[Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 04:46 EST --- Approved, just add --enable-sequencec-diagrams=no to the %configure before you build. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:03 EST ---
Well,
Compared to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* Requires
- Check the requirement for -devel package.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./libprelude-config --libs
-L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl
--
This usually means that -devel package should require
gnutls-devel.
* Beware of Rpath
- This package fails on rpath checking.
---
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libprelude-0.9.12
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/bin/prelude-adduser
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/libprelude.so.2.9.0
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_prelude.so
10681 blocks
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
***
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild'
* to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS'
* environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values
* below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x.
*
*0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
* issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
* providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
* environments.
*0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
* nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
* SECURITY risk
*0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
* RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
* and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
* the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
* $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
* $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=top-dir /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*
* 'check-rpaths' is part of 'rpmdevtools'.
*
***
ERROR 0010: file
'/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so'
contains an empty rpath in []
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71892 (%install)
---
Prelude.so contains empty rpath and this should be removed.
* Timestamps
- Please consider to keep timestamps on installed files,
especially on text files because
* timestamps can show when the files are created and
if vendor (like you) have modified the files.
This package contain many HTML documents and header files,
so keeping timestamps on those files are preferable.
For this package, this can be done by
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL=%{__install} -c -p
cp -p AUTHORS ChangeLog README INSTALL LICENSE.README HACKING.README \
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220703] Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgtksourceviewmm - A C++ wrapper for the gtksourceview widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220703 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:07 EST --- Additional comment: Inclusion of m4 file usually means that -devel package should require automake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:42 EST --- Okay, this is a dup of something I've submitted for FE. The problem with libgladeui is the potential for clash with the current libgladeui (okay, different version I know)... As it's Christmas day, I'm doing nothing today other than with my family, so I'll hack on with this tomorrow. In the meantime, my version of the spec and srpm are available at http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3-3.1.4-1.src.rpm http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/glade3.spec Personally, I'd rather not separate out the libgladeui from the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:43 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 177747 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:43 EST --- *** Bug 220710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:55 EST --- Mamoru, do you want to continue on this package as a new submitter? I would review it if you like to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 06:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Mamoru, do you want to continue on this package as a new submitter? I would review it if you like to. No, I don't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220710] Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 - Gnome RAD library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 07:03 EST --- I took a look at the package submitted in comment 0. This is just the upstream provided package with the changelog trimmed and the Packager field replaced, this isn't quite what it considered packaging for Fedora. ;) I'll submit a new package, then - Mamoru, hope you haven't lost your patience on fail2ban and will be willing to review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 07:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) I'll submit a new package, then - Mamoru, hope you haven't lost your patience on fail2ban and will be willing to review :) Well, when you submit a new package, I will review your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 07:41 EST --- More comments: Please check the permissions of files: - E: libprelude-perl non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so 0555 - Also, check if 0444 permission of /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220743] New: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/postgis/postgis-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: PostGIS adds support for geographic objects to the PostgreSQL object-relational database. In effect, PostGIS spatially enables the PostgreSQL server, allowing it to be used as a backend spatial database for geographic information systems (GIS), much like ESRI's SDE or Oracle's Spatial extension. PostGIS follows the OpenGIS Simple Features Specification for SQL and has been certified as compliant with the Types and Functions profile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220635] Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: livecd-tools - Tools for creating Live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 13:07 EST --- It fails to build on x86_64: Nie znaleziono pliku: /var/tmp/livecd-tools-001-1-root/usr/lib64/livecd- creator/mayflower Nie znaleziono pliku: /var/tmp/livecd-tools-001-1-root/usr/lib64/livecd- creator/run-init Nie znaleziono pliku: File not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220759] New: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube-0.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: PDF Cube is an OpenGL API-based PDF viewer that adds a compiz/Keynote-like spinning cube trasition effect to your PDF presentations (including Latex, Beamer and Prosper). You can also zoom on 5 predefined areas of any presentation page with a smooth zooming effect. rpmlint gives no errors. However I am not entirely happy about explicitly stating /usr/bin/pdfcube in the files section. Is that the right way to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 19:03 EST ---
Normally, you would use
%{_bindir}/pdfcube
or
%{_bindir}/*
instead of hardcoding /usr/bin.
$ rpm --eval %_bindir
/usr/bin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 19:17 EST ---
By the way this is my first package.
I have uploaded a new version which uses %{_bindir}.
New SRPM: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/pdfcube-0.0.2-2.src.rpm
The new spec file has the same url as the old one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220759] Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdfcube - PDF viewer with a spinning cube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220759 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 19:20 EST --- Adding FE-NEEDSSPONSOR as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-350f978b25c60398e0d16100bb3da317c1fd18c3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219610] Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uncrustify-0.30 - code beautifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219610 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 23:19 EST --- $ sha1sum uncrustify-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm d4a0326889cd994e29422723fd9be1517e41edc8 uncrustify-0.30-1.fc6.src.rpm good: + builds in mock for FC6 i386 + rpmlint is silent + license is OK and correctly included + spec is very simple and clean + no shared libs and no *.la + perms and dir ownership OK + %clean OK could be improved: - the Summary: Reformat source line is a little ambiguous and it might be more helpful to say Tool for source code reformatting or similar -- but that's just a suggestion, not a blocker Its unfortunate how the config files are handled but I agree that it is an upstream problem. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219114] Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flac123 - Command-line program for playing FLAC audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219114 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 00:09 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files md5sum. No upstream is available. 1614e1d1fe5b427ffd5988ea766abcf4 flac123-0.0.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220185] Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kvm - Kernel Based Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 01:03 EST --- Suggest calling the binary 'kvm' instead of qemu-kvm, and adding a softlink to the qemu manual page. Alternatively, merge it to the qemu package. That's perhaps a little premature at this moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219872] Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: curlftpfs - user-space FTP filesystem using libcurl and FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 02:09 EST --- Interesting package. I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 219071] Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfribidi - A Python binding for GNU FriBidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219071 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 02:12 EST --- I will review this later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220393] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 02:19 EST --- I have to say that the spec file included in source tarball is far from ones which can be accepted into Fedora Extras. Please write spec file of this package by yourself according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220766] New: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220766 Summary: Review Request: ScientificPython - a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython.spec SRPM URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/ScientificPython/ScientificPython-2.6-2.src.rpm Description: ScientificPython is a collection of Python modules that are useful for scientific computing. In this collection you will find modules that cover basic geometry (vectors, tensors, transformations, vector and tensor fields), quaternions, automatic derivatives, (linear) interpolation, polynomials, elementary statistics, nonlinear least-squares fits, unit calculations, Fortran-compatible text formatting, 3D visualization via VRML, and two Tk widgets for simple line plots and 3D wireframe models. There are also interfaces to the netCDF library (portable structured binary files), to MPI (Message Passing Interface, message-based parallel programming), and to BSPlib (Bulk Synchronous Parallel programming) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
