[Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Alias||perl-WWW-Curl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED| --- Comment #19 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-10 01:32:18 EDT --- I will review it in few days or next week end. Thanks for your efforts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-10 01:29:06 EDT --- https://svn.enthought.com/enthought/ticket/1765 Upstream is working on fixing this issue. They planning to make most of the things to BSD 3-clause. Images are in there original license only. So, present license tag will be mix of all those licenses. I will wait for few days and check if they move quickly. If not I will update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475098] Review Request: python-Traits - Explicitly typed attributes for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475098 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-10 01:29:52 EDT --- The only file in GPLv2+ is actually a mistake done by someone. They are also planning to re-license that if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #18 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2009-01-10 01:16:38 EDT --- Having dealt with all three issues in comment #14, I 'd like to ask you to reconsider opening this review request. Thanks, Pol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-10 00:27:53 EDT --- With the new spec, the only complaint from rpmlint is: cvs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/cvs/contrib/sccs2rcs 0644 which is safe to be ignored, given that this is intentional (avoids bringing csh in as dependency). To be honest, I would have done a chmod a-x on all the scripts from the contrib dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225672] Merge Review: cvs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225672 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-10 00:25:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328612) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328612) a cleaner spec - makes use of SMP - removes the obsolete [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] check - converts FAQ to UTF-8 - marks /etc/profile.d/* and /etc/pam.d/cvs as %config(noreplace). Not sure how useful that would be but it does not hurt - adding an INSTALL="install -p" to make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-Linux_Security_Guide - A security guide for linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #19 from Eric Christensen 2009-01-10 00:09:56 EDT --- Latest version... Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463587] Review Request: cwirc - An X Chat plugin to allow send and receive morse code over IRC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463587 --- Comment #13 from Randall Berry 2009-01-09 23:34:54 EDT --- Submitted for testing on F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-09 22:27:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328610) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328610) revised spec according to fedora guidelines I've taken a look at the current version (http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash-4.0-7.6.src.rpm) and did a local mock rebuild. I am attaching a slightly revised spec which fixes part of the problems. The major issues (I have not tried to fix any of these because I am not familiar with the requirements of this special package) are that 1. the package uses it's own versions of several utilities/libs (at least gdb and readline) which contradicts the guidelines. However, according to http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash_whitepaper/ this is intended. 2.the package builds a static binary. Once again, this is intended 3.fedora compile flags are completely ignored. This also seems to be intended, each of the libraries is built with a different set of flags. Easily fixable stuff (not done): - SMP_FLAGS are not used (I did not know if it's OK to use them ) - the source files (included in -debuginfo) have the exec bit set, which makes rpmlint unhappy - license seems to be GPLv2+. A lot of files are GPL+, some are GPLv2+, some have no license at all. A cleanup of those would be nice Other problems (fixed) - usage of forbidden tags (packager, vendor) or incorrect values (buildroot, source0) - some aesthetic warnings from rpmlint - missing license file from the binary rpm - there was no changelog. I have added one but it should be properly populated - timestamps (for docs/man) were not preserved - defattr was missing in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-01-09 22:29:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse Short Description: Parse Date::Parse compatible formats Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479223] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse - Parse Date::Parse compatible formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479223
manuel wolfshant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-09
21:35:14 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:empty
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPL+ or Artistic
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 0c7db13f1481bbb7587625d11d14f352ea6cfc8b
DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.04.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build
[?] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[+] "make test" passes
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #328515|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-09 20:48:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328609) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328609) failed build log Make test fails: t/003_perl_critic... # Failed test 'Test::Perl::Critic for "blib/lib/Eval/Context.pm"' # at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Test/Perl/Critic.pm line 99. # See attachment for full error log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-09 20:15:26 EDT --- Excellent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474983] Review Request: TVAnytimeAPI - A java API for parsing, manipulating and creating TV-Anytime metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474983 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-01-09 17:34:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/TVAnytimeAPI-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm - Removed the xml/ subdir for legal problems. - Also removed lib/* and docs/ because I was already modifying the source archive anyway. - Added examples/ to the docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475019] Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-01-09 17:31:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/opencsv-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Everything has been addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 17:08:31 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475508] Review Request: javassist - The Java Programming Assistant provides simple Java bytecode manipulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475508 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 17:08:34 EDT --- javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javassist-3.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229
Tadej Janež changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(tadej.ja...@tadej |
|.hicsalta.si) |
--- Comment #4 from Tadej Janež 2009-01-09
15:51:39 EDT ---
Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review my package and I apologize for
not responding to your review earlier.
(In reply to comment #2)
> Some notes:
>
> * BuildRequires/Requires
> - build.log shows
>
> 80 Failed to import numarray: PyQwt will be build without support for
> numarray.
> 81 Failed to find Numeric2: PyQwt will be build without support for
> Numeric.
> .
> 86 'disable_numarray': False,
> 87 'disable_numeric': False,
> 88 'disable_numpy': False,
>
> These message seems contradictory.
> Perhaps "BuildRequires: python-numarray python-numeric"
> is needed.
I would prefer to avoid all this and just disable support for Numarray and
Numeric at configure stage. As far as I know, Numpy is deemed as a replacement
for both Numarray and Numeric.
> - Also please check if numpy (or python-numarray, python-numeric)
> are also needed for "Requires" (not BuildRequires).
> For python module related packages, writing a package in
> "BuildRequires" does not mean that the package is installed
> at runtime.
Yes, it is definitely needed at run time, so I added it to "Requires".
> - And check if PyQwt-devel does not require "qwt-devel".
> For example, QwtList.sip contains:
> -
> 34 %MappedType QList
> 35 {
> 36 %TypeHeaderCode
> 37 #include
> 38 #include
> 39 %End
> -
Yes, you are right. I added qwt-devel to PyQwt-devel's "Requires".
> * Timestamps
> - 'INSTALL="install -p"' argument to "make install" does not
> make sense for this package because this makefile is not
> based on autotools but based on python
> (actually when installing files "cp -f" is used)
I don't completely understand how (not) using autotools affects the use of
"install -p" option, but I trust you that it is not necessary.
>
> * Permission of scripts
> -
> # non-executable script
> chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}/PyQt4/Qwt5/grace.py
> -
> - If this script is not meant to be called directly by
> users (but is meant to be called internally from programs
> or so), then this script should not have executable
> permission and the shebang should be removed.
grace.py could be executed directly but it requires 'grace' package to work.
If the user doesn't have it installed, it just crashes with an error that
'xmgrace' is not found. However, it seems bloated to me to add a new
'Requires: grace' just because some example script needs it.
Also, upstream is a bit confusing about executable scripts, because a similar
example script qplt.py could also have a shebang at the top and be made
executable but it doesn't have it.
I made grace.py executable because I received warning messages from rpmlint
and I decided that would be the simplest solution.
Maybe it is better to make all example scripts consistent and non-executable?
If so, I should remove the shebang from grace.py.
Updated spec file and source package are at
http://tadej.hicsalta.si/packages/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 Adam Miller changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457059] Review Request: txt2tags - A document converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457059 --- Comment #16 from Adam Miller 2009-01-09 15:42:18 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: txt2tags New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: maxamillion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877
--- Comment #8 from Christof Damian 2009-01-09 14:29:51
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> For -4:
>
> * Files
> - In %files:
>
> --
> 49 %{python_sitelib}
> --
> Well, this contains the directory %{python_sitelib} itself,
> which should not be owned by this package as this directory
> is owned by python package.
Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/python-progressbar.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/python-progressbar-2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Bug 476449 depends on bug 476386, which changed state. Bug 476386 Summary: Review Request: perl-verilog - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476386 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-09 13:31:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.461-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-09
13:05:10 EDT ---
in file (of verilator) src/V3Options.cpp:
&& !V3Options::fileStatNormal(var+"/src/systemperl.h")) {
if you remove /src, I believe it should pull systemperl.h from
perl-SystemPerl-devel. Can you check if please ?
in the 3.700 release notes, you are listed for:
- Add limited support for tristate inouts. Written by Lane Brooks. This allows
common pad ring and tristate-mux structures to be Verilated. See the
documentation for more information on supported constructs.
- Fix 'bad select range' warning missing some cases, bug43. [Lane Brooks]
good job Lane.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 250282] Package request/suggestion: kidled
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250282 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-01-09 12:36:52 EDT --- There was no response, so I'm just going to close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 Matthias Saou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matth...@rpmforge.net Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #46 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 12:33:07 EDT --- As discussed in bug #478633 I am hereby requesting the EL-5 branch for this package to be created, with me as the owner : Package Change Request == Package Name: ruby-gnome2 New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-01-09 12:32:56 EDT --- What's the current status of this package? If it doesn't actually work then there's not much point in reviewing it, so I'll mark it as not being ready for review. Please clear the whiteboard when the situation changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478877] Review Request: python-progressbar - Text progressbar library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478877
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09
12:36:24 EDT ---
For -4:
* Files
- In %files:
--
49 %{python_sitelib}
--
Well, this contains the directory %{python_sitelib} itself,
which should not be owned by this package as this directory
is owned by python package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #25 from Lane 2009-01-09 12:21:48 EDT --- New files available: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.700-1.fc10.src.rpm Changes include: - Removal of duplicate file per Comment #23. verilator depends on the file /usr/share/verilator/bin/verilator_includer, so I removed the duplicate in /usr/bin. - Added dependency of perl-SystemPerl-devel for both building and installing. For verilator to work correctly with perl-SystemPerl-devel, however, you must make the change to the perl-SystemPerl-devel spec file as documented on my comment on Bug 478759 and put the src files in /usr/include/SystemPerl/src - Updated to newly released verilator 3.700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09 11:52:31 EDT --- Okay, now: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-01-09 11:34:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > thats ok then. Do you got new package to complete review with fixes other > issues? I have to prepare new minor upstream release to fix rpmlint warnings, so I hope packages will be ready Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09 11:21:23 EDT --- Okay, then I will wait for gget review request (for sponsorship issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478780] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear - Attribute trait to cascade clearer actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478780 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-01-09 10:34:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Steven M. Parrish changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-09 10:03:42 EDT --- package is now part of packagekit and has been EOL'd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo 2009-01-09 10:06:23 EDT --- > chmod +r ? nope, chcon something-something :) Didn't realize mv-ing something into /var/www/blah instead of cp-ing it would annoy selinux, now I know :) If you try again now, it should work. Sorry for the delay --Gabriel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455700] Review Request: kpackagekit - KDE packagekit interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455700 Steven M. Parrish changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09 10:00:46 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 474999, which changed state. Bug 474999 Summary: Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject | |.org) | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09 09:59:48 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Bug 475017 depends on bug 474981, which changed state. Bug 474981 Summary: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-09 09:57:28 EDT --- For now I want to wait for the response from sendmail maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455585] Review Request: packagekit-qt - QT bindings for packagekit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455585 Steven M. Parrish changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-09 09:05:36 EDT --- Package is dead and has been EOL'd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455700] Review Request: kpackagekit - KDE packagekit interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455700 Bug 455700 depends on bug 455585, which changed state. Bug 455585 Summary: Review Request: packagekit-qt - QT bindings for packagekit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455585 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479413] New: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479413 Summary: Review Request: pywebdav - WebDAV library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: d...@danny.cz QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/pywebdav.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/pywebdav-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebDAV library for Python. WebDAV is an extension to the normal HTTP/1.1 protocol allowing the user to upload data, create collections of objects, store properties for objects, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475018] Review Request: xtvd - A client java library for easy access to the tv data from schedulesdirect.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475018 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys 2009-01-09 08:23:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd-2.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xtvd.spec The source archive is now created manually after a check out with svn. Nothing else changed. The naming is still the same - this is not before or after the 2.0.1 release, this _is_ the 2.0.1 release. With the exception that no archive is provided via download.sf.net but only a release tag on the svn was created (because only that license text was added as I requested). The previous release was 2.0 and the next will probably be 2.1 (if there will be a next version at all). I hope we can agree on this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2009-01-09 08:07:14 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm >- '%prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' looks a bit unusual. OK, it now uses %setup -q > - You should preserve the time stamps > - cp -p ... Done. Pixmap now preserves timestamp. > make install . INSTALL="install -p" Not required. The supplied makefile already does this (not an autoconf makefile anyway, so setting INSTALL won't do the right thing.) >Is 'Requires: qt4' necessary? I guess that rpm will pick this up automatically. No, it isn't. Yes rpm will get it as mathgl has it as a Requires.Fixed. > - Please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) OK. done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479004] Review Request: perl-SVG-Parser - XML Parser for SVG documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479004 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-09 07:43:10 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #19 from Gratien D'haese 2009-01-09 07:45:33 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm The validation script I wrote to test the RPMs produced the following output: == == Make a fresh RPM of Relax and Recover (rear) URL: http://rear.sourceforge.net == == Relax & Recover Version 1.7.12 / 2009-01-09 Creating archive '/tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz OK Creating RPM packages OK Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Finished in 6 seconds. == Unpack /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear## == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SPECS/rear.spec == 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpm -qp --requires /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 == rpm -qp --info /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == Name: rear Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.7.12Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Fri 09 Jan 2009 01:02:34 PM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: localhost.localdomain Group : Applications/ArchivingSource RPM: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Size: 466172 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) URL : http://rear.sourceforge.net Summary : Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Description : Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). This is work in progress, so some features are not yet implemented. == rpm -qpd /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (docfiles) == /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/README /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/readme.txt /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/validated/Fedora/9/i386.txt == rpm -qpc /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (configfiles) == /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf /etc/rear/default.conf /etc/rear/local.conf /etc/rear/site.conf /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt /etc/rear/templates/ISO_isolinux.cfg /etc/rear/templates
[Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 07:46:37 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474999] Review Request: gdata-java - Client libraries to write Google Data API client applications in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474999 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 07:38:01 EDT --- gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-java-1.28.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479397] internal system error, package manager error add/remove software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi, ||lmac...@redhat.com, ||rich...@hughsie.com, ||robin.norw...@gmail.com, ||smparr...@shallowcreek.net Component|Package Review |PackageKit AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rich...@hughsie.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 06:49:54 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474985] Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 06:51:43 EDT --- jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jakarta-commons-compress-0-0.1.20081205svn727209.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-09 06:33:09 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cpm Short Description: Console Password Manager Owners: mmahut Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 06:33:41 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474981] Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 06:32:54 EDT --- jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jcalendar-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 06:27:09 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 06:24:55 EDT --- Any progress with the seeking of a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 06:22:14 EDT --- - License is GPLv2+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-09 06:21:15 EDT --- Well done, good to go APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09
05:48:34 EDT ---
Some issues are similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958
- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are mixed
- Please use 'make install . INSTALL="install -p"' to preserve the time
stamps if possible
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
- %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)
- BuildRoot tag doesn't match the guidelines
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|fab...@bernewireless.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478971] Review Request: scid - A chess database application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478971 Andrea Musuruane changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-01-09 05:33:04 EDT --- Closing as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-09 05:26:38 EDT --- heh, yes. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 05:12:05 EDT --- Two other small things - BuildRoot tag doesn't match the guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - the manpage should not have %doc I will try to make an informal review today. I'm not a sponsor but I can help you to make some progress with this package till a sponsor will take care of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 04:58:00 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file - '%prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' looks a bit unusual. - Please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) - '--vendor fedora' is no longer needed see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor - Is 'Requires: qt4' necessary? I guess that rpm will pick this up automatically. - You should preserve the time stamps - cp -p ... - make install . INSTALL="install -p" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479397] New: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479397 Summary: internal system error, package manager error add/remove software Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boeu...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: package manager error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: control center add/remove software search parameter find a report opens: an internal system error has occured ... Steps to Reproduce: 1.add/remove software 2.search +parameter 3.find Actual results: report: an internal system error has occures... Expected results: software package Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478846] Review Request: cpm - Console Password Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478846 --- Comment #4 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-09 04:32:42 EDT --- Try this stuff! Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/cpm/cpm-0.23-0.1.beta.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 04:22:39 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcping-1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478628] Review Request: dhcping - DHCP daemon ping program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478628 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 04:22:42 EDT --- dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcping-1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479113] Review Request: hyphen-is - Icelandic hypenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479113 Caolan McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479112] Review Request: hyphen-id - Indonesian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479112 Caolan McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-09 03:51:45 EDT --- Need to a fix in djvulibre to import. Reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469811] Review Request: pdf2djvu - PDF to DjVu converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469811 Rakesh Pandit changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||479385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mma...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marek Mahut 2009-01-09 03:08:13 EDT --- Hello Cristian! * ossimPlanetQt-gcc43.patch did not fit, I had to remove your build root home location * I'm getting this error during --rebuild: http://pastebin.sk/en/10331/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 02:58:39 EDT --- pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 02:57:31 EDT --- pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfscalibration-1.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 02:58:35 EDT --- pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pfstmo-1.3.2-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
