[Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219909] New: software updater bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219909 Summary: software updater bug Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 04:31 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143842) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143842action=view) software updater output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219910] New: software updater bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219910 Summary: software updater bug Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 04:32 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143843) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143843action=view) software updater output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 04:52 EST --- Please open a new bug if you want to report a problem, this bug was dedicated to the package review, and is already closed. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219909] software updater bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: software updater bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219909 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 05:14 EST --- [ Reassigning to Pirut component and removing fedora-package-review from the CC: list. ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219915] New: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219915 Summary: Review Request: kio_resources - Kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/kio_resources/kio_resources.spec SRPM URL: http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/kio_resources/kio_resources-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: kio_resources provides the resources protocol for KDE. It allows you to browse all installed files in the standard search paths (generally .kde and /usr). The general format of a resources URL is resources:/resource-type[/relative-path]. Thus, to view all wallpapers installed on your system, both in your home directory and in the KDE installation path, you type resources:/wallpaper. If you simply want to look through all the available resource types, use resources:/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219910] software updater bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: software updater bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219910 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 08:03 EST --- All the issues you mentioned above are fixed, except the md5 problem. The md5 of up stream source http://nedudu.hu/downloads/audacious-docklet-0.1.1.tar.bz2 is 7503981a0a0ee229e5bdbe18553810db, which match exactly the one inside src.rpm. The freezing preferece window bug does exist. A review of the source code suggests that it is a bug inside audacious, but not the plugin. To be a quick fix, I create a patch that removed the preference menu entry and related stuff from the docklet plugin. I will try to notify the upstreams. The SPEC and src.rpm Spec URL: http://yufanyufan.googlepages.com/audacious-docklet.spec SRPM URL: http://yufanyufan.googlepages.com/audacious-docklet-0.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 09:24 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143854) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143854action=view) Patch to fix DBUS interface to gnome-screensaver This review seems stall. Mola, please respond within one week if you are still interested. Martin has expressed an interest in maintaining this otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 10:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -al /usr/lib/libseom.so* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21948 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20436 Nov 13 11:58 /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q beryl-vidcap beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-3 Please try 0.1.3-1. My complaint about shlib-with-non-pic-code is for 0.1.3-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 10:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) All the issues you mentioned above are fixed, except the md5 problem. Sorry, my fault. To be a quick fix, I create a patch that removed the preference menu entry and related stuff from the docklet plugin. Sounds good and the patch looks sane. As all outstanding issues are fixed now, this package is APPROVED for all versions of Fedora Extras (audaciuos is only in 6). You are now at step 9 of the new contributor's process, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-bb3314e7b80fd98f037edd46f6d1efafbb611752 I'm also willing to sponsor you, but before I do I'd like you to get more familiar with Fedora Extras, especially with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq Are you planing to release more packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #140853|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 11:01 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143855) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143855action=view) Latest mock build results on fc6 This is the latest mock build result for this package. Is it supposed to build for FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219653] Review Request: solfege - music education software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solfege - music education software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 11:29 EST --- Well, I will review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #143854|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 11:53 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143858) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143858action=view) Fixed screensaver patch, borrowed from Totem Turns out just changing the message name is not enough. I ported the code to handle the old and new screensaver API from Totem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 12:14 EST --- Thank you for you supporting all the way! It's a great honor to be a contributor. By now, I indeed has another package to release. Hopefully, all I learned here will save me a lot of time in the future. Please come by and see by the time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 12:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #22) Josh, I have completed my review. Throwing over to you :-) Sorry for such a delay. Things around here have been a bit hectic. I'll try and take a look at this tomorrow or Monday and get the ball rolling again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216102] Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 13:51 EST ---
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
0236162d53cf7f34ed341d9179e7783b TwistedConch-0.7.0.tar.bz2
0236162d53cf7f34ed341d9179e7783b TwistedConch-0.7.0.tar.bz2.1
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
x86_64/i386 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
See below - Should build in mock.
i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. Same comment as from the python-twisted-names review about the %{python}
macro
You will be maintaining these packages so it's your call, but it doesn't
do anything useful for this fedora extras spec IMHO.
2. Might add the LICENSE and NEWS files in as %doc?
3. Needs BuildRequires: python-devel for fc7/devel.
4. rpmlint says:
E: python-twisted-conch no-binary
(which can be ignored in this case)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and
inetd replacement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:09 EST ---
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (MIT)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2
ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
See below - final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
x386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. Ditto the %{python} macro comment from the other python-twisted reviews. ;)
2. Should include LICENSE and NEWS as %doc files.
3. I see that this package is providing:
portmap.so (on i386)
and
portmap.so()(64bit) (on x86_64)
Should that be the case? Or should that be filtered out?
Thats a pretty generic .so name and it's not in a standard dir
where something could link to it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:22 EST --- The one issue with this package not being built for fc6 at least is that if it was there the flumotion package could be built, which would fix a E-V-R problem with that package. (flumotion in fc5 is newer than fc6, so people who upgrade don't get an updated package). In any case I am trying to move forward all the other python-twisted-* reviews. Are there any that are not submitted yet? Or can we get this in once the other pending ones are finished? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:27 EST --- This review request should probibly be in the 'REVIEW' state, not the 'NEW' state. Fixing the blocking bugs for that... I see that the bug referred to in comment #10 is closed WONTFIX. Is there a solution to the problem there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218258] Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-docklet - a docklet plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216106] Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant
Messaging implementations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:31 EST ---
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (MIT)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
37d34da233aefe4a7a41b97bc9222b6a TwistedWords-0.4.0.tar.bz2
37d34da233aefe4a7a41b97bc9222b6a TwistedWords-0.4.0.tar.bz2.1
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
x386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. The obligatory comment about the %{python} macro. ;)
2. Should include LICENSE and NEWS as %doc files.
3. Needs BuildRequires: python-devel on fc7/devel at least.
4. rpmlint says:
E: python-twisted-words no-binary
(which can be ignored in this case)
5. Should the Requires on python-twisted-core be versioned?
I just noticed it isn't here or any of the other python-twisted-*
packages. Is core likely to upgrade in a way that is compatible
with all the subpackages?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209615] Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209615 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:35 EST --- Hey Patrice. Are you formally reviewing this package? It's assigned to you, but still blocking the FE-NEW blocker. If you are reviewing it, can you move that to FE-REVIEW? If not, can you move it back to being assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:40 EST --- This bug is a unassigned fedora extras review request, so it should be assigned to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Feel free to change it back if I am mistaken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 14:46 EST --- Hey Thomas. Any news on the mustfix/suggestion items from this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219751] Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-TurboMail - Multi-threaded mail queue manager for TurboGears applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 15:43 EST --- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-TurboMail.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SRPMS/python-TurboMail-2.0.3-2.src.rpm * Fri Dec 15 2006 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.3-2 - Add TurboGears to BuildRequires - Remove superfluous CFLAGS - Add LICENSE.txt Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, requested FC-6 CVS branch, tagged and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 16:47 EST --- This blocks FE-GUIDELINES because it awaits the drafting and ratification of guidelines for cross compilers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209615] Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmcpuload - WindowMaker dockapp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209615 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 18:48 EST --- Yes, I am formally reviewing it. I don't want the libdockapp internal library to be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219930] New: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-2.src.rpm Description: lxpanel is a lightweight X11 desktop panel. It works with any ICCCM / NETWM compliant window manager (eg sawfish, metacity, xfwm4, kwin) and features a tasklist, pager, launchbar, clock, menu and sytray. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219931] New: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219931 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GPSD - Provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Net-GPSD.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Net-GPSD-0.32-1.src.rpm Description: Net::GPSD provides an object client interface to the gpsd server daemon. gpsd is an open source GPS deamon from http://gpsd.berlios.de/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219932] New: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: DRIconf is a configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure. It allows customizing performance and visual quality settings of OpenGL drivers on a per-driver, per-screen and/or per-application level. The settings are stored in system wide and per-user XML configuration files, which are parsed by the OpenGL drivers on startup. DRIConf is written in Python with the python-gtk toolkit bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 21:31 EST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-2.src.rpm
Error 404.
I took your spec and built the package, but there are some things it don't like:
- Source0: should not use a mirror, instead use
dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/lxde/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- BR startup-notification-devel?
- In the default config two starters (firefox and pcman-fm) are not working.
Please take a look at Chung-Yen's package at
ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub/fedora/cle/6/SRPMS/lxpanel-0.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm
for a fix.
Some othe more thoughts: I think someone should also roll a pcman-fm package, we
should package the whole lx-desktop in extras. I have an icewm package that I
can offer. You and Chung-Yen should unite your powers on pcman-fm, lxpanel,
lxsession and lxmusic. What do you think?
As long as we don't have no pcman-fm package I suggest this starter should be
removed from the default config.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219164] Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontypython - TTF font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219164 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 22:00 EST --- Thanks - I'm marking resolved - NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 22:08 EST --- I don't know I will review this. however... I am always annoyed when I have to check the requirements for python related packages (because this is not done automatically by rpmbuild process). Please check the requirements for this package and add proper Requires. For instance, driconf/driconf.py includes the line: - import pygtk - This means this package should have Requires: pygobject2 (or pygtk2) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 22:14 EST --- 23856 (xarchiver): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/23856-xarchiver-0.4.9-0.1.20061213svn.fc7/ Closing NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 Bug 215241 depends on bug 217311, which changed state. Bug 217311 Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 22:20 EST --- I also found: - driconf/dri.py:infopipe = os.popen (glxinfo + dpyStr, r) - I don't know this package well, however, this line perhaps implies that this package should require glx-utils as Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219932] Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: driconf - A configuration applet for the Direct
Rendering Infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219932
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 22:33 EST ---
In reply to comments #1 and #2:
Quite right. :( Sorry I missed those... new version with those requirements
added:
New -2 packages at the same urls:
Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora-extras/driconf-0.9.1-2.fc7.src.rpm
diff of spec from previous version:
5c5
Release:2%{?dist}
---
Release:1%{?dist}
17,18d16
Requires: pygtk2
Requires: glx-utils
74,76d71
* Sat Dec 16 2006 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.1-2
- Added Requires for pygtk2 and glx-utils
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 23:38 EST --- Good news, the FuzzyOcr developers are recommending gocr 0.43 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #143858|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 23:40 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143863) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143863action=view) New screensaver patch Updated patch to 0.5.9, also fixes an upstream bug (change priv to gtv-priv) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #141214|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #141215|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 23:49 EST --- Created an attachment (id=143864) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=143864action=view) gxine-0.5.9 spec Updated spec to 0.5.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-17 02:36 EST --- gxine 0.5.9 checking for gnome-screensaver-command... /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver-command checking for DBUS... configure: error: Package requirements (dbus-glib-1) were not met: Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'dbus-1', required by 'dbus-glib', not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
