[Bug 469808] Review Request: pstreams-devel - POSIX Process Control in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469808 Aaron S. Hawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Hawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 02:27:56 EDT --- What's the significance of doxygen as a build requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 02:18:08 EDT --- (fedora-review flags must be set by a reviewer, please revert) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469816] Review Request: perl-App-Cmd - Write command line apps with less suffering
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469816 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||470179 Bug 469816 depends on bug 469743, which changed state. Bug 469743 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 02:16:27 EDT --- I swear I fixed those "manpage" references in the %description. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||470179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||470179 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470179] Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||470178, 469627, 469816 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470179] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Alias: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470179 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MooseX::Getopt and App::Cmd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-App-Cmd OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-App-Cmd-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module marries the App::Cmd manpage with the MooseX::Getopt manpage. Use it like the App::Cmd manpage advises (especially see the App::Cmd::Tutorial manpage), swapping the App::Cmd::Command manpage for the MooseX::App::Cmd::Command manpage. Then you can write your moose commands as moose classes, with the MooseX::Getopt manpage defining the options for you instead of 'opt_spec' returning a the Getopt::Long::Descriptive manpage spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 01:49:37 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 01:48:22 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-libvisual-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 01:49:02 EDT --- I have a new SPEC in original location, and a new SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/projectM-jack-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 --- Comment #2 from Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-06 01:42:51 EDT --- I actually already built it with mock. The reason I left out cmake was because I had put it as a requirement for libprojectM-devel. I now understand that it was the wrong way to go about it, but I believe all of the above is corrected. New SPEC in same location. New SRPM: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-qt-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469627] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Path-Class - A Path::Class type library for Moose
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469627 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||470178 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470178] Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||469627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470178] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470178 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile - An abstract Moose role for setting attributes from a configfile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-ConfigFromFile OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-ConfigFromFile-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is an abstract role which provides an alternate constructor for creating objects using parameters passed in from a configuration file. The actual implementation of reading the configuration file is left to concrete subroles. It declares an attribute 'configfile' and a class method 'new_with_config', and requires that concrete roles derived from it implement the class method 'get_config_from_file'. Attributes specified directly as arguments to 'new_with_config' supercede those in the configfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470177] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations Alias: perl-Module-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470177 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Util - Module name tools and transformations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Util OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Util.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Util-1.04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module provides a few useful functions for manipulating module names. Its main aim is to centralise some of the functions commonly used by modules that manipulate other modules in some way, like converting module names to relative paths. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=919203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470173] New: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Summary: Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/m4ri.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/m4ri-20081028-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: M4RI is a library for fast arithmetic with dense matrices over F_2. The name M4RI comes from the first implemented algorithm: The "Method of the Four Russians" inversion algorithm published by Gregory Bard. M4RI is used by the Sage mathematics software and the PolyBoRi library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:57:34 EDT --- Thanks Jason. Account is already set up (iarnell) and CLA accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:42:53 EDT --- Ok, this package is next. Here are my notes: * rpmlint on the SRPMS or SPEC gives: libprojectM-qt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) which can be fixed easily. * There is no file containing the license text. Please inform the upstream. The license as of it is should be GPLv2+, which is correct. * Source0 must be corrected * The package does not (directly or indirectly) depend on another package that owns on /usr/share/pixmaps (please verify this). Thus it must own /usr/share/pixmaps * The empty doc line %doc can be taken off, if there's no reply to the license query from upstream. * I find the description (*) for the devel package insufficient. What it says is true for any devel packages. I would copy the contents of the description from the main package and paste it to the beginning of the devel's description, and after that add the (*) to the end. * You must BR: cmake I recommend you using "mock" to figure out BR's. * No headers in devel? (just checking) * The pc file needs patched as you did for the libprojectM package (to fix the /usr/lib(64) issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:08:29 EDT --- shed-1.13-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:09:04 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:03:26 EDT --- mirrormanager-1.2.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:03:54 EDT --- ttf2pt1-3.4.4-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:04:39 EDT --- cfdg-fe-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:05:30 EDT --- fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 23:03:37 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 22:23:52 EDT --- It's been a while since this was submitted although the last blocker was only recently closed. Unfortunately I think upstream has moved on a bit as I can no longer fetch the upstream source. Did you want to update the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 22:11:18 EDT --- Also, the License: tag is not correct. The LICENSE file contains exact what is termed the "Modern Style with Sublicense" on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT, implying that "License: MIT" is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989
Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 22:05:59 EDT
---
I'm sorry that you have not received a response to your submission. If you are
still interested in submitting this package, here are a few comments:
Is there any arch-specific code in this package? I don't see anything
compiled, and there are no binaries included in the final rpm. Are you sure it
shouldn't be noarch?
No version of Fedora less than F8 is supported, so you should simply remove the
conditionals that refer to such old versions (especially the FC3 one; that's
long dead). If you intend to build for EPEL then you may need some
conditionals for that, but they should be indicated as being for EPEL. Also,
please note that the package doesn't actually work on those old releases; it
doesn't even build on F8 because your files list explicitly specifies the
egg.info file, when F8 and older don't generate one.
Your files list can be as simple as a single line:
%{python_sitelib}/*
Is there any particular reason for the complex file list you have now? As a
bonus, that would actually let you build on F8 without conditionalizing.
NAME.txt has DOS line endings and should be converted.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Casey Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Casey Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 21:59:07 EDT --- Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 21:29:07 EDT --- Nope, he's already in the packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 445208] Review Request: rubygem-rapt - Rails Plugin Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445208 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 21:25:21 EDT --- I've no idea why nobody has commented on this yet, but I went to take a look and found the above links invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 20:56:38 EDT --- Yes, that's better, thanks. This package looks fine. Please go ahead and get your account set up, accept the CLA and apply for membership in the packager group. I will sponsor you. * source files match upstream: aa819d16345b537a88b539f5afe9a90b3ddf208a21ea5f89f0bc0850fe0a05d5 Cache-FastMmap-1.28.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: CImpl.so()(64bit) perl(Cache::FastMmap) = 1.28 perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) = 1.28 perl-Cache-FastMmap = 1.28-2.fc10 perl-Cache-FastMmap(x86-64) = 1.28-2.fc10 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Cache::FastMmap::CImpl) perl(XSLoader) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=315, 23 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 4.30 cusr 0.67 csys = 5.05 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #20 from Rakesh Pandit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 20:53:54 EDT --- I never did a complete review. It failed at that time, to build. Reason: + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/pfstools-mDATA.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .mDATA --fuzz=0 + aclocal /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1: line 41: aclocal: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DDk9s1 (%prep) RPM build errors: Misses buildrequire automake. I will do a complete review shortly. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Lubomir Rintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 20:44:44 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Conrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #29 from Conrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 20:35:38 EDT --- Any new comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470070] Review Request: perl-URI-FromHash - Build a URI from a set of named parameters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470070 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] New: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Summary: Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword.spec SRPM URL: www.math.uchicago.edu/~eskin/xword/xword-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Xword is a GTK program that works well for doing crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format used by The New York Times and others. As well as a clock, it supports printing. It also auto-saves puzzles as you solve them so that you can return to partially completed puzzles. This package is based on the debian/ubuntu package. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |.com) | --- Comment #3 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 19:33:00 EDT --- Sorry, I've been a bit busy as of late. I'll put this on hold for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 19:11:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 19:10:54 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 19:08:57 EDT --- perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 19:00:58 EDT --- pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pympdtouchgui-0.302-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 18:54:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 18:49:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469564] Review Request: hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request:hunspell-fj |Review Request: hunspell-fj |- Fijian hunspell |- Fijian hunspell |dictionaries|dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #31 from Robert Scheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 18:00:44 EDT --- Theoretically packagedb works, in fact when I'm using it, only the flavor broken is available. Anyway solved with help of abadger1999 on #fedora-admin: [23:35:05] < rsc> who broke packagedb? [23:35:11] < abadger1999> rsc: I did. [23:35:12] < rsc> I'm not able to release an ownership. [23:35:23] < abadger1999> rsc: Which page? [23:35:26] < rsc> abadger1999: I knew that ;) [23:35:31] < abadger1999> heh [23:35:32] < rsc> abadger1999: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi [23:35:47] < rsc> cwickert shall get owner and I as co-maintainer (so just vice versa change) [23:36:35] < abadger1999> rsc: Do you get an error message? [23:36:59] < rsc> abadger1999: that would made me lucky. Just nothing happens. Even no ajax animation. [23:38:24] < abadger1999> rsc: can you try refreshing the page for me and hitting it again. [23:38:31] < rsc> of course. Hang on. [23:38:44] < rsc> Refreshed, will click now. [23:38:57] < abadger1999> If I'm lucky, you hit the page while I was restarting the servers and they lost the session information. [23:39:00] < rsc> Clicked to all three butons. [23:39:09] < rsc> *buttons [23:40:22] < rsc> abadger1999: anything nice found? [23:41:20] < abadger1999> rsc: Nope. I see the request that you put in before but not the one you're putting in now. [23:41:45] < abadger1999> Ah hah [23:41:46] < rsc> maybe the buttons itself are broken? [23:41:47] < abadger1999> There it is [23:42:13] < abadger1999> Oh wait... That's the login URL [23:42:24] < abadger1999> 1 minute ago [23:42:43] < rsc> hmpf. [23:42:57] < rsc> re-login now. [23:43:13] < rsc> clicked "released ownership" again, nothing happend [23:43:53] < abadger1999> Let me try... I'm in cvsadmin which sometimes means I can't reproduce the error but worth a shot. [23:44:47] < abadger1999> Yeah. Something's broken. [23:45:09] < abadger1999> Ah... I updated some of the javascript... since that's static it gets cached. [23:45:17] < abadger1999> Let me clear mod_cache on the proxies [23:50:34] < abadger1999> rsc: Okay, try again [23:51:26] < rsc> abadger1999: works. [23:51:28] < rsc> cwickert: take it. [23:51:39] < cwickert> rsc: mom... [23:51:41] < rsc> abadger1999: thank you. So you really broke it? ;) [23:52:36] < cwickert> abadger1999: I can't take the package from rsc, the button does nothing for me ether [23:52:52] < abadger1999> rsc: heh :-) Somewhat [23:52:52] < rsc> cwickert: haha! [23:53:13] < rsc> abadger1999: okay, now you've to switch back, that he can take it. Looks like this is maybe the old JavaScript? ;) [23:53:19] < abadger1999> cwickert: Refresh the page and try again. I needed to flush the cache on the web servers when I upgraded. [23:54:02] < abadger1999> rsc: yeah. The old javascript was in the cache. But it referenced things that are no longer in the new server. So things broke. [23:54:12] < cwickert> abadger1999: I did reload the page... [23:54:12] < abadger1999> after flushing the cache, the new javascript should be being saved. [23:54:23] < cwickert> let me restart my browser [23:54:53] < abadger1999> Hmmm... yeah if it's still broken after that, there's something fishy going on... it's being cached somewhere. [23:55:41] < cwickert> abadger1999: works now [23:55:54] < cwickert> rsc: ok, now re-add the permissions you need [23:56:05] < abadger1999> cwickert: Cool. [23:56:36] < abadger1999> rsc, cwickert: Thanks for letting me know about that. I need to add flush the cache to the TurboGears SOP. [23:57:03] < rsc> cwickert: done, you've to approve the spam flooding now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244371] Review Request: sugar - OLPC desktop environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244371 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:57:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:51:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469756] Review Request: perl-Sort-Naturally - Sort lexically, but sort numeral parts numerically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469756 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:50:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469748] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Log-Log4perl - A Logging Role for Moose based on Log::Log4perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469748 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:47:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469750] Review Request: perl-Term-Size - Simple way to get terminal size
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469750 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:48:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469743] Review Request: perl-IO-TieCombine - Produce tied (and other) separate but combined variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469743 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469563] Review Request: hunspell-sw - Swahili hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469563 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:43:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469565] Review Request: hunspell-la - Latin hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469565 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:45:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:43:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469564] Review Request:hunspell-fj - Fijian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469564 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:44:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:41:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:39:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469492] Review Request: bam - A fast and flexible build system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469492 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:38:00 EDT --- The description seems very generic here. Let me know in a new request if you would like to update it to something more descriptive. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:34:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469560] Review Request: pympdtouchgui - mpd client designed for touchscreens
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469560 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:35:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469579] Review Request: skychart - Planetarium software for the advanced amateur astronomer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469579 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:30:32 EDT --- Note that if it fails to build on ppc64, you MUST file a bug against the ppc64 blocker. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:28:11 EDT --- How can I do this in packagedb? I have been an owner right from the beginning and have all privileges, still packagedb lists Robert as owner, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/beldi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438587] Review Request: libsqlite3x - C++ Wrapper for the SQLite3 database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:27:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:28:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994
Christoph Wickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 17:06:40
EDT ---
The %files section of this package is broken:
%{_datadir}/*
does not work, because now liveusb-creator also owns
%{_datadir}/applications and
%{_datadir}/pixmaps
Kushal, please use something like
%{_bindir}/*
%{_sbindir}/*
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/*.png
%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop
or even better:
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_sbindir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/fedorausb.png
%{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop
This way you make sure you don't accidentally package unwanted files.
Nigel, please review more carefully next time, "No duplicate directory
ownerships" should really mean "No duplicate directory ownerships". ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470140] New: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470140 Summary: Review Request: nettee - Network "tee" program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/nettee-0.1.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://saf.bio.caltech.edu/nettee.html Description: nettee is a network "tee" program. It can typically transfer data between N nodes at (nearly) the full bandwidth provided by the switch which connects them. It is handy for cloning nodes or moving large database files Koji scratch builds: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918707 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=918700 rpmlint output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint -i nett* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i nettee* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 16:46:16 EDT --- Is there some reason you can't make this change in the packagedb yourselves? There's no CVS admin action involved here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||perl-Math-BigInt-GMP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 16:11:48 EDT --- I have a few other packages that I have submitted that are actively being reviewed, but not any approved package yet. I did add the NEED SPONSOR tag to the first package I submitted. As far as I have understood I can not become a member of the packager group until my first package is approved. It might well be that this package will be the one approved first, since it is less complicated than the others, has no patches applied, and very closely follows the template in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 Christoph Wickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 16:12:00 EDT --- Robert and I agreed to switch primary ownership. Package Change Request == Package Name: beldi Owners: cwickert, robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #7 from Casey Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 14:59:23 EDT --- Looks all right to me. Do you need sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #19 from Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 14:56:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libprojectM Short Description: music visualization library Owners: imntreal Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: imntreal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 13:17:40 EDT --- I don't feel competent to fully review this package but I can make a few comments: You shouldn't duplicate all of those %doc files between the various subpackages. I'm curious as to which guideline you believe mandates that you split off the libsbuild package. Generally library splits are only required to prevent multilib conflicts, but I don't believe this is a multilib package. (For one thing, it has no -devel subpackage.) There are a few rpmlint complaints: dchroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/dchroot root 04755 dchroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dchroot 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/schroot root 04755 schroot.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/schroot 04755 Obviously these are intended. dchroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dchroot ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-releaselock ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-mount ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/schroot/schroot-listmounts ['/usr/lib64'] schroot.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/schroot ['/usr/lib64'] These are problematic. The tarball seems to include a large amount of doxygen-generated documentation. Is that of any use to end-users? If so it should probably be packaged, although a subpackage might be useful. I agree that a security review would be useful, but I'm certainly not the one to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 12:54:07 EDT --- [I'm traveling again...] (In reply to comment #17) > *now=>not, updated=>update, funde=>files > *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) Not a good to refer to kajo data, it gets removed at ta short while. I didn't see it. Re the documentation: I added some more files but they really are not necessary. As I said before, it's stupid on rpmlint's part to insist on doc files for all these packages. The -libs subpackage still doesn't have any but this is just fine. There is nothing to say. Anybody who needs to know more will find the main package, pfstools, and read the docs there. Find the latest srpm and spec file here: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-4.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Stefan Posdzich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Stefan Posdzich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 12:37:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kcirbshooter Short Description: A small puzzle game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 12:14:44 EDT --- autotools may be crap, but at least it's known crap 8-) If you have an example of a Makefile, that builds a shared library and works on all supported/soon to be supported architectures (including mingw), then I'd be interested! The archive also contains the source code for supporting zip files (in addition to gz and bz2). This code has been sent upstream, and the author agreed (on Jan 2008) to include it, but apparently hasn't gotten around it. I will ping again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462253] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462253 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:59:07 EDT --- I'm confused too - I certainly never modify spec files without automatically rebuilding and testing corresponding rpms. I can't rule out copying the wrong src.rpm to the server though - I've replaced it with a fresh rebuild (and redownloaded and rechecked that I've really uploaded the correct thing this time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:51:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1) you're missing desktop-file-utils in BuildRequires Right, fixed. > 2) gcc 4.3 problem: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=918010&name=build.log Also fixed. Thanks for the suggestions! New package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/nightview.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/nightview-0.3.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:53:08 EDT --- So you're saying that all of the .c, .cpp and .h files in zfstream-autotools.tar.gz are part of the build system? That seems difficult to believe. Obviously if toc doesn't work we have to do something. I'm surprised that someone thinks autotools is an improvement over anything, but so be it. Still, adding new source goes beyond a simple buildsystem change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:46:18 EDT --- gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.3.20081023hg.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:27:14 EDT --- zfstream-autotools.tar.gz has been written by me. Yes, it has been sent upstream, but the author won't take it, as he is also the author of toc, the original build system. I tried half a day to get toc working, without success. Even if I got it to work, it would unlikely have worked and picked the correct compiler flags etc. for any architecture I don't own (i.e. everything but x86). So it seemed far less work to just drop in autotools scripts. And autotool is working and maintained for pretty much all architectures fedora supports, so it seems to me that with autotools build scripts, I will have a better chance of getting the packages to compile and run on other architectures as well. See the similar discussion on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438587 BTW: I do not intend to actually fork the project source code, just replace the build system, as it proved unworkable for me. I will send source code changes upstream, and the author will apply them. He's just not keen on replacing the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Chris St. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |eyan.edu) | --- Comment #4 from Chris St. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:24:52 EDT --- Yes, I intend to fix all of these issues in the next version of Fedora DS Graph, but release of that has been held up by some unrelated issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:23:22 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-05 11:21:22 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO; I will close this soon if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
