[Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 03:02 EST --- ocrad is used more than gocr in the new version, and the scansets are configurable: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/browser/trunk/devel/FuzzyOcr.scansets I don't blame you for becoming disinterested seeing as no one who could do a review has made a comment in 3 weeks. As a start, could someone please comment on the naming of this rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 03:09 EST --- spamassassin-FuzzyOcr is what I would name it if it were my package, but I'll leave this to the packager's discretion, as it is an obvious grey area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 03:53 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 04:01 EST --- Okay I think the new srpm and spec cover everything in the TODO. rpmlint retunrs clean for me now. I read over the py files and it is calling latex and dvips which are both in the tetex-latex package, not tetex. http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript.spec http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-6.fc7.src.rpm http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-6.fc7.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 04:02 EST --- There is a new version available, maybe it fixes some of the issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Alias: MyBashBurn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 04:43 EST ---
E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666
--- Note that this is good and is necessary for the package,
see comment #3
Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary
users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of
user-local configuration files in $HOME.
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug
Then your RPM config or installation is broken. You don't need to
create that directory.
mybashburn conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mybashburnrc
This refers to
%config(noreplace) /etc/mybashburnrc
which influences RPM's strategy for *.rpmsave/*.rpmnew config files.
E: mybashburn script-without-shebang
This is a hint about all the executable files which should not be
executable. Take a close look at rpm --query --list mybashburn and
notice the questionable file permissions.
The manual page is executable, too. And so are many other files which
need not be executable.
E: mybashburn standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin
List the files included in your package:
rpm --query --list --verbose mybashburn
You include the directory /usr/bin which is wrong, since it belongs into
the core filesystem package already.
E: mybashburn wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/mybashburn/lang/Polish/multi.lang
-- WTF?.
There are DOS/Windows-style 0x0d 0x0a (carriage return, linefeed) line
delimiters used in that file instead of just 0x0a (linefeed). Should be
fixed upstream. Can be fixed with dos2unix or sed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 05:14 EST --- Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 05:41 EST --- * the autotools related patches should be made upstream (after removal of fedora specific stuff). Did you contact them? * tcp_wrappers-devel is out in devel * rpmlint warnings seems to be ignorable. * I reiterate that dlopened objects are better without version, I think the current spec is right. * ntop is still uninterruptible by Ctrl-C when the password is entered, but I guess it is because Ctrl-C is interpreted as a character of the password. * I still get, after ctrl-C for the first run: mar 12 déc 2006 12:07:28 CET THREADMGMT[t3029126032]: RRD: Data collection thread terminated [p11257] *** glibc detected *** ntop: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x096121f0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ff54b] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x7e)[0x300c6e] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safestrdup+0x39)[0xb585c9] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(traceEvent+0x312)[0xb7c472] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(pcapDispatch+0x1d2)[0xb5ba02] /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x1532db] /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0x365eee] === Memory map: Abandon * Kevin made this relevant comment: 8. Instead of removing the .a files you could just pass '--disable-static' to configure. Possibly also enable: --enable-snmp ? * I dislike the following in the init file: chown -f root.ntop /var/ntop/*db /dev/null 21 chmod -f 664 /var/ntop/*db /dev/null 21 Is it really needed? * when starting ntop with /etc/init.d/ntop start the [ OK ] doesn't appear. * the mechanism described in the PRIVACY NOTICE of the man page should be disabled, at least when started from init file. (the option may be in the ntp.conf file, for example). * ntop web server listens on all interfaces. In the default case it should only listen to localhost, with -w 127.0.0.1:3000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 06:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) * the autotools related patches should be made upstream (after removal of fedora specific stuff). Did you contact them? No, I want to make sure everything is working first. * tcp_wrappers-devel is out in devel I will fix that in the next update. * rpmlint warnings seems to be ignorable. I agree. * I reiterate that dlopened objects are better without version, I think the current spec is right. I agree. * ntop is still uninterruptible by Ctrl-C when the password is entered, but I guess it is because Ctrl-C is interpreted as a character of the password. I believe that is true, but I'll look into it. * I still get, after ctrl-C for the first run: mar 12 déc 2006 12:07:28 CET THREADMGMT[t3029126032]: RRD: Data collection thread terminated [p11257] *** glibc detected *** ntop: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x096121f0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ff54b] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x7e)[0x300c6e] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(ntop_safestrdup+0x39)[0xb585c9] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(traceEvent+0x312)[0xb7c472] /usr/lib/libntop-3.2.so(pcapDispatch+0x1d2)[0xb5ba02] /lib/libpthread.so.0[0x1532db] /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0x365eee] === Memory map: Abandon I'm unable to reproduce this. Try loading the debug symbols and getting a backtrace under gdb. * Kevin made this relevant comment: 8. Instead of removing the .a files you could just pass '--disable-static' to configure. Possibly also enable: --enable-snmp ? I'll include both of those in the next release. * I dislike the following in the init file: chown -f root.ntop /var/ntop/*db /dev/null 21 chmod -f 664 /var/ntop/*db /dev/null 21 Is it really needed? I dislike it too. There are some non-trivial permission problems that we must overcome. I think another patch is in order because I just found a security hole (the admin password file is created world readable). * when starting ntop with /etc/init.d/ntop start the [ OK ] doesn't appear. Fixed for the next release. * the mechanism described in the PRIVACY NOTICE of the man page should be disabled, at least when started from init file. (the option may be in the ntp.conf file, for example). I forgot about this, so I'll fix it in the next release. * ntop web server listens on all interfaces. In the default case it should only listen to localhost, with -w 127.0.0.1:3000 You're right, I'll change that in the init script and config file as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container
format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 07:08 EST ---
Great, if we can have this in Extras.
First review steps, the spec file :
- Please don't mix space and tab identing in spec files (there is one tab).
- I suggest you use %{version} in Source0 line to be sure not to miss an update.
- You should update to your 1.5.0.1 package, I guess...
- Do we want to be shipping the static library? Probably not.
- You should switch to make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT (it works).
About the build :
- It compiles fine (tested FC6 x86_64), but with quite a few warnings.
About the resulting packages :
I tried to recompile the latest easytag, enabling libmp4v2 support, but the
build failed with this error :
gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -o easytag about.o ape_tag.o
bar.o browser.o cddb.o charset.o crc32.o dlm.o easytag.o et_core.o flac_header.o
flac_tag.o id3_tag.o misc.o monkeyaudio_header.o mpeg_header.o mp4_header.o
mp4_tag.o musepack_header.o msgbox.o ogg_header.o ogg_tag.o picture.o prefs.o
scan.o setting.o vcedit.o -L/lib64 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 libapetag/libapetag.a id3lib/libid3bugfix.a
-lmp4v2 -lz -lstdc++ -lid3 -lFLAC -lvorbisfile -lvorbis -logg -lm
mp4_header.o: In function `getType':
/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/easytag-1.99.13/src/mp4_header.c:125: undefined reference to
`MP4GetTrackMediaDataName'
mp4_header.o: In function `Mp4_Header_Read_File_Info':
/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/easytag-1.99.13/src/mp4_header.c:240: undefined reference to
`MP4GetTrackAudioChannels'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
The linking stage seems to be including -lmp4v2 properly, but fails to find
those two functions (using 1.4.1). Do you have any idea why? Would it be a
problem with libmp4v2 or with how easytag tries to use it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 07:47 EST --- Well, again ping? I will close this bug as NOTABUG if I cannot receive any response within one week according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 07:48 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219103] Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvdauthor - Command line DVD authoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 07:56 EST --- I'll try to review this once legal doubts are cleared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 08:04 EST --- New ping. Rex, what is the status of this RR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 08:36 EST --- reply to comment#56: fcron couldn't replace vixie-cron, until fcron had selinux support, pam authentification, ... It has to work well under selinux enforcing. Preventing running jobs when system is on battery is also good feature. I'm working on it in vixie-cron. I'm looking forward to see new features in fcron. Replacing could be good in the future. Regards Marcela -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 08:39 EST ---
1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
3. dist tag is present.
4. build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
5. license field matches the actual license.
6. license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
7. source files match upstream:
5d871e40dc93c04e60688a06e0e143e8 museek+-0.1.12.tar.bz2
8. latest version is being packaged.
9. BuildRequires are proper.
10. package builds in mock (fc6 i386).
11. rpmlint is NOT silent.
W: museek+ strange-permission museek-launcher 0775
W: museek+ macro-in-%changelog _datadir
12. final provides and requires are sane:
museek+-0.1.12-2.fc6.i386.rpm:
_mucipherc.so
museek+ = 0.1.12-2.fc6
=
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/env
/usr/bin/python
libX11.so.6
libc.so.6
libfam.so.0
libgcc_s.so.1
libglib-2.0.so.0
libglibmm-2.4.so.1
libgobject-2.0.so.0
libm.so.6
libnsl.so.1
libogg.so.0
libpthread.so.0
libqt-mt.so.3
libsigc-2.0.so.0
libstdc++.so.6
libvorbis.so.0
libvorbisfile.so.3
libxml++-2.6.so.2
libxml2.so.2
libz.so.1
python(abi) = 2.4
museek+-0.1.12-2.fc6.src.rpm:
(none)
=
desktop-file-utils
python-devel
libxml++-devel
qt-devel
gamin-devel
swig
libvorbis-devel
PyXML
pygtk2-devel
scons
13. no shared libraries are present.
14. package is not relocatable.
15. owns the directories it creates.
16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
17. no duplicates in %files.
18. file permissions are appropriate (?) - see 11.
19. %clean is present.
20. %check is not present and no testsuite present
21. no scriptlets present.
22. code, not content.
23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
25. no headers.
26. no pkgconfig files.
27. no libtool .la droppings.
28. not a GUI app.
29. not a web app.
Please fix 11.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 09:18 EST --- Is there anything further I need to do here, or were my most recent changes sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219289] New: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-CDDB-1.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-CDDB-1.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This is actually a set of three modules to access the CDDB and FreeDB online databases of audio CD track titles and information. It includes a C extension module to fetch track lengths under Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mac OS X, Solaris, and Win32, which is easily ported to other operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||219059 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 09:30 EST --- I'm sorry to say that I won't have time to pick this up in reasonable time. I had some hopes that when my employment situation changed a month ago I would get some time to contribute to FE, but it seems like being the proud employee of a two person startup doesn't give that much free time. Feel free to carry on with the contribution as you see fit Matthias. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 10:15 EST --- Maybe it does, but relating to use with FuzzyOcr, I read this comment on the FuzzyOcr mailing list: (it is a private archive) http://lists.own-hero.net/mailman/private/devel-spam/2006-December/001091.html Someone wrote: I can confirm that - on large images, scanning times can go through the roof (over 30 secs on a pic i had... gocr0.40 needed 1 sec, 0.41 8 secs and 0.42 35 secs) And I already found 3 of 10 images which crash gocr 0.42 with Error in ocr0.c L208: idx out of range Granted, it's just one person's comment, but it seems gocr is heading in a different direction than what is good for scanning possible spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218600] Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: resapplet - Resolution Switching Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218600 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 10:20 EST --- I have decided to remove all Suse icons and keep only the original ones. Please check my latest changes http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet.spec http://people.redhat.com/rvokal/resapplet/resapplet-0.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219327] New: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/kazehakase.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/kazehakase-0.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Kazehakase is a Web browser which aims to provide a user interface that is truly user-friendly fully customizable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 11:32 EST --- Blah, sorry for the delayed response. I've been completely tied up with another project (my day job deals mostly w/the rhel kernel, not fedora). I hope to be able to look at this today, along with hopefully spinning 0.1.3 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 11:49 EST --- Note also http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-6302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 185531] Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcron, a task scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 11:53 EST --- fcron allready uses pam and it has selinux support. I don't know to what extent it works well with selinux enforcing, though, as I don't have selinux enabled. And regarding pam what exactly are you waiting for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 12:28 EST --- rpmlint is silent now, so nothing stands in the way to make this package accepted. APPROVED. Don't forget to close this ticket after rebuilding package in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 12:54 EST --- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (254698082bafe3030d07d88fb7e13fe2) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219352] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Forward.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Forward-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219353] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat lon pair
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219353 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Inverse - Calculate geographic distance from a lat lon pair Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Inverse.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Geo-Inverse-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: Calculate geographic distance from a lat lon pair Note: the Geo::* modules are requirements of Net::GPSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 14:01 EST --- sorry; password manager does not work for wiki and I forget everytime the password and was not able to file a branch request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 14:02 EST --- * Fri Nov 24 2006 Enrico Scholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.5.16-1 - updated to 0.5.16; handling of libgsf linking of main library needs some rethinking: adding such a heavy dependency just to workaround a problem in one plugin is not acceptably -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 14:54 EST ---
Spec URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/museek+.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/rpmstuff/museek+-0.1.12-3.src.rpm
New release:
- Fixed museek-launcher permissions
- Fixed %%changelog section
- Updated museek-launcher script
- Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead %%{optflags} for consistency
- Add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to make x86-64 build possible
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 15:44 EST --- Builds in x86_64 mock, too. Looks like rpmlint doesn't recognize museek-launcher as a script and still complains: W: museek+ strange-permission museek-launcher 0755 Try changing the first line to #!/bin/sh. It doesn't need bash anyway, does it? Nevertheless, it's no blocker, so... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 17:00 EST --- http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/sqlgrey-1.7.4-3.src.rpm This version addresses all obvious problems that I'm aware of. I'm still not completely sure that it works properly, but it does start up with no errors or warnings. I have it installed on a new mail server that is (hopefully) going live tomorrow, so I'll know more then. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 17:07 EST --- TeXmacs, the package for which I needed compat-guile, supports in its new version guile 1.8, so my interest in a compat-guile package has all but vanished. It would be better if someone who needs it takes up the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 17:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Thank you so much for your carefully review. This is my first time...
No problem, you are welcome.
I update the spec file as required.
Spec URL: http://yufanyufan.googlepages.com/audacious-docklet.spec
SRPM URL: http://yufanyufan.googlepages.com/audacious-docklet-0.1.1.src.rpm
I'm getting a 404 error on these.
However, After I change Release tag to 1%{?dist}, there's no fc6 in the
src.rpm. Is that correct?
Yes, but the buildsys will resolve it to fc5/6/7. You could add something like
%distname fc
%distversion %(rpm -qf --qf='%{VERSION}' /etc/redhat-release)
%dist.%{distname}%{distversion}
to your ~/.rpmmacros to also have the disttag for your local builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 17:26 EST --- From the lead Citadel developer: Mon 11 Dec 2006 12:43:30 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd Do you guy's have contact with Omar at all? Is libical dead again? Is there a new maintainer? I've sent him a few emails but I seem to have lost touch with him. He was given admin access to the SourceForge site, and we all expected that he was going to upload his code there, which would essentially make it *the* new version. Andrea Campi and Eric Busboom were happy to hand over maintainership of it to him. I really don't want to take ownership of libical if we don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 21:24 EST --- As mentioned on comment #22 my bug tracker now has support for proper user accounts. Hopefully some of the noise I'm generating on this bugzilla can be transferred over there now. See http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 21:39 EST --- Chitlesh, that you want a new reviewer means you want to take over this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219289] Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-CDDB - CDDB and FreeDB audio CD track info access in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 22:36 EST --- Thanks for the review! Package imported and built. Branches for FC-6 and FC-6 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:06 EST --- Sorry for delay - I've been re-evaluating build practices. Should have something tangible tomorrow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:11 EST --- http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky-1.4.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219119] Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyscript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219119 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:22 EST --- Hi Jochen, Would you please go ahead with the approval; a package I'm intending to submit for reviews is waiting on it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219352] Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:34 EST --- Well, any state change on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Alias: MyBashBurn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:48 EST ---
(In reply to comment #24)
E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666
--- Note that this is good and is necessary for the package,
see comment #3
Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary
users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of
user-local configuration files in $HOME.
Yes, i'm sure, this should be ignored.
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/debug
Then your RPM config or installation is broken. You don't need to
create that directory.
Yes, fixed.
You include the directory /usr/bin which is wrong, since it belongs into
the core filesystem package already.
Fixed.
All other rpmlint E: have been solved:
1) Fixed DOS/Windows-like (CRLF) end-of-line encoding with %%{__sed} tag.
2) Replaced %%{_bindir}/* tag of %%files section by %%{_bindir}/files.
3) Cleanup in %%install section.
4) Replaced %%config(noreplace) instead %%config.
Updated to 1.0-2 -- package at:
http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-3.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 23:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #25) Updated to 1.0-2 -- package at: i meant 1.0-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219352] Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Forward - Calculate geographic location from lat, lon, distance, and heading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 00:14 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS. + source files match upstream. 6142d7c7c67bf1d7aee09a40ad5e0512 Geo-Forward-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + %check used make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/baseok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=17, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 00:17 EST --- E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 (In reply to comment #25) (In reply to comment #24) E: mybashburn world-writable /etc/mybashburnrc 0666 --- Note that this is good and is necessary for the package, see comment #3 Are you kidding? Files in /etc must not be writable by ordinary users. The software is flawed, if there is no implementation of user-local configuration files in $HOME. Yes, i'm sure, this should be ignored. Bummer, I guess, I can't avoid some _very clear_ words: * A world-wide writeable file is NOT acceptable. * A package relying on such a feature is maldesigned. = Your only choices are * Fix this defect/maldesign of the package * Withdraw this review request. Unless this has been fixed, there is NO WAY for this package to make into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 00:56 EST --- Looking at the package from comment #18: 1. Might include the gpl COPYING file? 2. Might include the Changelog and CONTRIB as %doc files? I'll fix that in -3. Doesn't look like those are addressed from what I can see... Otherwise it's looking pretty good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 01:02 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143491) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143491action=view) Hack to get this package compiled against firefox With this patch applied and the spec having been changed to use firefox-devel, this package compiles. I haven't tried to use this perl-dist nor am I particularily interested in this package, so I don't know if this breaks something or not ;) Afterwards, this exposes ca. 10 further bogus Requires and *Provides*. = You also need to filter provides. Instead of using external filter scripts, I prefer using filter scripts being inlined into the spec (For details of how I do this, c.f. rt3's spec in FE's CVS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 01:02 EST --- My apologies; somehow this slipped past me. Still builds fine on rawhide, tests are run and all pass: Finished in 0.657058 seconds. 117 tests, 298 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors 1.14.4 is still current. Everything else looks good. Already did the review, and everything these still applies except that %check has been added. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 01:03 EST --- gdk-pixbuf-devel in FC6 extras no longer depends on gtk+-devel, so the BR is not redundant. What's the decision regarding -devel? IMHO it'll be nice to just make stklos Provides: stklos-devel for now. Especially if third-party modules can be compiled against the headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 01:59 EST --- Yes, I'll take over this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218367] Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guile - Guile compatibility package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218367 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 02:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Yes, I'll take over this package. Well, then please * once close this bug as NOTABUG and make this report block bug 201449 * request a new review request (of which the reporter is you) * then, change the status of this bug from NOTABUG to DUPLICATE of your new review request (this time I can notice that this bug is marked as a duplicate) Then I will review your review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
