[Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 03:30 EST --- *** Bug 433863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433863] Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 03:30 EST --- Oh, no... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 428718 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 03:44 EST --- The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't get in for quite a while because of this. But here's the shopping list: * asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1) * emma (we don't have this at all yet) * jarjar (we don't have this either) * jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94) * jna (we don't have it at all) * joda-time (we don't have it at all) * joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it) * junit (we have this one! phew!) * retroweaver (we don't have this at all either) So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't get in for quite a while because of this. But here's the shopping list: * asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1) * emma (we don't have this at all yet) * jarjar (we don't have this either) * jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94) * jna (we don't have it at all) * joda-time (we don't have it at all) * joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it) * junit (we have this one! phew!) * retroweaver (we don't have this at all either) So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :). Thank you for investigating BR. This list is very useful for getting jruby into Fedora. Then would you also write: - this BR is already in Fedora - Someone has already submitted a review request for this BR - Or even no review request has been submitted for this BR if you know? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:25 EST --- kitsune-2.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:27 EST --- kitsune-2.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:27 EST --- LinLog-0.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:27 EST --- LinLog-0.3-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:27 EST --- linpsk-0.9-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:27 EST --- dxcc-20080225-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:26 EST --- dxcc-20080225-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 04:25 EST --- linpsk-0.9-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||2.0-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||227052, 227073, 252082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227052] Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||417511 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252082] Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252082 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||417511 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227073] Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227073 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||417511 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435540] New: Review Request: lpsk31 - A ncurses application for ham radio communications using PSK31 digital mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435540 Summary: Review Request: lpsk31 - A ncurses application for ham radio communications using PSK31 digital mode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/lpsk31.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/lpsk31-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: lpsk31 is a ncurses console application for ham radio communications in the popular PSK31 digital mode. lpsk31 uses only integer arithmetic for both signal detection and audio tone synthesis, so that it needs no floating point calculations for its operation. lpsk31 can keep a log of QSO's in text and ADIF format as well as a raw log of all that is typed in the transmit window or displayed in the receive window. This package mock builds for Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] New: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xfhell.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xfhell-1.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: xfhell is a GTK+ application for the fuzzy digital amateur radio communication mode known as Hellschreiber. This package mock builds for Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435542] New: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435542 Summary: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xdemorse.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xdemorse-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: xdemorse is a GTK+ graphical version of demorse, using the same decoding engine as demorse. It has an FFT-derived waterfall display of the incoming audio signal's spectrum, as well as a 'scope-like display of the audio detector's output and status of the mark/space discriminator (slicer). xdemorse also has CAT for the FT-847 and this can be used to net the receiver's frequency to the incoming signal, by clicking near its trace in the waterfall display. This package mock builds for Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] New: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gridloc-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: gridloc is a ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA locaters for ham radio operators from location co-ordinates, and vice-versa. gridloc also calculates distance and direction (long-path or short-path) from a home location to another (DX) location. This package mock builds for Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433129] Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433129 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 05:52 EST --- 2.0.7-6 looks good, approved. No need for CVS activity and builds are already done so I suppose it's fine to just close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 06:07 EST --- I tried to update this package and ran in to problems. I will try again and collect the build log if someone does not beat me to is. Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xpsk31.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xpsk31-0.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435542] Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435542 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435540] Review Request: lpsk31 - A ncurses application for ham radio communications using PSK31 digital mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsk31 - A ncurses application for ham radio communications using PSK31 digital mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435540 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435058] Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435058 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435542] Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435542 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 06:44 EST --- some notes - you should add the doc/xdemorse.html as %doc too (README and ChangeLog are referring to it) - you should ask upstream to include the license text into ythe source archive - when trying to run xdemorse, I am getting an error Failed to open xdemorserc file. Quit xdemorse and correct Formal review: OK source files match upstream: c42e15d6056ac7aa3ab8981c9e689ed43770205b xdemorse-0.9.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (F-8/x86_64, Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file included So before final approval I need from you to update the %doc with the manual and fix (or explain) the xdemorserc issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435234] Review Request: xdx - DX-cluster tcp/ip client for amateur radio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdx - DX-cluster tcp/ip client for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435234 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the
Hellschreiber communications mode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 06:47 EST ---
Source http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/hell/xfhell-1.3.tar.gz doesn't match with
the %{version} (xfhell-1.4)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435542] Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdemorse - GTK based application for decoding and displaying Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435542 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 06:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) some notes - you should add the doc/xdemorse.html as %doc too (README and ChangeLog are referring to it) - you should ask upstream to include the license text into ythe source archive - when trying to run xdemorse, I am getting an error Failed to open xdemorserc file. Quit xdemorse and correct ... So before final approval I need from you to update the %doc with the manual and fix (or explain) the xdemorserc issue. The solution could be some demo xdemorserc in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the
Hellschreiber communications mode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:01 EST ---
unable verify sources as 1.4 is not available.
Source URL should be
http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/hell/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the
calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:07 EST ---
your build command should be
make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS %{?_smp_mflags}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:08 EST --- make changes. provides new SRPM. Will review then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:16 EST --- also, missing COPYING file to %doc and remove text from spec #doesn't contain a copy of GPLv2 License, queried upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:18 EST --- koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481841 build failed for ppc and ppc64 with log= cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -march=nativecc1: error: unrecognized command line option -march=native cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -march=native -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:22 EST ---
+ rpmlint output
rpmlint is clean
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
- package should satisfy packaging guidelines
It needs to Require the exact Perl module, by adding:
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
(cf: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/perl-Dir-Which.spec)
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
md5: 037150b3131a566b518a7042f9a8d527
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
i386
+ ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
+ static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
+ packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
- packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
This is wrong:
%{perl_vendorarch}/*
Name the directories it uses more specifically, otherwise it ends up
owning the shared File directory. (That's my understanding -- the
policy is vague and contradictory in this area).
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
+ translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
? reviewer should build the package in mock
? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
? review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin
--
Just fix the two points raised above and post another spec/SRPM,
and if those are fixed there shouldn't be a problem with approval.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:40 EST --- I added two new bugs in fact, because bug 239077 was unrelated to the reason for the ExcludeArch. ppc: bug 435546 ppc64: bug 435545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 07:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) [...] it is only used to build VirtualBox and VirtualBox runs nowhere else. Just my 2 cent: I normally strongly prefer to just call a package exactly like upstream calls its software. But for this package I'm starting to wonder if it might be better to call it VirtualBox-kbuild or something, to avoid confusion with the linux-kernel-internal kbuild infra. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:16 EST --- I tend to agree with Thorsten and the name he suggested. Anyone has a different opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:25 EST --- This is yet another package that doesn't specify any version of the LGPL. How did you determine that it's not LGPLv2+? I thought that linking with ocaml libraries might force the issue, but the base ocaml package in rawhide doesn't even have a valid license tag so that's no help. Disclaimer: I'm upstream maintainer of this package too. The license is the famous LGPLv2+ with exceptions. I've made a new upstream package which adds proper license information to the head of each file. (http://merjis.com/developers/perl4caml/) Does this package handle the perl modules it wraps not being installed at builr or runtime? It still seems to build the Net::Google stuff, for example, even though that package isn't required at all. And that begs the question of whether those perl packages are actually needed at runtime. The package builds without them and I didn't see any differences in the resulting package. No it doesn't need the Perl package at build time. At run time also it will work unless of course you actually try to use the specific wrapped module, in which case you'll get a runtime error from Perl when it tries to 'use Net::Google' (or whichever). The basic runtime functionality requires only libperl.so, for which there is an automatically added requires. Here's a new package: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml-0.9.5-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Mar 1 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.9.5-1 - New upstream release 0.9.5. - Clarify license is LGPLv2+ with exceptions - Remove excessive BuildRequires - Perl modules not needed for building. - Pass RPM C flags to the make. - 'make test' fails where perl4caml is already installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:28 EST --- F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481892 devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:38 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-camlp5 Short Description: Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:43 EST --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:49 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481863 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 473b2dea5684dc681c0e3e7ecb083cee ocaml-sqlite3-0.23.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package ocaml-sqlite-0.23.0-2.fc9 = Provides: dllsqlite3_stubs.so ocaml(Sqlite3) = c3f364a0311d687e52a8adbeed19f8e5 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libsqlite3.so.0 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 + Package ocaml-sqlite-devel-0.23.0-2.fc9 = Requires: ocaml-sqlite = 0.23.0-2.fc9 + Followed ocaml packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:58 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481958 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080224-2.fc9 = Provides: dllmlcairo.so dllmlcairo_lablgtk.so ocaml(Cairo) = 1120d1d2aa838fb82c89723e40027d3e ocaml(Cairo_bigarray) = f5278f29e0f267216517b39938447e1f ocaml(Cairo_ft) = c7b86ae255e7715a56b6730cd62fb0a5 ocaml(Cairo_lablgtk) = 82e26006bc0f771f240d32cee4e40a99 ocaml(Cairo_pdf) = 4e73fe9bce1bcaa3d496352353001779 ocaml(Cairo_png) = 2a83dcbeee368b33e7553e447746d3a7 ocaml(Cairo_ps) = af8d18227472072b7a4cabd1ad743a0d ocaml(Cairo_svg) = e90fc8093ba12fa82a62907377ca4223 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libfreetype.so.6 ocaml(Bigarray) = e881a834bafaaa24bc612d94119cc0f5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(Complex) = bb333e8e4cda78107ccf27048ca40492 ocaml(Gaux) = 1f8c3af1ec44d0b19146161a687dd947 ocaml(Gdk) = 4cac9e9df9320b71cd77db9bff9f1b91 ocaml(GdkPixbuf) = a5ff570e45ecdc9c9213f393f8d57f2b ocaml(Glib) = 39c579079161658673ebd1ea3a5d3ab9 ocaml(Gobject) = c0ecf32dba4d98abfabf69278beb91f5 ocaml(Gpointer) = 72eda5d9f0d59b5972aa22fcecf67daa ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pango) = b5403be8d9b1c0fb2807ac3675dd0323 ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 + Package ocaml-cairo-devel-1.2.0.cvs20080224-2.fc9 = Requires: ocaml-cairo = 1.2.0.cvs20080224-2.fc9 + Followed ocaml packaging guidelines. how can I verify source? Add instructions on how to checkout source code in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|433199 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|432542 |228351 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 08:59 EST --- There is a multi-lib conflicts bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:01 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-sqlite Short Description: OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:06 EST --- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta-2.2.3-4.fc8.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=481998 Other methods of removing rpaths are leading to build failures. Reverting to chrpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435433] Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) 3) make install should be called as make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL=install -p I found nothing like this in the guidelines. I might have overlooked it of course. Could you point me at the reasoning for this please? Yes. thats not mentioned in packaging guidelines but use of INSTALL=install -p ensures that timestamps will be kept same as upstream released of installed files. You can relate this to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab Also, build failed with error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:21 EST --- Unfortunately upstream don't make tarballs available. As you suggested I've added instructions to the spec file about how to check out and tar up the source. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080301-1.fc8.src.rpm * Sat Mar 1 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.2.0.cvs20080301-1 - Upgrade to latest CVS. - Include instructions on how check out versions from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:22 EST --- Make sure you hit [Shift] [Reload] on that spec file. My web server seems to be sending some long expires headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:24 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: liblqr-1 Short Description: LiquidRescale library Owners: ics Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:24 EST --- May I know please reason for packaging .cmo file? From guildeines = *.cmo files are not normally included. There is however one exception -- if file is needed for link (like gtkInit.cmo in lablgtk or std_exit.cmo in OCaml itself), then it should be included. Is this needed by any other package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) In theory, kBuild can be used to build anything and not only virtualbox, therefore I do not like the name very much. Also debian use only kBuild as a name for this package. In case there is a strong need to rename it, I would prefer something like kBuild-makefile-framework, which describes it better. That also makes sense. I'm do not dare how many users would confuse kBuild with kernel's build system, but I certainly wouldn't. In fact I can't imagine a scenario where that could occur. Btw. one issue with the current kBuild spec is, that RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used to compile it. But I do not currently know how to change this. Thanks for telling that, I'm glad I avoided scop noticing that :)) I'll take care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:34 EST --- This is (another) thing I need to change about the packaging guidelines. In this case pa_openin.cmo is the actual program we're distributing. It's an OCaml bytecode object file which is loaded into the OCaml parser at runtime and changes the syntax of the parser. So the packaging guidelines should mention this. I'm going to prepare new draft guidelines to cover this and other issues but I haven't got around to it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:38 EST --- one way to silent ocaml-openin.i386: E: no-binary is to use in SPEC BuildArch: noarch Holding review till new guildelines will get approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:36 EST --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482063 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:40 EST --- Link was wrong, it should be: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080301-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:42 EST --- Well, one of the reason I dislike to use rpath commands is that rpath removes all rpaths, which sometimes renders an application unusable (ex. bug 432468) For this package, from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482072 -- ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/anjuta/libanjuta-class-gen.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64/anjuta:/usr/lib64] -- Note that the rpath /usr/lib64/anjuta is _valid_ and I guess this rpath should not be removed. In short, we should remove just invalid rpath and leave needed rpath as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 09:45 EST --- Here's one that should work. It passes the mock test for me and I think I caught all of Bill's requested changes. http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsoup22-2.2.105-1.fc9.src.rpm http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/libsoup22.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 10:46 EST --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-wheel.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-wheel-1.0.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Mar 1 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.0.4-2 - Missing BR ocaml-pcre-devel. - Missing BR pcre-devel. I've built it in mock this time, so I'm fairly confident it should build for you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:02 EST --- I looked at the other perl-File-* specs and chose what I thought was the best format for the files section and I added the perl Requires. Thanks for the feedback. Spec: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic.spec SRPM: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:11 EST --- Everything fixed, confirmed it builds in mock. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:22 EST --- New Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482220 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:23 EST ---
Packaging guildelines said
*.cmo files are not normally included. There is however one exception -- if file
is needed for link (like gtkInit.cmo in lablgtk or std_exit.cmo in OCaml
itself), then it should be included.
*.o files are not normally included. There is however one exception -- if file
is needed for link (like gtkInit.cmx and gtkInit.o in lablgtk or std_exit.cmx
and std_exit.o in OCaml itself), then it should be included.
Is *.o belongs to main package or -devel if allowed because I see description
written for *.o under -devel sub-package in ocaml guidelines.
Also, I didn't get following
# Stop it from trying to install jsoncat into /usr/bin ...
mv jsoncat jsoncat.ignore
make install
# ... and then install jsoncat by hand.
mv jsoncat.ignore jsoncat
install -m 0755 jsoncat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:27 EST --- and sorry for mistakenly writing following from my review template + no -devel subpackage exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 11:36 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-cairo Short Description: OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434704] Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434704 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 12:11 EST --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482326 log said = configure: error: Cannot find camlp4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 12:17 EST --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482333 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/type-conv-1.3.0/lib' ocamlc -c -I +camlp4 pa_type_conv.mli File pa_type_conv.mli, line 34, characters 0-23: Unbound module Camlp4.PreCast.Ast make[1]: *** [pa_type_conv.cmi] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 12:57 EST --- Okay, Build of ocaml-pxp-1.2.0test1-5.fc9.src.rpm successed. - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=482389 The rpmlint output can be ignored regarding to the OCaml Packaging Guideline. * APPROVED * -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/oyranos.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/oyranos-0.1.7-9.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) changelog - Comment out the oyranos default policy until some profiles are available within the repository. - Add Requirement needed by oyranos_moni.pc - Add README-Fedora-ICC_PROFILES - Uses color-filesystem BR and macros - Split the doc - Fix wrong file encoding not-utf8 ChangeLog - Tweak oyranos_version.h - Repackage the sources. In my view, the icc profiles need to be noarch (without a dist tag). With one packages for one different archive (and upstream), So i'm still working to have them packaged, then required at runtime with a virtual provides (color-icc-profiles). I still have the oyranos-docs.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/oyranos-docs-0.1.7/structoyComp__scoll__graph.map What seems safer ? do delete it and try to have a file not found error, or can i leave it for now ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:05 EST --- just approved lastest require of ocaml-cduce. Will finalize this one once you will import and build ocaml-pxp as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:31 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:34 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:36 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:38 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435042] Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435042 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:40 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:40 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-pxp Short Description: Validating XML parser Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435564] New: Review Request: lure - Lure of the Temptress - Adventure Game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435564 Summary: Review Request: lure - Lure of the Temptress - Adventure Game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lure.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lure-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Lure of the Temptress was Revolution's very first adventure game and work began on it in 1989, even before Revolution's inception as an actual games development company. From the start our aim was to consider the contemporary adventures of the day and then bring something new to the genre. From this came the Virtual Theatre engine. VT allowed in-game characters to wander around the gameworld indepently of each other, living their own lives and doing their own thing. Another feature allowed the player to give direct orders to Helper characters - in this case Ratpouch - who would then go off to perform the task. The result is a quirky and entertaining adventure game that kicked off Revolution's fondness for characterisation and in-game humour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:50 EST --- Do NOT package when tired... sorry about that. Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xfhell.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xfhell-1.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434704] Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434704 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:54 EST --- Ick, missing camlp4 again. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocamldsort.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocamldsort-0.14.4-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Mar 1 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.14.4-2 - Add missing BR ocaml-camlp4-devel and test in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:56 EST --- Ick, another missing camlp4... Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-type-conv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-type-conv-1.3.0-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Mar 1 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.3.0-2 - Add missing BR for ocaml-camlp4-devel and test build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 13:57 EST --- Hmm, When I suggested in Bug 227121 to mark it as a duplicate of this and to reopen this, and that I then would review this, I was kind of hoping that I would only be reviewing it, as I'm not mighty familiar with java. The only reason I'm interested in wstx, is because it beats the stax implementation shipped by default with icedtea by a factor of 10 when it comes to speed, making the loading of freecol (a game written in java I maintain) about 10 times faster. So perhaps a co-maintainership is the best solution, I can take either role (submitter or reviewer) now, and then later we maintain this together? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 275491] Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:04 EST --- While you're fixing the missing camlp4 dependencies, you might want to do this package as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:04 EST --- CC=gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS was suggested by David Woodhouse on another package from this same upstream so that package would build on PPC devel. I have changed the spec and built a new srpm. If you notice in the tarball upstream has a symlink for COPYING to /usr/share/automake-1.10/COPYING IMO this needs to be corrected by the upstream. Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gridloc-0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248427] Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-PAM - Authen::PAM Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248427 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248425] Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Sync - Perl access to fsync() and sync() function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248425 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:18 EST --- It looks like Bruno neglected to check the I am providing the requested information box, and so this is improperly set as NEEDINFO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:17 EST --- It's been many months since there's been any response from the submitter and it's been set to needinfo for over four months, so I'm going to close this. Richard, if you happen to want to submit this package, I'm sure it will see a quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:22 EST --- Tim, any response? This has been set to NEEDINFO for several weeks now; it will be closed soon if there's no update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 14:21 EST --- Any update? This has been set to needinfo for nearly six weeks, but I know Devrim is around frequently so I'll keep this open. I will close it soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
