[Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 02:56:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Thanks. But since there's a binary incompatibility between the versions of suitesparse, we need to block the suitesparse update request bug. Right. Thanks for filing that bug on suitesparse and adding it as blocking this bug. * The directory /usr/share/doc/python-cvxopt-1.1/html is empty. Those latex files are not built properly. I'm fixing this now by forcing the rebuild (make -B). * You need to put an explicit Requires on python-matplotlib since some of the examples will need this library. I created an examples subpackage and had the -examples package require python-matplotlib. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #16 from Mattias Ellert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 04:07:20 EDT --- I have updated the package due to a compatibility issue with older versions of automake. SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/gpt-3.2-12.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/gpt.spec The new additional patch is reported to upstream bugzilla: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242
manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 04:32:41
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: b66764af72e14918367207b70d3097a868da74d8
Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-40.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build + devel/x86_64
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the tests pass.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
*** APPROVED ***
Note: leaving as only comment in %changelog the bits left by an automatic
script, even after you review and modify the spec is a tiny bit misleading...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 04:47:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer Short Description: Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #5 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 05:08:09 EDT --- Hi, you can find the new spec and srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:31:11 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:32:18 EDT --- sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:33:37 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:31:50 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:36:12 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474737] Review Request: irclog2html - Script to convert IRC logs to HTML and other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474737 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:38:35 EDT --- irclog2html-2.7-2.svn67.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:39:20 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:38:02 EDT --- supybot-fedora-0.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474744] Review Request: supybot-fedora - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Fedora services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474744 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475471] Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475471] New: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475471 Summary: Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The POI project is the master project for developing pure Java ports of file formats based on Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document Format. OLE 2 Compound Document Format is used by Microsoft Office Documents, as well as by programs using MFC property sets to serialize their document objects. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||K Desktop Environment ||177302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473926] Review Request: mod_limitipconn - Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473926 Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 07:02:54 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review, Dan! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mod_limitipconn Short Description: Simultaneous connection limiting module for Apache Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #2 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 05:25:18 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for the review, i have fixed all that you said. You can find new version at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.06-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:57:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) How did you determine that the certs are public domain? By looking at the ca-certificates package, in which cacert.org would like to ultimately include their root certificate. But indeed, I was wrong. I've updated the package to include a NRP-DaL.txt file where I copied the content of the website's Disclaimer and Licence page. I don't know if this is suitable for Fedora or not, so I've sent an email to the legal-list to ask about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473412] Review Request: kopete-cryptography - Encrypts and signs messages in Kopete using the OpenPGP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473412 --- Comment #21 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 07:22:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) I noticed that you addeed ldconfig in %post(un), but why? Afaik it is not needed here, because ldconfig does not work on the directory, where kopete-cryptogryphy stores the .so file, i.e. this does not return anything: ldconfig -v | grep kopete_cryptography I tested this on F10, but I doubt, that this is different for Rawhide. Ok, sorry I didn't realize what I'm doing, shortage :) Finally I have patches for both Kopete and Kopete Cryptography plugin, only need some more polishing and upstream attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474746] Review Request: supybot-koji - Plugin for Supybot to interact with Koji instances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474746 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:38:50 EDT --- supybot-koji-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 08:35:40 EDT --- Ver. 0.4 is out! http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Dropped all workarounds, mentioned above. Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225836] Merge Review: gnome-speech
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225836 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 05:50:27 EDT --- Ping? Are these issues I pointed out addressed? There have been 9 releases of gnome-speech after I submitted my notes, but all the problems are still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474965] Review Request: php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA - Driver based class to calculate holidays in USA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474965 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:39:11 EDT --- php-pear-Date-Holidays-USA-0.1.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470694] Review Request: rubygem-rack - Common API for connecting web frameworks, web servers and layers of software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470694 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 06:37:45 EDT --- rubygem-rack-0.4.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 09:22:44 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 09:30:57 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 09:34:21 EDT --- Why this package still not imported and built? Seems that someone forget about something :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #21 from Gerd Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 09:39:26 EDT --- New version uploaded: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object.spec http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object-1.26-3.fc10.src.rpm I didn't start from scratch but took an existing package, thats why I didn't generate a specfile. To me it looks like it was created by an older cpanspec version. Picked up some stuff from a fresh generated file version, so it is closer now. Seems rpmlint got smarter wrt. dist tag, a while back it used to complain about changelog entries without dist tag. Fixed it up. Also added a %check section (+buildrequires needed for that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 10:35:31 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions -- I've incorporated them into a new version of the package: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/pdfbook/pdfbook-0-2.20070930.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475508] New: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Summary: Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/javassist-3.9.0-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Javassist enables Java programs to define a new class at runtime and to modify a class file when the JVM loads it. Unlike other similar bytecode editors, Javassist provides two levels of API: source level and bytecode level. If the users use the source-level API, they can edit a class file without knowledge of the specifications of the Java bytecode. The whole API is designed with only the vocabulary of the Java language. You can even specify inserted bytecode in the form of source text; Javassist compiles it on the fly. On the other hand, the bytecode-level API allows the users to directly edit a class file as other editors. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:25:43 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-4.20081104cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:25:09 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:24:46 EDT --- Small update to include the dist in the version http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:36:15 EDT --- Updated to use the latest greatest BuildRoot and to include dist in the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/fontbox-0.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:35:42 EDT --- Fixed (hopefully!) -- I also added the dist to the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:36:56 EDT --- Updated with a better BuildRoot and with dist in the version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jempbox-0.2.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474843] Review Request: pdfbook - Rearrange pages in a PDF file into signatures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474843 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:41:20 EDT --- NB: I just replaced the above spec and SRPM with one that uses the latest greatest BuildRoot specification too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:39:45 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong above. Note that I've also changed to use the latest greatest BuildRoot: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/cglib-2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472793] Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:37:51 EDT --- Changed buildroot, added dist to version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/jgraph-5.12.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472794] Review Request: onemind-commons-java - A common library used to support other onemind libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472794 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:37:26 EDT --- Changed buildroot, added dist to version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/onemind-commons-java-1.5.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:38:45 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong in the previous message. Note that I've also changed to used the latest greatest BuildRoot. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/ktable-2.1.3-4.20081104cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469896] Review Request: nachocalendar - A flexible Calendar component for the Java platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469896 --- Comment #4 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:39:20 EDT --- Oops, the URL was wrong above. Note that I've also changed to use the latest greatest BuildRoot: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/java-libraries/nachocalendar-0.23-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451153] Review Request: mapbender - Geospatial portal for OGC OWS architectures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451153 --- Comment #4 from Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:47:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapbender-2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Re-Updated to latest upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Felix Kaechele [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Felix Kaechele [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:47:51 EDT --- APPROVED. You can now go ahead and request a CVS module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:54:34 EDT --- Everything seems good. Now we'll have to wait for suitesparse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Bug 454414 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 12:00:07 EDT --- Built in F-10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-binutils-2.18.50_20080109_2-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Bug 454410 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Bug 454412 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Bug 454416 depends on bug 454408, which changed state. Bug 454408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 11:57:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: swingx Short Description: A collection of Swing components Owners: mef Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 --- Comment #6 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:16:27 EDT --- This has happened by the way. We've gone with the Old MIT license which doesn't have any advertising requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475593] New: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to create font packages. This package will serve as base for fonts packaging starting with Fedora 11 It has been approved by FPC today (2008-12-09). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_%282008-11-18%29 (18:51:15) Rathann: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:17) ubertibbs: It makes the packages reasonable instead of having 50 lines of identical shell code pasted into them. (18:51:21) spot: +1 from me (18:51:24) hansg: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:28) ubertibbs: +1 from me. (18:51:37) racor: -1 from me (18:51:52) rdieter: +1 (there's good and bad uses of macros, this is an example of the good kind, imo) (18:52:00) ubertibbs: racor: If you want the reference where we asked the Java folks to add the macros, I will dig it out for you. (18:52:02) spot: abadger1999: would you like to vote? (18:52:10) abadger1999: +1 (18:52:21) spot: okay, thats 6 for and 1 against, it passes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 (minutes not posted yet) There is currently no hosting source for this project, a demand will be made fedorahosted side but that's no reason not to push the package in rawhide now so packagers can start adapting their packages to the new template(s) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:30:41 EDT --- FedoraHosted request http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474193] Review Request: glog - A C++ application logging library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474193 --- Comment #5 from John A. Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:33:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: glog Short Description: A C++ application logging library Owners: ivaxer Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471108] Review Request: wholeslide - a library for decoding virtual slide files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471108 Adam Goode [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:40:51 EDT --- Withdrawing this package for now, as there are some changes upstream, and the project is being renamed to OpenSlide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:40:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nxtvepg Short Description: A nexTView EPG decoder and browser Owners: trausche Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475603] New: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475603 Summary: Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jFormatString/jFormatString.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jFormatString/jFormatString-0-0.1.20081016svn.src.rpm Description: This project is derived from Sun's implementation of java.util.Formatter. It is designed to allow compile time checks as to whether or not a use of a format string will be erroneous when executed at runtime. This package is required by findbugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 Jerry James [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||475603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475603] Review Request: jFormatString - Java format string compile-time checker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475603 Jerry James [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||464014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 14:18:09 EDT --- FYI - got this mail from upstream, will wait for new release. I assume there are no problems with a dual license? I think I originally wrote it under GPL and then had to change it to MIT when I published a few articles about it. So in good conscience, I suppose I should dual license it. I think I will create a new Google Code project and load the files up there, and then generate a 1.1 version of the software. I'll notify you as soon as I have done that. Will that work alright? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #7 from John Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 14:26:04 EDT --- Adjusted the configure and removed autoconf, automake http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226033] Merge Review: libmng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226033 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 14:55:53 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225619] Merge Review: bluez-hcidump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 14:53:53 EDT --- Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS and closing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:06:05 EDT --- Any objection to my committing fixes to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Åge Olai Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |org)| --- Comment #28 from Åge Olai Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:13:16 EDT --- Hi! Thank you for your feedback on this package and approving it! I'm about to start on the process of rebuilding it for import. I've just requested sponsorship and my FAS-name is aageolai. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:12:56 EDT --- The license and the license field have long been fixed. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:19:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) I just got an email back from the jakarta-commons-cli maintainer, and he will be updating to 1.1 on Monday. Shouldn't BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-cli be amended to require = 1.1, too? Or is it OK to build with 1.0 as long as 1.1 is present at runtime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #14 from R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:21:26 EDT --- I see you have noted the license change in the .spec file. Is any other review, occasioned by a relicensing, required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472724] Review Request: xjparse - wrapper for the Xerces XML Schema validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472724
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008-12-09 15:30:22 EDT ---
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/xjparse
The %attr is redundant here, you're already installing this script with install
-pm755. You can fix it while importing the package, which is now APPROVED.
Please apply for sponsorship into packager group in the Fedora Accounts System
so that I can sponsor you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225626] Merge Review: brltty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:29:32 EDT --- Adding current maintainer. Local build of 3-10.1 on F-10 fails: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/brltty-3.10-1.fc10.i386 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/META /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/libbrlapi_stubs.a /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so.owner RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/META /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/brlapi.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/brlapi/libbrlapi_stubs.a /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllbrlapi_stubs.so.owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:32:12 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:31:44 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:45:45 EDT --- Reviewed current version. In addition to the above: mgetty.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.36-1 ['1.1.36-2.fc10', '1.1.36-2'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. Sounds link fuzz has been fixed, doing a mock build to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226161] Merge Review: mrtg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226161 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:51:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:57:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) I see you have noted the license change in the .spec file. Is any other review, occasioned by a relicensing, required? Actually, I forgot to note in my previous comment, that upstream relicensed project under LGPLv3 or any later version. Thanks for pointing on this. I don't think that some extra review required in that case. Ver. 0.4-2 %changelog * Tue Dec 9 2008 Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.4-2 - Changed summary. - Fixed license field. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226139] Merge Review: mgetty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226139 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:09:01 EDT --- Mock build, and thus fuzz and BuildRequires, are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:05:07 EDT --- The license was already fixed. * Tue Dec 09 2008 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.3.7-3 - Add full source URL to Source lines. - Add docs to main and devel package. - rpmlint is happy now. - Resolves: #225770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:16:22 EDT --- Reviewed 0.14.3-7, same as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:24:35 EDT --- package is not approved, and cant be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:24:14 EDT --- Ok, just post it here and I'll do another review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226229] Merge Review: pango
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226229 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:26:10 EDT --- package has not been reviewed and approved. you cant close it until review is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 --- Comment #17 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:31:42 EDT --- How should we proceed. rpmlint is happy about cairo. Someone can send a patch for the minor issues left? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848
--- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008-12-09 16:28:33 EDT ---
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result
jeuclid-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation
jeuclid-mathviewer.noarch: W: no-documentation
jeuclid-fop.noarch: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
jeuclid-mathviewer.desktop
...
Icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/jeuclid_48x48.png
Icon tag with just plain filename without extension is preferred, but the above
is perfectly acceptable as well.
...
Categories=Graphics;Math;Science
Categories should be semicolon-terminated (;).
License:ASL 2.0 and SPL
Where did SPL come from?
%packagemathviewer
Summary:Viewer for MathML files
Group: Applications/Publishing
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
This is missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme, because you're putting the icon
in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* .
cp src/icons/jeuclid_48x48.png
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/
Please use cp -p to preserve the timestamp.
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-mathviewer
and
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/jeuclid-cli
%attr is redundant, you're already installing these scripts with install
-pm755.
You are missing %post/%postun scripts for updating GTK icon cache, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Bug 467395 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Bug 467402 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Bug 454414 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Bug 467401 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Bug 467407 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Bug 467409 depends on bug 454410, which changed state. Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
