[Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 02:08 EST --- I added a BuildRequires for perl-Gearman-Server (which is not in the repo yet) and enabled the tests, and it seems to work in mock. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 02:20 EST --- As I understand nobody really wants to help me out and my project stuck as many others. Well, anyway i'm gonna continue developing it... just for fun Here are links of new release: SRPM Url : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2-2.src.rpm Spec Url :http://downloads.sourceforge.net/profugus/profugus-0.2-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 02:40 EST --- Umm.. while I can review this, the trouble for me is that I don't understand Xen *completely*. Is this program surely working for you? Perhaps I cannot understand how to use this immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 02:47 EST --- it works for me, but you know that it's better to test it on different systems if you have any question fell free to ask, also i can send steps how i test that, so if you have 2 systems with xen installed i can provide information how to test it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 02:54 EST --- Ruben: Good point, ChangeLog should indeed be in %doc, it has been added. SRPM: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/SRPMS/perl-Time-Duration-1.04-4.src.rpm Jeffrey: I would be happy to have a co-maintainer. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 03:18 EST --- No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep the header if it isn't to annoying. It is not a matter of being a legalese nitpicker. I just prefer to have a license notice on the top of each and every file (except for the really insignificant ones) to avoid any possible legal ambiguities. I'll certainly remove it if it is a problem, but I would rather keep the license notice if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines
from one system to another based on CPU time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 03:32 EST ---
Actually I have only one machine :) However now I can trust you.
By the first glance at 0.2-2:
For packaging of 0.2-2, some issues must be fixed.
* Version
- On rpm packaging, 0.2-2 is considered as Version (as hyphen is
not allowed for rpm version, for this case the rpm version is 0.2.2)
So the EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) is
0.2.2-number%{?dist}.
* Descriptsion
- contains too long line (must not exceed 79 characters)
* Arch
- This package contains only text files and architecture must be
noarch.
* Macros
- Please use macros (please check %_sysconfdir, %_mandir,
%_initrddir for example)
* scripts
---
mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/rc3.d %{buildroot}/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/
---
- Why is this needed?
* Permission
- The permissions of the following files are incorrect.
-
E: profugus script-without-shebang /etc/profugus.conf
W: profugus spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/profugus.8.gz
-
* File entry
- /etc/profugus.conf is listed twice.
* Requires
- Add proper %Requires(post), etc (check: Services subsection of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets )
* defattr
Now we recommend: %defattr(-,root,root,-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 03:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep the header if it isn't to annoying. Well, okay. I don't force you to remove them. --- Requires:ORBit2*-devel* --- - Oops.. I just wanted to emphasize -devel. The name is ORBit2-devel. Sorry for confusing you.. - By the way did you modify the Source tarball itself silently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246432] New: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/blitz.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/blitz-0.9-0.1.src.rpm Description: Blitz++ is a C++ class library for scientific computing which provides performance on par with Fortran 77/90. It uses template techniques to achieve high performance. Blitz++ provides dense arrays and vectors, random number generators, and small vectors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244346] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities
Alias: mailutils-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244346
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 05:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Patrice: Much thanks for your comments.
You don't use some features, like
libgsasl, guile, or emacs-mh. I think these should be shipped.
That sounds sane. I will add those.
I think it is bad to conflict with nmh. I think that
you should use
--with-mh-bindir
instead.
This was intentional. If you look at the spec file, I already use
--with-mh-bindir=%{_bindir}, that overrides the default bin/mh location
of mh compatibility files. The original reason was that rpmlint objected
having a subdirectory of bin. I tend to agree with rpmlint -- I would not
call having binaries such weird places as subdirectories of bin a good
practice. Moreover, I think there is no use of having both mh-s installed,
at a time, and conflicts are about the best and most standard way to deal
with situations such as this.
If not conflicting with nmh is important for you, and you insist on removing
the conflict, please either suggest an alternative resolution, or explain
where would you put the conflicting files and why.
Some suggestions:
* put the %post and friends before the %files section. There is no
reason, except that it is how all the other spec files are done
in fedora.
That's fair, I'll move that.
* use wildcards for man pages and info pages in %files, like
%{_infodir}/%{name}.info*
%{_mandir}/man1/popauth.1*
* don't use .gz in the install-info %preun, install-info is able to
figure out itself what compression it should use.
I was already wondering wheter manual pages are always gzipped. Thus,
thanks for the explanation and be sure I'll change it. I will probably have
to change it also in some other packages.
* use
rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.a
instead of
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.a
that way build will break if something changed upstream.
Makes sense. Will change that.
* It seems to me that COPYING.LESSER should be in libs %doc
I also guess that devel subpackage is LGPL licensed.
I would also add COPYING in all the subpackages, since
the doc subpackage may not be installed.
Alternatively you could have all packages depend on -doc
since it is tiny, and more like a common package that really
a doc package in my opinion.
I was thinking about the second option already, though it was for different
reasons and first one also makes sense. I'll think for a while about this
and pick one of the solutions for the next revision of the package.
* since this package is heavily split it would be nice, in my
opinion, to try to have a similar layout than in other repos.
I haven't really found other repos packaging mailutils, except
for alt linux, but I may have missed something. Maybe you could
use the split from the upstream specfile, as long as it makes sense
(no -dev subpackage, for example).
Will look at this later.
The revised packages with most of your suggestions incorporated will be
available either in today's evening (CET), or tomorrow.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 05:31 EST --- I added a note to bug 239004. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243951] Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbm2l7k - Converts PBM stream to Lexmark 7000, 7200 and 5700 printer language Alias: pbm2l7k-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 05:48 EST --- Thanks Marek and Jason. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226294] Merge Review: php
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: php Alias: php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226294 Bug 226294 depends on bug 246210, which changed state. Bug 246210 Summary: php-dbase conflict with php-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246210 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243947] Review Request: c2050 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2050 printer language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c2050 - Converts bitcmyk data to Lexmark 2050 printer language Alias: c2050-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 05:57 EST --- Thanks Marek and Kevin. The package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241081] Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 05:59 EST --- I discovered by testing the package that I made some mistakes on the files (I had lost the html interface) There is a corrected version who is working: SPEC: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-7.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 06:12 EST --- Kevin, are there any news after last FESCo discussion? (In reply to comment #37) cvs done. Please note that FESCo is planning on discussing if rsyslog should replace sysklogd in it's thursday meeting. You might hold off on building until after that. Also, be very carefull when pushing to F-7. I don't think we want to replace sysklogd in a released version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246227] Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brutus-keyring - small and simple keyring daemon based upon libgcrypt Alias: brutus-keyring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 06:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) No, I've noticed that, but I would really like to keep the header if it isn't to annoying. Well, okay. I don't force you to remove them. Thanks :-) --- Requires:ORBit2*-devel* --- - Oops.. I just wanted to emphasize -devel. The name is ORBit2-devel. Sorry for confusing you.. Silly me... - By the way did you modify the Source tarball itself silently? Sigh, yes. The spec file revision number didn't make it to the tar-ball version string. I've now changed my ways and will increase the third version digit for each spec file modification so that any source change will be reflected by the tar-ball version. New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SPECS/brutus-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/sites/default/files/downloads/dist/brutus-keyring/Fedora%207/SRPMS/brutus-keyring-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 08:10 EST --- I just uploaded the new texlive packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ Main features/differences from the previous version: 1. dropped former texjive zip list for the texmf trees and texlive now uses the zips generated from the scheme-tetex.tpm from upstream 2. reintroduced texlive-errata updating scheme Tom, this means the pdflatex will work for you since fmtutil now regenerates all fmt files correctly due to correct dependency resolution. Seems like we have the first functional texlive release based on scheme-tetex now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 08:19 EST --- Matej, could you please try it again with the new (0.4) packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/ It should build successfully. Main features/differences from the previous version: 1. dropped former texjive zip list for the texmf trees and texlive now uses the zips generated from the scheme-tetex.tpm from upstream 2. reintroduced texlive-errata updating scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 08:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) Okay, * For this package, the last remaining is (I just found): --- /usr/share/doc/ppl/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/ppl/TODO: ISO-8859 English text --- Please change to UTF-8 (by iconv for example). Done. I have simply changed http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-docfiles.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 09:40 EST --- I don't think you're doing anything wrong. It looks like the package was in extras pre-FC5, but was moved to core in FC5. I'll request that the package be added to those branches in CVS. Thanks for catching this. Package Change Request == Package Name: New Branches: FC-5, FC-6, F-7, devel Guys, some of the branches for this package were apparently lost when extras was merged. Perhaps because the package went from extras - core. I assume the proper thing to do is request that it be added to those branches, like I did above. If not, please do whatever the right thing is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 09:43 EST --- Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new package review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] New: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-2.src.rpm %description Qtpfsgui is a Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging. $ rpmlint RPMS/qtpfsgui-*1.8.9-2*.rpm SRPMS/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-2.src.rpm $ echo $? 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 10:01 EST --- Currently working on bug 241403 as my primary sponsorship bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220743] Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis - Geographic Information Systems Extensions to PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 10:46 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: postgis New Branches : F-7 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 10:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #45) Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. New SPEC: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl.spec New SRPM: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-9.src.rpm And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new package review request. I am trying to select a project for which I have a minimum of qualification, but I am having problems: all such projects seem to have requests that are either stuck (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570) or by people that is unlikely to need my reviewe (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679). I am confused about how to proceed: any hints? Meanwhile I am reading again the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: samba
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 11:38 EST ---
It seems that winbind name changes must be applied for all releases...
Consider the system boot/shutdown process. According to /etc/inittab,
l0:0:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 0 or
l6:6:wait:/etc/rc.d/rc 6
In /etc/rc.d/rc script we have such a fragment:
---start here
# First, run the KILL scripts.
for i in /etc/rc$runlevel.d/K* ; do
check_runlevel $i || continue
# Check if the subsystem is already up.
subsys=${i#/etc/rc$runlevel.d/K??}
[ -f /var/lock/subsys/$subsys -o -f /var/lock/subsys/$subsys.init ] \
|| continue
# Bring the subsystem down.
if LC_ALL=C egrep -q (killproc |action ) $i ; then
$i stop
else
action $Stopping $subsys: $i stop
fi
done
---end here---
For winbind we have /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K35winbind symlink. The subsys value,
computed from this filename, is winbind. But when we check
/var/lock/subsys/$subsys , we find nothing, as /var/lock/subsys/winbindd
exists there (double-d at the end instead of one).
IOW, it seems that with winbindd name, the init script will not be invoked for
stop at halt/reboot . And the similar when changing between runlevels (from 3
to 5 etc.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #154749|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 11:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=158345) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158345action=view) .spec file changes to work wiith winbindd to winbind renaming This variant seems more safe. First, just duplicate new subsys lock, if old is present, then remove the old lock, if it still exists. No idea what about FC6 (and RHEL?) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243831] Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsyslog - the enhanced syslogd for Linux and Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 11:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #39) There was high level discussion about features in general, but nothing specific to rsyslog. ;( I will ask for it to be added to the schedule for this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235501] Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jsdoc - Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235501 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:07 EST --- JSDoc-1.10.2-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:11 EST --- pybackpack-0.5.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version||0.5.1-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:11 EST --- Well, would you choose from newer review requests of others, not choosing older ones? (Currently the newest review requests is bug 246460) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:12 EST --- libntlm-0.3.13-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245080] Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libntlm - library that implement NTLM authentication derived from Samba sources. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version||0.3.13-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:16 EST --- Ping Andres, Please put a CVS Admin request on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171801] Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspectrum, lib765 and libdsk - libraries required for the fuse-emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171801 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:58 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libspectrum Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Change Request == Package Name: libdsk Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Package Change Request == Package Name: lib765 Updated Fedora Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Note, the review requests appear to have taken place for all three packages under the same Review bug, so I'm placing all 3 CVS requests here. The current maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) appears to be AWOL at the moment due to personal reasons. I was given explicit permission to take over fuse-emulator and fuse-emulator-libs but lib765, libdsk and libspectrum also need updating in order to maintain the former. The original maintainer should be left as co-maintainer in case he wishes to resume in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 13:04 EST --- OK: I will try to write a review for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 13:45 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: slim Short Description: Simple Login Manager Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 13:52 EST --- Axel - Are you sure the %bcond_with/without macros work in the Fedora build system? Don't seem to do anything for me in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:03 EST --- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:05 EST --- Being sponsored by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bug 241403) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:09 EST --- Very rapid comment: * Don't write the packages to Requires explicitly which are selected by the dependency check of the libraries checked by rpmbuild itself. Perhaps all the Requires currently written is not needed. ( Currently I may have no time to review this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:26 EST --- These are a bit strange. Upstream has these in their Makefile.am as:: languages_DATA = $(LANGUAGES) language.rng language2.rng language.dtd \ check.sh convert.py After consulting upstream, I've removed these. * Missing BuildRequire: pcre-devel I've patched configure now to use the GRegex provided by GLib 2.13.x, and it builds fine in mock without pcre-devel * Only a subset of the *.lang files pass the check.sh script. The check script fails for old-format language specs. The library can handle both formats. In this case, the Guidelines specify that the latest version should be [basename] and previous versions should be [basename][version]. The guidelines are misguided here... New versions up at http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gtksourceview/gtksourceview2-1.90.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246351] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gnokii - plugin for using gnokii with opensync
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gnokii - plugin for using gnokii with opensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246351 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246289] Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game Scorched Earth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atanks - Remake of a classic DOS game Scorched Earth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246289 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:31 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:35 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222648] Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugin-fc - Future Composer plugin for Audacious https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222648 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:39 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246302 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:42 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245431] Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:47 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246460] Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical user interface that provides a workflow for HDR imaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246460 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|qtpfsgui - A Qt4 graphical |Review request: qtpfsgui - A |user interface that provides|Qt4 graphical user interface |a workflow for HDR imaging |that provides a workflow for ||HDR imaging --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Very rapid comment: * Don't write the packages to Requires explicitly which are selected by the dependency check of the libraries checked by rpmbuild itself. Perhaps all the Requires currently written is not needed. Sorry about that; fixed up now. ( Currently I may have no time to review this) No problems. Thanks for the sponsorship. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qtpfsgui/qtpfsgui-1.8.9-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 02 2007 Douglas E. Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.8.9-3 - removing explicit Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:50 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:54 EST --- cvs done. Note that you are supposed to set the fedora-cvs flag to ?, not +. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:57 EST --- 1.) Local build works for me (F7, x86_64) 2.) I don't unserstand the advantage of texlive-errata updating scheme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 14:58 EST --- Comment #3 looks like it's in the wrong review request? cvs done. Note again that you should set fedora-cvs to ? and a cvsadmin will set it to + when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245432] Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomcrypt - comprehensive, portable cryptographic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:00 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:01 EST --- SPEC provided and spec in SRPM difer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fedora]$ diff postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec 14d13 BuildArch:noarch Which is right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data-minimal - VDrift minimal data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:02 EST --- Known issue, see vdrift review bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245743] Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:05 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:07 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:09 EST --- Hello, (In reply to comment #9) Which is right? Ouch. BuildArch: noarch is ok. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 222478] Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofsip-cli - SIP VoIP/IM example client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222478 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:10 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:12 EST --- Yes, the bcond macros could at most deactivate the Java builds, but the error is due to the Java build being attempted. You can see from the build logs that the bcond macros didn't mess up anything. Could you reproduce the failure of the Java builds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 229322] Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool-ha : Pgpool-HA uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:18 EST --- Ok. But. . . [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba postgresql-pgpool-ha.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35249 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/pgpool-ha-1.1.0.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35249 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export FFLAGS ++ find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=noarch-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --bindir=/usr/bin --sysconfdir=/etc --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking for /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat... yes checking for psql... /usr/bin/psql checking for pgpool... /usr/bin/pgpool configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating src/Makefile + make -C src make: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgpool-ha-1.1.0/src' sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#/usr/bin/psql#g' pgpool.monitor.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#/usr/bin/pgpool#g' pgpool.monitor sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#/usr/bin/psql#g' pgpool.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@#/usr/bin/pgpool#g' pgpool make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgpool-ha-1.1.0/src' + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd pgpool-ha-1.1.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/postgresql-pgpool-ha-1.1.0-1.fc7-root-limb + cd src + make install /usr/bin/install -c -m 755 pgpool /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/ /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/pgpool': Permission denied make: *** [install] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52313 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245694] Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phlickr - Phlickr is a PHP5 based api kit used with the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245694 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:14 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D
visualization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:47 EST ---
I could reproduce the java failure if I explicitly set with_java. I fixed it by
removing %{?_smp_flags} from the make command. Looks like a parallel build
dependency issue - probably trying to compile the wrappers before they are all
generated.
Also, why not build with OSMesa? I believe it is only FC-5 that didn't have
OSMesa support. Compiles fine for me on devel.
Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version like is done with paraview.
Probably not a big win though since I think most mpi users will compile their
own.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246386] Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ois - Open Input System, OO gaming input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 15:52 EST --- Imported and build, closing. Note I'm also building this F-7 updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: ctags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225669
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |medium
Priority|normal |medium
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:13 EST ---
+ rpmlint
W: ctags summary-ended-with-dot A C programming language indexing and/or
cross-reference tool.
E: ctags tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: ctags non-utf8-spec-file ctags.spec
W: ctags summary-ended-with-dot A C programming language indexing and/or
cross-reference tool.
E: ctags tag-not-utf8 %changelog
E: ctags-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog
Comment:
* fix utf-8 with iconv(1)
* Both Summary and description should be reworked, they don't match the package
as of
today.
+ naming : ok
+ guidelines
* changelog is 10 years old (sic!), could be a be shorter?
* disttag is missing
* source url is wrong, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2
* I prefer this buildroot:
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
* add %{?_smp_mflags} to make
* preserve timestamp on man files (cp -p/install -p)
* don't use %makeinstall
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002
* don't shiop INSTALL
the rest seems ok.
+ License: ok
+ American English: ok, however as noted the summary and description is outdated
and should be fixed.
+ legible: ok
+ src: md54sum: 9026a6c6950751bc4fd1be37e8a2070f : ok
+ build: ok (with correct build opts)
+ buildreq: ok
+ dirs and dups: ok
+ I prefer %defattr(...) as %defattr(-, root, root, -)
+ clean: ok
+ debuginfo: ok
Then a issue maybe outside the scope of this review, I really like to see etags
enabled and
included. Perhaps in a ctags-etags subpackage like this:
%package etags
Summary: Exuberant Ctags for emacs tag format
Group: Development/Tools
Requires: ctags = %{version}-%{release}
%description
This package will generate tags in a format which GNU Emacs understand,
it's a alternativ implementation of the GNU etags program.
Note: some command line options is not compatible with GNU etags.
Then change %configure line to include --enable-etags .
There are several other /usr/bin/etags coming from emacs and xemacs,
hence you must use alternatives to setup /usr/bin/etags.ctags as
alternativ. I can help with the details if you want, it goes
something like this:
move files (after install):
mv /usr/bin/etags to /usr/bin/etags.ctags
mv /usr/share/man/man1/etags.1 /usr/share/man/man1/etags.ctags.1
set up alternatives with slave (in %post and %preun):
alternatives --install /usr/bin/etags etags /usr/bin/etags.ctags 20 \
--slave /usr/share/man/man1/etags.1.gz etags-etagsman
/usr/share/man/man1/etags.ctags.1.gz
alternatives --remove etags /usr/bin/etags.ctags
With low prio as 20, xemacs and emacs should ne affected.
and included the files with
%files etags
%defattr(-, root, root, -)
%doc COPYING
%{_bindir}/etags.ctags
%{_mandir}/man1/etags*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D
visualization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #62)
I could reproduce the java failure if I explicitly set with_java.
Yes, that's the default if you don't pass anything on the command line.
I fixed it by removing %{?_smp_flags} from the make command. Looks like a
parallel build dependency issue
Argh, I hate %{?_smp_flags}. I only added it because I was hoping to get the
review happen due to comment #5. I should ask the FPC to forbid smp_flags.
Anyway thanks for spotting this!
Also, why not build with OSMesa?
But, it's already built with it. The default it to build with java and OSMesa.
Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version
Yes, but let's first make the first entry :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245743] Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-isprelink - Python module to determine if a file has been prelinked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245743 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:17 EST --- Packages imported and builds submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246524] New: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libquikgrid-4.0-1.src.rpm Description: This library contains the grid generator (called xpand) and contouring routine (called contour) in the QuikGrid program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246525] New: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/mini.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/mini-8.1-1.src.rpm Description: The Mini library is the core of the high-performance terrain renderer which is described in the paper Real-Time Generation of Continuous Levels of Detail for Height Fields. The Mini library applies a view-dependent mesh simplification scheme to render large-scale terrain data at real-time. For this purpose, a quadtree representation of a height field is built. This quadtree is also utilized for fast view frustum culling and geomorphing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246526] New: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/minizip.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/minizip-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246527] New: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 Summary: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/vtp-070331-1.src.rpm Description: The VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) software consists of a collection of applications and libraries related to virtual terrain generation and display. The main libraries include vtdata and vtlib, while the primary applications are VTBuilder and Enviro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libquikgrid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||mini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||minizip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246527] Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications Alias: vtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||246524, 246525, 246526 Alias||vtp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246525] Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||246527 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||246527 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||246527 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #63) (In reply to comment #62) Also, why not build with OSMesa? But, it's already built with it. The default it to build with java and OSMesa. Hmm, guess I really just don't understand %bcond. Next, you might consider providing a -mpi version Yes, but let's first make the first entry :) Yeah, yeah... :-) BTW - I usually do make VERBOSE=1 with my cmake packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217735] Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217806] Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tk-tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193712] Review Request: sos
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||tenment.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |ail.com)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:56 EST --- Thanks for the review! I am very busy this week, but will finish the package during the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |ail.com)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 16:57 EST --- Thanks for the review! I am very busy this week, but will finish the package during the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245655] Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 17:03 EST --- Thanks Kev, I must have been sleeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 Bug 245697 depends on bug 245655, which changed state. Bug 245655 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman - Distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245655 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246526] Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minizip - Minizip manipulates files from a .zip archive Alias: minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 17:03 EST --- Hi I think that since minizip is included in the contrib directory of zlib, you should request the zlib maintainer to enable minizip... Mostly because he may enable it sooner of later if possible... This seems to be stated here: http://www.winimage.com/zLibDll/minizip.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246356] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Client-Async - Asynchronous Client for the Gearman distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 17:15 EST --- I added a BuildRequires for perl-Gearman-Server (#245697, will build that one toninght for rawhide) and enabled the tests, and all test pass in mock for devel. New version: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Gearman-Client-Async-0.94-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245708
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 17:21 EST ---
MUST:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - ***
Upstream package name appears to be 'tgt'. While scsi-target-utils is certainly
more informative, is there a particular reason for the disconnect? I also notice
the upstream project name is 'stgt' while upstream source is 'tgt'.
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
- License - OK
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - ***
A copy of GPL2 is not included. Doesn't appear to be included upstream, either.
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK
- Package needs ExcludeArch - No
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - N/A
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A
- .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A
- .la files are removed. - N/A
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output. ***
Source rpm:
W: scsi-target-utils strange-permission tgtd.init 0755 - can be ignored
Binary rpm:
E: scsi-target-utils init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd
E: scsi-target-utils init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd
See below.
E: scsi-target-utils incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd tgtd]
Typo?
W: scsi-target-utils no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/tgtd
See below.
W: scsi-target-utils incoherent-init-script-name tgtd
Not sure what to make of this warning.
- final provides and requires are sane:
See below about chkconfig. Otherwise reasonable.
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - OK
- Should build on all supported archs - only tested x86_64
- Should function as described. - did not test
- Should have sane scriptlets. - ***
Missing the proper scriptlets for adding/removing scripts. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
See the section on chkconfig Requires: there as well; as it is now, they're
wrong.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. -
N/A
- Should have dist tag - OK
- Should package latest version - OK
Other comments:
1. Versioning - this uses 0.1 for the package version. Upstream versioning is
done by date; the package should reflect that.
2. The init script - various issues
1) doesn't actually do anything sane if it fails to start
2) doesn't have a reload entry (if it's possible)
3) doesn't use the proper LSB return codes
3. Xen support - is not built. Should it be?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245697] Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gearman-Server - Function call router and load balancer Alias: perl-Gearman-Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245697 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217735] Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 17:41 EST --- Imported and built on rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246537] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246537 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Output - Utilities to test STDOUT and STDERR messages Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Output/perl-Test-Output.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Output-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Output provides a simple interface for testing output sent to STDOUT or STDERR. A number of different utilies are included to try and be as flexible as possible to the tester. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
