[Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 03:57 EST --- Great! * Thu Jun 21 2007 Nikolay Vladimirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.3.13-3 - minor mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs fix Spec URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/libntlm.spec SRPM URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/libntlm-0.3.13-3.fc7.src.rpm Also used source file with correct timestamp . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222533] Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grig - a Ham Radio Control graphical user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222533 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 04:27 EST --- thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244018] Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxychains - Provides proxy support to any application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244018 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 04:42 EST --- I have updated the package to include some feedback around the -devel package and I also removed the inclusion of a .la file. * Wed Jun 20 2007 Tyler Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.1-2 - Removed proxychains-devel package as it is not needed - Removed .la file Updated SPEC SRPM links below: Spec URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/proxychains.spec SRPM URL: http://scurn.net/fedora/proxychains-3.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240699] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Alias: perl-MogileFS-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240699 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 04:45 EST --- Thanks Kevin, Sorry, I made a typo, the package is called perl-MogileFS-Client, not perl-MogileFS-client New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MogileFS-Client Short Description: Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244389] Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Bug 244371 depends on bug 244389, which changed state. Bug 244389 Summary: Review Request: sugar-datastore - Sugar Datastore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244389 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245120] New: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245120 Summary: Review Request: libgsasl - includes support for the SASL framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/libgsasl.spec SRPM URL: http://ns.bgtld.net/build/libgsasl-0.2.18-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The library is without NTLM and KERBEROS_V5 support. NTLM support can be included when libntlm( bug 245080 ) is in the repos. From the README: - KERBEROS_V5 (experimental, requires Shishi) And also I'm making this package for msmtp( bug 243631) which doesn't use kerberos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 06:52 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind Short Description: NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||182235 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 06:56 EST --- Trying to raise FE-Legal about the fltk question... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233425] Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233425 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 07:22 EST --- libMeCab.so is to be dlopen'ed and need not to have sover. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230762] Review Request: xawtv - TV applications for video4linux compliant devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xawtv - TV applications for video4linux compliant
devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230762
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 07:37 EST ---
The Source0:
http://dl.bytesex.org/releases/xawtv/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Done.
dist tag.
Oops... Added.
The compiler seems to be called only with -Wno-pointer-sign
Thanks, added.
a GUI application is thus supposed have appropriate desktop files
Hmmm... /usr/share/applcations/fedora-xawtv.desktop is already present...
New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/xawtv/xawtv.spec
New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/xawtv/xawtv-3.95-1.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244346] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities Alias: mailutils-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244346 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 07:49 EST --- Ruben, Jason ok, here are the new files. Ralf, please pardon may maybe a bit harsh words, but could you please point me to a documentation link that would say something about bumping revision numbers? I thought it is rather a matter of personal preference, as I could not find relevant resources. SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/mailutils.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/mailutils-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231267] Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stardict-dic-zh_CN - Simplified Chinese(zh_CN) dictionaries for StarDict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231267 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 08:11 EST --- its really BIG package. it took 2 hrs to download SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 08:34 EST --- Some additional comments and complete review: * rpmlint: E: fnord non-standard-gid /srv/www/fnord fnord E: fnord non-standard-dir-perm /srv/www/fnord 0750 The ownership and path are both fine. But could you please pick some more standard path than /srv? Would /var/www be a good choice? E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-httpd E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-idx E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-cgi I asked about linking against dietlibc in the comment above. * The package is named according to guidelines * Spec file name is fine * Package meets the guidelines * Package is licensed under GPL * The license text is included in documentation * To the extend I understand, the spec file is in American English * The spec file is clear, legible and easily understandable * The source matches upstream fnord-1.10.tar.bz2 = MD5(4c7d9f0e2b2f071d4687688f3018ba91) What is the Source1: http://www.fefe.de/fnord/%name-%version.tar.bz2.sig good for? * Tried compiling and running on i386 and x86_64 successfully * Dependency list seems to be complete * Package makes no use of locales * Does not provide dynamically loaded libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns the directory it creates (though correctness of the path is questionable, see comment at the top of this comment) * Contains no duplicate entries in %files * %files sections are fine and contain %defattr * Contains proper %clean section * Consistently uses macros * Contains permissable content (code) * No large quantities of documentation * %doc files are not required for correct function * No header files * No static libraries * No pkgconfig files * No library files * No devel subpackage * No libtool archives * No GUI * No confilcts about files with anny other package * %install begins with removal of PRM_BUILD_ROOT as it should * All filenames are 7bit ASCII, so also valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245160] New: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 Summary: Review Request: fann - A fast artificial neural network library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smetana.name/fann2/fann-2.0.0-0.src.rpm Description: FANN is a neural network library which implements multilayer artificial neural networks in C with support for both fully connected and sparsely connected networks. Detailed info can be found at http://leenissen.dk/fann/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243642] Review Request: schroedinger - Portable libraries for the high quality Dirac video codec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schroedinger - Portable libraries for the high quality Dirac video codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243642 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 08:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Can you tell me why this package do not BuildRequires dirac-devel ? Because schroedinger doesn't use the dirac libraries, it's a complete re-implementation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233425] Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233425 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:11 EST --- == ** APPROVED ** == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243437] Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-specimen - A simple tool to view and compare fonts installed on your system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243437 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:16 EST --- ping ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245167] New: Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245167 Summary: Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://un.codiert.org/fedora/packages/ketchup/ketchup.spec SRPM URL: http://un.codiert.org/fedora/packages/ketchup/ketchup-0.9.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Ketchup is a tool for updating or switching between versions of the Linux kernel source. It can: - Find the latest versions of numerous KernelTrees; - Calculate which patches are needed to move to that version; - Download any patches or tarballs that aren't cached; - Check GPG signatures where available; - Apply and unapply patches to get the desired result. This is my first package. I need a sponsor. regards ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:38 EST --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:47 EST ---
* Make sure this passes rpmlint (i haven't actually tested that here).
* You're lucky with the patches, most of them just got committed upstream as
well and managed to make it into the tarball. However, please copy
firefox-0.7.3-psfonts.patch from rawhide which marco said you guys need. It
applies cleanly.
* I will let you slide with static linking for now as I'm guessing you have
packages dependent on that right now, but we probably want to fix their usage to
use the frozen APIs and get rid of that. Do file a bug and cc me there to do
that.
* Provides: gecko-libs = %{version} gecko-libs --- extra gecko-libs
* Your mozconfig also should define libdir in addition to prefix. Since you are
exporting LIBDIR and PREFIX in the specfile (you copied from rawhide which is
good) you can simply copy the ac_add_options --prefix=$PREFIX and
ac_add_options --libdir=$LIBDIR
* Please move --with-system-nspr to be next to --with-system-nss for ease of
reference. Those are tied very closely together.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233425] Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mecab-java - Java binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233425 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:50 EST --- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: -- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mecab-java Short Description:Java binding for MeCab Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC:(nobody) -- -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245167] Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245167 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 09:55 EST --- * spec looks good * builds in mock * clean installations and removal APPROVED I will sponsor you. Let me know your name in fedora account system when you are ready to be sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245173] New: Review Request: babel - Tools for internationalizing Python applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245173 Summary: Review Request: babel - Tools for internationalizing Python applications Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/babel-0.8-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/babel-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Babel is composed of two major parts: * tools to build and work with gettext message catalogs * a Python interface to the CLDR (Common Locale Data Repository), providing access to various locale display names, localized number and date formatting, etc. (This can be used by TG/Genshi to i18n web apps) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||l.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:20 EST --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:21 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 177747] Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glade3 - A User Interface Designer for GTK+ and GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:54 EST --- Any news on when Glade3 becomes available for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226190] Merge Review: netatalk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netatalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226190 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:59 EST --- Actually, the way it works is that this ticket isn't closed until the reviewer approves the package. Usually the package maintainer communicates with the reviewer and says things like I applied your patch, thanks or I've fixed the following issues that you found and then the reviewer can take a look at what's in CVS and if things are good the fedora-review flag is set to '+' and then the maintainer closes the bug once the package with all of the changes has been built successfully. Under no circumstances that I can think of is the ticket closed without the reviewer signing off on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227291] Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ptunnel - Reliably tunnel TCP connections over ICMP packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227291 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:59 EST --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |s.sourceforge.net) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 11:32 EST --- Sorry, I haven't enough time for now (exams time) and I don't really know how to make these changes as it needs a complete redo of the buildchain as they don't use autoconf/automake. I thought about renaming all files but that would be useless as executables are linked against .so without soversion If you have any idea... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244978] Review Request: presto-utils - Utilities to build presto repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: presto-utils - Utilities to build presto repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 11:56 EST --- 1. Still requires kernel 2.6.19; this should be a conflicts 2. -devel requires openssl-devel and pam-devel even though it's not actually linked against either of those (and I don't see definitions that would need them in the header, but I might be reading wrong.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244978] Review Request: presto-utils - Utilities to build presto repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: presto-utils - Utilities to build presto repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217806] Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:33 EST --- This has been sitting for ages. I'll take a look. I note that 2.2.3 is out. The resulting package doesn't end up with any kind of dependency on tcl or tk. I'm not really sure if it should. There is some sort of test suite present. I have no idea whether it could be run automatically. I know essentially nothing about tcl so I don't even know how to do manual testing. Review: * source files match upstream: 5acb3ce3fd098383a10cb5f03531e625ddf342944d2a91560c9bbeb68b560c9a tktreectrl-2.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is not being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires missing dependency on tk? libtreectrl2.2.so()(64bit) tktreectrl = 2.2.1-1.fc8 = libX11.so.6()(64bit) ? %check is not present. There's some sort of test suite present; I have no idea whether it could be run in mock. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11
tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:34 EST ---
Thanks for the suggestions, I've updated the spec file and built a
libp11-0.2.2-2.src.rpm that is in the same directory as before.
I took your advice and got rid of %prerun and used the suggested %post and
%postrun command format.
The dash is fixed, and I put version numbers in the changelog as per the
guidelines.
I've added the html, README and ChangeLog files to the libp11 base package for
documentation.
I also created a libp11-devel package like you suggested and added the doc/api
directory along with the examples directory for the documentation there.
I looked for an example of a -static package, and wasn't able to find any.
Searching on my system I found several .a files that were registered in the
-devel packages so for now I did not create a -static. If anyone knows of an
example I could follow I will.
The libtool dependency should have really just been a BuildRequires
libtool-ltdl-devel since libp11 needs ltdl.h so I've removed it from Requires.
The libp11-0.2.2-2 rpm builds cleanly on x86_64 and i386. This time all four
rpms {base,-devel,-debuginfo,src} have been checked with rpmlint with no
warnings or errors found.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:35 EST --- Anything happening here? It's been well over a month since the last comment without any response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:37 EST --- This is a confusing ticket. Who is the submitter? Axel, if it's you, you should open your own ticket so that this doesn't look like Jeff's package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222365] Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-changelog - simplifies the task of maintaining ChangeLogs for projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222365 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:45 EST --- Looks OK to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245044] Review Request: Parrot - A VM for Dynamic Languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Parrot - A VM for Dynamic Languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245044 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 12:53 EST --- I could start cloning the ticket and mark duplicates to reset the reporter field, but I think it's bureaucratic overkill. You lose the comment segmentation and perhaps even the Cc fields. (it's been a while since I last cloned a bug in this bugzilla, so I'm not sure about the Cc fields). Even if it is not immediately evident who the submitter is a reviewer should not care whether this is Jeff or me whom he ponders the package's faults on, and the work flow of this particular ticket is rather natural: Someone asks for a new package and it gets processed at the same place. The worst that can happen is some bugzilla querying script counting one submission more to Jeff than to me, I think we'll manage. :) Anyway this package set (e.g. the submitted dependencies as well) seems to not really stir interest even though it was specifically asked for - it's rottening since more than half a year now. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241097] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:28 EST --- Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:33 EST --- Well, there's one more reviewer you won't be getting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:35 EST --- http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/xulrunner.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/xulrunner-1.9-5.a5pre.cvs20070519.1.src.rpm add suggested fixes rpmlint has no output on my end -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||rge.net --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:42 EST --- Seems good to me : built on Mock rpmlint is silent Package Guidelines seems to be followed except on two points : If the package doesn't already include and install its own .desktop file, you need to make your own, and include it as a Source If upstream uses vendor_id, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as vendor_id -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:46 EST --- One more thing that needs to be done which I just noticed when I tried to cvs update. All the CVS/Root files need to point to anon cvs instead of using marco's CVSRoot. :-) I'll approve this if you untar the source, cd into the top source directory, and run the following: echo :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot /tmp/cvschroot find -path */CVS/Root | xargs -n1 cp -f /tmp/cvschroot rm /tmp/cvschroot Then re-tar it up. All upstream tarballs are set up with anoncvs, so we should not break this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 13:57 EST --- we need to version with xulrunner-1.9-0.a5.5.cvs20070621 because final version will be 1.9-1. This is a downgrade in versions from the fc6 olpc repo. Solution is to remove the package from the fc6-olpc repo once this is in. the fc6-olpc repo can be considered experimental as yum upgrades would produce nonbootable machines anyway because of the way the repos were set up (we were just learning how to make a branch project off of Fedora). It is better to start fresh because of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:07 EST --- Good: + Tar ball matches with upstream. Bad - Local build fails: This may coused by the most recent version of the desktop-files-utils from rawhide: v /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/bin/gnome-network-monitor /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/sbin ln -sf consolehelper /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/bin/gnome-network-monitor + desktop-file-install --vendor '' --delete-original --dir /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/share/applications /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/share/applications/gnome-network-monitor.desktop /var/tmp/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.fc7-root-s4504kr/usr/share/applications/gnome-network-monitor.desktop: error: file contains key Category in group Desktop Entry, but keys extending the format should start with X- desktop-file-install created an invalid desktop file! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:07 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xulrunner Short Description: XUL Runner Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: OLPC-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:10 EST --- Looks good. Approving the package and sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:13 EST --- Ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:14 EST --- I'm going through a lot of packages, having things lined up so that we get cvs and approval in a timely manner is appropriate. This package is relatively simple and passes all of the checklist on my local machine except of course the multiarch one since there is little way I can test that without first being in CVS. The mock build is a SHOULD. In any case the objective is to get clean packages into Fedora and of the 37 odd packages that we have upgraded, branched or created we have been doing that. Plus on this package I left it up to you to review since you were the first to claim it. I simply went through the checklist. I would rather have others do all of our packages but of course there is a need to not block on lack of manpower. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:15 EST --- Just because the reviewer may think on first sight this was submitted by Jeff? Is Jeff known to be a reviewer eater? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:23 EST --- You can apply to sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:23 EST --- Good: + Rpmlint quite on binary package. + Filelist seems ok. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Mock build works fine. + License seems ok. Bad. - Package should not used Epoch Tag. (No blocker, becouse changing it may breaks EVR path) *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 234926 depends on bug 234882, which changed state. Bug 234882 Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:29 EST --- So is this going to be usable for the other apps in fedora that currently BuildRequire: firefox-devel ? What olpc apps currently link static to this package? Your version is slightly wrong... the 'cvs' should be at the end... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a and there should be another digit there I think. So, 1.9-5.a5pre.cvs20070519.1 should be: 1.9-0.5.a5pre.20070519cvs Since you are using a cvs checkout, can you include a comment on how to check that exact version out ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:37 EST --- So is this going to be usable for the other apps in fedora that currently BuildRequire: firefox-devel ? The current plan is to build it only on OLPC-2. Not sure what are caillon plans for Fedora. It could be used that way potentially (keep in mind this is just a pre release though). What olpc apps currently link static to this package? Hulahop links statically, sugar use hulahop python bindings. Your version is slightly wrong... the 'cvs' should be at the end... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a and there should be another digit there I think. Thanks, I'll fix it before importing. Since you are using a cvs checkout, can you include a comment on how to check that exact version out ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL We have a tarball on dev.laptop.org, is adding that as URL ok? http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/xulrunner-1.9a5pre-cvs20070519.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:38 EST --- I don't see any CVS-Admin request, so I want to ask, was is the issue. I want to have a closed bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:40 EST --- Thanks for the review and spotting those issues. (Reassigning to you as reviewer) Michael: Do let me know when you are through the red tape and ready to co-maintain. In the mean time please let me know if there is anything else I should update, etc. I am adding you in the initialcc for bugs. Package Name: ecryptfs-utils Short Description: The eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) So is this going to be usable for the other apps in fedora that currently BuildRequire: firefox-devel ? If anything requires firefox-devel it is a bug. They should require gecko-devel which the firefox in rawhide provides and I made this package provide. seamonkey provides it in the place where it is a build environment, and xulrunner in rawhide/F8 will also provide it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217735] Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: tcldict - |Review Request: tcl-tcldict |Tcl dictionary extensiuon |- Tcl dictionary extensiuon --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:46 EST --- Upstream fixed the access issues to the sources. Here's an updated package with the suggested fixes and updated to the latest version. I've also changed the name to 'tcl-tcldict' to conform with the pending tcl naming guidelines. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-tcldict-8.5.2-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-tcldict.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245167] Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ketchup - Linux Kernel source switch/update tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245167 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:55 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ketchup Short Description: Linux Kernel source switch/update tool Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244908] Review Request: olpc-utils - various utilities used by OLPC but not packaged anywhere else
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: olpc-utils - various utilities used by OLPC but not
packaged anywhere else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244908
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:57 EST ---
Ah, both Parag and I missed the %{_datadir}/olpc ownership issue. I can fix the
upstream tarball.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:59 EST --- Through heroic efforts on the part of several brave souls, in the face of seemingly insurmountable bureaucratic opposition, I am happy to report that I have finally been added to the cla_done group. I am ready to co-maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||184824 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 15:23 EST --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 15:26 EST --- Hurray. Excellent news. Can you go to this step: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-0dbf12f9c493a3f20fae545bb9c1396cb0a88053 and request sponsorship? (updated cvs request, once Michael is sponsored). Package Name: ecryptfs-utils Short Description: The eCryptfs mount helper and support libraries Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 178142] Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli - Jakarta Commons CLI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli - Jakarta Commons CLI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178142 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 15:30 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jakarta-commons-cli New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rob myers wrote: Hi Anthony- I'd like to have jakarta-commons-cli available in EPEL since checkstyle requires it. Are you interested in EPEL? If you are not interested in EPEL I would be willing to become a co-maintainer of the package for the purposes of EPEL support. Please help yourself to co-maintainership. That would be great. Do I have to do anything to make that happen? Thanks! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244908] Review Request: olpc-utils - various utilities used by OLPC but not packaged anywhere else
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-utils - various utilities used by OLPC but not packaged anywhere else https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244908 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 15:31 EST --- New package respects $(prefix), $(bindir), $(datadir), etc. and preserves timestamps: http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/olpc-utils-0.12.tar.bz2 http://people.freedesktop.org/~johnp/olpc-utils-0.12.tar.bz2.md5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 15:37 EST --- Ping Johan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239761] Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:03 EST --- python-IPy-0.53-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239761] Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version||0.53-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:11 EST --- You should be sponsored now. Removing blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:13 EST --- Rainer, would it be possible for you in future to provide a download link in such form so it would contain the tarball name and otherwise stayed the same over version changes? If not, it is nothing critical but it is nice to be able to use directly the source download URL in the package spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:16 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pybackpack Short Description: File backup manager Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:26 EST --- Looks like lots of packages didn't get that memo: repoquery -qa --srpm --repoid=development-source --whatrequires firefox-devel ruby-gnome2-0:0.16.0-6.fc8.src chmsee-0:1.0.0-0.19.beta2.fc8.src openvrml-0:0.16.5-1.fc8.src gcc-0:4.1.2-13.src liferea-0:1.2.16b-1.fc8.src eclipse-1:3.2.2-14.fc7.src kazehakase-0:0.4.7-3.fc8.src mugshot-0:1.1.45-1.fc8.src openoffice.org-1:2.2.1-18.3.fc8.src gecko-sharp2-0:0.12-1.src gnome-chemistry-utils-0:0.6.5-2.fc7.src Democracy-0:0.9.5.1-10.fc8.src gnome-python2-extras-0:2.19.1-1.fc8.src I can file bugs/poke people later unless someone else wants to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:28 EST --- Tomas, no problem: the URL is just for me to track download numbers, not really essential. The target url is always http://download.adiscon.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-version.tar.gz in the current case: http://download.adiscon.com/rsyslog/rsyslog-1.13.4.tar.gz Very early releases missed the /rsyslog path, which I got bashed for by my webmaster ;) I might be possible, though, that the url will change in the future. I think I'll see if I can change the hostname to download.rsyslog.com, which would bring us on the save side. I keep you posted when this happens (and for the forseable future, both names will be valid). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:31 EST --- It's been almost a year since the last response from the author. I will close this ticket if there is no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245081] Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libp11 - a small library for dealing with PKCS#11 tokens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245081 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:32 EST --- After some more reading I found that --disable-statics is preferred, along with rpmdevtools' rpmdev-newspec template. I've made those changes and posted updated files: Spec URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/libp11/libp11.spec SRPM URL: http://free.linux.hp.com/~mra/rpms/libp11/libp11-0.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227040] Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:39 EST --- Did anything ever happen here? fedora-review was set to '?' back in February but there have been no further comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226267] Merge Review: perl-LDAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-LDAP Alias: perl-LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:42 EST --- I think, is ok, when I close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:42 EST --- Shouldn't this ticket be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227055] Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227055 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:44 EST --- Clearing FE-NEW since this is under review, although it's been an awfully long time without any review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:45 EST --- Ping Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227034] Review Request: asm2-2.1-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2-2.1-2jpp - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227034 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227068] Review Request: jaxen-1.1-0.b7.4jpp - An XPath engine written in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jaxen-1.1-0.b7.4jpp - An XPath engine written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 16:48 EST --- Shouldn't this have been closed a long time ago? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227109] Review Request: pmd-3.6-1jpp - Scans Java source code and looks for potential problems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmd-3.6-1jpp - Scans Java source code and looks for potential problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227109 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
