[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:53 EST ---
glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:51 EST ---
glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:52 EST ---
Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-2/nettle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-2/nettle-1.15-2.fc8.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-tidy -  Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML 
tidy project


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summary|Review Request: python-tidy |Review Request: python-tidy
   |-  Python wrapper for tidy, |-  Python wrapper for tidy,
   |from the HTML tidy project  |from the HTML tidy project




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:44 EST ---
BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license
for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags.

BLOCKER: Package does not match package-naming-guidelines. Your package is named
python-tidy and upstream package uTidylib. I see, that you are using just one
part from this source, but I don't know, if we can mix that this way.

BLOCKER: python-tidy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libtidy
Add version info for libtidy requirement.

Other comments:
I think a better group for this package is Development/Languages .

Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3

This code is not required:
%{python_sitelib}/tidy
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 9
%{python_sitelib}/%{oname}-%{version}-py%{pyver}.egg-info

You can use %{python_sitelib}/*

As I don't know, what to do with this license mix, I can't approve you package
now. If you can give me a link to more information.

You can ask author to remove path.py from this package and rename it's package
as you need. Otherwise you need to fix these problems.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433182] New: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182

   Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight
file manager
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm-0.3.5.23-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: 
PCMan File Manager is an extremly fast and lightweight file manager 
which features tabbed browsing and user-friendly interface.

koji scratch build results:
for dist-f9:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432895
for dist-f8-updates-candidate:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432894

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:34 EST ---
Thanks John

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:37 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: aldo
Short Description: Ham radio morse code tutor
Owners: bjensen,sconklin
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: sindrepb
Cvsextras Commits: Yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:28 EST ---
glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:24 EST ---
+ Builds on development i386
+ rpmlint clean

+ License GPLv2+
+ Source matches
+ Summary and description
+ Proper macros
+ Proper file ownership

Quite straightforward.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-17 02:24 EST ---
glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433174] New: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174

   Summary: Review Request: squeeze -  A modern and advanced archive
manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 

Squeeze is a modern and advanced archive manager for the
Xfce Desktop Environment. Its design adheres to the Xfce
philosophy, which basically means Squeeze is designed
to be both fast and easy to use.

rpmlint says: 

squeeze.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding 
/usr/share/doc/squeeze-0.2.2/TODO

Which I will fix with iconv at reviewer request, but I think is too minor to 
bother with.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433170] New: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170

   Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+
Interface
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gpsk31.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gpsk31-0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Hamradio PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433167] New: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167

   Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client
with curses color support
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/colrdx.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/colrdx-1.02-2.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Colrdx is a simple client for amateur radio dx-clusters. In a 
split-screen display you can type commands for the cluster in the bottom part. 
Messages from the dx-cluster will appear in the main window. There is also a 
status line at the top with some basic information.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 23:33 EST ---
Ah... as libcrystalspace-1.2.so is polluted by GPLv2+,
the tag "LGPLv2+" seems almost nonsense.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 23:23 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 23:20 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433165] New: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165

   Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/aldo.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/aldo-0.7.5-2.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Aldo is a morse code learning tool released under GPL, which 
provides four type of training methods:

   1. Classic exercise : Identify random characters played in morse code.
   2. Koch method : Two morse characters will be played at full speed
  (20wpm) until you'll be able to identify at least 90 percent of
  them. After that, one more character will be added, and so on.
   3. Read from file : Identify the morse code generated from a file.
   4. Callsign exercise : Identify random callsigns played in morse code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification 
software


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 22:41 EST ---
Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar.spec
SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar-0.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm

fixed.

- added missing BR perl(XML::Parser), desktop-file-utils


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and 
breeding game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 22:05 EST ---
The package from comment #4 looks all good to me... 

This package is APPROVED. 

Just out of curiosity, is upstream planning further development? 
The upstream source seems to have last been updated in 2003. ;( 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification 
software


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 20:37 EST ---
Rebuild failed.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432105

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433161] New: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161

   Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel
or serial port
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/cwdaemon.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/cwdaemon-0.9.4-3.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Cwdaemon is a small daemon which uses the pc parallel or serial 
port and a simple transistor switch to output morse code to a transmitter from 
a text message sent to it via the udp internet protocol.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433160] New: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160

   Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an
ax.25 enabled computer
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/ax25-tools.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc8.src.rpm
Description: ax25-tools is a collection of tools that are used to configure an 
ax.25 enabled computer. They will configure interfaces and assign callsigns to 
ports as well as Net/ROM and ROSE configuration.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433159] New: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159

   Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/ax25-apps.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc8.src.rpm
Description: This package provides specific user applications for hamradio that 
use AX.25 Net/ROM or ROSE network protocols:

 * axcall: a general purpose AX.25, NET/ROM and ROSE connection program.
 * axlisten: a network monitor of all AX.25 traffic heard by the system.
 * ax25ipd: an RFC1226 compliant daemon which provides encapsulation of AX.25 
traffic over IP.
 * ax25mond: retransmits data received from sockets into an AX.25 monitor 
socket.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 19:47 EST ---
libax25-0.0.11-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 19:42 EST ---
unixcw-2.3-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 19:38 EST ---
unixcw-2.3-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 18:44 EST ---
Thank you Steve, Mamoru, Jeroen and Kevin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 18:06 EST ---
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.

I believe the license is LGPLv2+, not GPLv2+ as you have.

There's no reason to have a build dependency on glibc-common; it's installed
by default.  I guess it doesn't hurt anything to have it there, though.

For the -devel description, it helps to say something about the package
including headers needed to compile programs using nettle.

I see you deleted the static library, but I wonder if that actually leaves any
point to this package.  After all, what use are the headers if there's nothing
to link against?  If all you have left are the three executables then I don't
think you can properly call this a library.

There's a test suite in the package which is easy to run, so this needs to be
done.  Just put "make check" in a %check section.

All of the documentation is duplicated between the main and -devel packages.
You need to decide which files are useful for development and which (like the
license) are needed in the main package.  But there's no point in installing
everything twice. 

* source files match upstream:
   d6e540bf4acc857a3b09580e7f61822d352ee83c119579bf7333f0a785f7d9ac  
   nettle-1.15.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
X license field does not match the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (glibc-common is redundant)
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  nettle-1.15-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   nettle = 1.15-1.fc9
  =
   /bin/sh
   /sbin/install-info
   libgmp.so.3()(64bit)

  nettle-devel-1.15-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   nettle-devel = 1.15-1.fc9
  =
   nettle = 1.15-1.fc9

X %check is not present, but a test suite is present.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
X Many duplicated files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (install-info)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 431215] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for 
Perl::Tk


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431215





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 17:36 EST ---
Any update here?  I gave review feedback on three of your tickets only a couple
of hours after you submitted them; one was approved and two did not build, and
yet there's been no response from you on any of them.  Why submit a package and
then ignore the almost immediate feedback you received?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and 
filename operations


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 17:19 EST ---
I figured this wouldn't build because of the ocaml update, but it turns out
that it builds fine.  rpmlint has only the two weird complaints above; someone
who understands what ocaml is doing really needs to get with the rpmlint
maintainer and figure out the source of these complaints.  Maybe it just
doesn't like the fact that the only thing directly in _libdir is a directory.

There's a test suite there; I tried running it but it seems to need the
package to be installed before it works, and I don't know if it's possible to
adjust the various search paths to pick up the files from the build directory.

There are several grammatical errors in the description which should be easy
to fix up.

I had hoped to find a better upstream URL than one pointing to a list of files
for download, but the wiki that upstream has doesn't seem to have any actual
content.

As far as I can tell, the License is LGPLv2+ plus some type of exception, so I
guess this is "LGPLv2+ with exceptions".  In addition, the COPYING file needs
to be added to the package.  You should probably add AUTHOR, CHANGELOG and
TODO as well.  I'm not sure about the stuff in the "website" directory.

I can't think of any better way to handle the broken build system of this
package, and you've adequately commented things, so that's OK.

The README file is duplicated between packages, but we already decided I
wouldn't block on this.

* source files match upstream:
   4b3929f758dac11bebdcbb84963ab44e2a5ebf06023665dd511d61b19e9654b8
   ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* Follows ocaml packaging guidelines
* summary is OK.
X description could use some grammar fixes.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
X license field does not match the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
X license text should be included in the package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint seems to have only bogus complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   ocaml(CygwinPath) = 55504b4f452dc9b72bcd7564a4c5a991
   ocaml(CygwinPath_lexer) = 29edb3b5196b78e256fdcbafa566486b
   ocaml(CygwinPath_parser) = d7c4325a803605bd4737615702dcb060
   ocaml(FilePath) = 80389f0c61bde05b590de9a464aa1831
   ocaml(FilePath_type) = b20c6b0e73bf51cf8d25a2f256443dfc
   ocaml(FileUtil) = bd8589f4d97317061dd24d80db6eeacc
   ocaml(GenericPath_lexer) = d564536f943cee33d33f51880f85406d
   ocaml(GenericPath_parser) = 177c3bf79cd035b170e1d2efce3a36ff
   ocaml(MacOSPath) = 6eecbacbd1f32d7cbddb7f1e269358b7
   ocaml(MacOSPath_lexer) = 473b7b6c310c611393a88e6922dfc897
   ocaml(MacOSPath_parser) = 323e664f9989fd08de7097f80bc34995
   ocaml(Str) = 56bb7ee61b2da83d42394686e3558fe4
   ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599
   ocaml(UnixLabels) = daaededf8793acd8b374c4e7c5d1fd16
   ocaml(UnixPath) = 1538fbea534e0ac1e7f3a48c81330a6c
   ocaml(UnixPath_lexer) = 52138249abfd7fd19243bae955fec96a
   ocaml(UnixPath_parser) = 34b22f7becddd052a253243d516b2685
   ocaml(Win32Path) = ef3947425c94dc4e80a851401ab0
   ocaml(Win32Path_lexer) = 934bf4ebb71efb7a397e9fd8ce16a1b2
   ocaml(Win32Path_parser) = b55b3f0165af59f53b11c55fa4f2495d
   ocaml-fileutils = 0.3.0-2.fc9
  =
   ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5
   ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3
   ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2
   ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1
   ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4
   ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3
   ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948
   ocaml(Map) = dedde7683d54ae7db1eb97cc868dd047
   ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d
   ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a
   ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57
   ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341
   ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3
   ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809
   ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab
   ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28
   ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1

  ocaml-fileutils-devel-0.3.0-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   ocaml-fileutils-devel = 0.3.0-2.fc9
  =
   ocaml-fileutils = 0.3.0-2.fc9

* %check is not present; upstream test suite cannot easily be run.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
? README file is duplicated.
* file permissions are appro

[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale 
eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:48 EST ---
arpack-2.1-7.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale 
eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:48 EST ---
arpack-2.1-7.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:45 EST ---
Well, if you want to defer this it is ok. 

However, please note you just need one spec and one review. I was only
suggesting that the single spec file would build a number of binary RPMS instead
of a single one.

This is done in several other packages and (more or less) detailed in
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch10s04.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:38 EST ---
fldigi-2.09-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:39 EST ---
Change made. Tagged, built for devel and F-8, and pushed to F-8.

Thanks!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it)

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:35 EST ---
Hi, this is an informal review, I can't approve your package or sponsor you.

[-] Don't use %define for name and version
[-] Summary should'n end with a dot
[-] Group Applications/Telephony doesn't exist, use one of the groups in 
cat /usr/share/doc/rpm*/GROUPS
[-] Source tag should contain a link to the original tarball:
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3.tar.gz
[-] Recommended Buildroot is 
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[-] Don't require coreutils, binutils, bash, gawk, bc, uucp, bluez-utils, 
bluez-libs, libXtst. 
RPM will find them itself.
[-] Add libdir to configure script:
 ./configure --libdir=%{_libdir} 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml)

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network 
peer-to-peer client (ocaml)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:15 EST ---
I should add that there are problems with the %doc section revealed by rpmlint 
which
I'm going to sort out.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml)

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network 
peer-to-peer client (ocaml)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: mldonkey -  |Review Request: mldonkey -
   |MLDonkey is a multi-platform|MLDonkey is a multi-platform
   |multi-network peer-to-peer  |multi-network peer-to-peer
   |client  |client (ocaml)




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 16:08 EST ---
Added magic word ocaml to the summary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433143] New: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143

   Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform
multi-network peer-to-peer client
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/mldonkey.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/mldonkey-2.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 
MLDonkey - the Open Source eDonkey client

Features:

* 100% OpenSource, GPL license
* runs on Linux, Unix, Solaris, MacOSX, MorphOS and Windows
* Core and Guis are separated or linked.
* written in ObjectiveCaml, with some C and even some Assembler parts.
* OtherNetworksSupported, using separate executables
* built to run as daemon for days, weeks, ever...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 14:59 EST ---
Yes, go ahead.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale 
eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967


Bug 214967 depends on bug 349801, which changed state.

Bug 349801 Summary: mock installs packages that don't satisfy BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349801

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
   Flag|needinfo?(pablo.martin- |
   |[EMAIL PROTECTED])  |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 13:48 EST ---
Well, I've tried to not rename gnome-menu-extended.desktop. Whereas the desktop
is  installed in the right path, he doesn't appear in the menu nor in Alacarte
without any reason. I've update the previous files, so you can use the links
which I've give previously. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 13:47 EST ---
There was also a autogen-manuals package according to the Spec in CVS. According
to the %changelog, which is quite old, it was created to prevent some sort of
conflict on F-7. The reason for this conflict is unclear to me. Therefore, I
dropped it.

It looks to me that the *.autogen suffix is not required because no other
package seems to provide binaries of the same name. If that is so, we can drop
the dependency on %{_sbindir}/alternatives.

What do you think?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it)

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||177841
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] New: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it)

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135

   Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control
(+GUI for it)
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn

SRPM URL: 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.5-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.6-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn

Description: 
The overall goal of this project is to provide remote control service on Linux
through Bluetooth, InfraRed, Wi-Fi or TCP/IP connection.

anyRemote supports wide range of modern cell phones like Nokia, SonyEricsson,
Motorola and others.

anyRemote was developed as thin "communication" layer between Buetooth (IR, 
Wi-Fi)-capabled phone
and Linux, and in could be configured to manage almost any software.

gAnyRemote and kAnyRemote are GTK and KDE GUI frontends for anyRemote.

This is my first package and i need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 13:25 EST ---
Back in the days of FC-5 and FC-6 Fedora's libopts (or autoopts) package was
retired: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/libopts/

Strangely the latest libopts tarball from upstream is versioned 27.6:
http://gnu.glug-nith.org/libopts/rel27.6/

At the same time, Debian ships a libopts package that bears the same EVRA as
autogen: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopts25 I took this option.
Remember due to the multiple licensing scenario we have to separate the libopts
(or autoopts) portion from the rest of autogen.

What do you suggest?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen 
when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 13:10 EST ---
Version:1.2.4.orig
Non numeric version string like alpha, beta, rc, cannot be simply putted into 
the Version tag, you should use the Release field for this.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a

W: setup-not-quiet
Setup is not quiet, you should use %setup -q.

The source tag documents where to find the upstream sources for the rpm, in 
most cases this should be a complete URL to the upstream tarball. May be this:
Source0: 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/blueproximity/blueproximity-1.2.4.tar.gz




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 12:58 EST ---
Would someone update this bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 430366] Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans 
ladspa support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430366





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 12:58 EST ---
ping again?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 12:17 EST ---
Well, first of all, the version of bundled autoopts seems
31.0.6. Is it possible to submit a seperated autoopts review request?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433129] New: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433129

   Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for
GKrellM
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This package was orphaned, and I am now taking it.

As stated in 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#head-3f36f420c1e97b0faecad2f2c5f6871433348a3a
 I must open a review.

The package is already in cvs, under gkrellm-weather.

I don't think there are any problems with the package as is.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
   Flag||needinfo?(pablo.martin-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED])




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 11:39 EST ---
Well, then would you try

desktop-file-install --vendor="" \
   --dir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications\
   applications/%{name}.desktop  

as suggested by Ariszlo (sorry on my browser I cannot see the last character
of your name), Martin?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on 
OLPC XO


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 11:32 EST ---
Well, for 0.6.6-2:

* Please don't introduce Epoch.
* Please don't use _unpackaged_files_terminate_build but explicitly
  remove files unneededly installed. Using _unpackaged_files_terminate_build
  frequently makes a package unusable when version is upgraded and some
  new files gets actually needed to be installed.
* Remove all unneeded comments to make your spec file easier to read.
* %{_libdir}/lib*.so should be in -devel subpackage
  (What I commented was about %{_libdir}/speech-dispatcher/lib*.so)
* What I meant by "dependency between subpackage must be EVR specific"
  is that for example -devel package should have
  "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}", not
  "Requires: %{name} = %{version}".
* %dir %{_libdir}/speech-dispatcher-modules is listed twice
* -doc subpackage must have Requires(post): /sbin/install-info or so
  And 
if [ $1 = 0 ]; then
/sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || :
fi
  or so must be %preun, not %postun (please check the section
  "Texinfo" of
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets )
* %configure \
 --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix} 
  - I guess you must not do this. This will sometimes override header
files, configuration files etc  and leads to some undesirable
results.

* And I am waiting for your submit of dotconf review request :)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 11:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> - When installing desktop files, desktop-file-install must be called
>   ("desktop-file-install usage" of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines )

I will review this and make the change before the next build.

Thank you for looking.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and 
filename operations


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a 
jQuery plotting library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 11:02 EST ---
Package do not build in mock, add for example this:
BuildRequires:  python-setuptools >= 0.6c5

Error output:
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py build
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 2, in 
from setuptools import setup, find_packages
ImportError: No module named setuptools
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21399 (%build)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 11:02 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Usually section 3 man files are for the explanation of functions
> and should be in -devel subpackage.

I will review this and make the change before the next build.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a 
jQuery plotting library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 10:58 EST ---
rpmlint output:
python-turboflot.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4-1 0.0.5-1.fc8

I think this package requires TurboGears and simplejson, so add:
  Requires: TurboGears >= 1.0.3, python-simplejson >= ...
or something similar.

Source package do not match upstream and source URL is not complete!

May be there is a missing "." at end of description (just summary can't end with
".").


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) 
capture devices


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 10:21 EST ---
Ralf and Parag, thanks for your efforts.

Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap-0.2.19-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 09:30 EST ---
I have submitted the path here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1894926&group_id=10706&atid=310706

Also , found an interesting pkg-config patch here:
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=6ffb82fd0802130847ncd95990wa2203f220763b13e%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=sox-devel

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 09:11 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=295071)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295071&action=view)
Patch to add modular sox built (need to be approved upstream)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 09:10 EST ---
Hi Jirka,

I was thinking about using pkgconfig with sox-devel (and Requiring the related
libs there.) For what i've seen in devel, it only uses pkg-config at library
detection.

Well, see the attached patch.(which i don't expect to use unless approved by the
upstream project). There is maybe a better way to do this (i meant to use
AM_LDFLAGS to avoid_version seems a little hacky). Also it would be good to
provide a pkg-config detection for packages that need sox-devel (Work in
progress, but it will depend on the used scheme, either with or without libltdl,
which change a lot).

As a third part packager; I would provide a sox-libs-freeworld for the libmad
and others libs. Maybe that would need to define a more accurate %file section
for {_libdir}/sox/*.so .

For the amr part , as this is nonfree but also non-redistributable, I cannot
hold any sox-libs-nonfree package and that would be cared at end-users rebuild
of the freeworld package.
for info i've made a nosrc package for amr{nv,wb}, you can see here:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433110] New: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110

   Summary: Review Request: python-tidy -  Python wrapper for tidy,
from the HTML tidy project
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy.spec
SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy-0.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
Python wrapper (bindings) for tidylib, this allows you to tidy HTML
files through a Pythonic interface.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 245488] Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245488


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 08:20 EST ---
Hello Brendon,

Apart from the Source0 line, which should be
http://www.maradns.org/download/1.3/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
instead of
http://www.maradns.org/download/1.2/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2

the package looks good. Approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and 
breeding game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 08:18 EST ---
Upstream said that license is GPLv2.

Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds-0.8-0.3.prealpha.fc8.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and 
hash functions


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433030] Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433030


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NOTABUG




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 07:32 EST ---
I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 07:07 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=295066)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295066&action=view)
License check list for crystalspace

(For non-legal issue, please see my previous comments)
Note:
Unless you specify license tag for subpackages, subpackages
inherits license tag from main package.
For example, currently -doc subpackage has
"License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and GPLv2".

Legal issue:

GPLv2:
GPLv2/apps/import/maya2spr/binarytree.cpp
  -> maya2spr (in -utils) is GPLv2
GPLv2/scripts/max/exportcsp.mcr
GPLv2/scripts/max/exportlights.mcr
GPLv2/scripts/max/exportsprite.mcr
GPLv2/scripts/max/fixmaterials.mcr
GPLv2/scripts/max/sanitycheck.ms
GPLv2/scripts/max/showMap.mcr
  -> all these files (in -utils) are GPLv2

GPLv2+:
GPLv2+/apps/tests/ceguitest/ceguitest.cpp
GPLv2+/apps/tests/ceguitest/ceguitest.h
  -> ceguitest (in -demos) is GPLv2+
GPLv2+/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/
  -> libcrystalspace-1.2.so (in main) is GPLv2+ (not LGPLv2+)
-
  1810echo './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/cstool/memory_pen.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/cstool/csfxscr.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/scrshot.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/x11-keys.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/cursorconvert.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/softfontcache.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/fontcache.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/graph2d.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/imageloader/commonimagefile.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/imageloader/optionsparser.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/particlesys/partgen.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/render3d/txtmgr.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/render3d/normalizationcube.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/parserenderstep.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/basesteptype.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/basesteploader.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/script/scriptcommon.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/shader/shaderprogram.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/convert.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/cyclicbuf.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/sndstream.o@'
'./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.o@' | sed 's/@ /@/g' |
tr '@' '
  1811  ' >> ./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so.resp
  1812  
  1813  
  1814g++ -Wl,--as-needed -shared -o
./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so
-Wl,@./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so.resp  -lm -ldl -lnsl
-Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols -Wl,-E -g3 -lpthread -lpthread -lz
-lm -ldl -lnsl -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols -Wl,-E -g3 \
  1815  -Wl,-soname,libcrystalspace-1.2.so
-
GPLv2+/plugins/sndsys/element/
  -> sndsysXXX.so (in main) is GPLv2+
GPLv2+/plugins/utilities/movierecorder/
  -> movierecorder.so (in main) is GPLv2+ (not GPLv2)
GPLv2+/scripts/jamtemplate/createproject.sh
  -> createproject.sh (in -devel) is GPLv2+

Check for GPLv2+ pollution
root:
GPLv2+/include/csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.h ->
LGPLv2+/include/csplugincommon.h:#include "csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.h" ->
LGPLv2+/include/crystalspace.h:#include "csplugincommon.h" ->
File_C_or_C++/plugins/cscript/pycscegui/cs_cegui.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
File_C_or_C++/plugins/cscript/csperl5/cswigpl5.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/converter.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/genmeshify.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/processor.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/stdloadercontext.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/startme/startme.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/lighter2/common.h:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/basemapgen/basemapgen.h:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/heightmapgen/heightmapgen.h:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/tools/partconv/partconv.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
( -
LGPLv2+/apps/walktest/walktest.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h"
LGPLv2+/apps/pysimp/pysimp.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tests/imptest/imptest.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tests/eventtest/eventtest.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tests/sndtest/sndtest.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/pathtut/pathtut.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simpcd/simpcd.h:#include 
LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simple2/simple2.h:#inclu

[Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 06:40 EST ---
Ok, let's introduce color-filesystem
Can I remove gawk just before import?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment.

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime 
environment.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 06:13 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is there a reason we're going to be shipping two versions?

>From the java-1.7.0-icedtea README:

Java compatibility
--

IcedTea is derived from OpenJDK, Sun's open-source implementation of
the Java SE platform.  At this time the build from which IcedTea was
constructed corresponds to an early build of JDK 7.  When JDK 7
is complete it will implement the Java SE 7 Platform Specification.
Work on that specification is underway, but far from final.  Any APIs
in the JDK 7 implementation, whether new or old, are therefore subject
to minor adjustments, major revisions, or even outright removal
between now and the time that the Java SE 7 Platform Specification is
finalized.  Please take these facts into account before depending upon
IcedTea.

java-1.6.0-icedtea will be the "stable" version that is as close as possible to
standard 1.6 compatibility as possible.

---

>From a compatibility point of view the 1.6.0 version should be shipped as
default. The reason IcedTea started with 1.7.0 was because that was the code
that was available. Getting it liberated completely and bootstrapping with the
free gnu java toolchain was priority one. Now that that work is stabilizing and
the new work done upstream on openjdk6, we can concentrate on this more
standards compatible version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433095] New: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433095

   Summary: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/galaxy/galaxy.spec
SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/galaxy/galaxy-13-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Galaxy is a free Linux computer program which simulates the motion 
of stars
under the influence of gravity. Create a field of random stars to begin with,
then watch the stars move as they are accelerated by their mutual
gravitational attractions. You can vary the number of stars and the strength
of gravity. Watch how the attractive forces accelerate individual stars and
send them careening in new directions. Watch how large groups of stars develop
into interesting patterns over time, such as clusters and spiral arms.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433033] Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433033





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 03:10 EST ---
- Correct install section
Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz.spec
SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz-15-2.fc8.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 03:07 EST ---
Fix typo in Owner

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: glpi-pdf
Short Description: GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers
Owners: remi
Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf -  GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 03:05 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: glpi-pdf
Short Description: GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers
Owners: remmi
Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive 
import


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 03:06 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: glpi-mass-ocs-import
Short Description: GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import
Owners: remi
Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game

2008-02-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and 
breeding game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 02:58 EST ---
Fixed
Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds-0.8-0.2.prealpha.fc8.src.rpm

If I set release "0.1.pre-alpha%{?dist}" rpmbuild warns:
error: line 3: Illegal char '-' in release: Release:0.1.pre-alpha.fc8 so
what should I do?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review