Check out my Facebook profile

[Naresh Kumar]

I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and 
I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join 
Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.

Thanks,
Naresh

Here's the link:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=639188707&k=ZVCTP2S2WYVM5A1AYD2XY4&r&v=2

___
This e-mail may contain promotional materials. If you do not wish to receive 
future commercial mailings from Facebook, please click on the link below. 
Facebook's offices are located at 156 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94301.
http://www.facebook.com/o.php?u=1341864489&k=e285fc

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

[JoergSimon]

Am Montag, 21. Juli 2008 12:16:39 schrieb Naresh Kumar:
> I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events
> and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to
> join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.
> Thanks,
> Naresh
> Here's the link:
> http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=639188707&k=ZVCTP2S2WYVM5A1AYD2XY4&r&v=2

Accident? ;) 

-- 
Joerg (kital) Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

[Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)]

>
> I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and
> events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you
> need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own
> profile.
Once again ? o_O

I don't know those online apps at all, but is it that hard to tell them
not to send an invitation message to all your contacts ?

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

[Kushal Das]

On Monday 21 July 2008 03:53:57 pm JoergSimon wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Juli 2008 12:16:39 schrieb Naresh Kumar:
> > I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and
> > events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you
> > need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own
> > profile. Thanks,
> > Naresh
> > Here's the link:
> > http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=639188707&k=ZVCTP2S2WYVM5A1AYD2XY4&r&v=2
>
> Accident? ;)
No, that is called spamming :p

Kushal
-- 
Fedora Ambassador, India
http://kushaldas.in
http://dgplug.org (Linux User Group of Durgapur)

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

[Naresh KN]

I am sorry, not sure how this happened, just now I noticed this. My bad!!

I am so very sorry!!

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Kushal Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Monday 21 July 2008 03:53:57 pm JoergSimon wrote:
> > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2008 12:16:39 schrieb Naresh Kumar:
> > > I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and
> > > events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you
> > > need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own
> > > profile. Thanks,
> > > Naresh
> > > Here's the link:
> > >
> http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=639188707&k=ZVCTP2S2WYVM5A1AYD2XY4&r&v=2
> >
> > Accident? ;)
> No, that is called spamming :p
>
> Kushal
> --
> Fedora Ambassador, India
> http://kushaldas.in
> http://dgplug.org (Linux User Group of Durgapur)
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

eeedora 2.0 ?

[Valent Turkovic]

Hi,
are there anybody interested in working on Eeedora? As I can see by
eeedora page (custom Fedora version for Asus eee) [1] it looks like it
is dead in the water (please corect me if I'm wrong).

I would put al of my talents to work on this project but I'm not a
coder so please point me in the right direction. I see Ubuntu doing a
much [2] more so I'm wandering it there is not engough Fedorans using
Asus eeePC or are they just happy with Xandros or Ubuntu [2] on their
Asus eees?

[1] http://eeedora.complexvalues.com/
[1b] http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora
[2] http://www.ubuntu.com/products/mobile

Cheers,
Valent.

-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Christos Bacharakis]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Valent Turkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi,
> are there anybody interested in working on Eeedora? As I can see by
> eeedora page (custom Fedora version for Asus eee) [1] it looks like it
> is dead in the water (please corect me if I'm wrong).
>
> I would put al of my talents to work on this project but I'm not a
> coder so please point me in the right direction. I see Ubuntu doing a
> much [2] more so I'm wandering it there is not engough Fedorans using
> Asus eeePC or are they just happy with Xandros or Ubuntu [2] on their
> Asus eees?
>
> [1] http://eeedora.complexvalues.com/
> [1b ]
> http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora
> [2] http://www.ubuntu.com/products/mobile
>
> Cheers,
> Valent.
>
> --
> http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
> linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
> registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
> ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>


Hello, I can help and contribute with pleasure. The only problem is that I
don't have an eeepc to work and test.
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Nicu Buculei]

Valent Turkovic wrote:

are there anybody interested in working on Eeedora? As I can see by
eeedora page (custom Fedora version for Asus eee) [1] it looks like it
is dead in the water (please corect me if I'm wrong).

I would put al of my talents to work on this project but I'm not a
coder so please point me in the right direction. I see Ubuntu doing a
much [2] more so I'm wandering it there is not engough Fedorans using
Asus eeePC or are they just happy with Xandros or Ubuntu [2] on their
Asus eees?


My guess is that more people are interested running the "normal" distro 
on that machine (for one, I would be), so maybe probably a better effort 
would be to make Fedora proper work out of the box. Also, the "eeedora 
way" may not be the "best way", on Fedora people are encouraged to work 
upstream (here upstream would be Fedora). How about having it as one of 
the Fedora spins?


On another point, there are a lot of other machines out there (currently 
at least from MSI and Acer) with about the same hardware, it is correct 
to label them as "Eee"? (note: I prospect the buy of such machine 
myself, one not made by Asus, only if they would sell around here 
something *not* pink and my intention is to run the full desktop distro 
on the thing).


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[María Leandro]

Hi, I think I can contribute also. Here at my office my boss buy a eeepc;
but have to ask if he can let me borrow his PC.

I'll tell you what about.. have a meeting with him right now :D

2008/7/22 Christos Bacharakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Valent Turkovic <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> are there anybody interested in working on Eeedora? As I can see by
>> eeedora page (custom Fedora version for Asus eee) [1] it looks like it
>> is dead in the water (please corect me if I'm wrong).
>>
>> I would put al of my talents to work on this project but I'm not a
>> coder so please point me in the right direction. I see Ubuntu doing a
>> much [2] more so I'm wandering it there is not engough Fedorans using
>> Asus eeePC or are they just happy with Xandros or Ubuntu [2] on their
>> Asus eees?
>>
>> [1] http://eeedora.complexvalues.com/
>> [1b ]
>> http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora
>> [2] http://www.ubuntu.com/products/mobile
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Valent.
>>
>> --
>> http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
>> linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
>> registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
>> ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
>> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>>
>
>
> Hello, I can help and contribute with pleasure. The only problem is that I
> don't have an eeepc to work and test.
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>



-- 
tatica
Maria Gracia Leandro
http://www.tatica.org
http://www.iseit.net
http://www.latinux.org
http://www.latinux.com
http://www.fedora-ve.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MariaLeandro
LinuxUser= 440285
GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
"Be yourself... Don't be anyone else"
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)]

As Nicu said, people are already working on this inside Fedora, instead of
creating a new distribution.

Here is a link: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EeePc

Regards,

--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Check out my Facebook profile

[Hisham Abdel-Magid]

Never mind Naresh, "accidents" like that can happen ^_^

t.c.

hisham.isam aka *himam ^_^*


On 7/21/08, Naresh KN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am sorry, not sure how this happened, just now I noticed this. My bad!!
>
> I am so very sorry!!
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Kushal Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Monday 21 July 2008 03:53:57 pm JoergSimon wrote:
>> > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2008 12:16:39 schrieb Naresh Kumar:
>> > > I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and
>> > > events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you
>> > > need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own
>> > > profile. Thanks,
>> > > Naresh
>> > > Here's the link:
>> > >
>> http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=639188707&k=ZVCTP2S2WYVM5A1AYD2XY4&r&v=2
>> >
>> > Accident? ;)
>>
>> No, that is called spamming :p
>>
>> Kushal
>> --
>> Fedora Ambassador, India
>> http://kushaldas.in
>> http://dgplug.org (Linux User Group of Durgapur)
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
>> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>>
>
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Nicu Buculei]

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:

As Nicu said, people are already working on this inside Fedora, instead of
creating a new distribution.

Here is a link: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EeePc


Here is a question for all you Eee (and compatibles) users: how about 
the wallpaper size?


In F9 we added 800x480 as a resolution for which we provide a desktop 
wallpaper (this is the screen size for Eee PC 701).


However, the new generation (from all vendors), launched/will launch 
this summer models with larger display, 8.9-10", with a resolution of 
1024x600px.
We try to keep the package size small, so I think it make sense to 
include only one wallpaper for ultraportables (we have only a few sized 
vor various aspect ratios, all the others are scaled down) and it should 
be 1024x600 (those with 7" displays will show a resized version, it is 
better in such cases to scale down than to scale up).


It is OK to "sacrifice" (a bit to strong said) the 701 series, which is 
not the "coolest thing" any more (and it has a slightly different aspect 
ratio)?


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)]

> Here is a question for all you Eee (and compatibles) users: how about
> the wallpaper size?
>
> In F9 we added 800x480 as a resolution for which we provide a desktop
> wallpaper (this is the screen size for Eee PC 701).
>
> However, the new generation (from all vendors), launched/will launch
> this summer models with larger display, 8.9-10", with a resolution of
> 1024x600px.
> We try to keep the package size small, so I think it make sense to
> include only one wallpaper for ultraportables (we have only a few sized
> vor various aspect ratios, all the others are scaled down) and it should
> be 1024x600 (those with 7" displays will show a resized version, it is
> better in such cases to scale down than to scale up).
>
> It is OK to "sacrifice" (a bit to strong said) the 701 series, which is
> not the "coolest thing" any more (and it has a slightly different aspect
> ratio)?
>
I've always wondered why we don't use SVG wallpapers... Is it too much
resources consuming to redraw the wallpaper ?

On the other hand, those tiny-ultra-mini-extra-small-portable are not
racing horses, and they are more (at least to me) some kind of super
electronic note-books (I'm speaking about a real paper note-book, not
about a laptop). So maybe they don't need the animated wallpaper and a
static version could be provided.

Maybe the best track would be to split the package. This would take the
same space on the media as all wallpapers should be included if we don't
want soemone to have a plain blue background, but at least, yum installs /
updates would not download the whole big almighty package...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Clint Savage]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Valent Turkovic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> are there anybody interested in working on Eeedora? As I can see by
> eeedora page (custom Fedora version for Asus eee) [1] it looks like it
> is dead in the water (please corect me if I'm wrong).
>
> I would put al of my talents to work on this project but I'm not a
> coder so please point me in the right direction. I see Ubuntu doing a
> much [2] more so I'm wandering it there is not engough Fedorans using
> Asus eeePC or are they just happy with Xandros or Ubuntu [2] on their
> Asus eees?
>
> [1] http://eeedora.complexvalues.com/
> [1b] http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora
> [2] http://www.ubuntu.com/products/mobile
>

I've been working on a kickstart for the EEEPC, I'm just about
finished.  Things are working almost perfectly.

I have it working as a LiveCD right now.

Check out the latest ks file --> http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/files/f9eeepc.ks

Cheers,

Clint

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Nicu Buculei]

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:

I've always wondered why we don't use SVG wallpapers... Is it too much
resources consuming to redraw the wallpaper ?


The first problem is that sometime we make use of advanced features in 
SVG which are not rendered properly by Nautilus. And yes, for complex 
images the resource consumption *is* a problem.



On the other hand, those tiny-ultra-mini-extra-small-portable are not
racing horses, and they are more (at least to me) some kind of super
electronic note-books (I'm speaking about a real paper note-book, not
about a laptop). So maybe they don't need the animated wallpaper and a
static version could be provided.


I am not the expert to talk about that (and probably this is not the 
right place, most likely the desktop or devel list) but I think the 
animation is not a problem.



Maybe the best track would be to split the package. This would take the
same space on the media as all wallpapers should be included if we don't
want soemone to have a plain blue background, but at least, yum installs /
updates would not download the whole big almighty package...


Sometime the space on media is a problem (think about the LiveCD) and 
even the space on your hdd may be a problem (think at first gen Eee PC 
701, with 2-4GB of storage).


And I think we want the default look and feel everywhere, this is our 
identity. But a spin (say a spin for ultraportables) can have (if I 
understood correctly) a different default (maybe a non-animated, small 
resolution version of the default wallpaper).


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:

> This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from 
> talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact 
> same paragraph.
> 
> Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!

Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)]

>> Maybe the best track would be to split the package. This would take the
>> same space on the media as all wallpapers should be included if we don't
>> want soemone to have a plain blue background, but at least, yum installs
>> /
>> updates would not download the whole big almighty package...
>
> Sometime the space on media is a problem (think about the LiveCD) and
> even the space on your hdd may be a problem (think at first gen Eee PC
> 701, with 2-4GB of storage).
>
> And I think we want the default look and feel everywhere, this is our
> identity. But a spin (say a spin for ultraportables) can have (if I
> understood correctly) a different default (maybe a non-animated, small
> resolution version of the default wallpaper).
>
That's exactly why I was suggesting to split the current package, so that
each spin could have its own wallpaper. And on the DVD, I don't think we
are currently running out of space...


--

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
French Fedora Ambassador

--
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,
 deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns

[Mike McGrath]

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:

>
> On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
> > This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
> > talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
> > same paragraph.
> >
> > Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!
>
> Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
> and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.
>

This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out?  I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.

  -Mike

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns

[Rahul Sundaram]

Mike McGrath wrote:

This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out?  I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.


I don't know if this would be considered a favor but someone from Fedora 
India team is working on packaging Zimbra for Fedora/helping Zimbra 
upstream with packaging.


https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-isv-sig-list/2008-July/msg0.html

If you have other ideas, let us know.

Rahul

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Cirgon Fedora HTPC

[Greg Dekoenigsberg]

See, this is the kind of thing I was talking about when I was talking 
about "success stories".


JonRob is a one man army, but it would be *awesome* to have more than just 
Jon as a storyteller/reporter.  Who could get in touch with these folks at 
Cirgon and ask some leading questions?


--g

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:


http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2008/07/14/cirgon-will-ship-a-fedora-linux-htpc-encore-media-server/

--
Paul W. Frields
 gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
 irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug



--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: eeedora 2.0 ?

[Nicu Buculei]

Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:

And I think we want the default look and feel everywhere, this is our
identity. But a spin (say a spin for ultraportables) can have (if I
understood correctly) a different default (maybe a non-animated, small
resolution version of the default wallpaper).


That's exactly why I was suggesting to split the current package, so that
each spin could have its own wallpaper. And on the DVD, I don't think we
are currently running out of space...


Then maybe someone should fill a bug against that package, I doubt the 
desktop guys read this list. Or talk on the spins SIG about which 
defaults are acceptable to be changed in a spin.


As for CD versus DVD, I have the feeling that lately we promote more and 
more the "Desktop" Live CD (where we have a number of package which 
deserve to be included but not enough space for them).


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Re: Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Mike McGrath wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:


On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:


This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
same paragraph.

Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!

Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.



This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out?  I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.



The ISV SIG has started the initiative to package Zimbra for Fedora, and 
I'm making it my personal vendetta to get it into EPEL as well.


Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list