 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:45 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 * You may be using your download link for several other things that
 you might not even be aware of, e.g. mail updating, browser page
 reloads, or even other parallel downloads (not forgetting other
 machines on your local net which share your ISP connection).

This is more important that people give it credit for.  You often want
to do more than one thing at once, even just browsing two websites at
the same time counts.

If you limit yourself, by buying a slow internet connection, you will
probably regret it when it comes to trying to do your own things while
the computer is downloading updates, and the like.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines