Fedora Magazine: notes

2009-09-02 Thread Mel Chua
David Nalley brought out a convo to public IRC today (it's bounced 
around a bit in private email, I found out about it last night, and we 
agreed there wasn't any reason not to have this convo on a public 
list/channel, so here we go).


We logged our IRC conversation (w00t transparency - I'm trying to make 
logging important IRC convos and summarizing them to the list a cultural 
norm here).


Basically:

* Linux Pro Magazine (via the awesome Rikki Kite) can print a special 
Fedora issue.
* This would cost us money (on the order of magnitude of $10k, though we 
can recoup that if people pay for issues)
* This would ideally look like "Fedora Insight: The Print Version" (we'd 
want the content to be community-contributed rather than hiring outside 
writers, because Fedora already has awesome writers)
* If we want it for F12, we have to decide by the end of this week and 
somebody has to step up to lead/drive/edit/etc. this project (a somewhat 
monumental task)
* We can do this for a later release too, there's nothing particularly 
special about right now
* Right now, unless a miracle happens and somebody *really* wants to do 
this, we do not have the bandwidth to do it well for F12, but it would 
be awesome to do it for a later release, so we should talk with Rikki to 
see what the timing for an F13 or F14 print issue would look like.


And that's where things stand right now. Comments and thoughts welcome, 
as always.


The full log is at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_meetings#2009, or go directly 
to the log here: 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-mktg/2009-09-02/fedora-mktg.2009-09-02-13.55.log.html


--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora Magazine: notes

2009-09-02 Thread Mel Chua

This just in, from #fedora-marketing!

Short version:

Karsten: If Fedora Marketing doesn't have bandwidth to drive an F12 
print magazine, perhaps RHT Brand could chip in 
manpower/funding/resources-in-general to increase Fedora Marketing's 
bandwidth enough to get an F12 magazine to happen.
Mel: As long as it's owned by the Fedora community and supported by RHT 
instead of vice versa, that'd rock!
David: We probably have flexibility on the deadline, and should tell 
Rikki that this might become a possibility.

Max: I will ask Brand!

Long version:

 mchua: I'm wondering ... I know this is crazy ... and we sadly 
can't get commitment this week ..

 mchua: if the Brand team at RHT would like to help
 we could really use one of their project managers, for example
 and some of the writers; I'd love to see Bascha write something, 
for example.

 IMO, it could fit in with some of their existing campaigns.
 and it's a nice space filler while they let RHEL 6 bake.
 here, greg and max would have the best guess on if those folks 
might like/dislike.

 if the budget is US$10K, right, that is potentially doable.
 (yes, you learn to separate your sense of personal budget from 
business budget; I spend for other people what I would never spend for 
myself>)

* mchua needs to acquire this magical skill.
 quaid: argh, timing of Summit...
* neverho0d has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
 quaid, ke4qqq: do you have any idea how hard and fast the 
end-of-week deadline is?
 quaid: do you think RHT Brand would be willing to put somebody's 
time into driving this project (give them "Fedora contributor time" to 
do it)?
 quaid: 'cause even if Brand helps out, that still leaves an 
empty driver's seat, unless enough help materializes that the driver's 
seat duties are uberlight
 quaid: 'cause I'd also want to make sure it's a Fedora Thing 
supported by RHT, not a RHT thing that happens to mention Fedora in a 
lot of places
 (the ties and the collaboration should be close and strong, but 
ownership should ultimately come down on the Fedora community side, in 
my mind.)
* mchua thinking out loud, and welcomes counteropinions slammed against 
these thoughts.

 (They're not particularly well-formed.)
 mchua: so perhaps if brand provides the necessary resources 
(mainly pm stuff and budget) maybe we tell rikki that
 I get the feeling that it's not hard (given the fact of how 
they have let me slip with this.

 I am about to disappear into a meeting for a bit
 ke4qqq: well, we should run it by brand before we tell rikki 
"yay brand!" but I think it's definitely an idea worth exploring

* mchua waves to ke4qqq, have a good meeting!
 yeah - not committing on their part
 at the same time, I don't think there is harm in updating 
status with rikki
 +1 for this being a fedora thing supported by RHT and not vice 
versa
 right, let Rikki know that we have some ideas that we need 
another week to fix
 I think, of all people, Brand would understand the value of 
having it Fedora forward
 quaid: who in Brand to ping on this? or is this a "gregdek and 
spevack should ping brand, so let's ping Greg and Max" thing?
* mchua winces a little at the tight timeline; we're already racing the 
clock to get FI in, and I'll probably feel a lot better about this once 
the module packaging issues are all worked out for that
 (and able to take on more "will we make it? will we mke it?" 
risk)
 then again, 'risk aversion' is not an adjective that usually 
applies to me...

* spevack reads backward
* quaid busy, back in a moment
 mchua: what's the bottom line here?
 spevack: Linux Pro Magazine can do a Fedora Magazine print 
version for us (think FI content on paper) for the F12 release for 
~$10k, but we need to decide yes/no on F12 soon (this week, or next, no 
hard deadline per se)
 spevack: I originally said "our F12 plate is full, let's do this 
for F(later-version)" and then quaid brought up the idea of asking RHT 
Brand if they'd like to fund and drive it instead

* spevack will get in touch with cgrams ASAP and have a conversation
 and report back
 spevack: Ok. Do you need any more info? I'm going to paste this 
log to the mktg list as well, but 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2009-July/msg00140.html 
may be helpful

 when you're talking with cgrams.

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora Magazine: notes

2009-09-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 09/02/2009 10:36 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
> David Nalley brought out a convo to public IRC today (it's bounced
> around a bit in private email, I found out about it last night, and we
> agreed there wasn't any reason not to have this convo on a public
> list/channel, so here we go).
> 
> We logged our IRC conversation (w00t transparency - I'm trying to make
> logging important IRC convos and summarizing them to the list a cultural
> norm here).

Thanks for that. Just a quick note that I will be willing to write a
Fedora 12 Overview. I did one for Linux Identity magazine last cycle.
Let me know the precise deadlines, length etc if you need this.

Rahul

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list


Re: Fedora Magazine: notes

2009-09-03 Thread Mel Chua

Thanks for that. Just a quick note that I will be willing to write a
Fedora 12 Overview. I did one for Linux Identity magazine last cycle.
Let me know the precise deadlines, length etc if you need this.


Thanks, Rahul - we don't know the deadlines and length restrictions yet, 
but I added that question to the list to ask about tomorrow, 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_print_magazine#Questions


I also added a section at the bottom for volunteer offers like yours: 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_print_magazine#Volunteer


--Mel

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list