[Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.83-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:12 EST --- gamazons-0.83-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:12 EST --- gambit-c-4.2.8-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gambit-c'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-6115 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:12 EST --- lxterminal-0.1.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:14 EST --- python-sphinx-0.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:16 EST --- gamazons-0.83-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:16 EST --- python-sphinx-0.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452688] Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-java - Java implementation of the DBus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452688 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:12 EST --- dbus-java-2.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm GTK version works well (some gadgets are not compatible with Linux -- the obvious system-related ones, and some that ought to be cross-platform). Qt version has some display issue but also works. I'm currently bundling both and have not included desktop file launchers -- will discuss whether we should have a common library and two subpackage, or keep it intact. In any case, I'll add two desktop launchers, with the GTK one configured to NotShowIn=KDE and the Qt one OnlyShowIn=KDE -- or we can make KDE use the GTK binary and disable the Qt interface for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:17 EST --- lxterminal-0.1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:52 EST --- Thanks for review, I'll incorporate the proposed changes (thanks for them!). Here's the question about license: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2739 It should be upstream's forums. I tried several emails on the team page http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/about/team but with no luck yet (all failed to be delivered. Q about splitting: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/node/2740 When I have no luck I'll propose the splitting on my own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 03:52 EST ---
Thanks for the feedback.
Regarding the %{?fedora} conditional - it is required if I want to support
Fedora versions older then 8 (do I?), and Fedora 9 at least seems to still
support it. I would be very surprised if it would be dropped from future Fedora
versions.
I'll contact upstream and see if I can get them to add a license file.
Regarding the rpmlint output:
* I didn't understand the %doc output from rpmlint - I'm using %doc because I
want to package the README and examples, I don't see how it relates to headers
or static libraries. BTW - my rpmlint doesn't report that.
* The uncompressed zip file is an issue with upstream - I decided not to
repack upstream for obvious reasons. The new 0.11.1 version seems to fix this.
I've repacked and published a new version of the SPEC and package for a new
upstream version, and for Fedora 9 (which I'm currently running):
SRPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
SPEC: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib.spec
RPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
The new SPEC file work seamlessly for Fedora 8 and an update package will be
available at http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc8 shortly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 03:58 EST --- There are no questions with regard with license, at least no more than for grace. Files are at: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/grace/devel/cephes-license.email?rev=1.1view=auto http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/grace/devel/LICENSE.cephes?rev=1.1view=auto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 03:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) Bad news - I'm having trouble with the weird Fedora-unique CVS build process, and can't get my SRPM in. Any suggestions? I had a package just accepted so I could try to reproduce, but it works for me. This at least gave the APPEARANCE of working correctly, though I'm not sure if I was supposed to do separate imports for default and F-9. But that's where the docs led me to go, and it didn't complain. Yes, you are supposed to do separate imports. Then I tried to do the following, where it seemed to hang: cd F-9/ make tag make build A possibility is that you didn't run cvs co prior from make tag, make build, and so the imports are not reflected in your working copy. After both make tag and make build, it hung after giving these error messages: rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query In fact, even make help when my current directory was the F-9 subdirectory produced those error messages, instead of something useful. The documentation on the interaction with Fedora CVS could at best be labelled needs work :-(. The fedora docs are always in a needs work state since the build system, the auth system, the wiki... are always in a state of permanent change (with improvements most of the time, and sometime usability regressions but I don't think it is the case now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 04:23 EST ---
Thanks for review.
I fix problems:
rpmlint -i python-tftpy-0.4.5-2.fc9.src.rpm:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
rpmlint -i python-tftpy-0.4.5-2.fc9.noarch.rpm:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Moved 'bin/tftpy_server.py' and 'bin/tftpy_client.py' to %{_bindir}.
Spec URL: http://212.193.33.181/rpm/python-tftpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://212.193.33.181/rpm/python-tftpy-0.4.5-2.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 04:23 EST --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm (spec file's link is the same) Sorry for inconvenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 04:22 EST ---
I think I should have been more clear about keys I am using
x = Checked, - = Problem, ? = No idea. :-)
Regarding the rpmlint output:
* I didn't understand the %doc output from rpmlint - I'm using %doc because I
want to package the README and examples, I don't see how it relates to headers
or static libraries. BTW - my rpmlint doesn't report that.
rpmlint out does not mention it for me either.
* The uncompressed zip file is an issue with upstream - I decided not to
repack upstream for obvious reasons. The new 0.11.1 version seems to fix this
What is fixed by 0.11.1? zip format seems to be still there.
You forget to remove tests/ folder as it is not required.
For trigger I suggest you to refer to reviewer or list or #fedora-devel %if
0%{?fedora} = 8. I will also try to verify, what is correct?
Other then these two points package looks okay to me.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 06:35 EST --- Ok, thanks for your comments and for checking up on the python-setuptools. I've removed the Fedora 8 test, and have new files at: SRPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib.spec RPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm Uncompressed zip: Version 0.10's zip file had all files in stored mode, meaning they are uncompressed. The current 0.11 zip file have all the files compressed properly, so the uncompressed zip warning is no longer relevant. tests/ folder: I'm not sure what you refer to - the tests folder is not packaged into the binary. It /is/ in the upstream source package, but then again I'm providing a pristine source package for obvious reasons so I can't remove it. Currently we're not running the tests as part of the build process because they cause external dependencies to be downloaded automatically (and I don't know how to turn it off), but we would probably want to do it in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 434861] Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 05:46 EST --- I am mixing my keys :P, but you got them right. [-] = Problem or suggestion, [x] = Checked, ? = No idea Package looks okay to me. Just few more optional suggestions [-] Changelog message should be about what changes you did to reach this version. You may consider providing a better log ;-) like issues you resolved. [-] you may consider removing PKG-INFO if you are not installing it from srpm. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:12 EST --- still here, still here :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 05:09 EST --- Searching in 'Package source' at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/ python-setuptools it looks like we don't need this trigger as python-setuptools- devel is available for FC-7 and FC-6 since 9 months now. We don't need to anyway worry about FC-6 ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 04:54 EST --- SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/testing/8/SRPMS/hostapd-0.6.1-1.kwizart.fc8.src.rpm My previous website is down. Here is the last version. I will try to re-work on it later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447080] Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:14 EST --- upstream is dead, and I don't know what to fix in the code. closing as WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:23 EST --- There is not 4. I suck :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:22 EST --- Thank you for packaging a new font! This is not a formal review, just initial advice to make sure the actual review can proceed faster later. 1. Please make sure you've followed all the steps outlined in steps 1 and 2.a of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle 2. Please read attentively http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_packaging 3. Please try to stay as close as possible to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template If you feel you need to deviate (umasks, defattrs, etc) please explain in this review why the deviation is justified. 5. Some comments on your spec after a quick overview A. Please do not create a metapackage B. Please adhere to our font naming conventions (mona-fonts-bitmap, mona-fonts-sazanami etc). Unlike other distributions we do not use the ttf affix C. please ask on fedora-devel if it's not possible to detect font package versions automatically. Your hardcoded versions are going to bite you someday. D. you do not need to BR gzip 6. I seem to remember other core fonts packages used to execute mkfontdir in %post with ghosting. However we do not have any official core fonts packaging guidelines right now. If you feel you've fully researched the subject, and found the best solution, do not hesitate to submit a core fonts packaging guideline draft later. I realise this kind of package represents a lot of work (congratulations), and I hope those comments will help you complete it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:33 EST --- Ok. Please ping me there when you have a new spec ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:32 EST --- If upstream does not answer, do proceed on your own. It's important to try to get issues fixed upstream but do not block on upstream availability too long. I won't be available from end of July till September, so if you stray in this zone, you'll have to wait a little or ask another reviewer. Since most of the review is already done that should not be too difficult. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 07:46 EST --- Package looks ready to me. I agree with you, about keeping pristine source, as it is not anyway in binary rpm. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:01 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-propel_runtime Short Description: An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Owners:akahl Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433045] Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433045 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:02 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-propel_generator Short Description: An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Owners:akahl Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:15 EST --- Thank you for initial comments: For 1: I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage it seems fine. For 2: Perhaps I've read them For 3: 3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache creates font cache in a wrong permission: ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet. I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If you are sure this is not needed now please let me know it. 3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale? 5-AB: Will fix 5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find the version. i.e. If the dependent fonts make update version, then this srpm won't build and someone (or Matt using automated massbuild) complains to me your srpm won't build, please fix it, which is actually what I am intended. 6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_ on current Fedora packaging: related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS Actually one day (before the release of F-8) all packages including core fonts are made to not call mkfontdir or chkfontpath on scriptlet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:29 EST --- Summary: Un Extra families Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-extra-fonts-1.0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. Extra families (10 fonts) * UnPen, UnPenheulim: script * UnTaza: typewriter style * UnBom: decorative * UnShinmun * UnYetgul: old Korean printing style * UnJamoSora, UnJamoNovel, UnJamoDotum, UnJamoBatang Install un-core-fonts for additional fonts. and 1.0.2-pre packaging http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.3.080608.fc9.src.rpm http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-extra-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:31 EST --- Summary: Un Core families Korean TrueType fonts Spec URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://get9.net/rpm/1.0/un-core-fonts-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a set of Korean TrueType fonts. Un-fonts come from the HLaTeX type1 fonts made by Koaunghi Un in 1998. They were converted to TrueType with FontForge(PfaEdit) by Won-kyu Park in 2003. Core families (9 fonts) * UnBatang, UnBatangBold: serif * UnDotum, UnDotumBold: sans-serif * UnGraphic, UnGraphicBold: sans-serif style * UnPilgi, UnPilgiBold: script * UnGungseo: cursive, brush-stroke Install un-extra-fonts for additional fonts. and 1.0.2-pre repackaging http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.3.080608.fc9.src.rpm http://get9.net/rpm/1.0.2-080608/un-core-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) Ok. Please ping me there when you have a new spec ready. revert to the 1.0 stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #13) this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease? I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time Oh I see. So I had misunderstood the upstream versioning intention. Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are strong reasons for shipping a snapshot. revert to the 1.0 stable release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:43 EST --- Hi I think I've made all the recommended changes. The spec and src.rpm are at http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:58 EST --- Hi Jess, hi Gianluca, (In reply to comment #31) For now, can you please verify the Zend/Http/Client.php fix? I've just verified this in HEAD: With php-Fileinfo installed, the correct mime type is returned; without, the default (application/octet-stream). I consider this fixed and not having this feature in 1.5.2 yet is definitely not a blocker issue. There's one minor non-blocker issue you could actually try to promote: Since Zend has decided to not only provide a zipped version of the framework but also a tarball which is most likely meant to target platforms like Fedora (UN*X-likes), please fix file permissions before every release. In 1.5.2, all Gdata-related files have their executable bit set. Right now, this needs to be handled by my installation script. Gianluca: I consider all previous blockers fixed and will upload a 1.5.2 package right away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:04 EST --- Updated SPEC URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-ZendFramework/php-ZendFramework.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-ZendFramework/php-ZendFramework-1.5.0-1.fc8.rc3.src.rpm Changes: - update to 1.5.2 - new package split - removed Cache-Backend-Sqlite, Db-Adapter-Db2, Db-Adapter-Firebird, Db-Adapter-Oracle - removed optional php-bitset requirement from Search-Lucene, not available - removed virtual requires and provides, not necessary anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:05 EST --- Oops, old package URL. Correct one: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-ZendFramework/php-ZendFramework-1.5.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:11 EST --- NB: openvrml-mozilla-plugin-0.17.6-2.fc8 is still broken as per comment #21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:23 EST --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/monafont/monafont.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/monafont/monafont-2.90-2.fc9p.src.rpm dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=698967 dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=698969 * Sun Jul 6 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.90-2 - Gerenal packaing fix according to Fedora fonts packaing conventions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:39 EST ---
I've taken a look at the package because I plan on using it. So:
- minor nitpick: duplicate BuildRequires: zlib-devel (by openssl-devel),
krb5-devel (by openssl-devel)
- what's the reason of defining _version and using %{_version} instead of simply
using %{version}? technically it's OK, but it is also useless
Please let me know when the package is ready for review, for the moment mock
build fails because you BR madwifi bits (which are not available in fedora)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427391] Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427391 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:44 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cl-asdf Short Description: Another System Definition Facility Owners: green Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 09:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Ready for approval, contigent on three things being fixed (listed below): - remove tabs - check with legal on licensing (looks more liberal than LGPL so I'm personally OK with it) - include debian/copyright Thanks. I've just sent a note to fedora-legal-list. AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454199] New: Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454199 Summary: Review Request: pentaho-libxml - Namespace aware SAX- Parser utility library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/pentaho-libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/pentaho-libxml-0.9.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Java Namespace aware SAX-Parser utility library This is a dependency of pentaho-reporting-flow-engine (formerly known as jfreereport) which itself is a dependency of OpenOffice.org3. This package is known as libxml by pentaho but that name is already in use in fedora, hence the suggested pentaho-libxml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 10:25 EST ---
Tim, are you still interested in this bug? 'Cause if you do, there are a couple
of fixes needed. Most important one being the fact that
- you claim the package is noarch but
- in %files you use %{_libdir}/shezhu which leads to the following error:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/var/tmp/shezhu-1.20-1.fc10-OFXMjR
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/shezhu/Makefile
/usr/lib/shezhu/README.loc
/usr/lib/shezhu/access.loc
/usr/lib/shezhu/action.js
[...] (very long list of unpackaged stuff here)
On a different line, I am not sure how important is this fragment from the end
of the build process:
TXT=MIDI BOX=48x14 STR=23x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=12 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/MIDI.gif
TXT=MINI BOX=48x14 STR=23x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=12 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/MINI.gif
TXT=LCDP BOX=48x14 STR=29x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=9 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/LCDP.gif
Error: string width bigger than bounding box, 84 -3
(I usually tend to avoid errors)
In terms of the spec file
- you should also use add -q to setup, in order to silence it
- remove one of the two occurences of perl in the BR line.
- what's the significance of the following lines under %description:
Generic (Build 2008.02.01.12.24)
Supports dates from 01/02/2008 to 31/01/2009 and expires on 01/02/2009
- last but not least, the web page of the project claims that Image::Magick
would be needed, but the spec does not require / use it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 10:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) For 1: I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage it seems fine. I don't see any wiki page on mona in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:In-progress_fonts so you're definitely missing some steps in the fonts packaging workflow. Please check. Those pages were not written for no reason. For 2: Perhaps I've read them Can't answer for you. For 3: 3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache creates font cache in a wrong permission: ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html I didn't know this link but in any case that's a lot of maybes and since almost all our fonts do not use umask (and have been so for a long time) I doubt there is any problem in real life. For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet. This was a mistake of the fonts-japanese packager. Silently changing one package when the same pattern is repeated in many others is wrong. I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If this issue is real it needs to be addressed by guideline changes so every packager (not just the ones aware of this mail post) can fix his packages. In the meanwhile adding umasks not in the guidelines only adds to the confusion. Thus: — please remove umasks from your packages — please submit a guideline change proposal to FPC arguing the need for umask, so the issue can be discussed properly. If FPC deems the umask necessary we'll change all packages including yours. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee 3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale? The defattr mask for font packages has been approved by FPC and FESCO with the font spec template. Official page there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate (unfortunately broken by recent mediawiki migration, the page I gave you is a cleaned-up unofficial version). FPC has generally avoided making statements on defattrs, because they can become quite complex. It has let packagers exercise their good judgement on umasks or not. However in the fonts case a correct deffatr is really simple which is why the fonts guidelines include one (you can probably fish the IRC FPC minutes on the subject if you care to). 5-AB: Will fix 5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find the version. Ok, good enough for me 6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_ on current Fedora packaging: Ok, right, I was not thinking. The actual rule on this is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Install-time_dependencies BTW. I didn't think and didn't have any core fonts packaging guidelines to draw on. Please write some. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447080] Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmemusage - Graphical memory usage viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:10 EST ---
On the spec file:
1. it's generally speaking a good idea to limit changes to the official
template, that makes rebasing after guideline changes easier. So it may be a
good idea to compare your spec with the template in rpmdevtools and try to limit
variations.
2. as stated on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template
the -f flag to fc-cache should not be necessary starting from F9 and the
fontconfig packager requested its removal
3. please remove umasks
4. please add defattrs
5. it's probably a good idea to add some fontconfig rules so fontconfig knows it
can substitute mona-sazanami to sazanami (same for VLGothic). See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips
6. URL could be
URL:http://%{archivename}.sourceforge.net/
7. Source0 could be (probably wrong right now):
Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{archivename}/%{archivename}-%{version}.tar.bz2
8. upstream tarball includes sfd files, and I dont see fontforge in your BR.
Please try to build from sfd sources if possible
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_packaging_policy#Building_from_sources
9. upstream tarball is missing a detached file with licensing statements. Please
ask upstream to add it (this would be asked during formal review)
This informal review is quickly degenerating in a full review *sigh*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) 2. as stated on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template the -f flag to fc-cache should not be necessary starting from F9 and the fontconfig packager requested its removal Ahh.. actually after setting umask 000 and calling fc-cache, fontconfig cache is created with 0666 permission, which is wrong... So umask 133 is _definately_ needed and FPC must discuss this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:25 EST --- Specifyin -f option with 'umask 000' also creates 0666 permission fontconfig cache, which is also wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:34 EST --- Still here. I'll try to patch build system to be more robust. After that I'll try to apply another suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) Specifyin -f option with 'umask 000' also creates 0666 permission fontconfig cache, which is also wrong. -f has nothing to do with permissions, it's a totally different setting. As for your findings, I don't disagree with them, they just seem not to be a problem in actual life (I suspect changing root default umask is so impacting almost no one does this). Nevertheless, as stated before: — do not add an umask when the guidelines says you should not – if you care about the problem have the guidelines changed (it's easy: write a short wiki page on the subject, and submit it to FPC with a mail, the procedure is on FPC's page) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:43 EST --- Hi Alex and Gianluca, Just wanted to let you know the ZF team will release the 1.6 version in approx. 2 weeks. It will include the patches for both the mime_magic/fileinfo and the fix for the cache unit test. I have also written to them about the package permissions issue [the executable bit being turned on where it is not needed] and I asked for them to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) As for your findings, I don't disagree with them, they just seem not to be a problem in actual life (I suspect changing root default umask is so impacting almost no one does this). sudores is affected by this. Nevertheless, as stated before: — do not add an umask when the guidelines says you should not – if you care about the problem have the guidelines changed (it's easy: write a short wiki page on the subject, and submit it to FPC with a mail, the procedure is on FPC's page) Are you suggesting that I have to keep a potentially broke scriptlet until FPC discusses this? (and please keep in mind that usually I won't be able to discuss with FPC members just because I live in Japan... At the time I am writing this it is around 1 am) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 11:54 EST --- Created an attachment (id=311102) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311102action=view) spec diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:03 EST --- So: 1. I've posted a diff you may want to consider, changing your spec a little so it's closer to our templates and easier to review 2. this diff is against the 1.0.2 pre-version spec. I'll let you judge of the version to package, you're better qualified than me and given the timespan between the stable and current version using stable may not necessarily be a good idea. 3. please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_Extra_fonts as requested on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#2.a 4. As noted on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts since upstream chose a GPL license, please get it to clarify its position WRT GPLv3 and at least add the FSF font exception to their GPL text. If they don't answer in a week, proceed as usual (but no embedding exception sucks for korean users) 5. if possible have upstream release sfds and build from them 6. since this font set includes many fonts, it's probably a good idea to write a fontconfig ruleset so fontconfig puts them in the right families (sans-serif, serif, monospace; cursive, fantasy) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:06 EST --- 3. and 4. are a MUST (for 4. at least asking, since we won't block on no answer) 1. 5. 6. are a SHOULD, but you can pass on them if you don't agree with them Anyway this version is much closer to review acceptance, thank you for your work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) Hmmm. I appreciate the point, but it would be an awful lot of hassle to change the name. That isn't to say it isn't possible, but how important do you think it is to change the name? To me it is important, but you could also find another reviewer who don't care about it and approve the package. No other distributions have raised problems with the genericness of the name, although Diary isn't too widely packaged yet. If so it is the right time to do it, before it is widely packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) Are you suggesting that I have to keep a potentially broke scriptlet until FPC discusses this? Yes. Because FPC may have a different perspective from you, and the fact most of our fonts have been shipping without this umask for years (including distro default fonts) strongly hints the problem is limited. If you care about it have the guidelines changed, period. Localized workarounds are wrong. If the problem is not important enough to be fixed distro-wide, it's not important enough to be workarounded in your package. (and please keep in mind that usually I won't be able to discuss with FPC members just because I live in Japan... At the time I am writing this it is around 1 am) Get some sleep please then :). A few hours delay won't hurt anyone. FPC discussion happens by mail and in the wiki page submitted to FPC so being in Japan is not a huge problem. Honestly it just takes a few week to have FPC and Fesco approve a guideline change, so just package without the umask for now, and add it back in a few weeks if FPC decides it's a good idea (if it decides it's a bad idea well, I trust FPC more than any individual packager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454207] New: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 Summary: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Terminator, multiple terminals in one window. This is a little project to produce an efficient way of filling a large area of screen space with terminals. The robot future of terminals I need you review my english (i'm french) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||tokyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |tokyo.ac.jp)| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:25 EST --- Sorry, Nicolas, another big problem is found before discussing packagins issues. After rechecking license issue, README.euc says that ttf font is based on *Kochi font*, which turned before (some years ago) to contain some legal issue and _cannot_ be shipped on Fedora. Although bitmap part is public domain, I think only shipping bitmap part is rather of no use, so I must withdraw this review request. Very sorry for troubling you without checking very fundamental issue carefully... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449962] Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-fonts-hebrew - Support using (Culmus) Hebrew fonts in TeXLive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449962 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:29 EST --- Please don't leave review tickets open after they're done — thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:30 EST --- ikiwiki-2.51-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:32 EST --- np, serves me right by not starting with the licensing bit. I don't care much about the bitmap part, but we have a few bitmap users, so if you want to restart with just this element, it's ok with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449707] Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-c - Gambit-C Scheme programming system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449707 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:44 EST --- *** Bug 450417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450417] Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambit-termite - Gambit-C Scheme programming system, with Termite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450417 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:44 EST --- Termite is now packaged as a subpackage of gambit-c; newer version does not require a modified gambit-c anyway. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 449707 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping
applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:56 EST ---
Mr. Christopher,
If you dont mind I wold like to take this
package for maintainership with yyour permission,
as I already own core GIS ones. My interest is a
comercial one, i would like to push some quality
into this stuff.
First of all let me propose to further review it.
http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapnik.spec
http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapnik-0.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #11)
For 0.5.0-0.2
* License
- The license of mapnik is LGPLv2+.
done.
* Release number
- If this tarball is created from svn repo, IMO it is better
to include not date but svn revision number for Release tag.
done.
Its stable upstream for this time.
* Explicit library dependency
---
Requires: boost
Requires: zlib
Requires: freetype
Requires: proj
Requires: gdal
Requires: cairo
Requires: cairomm
---
- These library related requires should be catched by
find_require.sh and these type of explicit Requries must be
removed (except for some cases such as mono/java related
packages)
done.
---
Requires: python
---
- This requires is not needed and must be removed.
done.
* Requires for subpackages
- Requires for -devel subpackage are not added automatically
and you have to find out and add proper Requires.
* Example:
%_includedir/%name/jpeg_io.hpp contains
---
25 extern C
26 {
27 #include jpeglib.h
28 }
---
This means that mapnik-devel should have
Requires: libjpeg-devel.
The following command is useful for detecting such dependency.
---
$ rpm -ql mapnik-devel | grep /usr/include | xargs grep -h 'include ' | sort |
uniq
done.
---
- Similarly, please check the dependency for -python subpackage
by
---
$ rpm -ql mapnik-python | grep python | xargs grep -h 'import ' | sort | uniq
---
done.
* Fedora specific compilation flags
- This is not yet correctly honored.
done.
* Use of system wide libraries
- build.log shows
---
76 g++ -o agg/src/agg_vcgen_dash.o -c -O3 -fPIC -DNDEBUG -Iagg/include
agg/src/agg_vcgen_dash.cpp
101 ar rc agg/libagg.a agg/src/agg_line_profile_aa.o ..
190 g++ -o src/libmapnik.so -L/usr/local/lib -lagg -lfreetype
---
Here libmapnik.so uses internal libagg.a, not libagg.so provided
by agg-devel.
Please apply patches so that libmapnik.so uses system-wide
libagg.so
- Also
166 g++ -o tinyxml/tinystr.os tinyxml/tinystr.cpp
190 g++ -o src/libmapnik.so tinyxml/tinystr.os ...
Here libmapnik.so uses internal tinyxml, however Fedora has
tinyxml-devel so please use system-wide tinyxml.
- By the way Fedora's optimation level is -O2 and -O3 is not
allowed.
I got rid of local tinyxml, libxml2-devel external replaces it.
I got rid of local agg, external agg-devel replaces it.
* Macros
- Please use macros. For example, /usr must be %{_prefix}.
done.
* Fonts
- Patch1 shows
-
19
datasource_cache::instance()-register_datasources(mapnik_dir +
/lib/mapnik/input/);
20 -freetype_engine::register_font(mapnik_dir +
/lib/mapnik/fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf);
21 +freetype_engine::register_font(mapnik_dir +
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf);
-
However /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf does not exist on
my system.
* By the way is 'mapnik_dir + /usr/' correct?
- Also if you want to use dejavu fonts, it must be added to
Requires (I am not talking about BuildRequires here).
fixed.
Olso other liftups, see from changelog:
%changelog
* Sun Jul 06 2008 Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.5.1-1
- the license of mapnik is LGPLv2+
- release
[Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 12:57 EST --- It's not still broken. You're observing a new bug. This may be the result of the recent change that added -fvisibility=hidden when compiling. This works on F9; but possibly the firefox/xulrunner headers on F8 don't specify the symbol visibility for symbols that require external linkage. Please file a new bug. And please include the output of $ nm -D /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/openvrml.so | grep NP_ Substitute lib64 if you're on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 13:04 EST --- Additional Remark: Tests from %check sections now pass everything, strange was that with old internal static agg it failed in two points. Sounds good for proper functionality. //cristian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 13:07 EST --- 1. ok 3. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UN_Extra_fonts -updated wiki page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 13:41 EST --- Please don't forget to change the wiki page status next time. Anyway, please do 4. and at least look at the others now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454208] New: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 Summary: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/florence/florence.spec SRPM URL: http://packages.cassmodiah.de/fedora/florence/florence-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Florence is an extensible scalable virtual keyboard for GNOME. You need it if you can't use a real hardware keyboard, for example because you are disabled, your keyboard is broken or because you use a tablet PC, but you must be able to use a pointing device (as a mouse, a trackball or a touchscreen) This is my secound package - I'm looking for a sponsor my first package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 14:09 EST --- For 200805a-2: * Namespace issue - Please fix for too generic names on man pages, too. (by the way, is it really needed to create all symlinks for man pages, too?) * Documents - prove9-apps subpackage can be installed without prove9 package. In such case, documents like COPYING and so are not installed, which is wrong. At least some files should be moved to prove9-apps subpackage. * rpmlint issue: prover9-apps.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/prover9-apps-200805a/apps.examples/run-all prover9-apps.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/prover9-apps-200805a/apps.examples/run-all /bin/csh prover9-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib/libladr.a - run-all script has executable permission bits and this adds unneeded Requires (/bin/csh) to -apps subpackage. Please fix the permission to 0644. - Static archives should have 0644 permission. * test - build.log shows 284 /bin/cp -p utilities/* bin 285 Now try 'make test1'. Would you consider to add %check section and do some tests there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445977] Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ikiwiki - A wiki compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445977 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 15:02 EST --- ikiwiki-2.51-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 15:48 EST --- I made a big mistake please CANCEL review request I have to work on it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:08 EST --- trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:10 EST --- trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:12 EST --- it's my first package, so i need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:16 EST --- Mathieu, could you please explain (even in French) what you meant by The robot future of terminals ? It sounds pretty odd to me and I am not at all sure about the meaning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454208] Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: florence - Florence is an extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:21 EST --- Simon, if you are sure that you want this bug to be ignored, you can close it, by selecting Resolve bug (available below, under Bug Status change). However if you plan to come back with a revised spec, just leave it as it is and submit the new version when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] New: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Synthesis ToolKit in C++ (STK) is a set of open source audio signal processing and algorithmic synthesis classes written in the C++ programming language. STK was designed to facilitate rapid development of music synthesis and audio processing software, with an emphasis on cross-platform functionality, realtime control, ease of use, and educational example code. The Synthesis ToolKit is extremely portable (it's mostly platform-independent C and C++ code), and it's completely user-extensible (all source included, no unusual libraries, and no hidden drivers). We like to think that this increases the chances that our programs will still work in another 5-10 years. In fact, the ToolKit has been working continuously for about 10 years now. STK currently runs with realtime support (audio and MIDI) on Linux, Macintosh OS X, and Windows computer platforms. Generic, non-realtime support has been tested under NeXTStep, Sun, and other platforms and should work with any standard C++ compiler. Note: See the top of the spec file for a list of some open issues. The review should help solving them. This package is a prerequisite for lmms (bug 443771). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454166] Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: griv - a gtk rivchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454166 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:39 EST --- two minor nitpicks: - please bump the release each time you modify the spec. this makes life easier for whoever wants to track the differences - you have some duplicate BuildRequires: libX11-devel (by gtk2-devel), xorg-x11-proto-devel (by libX11-devel) Now, the serious problems - the mandatory compiling flags are not obeyed to. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags for details - packaging a desktop file is not enough to make is useful. You should also follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files in order to a) make sure it is correct and b) install it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 16:44 EST --- Sorry, i've copy it from the official site https://launchpad.net/terminator/ The spec and src.rpm links has been updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 17:15 EST --- Russell, please don't forget to close this bug when the package finally hit the stable repositories. Note that bodhi could have done that for you if you told it this bug's number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] New: Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Summary: Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://gilberte.verdurin.com/apache2-default/germanium.spec SRPM URL: http://gilberte.verdurin.com/apache2-default/germanium-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Germanium will open .emp files and download the songs from eMusic. The .emp files can be opened from the toolbar button, or passed as command-line parameters. This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454134] Review Request: gnome-desktop-sharp - .NET language binding for mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-desktop-sharp - .NET language binding for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454134 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 18:38 EST --- Will this be pushed to F-9 and EL-5 soon? It's needed to update gnome-do -- thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 19:26 EST --- Hi Cristian, (In reply to comment #15) Mr. Christopher, If you dont mind I wold like to take this package for maintainership with yyour permission, as I already own core GIS ones. My interest is a comercial one, i would like to push some quality into this stuff. No problem at all. I was about to give it up - just after I took this up my time constraints changed drastically. More than happy for you to take this over! I think you will need to open a new review request however as I am unsure how to change the reporter field. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454134] Review Request: gnome-desktop-sharp - .NET language binding for mono
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-desktop-sharp - .NET language binding for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454134 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 19:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Will this be pushed to F-9 and EL-5 soon? It's needed to update gnome-do -- thanks! The update of gnome-sharp to 2.20 (which is required for gnome-desktop-sharp to be added to F-9) caused a huge amount of collateral damage in rawhide necessitating rebuilding many mono apps such as f-spot, banshee, muine and others, see the relevant threads on fedora-devel-list: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00159.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00170.html Some are still not yet rebuilding because the jump to 2.20 affects many packages across the entire mono stack in unanticipated ways. I think it's wise to let the dust settle in rawhide before pushing this to F-9, gnome-do users can wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 19:42 EST --- Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator.spec SRPM URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/terminator-0.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Links updated -- added %oost and %postun scriptlets to update gtk icon cache -- modified vendor in desktop-file-install command to fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447751] Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diary - A application to allow you to keep a diary of your life https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 19:45 EST --- I really like to see this package in Fedora because I use it a lot. I'm willing to do the review but I fully agree with Patrice. I think best is to ask upstream if he's willing to rename the package to something like gdiary or gnome-diary (since it uses Gnome's GConv). There already was a project named gnome-diary [1] but it never released something. [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnome-diary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |om) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 20:23 EST --- mail sent to upstream, waiting for response -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
