[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 03:28:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Together with Till, I have tested some builds of kopete-cryptography. Unfortunately there seems to be an issue with the new package: Encrypting and signing seems to work fine. But if I receive any encrypted (and/or signed) messages, no message is shown in kopete. To be sure this is not a personal issue, we used the Fedora-KDE Live CD, updated to KDE 4.1.3, installed the fresh built kopete-cryptography, and set up a fresh gpg setup. Unfortunately the problem shows up again: You cannot receive any encrypted messages. You do not even notice you got a message if that one is encrypted and/or signed :-( As this is a show stopper for kopete-cryptography, does anybody have a clue about this or can reproduce this issue? Ok, this is show stopper for me, thanks for testing. I should set up environment to test it myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux - FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 06:09:15 EDT --- Hi, I fixed some mistakes on my spec file and update it ! Thanks akurtakov ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 08:41:35 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 08:42:26 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 08:59:47 EDT --- While I appreciate the functioning part of the review, it would be of great value to at least get this into rawhide, so that some wider testing could occur. (it's a part of upstream kde.org extragear releases, if there is a bug, I'm sure it could be fixed... provided we could get ample testing/investigation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 09:18:59 EDT --- For -4: * Timestamp - For this package CPPROG='cp -p' is not useful (so this can simply be removed) because this package does not use install-sh (anyway keeping timestamps is not useful because all files to be installed (except for %doc files) are created at %build stage) Other things is okay. --- This package (gpshell) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 09:17:36 EDT --- Okay, now gpshell is in good shape, I will approve this package This package (globalplatform) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 --- Comment #8 from François Kooman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 09:30:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/gpshell.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gpshell-1.4.2-5.fc10.src.rpm - remove keep timestamps on make install as install-sh is not used anyway Thanks for your time! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 09:24:23 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
partimage.src: W: strange-permission create_certificates.sh 0775
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
partimage.src: W: strange-permission partimaged-passwd 0755
A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
Why are these runnable by non-root users?
RPMS: addressed above.
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK.
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines
.
OK.
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Generally OK, but drop the image location macro, and remove the user created in
the preun conditional.
- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
OK.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
OK.
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is
unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora
is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest
(http://www.ioccc.org/).
OK.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Source URL still uses shortened SourceForge name, fix.
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
OK.
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work
on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next
to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla
entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the
comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and
replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as
blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues:
FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc ,
FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64
OK.
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK.
- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
OK.
- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each
subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig.
An example of the correct syntax for this is:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
NA.
- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
NA.
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples.
Needs to own %{_datadir}/partimaged.
- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK.
- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
See above.
- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
OK.
- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines .
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #12 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 07:47:19 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm sorry for the long delay, but in the meantime most items are fixed. After the build checked using a non-privilege user makerpm the quality of the rpm using rpmlint (and as root used mock too). There are 2 items I'm apparently not able to fix (most likely I do not know how to fix these). 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Both errors pop up with root, under my account and with the special makerpm account, but none of these users have an impact with this (build/install is ok). [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ ls rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpm -ivh rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1:rear ### [100%] [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ cd .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ ls SOURCES/ rear-1.7.9.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/rear.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23801 ... + cp -pr CHANGES README doc/readme.txt contrib /var/tmp/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.9 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf ... $ rpmlint -i SPECS/rear.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i SRPMS/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.9 == only warning: file listed twice notices as with the rpmbuild phase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474149] New: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Summary: Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: * Designed for 2D video games. * Circle, convex polygon, and line segment collision primitives. * Multiple collision primitives can be attached to the same rigid body. * Fast collision detection by using a spatial hash for the broad phase. * Extremely fast impulse solving by utilizing Erin Catto’s contact persistence algorithm. * Support for collision callbacks based on object types. * Impulses applied to contact points can be retrieved after the impulse solver has finished. * Several kinds of joints available. * C99 implementation, no external dependencies. * Ruby extension available. * Simple, read the documentation. * Unrestrictive MIT license. SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk-4.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/chipmunk/chipmunk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473591] Review Request: iFuse - Mount Apple iPhone and iPod touch devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473591 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 05:09:13 EDT --- Improved and simplified the git package creation. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ifuse-0.1.0-3.20081201gitd159256.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #21 from Stefan Ruppert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 03:03:39 EDT --- I'm the author of some parts of the ARM4SDK but I'm not the copyright owner. Also it seems that the ARM4SDK development is dead since 2003 or 2004. In the meanwhile I have founded my own company MyARM. And we at MyARM would also prefer to see the ARM4SDK license changed to a free license. I can write an email regarding ARM4SDK license change to the people how were involved in the development of the ARM4SDK at that time! David, you are right release delay of the ARM4SDK was about licensing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #5 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:00:00 EDT --- A new upstream version is available which I have packaged keeping in mind the above suggestions Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/sovix.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/sovix-0.0.1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #20 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 09:58:22 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I have updated the package with the suggested changes and the patch. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnurobots.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnurobots-1.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:01:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) Still not imported ! Is there a problem ? Yes: See the fixme at the top of the spec file. While the complete package is GPLv2+, some of the included demo and tutorial projects might not. Some of them are taken from the LSP (http://lmms.sourceforge.net/lsp.php), with various licenses, and those that are not, are under a CC license (according to upstream, but upstream couldn't tell me (yet) which one). I didn't find enough time to sort that out, that's why I delayed the import. If that issue can be postponed, I can do the import real soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:03:08 EDT --- Ok, so I ask for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #7 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:02:32 EDT --- I attempted to install it on the latest sugar build, and I am getting the following error: Fatal Python error: (pygame parachute) Segmentation Fault Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sugar-activity, line 21, in module main.main() File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py, line 103, in main module = __import__(module_name) File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/activity.py, line 1, in module import olpcgames File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/__init__.py, line 37, in module from olpcgames import camera File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/camera.py, line 12, in module import gst File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gst-0.10/gst/__init__.py, line 170, in module from _gst import * RuntimeError: can't initialize module gst: Error re-scanning registry , child terminated by signal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:19:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kopete-cryptography Short Description: Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP Owners: jreznik kkofler than rdieter ltinkl Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668 manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:25:51 EDT --- for info,last version is here: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/10/SRPMS/libkate-0.2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm It still seems in development stage. But ABI seems stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:34:44 EDT --- I don't know; I'm not going to pretend that I've understood what comment #14 means, and I haven't seen an explicit comment from the submitter of this ticket directly answering the issue I raised in the initial review regarding whether or not the -devel package ends up being required at runtime. All I got was Beats me and then several comments regarding DT_SONAME which I might research more deeply if I didn't have 30 other review tickets in flight at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #11 from Vitezslav Crhonek [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 04:56:54 EDT --- I think so. I removed all auto-tools related things form spec file finally, they were not needed. Yes, I do own them too - and I'll be glad if you take a look, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412
--- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 04:05:22
EDT ---
Till thank you for this great review!
- libs - ok
- rpmlint warnings - ok but we (KDE SIG) should look to bug #474057
- mkdir %{buildroot} removed
So now the last problem is receiving encrypted messages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||473814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 04:59:46 EDT --- Thanks, they were the commands I couldn't find late last night. Third time lucky I think. Spec in same location. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libiphone-0.1.0-3.20081201git8c3a01e.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:49:39 EDT --- This looks good to me. It would be good to ask upstream directly about the license issue, but this software seems to be pretty old so I don't know if you would get much of a response. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474036] Review Request: terminator - Store and run multiple GNOME terminals in one window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474036 Sven Lankes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 08:06:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Thank you for your review, I will comment on your objections below. The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license... - NOK, see below Well, GPLv2+ is a Fedora approved license, so I see no violation on this point. I guess your objection is not about that the the tag I used is not approved, but that it is the wrong one. Which is really your next point. So I will comment further below. The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - The License tag is set to GPLv2+, but the actual source license is GPLv2. This is true both for the LICENSE file and at least some copyright notices. I based the tag I used on the text in the included LICENSE.txt file which says: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. I.e. this is GPLv2+. But as you pointed out all the copyright notices in the source file comments say: Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (June, 1991) So there is an inconsistency between the LICENSE.txt file and the source file comments. Since the source file comments are more restrictive (GPLv2) than the LICENSE.txt file (GPLv2+) I have changed the label in the spec file to GPLv2. New versions are available here: Spec URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.09-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 10:56:49 EDT --- Good. ! Note: Currently on dist-f11 (rawhide) this package won't build due to bug in rpm (bug 473814). --- This package (gnurobots) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:04:30 EDT --- The above was from a rawhids build of sugar. Using a pure F10 build (f10, f10updates and f10-testing) I get 1228251405.415884 WARNING root: Activity directory lacks a MANIFEST file. Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sugar-activity, line 21, in module main.main() File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py, line 100, in main module = __import__(module_name) File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/activity.py, line 1, in module import olpcgames File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/__init__.py, line 38, in module from olpcgames import pangofont File /usr/share/sugar/activities/Maze.activity/olpcgames/pangofont.py, line 18, in module from olpcgames import _cairoimage ImportError: cannot import name _cairoimage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Patrick Monnerat [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Patrick Monnerat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:06:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: robodoc Short Description: Extract documentation from source code Owners: monnerat Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468155] Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:02:25 EDT --- Many thanks for the review, Lucian. Will apply your suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676
--- Comment #18 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02
11:15:21 EDT ---
Summary: Script perms, macro, Source URL, remove generated user, own
%{_datadir}/partimaged.
1) I changed the script perms in the .src.rpm to 644 and in the rpm
to 744.
2) Removed home macro.
3) Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
4) Deleted created user in the postun section.
5) %dir %{_datadir}/partimaged
Spec: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/partimage.spec
SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/partimage-0.6.7-5.fc8.src.rpm
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:16:34 EDT --- Ugh, this package fails in %install: + install -m 0644 -p lib/linux/libKNIBase.a lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.a lib/linux/libKNI_LM.a /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libkni-3.9.2-7.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64 + install -p 'lib/linux/*.so.*' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libkni-3.9.2-7.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64 install: cannot stat `lib/linux/*.so.*': No such file or directory I checked the buid directory and only see .a files in there. Also, I still see several incidences of [failed] in the build log: Compiling: cdlSocket.o [failed] cdlSocket.cpp: In constructor 'CCdlSocket::CCdlSocket(char*, int)': cdlSocket.cpp:99: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' cdlSocket.cpp:110: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' cdlSocket.cpp:116: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' Compiling: kmlExt.o [failed] kmlExt.cpp: In member function 'void CKatana::create(KNI::kmlFactory*, CCplBase*)': kmlExt.cpp:149: error: 'runtime_exception' is not a member of 'std' mock.Root.build: Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNIBase.a [failed] a - cdlCOM.o a - cplSerial.o libKNIBase.a ar: cdlSocket.o: No such file or directory Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNIBase.so.3.9.0 [failed] g++: cdlSocket.o: No such file or directory g++: kmlExt.o: No such file or directory Building: ../../lib/linux/libKNI_InvKin.so.3.9.0 [failed] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lKNIBase collect2: ld returned 1 exit status And many others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173
--- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:31:05 EDT
---
The -devel package does not end up being required at runtime. The .so required
at runtime is the one in %{_libdir} and the above comments agree.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461003] Review Request: ssbd - Voice keyer for use in hamradio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461003 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:46:22 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ssbd Short Description: Voice keyer for use in hamradio Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #17 from François Kooman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:51:50 EDT --- FAS name: fkooman I requested sponsoring. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:53:21 EDT --- * Licensing - I guess src/examples/Clock.java is non-free. So if this file is not needed, please remove this file (and also .jar/.dll files) and repackage the zip source: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code * Then the license tag must be ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and zlib. --- LICENSE: ASL 1.1 LICENSE_nanoxml: zlib src/com/l2fprod/gui/plaf/skin/LafPluginSupport.java ASL 2.0 src/com/l2fprod/util/WeakImageIcon.java ASL 2.0 src/examples/Clock.java ??? --- * Also, add LICENSE_nanoxml to %doc. - If src/examples/Clock.java is needed, I wil ask spot whether the license is free or not. * BuildRequires, Requires - For java depedency, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires If this package needs Java openjdk, the BuildRequires should have BuildRequires: java-devel = 1:1.6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 11:58:09 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 12:38:53 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||474188 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474188] Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||473476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474188] New: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474188 Summary: Review Request: python-openoffice - Python libraries for interacting with OpenOffice.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-openoffice.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/python-openoffice-0.1-0.1.20080929svn33.fc11.src.rpm Description: The library is designed to supports both writing Macros called by OOo) and interacting with OOo from an external Python program (using the UNO bridge). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473476] Review Request: trytond - Server for the Tryton application framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473476 --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 12:58:56 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tryton/trytond-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Tue Dec 2 2008 Dan Horák dan[at]danny.cz 1.0.1-2 - add dependency on python-openoffice Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:11:24 EDT --- Oh, might also want to add partimage- to the man.tar.gz and create_certificates.sh and rename at install, to avoid SRPM clobber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:07:53 EDT --- Excellent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:09:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: afuse Short Description: An automounter implemented with FUSE Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474193] New: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 Summary: Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/~ivaxer/glog-0.1.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: Google glog is a library that implements application-level logging. This library provides logging APIs based on C++-style streams and various helper macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #21 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:41:24 EDT --- You mean, putting Source1, Source3, Source4, Source5, in, say, scripts.tar.gz and uncompressing them in the source tree? I was intending to do that, but during the review, it would have complicated the access to the scripts. I also have this small text with the guidelines I use for cloning my installations. Even for laptops, I always use a pre-created image. Maybe you would like to read it (of course, this text cannot be included in the rpm). http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/roma/LCG_partimage.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 Summary|Review Request: nufw - |Review Request: nufw - |Authentication Firewall |Authentication Firewall |Suite for Linux - |Suite for Linux |FE-NEEDSPONSOR | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:51:28 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lzip-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:53:15 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afuse-0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472542] Review Request: afuse - An automounter implemented with FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472542 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:53:12 EDT --- afuse-0.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/afuse-0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473180] Review Request: lzip - LZMA compressor with integrity checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473180 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 13:51:32 EDT --- lzip-1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lzip-1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473590] Review Request: libiphone - A library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473590 Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 14:04:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libiphone Short Description: Library for connecting to Apple iPhone and iPod touch Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 14:08:19 EDT --- No, simply rename man.tar.gz partimage-man.tar.gz and rename create_certificates.sh partimage-create_certificates.sh, and rename them when they are installed in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #23 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 14:35:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) No, simply rename man.tar.gz partimage-man.tar.gz and rename create_certificates.sh partimage-create_certificates.sh, and rename them when they are installed in the spec. I did what you asked, but I also compressed the scripts in partimage-scripts.tar.gz Same links. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 14:44:43 EDT --- No need, but no harm either. Looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #47 from Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 14:50:29 EDT --- I've committed and built ivtv-utils 1.3.0 for rawhide, working on F10 and F9 now (going to leave out F8, not worth it at this point, I think, and not sure if the kernel is sufficiently new for the latest ivtv-utils or not). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 15:07:01 EDT --- I hope you realize that there are over 700 review requests in the queue, and that while they will all receive attention eventually, one week including a major US holiday is a bit of an ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 15:20:47 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 15:21:30 EDT --- ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ivtv-utils-1.3.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #19 from François Kooman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 15:21:33 EDT --- I used Koji scratch build, which runs perfectly on all platforms for F10, but on Rawhide it breaks (because of libtool-2.2). I don't run rawhide here yet. I'll try to fix this libtool issue if I can find what needs changing... dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971571 dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=971550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 15:37:37 EDT --- Thanks a lot, Jon. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: partimage Short Description: Partition imaging utility, much like Ghost Owners: roma Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 16:24:40 EDT --- As guessed: $ grep soname build.libzdb.10.log gcc -shared [...] -Wl,-soname -Wl,libzdb-2.2.3.so.4 -o .libs/libzdb-2.2.3.so.4.1.2 $ objdump -x libzdb-2.2.3.so.4.1.2 |grep -i son SONAME libzdb-2.2.3.so.4 This is the internal library name an application will link with. The dynamic loader/linker will use this name when searching for the library file. And rpmbuild constructs automatic dependencies on these names. Including the full software 2.2.3 version in it (instead of just the library versioning scheme at the very right) implies that every time the 2.2.3 version will change, the dependencies of all packages that require this library will be broken and will need a rebuild. [...] libzdb-devel stores its header files directly in /usr/include. Due to file names like URL.h, Connection.h and Exception.h, this is typical pollution of the global namespace and must be avoided. Please install into /usr/include/libzdb/ instead. [...] Package Summary can start with Small, fast, ... instead of A [...] You can build with --disable-static to skip building the static lib. [...] The licencing stuff covered in file EXCEPTIONS seems okay. I'm not a lawyer, though, so Fedora Legal and/or a second pair of eyes would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395
Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 16:38:03 EDT
---
imho this is one of the most complicated mingw32 spec file. is this really that
bad or it was just written too long ago?
a few comments:
do we build and run the tests or not? it seems to me not, but the BR
wine is still there. ie not %if %{with_tests}
is there any reason for this line?:
%{SOURCE1} /dev/null
neither mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-configure.patch nor the inline gcc script
has the -mms-bitfields set. anyway it'd be better to everywhere use the
%_mingw32_cflags not the hard coded ones. anyway is it a good trick to
use the inline gcc script?
wouldn't be better to use everywhere the %_mingw32_make macro (but i
don't see whether is has any effect?
this comment in the sepc:
Disable this thread test, because we don't have pthread on Windows
still valid when we have mingw32-pthreads?
unfortunately it's makefiles and configure scripts are very hard coded
so we can't easily fix ar, ranlib etc. just patch the makefiles:-(
imho the best way in this case to run a successful build and look trough
the buildlog to find where and which commands are used.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389
Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 16:36:50 EDT
---
replace %{crazy_version} with
`echo %{version}|tr . -`
it's much easier to see in place and don't have to change when the version
change (although it's not changed for years)
in the build section put the clean after the first build:
make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GC-inlined
make clean
make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GCE-inlined
afais GCE-inlined has different defines so probably a clean would be
useful before the next target.
add -mms-bitfields or even better %_mingw32_cflags to OPT probably only
way to do this is a patch for the makefile.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472685] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Component-InstancePerContext - Return a new instance a component on each request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472685 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474244] New: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values Alias: mysqlreport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 Summary: Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://hackmysql.com/mysqlreport OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/mysqlreport.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/mysqlreport-3.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: mysqlreport makes a friendly report of important MySQL status values. It transforms the values from SHOW STATUS into an easy-to-read report that provides an in-depth understanding of how well MySQL is running, and is a better alternative (and practically the only alternative) to manually interpreting SHOW STATUS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474244] Review Request: mysqlreport - A friendly report of important MySQL status values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474244 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 17:43:54 EDT --- dist-f11 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=972151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #22 from David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 17:44:31 EDT --- Updated versions: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8.1-0.6/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8.1-0.6/arm4-0.8.1-0.6.fc9.src.rpm Based on the 0.8.1 release which removed all code related to the SDK. Unfortunately this includes the test programs, so those packages have been removed as well. Also, as per Stefan's suggestion, all static libraries have been removed. Passed all the usual build tests with the same rpmlint warnings as before. 6th time's the charm? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:20:33 EDT --- OK, in that case I think this is fine. It would still be good to include that email from upstream with the license information as documentation, but you can do that at your leisure. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:25:14 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:24:27 EDT --- Is there any reason this hasn't been pushed out yet? I only see it in rawhide, with an update for f9 in testing (and nothing for f10). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:26:12 EDT --- Any reason this hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:30:39 EDT --- Is there any chance of closing this now, nine months after the review has been completed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:29:24 EDT --- Any reason for this to still be open? Usually bodhi closes the tickets automatically when it pushes the new packages to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457839] Review Request: rubygem-cobbler - Provides Ruby bindings to interact with a Cobbler server.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:31:37 EDT --- Any reason this ticket is stil open, given that the package is already in the relevant stable Fedora branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 447191] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447191 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:28:28 EDT --- *** Bug 469833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:28:28 EDT --- I guess this should have been closed DUPLICATE initially, so I'll do that now. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447191 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:33:31 EDT --- I guess a new package is needed now that we have functional guidelines. The above links seem to be broken in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470173] Review Request: m4ri - Linear Algebra over F_2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470173 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:32:18 EDT --- I'll include the email before import. Thanks very much for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: m4ri Short Description: Linear Algebra over F_2 Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469833] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - Use the GMP library for Math::BigInt routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469833 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:37:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Steve, can you do a build of perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for F-9 as I need it for perl-Crypt-DSA perl-Crypt-DH? I haven't seen any activity from Steve since mid-August or so; if you have superwizbangpackager membership (unsure of the exact name right now grin) I'd suggest filing a bug against it, then just submitting an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:37:08 EDT --- Perhaps I unchecked the close bug box when I created the updates. No need to keep this open any longer now as you say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 18:38:43 EDT --- * Tue Dec 2 2008 Paul Wouters [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0.2.0-3 - Use upstream svn patch for multiple resolvers and defaults - Don't override unused libdir - Cleanup and run autoreconf - Added missing dependancies (anacron, automake, libtool) - Fix permission on cron job. I Added a require for anacron (but is that right? shouldnt it be any cron daemon?) Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/autotrust/autotrust-0.2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 19:43:10 EDT --- The shared-lib-calls-exit bits are just pointing out an oddity in the API of the library; generally the caller would want to handle errors itself instead of simply having the library exit, but I suspect that most of these libraries are for internal use anyway. If anything, they'd be something to report upstream; they're not blockers. The unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints are valid, but not really significant. I don't see any libraries there that wouldn't be pulled in by qt itself, so there's not really any inefficiency. The static libraries will need to go in their own -static packages; they are not permitted in the -devel packages alongside shared libraries. Preferably they aren't included at all, but that's up to you. Many (all?) of the *so files are duplicated between the base and -devel packages. It looks like you used the usual pattern for capturing just the versioned .so files, but this package uses some odd library versioning so for some reason the library version appears before the .so as well as after it on some files. I don't pretend to understand why, but I guess you'll need to change the patterns used for capturing the versioned and unversioned .so files. The COPYRIGHT file mentions a gsm directory with a different copyright, but I don't see it in the package. I guess the package now just uses an external library. I don't see any licensing information on the sounds. Can you verify the license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:10:55 EDT --- projectM-pulseaudio-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:10:26 EDT --- projectM-jack-1.2.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:09:49 EDT --- libev-3.48-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:13:54 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460352] Review Request: xwota - Who's On the Air Database interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460352 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:12:27 EDT --- xwota-0.4-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:13:24 EDT --- python-suds-0.3.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:18:26 EDT --- log4cxx-0.10.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 20:20:42 EDT --- sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-memorize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
