[Bug 452584] Review Request: mldonkey - Client for several P2P networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452584 Bernie Innocenti changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(r...@greysector.ne ||t) --- Comment #20 from Bernie Innocenti 2008-12-21 02:31:52 EDT --- Dominik, I think we're waiting for you to bless this new version of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 Jan ONDREJ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ondr...@salstar.sk --- Comment #12 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-12-21 02:25:16 EDT --- Please, fix URL tag in package. There is an typo in current URL tag and this URL does not work. Thank you. URL: http://www.gnome.org/parojects/hotssh ^ remove "a" here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 01:34:17 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 01:35:41 EDT --- hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hydrogen-drumkits-0.9.3-1.20080907.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #17 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-21 00:02:41 EDT --- yeah. http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm-2.1.9-4.el5.src.rpm http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/obm/obm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234831] Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-21 00:00:39 EDT --- Yep. That looks good to me from what I can see. I would of course still push to rawhide and confirm it obsoletes as you expect before pushing for f10/f9. So, would you like to just put all the requests here and I can do them at once? Once the new packages are setup, you can dead.package the old ones. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:45:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:43:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:42:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473452] Review Request: system-config-services-docs - Documentation for configuring system services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473452 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:40:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473406] Review Request: system-config-users-docs - Documentation for administering users and groups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:37:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473413] Review Request: system-config-samba-docs - Documentation for configuring a Samba server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:39:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476633] Review Request: perl-Devel-CheckOS - Check what OS we're running on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:41:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473235] Review Request: system-config-date-docs - Documentation for setting the system date and time
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473235 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:36:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:33:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473318] Review Request: system-config-nfs-docs - Documentation for configuring an NFS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473318 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:34:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477221] Review Request: qzion - QZion is an canvas abstraction used by and made for QEdje
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477221 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:28:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:27:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477223] Review Request: qedje - A library combining the benefits of Edje and Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:29:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for character set conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:25:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:26:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:21:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477122] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-Roles - Role based authorization for Catalyst based on Catalyst::Plugin::Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477122 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:19:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476952] Review Request: hyphen-bg - Bulgarian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476952 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:18:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:21:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453839] Review Request: phatch - photo batch processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:16:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for "simple" tcp based protocols such as http or smtp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:07:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:09:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476926] Review Request: tcl-tclxml - XML parsing utilities for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476926 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:10:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:04:45 EDT --- much better! ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:06:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 23:00:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Xavier Lamien changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 23:00:14 EDT --- ha! thanks Kevin. New Package Request = Name: gnome-applet-grandr Short Description: GNOME panel applet for XrandR Owners: laxathom Branch: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:53:26 EDT --- That description doesn't look right... Can you check it and reset the cvs flag when you are ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:56:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470913] Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470913 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-20 22:51:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Xavier Lamien changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 22:27:24 EDT --- Well, Everything looks good. Kbuild flags are properly set and built on all expected arches. According to packaging guideline, this package can be added. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 Xavier Lamien changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Xavier Lamien 2008-12-20 22:18:17 EDT --- New Package Request = Name: gnome-applet-grandr Short Description: Gnome interface to Subversion Owners: laxathom Branch: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-20 20:37:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > can't you > guys do that ? I don't know. > Is there anything else i could do ? I recommend that this package should be moved to rpmfusion if mplayer dependency cannot be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||slony -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 19:09:13
EDT ---
Oh, that's really strange. What happens here, as far as I can tell
is the .../101/... in the URI is significant. The purported filename
doesn't matter:
wget --no-check-certificate
'https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/101/furbie'
==> furbie size 99353, same as ocaml-pa-do 0.8
wget --no-check-certificate
'https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/102/fooble'
==> fooble size 102485, same as ocaml-pa-do 0.8.1
What I did was to just update the %{version} tag without bumping
this implicit "release number" in the Source URL.
The following SRPM should fix this, by correcting the source URL:
Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 18:26:26 EDT --- The tarball in this package doesn't match the one I get from https://forge.ocamlcore.org/frs/download.php/101/pa_do-0.8.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||orcanba...@yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-12-20 17:42:35 EDT --- I think it would be better to use the pre-release notation (see kismet in [1]). By the way, your SRPM link is broken. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-20 17:36:14 EDT --- Yeah, right. I don't think so; I removed the exec bit for now. Rpmlint output is now clean. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/latex2rtf-1.9.19-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 17:27:41 EDT --- I do understand that it's a config file; the problem is that it's executable. Is there some reason that someone might ever want to execute it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461106] Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461106 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 17:19:49 EDT --- Sorry nobody's looked at this in a while, but I just tried to build on current rawhide (x86_64) and got: notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::class_init_function(void*, void*)': notification.cc:192: error: invalid conversion from 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*, gint)' to 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*)' notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::closed_callback(NotifyNotification*, gint)': notification.cc:238: error: too many arguments to function notification.cc: In member function 'virtual void Notify::Notification::on_closed(gint)': notification.cc:501: error: too many arguments to function It does build fine on F-10, though, and there's no requirement for a package to build on rawhide in order to be reviewed, although of course you'll want to get it building relatively soon. There are a pile of rpmlint unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints, against things like libgtk-x11 and libatk. I don't think these are especially problematic as those libraries will be in memory anyway, but they're trivially fixed with the usual one-liner: sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool after the %configure call. With that, rpmlint is silent. Note that the examples are GPL, not LGPL, but they aren't installed so there's no issue. Really I don't see anything which should block approval of this package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: fea7f6f7e436d343a14ceed749b5e9ad78e34c0a62c7790520710de5236c402f libnotifymm-0.6.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F-10, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. O rpmlint has some fixable complaints which aren't blockers. * final provides and requires are sane: libnotifymm-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libnotifymm-devel-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libnotifymm-1.0) = 0.6.1 libnotifymm-devel = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-devel(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = gtkmm24-devel libnotify-devel libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) pkgconfig * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig are in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is present. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-20 17:10:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Were you going to address those rpmlint complaints? > > The first does seem to be bogus, the second should be fixed, shouldn't it? I > mean, it's nice that you post the rpmlint output, but that only means that you > know there are issues to be addressed, and I'd have to bring them up at review > anyway. No, I'm not going to address them: the second one is bogus, too, since it's a config file, not a script that causes the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 16:13:10 EDT --- Any update? It's been over a month since the last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #17 from Tomas 2008-12-20 15:40:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > That makes a pretty good case that the bulkquery and demo plugins should not > be > packaged where they are. You missed test plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks||182235 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 15:36:15 EDT --- Indeed, builds fine and rpmlint is silent. However, this package is GPLv2 (only) and it needs libpcap which is BSD with advertising. I don't believe this is permitted, but then snort does it so I'm a bit confused. Blocking the legal tracker so someone who knows can check. The compiler flags are not correct. They do include -g, though, so the debuginfo package comes out OK. I'm concerned that /usr/bin/genkeys is a bit generic. It conflicts with at least some installs of ntp, although not Fedora's. and liblogtrend has /usr/bin/genkeys.pl (although, again, not in Fedora). dkim-milter has dkim-genkey and asterisk has astgenkey. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 92beb6495a856884ca343787ab2f7c9d4b9d3aba21526c2e1f6ba38736c67a23 asleap-2.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not.correct * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: asleap = 2.2-1.fc11 asleap(x86-64) = 2.2-1.fc11 = libcrypto.so.7()(64bit) libpcap.so.0.9()(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X generically named /usr/bin/genkeys. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 Kashif Ahmad Khan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(thedangerco...@ya | |hoo.com)| --- Comment #5 from Kashif Ahmad Khan 2008-12-20 15:07:31 EDT --- hey guys!!! sorry for late reply,,, Actually my semester exams are going on so i am stuck in that. So i can't remove the mplayer dependency now. can't you guys do that ? Is there anything else i could do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 15:01:22 EDT --- Were you going to address those rpmlint complaints? The first does seem to be bogus, the second should be fixed, shouldn't it? I mean, it's nice that you post the rpmlint output, but that only means that you know there are issues to be addressed, and I'd have to bring them up at review anyway. By the way, if you pass -i to sed it will edit the file in place or make a backup for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476386] Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-12-20 14:58:26 EDT --- I've pushed this filename issue to upstream http://www.veripool.org/boards/28/topics/show/53 I'll update the package once upstream notifies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 14:57:19 EDT --- That makes a pretty good case that the bulkquery and demo plugins should not be packaged where they are. I don't see a problem with moving them to live with the documentation, or with just not packaging them at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-20 14:49:37 EDT
---
Sorry for not getting back to this earlier; there are so many packages to look
at.
You linked to the wrong srpm above; I've found the right one.
I guess when following those packaging guidelines you didn't look at the whole
set of examples. Unless you have some specific reason for using the most
verbose and complicated means of constructing your %files list, why not just
use the simple one? I mean, you entire %files list could be the following:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README LICENSE NAME.txt NEWS.txt
%{python_sitelib}/*
rpmlint says:
python-epsilon.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
(spaces: line 7, tab: line 16)
I don't think this is a particularly big issue; fix it if you like.
Not that it matters much, but you can do without dos2unix by simply calling
sed:
sed -i 's/\r//' NAME.txt
Where did the
%{?!python:%define python python}
along with all of the %{python} macro usage come from? I'm having a tough time
understanding why you would want that. I guess it would be useful if we had
multiple python versions in the distro at once and you want to build
python3-epsilon, except that everyone's been adamant that will not happen.
Given that, it just seems like noise.
I note that several of the source files carry no licensing information.
Upstream should be prodded to put that information on every source file.
I note that the tarball downloaded from the Source0: URL does not match what
you have in this package. Any reason why there's a difference?
Only the last issue is an absolute blocker, but the specfile cleanliness stuff
(needlessly complex %files list, pointless %{python} macro) are things that
someone else might approve, but because I'm a fan of using the minimum amount
of spec file to do the job, I won't personally accept them. There's a really
nice python package template in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-python.spec
which, once it's adapted, makes a nice minimal python spec file, and that's the
kind of spec file that I personally like to see. So I'm going to leave this
review for someone else to look at.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477199] Review Request: PolicyKit-kde - PolicyKit integration for the KDE desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-20 13:24:46 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476387] Review Request: vhd2vl - VHDL to Verilog translator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476387 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-20 13:24:49 EDT --- vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vhd2vl-2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477338] New: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.spb.su QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-imagick/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: php-pecl-imagick is a native php extension to create and modify images using the ImageMagick API. Rpmlint produces only this errors: php-pecl-imagick.athlon: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/INSTALL php-pecl-imagick.athlon: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/TODO But this files has zero length in upstream, so I thought this may be safely ignored. Koji build are successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012208 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473765] Review Request: xvidcap - An X-Windows screen capture tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473765 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-20 12:30:44 EDT --- Kashif, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20
12:23:23 EDT ---
rpmlint output
[...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint cmconvert-1.9.5-3.fc10.src.rpm
cmconvert.src:38: E: files-attr-not-set
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- Is 'mkdir -p -m 0755 %{buildroot}/usr' really needed?
- Use make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" to preserve the
timestamps instead of make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
- There is no need to pack the file 'INSTALL' because it contains only generic
information which are not useful when installed from RPM
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ti...@math.uh.edu | |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472060] Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|fab...@bernewireless.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440
--- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20
11:50:45 EDT ---
This is the rpmlint output after the rebuild
[...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm
bluemindo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 4)
bluemindo.src: W: strange-permission 77133a-bluemindo-0.2.1.tar.gz 0755
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
This is easy to fix.
[...@laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc9.noarch.rpm
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/modules/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/media/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/libs/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/gui/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/common/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/plugins/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/bluemindo/src/handlers/__init__.py
bluemindo.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/bluemindo.mo
bluemindo.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/bluemindo.mo
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings.
About the shebang stuff, perhaps it is easier to report upstream that they fix
the files. Or separate those files.
Some comment after a quick look at your new spec file
- %{__install} -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} is twice listed
- Where is %{menudir} and %{icondir} defined? Remains from the old spec file?
- 'Keep in mind that usage of %find_lang in packages containing locales is a
MUST.'
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
- Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files for
the handling of the .desktop file
- You should preserve the timestamps
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-20 11:10:08 EDT --- Seems fine now, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-12-20 10:47:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > All should be fixed. Seems fine now. I have a strong feeling you mistyped the SRPM URL though :) > SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec Doesn't matter much since all changes were in SPEC file only. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471275] Review Request: mod_scgi - Python implementation of the SCGI protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471275 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-20 10:02:22 EDT --- All should be fixed. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mod_scgi/mod_scgi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #20 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 10:00:06 EDT --- Ah... + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-mpbsd --enable-cxx configure: error: --target is not appropriate for GMP Use --build=CPU-VENDOR-OS if you need to specify your CPU and/or system explicitly. Use --host if cross-compiling (see "Installing GMP" in the manual for more on this). ...looks like a broken configure? Ivana, can you a bit investigate, whether there is really no fix for this and/or explain the %define in the spec file how it should be? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #19 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:58:59 EDT --- For gmp-4.2.4-3, rpmlint doesn't seem to be silent (or is my rpmlint just broken?): gmp-devel.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog gmp-static.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog Ivana, can you explain why a separate %configure is defined, rather using the default configure from redhat-rpm-config? So if there still is a valid reason for this own define, please add an explaining comment to the spec file, otherwise use %configure (the config.* is no longer copied since F-10 or so, if that was the reason for the own %configure). Please use "if [ $1 = 0 ]; then" in %preun, currently you're comparing something quoted. Please only use "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in %clean rather the current. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:45:28 EDT --- rpmlint says: ocaml-pa-do.x86_64: E: no-binary which we think is OK for OCaml packages (bug 433783). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #22 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:45:54 EDT --- Patrice, Hans, Jason - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:41:59 EDT --- Jakub, Roland - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ti...@math.uh.edu ||) --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:38:56 EDT --- Jason, Miloslav - ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:40:29 EDT --- I don't know why, but this has been resolved upstream with their latest version. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012164 Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm * Sat Dec 20 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.8.1-1 - New upstream release 0.8.1. - Run omake with the --verbose option to try to debug Koji failures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226542] Merge Review: words
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|k...@redhat.com |red...@linuxnetz.de Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+, ||needinfo?(k...@redhat.com) --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:36:00 EDT --- As Roozbeh did not continue the review for more than 1.5 years now, I'm now and hereby just silently overtaking the review. Re-assinging the bug report to me first, as it is usual for a Package Review. So rpmlint is completely silent, good job until now. Rest of the package is sane according to my knowledge of being a packager. Some suggestions, I really would like to see, but no must: - Remove "BuildRequires: coreutils", something else anyway pulls that in - Replace "Source: mwords.tar.Z" by "Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20060527013227/http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/ilash/Moby/mwords.tar.Z"; as it is a valid source URL and everybody can verify it Karel, olease close the bug report once you've applied the changes or let me know why you won't do this and close this bug report therewith. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:28:09 EDT --- In case you're wondering about the difference between this package and bug 477313 (ocaml-preludeml), they are aimed at two different areas. That package, prelude.ml, is for parallelizing across multicores on the same system. This package can parallelize across a cluster of machines, and also has a more theoretically sound basis in that you can prove various sequential properties of the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 09:24:45 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1012139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477320] New: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-p3l-2.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OCamlP3l is a compiler for Caml parallel programs. The OCamlP3l programming paradigm is skeleton programming. The skeletons encapsulate basic parallel programming patterns in a well understood and structured approach. Based on P3L, the Pisa Parallel Programming Language, OCamlP3l skeleton algebra is embedded in a full-fledged functional programming language, namely Objective Caml. The skeleton programming approach used in OCamlP3l allows three different operational interpretations of the same source program: * the sequential interpretation which is deterministic, hence easy to understand and debug, * the parallel interpretation using a network of computing nodes run in parallel to speed up the computation, * the graphical interpretation, which is run to obtain a drawing of the parallel computing network deployed at run-time by the parallel interpretation. rpmlint is clean. The documentation is rather large (7MB), so I tried to "even things up" by putting the documentation into a -doc subpackage. However that leaves a rather small -devel package. Does this matter? Koji scratch build coming up shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457325] Review Request: eboard - Chess board interface for ICS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457325 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2008-12-20 09:20:16 EDT --- Should be fixed. Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eboard/eboard.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eboard/eboard-1.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 --- Comment #24 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:12:20 EDT --- Joe, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(varek...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #32 from Robert Scheck 2008-12-20 09:15:17 EDT --- Ivana, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477307] Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-12-20 09:08:22 EDT --- I guess it's the same tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 --- Comment #8 from Florent le Coz 2008-12-20 09:08:22 EDT --- Oh, really sorry :( Here are the files : http://louizatakk.fedorapeople.org/bluemindo-0.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://louizatakk.fedorapeople.org/bluemindo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477307] Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-12-20
08:47:55 EDT ---
this package already exists in fedora ?
please check if is the same.
yum search netcat
nc.i386 : Reads and writes data across network connections using TCP or UDP
nc6.i386 : Netcat with IPv6 Support
socat.i386 : Bidirectional data relay between two data channels ('netcat++')
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 Andrea Musuruane changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-20 08:20:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libicns Short Description: Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files Owners: musuruan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476357] Review Request: libicns - Library for manipulating Macintosh icns files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476357 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-12-20 08:13:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I'm APPROVING this; you can fix the pkgconfig and Source0 stuff before you > import it. And please, *before* :). Here they are: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/libicns-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Fixed Source0 URL - Added missing 'Requires: pkgconfig' to devel package Now I'll ask for CVS :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #327532|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 08:09:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327532) Parallel mandlebrot set An auto-parallelizing mandlebrot set program, which uses this library. Adapted from: http://fhtr.blogspot.com/2008/08/preludeml-some-parallel-combinators.html Compile using: ocamlfind opt -package preludeml -linkpkg mandlebrot.ml -o mandlebrot Run using: ./mandlebrot 5000 test.pgm eog test.pgm (It will auto-detect the number of cores in your system and spread the work across them.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 07:58:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.src.rpm Just a tiny change to the META file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] New: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.1.20080922.fc11.src.rpm Description: Prelude.ml is a collection of utility functions for OCaml programs. Of particular interest are high level parallel combinators, which make multicore parallelization of OCaml programs easy. (Note that despite the "0.1" version number, this package is very mature - it just doesn't have any upstream releases). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1011869 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2008-12-20 05:49:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Ok, I already commited and built License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ to rawhide, I do > plan > next xmlto release in January (hopefully) - will add the comment about > licenses > in next rawhide build later. It is ok to add the comment without creating a new rawhide in build. It will make it easier to not forget about it. :-) Btw. did you write Eric an e-mail? If you did not, I can do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477307] New: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477307 Summary: Review Request: netcat - Network utility to read and write data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/netcat.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/netcat-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://netcat.sourceforge.net/ Description: Netcat is a featured networking utility which reads and writes data across network connections, using the TCP/IP protocol. It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can be used directly or easily driven by other programs and scripts. At the same time, it is a feature rich network debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost any kind of connection you would need and has several interesting built in capabilities. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1010021 rpmlint output: [...@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint netcat* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint netcat* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Bug 459989 depends on bug 473814, which changed state. Bug 473814 Summary: rpm's pkgconfig auto provides is broken (fix included) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 What|Old Value |New Value Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
