[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 04:53 EST --- Hmmm ... the URLs in comment #48 still don't work for me, pulseaudio.spec seems to be the version from 2006-08-20 and pulseaudio-0.9.4-2.src.rpm doesn't exist Curiously http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/public.html seems to contain the latest pulseaudio.spec Am I the only one having these problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203694] New: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/rawstudio.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/rawstudio-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Rawstudio is an open source raw-image converter written in GTK+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 05:00 EST --- Please note this is my 3rd package open for review, but I am not yet an official contributor, so a sponsor is still needed for an official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 05:02 EST --- I guess it was a bit late when I uploaded those. They should work now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 05:37 EST --- Created an attachment (id=134695) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134695action=view) Patch to spec to build separate jack package When I build pulseaudio, because of having jack-audio-connection-kit installed, the build complains about unpackaged modules: /usr/lib/pulse-0.9/modules/module-jack-sink.so /usr/lib/pulse-0.9/modules/module-jack-source.so Attached a patch to include these in a separate pulseaudio-module-jack package, if an optional --with jack build switch is used. I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it or if there is a way to detect an optional dependency and use it automatically. If you have jack-audio-connection kit installed and build without --with jack the build will fail, so I'm sure there's a better way - any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 06:09 EST --- Anything happening with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 06:10 EST --- Anything happening with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 06:39 EST --- New SRPM with fixes to all rpmlint warnings: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-2.src.rpm -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 07:01 EST --- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 07:03 EST --- Ping! It looks like mono-debugger is going to be required for the next release of MonoDevelop (due shortly) so this package could probably do with being looked at -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 07:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pulseaudio-0.9.4-3.src.rpm JACK should always be built, so this version has more or less your patch (just no if:s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 08:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mono-debugger-0.30-2.src.rpm Removes the old mono hack Rebuilt for new mono packages Added BR mono-nunit Added R pkgconfig for -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 08:55 EST ---
Here are some comments from me:
rpmlint shows some errors:
W: whysynth-dssi incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.3-3 20060122-3.fc5
last changelog entry mentions version 0.1.3-3 but the package is 20060122-3,
the other entries may have the wrong version, too.
W: whysynth-dssi dangling-symlink /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host
Don't know, what this means.
W: whysynth-dssi
symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host
Make sure, the symlink is relative.
W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog __rm
W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog makeinstall
Macros mentioned in %changelog must be escaped with an %, e.g. %%{__rm}
instead of %{__rm}
Package builds in mock, but there are some warnigs in the build log:
whysynth_voice.c: In function 'y_voice_note_on':
whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param
large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param
large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param
large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice.c:79: warning: inlining failed in call to 'y_eg_setup': --param
large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice.c:214: warning: called from here
[...]
whysynth_voice_render.c: In function 'y_voice_render':
whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2171: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2172: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2173: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:1298: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'oscillator': --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2174: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2352: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2353: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2354: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2355: warning: called from here
whysynth_voice_render.c:283: warning: inlining failed in call
to 'y_voice_update_lfo': --param large-function-growth limit reached
whysynth_voice_render.c:2356: warning: called from here
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 09:40 EST --- You use %defattr(-,root,root) instead of %defattr(-,root,root,-) - is this intentionally? Why is there no desktop file as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ? If you add it, please not inline but in an extra file. Why do you use '%makeinstall' instead of the favoured 'make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202439] Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 09:40 EST --- * Wed Aug 23 2006 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.0-9 - Filter out the autogenerated Provides for our private perl modules and also filter out the matching AutoRequires to still get an installable package Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/frozen-bubble-1.0.0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 10:00 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=134711)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711action=view)
Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined
Hello.
So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because
I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package?
I think that this package leaves little problem, so
it would be better that this package can be released ASAP.
The reason I mentioned little is because
* I can rebuild this package with mock.
* however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even
with proper BR rpms installed
because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied
when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above.
Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package
can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is
not needed, perhaps?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 10:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #41)
Created an attachment (id=134711)
--
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134711action=view)
[edit]
Build log of gcin-1.2.2-8 on fc6-devel with fedora undefined
Hello.
So I cannot sponsor formally for this package (because
I am not a member), who will be the sponsor for this package?
It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package.
I think that this package leaves little problem, so
it would be better that this package can be released ASAP.
The reason I mentioned little is because
* I can rebuild this package with mock.
* however, I canNOT rebuild this package without mock even
with proper BR rpms installed
because usually %{fedora} is undefined and so Patch5 is applied
when rebuilt withOUT mock, this is not right for FC5 and above.
Now, FC4 and below FC4 are marked as regacy, so this package
can be released only for FE5 and FE6-devel. So, Patch5 is
not needed, perhaps?
You can define the macro manyually if you wish:
$ rpmbuild -ba --define 'fedora 5' --define 'dist .fc5' packagename.spec
I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro
undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra
defines were only needed for the legacy distros,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 10:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #42) It is the submitter that is sponsored, not the package. Oh, yes. What I meant was who will sponsor Chung-Yen Chang? I think it would be better though if the default (i.e. with the fedora macro undefined) was appropriate for the current release (FC5/FC6) and the extra defines were only needed for the legacy distros, I have the same opinion. It would be better that the spec file assumes that the distro is FC-5 or above if %fedora is not defined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||187351 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:10 EST ---
Re: comment #48:
The %{?fedora} macro isn't defined in my rpm though, so I couldn't
include that part. Is it perhaps only present on the build system?
Yes, the buildsystem defines it, as well as a few others, like %{dist}. You
can similate that via:
rpmbuild --define fedora 5 -bb pulseaudio.spec
That said, package looks good, APPROVED. Now I have to figure out this
sponsorship thing. (:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:12 EST --- Spec file for 1.2-3 : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/xmms-musepack.spec Please feel free to review, it's been a while, and I'd really like this package to get out of the queue... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:17 EST --- I am ready to approve, but with the -q to setup. It is not required by the guidelines, but it generates a rpmlint warning, isn't usefull and goes against what is done in most packages. I may approve it without the -q if you convince me that %setup without -q adds anything else than output lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:28 EST --- I'm CC'ing Matthias (no, not myself) since he seems to be the one taking care of this package recently. I'll attach a new patch. The _important_ fix is to not own the base directories : /usr/share/applications/ /usr/share/gnome/ /usr/share/omf/ The rest is only cosmetic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #120956|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:29 EST --- Created an attachment (id=134727) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134727action=view) Spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:36 EST --- Here we go again :-) I won't try to convince you about anything, just point out two things : - Guideline discussions don't belong in package submission entries, please put the review on hold and start discussing on the maintainers, packaging or extras list if you feel something should be addressed. - From my POV, the -q to setup is silly, and should be configurable in the build system directly, pretty much like defattr, buildroot, clean... but again, this is something to bring up on a public list, not here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 11:55 EST --- Fer cryin out loud, let's just bang this out and be done with it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:08 EST --- * %excluding the .la file is probably not necessary, but not bad to do so either. * Provided SOURCE: url didn't work for me, but this did: http://files2.musepack.net/linux/plugins/xmms-musepack-1.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:10 EST --- Some source files do not have an Copyright / GPL header: fskip.c malloc.c itypes.h util.h About the license file: MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Please ask upstream to add the license and add copyright headers to the mentioned files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #127652|0 |1 is obsolete|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:11 EST --- upstream source checks out: ff7f5f9122d09ad63af9c564046086cf xmms-musepack-1.2.tar.bz2 Everything else is simple, clean... APPROVED. (and please fix the Source: URL, before requesting any builds) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:15 EST --- I noticed something else: A BR is: tcl-devel = 8.4 and in %build you use TCL_VERSION=8.4 It seems to me that because of this the spec file will not work for tcl-devel version 8.6 so you may better use tcl-devel = 8.4 imho. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:17 EST --- Sorry for writing so many comments, I forgot to mention that rpmlint shows an error: E: vkeybd non-executable-script /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybd.tcl 0444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:17 EST --- What spec file did you look at? The last link I posted already had the source you mention in comment #26 and it seems to work. All good to go I guess, thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:20 EST --- Such a felony against the holy -q, assigned traitor! This sad day, a battle I lost ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:23 EST --- I must have looked at the spec from the last src.rpm (1.2-2?). oops. Patrice, sure, mark me a traiter, I just don't see why reviews should be held up on semantics and/or maintainer preferences (ie, non MUST items) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) I must have looked at the spec from the last src.rpm (1.2-2?). oops. Patrice, sure, mark me a traiter, I just don't see why reviews should be held up on semantics and/or maintainer preferences (ie, non MUST items) No problem, I truely approve your felony, since it is a non MUST item :-) But with my high principles on setup -q I couldn't approve that evil specfile ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 12:41 EST --- Thanks, fixed in 2.15.92-2.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kpolynome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 13:22 EST --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kpolynome-0.1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 13:32 EST --- I patched the specfile and fixed the minor issues and suggestions. New Version: Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie-0.17.1-2.fc5.src.rpm I will try to review some packages the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203774] New: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/xcircuit-3.4.26-1.src.rpm Description: Xcircuit is a general-purpose drawing program and also a specific-purpose CAD program for circuit schematic drawing and schematic capture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:16 EST --- Request for take over ? Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown-0.8.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:24 EST --- I guess the new SRPM URL is http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdeedu-3.5.4-1.src.rpm :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:32 EST --- Sorry, I was on vacation. With your latest release, on launching klamav, I'm falling on the error I mentioned before. http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223058851size=o Same for updating the database :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203249] Review Request: kpolynome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kpolynome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203249
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:37 EST ---
Well, only for packaging issue.
mock build is okay.
* %post and %postun calls %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache.
Require it as Requires(post) and Requires(postun).
* %patch0 -p0 -b .
Very cosmetic, however, adding some suffix is perhaps
preferable.
* chmod 644 %{_builddir}/%{name}-0.1/AUTHORS
Why the explicit directory %{_builddir}/%{name}-0.1 necessary?
Usually, in %build or %install stage, the working directory is
what is written in %setup stage.
* Any reasons that document HTML files should be in
%{_docdir}/HTML/??/%{name} ? On my system, the only rpm which
uses %{_docdir}/HTML/ is fedora-release-notes.
Documents in other rpms should be in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}.
I suggest moving HTML document files.
* rpmlint is not silent.
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/drawwidget.h
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindialog.h
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/drawwidget.cpp
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindlg.ui.h
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/matdata.cpp
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedialog.h
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/main.cpp
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedialog.cpp
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/matdata.h
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/maindialog.cpp
E: kpolynome-debuginfo script-without-shellbang
/usr/src/debug/kpolynome-0.1/src/curvedlg.ui.h
--- permission issue. Fix this by changing the permissions of these files to
644.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:43 EST --- Chitlesh, I'd suggest opening a new report (so that you are properly marked as Reporter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:43 EST --- Good guess! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:45 EST --- Ok :) I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203789] New: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/kshutdown-0.8.2-4.src.rpm Description: KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Ideally yes, but rpm doesn't do this by default so it has to be done in each package. One, RPM *does* do this by default now. Two, RPM is a package manager, not a build system. You'll note I said build system. Even if rpm was changed to do this automatically, packages desiring compatibility with older distributions would still need to clean the buildroot themselves. Not if you're using a sane build system, like Mezzanine, which handles all that for you like a good build system should. For what it's worth, there's now a LICENSE file in LibAST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||du) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:52 EST --- What's the status of this submission? It'd be great to have kdebluetooth included soon. Comment 13 does not seem to be addressed yet. I'm unable to use SELinux in enforcing mode for various reasons at the moment and I don't have a Rawhide setup available to test with its policy, so in case nobody takes over review responsibility of this package from me (everyone's welcome!), I'm afraid it'll take until some time after FC6 release until I can promise to continue the review. It's not entirely impossible earlier though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186817] Review Request: kshutdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|Reopened| Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:55 EST --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 203789 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 14:56 EST --- *** Bug 186817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 15:33 EST --- Duplicate, to mark myself as the reporter :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 16:08 EST --- Rpmlint complains, chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/kdeedu-3.5.4-1.i386.rpm E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/blinken.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/blinken.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kalzium.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kalzium.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kanagram.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kanagram.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kbruch.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kbruch.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/keduca.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/keduca.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgeography.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kgeography.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/khangman.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/khangman.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kiten.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kiten.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/klatin.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/klatin.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/klettres.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/klettres.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kmplot.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kmplot.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kstars.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kstars.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktouch.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/ktouch.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kturtle.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kturtle.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kverbos.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kverbos.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kvoctrain.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kvoctrain.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kwordquiz.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/kwordquiz.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/languagesettings.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/languagesettings.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/presettings.kcfg W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config.kcfg/presettings.kcfg E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/khangmanrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/khangmanrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/klettresrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/klettresrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kstarsrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kstarsrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kvoctrainrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kvoctrainrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/kwordquizrc W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/kwordquizrc E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/magic/cabri.magic W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/magic/cabri.magic E: kdeedu file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/magic/drgeo.magic W: kdeedu conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/magic/drgeo.magic W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kvoctrain/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klettres/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmplot/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kstars/common ../common W: kdeedu hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/applnk/Edutainment/Mathematics/.directory W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kbruch/common ../common W: kdeedu dangling-relative-symlink
[Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data
Explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 17:01 EST ---
Quick notes...
Release: 1 - needs the dist
License: IBM Public License - is this a valid licence Fedora is happy with?
%prep
%{__libtoolize} --force
%{__aclocal}
%{__autoconf}
%{__autoheader}
%{__automake} -a
Is this lot really needed or can the relibtoolize thing work?
--with-jni-path=%{java_home}/include \
You need something in the BR if java is going to be used
You have
%{_libdir}/%{name}/ in files and %{_libdir}/%{name}/samples in samples. As the
files has already taken ownership of %{_libdir}/%{name}, does the second one
need to be in there?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data
Explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 17:07 EST ---
dist - ACK, will fix
License is OSI-approved: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ibmpl.php
%prep - I prefer to spell them out, autoreconf never worked for me
java support is in todo it doesn't build currently, hence commented out
BuildRequires: java-devel
I have %exclude %{_libdir}/dx/samples in main
and %{_libdir}/dx/samples in -samples
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203825] New: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203825 Summary: yum install gdl failes due to dependency on ImageMagic Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: When attempting to install gdl as a part of the listed packages for pirut, it depends on ImageMagic - a package that doesn't exist. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: See description Steps to Reproduce: 1. See description 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 18:00 EST --- Hi, What is the status of this package? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 18:08 EST --- Any news from Digium yet? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 18:09 EST --- Hi, What is the status of this package? Thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 19:03 EST --- In response to comment #22: I think it's waiting to hear the fate of the zaptel-kmod submission. Once thats decided we can close or move this one forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) Alias: papyrus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 19:08 EST --- Yup. There was a new release of cairomm that was just pushed into FC6 with a stable API and a few minor changes. In particular Cairo::clear_path() became Cairo::begin_new_path() so I was waiting to do the builds until I could have FC6 and FC5 at the same time. I just got FC6 on my laptop last night, so I'm hoping to do some final tests tonight or tomorrow night. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 19:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) What is the status of this package? It's in a bit of limbo... There's not much point to getting spandsp in Extras unless Asterisk makes it in, and there's not much point for Asterisk in Fedora Extras without the Zaptel kernel modules (you lose a lot of important/interesting functionality in Asterisk without Zaptel). The Zaptel modules are being held up due to disagreements about how to package them properly (or even if they should be packaged at all). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 19:53 EST --- I agree about the debuginfo package, and it's OK if it's not really possible to make it complete, but I don't know what to do about the dangling symlinks. You can't just delete them from the source directory as that would break short-circuit builds. I wanted to build the package with your changes but the src.rpm link is no longer valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 20:49 EST --- It seems to me that you still / again need a sponsor since your other package is (going to be) in Fedora Core instead of Extras and I do not find your e-mail address in the list of cvsextras members. This means you need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the blocks input field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 20:57 EST --- Tasaka thanks for you review and test. This is mistake for patch5, but now I think patch5 is not necessary, so I remove it. Both Howarth's and Tasaka's suggestion are very good. So I think set fc5/fc6 to default in spec is more appropriate, I will keep in mind. The new files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-10.src.rpm I use mock build for fc6/fc5 are cleanly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 22:07 EST --- Created an attachment (id=134765) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134765action=view) gcin.spec-10.patch If the package is only for fc5 and later, then I think it is better to just simplify it like this. (There is no problem to use gcin.conf on fc4 and earlier afaics.) As I tried to say in comment 40, I will sponsor Chung-Yen Chang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 22:23 EST --- Hi, Petersen, I try to merge it to spec file (for fc3 fc4 fc5 fc6 and rhel4). But, after all, I think it is better to simplify it like your patch. So maybe it is better form me to seperate the spec file for fc5 and later and fc4 and earlier and rhel4. And another question, I know use gcon.conf on fc4 and earlier is no problem, but I think it is better for use gcin then gcin.conf on fc4 and earlier. (It look a little stranger if use gcin.conf) [candyz:~] im-switch -z zh_TW -l xinput-zh_TW - status is manual. link currently points to gcin scim - priority 81 oxim - priority 30 gcin.conf - priority 40 Current `best' version is scim. === The following languages currently have input methods configured: as_IN bn_IN en_US gu_IN hi_IN ja_JP kn_IN ko_KR ml_IN ne_NE or_IN pa_IN si_LK ta_IN te_IN th_TH vi_VN zh_CN zh_HK zh_SG zh_TW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #134765|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 23:05 EST --- Created an attachment (id=134766) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=134766action=view) gcin.spec-10.1.patch Okay, you're right - I was being too hasty. Here is a better patch, which should handle %fedora correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #134765|1 |0 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 23:16 EST --- I merge the gcin.spec-10.1.patch New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-11.src.rpm Petersen, thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 202820] Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfuse - A configuration file parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 23:17 EST --- Whoops, forgot to close this out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 23:19 EST --- But sorry, the last patch still doesn't help when %fedora is not defined. So yes, it is probably easiest just to branch the spec file for fc5 as I originally thought too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-23 23:48 EST --- Now I branch the spec file. New files: Spec URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec SRPM URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin-1.2.2-12.src.rpm Spec for fc4 and earlier URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec-branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203864] New: Review Request: tripwire - IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire-2.4.0.1-1.fc6.2.src.rpm Description: tripwire has been orphaned for some time now, and neglected upstream for almost as long. I talked with Warren a while back about taking over and have finally decided to do so. However, upstream is still active on their forums and has been promising the next release since March. Nonetheless, I have contacted upstream in hopes of spurring some activity, and hopefully a new release that is gcc4-compatible out of the box, but no replies as of yet. This SRPM builds and runs on my FC5 i386 (has been running for the last 3 days without incident) as well as builds in mock FC6 i386, but I don't have access to x86_64 hardware to test builds. The spec file _does_ specify ExclusiveArch ix86, but that is leftover from 2.3.0 and some posts in the forums vaguely indicate that 2.4.0 builds and runs fine on 64bit hardware. I'd appreciate anybody willing to remove the ExclusiveArch and test building/executing on an x86_64 machine. It looks ugly while it's building, throws LOTS of warnings, 95% of which are complaining about non-virtual dtor's. I brought this up in my letter to upstream, but the binaries seem to run fine despite being narrowly compilable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 00:08 EST --- srpm looks good to me and gcin.spec-branch. (I think you forgot to update gcin.spec.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 00:11 EST --- I also requested access to his SVN repository (he houses the code outside of sourceforge), or if there's even anything in there worth having, so we could possibly pacakge newer SVN code without an official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 00:13 EST --- Sorry, I forgot to update gcin.spec. Now the gcin.spec updated. :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191017] Review Request: eclipse-subclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |ne.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 00:46 EST --- Things look very good and I will work up a full review tomorrow, but I wanted to comment on one thing: All eclipse related RPMs package dependencies as absolute links, i just did the same. Given the state of many core packages, unless you can point to an Extras-style review then pointing to what an existing package does is not generally a valid argument. Still, in this case I asked around and the issue of the symlink-should-be-relative warning is not clear cut. The main reason for the warning is the fact that absolute symlinks get in the way of proper operation with chroots (since the links will point to different files depending on whether you've chrooted or not). Symlinks can have this problem too if they contain excessive .. components, but hopefully that would be caught in a review. So I tend to believe that it would be better to use relative symlinks, but it's not really essential for a desktop application and in this case the rest of eclipse is bound to have the same issue. I won't block on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 01:06 EST --- Well, srpm and spec seems well for me. too. (I only tested for http://cle.linux.org.tw/candyz/gcin.spec ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-24 01:43 EST ---
Well, as far as I check this rpm very quickly,
the packaging issue is almost okay.
# rpmlint is clean.
# mock build okay.
* Source:http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/...
They say that http://xcircuit.ece.jhu.edu/ is obsolete, and I can
find this source on:
http://opencircuitdesign.com/xcircuit/archive/xcircuit-3.4.26.tgz .
* %patch0 -p0 -b .
For kindness, please add some suffix.
* %post
if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
Require %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache on post and postun.
* The included file /usr/lib/xcircuit-3.4/man/xcircuit.1 is
necessary?
* I don't know well how to use this, however, when I launch this
by just typing xcircuit , then I see the following error
message:
loading history file ... 1 events added
error in slave eval:
image type xpm doesn't exist
Main console display active (Tcl8.4.13 / Tk8.4.13)
Is this okay?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
