[Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 02:03 EST --- Am I supposed to see package in main repo in F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446800] New: Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Summary: Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: EBNET is a protocol to communicate to the EB library that is a C library for accessing CD-ROM books. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - unique is a library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - unique is a library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 02:23 EST --- Created an attachment (id=305633) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=305633action=view) updates for the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - unique is a library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - unique is a library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 02:23 EST --- I found yet a few issues - the gtk-doc docs should be moved into -devel and R: gtk-doc added, whole unique dir owned - the lines for packaging the headers can be simplified to one, the current style is useful when you need to pick only some files/dirs into multiple subpackages - the -devel subpackage should R: dbus-glib-devel and gtk2-devel, so they are downloaded automagically when your package has BR: unique-devel - also keep writing changelog entries even during the review see the patch in attachments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446651] Review Request: rvm - RVM library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rvm - RVM library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 02:30 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rvm Short Description: RVM library Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: unique -|Review Request: unique - |unique is a library for |library for writing single |writing single instance |instance applications |applications| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 03:19 EST --- Changes made, many thanks. New spec: http://www.packagekit.org/temp/unique.spec New SRPM: http://www.packagekit.org/temp/unique-0.9.4-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 03:38 EST --- I have done a rebuild on Rawhide without BR: libtool and it works, so please remove it when uploading the spec into the CVS. OK source files match upstream: 5980013ab57c5391f63c9171d39c325f15584838 unique-0.9.4.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK* BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, ldconfig is called. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel. OK pkgconfig file in -devel, dependency on pkgconfig exists. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 03:43 EST --- Hello,Thanks for your efforts to contribute the src.rpm. I just have a question. If I am correct I think we can change the compile options to compile the source code,e.g. the different fortran compiler we can use. When building from src.rpm,can I also set the different compiler to get the final rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446653] Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446653] Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 04:42 EST ---
+ rpmlint output
coda-client.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/venus
- This is the Coda cache manager, and I'm assuming that it
doesn't listen on any network ports, so is safe to run by
default.
coda-client.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name venus
- rpmlint is complaining that the script is called 'venus' but
the package is called 'coda-client'. There doesn't seem to
be anything in the guidelines which mandates that they be
given the same name.
coda-vcodacon.x86_64: W: no-documentation
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
GPLv2
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
e80184573ed83cdf20d74a0e5861b24d
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
x86-64
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
Although I didn't get to verify this by building it in Koji.
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
- reviewer should build the package in mock
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
=
This package looks fine.
Obviously it depends on 3 other reviews being approved first before
it can go into CVS.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 04:45 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: unique Short Description: Library for writing single instance applications Owners: rhughes Branches: F-9 InitialCC: rhughes Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446814] New: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 Summary: Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Lookup is an integrated search interface with electronic dictionaries for Emacsen. You can use various kinds of dictionaries, such as CD-ROM books and online dictionaries, in an efficient and effective manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 05:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) Would you consider maintaining or allowing someone else to maintain EPEL branches of this package. I could be very useful in EPEL. OK, I'm not planning to use the package on my CentOS box myself but I agree that it might be useful. I'll maintain it myself for EL-5 since the codebase is pretty slow target anyway. Thanks for the reminder! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 05:31 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: mod_bw New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 05:46 EST ---
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is not silent but produces only one warning (may be safely omitted):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/lwp-*
lwp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec matches the actual license.
+ File, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in
%doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]$ md5sum lwp-2.4.tar.gz*
5bd3221562de580d51f18c547f7606e3 lwp-2.4.tar.gz
5bd3221562de580d51f18c547f7606e3 lwp-2.4.tar.gz.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture (i386).
+ No build dependencies.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of
Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ Everything a package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are in a -devel package.
+ Package is 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability).
+ The library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package.
+ The devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Not a GUI app.
+ Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
To review this package was easy and now it's
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 06:14 EST --- Got a little bit further, now it fails the unit tests on ppc: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=612162name=build.log Since I don't have access to a working ppc machine, raised with upstream to see if they know anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 05:57 EST --- The README.ipv6 file seems to be out of date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446411] Review Request: perl-Event-Lib - Perl wrapper around libevent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-Lib - Perl wrapper around libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446411 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 06:00 EST --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-Event-Lib.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/9/SRPMS/perl-Event-Lib-1.03-2.fc9.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Perl wrapper around libevent Changelog: - Add Missing BR for test All tests went successful now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438156] Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 07:56 EST --- Initial import failed: Access denied: limb is not in ACL for rpms/inksmoto/devel I would think this'd have worked, it's been 13 hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446841] New: Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Summary: Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sippy.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sippy-0-1.20080515cvs.fc9.src.rpm Description: The B2BUA is a SIP call controlling component. Unlike a SIP proxy server, which only maintains transaction state, the B2BUA maintains complete call state and participates in all call requests. For this reason it can perform number of functions that are not possible to implement using SIP proxy, such as for example accurate call accounting, pre-paid rating and billing, fail over call routing etc. Unlike PBX-type solutions such as Asterisk for example, the B2BUA doesn't perform any media relaying or processing, therefore it doesn't introduce any additional packet loss, delay or jitter into the media path. Few remarks: * This is not a B2BUA itself, but rather a library for creating ones (two examples included). * This package still not released as tarball * I'm in doubts about naming scheme. Although it looks ugly but we use python-foo naming scheme, so maybe I should rename it to python-sippy? * I placed working examples into %docs/examples (and therefore raising rpmling warnings) but maybe I must place them into %bindir or %sbindir? Every comments and suggestions will be highly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:20 EST --- Taking this. First note: due to defective libsexy requires, it needs a BuildRequires: libxml2-devel see bug 446842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:17 EST --- As per comment #30, this is a resurrection of a long-dead package. As Jason rightly says, it's been dead.packaged for ages, so my request is to take ownership. Andreas would be welcome to have ownership although ISTR (perhaps incorrectly) that I tried to contact him ages ago and got no response or negative. I will forward this bug to him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:21 EST --- With that fix, it builds fine, and rpmlint has nothing to complain in the generated packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) The README.ipv6 file seems to be out of date. So it should not be shipped I guess, was that the intention of your comment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:27 EST --- it seems to work fine, we just need to work out where to set the gconf key /apps/notification-daemon/theme to enable this by default. Formal review in a bit, when I get to the office. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:35 EST --- p.s. Peter, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:33 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lwp Short Description: LWP thread library Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446653] Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:37 EST --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: coda Short Description: Coda distributed file system Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes p.s. Any chance you could take a look at the rpc2 review, plenty of comments but no reviewer sofar, should be even easier to review then this one :) , see bug 446652. Once that is approved the coda stack is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 08:59 EST --- Ok, New version ready for review: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike-music-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Basicly the tarbal was respun to include the earlier omitted numbers, no other changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) I don't see this bug as showstopper since there is no E-frontend for NM yet Agreed. Also I noticed a missing pkgconfig Requires for the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:17 EST --- Downloading. It's a fair bit bigger. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:20 EST --- Taking for review (in an hour or so) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446847] New: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A Nagios plugin that will test a SIP server/device for availability and response time. Although this package was easy to cook I've got some thoughts: * This package requires nagios-plugins-perl which requires nagios-plugins. Shoul I drop this explicit Requires: nagios-plugins? * Original spec-file from Mandriva folks has SysV-scripts in %post and %postun sections (commented out by me). But our nagios-plugins package doesn't have any of these scriptlets - should I drop them completely from this package? See also: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/nagios-plugins/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:21 EST --- CC'ed Mike McGrath as current nagios-plugins maintainer (sorry for disturbance). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:37 EST --- In CVS and built in Koji. As far as I can see this now will be pushed to rawhide, and I need to request builds Bodhi for F9/F8? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=612341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442692] Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442692 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:36 EST --- In CVS and built in Koji. As far as I can see this now will be pushed to rawhide, and I need to request builds Bodhi for F9/F8? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=612373 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:54 EST --- enm.pc bug is now fixed upstream: http://enlightenment.org/viewvc/e17/libs/e_dbus/enm.pc.in?r1=1.1r2=1.2 I will patch that with sed expression before uploading spec to cvs. Need for binaries is yet to be clarified. Missing pkgconfig will be fixed too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:43 EST --- Looks great. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 09:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Taking for review (in an hour or so) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442692] Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442692 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:02 EST --- Yes, after some consultation, filing it in bodhi as 'enhancement' is the right thing to do (at some point, bodhi will also grow an explicit 'new package' type, but for now, 'enhancement' is the closest) You should also add the new package to comps at an appropriate place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442692] Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442692 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:09 EST --- See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CompsXml for some hints about comps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio
sound server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:13 EST ---
o xmms-config comes from xmms-devel, so I think we're ok, there.
o Also, xmms-devel does indeed require xmms-libs:
$ rpm -q --whatrequires xmms-libs
xmms-devel-1.2.10-38.fc9.i386
o I think you're right about the libtool cleanup business. I get around that by
installing just the files we care about with %{__install} instead of make
install - I suspect using 'make install' and cleaning up like you're doing is
the preferred method.
o lynx is used to generate the docs (lynx --dump), so I have a README.html and a
style.css - not really a big deal at all though if you want to leave those out.
I see that I forgot to include the ChangeLog in mine.
Henry,
I'd recommend that you take the xmms_outputdir macro from my spec file and use
it in yours, since I think it's nicer than %{_libdir}/xmms/Output/, but I
don't think any of the other differences matter.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:33 EST ---
+ rpmlint output
rpc2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
I guess it might be a good idea to shift files such as 'README.ipv6'
into -devel?
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
Very general name though. At first I thought (and hoped) it was
an improved SunRPC system. I wonder if anything apart from Coda
uses RPC2?
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
b28e3291d71bb36a374fb85d65125276
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
x86-64
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
However I didn't get a chance to build this in Koji, because
lwp isn't in Rawhide yet,
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
- reviewer should build the package in mock
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
+ review should test the package functions as described
Tested in as far as it builds Coda.
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin
===
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 10:35 EST --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: vegastrike-music Short Description: Music for Vega Strike Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: antlr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:02 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:00 EST --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rpc2 Short Description: RPC2 library Owners:jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446508] Review Request: cflow - Analyzes C files charting control flow within the program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cflow - Analyzes C files charting control flow within the program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446508 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:03 EST --- Sorry about that, updated package: koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=611960 spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/cflow/cflow.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/cflow/cflow-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225616] Merge Review: bison
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bison https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225616 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:04 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225614] Merge Review: bind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225614 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:03 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225675] Merge Review: db4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: db4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225675 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:04 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:03 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:03 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225685] Merge Review: device-mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: device-mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225685 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:04 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226416] Merge Review: shadow-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: shadow-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226416 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jpackage-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225245] Merge Review: am-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: am-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225245 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:02 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:04 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225752] Merge Review: filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225752 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226510] Merge Review: udev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: udev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:06 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226202] Merge Review: nspr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nspr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226202 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225619] Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:04 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226157] Merge Review: module-init-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: module-init-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226157 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:05 EST --- formal review: package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legible: extremely buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a upstream sources: ok BuildRequires: need to add libxml2-devel locale handling: n/a ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: ok static libs: ok pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel package: n/a la files: ok gui apps: ok directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Summary, fix the BuildRequires, then it is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 235929] Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-odbcng - PostgreSQL ODBCng driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235929 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:06 EST --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 437046] Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_bw - Bandwidth Limiter For Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437046 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:10 EST --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:09 EST --- ok, makes sense. I guess if Andreas wants to maintain or co-maintain he will speak up. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: awesfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:10 EST --- Still fails. . .failed gcc43 autorebuild too. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225626] Merge Review: brltty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: brltty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:18 EST --- Just retried with the newest SRPM, still fails for me. How is it that koji built this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438156] Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:32 EST --- Should be fixed now. Can you try again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:38 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444933] Review Request: cairo-dock - Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-dock - Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444933 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:36 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430427] Review Request: BrOffice.org - Brazilian release of OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BrOffice.org - Brazilian release of OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430427 Bug 430427 depends on bug 358021, which changed state. Bug 358021 Summary: pt_BR version of OpenOffice.org needs to be called BrOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=358021 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:46 EST --- Beautiful. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445847] Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:46 EST --- Oops, commented on wrong bug. Ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:45 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446651] Review Request: rvm - RVM library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rvm - RVM library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:47 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:44 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:46 EST --- Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed: SPEC: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/notification-daemon-engine-nodoka.spec SPRM: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-0.1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438156] Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:48 EST --- Works great. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:48 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446653] Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coda - Coda distributed file system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 11:50 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446407] Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unique - library for writing single instance applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 12:17 EST --- Build in F-9 and devel, many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225648] Merge Review: compat-gcc-296
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: compat-gcc-296 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225648 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 12:39 EST --- Looks like we should close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 12:43 EST --- This version works with ocaml-gettext: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df-2.1.1-5.fc10.src.rpm * Fri May 16 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.1.1-5 - Reenable ocaml-gettext-devel BR and get it working properly. - Use find_lang to find PO files. - +BR ocaml-fileutils-devel (not strictly needed, but a dependency of gettext). - +BR ocaml-camomile-data except on ppc64. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=612794 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mailman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
Version|devel |rawhide
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 12:48 EST ---
rpmlint on SRPM:
mailman.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib,
/usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.
FIX
mailman.src:135: E: configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure
options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}.
FIX
mailman.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 59, tab: line 121)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.
Minor, but FIX
mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-crontab-edit 0755
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange
permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
I don't see where this gets used. ???
mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-migrate-fhs 0755
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange
permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
This is installed at 0644. FIX.
On RPMS:
mailman.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib/mailman/messages/et/LC_MESSAGES
02775
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs
included in your package.
This is for several languages.
mailman.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib/mailman/templates/no 02775
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs
included in your package.
mailman.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Post.py 0644
This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If
the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits,
otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere.
mailman.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/contrib/mm-handler /usr/local/bin/perl
This script uses an incorrect interpreter.
mailman.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mailman/data 02775
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs
included in your package.
mailman.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/contrib/qmail-to-mailman.py @PYTHON@
This script uses an incorrect interpreter.
mailman.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm
/usr/lib/mailman/pythonlib/japanese/mappings 02775
A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this
message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs
included in your package.
mailman.i386: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/admin/doc/mailman-admin.txt
The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it
in the specfile for example using iconv(1).
mailman.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/admin/doc/mailman-admin/index.dat
mailman.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/logrotate.d/mailman
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not
a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
mailman.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/admin/doc/mailman-member-es/index.dat
mailman.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/rmlist mailman 02755
The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game,
then, you should use the proper rpm group, or location.
mailman.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Archiver/pipermail.py 0644
This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If
the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits,
otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere.
mailman.i386: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.10/admin/doc/mailman-member-es.txt
The
[Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mailman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 13:13 EST ---
Source URL should match:
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Other that that and the above, it looks generally OK.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442404] Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:04 EST --- Imported to cvs, built for rawhide. Thanks to everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443303] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:11 EST --- Approved. One thing we need to figure out is how to make sure that users get this theme. We can probably patch the default gconf value in notification-daemon for now, but longer-term it would be nicer if the metatheme spec had a field for notification themes, and the appearance capplet handled it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225648] Merge Review: compat-gcc-296
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: compat-gcc-296 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225648 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:15 EST --- Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225648] Merge Review: compat-gcc-296
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: compat-gcc-296 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225648 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:34 EST --- Because compat-gcc-296 dropped from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:43 EST --- Now that F9 is out, what is the next step here? Updated tarballs and spec file at http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 14:55 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-File-Tempdir Short Description: This module provides an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Owners: jfb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: jfb Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-16 15:26 EST --- Falcon-0.8.8-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
