[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 03:54:52 EDT --- Done: Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper-1.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 04:18:28 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hunspell-no New Branches: F-10 Owners: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472348] Review Request: hunspell-no - Norwegian hunspell dictionaaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472348 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||479599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-01-12 04:32:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aopalliance-1.0-1.20090111cvs.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the comments. I tried to address both issues in the new version. Writing a good summary for this is tough, though ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dkay...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12
04:45:46 EDT ---
- Please preserve the time stamps while copying
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
- It would be nice if you use the same style for commands everywhere in your
spec file. Relating to %{__rm} vs. rm
- 'Requires: webserver' has to be 'Requires: httpd'
- The URL of this project is http://sovix.org/sovix/Sovix
(http://gnu.org/software/sovix is a redirect)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226148] Merge Review: mlocate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226148
--- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trmac m...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 04:46:40 EDT
---
Thanks for the patch. I have applied most of it in mlocate-0.21.1-3, with the
following changes:
- add exit 0 to %triggerpostun as well
- Don't replace /etc/cron.daily by %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily.
Somebody might reasonably redefine %{_bindir} etc. to e.g. build a mlocate
package located under /opt/mlocate, but the cron.daily script must be in
/etc/cron.daily, where it is expected by cron configuration, not in
/opt/mlocate/etc/cron.daily, for example.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rjo...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rjo...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 04:49:22 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(ga...@kernel.cras ||hing.org) --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 04:51:18 EDT --- Any progress on this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|dkay...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 04:48:55 EDT --- sorry for the spurious assignments, I have not noticed that David is not in the packager group. I'll try to do a review myself later today, if I have the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 05:05:54 EDT --- Two other small things... - The URL should be 'http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/WebHome' - Please preserve the time stamps while copying https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) and leave %attr(755,root,root) away. Without further investigations, I think it will work. Or is there an issue with the permission of mkimage? For details https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(t...@niemueller.de ||) --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 05:08:09 EDT --- Is there any progress with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fab...@bernewireless.net
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12
05:26:13 EDT ---
Some comment before I do a full review.
- '-n %{name}-%{version}' is not needed in %setup because this is the default.
- ChangeLog is missing in %doc
- I personally like one line per BR ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504
--- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de
2009-01-12 05:22:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Please ask nautilus maintainer to make nautilus own
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{ephy_major}/extensions before doing such a thing
ref:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088#c25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469491
Mamoru, at least %{_libdir}/epiphany/ and %{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version} _are_
already owned by epiphany and also owning
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/extensions will _not_ help us here. Imagine
this:
/usr/lib/epiphany
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py*
When epiphany gets updated to 2.23 we have:
/usr/lib/epiphany (unowned)
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned)
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* (unowned)
/usr/lib/epiphany
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.23
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions
The next day the gget update comes:
/usr/lib/epiphany (unowned)
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned)
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions (unowned and empty)
/usr/lib/epiphany
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.23
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions/gget.py*
The problem is the version number in there.
This should only happen on rawhide, no problem.
You are right, there will be no major version update in the stable release. But
the other two problems will remain. We only have the alternatives of
- ether let both packages own the dirs or
- use strictly versioned deps and delay the epiphany update in rawhide because
of them. This is just like the firefox nightmares.
To me the latter is the worst. I'm open to suggestions though, because my gwget
package is also affected. I have been trying to find it's review, but gwget is
one of the former fedora.us packages and I took it over some time ago.
The only solution I can think of: Make epiphany own
%{_libdir}/epiphany/
%{_libdir}/epiphany/plugins
%{_libdir}/epiphany/extensions
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/plugins - %{_libdir}/epiphany/plugins
%{_libdir}/epiphany/%{version}/extensions - %{_libdir}/epiphany/extensions
What do you think, Mamoru?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(leigh123li...@goo ||glemail.com) --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 05:32:08 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(leigh123li...@goo | |glemail.com)| --- Comment #12 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-01-12 05:47:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Any progress on this? Not yet , I am still working on getting the dep's passed ( dpkg debhelper ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479645] New: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-uk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-uk-0.20030903-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ukrainian hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: hunspell-uk |Review Request: hyphen-uk - |- Ukrainian hyphenation |Ukrainian hyphenation rules |rules | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] New: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-mi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-mi-0.20080630-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Maori hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479647] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479647 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Dumpvar - Pure-OO reimplementation of dumpvar.pl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Dumpvar/perl-Devel-Dumpvar.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Dumpvar/perl-Devel-Dumpvar-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Most perl dumping modules are focused on serializing data structures into a format that can be rebuilt into the original data structure. They do this with a variety of different focuses, such as human readability, the ability to execute the dumped code directly, or to minimize the size of the dumped data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 06:10:54 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (63ff1e53152c60044ed8804d54e0d0e8c80e69eb hyph_uk_UA.zip), license (GPLv2+) is correct. APPROVED assuming you will use the correct name :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 06:14:11 EDT --- Is it hyphen or hunspell ? The bug name says hunspell, the spec / SRPM say hyphen, that source file is hunspell-hyphen... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #8 from Adam Stokes asto...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 06:20:53 EDT --- Under the status is says 'unapproved' could this be why? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 06:21:43 EDT --- mostly identical to bug 478533. all is fine, sha1sum matches (53d6bb363d21726aaad7e832bcd252c7ff7baa9f hunspell-hyphen-mi-0.1.20080630-beta.tar.gz), license (GPLv3+) is correct. Waiting for clarifications on the name. I assume hyphen-mi would be the correct one, but... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #9 from Adam Stokes asto...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 06:41:00 EDT --- Ok I re-applied, may I get approval now? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 06:38:09 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 06:45:03 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 06:49:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-mi Short Description: Maori hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479645] Review Request: hyphen-uk - Ukrainian hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479645 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 06:33:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-uk Short Description: Ukrainian hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479646] Review Request: hyphen-mi - Maori hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479646 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: hunspell-mi |Review Request: hyphen-mi - |- Maori hyphenation rules |Maori hyphenation rules --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 06:35:21 EDT --- hyphen-mi I mean, getting confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479666] New: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479666 Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl - perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl/perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: description here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479667] New: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Summary: Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-ORLite-Migrate/perl-ORLite-Migrate.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-ORLite-Migrate/perl-ORLite-Migrate-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: THIS CODE IS EXPERIMENTAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE SQLite is a light weight single file SQL database that provides an excellent platform for embedded storage of structured data. ORLite is a light weight single class Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) system specifically designed for (and limited to only) work with SQLite. ORLite::Migrate is a light weight single class Database Schema Migration enhancement for ORLite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479669] New: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-pushd/perl-File-pushd.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-pushd/perl-File-pushd-1.00-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: File::pushd does a temporary chdir that is easily and automatically reverted, similar to pushd in some Unix command shells. It works by creating an object that caches the original working directory. When the object is destroyed, the destructor calls chdir to revert to the original working directory. By storing the object in a lexical variable with a limited scope, this happens automatically at the end of the scope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226542] Merge Review: words
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226542 Karel Zak k...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(k...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #6 from Karel Zak k...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 07:41:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Some suggestions, I really would like to see, but no must: - Remove BuildRequires: coreutils, something else anyway pulls that in Fixed. - Replace Source: mwords.tar.Z by Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20060527013227/http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/ilash/Moby/mwords.tar.Z; as it is a valid source URL and everybody can verify it OK, good idea. Fixed. Karel, olease close the bug report once you've applied the changes or let me know why you won't do this and close this bug report therewith. Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||479669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #10 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 07:41:33 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||479667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478362] Review Request: fmirror - Mirror directories from ftp servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478362 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-01-12 08:03:35 EDT --- Thanks Christoph for your review and your help. I will incorporate the changes as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||at...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|at...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 08:05:49 EDT --- I will review this package. current problems: - the latest version is not packaged (there is 1.2.34 in rawhide) rpmlint errors: mingw32-libpng.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng12.dll.a mingw32-libpng.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng.dll.a mingw32-libpng.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpng12.la ^^^ I don't think we need libtool *la files installed, do we? Otherwise I don't see any other problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-12 08:30:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #10) Imagine this: /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* When epiphany gets updated to 2.23 we have: /usr/lib/epiphany (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22 (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany/2.22/extensions/gget.py* (unowned) /usr/lib/epiphany /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23 /usr/lib/epiphany/2.23/extensions Well, - As when epiphany is upgrade from 2.22 to 2.23, then I guess gget-epiphany-extension will no longer work (although I don't know this package well) unless gget is rebuilt against new epiphany. i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt gget-epiphany-extension should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case (theoretically). Some idea: - Add Conflicts: epiphany = 2.23 Conflicts: epiphany 2.22 - Ask epiphany maintainer to support Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-12 08:37:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - New version with a name change (comic - cartoon) I also made a wiki page for this font: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Serafettin_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-12 08:44:29 EDT --- Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany//extensions, making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-12 08:46:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I already do have an account, my login is madko. I'm just trying to log in but it says that my password has expired so i'm waiting for the reset password email... I guess you don't find my account because i haven't filled any details on it? well to get sponsored first you need to join the Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group (packager) at the flowing link. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/packager Can you do this as soon as possible ? after you join the packager's group then I will get your account sponsored and your package reviewed :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226380] Merge Review: rsync
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226380 --- Comment #10 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 09:10:14 EDT --- No special reason, I did a mistake in rsync-3.0.5-0.fc10 so I had to bump up to re-tag and build :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 --- Comment #9 from Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com 2009-01-12 09:34:18 EDT --- For what it is worth, I have a replacement for the VNC plugin. Trying to get it into upstream, and will post here for your convenience. It handles three of the common VNC viewers, so it is more distro and version independent, and provides an easy means to plugin any other VNC viewer that someone might want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Ubuntu Launchpad 130334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 --- Comment #10 from Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com 2009-01-12 09:37:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328742) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328742) Replacement VNC plugin for Service Discovery Applet This replaces vncviewer.py.in. It autodetects which vnc viewer is available, and handles the difference in command line parameters including the port / screen difference between XVNC and Vinagre. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-12 09:46:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) I can't change my password: 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. from https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/setnewpass/ your password has been mailed to you. https://fedorahosted.org/fas/ticket/84 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475000] Review Request: cmconvert - CacheMate import file converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475000 --- Comment #9 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer p...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 10:05:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Any progress with the seeking of a sponsor? I have been sponsored through another package but am drowning in work things (the usual heap after being 2 weeks on vacation), I hope to get this (and jpilot-backup) pushed in the next 2 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-01-12 10:04:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This is not an official review. 1. When applying patch #2, patch returns: patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line I've removed this patch and replaced it with a patch that update to latest trunk. There's only a handful of changes since the last beta. While this doesn't abort the build, the patch file should be fixed to not generate this error. 2. This would fail to run with SELinux activated. You should fix the context of the CGI script, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux. Creating a drraw-selinux subpackage would probably be ideal in this case. I'm not SELinux proficient, but I'll try to take care of that. Thanks for the pointer. In your opinion, does such a requirement block the review or can we save that for later ? 3. Patch #2 appears to be a bug fix. If you have filed a bug with the upstream source, you should reference this in your spec file; if not, you should file one and reference it. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment There's no bug tracker for this project. This was reported on their mailing list by a colleague of mine, as well as some patch for new features. Actually, even the svn repository is not public, but after a few mails with upstream, I now have read-only access. I'll post new spec and srpms when the selinux issue is addressed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmarc...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmarc...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmarc...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmarc...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225700] Merge Review: docbook-dtds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225700 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|mmarc...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225703] Merge Review: docbook-style-dsssl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225703 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|mmarc...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 --- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 10:42:58 EDT --- Spec file uses mixed spaces and tabs, please fix this issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470250] Review Request: docbook5-style-xsl - Norman Walsh's XSL stylesheets for DocBook 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470250 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|wo...@nobugconsulting.ro
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12
10:56:47 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:
fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper
fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
= acceptable, the daemon needs it's own user
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv3+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 7f4587d83e8c1bbfb142c645f5d40a4bee50bdb7
fsniper-1.3.1.tar.gz
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Final provides and requires are sane.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: devel/x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: koji scratch build
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047004)
[x] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[x] File based requires are sane.
[x] %check is present and the test passes.
=== Issues ===
1. Nice to have: upstart style initscript
*** APPROVED ***
David, thank you for pre-review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:18:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: irrlicht Short Description: A high performance real-time 3D engine Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:18:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tcl-zlib Short Description: Tcl extension for zlib support Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:18:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: SolarModel Short Description: Real-time 3D Solar System simulation Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #2 from Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:25:41 EDT --- Does not rebuild in mock, please check buildrequires and add all that are needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:30:26 EDT --- David, Manuel, thank you both for the review. Manuel, is there any documentation on the upstart-style initscripts? A quick search of fedora wiki for the word upstart didn't reveal much.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:34:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fsniper Short Description: A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477190] Review Request: cas - core analysis system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477190 --- Comment #10 from Adam Stokes asto...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:37:12 EDT --- Ok thanks to spot I am now sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479711] New: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479711 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration-Parse - Parse string that represents time duration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-Duration-Parse OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Duration-Parse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Duration-Parse-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Time::Duration::Parse is a module to parse human readable duration strings like _2 minutes and 3 seconds_ to seconds. It does the opposite of duration_exact() in Time::Duration and is roundtrip safe. So, the following is always true. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047036 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-12 11:42:42 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:47:38 EDT --- Thanks... BuildRequires: libxml2 = 2.4.8 was missing, as xmlcatalog used in build section as well. Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454020, which changed state. Bug 454020 Summary: Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 11:50:08 EDT --- Built for F-9, F-10, devel. Thanks for your patience on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243 Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-01-12 12:03:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share... Not that there is anything wrong with this, but maybe you're just not aware of the very handy storage service available to all Fedora contributors: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-01-12 12:16:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) - As when epiphany is upgrade from 2.22 to 2.23, then I guess gget-epiphany-extension will no longer work (although I don't know this package well) unless gget is rebuilt against new epiphany. Correct. It will no longer work because epiphany won't find it, because it's looking in a different location. i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt gget-epiphany-extension should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case (theoretically). I disagree. It's better to temporarily loose a certain functionality than prevent epiphany from being updated. People who are using rawhide are used to thinks breaking from time to time, but still they are running rawhide because they want to follow the latest development. What if the epiphany update is part of a larger Gnome update? The older epiphany might no longer work with the updated Gnome stuff and then we make the whole app useless instead of a single extension. Some idea: - Add Conflicts: epiphany = 2.23 Conflicts: epiphany 2.22 Congratulations, you have just made it conflict with _every_ epiphany release! :) - Ask epiphany maintainer to support Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22, for example. And them make the extension Requires: epiphany(abi) = 2.22? What's the advantage over Requires: epiphany = 2.22? (In reply to comment #14) Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany//extensions, making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified. Why? We have a couple of these situations whenever one package does not necessarily depend on the other. Duplicate ownership of a dir is bad, but unowned dirs are even worse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474603] Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 13:00:06 EDT --- Built for F-9, F-10, devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474606] Review Request: SolarModel - Realtime 3D Solar System simulation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474606 Bug 474606 depends on bug 474603, which changed state. Bug 474603 Summary: Review Request: irrlicht - A high performance realtime 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474603 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] New: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Summary: Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@pobox.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit/cgit.spec SRPM URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit/cgit-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an attempt to create a fast web interface for the git scm, using a builtin cache to decrease server io-pressure. In addition to the spec and srpm above, the output of a mock build for F-10 i386 is at: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/cgit Potential concerns are that cgit currently requires some git sources to build. Eventually, this will be fixed when libgit2 is ready. Near term, Lars is working upstream to include the needed git files in the cgit tarballs. Another minor issue is package cleanup. The package owns the cache dir, /var/cache/cgit, but it won't know about the files created within that dir. Would a %preun script to delete these files be appropriate? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477732] Review Request: xfconf - Hierarchical configuration system for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-12 13:10:21 EDT --- Yes? I was at fudcon this weekend, and intend to import and build this sometime soon this week time permitting. I need to first build the new libxfce4util package. Sorry for any delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 13:12:18 EDT --- Licensing history looks clean, I will assume it is unless evidence to the contrary appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504
--- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-12
13:27:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #13)
i.e. if epiphany can be upgraded without gget-epiphany-extension
is rebuilt, it is _already_ wrong. Not-rebuilt
gget-epiphany-extension
should prevent epiphany from being upgraded in such a case
(theoretically).
I disagree. It's better to temporarily loose a certain functionality than
prevent epiphany from being updated. People who are using rawhide are used to
thinks breaking from time to time, but still they are running rawhide because
they want to follow the latest development.
What if the epiphany update is part of a larger Gnome update? The older
epiphany might no longer work with the updated Gnome stuff and then we make
the
whole app useless instead of a single extension.
A larger Gnome update in your sense had been already disturbed before
many times (largely because some new gnome components won't build against
new gnome libraries, gnome-desktop for example...).
Other packages failing to rebuild have also prevented major packages in
your sense from being upgraded. I can see no gain to loose dependency
on this package for the reason you raised (and for this package
you can simply remove this, while for gnome-desktop (for example)
we actually have to wait until (almost) all package are rebuilt)
Some idea:
- Add Conflicts: epiphany = 2.23
Conflicts: epiphany 2.22
Congratulations, you have just made it conflict with _every_ epiphany release!
:)
First of all:
- Please don't use congratulations :) or ! carelessly, please.
While I don't know how commonly these words or emoticons are used
in discussions like this bug report in your country,
these words can be taken very differently than what you expect
in other countries.
Then:
if epiphany has 2.22{,X} version, the epiphany won't conflict
with these two.
Note that this method is sometimes used when
- A srpm creates 2 (or more) subpackages
- The two packages don't depend on each other, and can be installed
seperately or together
- However if the versions of the two package differ, something
nasty could occur
- Ask epiphany maintainer to support Provides: epiphany(abi) = 2.22,
for example.
And them make the extension Requires: epiphany(abi) = 2.22? What's the
advantage over Requires: epiphany = 2.22?
It won't work for ephiphany minor release bump (i.e. 2.22.3, for example)
For example ruby has Provides: ruby(abi) = 1.8 while the current
ruby version (on Fedora) is 1.8.6(.287)
(and actually I think if epiphany changes the extension every time
its major/middle version changes, epiphany should provide such
information to rpm, like ruby, python or so actually do)
(In reply to comment #14)
Also, as some packages already use %_libdir/epiphany//extensions,
making every package use this directory own this directory cannot be
accepted and the owner of this directory must be unified.
Why? We have a couple of these situations whenever one package does not
necessarily depend on the other. Duplicate ownership of a dir is bad, but
unowned dirs are even worse.
But they all depend on epiphany.
So I am asking you to ask epiphany maintainer first (as I did to
vim maintainer). It is not desired that no one using that
directory tries to argue with epiphany maintainer and gets satisfied with
his/her local hack.
KDE has kde-filesystem, font packages got to use fontpackages-filesystem
and so on. Please contact with epiphany maintainer first.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450539] Review Request: service-discovery-applet - Service discovery applet based on Avahi for the Gnome panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450539 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(t...@niemueller.de | |) | --- Comment #11 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2009-01-12 13:34:18 EDT --- I'm currently short in time. I still think the service-discovery-applet should be in Fedora. My time constraints (thesis) will not allow me to do this before March though. Either we wait or someone else takes over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-01-12 13:32:08 EDT --- I see you have updated the SPEC SRPM. This plugin should be named purple-msn-pecan instead of pidgin-msn-pecan, since it's a plugin for libpurple (not pidgin); also other existing libpurple plugins have been named in a similar fashion: purple-facebookchat.x86_64 : Libpurple plug-in supporting facebook IM purple-microblog.x86_64 : Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473723] Review Request: perl-Eval-Context - Evaluate perl code in context wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473723 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-01-12 13:44:10 EDT --- That's not picky at all :) The failing test is one using Test::Perl::Critic -- it tests _how_ you code, not if the code works or not, so it's OK to exclude along the lines of Test::Kwalitee, Test::Pod::Coverage, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479730] New: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available Alias: perl-DateTimeX-Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479730 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTimeX-Easy - Parse a date/time string using the best method available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTimeX-Easy OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTimeX-Easy.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.085-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: DateTimeX::Easy makes DateTime object creation quick and easy. It uses a variety of DateTime::Format packages to do the bulk of the parsing, with some custom tweaks to smooth out the rough edges (mainly concerning timezone detection and selection). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-12 13:57:48 EDT --- I got it to build, but it's the ugly mv in %install method. Bleah. Imported and build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-12 14:05:14 EDT --- chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chipmunk-4.1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479732] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479732 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized - parameterized roles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Role-Parameterized OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Roles are composable units of behavior. They are useful for factoring out functionality common to many classes from any part of your class hierarchy. (See Moose::Cookbook::Roles::Recipe1 for an introduction to Moose::Role.) While combining roles affords you a great deal of flexibility, individual roles have very little in the way of configurability. Core Moose provides alias for renaming methods to avoid conflicts, and excludes for ignoring methods you don't want or need (see Moose::Cookbook::Roles::Recipe2 for more about alias and excludes). Because roles serve many different masters, they usually provide only the least common denominator of functionality. To empower roles further, more configurability than alias and excludes is required. Perhaps your role needs to know which method to call when it is done. Or what default value to use for its url attribute. Parameterized roles offer exactly this solution. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #2 from Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com 2009-01-12 14:16:18 EDT --- httpd is required for ownership of /etc/httpd/conf.d. If that can be made more generic, I'd be all for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 14:11:33
EDT ---
- rpmlint output
celt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Just move (or duplicate) the README and TODO files into the
-devel subpackage.
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
? license matches the actual package license
There's a number of source files (both *.c and *.h) that
don't contain explicit license information. Are we sure
about the origin of these files?
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
dd7cda953e4df448083b69af9afc15e1 401008
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
x86_64
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047518
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047518
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
--
So there's that %doc thing to fix, and can you query upstream
about the libcelt/*.[ch] files which don't have license information
to find out who wrote them and/or where they came from.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 seth vidal svi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||svi...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 14:11:42 EDT --- rpmlint checks out package passes all MUST requirements from review checks Does it REALLY require httpd - or does it only require 'webserver'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479055] Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 Gabriel Somlo so...@cmu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo so...@cmu.edu 2009-01-12 14:14:02 EDT --- successfully built and submitted for stable (forgot to add -b 479055 to bodhi) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479056] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authorization-ACL - ACL Support for Catalyst Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479056 Bug 479056 depends on bug 479055, which changed state. Bug 479055 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Throwable - A minimal lightweight exception class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479055 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-12 14:33:58 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478942] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class - A storage class for Catalyst Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-12 14:34:07 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 seth vidal svi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|svi...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #12 from Edouard Bourguignon edouard.bourguig...@oxalya.com 2009-01-12 14:41:46 EDT --- Ok I will change that. thanks for the info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #14 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 14:51:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328778) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328778) mail from legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-12 14:48:28 EDT --- Any chance you want to work with the maintainer of xmoto to get xmoto 0.5 to use the system chipmunk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Katz ka...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 14:50:54 EDT --- The other comment I have from a quick look is that the %define at the top for the make really probably should just be explicitly in the %build section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #13 from Marek Mahut mma...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 14:49:28 EDT --- Jochen, Cleared issue with legal team, we are good to go, I'll attach mail from legal later. http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/megaupload-dl/megaupload-dl-0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474149] Review Request: chipmunk - A rigid body physics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474149 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-12 14:52:29 EDT --- Just kidding, it appears you are the xmoto maintainer. Good job :D. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: pidgin-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #13 from Edouard Bourguignon edouard.bourguig...@oxalya.com 2009-01-12 14:52:46 EDT --- So here are the new files: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan.spec http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
