[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 04:13 EST --- RHEL5.2 will have 2.3.0 in it, but it will not have the fixes for unopkg that are spoken about here as I packaged the RHEL OOo some months before I started playing around with getting extensions packagable. I don't think it's neccessary to wait for the formal adoption, we already have two prior extensions packaged, it would seem unfair to treat this one differently. Especially as the draft (modified with feedback over that time, I'm not complaining, it's a good thing) has been a draft for more that a month I think so it could be a long wait until adoption. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control
system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 05:16 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> - I would have thought that too, but I'm following the example of mailman
> mm_cfg.py, which is just the same sort of case.
The mailman package doing it this way doesn't mean it's correct or even useful
here.
With the current setup, ViewMTN doesn't care at all about a config file
in /etc, so why should the symlink be there at all? Solely as a hint, where to
look for the real config file? I don't think so.
So, inverting the symlink direction is in fact not enough, but additionally,
your sniplet added at the end of config.py, should import the file from /etc
and not from %{python_sitelib}/viewmtn.
Again, I consider it a packaging bug if a file under /usr has to be edited in
order to configure the package, at least I understand the FHS this way.
Additionally, because %{python_sitelib}/viewmtn/user_config.py is not
marked %config, changes made there are easily overwritten during a package
update.
> - monotone's poor support for db file sharing makes it extremely hairy to
> make anything work out of the box. The sample configuration in the
> viewmtn rpm works for ssh-based db serving as deployed on fedorahosted.org
> now. I want to get viewmtn packaged and running before we try to solve
> every problem.
It didn't affect usage on fedorahosted.org, if, in addition
to /srv/mtn/*/db.mtn, /var/lib/monotone/server.mtn, would be considered for
the list of dbs to be served, does it? Thought ViewMTN tried to work around
the sharing problems (in a limited fashion) by restarting the mtn process in
case of any problem. Otoh, this is not a blocker issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 05:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #28) > > - As written on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > > a NEEDSPONSOR submitter are requested to either pre-review other > > persons' review requests or submit another review request with > > quality. > > For your case, you have already submitted some other review requests > > and I expect they will be accepted with some more fixes. > Sorry, i'm not sure what i'm understand this correctly ... > Should i do review/approval for 433219 and 433220 by myself ? No, like this they must be reviewed and accepted by someone else. The difference is that once you are sponsored, they can be reviewed by non-sponsor members (but still you cannot review your own review requests) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 05:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) > - As written on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > a NEEDSPONSOR submitter are requested to either pre-review other > persons' review requests or submit another review request with > quality. > For your case, you have already submitted some other review requests > and I expect they will be accepted with some more fixes. Sorry, i'm not sure what i'm understand this correctly ... Should i do review/approval for 433219 and 433220 by myself ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 07:00 EST --- "For me you (fuse-s3fs) already have the green light. I am not a mentor or sponsor or something like that. I am not confident with the" Please stop commenting on this bug then. While you're comments are appreciated , this bug is open specifically to request a package review for inclusion in Fedora. By actively holding a conversation on it, you may well be keeping actual reviewers from taking the time to look at it, and that will prevent the package from ever getting reviewed, and subsequently accepted. Once this package is in, I'll happily talk to you about enhancements. Until then, please let the reviewers do their job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 07:12 EST --- Setting fedora-review flag to (none). This flag must be set by the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 09:41 EST --- This should NOT have passed review for one simple reason. It installs binaries (itext.jar) directly from the source zip file. This sort of thing is forbidden in Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?#head-c23c2cd3782be842dc7ab40c35199c07cfbfe347 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437481] New: Review Request: ocaml-newt - OCaml library for using newt text mode window system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437481 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-newt - OCaml library for using newt text mode window system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-newt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-newt-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for using newt text mode window system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 10:28 EST --- The documentation says that if you want to support PDF security you need to install either itext.jar or PDFTK and indeed a pre-built itext.jar is provided in the extendedPDF upstream .zip, but it's not installed by this .spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437481] Review Request: ocaml-newt - OCaml library for using newt text mode window system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-newt - OCaml library for using newt text mode window system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437481 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 10:25 EST --- rpmlint --> no output Requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libnewt.so.0.52 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Gc) = 3c11fc69ccb4eb611e4cf313a52c3a2d ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 Provides: ocaml(Newt) = d14c49fe424fca27c0f056396401b7bd ocaml(Newt_int) = fe698fd61390bcf7fae3e161930c562e ocaml-newt = 0.6-1.fc9 List of files in base package: /usr/lib/ocaml/newt /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/META /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/mlnewt.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt_int.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlnewt.so /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlnewt.so.owner /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-0.6 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-0.6/COPYING.LIB List of files in -devel subpackage: /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/libmlnewt.a /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/mlnewt.a /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/mlnewt.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt_int.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/newt/newt_int.mli /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/01_open.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/02_simple.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/03_window.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/04_form.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/05_listbox.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/06_gc.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/07_checkbox.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/10_message.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/11_chooser.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/12_enable.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/COPYING.LIB /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/README /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/Newt.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/Newt_int.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_attributes.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_class_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_classes.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_exceptions.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_methods.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_module_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_modules.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/index_values.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/style.css /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/type_Newt.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-newt-devel-0.6/html/type_Newt_int.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 10:43 EST --- >Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has sponsored you for >membership in the cvsextras Despite of this my status in cvsextras still Unapproved (i'm waiting for several hours already) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437483] New: Too many packages to upload!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437483 Summary: Too many packages to upload! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] For sure, I have the wrong category for this, but my complaint is that perhaps the distribution flow needs some re-thinking. It seems just plain wrong, that I download a 3.5 Gbyte dvd image, which takes several hours, and then, when I install it, I have to spend another day getting more up-to-date versions of stuff on that image. Yesterday, after installing a new 9-Alpha download, the package updater tells me there are 701 packages to update! Well, I propose that the images be updated weekly or monthly to help reduce the download traffic. I mean, a hundred packages might be acceptable, but 700 or 1500? That's ridiculous! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437491] New: Request for package : PgWorksheet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437491 Summary: Request for package : PgWorksheet Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All URL: http://pgworksheet.projects.postgresql.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] PgWorksheet is a simple GUI frontend to PostgreSQL for executing SQL queries and psql commands without using the psql command line tool : http://pgworksheet.projects.postgresql.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437483] Too many packages to upload!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Too many packages to upload! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437483 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 11:26 EST --- It may be ridiculous, but it's not a bug. Packagers rebuild stuff all the time. Much of it is bug fixes. Some of it isn't, but changing everyone's habits is nearly impossible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437483] Too many packages to upload!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Too many packages to upload! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437483 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |distribution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437483] Too many packages to upload!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Too many packages to upload! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437483 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 11:54 EST --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/openoffice.org-extendedPDF.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/openoffice.org-extendedPDF-1.4-3.fc8.src.rpm * Fri Mar 14 2008 Orion Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.4-3 - Remove itext.jar from source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437483] Too many packages to upload!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Too many packages to upload! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437483 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 11:31 EST --- You should also look into the Fedora Unity project: http://fedoraunity.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:10 EST --- I requested cvs and got sidetracked, then forgot, I will build and close today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:12 EST --- as you know from my other bug (435541) with you I have been a bit disconnected, I am working on this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:23 EST --- of course "The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec" doesn't really hold now. I still don't think there was a problem with the -2 version, the jar wasn't installed and the jar is itext.jar which is a distributable MPL/LGPL java library available from http://www.lowagie.com/iText/download.html. The same situation arises in apache-ant where the third party "./lib/xercesImpl.jar" and "./lib/xml-apis.jar" are included in the source distribution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:40 EST --- I am retrying several times, however I meet with Internal error. If FAS2 still breaks even after I wait for one day more, I will mail to FAS2 sysadmin _again_. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:40 EST --- But itext isn't in Fedora because of Bug 236309: itext contains Sun confidential code. The files mentioned in that bug are in the itext.jar in compiled form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:44 EST --- It seems that junit is needed for BuildRequires? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=516868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:49 EST --- Orion, the only stuff that *really* needs to be stripped from sources are things that aren't (re)distributable (like patent-encumbered bits), which doesn't apply in this case. afaict, ymmv, and all that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:45 EST --- INFO: Now (at least on rawhide) java-1.7.0-icedtea is replaced by java-1.6.0-openjdk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:51 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?(timothy.selivanow@ ||virtualxistenz.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 12:50 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 13:28 EST --- xfhell-1.4-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 13:29 EST --- xfhell-1.4-4.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Alias: cel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 13:53 EST --- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 13:58 EST --- or ping folks on freenode, #fedora-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435541] Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfhell - GTK based Ham Radio application for the Hellschreiber communications mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435541 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 13:33 EST --- Thank you for the review and reminder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 14:21 EST --- I'm not asserting opinions, nor am I any python expert. I'm just trying to follow Fedora packaging guidelines. With the sense of the symlink inverted, I cannot get the package to build because of unpackaged /etc/*.py[oc] files. (Please try it yourself with koji build --scratch.) As I understand it, the role of the reviewer is to enforce Fedora packaging policies, not to pick them. Please refer to python packaging guidelines that say exactly what I should do, and have those guidelines changed if you disagree with them. I could not find anything clear about a case like this, so the existing Fedora example, and the facts about what works at all, are the guide. The database sharing really is not a simple problem, I told you the truth. If any obvious suggestion were actually viable, I would already be doing it. Please do not hold this review hostage to that can of worms. If you have improvements to suggest, feel free to send concrete .spec patches that you have tested yourself. If the improvements you advocate are not mandated by Fedora packaging policies, then please save them for proper bug reports once the package exists in Fedora, and do not conflate opinions and desires for the package's details with a Fedora packaging policy conformance review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 14:27 EST --- I have added the conditional in front of the Build dep using your first suggestion. I have tested the build on koji and ppc/ppc64 succeeded. Here are the new files: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/lsvpd.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/lsvpd-1.6.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(timothy.selivanow@| |virtualxistenz.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 14:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > ping? This is just waiting on me resolving my NEEDSPONSOR status/reviewing other people's packages, correct? I'm not aware of any other outstanding issues with this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:02 EST --- > (In reply to comment #23) > Please stop commenting on this bug then. OK. But you add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 in https://fedorahosted.org/s3fs/ . Note : > Opened by Neil Horman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-02-27 12:40 EST > Comment #1 From Kevin Fenzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])on 2008-03-09 22:54 EST > Comment #2 From Neil Horman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])on 2008-03-10 09:09 > EST > Comment #3 From Féliciano Matias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-03-10 21:03 EST There was no real review during 2 weeks. > Assigned to : Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) No "official" reviewer. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess > A Reviewer is defined as the person who chooses to review a package. For the sake of clarity, one person takes ownership of the review. __Other people are encouraged to comment on the review as well, either in the bug or on the mailing list__. > Once this package is in, I'll happily talk to you about enhancements. I do not request any enhancements or bug fix. Just clarification. A good documentation help reviewing a package. The /tmp issue was just playing well with other packages. > Until then, please let the reviewers do their job. If you don't want me as (unofficial or official) reviewer, no problem. I don't want to be the annoying man. But please do not tell I am abusing the reviewing process or holding the conversation or something like. Best regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control
system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:17 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm just trying to follow Fedora packaging guidelines.
Which clearly say, that FHS is to follow:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d375c524ab2ea0188557e
and any deviation from that should be rationalized in the review process.
That's all I'm trying to do.
> With the sense of the symlink inverted, I cannot get the package to build
> because of unpackaged /etc/*.py[oc] files.
You have a point here. We probably should bug upstream (later, that is), to
find a cleaner solution for configuring ViewMTN. I will ask Grahame.
But you didn't answer my two questions:
- What is the purpose of the symlink in /etc?
- How do you prevent the config file %{python_sitelib}/viewmtn/user_config.py
from being overwritten during an update?
> The database sharing really is not a simple problem, I told you the truth.
Already said that I'm not insisting on that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:23 EST --- By the way, this section is also very clear about config files: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-72ae42b20a4c2896c9e7e295b94cfc26bf580bef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:46 EST --- /etc is where people look for configuration files. I'm still following the example of mailman here. I added %config(noreplace), which I had overlooked before. Please give concrete changes you want made, not a quiz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435835] Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message and XML handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPC-XML - Set of classes for core data, message
and XML handling
Alias: perl-RPC-XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435835
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alias||perl-RPC-XML
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 15:42 EST ---
A couple thoughts prior to a full-fledged review:
The %perl_vendorarch and %perl_vendorlib macros have been defined by the
system since... oh, about RHEL3 or so. They should probably be dropped
unless you're explicitly keeping them in there to better deal with old
systems; in that case they should be conditionalized, however.
Using macros a la %{__rm} is legit, and you use them cleanly and consistently,
but they're still a bit odd in Fedora. I wouldn't consider it a blocker,
however. :)
Your buildroot is slightly wonky; Fedora generally uses
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
You have the man pages marked %doc... AFAIK convention is to not mark these as
such, though I'm not entirely sure convention is correct in this case.
The Apache::RPC::Server/::Status modules pull in mod_perl, which in turn has a
slew of requirements of its own (not the least of which is apache). I'd break
them out into a subpackage to avoid a rather large potentially unwanted
dependency tree.
Your buildrequires are incomplete: judging by Makefile.PL there are a couple
more you're going to want to throw in there. Note also that it's key to start
including core modules such as Test::More if so required.
It's often helpful to kick off a koji scratch build and post the link to the
task results in the bug review (a relatively recent development). It's also a
good self-sanity check to ensure the package builds as intended.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437559] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||437560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437560] New: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437560 Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] m,[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #433679 +++ Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon-0.13.0-1.src.rpm Description: clustermon builds three packages: modclusterd, cluster-cim, and cluster-snmp. clustermon provides cluster information (membership, quorum, services, etc) to the ricci agent, and via snmp, remote systems. More information about the conga project is available at http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/conga -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437559] New: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437559 Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] m,[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #433678 +++ Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/ricci.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/ricci-0.13.0-1.src.rpm Description: ricci is the agent that runs on locally on systems managed by conga. Conga is in RHEL4 and RHEL5, and more information about the project is at http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437574] New: Review Request: ruby-pg - A Ruby interface for the PostgreSQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437574 Summary: Review Request: ruby-pg - A Ruby interface for the PostgreSQL database engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ruby-pg/ruby-pg.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/ruby-pg/ruby-pg-0.7.9.2008.02.05-1.f8.src.rpm Description: ruby-pg is a Ruby interface to the PostgreSQL Relational Database Management System. ruby-pg is a fork of the unmaintained ruby-postgres project. ruby-pg is API-compatible (a drop-in replacement) with ruby-postgres. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437321] Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437321 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 19:43 EST --- rpmlint says: libarchive.i386: W: no-documentation and it is right, COPYING, README and NEWS should go into %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 20:12 EST --- Have a look at the smolt package, this also has a python config file in /etc, but in a subdir. Here's how I think it could look like for viewmtn: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/viewmtn.spec http://thm.fedorapeople.org/viewmtn-0.10-2.fc8.src.rpm Builds fine in koji, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=517435. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437321] Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437321 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 21:10 EST --- rpmlint: has been run, see above package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: met license: ok license field: ok license file: must be included, see above spec file language: ok spec file clarity: very clear source: ok builds: yes excludearch: n/a buildrequires: ok locale handling: n/a shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %file: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok, but missing some files, see above headers: ok static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: n/a shared libs: ok devel package: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf-8 filenames: ok Summary: include the missing %doc files, and the package is ready to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435842] Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 21:27 EST --- I've updated the package following your example. Thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437397] Review Request: pmtools - power management debugging tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pmtools - power management debugging tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437397
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 23:12 EST ---
1.) Source0:%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Please replace with full URL
2.) Release:1
Include the %{dist} tag
3.) Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root
Please use the standard BuildRoot:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473
4.) ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 ia64
Consider using %{ix86} macro instead of i386
5.) %setup -q
..
%build
cd %{name}-%{version}
...
%install
...
cd %{name}-%{version}
Those cds are not nice. Take a look at %setup -n
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html
6.) Replace /usr/sbin with %{_sbindir}
install acpidump/acpidump %{buildroot}/usr/sbin/acpidump
install acpixtract/acpixtract %{buildroot}/usr/sbin/acpixtract
install madt/madt %{buildroot}/usr/sbin/madt
...
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
/usr/sbin/acpidump
/usr/sbin/acpixtract
/usr/sbin/madt
%doc README COPYING
7.) * Thu Mar 13 2008 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Include - version-release at the end (sans dist-tag)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437397] Review Request: pmtools - power management debugging tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pmtools - power management debugging tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437397
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 23:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 5.) %setup -q
> ..
> %build
> cd %{name}-%{version}
> ...
> %install
> ...
> cd %{name}-%{version}
>
> Those cds are not nice. Take a look at %setup -n
> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html
Actually this is completely not needed. RPM cds there without explicit =n and
your cds break it.
8.) Either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, but do not mix those
9.) You don't pass %{mflags} to make; if parallel make breaks the build at least
add a comment about that
Review will continue once the package is buildable.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437400] Review Request: msr-tools - tools to read/write processor model specific registers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msr-tools - tools to read/write processor model specific registers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 23:24 EST --- meh; this seem to suffer from the very same problems as bug #437397 So I'll take also this one for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 23:52 EST --- Whoops, appears the spec for 1.0.1-2 was not actually uploaded. Fixing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 23:58 EST --- A, I'm giving you the wrong URLs. Doh! Actual URLs for 1.0.1-2: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/joni.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/joni-1.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 00:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > Perhaps now I am sponsoring you. > Please follow "wiki" page again. What I meant is that please follow "Join" wiki page again. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 00:41 EST --- Now it seems okay. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 00:43 EST --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 433135) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 00:43 EST --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 433135) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 01:09 EST --- Could you please post the link to your scratch build ? I've tried several times, 8 hours apart , to do a ppc scratch build but koji doesn't place nice with me, I keep getting errors similar to 517534 buildArch (lsvpd-1.6.2-3.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 01:25 EST --- I just tried koji scratch build for 1.6.2-3 and it was successful. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=517551 (In reply to comment #24) > Could you please post the link to your scratch build ? I've tried several > times, > 8 hours apart , to do a ppc scratch build but koji doesn't place nice with > me, I > keep getting errors similar to "dist-rawhide" is not a valid target for koji build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 02:17 EST --- Yes, but the way their build process is set up it tries to fetch junit from the web instead of using the system junit -- or something. I'm not completely sure how to fix this yet, but I'm working on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
