[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-21 02:01 EST ---
The Bash trick should really be unnecessary: your package is noarch, so even on
64-bit systems the files will be in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/... , never
/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y/... . The invocation you're using actually returns
/usr/lib64 on 64-bit systems, which is not where your files end up installed.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python:
It might be a good idea to generate the wrapper script during the packaging
process, though:
Put this at the top of the specfile:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
(note: not get_python_lib(1) which gives you the arch-specific directory)
%install
...
cat > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/vnc2swf-edit << EOF
exec python %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/edit.py "$@"
EOF
But do you really need to do this? edit.py works just fine if you symlink it.
Likewise with vnc2swf itself. I'd suggest just symlinking them all to /usr/bin.
Could not reproduce the ImportError you're getting -- movie comes from pyvnc2swf
so I'm not sure why you're getting that. Is that from *after* you install the
RPM or before?
Note that the recordwin script has, hardbaked into it, x11vnc and xwininfo.
x11vnc is part of libvncserver, but apparently it's not shipped in the Fedora
package at all. You might want to file a bug asking for it to be included, and
meanwhile, %exclude %{_bindir}/recordwin.sh from the %files section?
edit.py throws some exceptions if called without the right arguments; you might
want to fix the code path so that if any argument is missing, it exits after
displaying the error messages rather than attempting (futilely) to continue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447599] Review Request: immix - image mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: immix - image mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447599 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-21 00:20 EST --- Builds with no errors from mock fedora-9-i386, and no output from rpmlint on the installed package. The specfile looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #309963|mock build log |build log from mock description|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 23:54 EST --- (From update of attachment 309963) No errors building abgraph with mock: mock -r fedora-8-i386 rebuild abgraph-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447607] Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abgraph - ABGraph is a simple tool to benchmark webservers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 23:53 EST --- Created an attachment (id=309963) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309963&action=view) mock build log The build log from building abgraph with mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 23:19 EST --- Links changed: http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto.spec http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/release/presto-0.1.1-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452195] Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Presto - A tilemap engine using the Allegro game programming library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452195 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 23:04 EST --- I've fixed the errors you pointed out, Ignacio, as well as a few other things. Most notably, Presto no longer links with Allegro during build. This is because Allegro contains some non-PIC assembly code that rpmlint doesn't want to allow. rpmlint now complains about undefined references to Allegro functions due to not linking, but the end user can link with Allegro when using Presto. The only other solution to this would be to either remove or change the assembly code in Allegro, neither of which I want to do. Here are the updated SRPM and spec links. I've built the SRPM using mock with no errors, and gotten rid of all the rpmlint errors. http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto-0.1.1-6.fc9.src.rpm http://www.hypersonicsoft.org/projects/downloads/Presto/misc/presto.spec Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 21:40 EST --- new version tkabber - 0.11.0 ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SPECS/tkabber.spec ftp://ftp.l14.ru/pub/repo/FC/9/SRPMS/tkabber-0.11.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 20:21 EST --- Thank you for your quick review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mfiler3 Short Description: Two pane file manager under UNIX console Owners:mtasaka Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 19:43 EST --- > Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec > file creation. I don't understand. If I opend this review, it was because I was working on the spec file. > Please, review. It seems you are the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 19:36 EST --- Uploading new specfile for version 0.4.16. Tested: * build of noarch & src package * rpmlint * basic functionality, RSS, scan, newt-based 'client' on F9 and rawhide * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.noarch.rpm * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive-0.4.16-1.fc9.src.rpm * specfile in attachment or here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/clive/clive.spec Please, review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452324] New: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 Summary: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE- based terminal emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxterminal-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxterminal.spec Description: LXterminal is a VTE-based terminal emulator with support for multiple tabs. It is completely desktop-independent and does not have any unnecessary dependencies. In order to reduce memory usage and increase the performance all instances of the terminal are sharing a single process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 18:27 EST --- 0.9.6.2 has a problem, I think. The tarball is out of whack, and nobody has (yet) responded to my posting here: http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel/browse_thread/thread/815a9f9c53215345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 18:08 EST --- Looks like all of the deps are in Fedora now, so I'd love to try and review this. By the way, it looks like 0.9.6.2 is out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445028] Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pylons - A python web application toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445028 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] New: Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Summary: Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL-3.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The PyGreSQL package provides a module for developers to use when writing Python code for accessing a PostgreSQL database. This is actually not a new package: we have been shipping it for a long time as part of the postgresql SRPM. However, the upstream project was split off from core postgresql quite some time ago, and now has its own tarball name and version numbering. To track this properly we need to split out PyGreSQL as a separate SRPM. I've also taken the opportunity to try to make the packaging conform to current guidelines for python modules, which the present postgresql-python package is rather far away from. Once this package is accepted I will remove PyGreSQL from the postgresql SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 17:40 EST --- I'm pretty sure dennis intended to set fedora-review to '+'. "dgilmore" is not a valid FAS account; using "ausil". CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 17:41 EST --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/diary-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm - Update to the new release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452317] New: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Summary: Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts-20080619-1.fc10.nim.src.rpm Description: Heuristica is a serif latin & cyrillic font, derived from the "Adobe Utopia®" font that was released to the TeX Users Group under a liberal license. See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Heuristica_font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446993] Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 16:48 EST --- Michael asked me to take a look. I find it useful to comment on the found rpmlint complaints as many of them are bogus, but that's not always easy since rpmlint doesn't really give any indication of how much import you should give to its spew. Here's my take: obm.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides obm-core This is bad since you currently provide every possible version of obm-core, which makes it impossible for anything to depend on a specific obm-core version. You must provide a version. obm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) I simply ignore these annoying warnings. I mean, it's nice if they're cleaned up, but come on. obm.src: W: strange-permission obm-config.sh 0755 rpmlint complains about any executable in the src.rpm; I've never seen this as being problematic but I'm not sure you can count on files in src.rpm having any specific permissions. Note also that a more recent rpmlint gives: obm.src:304: E: files-attr-not-set The %files list for the -services subpackage is missing the %defattr line. The non-stanrard-uid complaints are OK. The README.fedora file really shouldn't be executable. structure_tables.sql should be passed through iconv; there's an extended ASCII character in the first line and the file doesn't containing any specific information about how it should be displayed. What is the point of the obm-rpm.conf file? If it needs to be there but shouldn't initially hold anything, can we at least put a comment in there? What is obm-config? I'm guessing it's not a pkgconfig file, and if so then the rpmlint complaint is bogus. The mysql.sql file should not be executable. The no-documentation warnings are OK as long as there isn't some bit of relevant documentation that's been missed. I personally would use "obm-satellite" and "obm-mysql" as I dislike mixed-case package names; qt3-MySQL is the only non-Perl/Python module that uses that case, for example, while 59 packages downcase it including the mysql package itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452306] New: Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Summary: Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/tcl-pgtcl.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/tcl-pgtcl-1.6.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The tcl-pgtcl package contains Pgtcl, a Tcl client library for connecting to a PostgreSQL server. This is actually not a new package: we have been shipping it for a long time as part of the postgresql SRPM. However, the upstream project was split off from core postgresql quite some time ago, and now has its own tarball name and version numbering. To track this properly we need to split out pgtcl as a separate SRPM. I've also taken the opportunity to try to make the packaging conform to current guidelines for Tcl extensions, which the present postgresql-tcl package is rather far away from. Once this package is accepted I will remove pgtcl from the postgresql SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:45 EST --- The BuildRequires: pkgconfig is not needed because the other -devel BuildRequires pull in pkgconfig anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:23 EST --- Re: the rpmlint warnings, I also get mfiler3-mdnd.x86_64: W: no-documentation which isn't a problem. I would probably delete the zero-length BUG file in %prep to avoid complicating the %files list, but I don't see it as a particularly significant problem. My Japanese is just good enough to puzzle out most of the homepage, and most of it is gairaigo anyway. One thing I couldn't quite get is the "bug" section mentioning, I think, excessive memory consumption. Maybe that's what should be in the BUG file. I think I'll have to take your word on the license; I don't see any mention of the GPL version anywhere, but there are some non-ASCII comments in the source which don't render in UTF8 for me. I guess it's conceivable that there's something in there, though I don't think it likely. * source files match upstream: 6d22b511a3279764c357b4355ac1c9b21354338b52e8d7eb0c47f5c50783db06 mfiler3-1.0.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: mfiler3-1.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm config(mfiler3) = 1.0.0-1.fc10 mfiler3 = 1.0.0-1.fc10 = /bin/bash config(mfiler3) = 1.0.0-1.fc10 libgc.so.1()(64bit) libmigemo.so.1()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libonig.so.2()(64bit) libtinfo.so.5()(64bit) mfiler3-mdnd-1.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm mfiler3-mdnd = 1.0.0-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/env mfiler3 = 1.0.0-1.fc10 ruby(gtk2) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. It seems to run fine although I didn't try to do much with it. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:16 EST --- Hi - congrats to Alan Dunn, I think this looks like a good package! Just a note - my comment 20 described how to wrap up coqtop using rlwrap when you invoke coqtop interactively. Unfortunately, Alan Dunn found that doing that has some problems. For example, pasting sometimes doesn't work as expected. So he's convinced me that this automatic wrapping should NOT be done, and that his packaging as it stands is the better approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.9.4-5.fc9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:15 EST --- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.1.2-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.9.0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:15 EST --- xmms-pulse-0.9.4-5.fc9.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:14 EST --- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:14 EST --- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451406] Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tempita - A very small text templating language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451406 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:13 EST --- python-tempita-0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:13 EST --- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||4.12-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:12 EST --- curl-7.18.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:13 EST --- hdrprep-0.1.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:14 EST --- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448292] Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbpanel - a lightweight X11 desktop panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448292 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:12 EST --- fbpanel-4.12-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:07 EST --- ale-0.9.0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:09 EST --- sk2py-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:11 EST --- curl-7.18.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.9.24-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451681] Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sk2py - Migrates Cadence Skill based PCells to Python PyCells https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:06 EST --- lazarus-0.9.24-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:07 EST --- tex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451408] Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiproxy - HTTP proxying tools for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451408 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 15:07 EST --- python-wsgiproxy-0.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 14:54 EST --- Unfortunately this site is down: http://scicommunity.com/ I have found many game demos on this site: http://agisci.classicgaming.gamespy.com/sierradm.shtml ...but this site needs a fileplanet account. I have not found any other sources. That wont be sufficient, or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449928] Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwfut - WorldForge update tool library Alias: libwfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449928 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||libwfut Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452282] Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 14:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) > One question: At work, I am behind a firewall and the only way > to get out is through the proxy. I use a socks proxy with > cvs and curl, but I could not figure out how to make koji connect > (I tried tsocks which is what I use with cvs, to no avail). Do > you have any suggestions? As it is I am building from home, which > is not ideal. Well, I am not a expert of koji and currently I cannot tell you how to deal with that soon. Maybe it is better that you ask on fedora-devel-list. > Should I close this ticket? Yes, now I am closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452282] New: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452282 Summary: Review Request: mfiler3 - Two pane file manager under UNIX console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mfiler3/mfiler3.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/mfiler3/mfiler3-1.0.0-1.fc9p.src.rpm Description: Minnu's Filer3 is a two pane file manager under UNIX console. koji scratch build for dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=673171 for dist-f9-updates-candidate http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=673235 rpmlint: mfiler3.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mfiler3-1.0.0/doc/BUG mfiler3.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/mfiler3/.mfiler3 For first rpmlint: I added the whole directory doc/ as %doc, so while it is easy to remove this rpmlint I want to leave this for now. For second rpmlint: we can safely ignore this rpmlint. Note: mfiler3 makefile does not support "make install DESTDIR=foo" format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #45) By the way: > Note : I build the SRPM on my box by commenting BuildRequires : ibmtts-devel > I am not sure how to obtain the RPM for this. (Although there is some mention > of > an RPM for this here : > http://ibmtts-sdk.sourceforge.net/howto-make-gnome-speech-ibmtts-rpm.html) > I hope this does not have an undesirable effect? Well, perhaps I don't correctly understand what you mean by "this does not have an undesirable effect?"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:55 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: olpcsound New Branches: olpc-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:54 EST --- Built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 238816] Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:54 EST --- ping, Kelly, I'd be willing to review your qtcurve stack here, if you're still interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:53 EST --- Yes, that thread is a reasonable reference, and doesn't contradict my comments above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:45 EST --- Please read this thread about FreeSCI: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-April/msg8.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:41 EST --- If there's as much as a demo or some non-use-restricted content which can be downloaded from the 'net, then the package is fine. Witness xu4. For the counterpoint, see Exult, which itself is free but for which no free content. (I personally disagree with the exclusion of Exult, but that's neither here nor there.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:31 EST --- I finally was able to come back to it. Two horrid weeks of admin work at my Uni. Anyway, all seemed to have gone well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=53372 One question: At work, I am behind a firewall and the only way to get out is through the proxy. I use a socks proxy with cvs and curl, but I could not figure out how to make koji connect (I tried tsocks which is what I use with cvs, to no avail). Do you have any suggestions? As it is I am building from home, which is not ideal. Should I close this ticket? Thanks for all your help, it really made a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:21 EST --- Note that the latest version of XStream is 1.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 13:16 EST --- perl-XML-RPC is reviewed in bug 435835, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 12:14 EST --- Sorry for the long delay here. ;( rpmlint now says: pm-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 39, tab: line 72) Fix if you like.. not a big deal. pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0755 pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0755 ignore. pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend-hybrid /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend /usr/lib64/pm-utils/bin/pm-action Any luck fixing those? pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log Shouldn't you add a Requires: logrotate and add a logrotate file for this? pm-utils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv pm-utils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv Not sure how to get around those, unless you don't need the mv commands anymore. pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ignore. On the requires, seems like kbd might need to be required for chvt? pciutils was added for a pci.h header, but I don't think it's needed anymore. see bug: 182566 So, I would leave kbd, but remove pciutils... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450323] Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coq - Coq proof management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450323 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 12:02 EST --- One can do slightly better on ppc64 - the bytecode version compiles, but it seems as though any compile fails for ppc64 on f10, I think some change was recently made that breaks compiles there - everything works fine on f9, and a build with a spec file that incorporates the modification to use bytecode on ppc64 is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=671994 In any case, I believe all of the relevant issues people have raised have been addressed and that this package is ready for review for inclusion into the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on
OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |
nThis||
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:51 EST ---
(In reply to comment #45)
For -12:
> > - Also, change the permissions of the file in srpm (i.e. %SOURCEx)
> > to 0644.
>
> I have changed the permissions of the following files to 0644:
> 4] speech-dispatcherd (with execute capability however)
Please also change this (speech-dispatcherd) to 0644 permission.
You can safely do this because anyway you set the permission to
0755 on installation:
-
install -p -m 0755 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/
-
(please fix this when you import this package to Fedora CVS)
> Yes, I am aware. I wrote two pre-reviews (#448458, #448292)
Well actually I reviewed bug 448292 (fbpanel) and your comment
1 was very proper, however I didn't notice that _you_ wrote the comment
:)
Okay.
This package (speech-dispatcher) is APPROVED by me
Please follow the procedure written on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
Now I am sponsoring you.
If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have
to look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
(after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system).
If you have questions, please ask me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Why? Because this is the rule Games SIG has. Interpreters and games that don't follow this rule have been retired and often moved to other repositories. If you think this is not correct you are welcome to post a message in the Games SIG mailing list. More info on this SIG here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included. Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:39 EST --- Yes, he took out the screenshots directory and is using a clean tarball. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:31 EST --- I didnt know that... There are demos and shareware versions but, no the games are not free (i dont think there is any free Sierra game). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:28 EST --- The spec file doesn't seem to follow many Fedora packaging guidelines. Please read them again at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines BTW the latest stable GForge version is 4.5.19 released on 10/11/2007. You should definitely package this version. You should also split it in different sub-packages, like Debian and Mandriva do. You may also want to check other distribution's packages for patches and ideas. Debian: http://packages.debian.org/etch/gforge Mandriva: http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/gforge/current/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452150] Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarp - Tool that resamples and co-adds together FITS images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:28 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:26 EST --- cvs done. I assume the legal blocker is solved with those removals... Spot: Can you confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:21 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452251] Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| Summary|Review Request: libmatthew- |Review Request: libmatthew- |java - collection of java |java - collection of java |libraries |libraries --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:15 EST --- Sorry, but I forgot to mention that this is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452251] New: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452251 Summary: Review Request: libmatthew-java - collection of java libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java.spec SRPM URL: http://omajid.fedorapeople.org/libmatthew-java-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A colleciton of Java libraries - Unix Sockets Library This is a collection of classes and native code to allow you to read and write Unix sockets in Java. - Debug Library This is a comprehensive logging and debugging solution. - CGI Library This is a collection of classes and native code to allow you to write CGI applications in Java. - I/O Library This provides a few much needed extensions to the Java I/O subsystem. - Hexdump This class formats byte-arrays in hex and ascii for display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:09 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xxdiff Short Description: Graphical file/directory viewer Owners: cattelan Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448808] Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:07 EST --- Are you sure FreeSCI can be included in Fedora? Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included. If the answer is yes, it can be included but a package for at least a free game must be submitted too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 10:27 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 10:23 EST --- OK, there is new snapshot upstream, so I have created new .src.rpm (http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout-0.2.201-1.fc9.src.rpm), which builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=672885 I still don't know how to fix the problem with many .mo files, but otherwise this package should be all right (rpmlint is otherwise silent on both src.rpm and noarch.rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 10:25 EST --- URL for .spec file is still the same http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jbrout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|spu-binutils: Binutils for |Review Request: spu-binutils |the SPU on IBM Cell |- Binutils for the SPU on |processors |IBM Cell processors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obm - Open Business Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 10:11 EST --- So it looks like rpmlint output isn't that clean. Most of these would be pretty simple to fix. A few of the warnings seem odd to me. Once these items get cleaned up a little, I can dig into the RPM, install it and offer some more feedback. The package looks close. rpmlint obm-2.1.9-2.fc9.src.rpm obm.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides obm-core obm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) obm.src: W: strange-permission obm-config.sh 0755 rpmlint obm* obm.noarch: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/obm apache obm.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/obm apache obm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obm-2.1.9/README.fedora obm.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/obm-2.1.9/database/support_incident/structure_tables.sql obm.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/obm/obm-rpm.conf obm-config.noarch: W: no-documentation obm-config.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/obm-config obm-MySQL.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obm-MySQL-2.1.9/mysql.sql obm-Satellite.noarch: W: no-documentation obm-services.noarch: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > > python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for > > python > > python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL > > Fixed. Niall: Did you get a chance to update your spec with the review points already mentioned ? If so, please provide the location of your .spec and .src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Needs fixing: > > > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > > package builds in mock: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log > > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run > > So, the only issue under the "Needs fixing" category is the build error you > got > in mock. I'll look into that one. That, and the naming. See below. > Also, did you have any response to my questions (in previous comment) about > how > I should be referencing the source: tarball vs. CVS If you are still working on the feature upstream and it's not released as of yet, I would recommend a CVS snapshot and a pre-release package, yes. Once the utility is included in a real upstream tarball, you can fixup the RPM specfile to use that. While it's a bit more work upfront for the packager, it more accurately reflects the state of the package upstream and gives you a bit more flexibility if you want to respin the snapshot to bring in more fixes, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:15 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tdom New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:09 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tcldom New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-extras- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-package- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC|fedora-package- | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | CC||fedora-extras- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:07 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tclxml New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452211] spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 06:02 EST --- I regret having to say so, but this submission will need a lot of improvements, before it can make it into Fedora. Please make yourself familiar with the Fedora packaging guidelines and with cross-building binutils. Did you compare your spec against those of the avr-binutils? Just 3 points for you to investigate: * Don't replace packages from other packages (e.g. bfd) * Don't use %makeinstall * Check how to install infos and check if your binutils's info install at all (Hint: For cross-binutils built from FSF sources, you need to --disable-infos, because they clash with those of a native binutils). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 05:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec > file creation. Currently this bug is not reviewed by anyone. If you want, you can assign this bug to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 05:23 EST --- Hi, SPEC File for revision 12 - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM - http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-12.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #43) > Created an attachment (id=309770) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309770&action=view) [edit] > Slightly modified init script Thanks for the modification :) > For -11: > > * Source tarball > (In reply to comment #39) > -- > 1038719 20013 19:31 speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > 1039765 2008-06-08 00:04 > speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-11.fc7/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz > -- OH okay, now I am using the correct tarball as available online. > - Also, change the permissions of the file in srpm (i.e. %SOURCEx) > to 0644. I have changed the permissions of the following files to 0644: 1] speech-dispatcher-0.6.6.tar.gz 2] speech-dispatcher.spec 3] speechd.patch 4] speech-dispatcherd (with execute capability however) > Now BuildRequires: makeinfo is missing. Okay had to add BuildRequire : texinfo for makeinfo > - Actually more fixes are needed. Please use "rpmlint" > -- > speech-dispatcher.src:279: W: macro-in-%changelog version > -- Yes :) I did not spot a few macros. (should ve run rpmlint before reporting back) > * Initscripts > - Current initscript seems good, however as I guess showing the status > to terminal is preferred, I modified your script a bit. Alright great! I have incorporated your changes. Note : I build the SRPM on my box by commenting BuildRequires : ibmtts-devel I am not sure how to obtain the RPM for this. (Although there is some mention of an RPM for this here : http://ibmtts-sdk.sourceforge.net/howto-make-gnome-speech-ibmtts-rpm.html) I hope this does not have an undesirable effect? (In reply to comment #44) Yes, I am aware. I wrote two pre-reviews (#448458, #448292) and I will write more detailed reviews now that I guess the speech-dispatcher package is in shape. Furthermore, I have also created an FAS account "hemantg"and have requested membership for cvsextras group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452212] New: Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 Summary: Review Request: heimdal - Heimdal Kerberos libraries and KDC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://abartlet.net/heimdal-rpm/heimdal.spec SRPM URL: http://abartlet.net/heimdal-rpm/heimdal-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Heimdal is a Kerberos distribution, distinct from MIT's krb5. Heimdal is a free implementation of Kerberos 5. The goals are to: - have an implementation that can be freely used by anyone - be protocol compatible with existing implementations and, if not in conflict, with RFC 1510 (and any future updated RFC) - be reasonably compatible with the M.I.T Kerberos V5 API - have support for Kerberos V5 over GSS-API (RFC1964) - include enough backwards compatibility with Kerberos V4 - IPv6 support I'm packaging it for Fedora because I would like Samba4 to depend on a system-provided krb5, rather than rely on it's internal copy of Heimdal. (I also happen to think it's a better Kerberos package :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452211] New: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Summary: spu-binutils: Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package- [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] t.com Spec URL: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/downloads/spu-binutils.spec SRPM URL: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/downloads/spu-binutils-2.18.50.0.6-1.src.rpm These are based on the standard binutils package found in Fedora. I envisage it being updated in lock-step with the vanilla binutils package. It's called spu-binutils (rather than binutils-spu) in following with the convention set by avr-binutils and arm-gp2x-linux-binutils. Description: This package contains the assembler and linker for ELF binaries on the SPU architecture found in the IBM Cell processor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450466] Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extraction tool for user-uploaded video hosts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450466 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 04:50 EST --- Is this being worked on by anyone? Otherwise I can take it and proceed in spec file creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450189] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 04:11 EST --- Just a note: We consider gconf schemas files (under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas) as _not_ config files (perhaps should be moved under %_datadir, however on Fedora they are put under %_syscondir). So usually we don't make gconf schemas files have the attribute of %config (even if rpmlint warns about it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 390951] Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clive - Video extracting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390951 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 03:50 EST --- Sorry, however now new submitter already appears. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450466 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
