[Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 02:58 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: lua-posix
Short Description: A POSIX library for Lua
Owners: timn
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 02:59 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: lua-socket
Short Description: Network support for the Lua language
Owners: timn
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:01 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: lua-sql
Short Description: Database connectivity for Lua
Owners: timn
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:01 EST ---
You are right about the README file. I'll move it to the -doc package and make
lua-sql a pure meta package to pull in everything.

Thanks for all the thorough reviews!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby 
interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:35 EST ---
I think GCJ won't build it on any platform because it fails at looking for 
classes in classpath. 
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=556250)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
   Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])|




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:46 EST ---
Sorry for late responce. I was on vacation. 
I'm going to re-read updated fedora wiki docs and try again.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:51 EST ---
Is anyone interested in making code review ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 03:50 EST ---
Is anyone interested in making code review ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 04:02 EST ---
I've done "fedora-cvs anyremote"

Then as it written at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Anatomy

--
make sources
make: *** No rule to make target `sources'.  Stop.
--

Umm... Do i need at all to have sources in package directory ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyfits  - Python interface to FITS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 04:06 EST ---
Thanks, Jason. Upstream says that they are going to fix one of the tests, but
anyway, you need pyfits installed to run them.


New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: pyfits
Short Description:  Python interface to FITS
Owners: sergiopr
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 04:07 EST ---
Oops, sorry. I have to descend to devel/ before run make sources

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby 
interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 04:32 EST ---
If we ExcludeArch ppc{,64} it builds fine:
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=556292

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|433497  |
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language
Alias: tzdata-java-epel

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 06:08 EST ---
Jason: Thanks, fixed.
Imported and built, Thanks Marek, Thanks Kevin.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels
Alias: swing-layout-review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 05:00 EST ---
Kevin: sure. done; thank you for CVS.
Marek, much thanks for review!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem 
implementation
Alias: fusecompress-review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels
Alias: swing-layout-review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn|435598  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser
Alias: opengrok-review

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312


Bug 433312 depends on bug 433497, which changed state.

Bug 433497 Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing 
panels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 07:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Suggestion: Renaming default_lnk.patch to
> %{name}-%{version-when-patch-was-introduced}-default_lnk.patch will make your
> life easier. ;)

Semi-fixed.
(I rather not put the version number in the patch - as it doesn't effect the
actual code.

Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk.spec
SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk-0.7.5-6.fc8.src.rpm
 
> Final question: Why do you remove folder_home.xpm?

It was required by the old (xdialog) example.
As the example no longer needs it - there's no need to carry it around.
 
> Anyway, this package finally is APPROVED.

Thanks again for taking the time to the review.

- Gilboa

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 06:32 EST ---
Please also rebuild this on F-8. After that, visit
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request to push your F-8 packages
to the repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 08:55 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: idesk
Short Description: Light desktop manager for minimal WMs
Owners: gilboa
Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby 
interpreter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 08:57 EST ---
I think the %check should be as easy as:

%check
ant test-all

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 09:38 EST ---
The current example is indeed better than the default one, but I would
nevertheless suggest shipping folder_home.xpm be it as %doc.
I would also suggest shipping the upstream examples/default.lnk in %doc.

I also suggest substituting %{_datadir} to have things right even if
%{_datadir} is different from /usr/share/, right after patching:
sed -e -i 's:/usr/share/idesk/:%{_datadir}/idesk/:' examples/default.lnk 

And last, I think that it would be nice to have a comment stating where the
xterm.png icon comes from.

(None of these are blockers).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mpich2 -  An implementation of MPI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 10:04 EST ---
No, you can't use "Distributable" in the License tag.

"Fedora no longer permits packages to use "Distributable" as a valid License."

I'm looking into this issue in more depth now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of 
git


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 10:27 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: guilt
Short Description: Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git
Owners: sandeen
Branches: F-8 EL-5
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 10:53 EST ---
(In reply to comment #55)

Umm... Something going wrong here
---
cd anyremote/F-8
make tag
rpmq: no arguments given for query
rpmq: no arguments given for query
---

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mpich2 -  An implementation of MPI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO|182235  |
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 11:04 EST ---
This license is functionally equivalent to MIT. The Licensing page has been
updated to list the mpich2 license as "MIT". Please use:

License: MIT

Lifting FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 11:03 EST ---
First upload tarball and spec file as same as devel/ directory.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 427530] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome 
tiling window manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||NOTABUG




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 12:18 EST ---
awesome 2.2 and 2.3 have been released, but I have not made any packages of 
those.

(At least for the time being,) I have given up using awesome in favour of
standard Gnome with awesome-like keybindings: There seems to be no other way to
use NetworkManager, the setroubleshoot browser, etc.

If anyone wants to take over this package, feel free to do so.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with 
konqueror


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 12:23 EST ---
fwiw, I've played with this looking for breakage, for only a few minutes here
and there.  found no show-stoppers, nothing remotely thorough mind you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with 
konqueror


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 12:26 EST ---
wolfy, if you consider getting yourself working rawhide (to test) to review this
a blocker, please remove yourself as reviewer, else, please continue. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 12:49 EST ---
FYI: #441359 blocking testing in rawhide is now fixed.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on 
OLPC XO


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 12:51 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Does not build at least on i386 and x86_64 (dist-f9)
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554609
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554614
> 
> I have not checked your srpm at all, however:
> - Why do you disable some configure optional dependency by default?
> 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on 
OLPC XO


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:07 EST ---
Hi,

I looked through the BUILD logs and it seems the build broke down because
dotconf libraries were not found.

*** Required DotConf library missing! See INSTALL .
error: 

I believe the dotconf package is intended for OLPC-2, and hence an error for
i386 and x86_64.

ummm, I am not quite sure which optional dependencies you are referring to?
ibmtts, flite-devel and so on?

I included the conditional build options for greater flexibility, and if you
will advise me, I will remove them.

Thanks!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of 
the NX Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:09 EST ---
Thanks for the super-fast review!!!

> freenx-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/freenx
> 
> perhaps re-name the logrotate file to 'freenx-server' ?

Yes, I missed that one! I'll fix it before importing.

> Why have Release already at 6? This is a version bump from the old one,
> so I would think it should be able to start again at 1?

I'd like to keep it that way especially because it is the forked revision, so I
can see the continuity of the package. But maybe this is overkill for the client
package (the other review).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of 
the NX Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of 
the NX Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:18 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: freenx-server
Short Description: Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server
Owners: athimm
Branches: F-7 F-8
InitialCC: Jon Ciesla (limb)
Cvsextras Commits: no (too many people)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on 
OLPC XO


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:40 EST ---
- First please try what $ rpm -qp --requires speech-dispatcher-.src.rpm
  shows, which is apparently against what you expect.
  And $ rpm -qip speech-dispatcher-.src.rpm shows what is happening.

  You can rewrite your spec file from $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib speech-dispatcher
  (/usr/bin/rpmdev-newspec is in rpmdevtools rpm), which should prevent from
  making such mistakes :)

  Also, please write all %description of subpackages before %prep section,
  which is the usually way to write spec files.

- And perhaps to build this package dotconf header files are also needed.

- I am asking why you "disable" "BuildRequires: flite-devel" and so on
  _by default_. On koji build you cannot pass the option "--with-flite" or so
  to rpmbuild, it just does "rpm --rebuild ".


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:49 EST ---
> Review is fine, once a COPYING file is added.

Done

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 13:52 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: fedorainfinity-backgrounds
Short Description: Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds
Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file 
activity for mounted file systems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:00 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyfits  - Python interface to FITS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:03 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:08 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:09 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:06 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:11 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:13 EST ---
I assume you just want a devel branch here? or ? 
Please use Fedora account system names for Owners. ;) 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of 
the NX Server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:14 EST ---
cvs done. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of 
git


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:18 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mpich2 -  An implementation of MPI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:16 EST ---
Thank you Tom for resolving the license issue.

Updated package with the clarified license and latest upstream release is
available below, please review. 

ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm
ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:51 EST ---
devel branch is automatic, no ? I need no others...

FAS name might be mclasen

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438105] Review Request: libconcord - L ibrary to talk to Logitech® Harmony® univ ersal remote controls

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® 
universal remote controls


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 14:49 EST ---
> Looks like we just need to get upstream to get the GCC patch included
> upstream (not necessary, I guess, just nice) and wait for the licensing
> fixes.

I believe this is all done upstream now. If you spin a new .spec with this, I'll
approve it.

BTW, latest upstream CVS has Python and Perl bindings now. Do you intend to add
these into sub-packages sometime (after initial approval/checkin/build/push is
fine by me)? I can try and help out with the Python bindings at least if you 
need.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyfits  - Python interface to FITS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with 
konqueror


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 15:25 EST ---
I've been trying since Sunday to test the rpm, but I've been hit by several
bugs. First konqueror would not start, then (twice) I hit
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg00690.html

Rex, feel free to review the bug yourself if so you wish. All I can do is to
upgrade my F8 for the 4th time and hope for the best.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file 
activity for mounted file systems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 15:41 EST ---
Thx for the review !

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK)

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101


Bug 401101 depends on bug 437960, which changed state.

Bug 437960 Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of 
file activity for mounted file systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441570] New: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570

   Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec
SRPM URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-6.src.rpm
Description: DNX is an event broker module and set of worker daemons for Nagios 
that transparently distributes service checks among a set of designated worker 
nodes. The spec contains a main package, "dnx", which contains the worker 
daemon, and a subpackage, "nagios-dnx", which contains the event broker module.

This package is based on the openSUSE package by John Calcote. I have included 
a patch to disable the unit test that runs the daemon, which fails inside mock. 
This problem exists in openSUSE's build system as well, and is documented here:
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2008-02/msg00198.html

As this is my first package submission, I will need a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy 
devices


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 16:27 EST ---
I've updated to spec/SRPM to -3 to change the install line (otherwise I'd 
forget).

I have been planning to try to do some reviews but I just haven't had time yet
(maybe later this week).  There are some other things I will want to submit once
I get settled, but time has been an issue there as well.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a 
system for an upgrade


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 16:45 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: preupgrade
Short Description: Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade
Owners: skvidal, wwoods, katzj
Branches: F8, devel
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a 
system for an upgrade


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 16:50 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||177841
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||441114
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441595] New: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595

   Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd-0.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: An MPD (Music Player Daemon) client library written in pure Python.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical 
namespace permissions system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 17:15 EST ---
I'll do a pre-review:

* source files match upstream:
   0e964e9273c606c46afbd311b5ad4d77
3_01.txt
   7fc74905125cbfe4af78530e7db92583
HNP-1.1.2.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
? package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   mediawiki-HNP = 1.1.2-1.fc9
  =
   mediawiki >= 1.10
   mediawiki-StubManager >= 1.1.0
 
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I'm not sure how you would go 
  about testing this, anyway.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
? %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 16:32 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical 
namespace permissions system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 17:27 EST ---
Heh, you took the checklist out of my mouth.

I can fill in:

* package installs properly.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

To check the last one, do rpm -qpd mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm and
check that those files aren't actually used by the program.  It's generally 
obvious.

I'd approve this, and since I know that the infrastructure folks want this soon,
I'll go ahead and do so.  I hope that Josh doesn't think I'm stealing his 
credit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in 
Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 17:32 EST ---
Hi Michel. The dependencies have just been approved and you can start reviewing
this package and #440681 now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a 
wiimote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 17:35 EST ---
I don't see you in the account system; is this your first package for Fedora?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast 
media streaming servers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in 
Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680


Bug 440680 depends on bug 440678, which changed state.

Bug 440678 Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua 
language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in 
Lua


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680


Bug 440680 depends on bug 440679, which changed state.

Bug 440679 Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a 
wiimote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:10 EST ---
I started to do a pre-review but the package wouldn't build as is.

You need to start by adding python-devel >= 2.4 to the BuildRequires

Doing that produces the following error:

RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cwiid-0.6.00-py2.5.egg-info

Take care of those 2 things and I'll do another pre-review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a 
wiimote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:11 EST ---
Also, you need something under changelog and your package is not rpmlint clean:

cwiid.src: E: description-line-too-long Cwiid is a library that enables your
application to communicate with a wiimote using a bluetooth connection.
cwiid.src: E: no-changelogname-tag


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical 
namespace permissions system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:21 EST ---
I tried.

Thanks for the tip, I appreciate it.  This looks interesting, I'll probably play
around with it some.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:24 EST ---
Pre-Reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:27 EST ---
Sorry, for some reason I wasn't on the CC list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a 
wiimote


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:40 EST ---
Ok, I built the packages by adding 
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info to the python2 %files
section (I do not know if this is the correct thing to do or not, I don't know
what that file is used for)

For testing purposes I took care of the easy things for rpmlint (description too
long and summary ending in . and no changelog) which produced the following
output on the built packages:

cwiid.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/libcwiid.a
cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/cwiid.h
cwiid-python2.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cwiid-python2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cwiid.so 0775
cwiid-wmgui.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized wiimote connectio test 
application
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/buttons
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/gamepad
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/neverball
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang 
/etc/cwiid/wminput/nunchuk_acc_ptr
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/ir_ptr
cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/acc_ptr

Remaining packaging guidelines:
MUST:
+ rpmlint output
  see above
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
- package should satisfy packaging guidelines
  not rpmlint clean
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches actual package license
- includes LICENSE file in %doc
  does not include LICENSE file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
- package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  Does not build with sources provided.  Builds on x86_64 once initial
recommendations are met
+ ExcludeArch bugs filed
- BuildRequires list all build dependencies
  needs python-devel >= 2.4
? %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
+ static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
+ packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages

Optional:

+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
+ translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if 
available
+ builds in mock
+ builds on i386 and x86_64
? review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin

Take care of those things and I'll do another pre-review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop 
backgrounds


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 19:55 EST ---
Built

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 20:00 EST ---
I get this error trying to build:

DEBUG util.py:250:  No Package Found for java-rpmbuild

Looking over the spec quickly:

* BuildRequires:java-devel >= 1.6.0

This needs to be >= 1:1.6.0, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java

* Source:

Should be a fully-qualified URL here.

I'll do a full check once we get those things fixed.  Taking this review.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 20:05 EST ---
Excellent. Thanks. 

I would be happy to sponsor you... can you continue the process at: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with 
konqueror


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 20:33 EST ---
Package Review
==

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format 
%{name}.spec.
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 Tested on: devel/x86_64
 [x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM:
W: patch-not-applied Patch2: konq-plugins-4.0.1-icons.patch
-> Sebastian ? Should this patch be applied ?
binary RPM:
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/uachanger/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/uachanger/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/fsview/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/fsview/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/validators/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/validators/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/dirfilter/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/dirfilter/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/babel/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/babel/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/imgallery/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/imgallery/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/webarchiver/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/webarchiver/common 
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/crashes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/crashes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/khtmlsettings/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/khtmlsettings/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
-> acceptable for a KDE package
 [x] Package is not relocatable.
 [x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 License type:GPLv2+ and BSD and LGPLv2+
 License tag: GPLv2+
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
 SHA1SUM of package:not available, source is a svn checkout.
  Running diff on the individual files mostly match. There are however 24
different source and graphic files and 864 different translation files. All
differences seem to be due to sv

[Bug 441610] New: Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure object serialization

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441610

   Summary: Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure
object serialization
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/Cerealizer.spec
SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/Cerealizer-0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Cerealizer is a Python module for object serialization similar to 
the
pickle module. Unlike pickle, it is secure and implemented in just 300 
lines of Python.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical 
namespace permissions system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-08 22:54 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: mediawiki-HNP
Short Description: An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions
system
Owners: ianweller
Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 (right?)
InitialCC: 
Cvsextras Commits: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:12 EST ---
cpdup-1.07-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 
'rare events' handling


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:15 EST ---
mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable 
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug 
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |CLOSED
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE
   Fixed In Version||1.07-1.fc7




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:15 EST ---
cpdup-1.07-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:18 EST ---
latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-demjson -  Python JSON module and lint checker


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:16 EST ---
python-demjson-1.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository.  
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-demjson'.  You can 
provide feedback for this update here: 
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-2942

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 
'rare events' handling


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:18 EST ---
mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable 
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug 
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:18 EST ---
python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. 
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-textile'.  You can 
provide feedback for this update here: 
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2978

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 438102] Review Request: ocaml-facile - OCaml library for constraint programming

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-facile - OCaml library for constraint programming


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438102





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:22 EST ---
ocaml-facile-1.1-2.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:21 EST ---
latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If 
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: javasqlite


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-09 01:22 EST ---
javasqlite-20080401-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite

2008-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: javasqlite


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |CLOSED
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE
   Fixed In Version||20080401-2.fc8




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


  1   2   >