[Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 03:35 EST --- Sorry, I was in Africa for 3 weeks with no internet access. I applied all your points except: + Why not include contrib/simple-mtpupload in %doc? reason: It contains perl script that could pull in a perl dependency, which shouldn't be otherwise needed. The questin is whether /usr/share/doc is a good place for scripts anyway. IIRC the s390(x) excluding is because it simply doesn't have USB support. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 04:53 EST --- New SRPM: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/libacpi-0.2-11.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/libacpi.spec I changed 'just run' to 'only run' and redid the patch to apply without fuzz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:35 EST --- Very well, package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:33 EST --- The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version 1.2 that builds with the same spec and patches RPM Lint: OK, silent Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK, GPLv2+ Actual License: OK, no license file but code says GPLv2+ %doc License: No, license is in the code Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: Upstream tarball disappears when new version is released. Newer version 1.2 builds with the same spec and the same patches, so no problem. Might wanna contact upstream to make them have the tarballs around a little longer though. Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK package approved in principle, but you might want to bump the version and contact upstream about the disappearing tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457030] Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-attributes - Attributes for Ruby (GEM) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457030 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:38 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-attributes Short Description: Attributes for Ruby (Gem) Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: kanarip Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:48 EST --- forgot the new URLs: Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/yacpi.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/yacpi-3.0.1-10.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:47 EST --- Due to the stricter checking implemented now in rpm, you'll have to replace %patch -p1 with %patch0 -p1, otherwise the patch is not applied. fixed - Neither rpm_opt_flags Wow - good catch. Fixed. I've also notified upstream. - nor parallel build flags are taken into consideration Fixed - the created debuginfo rpm is empty ... because the makefile was stripping the binary. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:47 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xlog Short Description: Logging program for Hamradio Operators Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:01 EST --- The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version 1.2 that builds with the same spec and patches Verified building with 1.2, I will initial import the newer version and contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:02 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:19 EST --- Package looks fine now. = APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gphoto2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:18 EST --- Just chmod -x simple-mtpupload and rpm will no longer pull perl as dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review-Request: maatkit - |Review-Request: maatkit - |Essential command-line |Essential command-line |utilities for MySQL |utilities for MySQL Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:22 EST --- rpmlint doesn't like the license GPLv2 or Artistic. As this seems to be a missing license in rpmlint / the Fedora license page I have opened bz #457486 against rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:29 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:41 EST --- Requires: gecko-libs = 1.9 for f9+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:39 EST --- Review = [+] source files match upstream: 2b2b00a179740548035a1145bbae600db9b0a2ce [-] package meets naming and versioning guidelines: please use libproxy-python instead of libproxy-binding-python [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [-] Requires are proper: xulrunner does not use soname's so please add Requires: gecko-libs = 1.9 to the plugin-mozjs package. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=745038 [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent: It isn't: --- libproxy-binding-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-kde.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-mozjs.x86_64: W: no-documentation libproxy-plugin-networkmanager.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. But this warnings can be ignored. [+] ldconfig is used in %post and %postun [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. === Summary Comments: 1) Please use libproxy-python instead of libproxy-binding-python 1.1) Any reason why the java and C# bindings aren't packaged? 2) Fix the gecko-libs requires 3) Consider submitting the patch to upstream (if not done already). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:23 EST --- darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:24 EST --- darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:27 EST --- thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:28 EST --- thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:42 EST --- Juan Patrice, thanks for picking this up! It already looks quite good (submission and review). Wrt the name: don't change it please, the HEP community is very familiar with the root name. Patrice, if we identify the non-free dependencies, maybe we can contact upstreams and make them adapt their licensing like it happened for ARPACK. It's is very slow (so this review should not wait for them), but it seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #3 from S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 19:53:36 EDT --- I updated the spec file to reflect the issues raised by Kevin: SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gadmin-squid.spec SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/el5/SRPMS/gadmin-squid-0.1.0-0.3.el5.src.rpm point 1: I don't know if the URL I updated to is a good one, but it is better than the previously used one, I'm sure. point 2: although the license included is GPLv3, the src/* indicates indeed GPLv3+, so changed in the spec. point 3: files added point 4: although no problem, changed anyway :) point 5: missed that one, upstream does it that way, changed in a patch and will contact upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 --- Comment #6 from Kairo Francisco de Araujo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 20:02:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: procbench Short Description: Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs Owners: kairo Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Customer Facing|NO |--- Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #38 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 21:35:21 EDT --- This one has been done for some time now. Setting the review flag to + and closing this bug out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456398] Review Request: why - Why software verification platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456398 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 22:18:12 EDT --- Excellent! I checked and confirmed that you've fixed the blocker (not including the license file). rpmlint is now 100% silent (which is good; that means the buffer overflow protection, etc., will now work properly). I started up the graphical gwhy and confirmed that (1) you can now navigate the filesystem using the GUI, and that (2) you can work with files not in the current directory. Looks good. I did a try with binary_search.c, and confirmed that it now works with Zenon (which already has a Fedora package). Zenon doesn't do a _great_ job, but it does prove some verification conditions. Reducing the number of default columns is a big help; new users will be overwhelmed enough. I think it's ready for release. Congrats! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457212] Review Request: gadmin-squid - graphical configuration tool for squid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457212 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 23:59:49 EDT --- Humm... all the issues I saw appear to be solved, but you made an additional change I am unclear on: Why add: BuildRequires: autoconf BuildRequires: automake and change the configure line to use %GNUconfigure ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-03 00:05:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-03 00:07:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-03 00:08:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
