[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 03:59:21 EDT --- unable to verify upstream source wget http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz --2008-12-10 14:26:41-- http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz Resolving www.cpan.org... 66.39.76.93 Connecting to www.cpan.org|66.39.76.93|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-12-10 14:26:42 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473727] Review Request: perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK - Gtk2::TreeView renderer for Data::TreeDumper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473727 Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:06:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988533 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a8ed69115c89247270b1210239a04f03 Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave nothing. + Package perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0.02-2.fc11 = Provides: perl(Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK) = 0.02 Requires: perl = 0:5.006 perl(AutoLoader) perl(Data::TreeDumper) perl(Exporter) perl(Glib) perl(Gtk2) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:13:00 EDT --- %changelog again - Every time you make changes in your spec file, you should bump the release and create a new entry in your changelog. Now it should be '2' ;-) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469471] Review Request: skinlf - Java look and feel for swing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469471 --- Comment #15 from D Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:43:59 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/skinlf-6.7-6.fc9.src.rpm Seems good, however as I wrote in my comment 10 (and as you wondered) since Clock.java must be removed from source zip file, the zip file must be re-packaged. Done. rpmlint output is empty for spec, SRPM and RPM. I set the permissions on the tarball generator to 644, so if you wish to use it, you have to set execute permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 --- Comment #19 from Bernie Innocenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:43:41 EDT --- For the record, I've built this on a F9 box and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:53:22 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469897] Review Request: swingx - A collection of powerful, useful, and just plain fun Swing components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469897 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 04:56:27 EDT --- swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swingx-0.9.4-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||ail.com) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 06:12:22 EDT --- The links to the spec/SRPM are not working, therefore nothing can be done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #25 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 06:18:44 EDT --- 1.4.5 is out now. Jens, do you also need to be sponsored? Otherwise you should remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR from the blocked bugs list. If you do not need to be sponsored, I will try to review this, soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #6 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:08:18 EDT --- Hi, * I update to the latest version * Add a patch to -avoid-version * Reintroduce python bindings You can find the new spec ans srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |om) | --- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 05:18:43 EDT --- Hi, Sorry for the delay. Here are the updated spec and source rpms. Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:40:48 EDT --- Looks like a GUI application to me, therefore a .desktop file is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #36 from Torsten Rausche [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:44:31 EDT --- - Package builds done - Closing this ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||org) --- Comment #11 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:45:37 EDT --- There is a newer version of the package available, please update and notice comment:10 to get this reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:47:58 EDT --- I have tested it a few month ago (difficult for me as I only have a i386). I'll try to find someone to test it again soon :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475775] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475775 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-BDB - Truly asynchronous berkeley db access Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-BDB.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-BDB-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Truly asynchronous berkeley db access rpmlint is clean built using mock in rawhide-i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475777] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475777 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-AIO - Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-AnyEvent-AIO.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-AnyEvent-AIO-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Truly asynchronous file and directrory I/O rpmlint is clean built using mock on rawhide-i386 This package needs an updated perl(IO::AIO) (= 3 ) currently in updates-testing for F-10 (whereas it should works for F-9) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189662
Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
||ormatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
--- Comment #15 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:32:59 EDT ---
Issues at first sight:
- GPL is not a valid License shortname anymore
- SourceX files are not prefixed with %{name}: README.fedora, tconn
- The comment before the Version-tag does not apply anymore
- The patch should be commented with the explanation, that upstream is dead
- The correct SF.net Source0 URL is:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}-Beta.tar.gz
- It looks to me, that it contains libraries in %libdir, therefore these
scriptlets need to be run:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
If this is not needed, please explain why.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 06:52:58 EDT --- Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #27 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:00:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) Petersen-san is actually one of the sponsors. Ok, it seems to be safe to remove the FE_NEEDSPONSOR, then. I also noticed that Michel is already assigned to this, are you planning to review this, soon? Are there any plans to get this also into F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #5 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:09:48 EDT --- You can find new version at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/clamtk-4.06-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246349] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246349 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Comment #4 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:10:49 EDT --- see comment:3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||177841 Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||hoo.com) --- Comment #3 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:09:33 EDT --- According to the description, FE-NEEDSPONSOR neeeds to be blocked, which I just did. I mark this as NEEDINFO to show, that the review cannot proceed without action from the reporter (removing the mplayer dependency). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474535] Review Request: clamtk - Easy to use front-end for ClamAV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474535 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:08:51 EDT --- Hi, Done =) I update the changelog and bump to Release 2 Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:20:37 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:42:56 EDT --- Imho the Source0: line is too obfuscated. I have filed a ticket at Fedora's Infrastructure trac instance to make simpler URLs with macro usage possible: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1043 But this huge macro also makes spectool fail to download the Source0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:48:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) ... - I do not understand why the existing --disable-mmx is not satisfactory; maybe he meant --disable-sse2 instead of --disable-sse. But it seems to me all of MLT's usage of MMX is not acceptable to Fedora i386 policy, and I know some of it is not yet compatible with x86-64. So, it seems to me --disable-mmx should be fine as a global option regardless of architecture of the build. We can build the library twice within one mlt.i386 package for i386. (that's done with the atlas package for an example) - one time with mmx sse sse2 disabled. - one other time with mmx sse sse2 enabled. The resulting optimized library will be moved in /usr/lib/sse2 and activated at runtime if the dynamic library loader has detected the running cpu is sse2 capable. For this feature to be enabled, we need to be sure nothing will hardcode the libraries pathes, and that it will be correctly linked (not dlopened for example). - I know nothing about multilibs. That's a packaging level problem. - Re: - Have runtime tests to be done. What exactly does that mean? MLT already attempts to dlopen all so in lib/mlt. That's really bad. We are in $prefix/lib64/mlt on x86_64 ppc64 sparc64 (aka multilibs systems, so not ia64). It would be easier to use libtool-ltdl, but i don't know how to add support for it easily with you current buildsys. Anyway, you should be able to tweak the dlopening path to be correct. Once that said, I'm not sure I can support one more split between mlt non-ffmpeg enabled and mlt-freeworld ffmpeg enabled. Is there any package using mlt that can be in Fedora once mlt is in ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 08:23:39 EDT --- nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nxtvepg-2.8.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475755] New: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Summary: Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo.spec SRPM URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/pkgs/devtodo-0.1.20-1.src.rpm Description: Todo is a program to display and manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding work, or just reminders. The program itself is assisted by a few shell scripts that override default builtins. Specifically, cd, pushd and popd are overridden so that when using one of these commands to enter a directory, the todo will display any outstanding items in that directory. For much more complete information please refer to the man page (devtodo(1)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226301] Merge Review: planner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:02:02 EDT --- Re-adding planner maintainer. Caolan, please do not remove yourself from this review again without adding a planner co-maintainer that has agreed to work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473972] Review Request: nufw - Authentication Firewall Suite for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473972 --- Comment #7 from Jerome Soyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 07:35:25 EDT --- Hi, * I update to the latest version * Add a patch to -avoid-version * Reintroduce python bindings You can find the new spec ans srpms file on : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw-2.2.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/nufw.spec Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:07:54 EDT --- The package needs a maintainer and you need a sponsor to maintain the package. Did you close the bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Adam Tkac [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:07:04 EDT --- SRPM and SPEC links seem incorrect. Could you please update them? I will take care about review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226367] Merge Review: reiserfs-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226367 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:10:34 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226426] Merge Review: spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226426 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:11:13 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Adam Tkac [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||) --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:08:01 EDT --- SRPM and SPEC links seem incorrect. Could you please update them? I will take care about review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:32:13 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/svxlink-080730-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:32:56 EDT --- svxlink-080730-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/svxlink-080730-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459637] Review Request: svxlink - Repeater controller and EchoLink (simplex or repeater)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459637 Lucian Langa [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254
--- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Villani [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:41:45
EDT ---
SPEC URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=system/fedora-package-config-zypper/fedora-package-config-zypper.spec;hb=HEAD
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/fedora-package-config-zypper-10-1.fc10.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #3)
Just some quick comments on your spec file
- Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Done
- URL is not the upstream URL. Why not pack the file together and make a
proper release which is hosted on fedorahosted.org?
I put ZYpp url instead of fedoraproject.org, is that ok?
- doc is empty. Is it necessary?
Removed %doc
Zypper is not available for Fedora at the moment. Does it make sense to add
*.repo files without the tool to use them?
This review depends on the core zypp components, due to our recent move to rpm
4.6 upstream has to port it to that specific version before we can include it
in Fedora. It makes sense to me to have the review sitting around until they
fix the build issues.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:50:12 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Fernando Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 09:55:34 EDT --- Can you use cglib 2.1.3 instead? The 2.2 will conflict with things like Hibernate, JBoss AS etc. In the meanwhile, I am contacting the communities mentioned above to check if they could certify their software with a cglib 2.2 as well. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:05:25 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473775] Review Request: gpshell - Manage applets on GlobalPlatform and OpenPlatform smart cards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473775 Bug 473775 depends on bug 463266, which changed state. Bug 463266 Summary: Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:05:00 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:11:07 EDT --- Legal seems to think that the license is not appropriate for inclusion in Fedora. I'll ask on the CAcert support list now in case anyone there can give a clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475799] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:29:04 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:28:36 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? Currently can we regard that Pavel is the submitter? By the way: To Pavel Usually koji scratch build is deleted within about one week. If you are the current submitter would you upload your srpm on the different URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:34:03 EDT --- Henrique, any news from the upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:35:08 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:33:10 EDT --- This appears to be built in F10 and rawhide, closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:37:04 EDT --- Again, ping, anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475806] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475806 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172084853/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/172083449/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. It supports a wide range of audio players This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:38:34 EDT --- Oops, I now notice that cglib 2.1.3 is already in jpackage: http://www.jpackage.org/browser/rpm.php?jppversion=5.0id=5420 What's the procedure for importing that into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 246349] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Pugs - Perl 6 Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246349 Steven Pritchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Comment #5 from Steven Pritchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:39:24 EDT --- There's been new pugs development recently. I'll try to update my package ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 10:50:22 EDT --- I'm reviewing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 and had offered to sponsor. And he's unresponsive there too since October. I say we close both. Mamoru, thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:01:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xloadimage Short Description: Image viewer and processor Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:02:49 EDT --- Yes, I did close the request. I briefer contributing code and I don't have the time/desire to woo a sponsor. I'm just going to maintain the package externally. http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/wiki/Packages Sorry for wasting your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |) | --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:17:39 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. Here are the correct URLs for this package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/zlib/mingw32-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-10.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |) | --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:18:38 EDT --- Here are the correct URLs for this package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libjpeg/mingw32-libjpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libjpeg-6b-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:25:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pixman/mingw32-pixman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.12.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:23:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/portablexdr/mingw32-portablexdr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-portablexdr-4.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:24:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/termcap/mingw32-termcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:27:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pdcurses/mingw32-pdcurses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:22:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/bzip2/mingw32-bzip2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:23:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/iconv/mingw32-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-iconv-1.12-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:29:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gdbm/mingw32-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:28:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pthreads/mingw32-pthreads.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:30:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/openssl/mingw32-openssl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:28:18 EDT --- In reply to comment 1, see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2008-December/000211.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:30:02 EDT --- In reply to comment 1 please see: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2008-December/000210.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:31:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/freetype/mingw32-freetype.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-freetype-2.3.7-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:31:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libpng/mingw32-libpng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libpng-1.2.31-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:35:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libgpg-error/mingw32-libgpg-error.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:33:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/readline/mingw32-readline.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-readline-5.2-4.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Nov 22 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.2-4 - Rename *.dll.a to lib*.dll.a so that libtool can use these libraries. * Wed Nov 19 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.2-3 - Fix paths to mandir, infodir. * Fri Oct 31 2008 Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 5.2-2 - Rebuild against latest termcap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805
Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:35:25 EDT ---
- The tools execves to gpg, therefore a Requires: gpg should be added
- The package contains a testsuite, please add this to the spec to run it:
%check
make tests
- Then you probably also need BuildRequires: gpg
- The package does not build on ppc(64):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=991182
The problem is, that you have to run make without a target on ppc(64). You can
do this by defining a helper macro, e.g.
%define make_target %{nil}
%ifarch x86_64
%define make_target amd64
%endif
%ifarch %{ix86}
%define make_target x86
%endif
make %{?_smp_mflags} %{make_target}
- Also note the added %{?_smp_mflags}, which seem to work fine here.
- Have you thought about patching Makefile.in at upstream to use your install
commands instead of cp? Then you can use make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
beginning with next upstreams release. I can probably help you with this, if
you need help.
- Maybe you should use Source0: instead of Source:, but it seems not to cause
any trouble. I believe I have read some changes about Patch:/Patch0: with the
new rpm, but I have to check this.
- The guidelines recommend a %defattr(-, root, root, -) instead of %defattr(-,
root, root, 0755), but I guess the latter is a better %defattr, but I have to
check this, too
I will try to make a complete review later.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:32:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gettext/mingw32-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gettext-0.17-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:34:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/glib2/mingw32-glib2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-glib2-2.18.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:36:48 EDT --- No need to wait more. I got confirmation from an FPC member. --- This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget --- Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:37:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/atk/mingw32-atk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.24.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:39:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/cairo/mingw32-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:37:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/jasper/mingw32-jasper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:38:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/fontconfig/mingw32-fontconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:36:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libxml2/mingw32-libxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:39:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gnutls/mingw32-gnutls.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gnutls-2.4.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:38:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/libgcrypt/mingw32-libgcrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Till Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:43:49 EDT --- I set NEEDINFO to indicate, that this package is not ready for review, yet. Please provide working links to Spec and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:45:31 EDT --- CPAN problem. http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CF/CFRANKS/Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007.tar.gz works latest version below http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Catalyst/ is 0.03006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:49:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/SDL/mingw32-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:47:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pango/mingw32-pango.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:48:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gtk-vnc/mingw32-gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.8-0.2.20081030hg.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:47:59 EDT --- Yes, this ticket is coming around to being closed, again, due to submitter inaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:49:53 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xloadimage-4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474611] Review Request: xloadimage - Image viewer and processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474611 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:49:51 EDT --- xloadimage-4.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xloadimage-4.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:48:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gtk2/mingw32-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk2-2.14.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||177841 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:54:29 EDT --- There is already an open review request for pidgin-musictracker. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 But it seems that the original reporter is no longer interested to maintain this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475107] Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475107 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 11:55:47 EDT --- *** Bug 475806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
