[Bug 187241] Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187241 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 00:03 EST --- Not much to say, really. "BuildPrereq" needs to be changed to "BuildRequires"; this will quiet rpmlint. Since it's just a simple change, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 4b256de164b8f094db9ccf0e6386d246 mboxgrep-0.7.9.tar.gz 4b256de164b8f094db9ccf0e6386d246 mboxgrep-0.7.9.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. X BuildPrereq is used instead BuildRequires, but the requirement are sane. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint complains of BuildPrereq use. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * info files are present and installed correctly. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * scriptlets are sane. APPROVED; fix the BuildPrereq: thing when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 20:17 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128528) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128528&action=view) spec patch Fairly trivial, bumps version to 0.2.7. Doesn't split of a devel subpackage, which may be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190502] New: Review Request: sportstracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 Summary: Review Request: sportstracker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: SportsTracker is an application for people which want to record their sporting activities. It is not bound to a specific kind of sport, the user can create categories for all sport types which are endurance related, such as cycling, running or swimming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 20:14 EST --- 0.2.7 builds but crashes when music is imported. Traced the problem to cowbell looking for libglib-2.0.so but on my system it is libglib-2.0.so.0 Symlinking it works, perhaps cowbell can be made to look there or glib2 made to provide a link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190493] New: Review Request: python-yaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 Summary: Review Request: python-yaml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/python-yaml/python-yaml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/python-yaml/python-yaml-0.3000.20060502-1.src.rpm Description: python-yaml is a packaging of Python YAML 3000, a YAML library for Python. I'm adding this because syck-python in Extras (or upstream syck, for that matter) doesn't have a dump() function (no serialization, so it's only half of a library) and this parser is more fully featured. It is also YAML 1.1 compliant as opposed to syck which only partially complies with YAML 1.0, and has some robustness issues in the C codebase. It's also a pure python module, which is also a plus for something as simple as YAML. dump() and load() have been manually tested and work, plus there is a suite of unit tests that have also been tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 17:07 EST --- I think you should bail on using clamd-wrapper. Use it as a base for a new clamav-exim (or clamav-server-exim) script, but change it so you can use the expected naming conventions for the init and logrotate scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 16:25 EST --- An i386 build segfaults as well, in the same place. This is all running on an x86_64 system; I'll try to get mock running on an i386 system just to make sure. Note that I can't try FC5 builds due to lack of mftrace in that repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190108] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 16:18 EST --- Well, I thought this was a dependency of plplot's docbook build, but apparently not really. I'm closing as NOTABUG and withdraw the submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 16:07 EST ---
> Anyway, one quick comment on the spec: rather than using a specific mirror in
> the Source URLs, try using URLs like this:
>
> Source0: http://dl.sf.net/gqclient/gq-%{version}.tar.gz
Sure, fixed. We are at -4:
Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec
SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-4.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||190483 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 16:02 EST --- This is tough; now I'm getting a segfault: Initializing FontConfig... Rebuilding FontConfig cache /builddir/.rh-fontconfig/.fonts.cache-2. this may take a while... adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/ adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/type1/Building font database. /bin/sh: line 1: 23617 Segmentation fault /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/lily/out/lilypond --verbose /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/ly/generate-documentation make[2]: *** [out/lilypond-internals.texi] Error 139 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/Documentation/user' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/Documentation' make: *** [all] Error 2 I'll try an i386 build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 15:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #37) > I think before I can work forwart we must found an global solution for CT-API > in > Fedora. I agree, unfortunatly I don't have much (any?) time for that this week I'll try to take a look this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 15:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #42) > Should the zaptel subpackage really obsolete the sqlite subpackage? Oops, no that's a cut-n-pasto on my part. Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 2 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.2.7.1-6 - Zaptel subpackage shouldn't obsolete the sqlite subpackage. - Remove mISDN until build issues can be figured out. * Mon Apr 24 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.2.7.1-5 - Build mISDN channel drivers, modelled after spec file from David Woodhouse * Thu Apr 20 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 1.2.7.1-4 - Update chan_bluetooth patch with some additional information as to it's source and comment out more in the configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 15:19 EST --- Updated Package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/yakuake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm Added gettext to BuildRequires as pointed from Comment #1. Dawid Gajownik: Sorry, I didn't know about your package, as I searched in Bugzilla and Wiki and did not found anything. I'm new to Extras so I was looking for some packages to create/update/maintain. But since you "arrived" first, it's fair that you get this package (if you want :D). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 15:05 EST --- Thanks for the logs. It appears that the configure script looks for the location of some fonts using locate, and the default location is "unknown" if locate is not present. Fortunately, you can work around this with a configure option that specifies the directory. I have also disabled parallel builds in response to your report, although it may be worth testing them one more time. I've uploaded new files: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 15:02 EST --- Should the zaptel subpackage really obsolete the sqlite subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 14:58 EST --- Hehe, I also wanted to take this package over ;) http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg00924.html I looked at your spec file - you missed BR gettext. Without it translations will not be built. Here's my spec file → http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/yakuake.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190471] New: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/yakuake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm Description: Yakuake is a Quake-style terminal emulator based on KDE Konsole technology. Its features includes a smoothly rolls down from the top of your screen, a tabbed interface, configurable dimensions and animation speeds, and more. This is related to bug #186283. The maintainer didn't respond for too long, so I made an update in the package for inclusion in FC5 extras, with a new version of the program. This is my third package here in Extras, so I think I'll need a sponsor for this one too :-) I dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 14:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128504) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128504&action=view) Log from last failed build attempt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174898] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 13:46 EST --- It's been almost 4 months now with no import. I don't see you in the owners.list (with this e-mail anyway) so I'm going to assume I took this bug by mistake (as in you need a sponsor, which I can't do). Kicking back to FE-NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 12:56 EST --- More oddness. On a hunch I disabled parallel make (which turns up lots of errors on an 8-CPU machine) and to: cat out/feta-braces-h.lisp \ \ > out/feta-braces-h.otf-table cat out/feta-braces-i.lisp \ \ > out/feta-braces-i.otf-table make[1]: *** No rule to make target `unknown/c059013l.pfb', needed by `out/CenturySchL-Ital.ttf'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/mf' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5626 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 12:49 EST --- I just tried to build in mock and received this: ERROR: Please install required programs: Python.h (python-devel, python-dev or libpython-dev package) See INSTALL.txt for more information on how to build LilyPond I added BuildRequires: python-devel and got a bunch of errors, which I'll try to condense: kpathsea: Running mktexfmt mf.base /usr/bin/mktexfmt: line 331: /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/tcfmgr: No such file or directory fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. I can't find the base file `mf.base'! make[1]: *** [out/feta11.tfm] Error 1 tcfgmgr is in tetex, so I added BR: tetex, but then I get to one I can't figure out: cat out/feta23.lisp \ out/parmesan23.lisp \ out/feta-alphabet23.lisp > out/feta23.otf-table cat out/feta26.lisp \ out/parmesan26.lisp \ out/feta-alphabet26.lisp > out/feta26.otf-table cat: out/parmesan23.lisp: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [out/feta23.otf-table] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make: *** [all] Error 2 Full build log available on request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 11:46 EST --- You were right. With the correct permissions, the file is now automatically stripped. I've uploaded updated files: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-3.src.rpm http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec As I noted earlier, I'm ignoring the "file-not-utf8" warning from rpmlint, and I'm also not going to deal with adding a desktop file for the time being. If you consider either of these important for approval, I'm willing to reconsider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 11:39 EST --- Can anyone else re-create this error? If not I'm going to wipe my 64 machine with a clean install and try it again. If it works I'm going to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Core Component|themes-backgrounds-gnome|evolution --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 11:16 EST --- This bug report is dirty like zebra. Putting it on the proper product. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |fc5 Severity|normal |low Component|Package Review |themes-backgrounds-gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190450] New: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: I noticed this problem after Evolution was not showing any icons. I have FC5 installed with KDE (no gnome). I then filed a bug with evolution (bugzilla.gnome.org), and was responded to verify the gtkrc. I then changed the default icon theme and (re)checked the file and found that the new theme was not updated in the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190304] Review Request: mtd-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mtd-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190304 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 08:30 EST --- Added BuildRequires: zlib-devel Added COPYING (and also upstream from your git tree) Not added Requires: zlib since that's automatic. Imported and built. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 08:24 EST --- APPROVED go ahead and import it into CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 07:43 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > It would be a little easier to patch the current desktop file
>
> Done. -3 ready:
>
> Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec
> SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-3.src.rpm
Hmm, it seems that gq is back from the dead. I actually came to look at this
review request with a view to seeing if you'd looked at lat (Bug #177580) as an
alternative to gq, since gq was dead when I was looking for a GUI LDAP tool
myself last year. I'll have to go and look at gq myself now ;-)
Anyway, one quick comment on the spec: rather than using a specific mirror in
the Source URLs, try using URLs like this:
Source0: http://dl.sf.net/gqclient/gq-%{version}.tar.gz
Not only will that potentially use any mirror, it's a bit shorter too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 05:08 EST --- Updated sec.init default runlevel http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec-2.3.3-2.src.rpm http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec.spec Comment #8 : - John, could you please pm me your .rpmlintrc ? With rpmlint-0.76, I do not get any of the above warnings/errors. - Source0 : I get a '404 Not found' on the suggested http://download.sourceforge.net/simple-evcorr/sec-2.3.3.tar.gz ; my proposed http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/simple-evcorr/sec-2.3.3.tar.gz does not yield any errors ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-02 03:07 EST --- > It would be a little easier to patch the current desktop file Done. -3 ready: Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
