[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 03:08:11 EDT --- I will review this. Instead I would appreciate it if you would review my review request for rubygem-hpricot (bug 477526) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477948] New: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 Summary: Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kagesenshi...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/simple-ccsm/simple-ccsm-0.7.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains a simplified gui configuration tool to configure Compiz plugins and the composite window manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477949] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexey.rad...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hlterm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/hlterm/perl-Term-Highlight.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hlterm/perl-Term-Highlight-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror= Description: Term::Highlight is a Perl module which can be used to highlight unlimited number of specified patterns with different colors using terminal color escape sequences. Term::Highlight supports 256 and 8 colors capable terminals. The package is shipped with full-featured script 'hl' which can also be used as grep-like engine. You can use hl just to learn perl regular expressions! This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Alexey Radkov alexey.rad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Bug 459989 depends on bug 473814, which changed state. Bug 473814 Summary: rpm's pkgconfig auto provides is broken (fix included) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-26
04:23:28 EDT ---
This package was reviewed during an active conversion via IRC, so I must
mention that the problems mentioned inside were fixed in real time
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM:
wordxtr.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Create hunspell dictionary from given
plain text input data files.
wordxtr.src: E: description-line-too-long This package will help you to create
hunspell dictionary for given input language
= fixed in next release
binary RPM:
wordxtr.noarch: E: devel-dependency hunspell-devel
= this is needed as such (for the wordlist2hunspell provided by
hunspell-devel)
wordxtr.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Create hunspell dictionary from given
plain text input data files.
wordxtr.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This package will help you to
create hunspell dictionary for given input language
= fixed in next release
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: ce5a9692f6357648a1de6856d34edb21ad77d168
wordxtr-0.0.1.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[!] Final provides and requires are sane.
* Duplicate BuildRequires: python-devel (by python-setuptools)
= also fixed in next release
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Not tested but as it is a simple python script, it should work on all arch
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Final Notes ===
All issues were fixed during the interactive conversation via IRC
*** APPROVED
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 04:33:44 EDT --- Thanks for quick review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: wordxtr Short Description: hunspell dictionary creator Owners: pnemade Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com 2008-12-26 04:43:50 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #37 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2008-12-26 04:52:50 EDT --- Yes, this is package is in excellent shape. Please make CVS request after #476374 is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 05:50:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bkchem Short Description: Chemicaldrawing tool Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477953] New: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477953 Summary: Review Request: podcatcher - Armangil's podcast client for the command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris...@damian.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/podcatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/podcatcher-3.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Armangil's podcatcher is a podcast client for the command line. It provides several download strategies (new shows only, back-catalog allowed, etc), offers cache management, supports BitTorrent, and generates playlists for media player applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #38 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 06:01:48 EDT --- Thank you, guys. I've made a CVS request for python-oasa following the instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure (I hope this is the right procedure). I'll be waiting for your ok (or not) to bkchem too. Happy new year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Radkov alexey.rad...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 08:19:18 EDT --- See some doc with screenshots at http://hlterm.wiki.sourceforge.net/General+Info+and+Usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477958] New: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Summary: Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a...@unix.sh QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, herr...@owlriver.com, cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fab...@bernewireless.net, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fe...@fetzig.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/id3mtag/ SRPM URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/id3mtag/ Description: ID3 mass tagger is a tool for manipulating id3 and id3v2 tags in multiple files. It can generate tag fields from the filename and other variables, and/or rename files, using an intuitive syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Avi Alkalay a...@unix.sh changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #16 from Muayyad Alsadi als...@ojuba.org 2008-12-26 09:06:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327854) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327854) gdb-session trying to know where does it crash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #17 from Muayyad Alsadi als...@ojuba.org 2008-12-26 09:07:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327855) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327855) backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Muayyad Alsadi als...@ojuba.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||als...@ojuba.org --- Comment #18 from Muayyad Alsadi als...@ojuba.org 2008-12-26 09:11:40 EDT --- I have a problem with it in i386 (some people in IRC told be they don't have it in 64) the problem goes like this it render the .sif file successfully (any .sif file .eg for the examples) and after it finish it SIGFAULT and that happens even after leaving } of main I attached a gdb session and gdb backtrace the problem seems to be while calling the destructor of some class here or there or in gnu c libs #0 0x02081504 in fini_context_translations () at setrans_client.c:217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #19 from Muayyad Alsadi als...@ojuba.org 2008-12-26 09:13:00 EDT --- BTW: there are .src.rpm in http://zelgadis.profusehost.net/files/rpms/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 09:16:16 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-hpricot/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Dec 26 2008 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 0.6.164-2 - Kill unneeded files more Koji build - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022283 - For dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #59 from Stefan Seefeld seef...@sympatico.ca 2008-12-26 09:43:20 EDT --- I'm not sure why this only shows up now, but you are certainly right. I removed some long obsolete code and those exit() calls are now gone. Please find the latest spec / srpm at: http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis-0.11-4.fc9.src.rpm http://stefan.fedorapeople.org/synopsis.spec Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 09:55:11 EDT --- For 0.0.1-1: * Documents - Would you check if Rakefile or Manifest.txt really needed? - README.txt should be marked as %doc. * Possibly duplicate/conflicting files with system ones - This rpm contains net/pop.rb, net/smtp.rb. These are already included in ruby-libs rpm (however the files in ruby-libs seems older than those in this rpm). Can these files safely installed in parallel? * CRLF line terminators - Some ruby scripts in this rpm have CRLF line terminators (although my rpmlint could not detect them...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 09:53:01 EDT --- By the way for CVS request you don't have to wait for python-oasa review requst to completely be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476360] Review Request: rubygem-tlsmail - This library enables pop or smtp via ssl/tls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476360 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 10:02:13 EDT --- Oops.. * ruby abi requirement - Also ruby(abi) requirement is needed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26
10:40:57 EDT ---
For 1.1-1:
* License
- License tag must be LGPLv2+
* Documents
- Please check if Rakefile is really needed.
- README, LICENSE should be marked as %doc.
* %geminstdir
-
%files
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
-
- can be replaced by %{geminstdir}/ because you defined
this macro.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #60 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 10:43:57 EDT --- Okay. -- This package (synopsis) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- Please release new version when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Stefan Seefeld seef...@sympatico.ca changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #61 from Stefan Seefeld seef...@sympatico.ca 2008-12-26 11:06:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: synopsis Short Description: source-code introspection tool Owners: stefan Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-26 11:54:27 EDT --- Added CFLAGS Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/yersinia-0.7.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #40 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 12:11:55 EDT --- I've started a CVS request for bkchem too. Am I doing this ahead of time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475055] Review Request: gfan - Software for Compu ting Gröbner Fans and Tropical Varieties
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26
12:16:13 EDT ---
Some notes:
* License
- The license tag should be GPL+ as no version is specified
- However LICENSE (and also README) file also says that files
under doc/ are non-free.
Please follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
and remove all files under doc/ from the source tarball
completely.
- Include LICENSE file as %doc as this is important.
* CFLAGS
- I guess
-
export CFLAGS=%{optflags}
export CXXFLAGS=%{optflags}
-
is not needed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fab...@bernewireless.net
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-26
12:14:31 EDT ---
This is only an informal review because I can't sponsor you.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: F9/i386
[!] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
[...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint nopaste-2835-1.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Binary RPM(s): [1]
[...@laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint nopaste*
nopaste.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Upstream source:
Build source:
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales.
[-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every
%files section.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install.
[-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: F9/i386
[x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022395
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Changelog in allowed format
[1] Remove the %doc in the %file section
[2] The header of the script says '# Released under the GNU General Public
License v2'. For me this is not looking like GPLv2+.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[Bug 473754] Review Request: nopaste - Command-line interface to rafb.net/paste
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473754 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-26 12:14:52 EDT --- [x] Package functions as described. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #41 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2008-12-26 12:20:04 EDT --- It's ok, continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 12:23:30 EDT --- Please fill in CVS request template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477971] New: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Summary: Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arping.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/arping-2.08-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.habets.pp.se/synscan/programs.php?prog=arping Description: Arping is a util to find out it a specific IP address on the LAN is 'taken' and what MAC address owns it. Sure, you could just use 'ping' to find out if it's taken and even if the computer blocks ping (and everything else) you still get an entry in your ARP cache. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022402 rpmlint output: [...@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint arping* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [...@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint arping* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #15 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 12:43:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-oasa Short Description: Python library that handles chemical formats Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka (In reply to comment #14) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bkchem Short Description: Chemicaldrawing tool Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: jkeating mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476374] Review Request: python-oasa - python library for manipulation of chemical formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476374 --- Comment #16 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 12:46:17 EDT --- Please, forget the anterior form. I am very busy here and made a mistake in sending. The python-oasa is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 12:49:59 EDT --- How do you think about the previous discussion for this package (on bug 467157)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 12:50:16 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477971 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-26 12:50:16 EDT --- *** Bug 467157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #43 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2008-12-26 12:52:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bkchem Short Description: Chemical drawing tool Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: terjeros mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475132] Review Request: usbmon - Front-end for in-kernel usbmon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475132 Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com 2008-12-26 15:15:16 EDT --- yum install usbmon works in Rawhide (10.90), closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ripmime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477979] New: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Summary: Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime-1.4.0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages koji scratch build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1022551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477990] New: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ke...@tummy.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/xfce4-settings/xfce4-settings-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package includes the settings manager applications for the Xfce desktop. Note: this package is part of the upcoming Xfce 4.6. You will need: libxfce4util-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm libxfcegui4-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm libxfce4menu-4.5.92-1.fc11.src.rpm exo-0.3.92-1.fc11.src.rpm (In that order) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477990] Review Request: xfce4-settings - Settings Manager for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477990 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477839] Review Request: libxfce4menu - A freedesktop.org compliant menu implementation for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477839 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474827] Review Request: xteddy - Tool to sit around silently, look cute, and make you smile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474827 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-26 20:00:23 EDT --- I can take a look at reviewing this... look for a full review in a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455164] Review-Request: NaturalDocs - Documentation generator for multiple programming languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455164 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-26 19:56:35 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this... look for a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Bug 468467 depends on bug 468466, which changed state. Bug 468466 Summary: Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-26 20:05:12 EDT --- close bug, because there is no benefit for fedora if you`re not agree and think this would be a good package you can reopen it. the spec and srpm will be preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-26 20:05:20 EDT --- close bug, because there is no benefit for fedora if you`re not agree and think this would be a good package you can reopen it. the spec and srpm will be preserved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477971] Review Request: arping - Ethernet Layer 2 ping tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477971
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-27
00:27:11 EDT ---
There already exists an utility named arping packaged for fedora (it's in the
iputils rpm), so for sure you cannot use
%{_mandir}/man*/%{name}*.*
%{_bindir}/arping
As of comments, I still stand behind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157#c7 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470#c5 (and the next ones from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477854] Review Request: yersinia - Network protocols tester and attacker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477854
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-27
01:02:03 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:GPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: cacb446548d076149de0a71a6c03cd2edaa14660
yersinia-0.7.1.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64 + koji scratch build
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[-] %check is present and the test passes.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478007] New: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dti...@iinet.net.au QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. rpmlint is not clean: vmware-requirements.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:47: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel vmware-requirements-server-console.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. Notes: 1. Is there a way in an x86_64 .spec require an eg gtk2.i386 package, without resorting to named file path Requires ? 2. I can make some small readme files to satisfy the no-documentation warnings 3. No binary is correct. The top level package pulls in the 2x sub packages, for the case where you want to run the vmware-server-console on the same machine as the vmware-server. 4. This does not require the VMware's non-open source vmware-server rpms. It only provides an easy way to get prerequisite packages installed so that vmware-server package can run, which saves a lot of messing around. 5. Is it worth changing the name to vmware-prerequisites: $ su -c 'yum install vmware-prerequisites' might be clearer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477760] Review Request: wordxtr - hunspell dictionary creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477760 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-27 02:14:26 EDT --- wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordxtr-0.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
