[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #29 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 03:08:32 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka， I have uploaded iptux-0.4.5-rc4. I hope you can try to build it again. Thank you very much! Because my campus network is too bad, I can not connect most of all websites including Fedora. As a matter of fact, I have built This package for a few days. When I went home, I am able to upload my files. The author says that iptux-0.4.5 will released soon. At that time, I will build a RPM package just now! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487818] Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 03:17:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 03:17:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487808] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 03:17:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-01 03:22:39 EDT --- No reponse, I close this bug to allow anynody else to submit this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-01 03:23:29 EDT --- No reponse, I close this bug to allow anynody else to submit this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 Bug 438810 depends on bug 438806, which changed state. Bug 438806 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-01 03:23:50 EDT --- No reponse, I close this bug to allow anynody else to submit this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-01 03:23:02 EDT --- No reponse, I close this bug to allow anynody else to submit this package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487617] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 03:29:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 03:37:31 EDT --- Ping! Any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483868] Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 03:52:35 EDT --- Ping, Dominik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 03:53:11 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487901] Review Request: zikula - web-based CMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487901 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|her...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 05:44:54 EDT --- diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-01 05:16:26 EDT --- Good news. Got a reply from upstream, answering both my concerns. They'll do a new release once the levels from the competition are done. Hopefully, they'll include the license file there. I'm including the DVD license text for now, which sufficiently clarifies the situation with logo as well. New package (just added the license, lot of comments to clarify and fixed version in accordance to what I was told by upstream): SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yofrankie-bge.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yofrankie-bge-1.4-0.1.20081221svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-01 06:06:34 EDT --- Uploading not complete yet. Slow link, rsyncin' will finish in an hour or two; Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483868] Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net
2009-03-01 06:02:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Remarks:
* No idea what is AVASYS Public License (rpmlint also shouts that it doesn't
know what is it), however it looks like Distributable, No Modifications
Permitted.
Fixed.
* I found that there are different versions of AVASYS Public License - dated
as
2008-04-01 and as 2005-04.01.
They're almost identical. The only change is s/EPSON AVASYS/AVASYS/g.
Still, included.
* There is also another one license, named LICENSE.EPSON.{en,ja}.txt.
Included.
* Missing BR: udev ( rpm -qf /lib/firmware )
It's not necessary for building, but indeed it should be required for
installation to ensure that /lib/firmware is present before installation.
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/iscan-firmware.spec
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/iscan-firmware-2.16.0-2.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487913] New: Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Summary: Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan...@cs.technion.ac.il QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/culmus-fancy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~danken/culmus-fancy-fonts-0.20051122-6.fc11.src.rpm Description: The culmus-fancy-fonts package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh. due to bug 477387 and bug 477387 comment 5, I need to rename fonts-hebrew-fancy to this package so it fits F11's font packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 --- Comment #1 from Dan Kenigsberg dan...@cs.technion.ac.il 2009-03-01 06:37:53 EDT --- darn: ... and bug 173897 comment 6 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 07:23:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: couchdb Short Description: A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Bug 479527 depends on bug 428567, which changed state. Bug 428567 Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Bug 428568 depends on bug 428567, which changed state. Bug 428567 Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #74 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-01 07:32:17 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for good review and CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 06:10:17
EDT ---
REVIEW:
+/- rpmlint is not silent. However, all these messages already mentioned above
and have been explained.
[pe...@sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint couchdb-*
couchdb.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/couchdb couchdb
couchdb.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/couchdb couchdb
couchdb.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/couchdb couchdb
couchdb.ppc: E: devel-dependency libicu-devel
couchdb.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency libicu-devel
couchdb.ppc: E: invalid-soname
/usr/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/couch-0.8.1-incubating/priv/lib/couch_erl_driver.so
couch_erl_driver.so
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings.
[pe...@sulaco ppc]
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/couchdb/0.8.1-incubating/apache-couchdb-0.8.1-incubating.tar.gz.md5
-q -O - md5sum apache-couchdb-0.8.1-incubating.tar.gz
89e037b370bef33be93f0f317e07615f apache-couchdb-0.8.1-incubating.tar.gz
89e037b370bef33be93f0f317e07615f apache-couchdb-0.8.1-incubating.tar.gz
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all primary
architectures:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1210362
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ No need to handle locales.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ No large documentation files.
+ Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ No c-header files.
+ No static libraries.
+ No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ No library files with a suffix.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
+ Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
I've got only one final advise - another one fix for already mentioned above
sed one-liner :). Instead of current's:
sed -i
's/\%{_localstatedir}\/run\/couchdb.pid/\%{_localstatedir}\/run\/couchdb\/couchdb.pid/g'
\
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/couchdb
It should looks like:
sed -i
's/\/var\/run\/couchdb.pid/\%{_localstatedir}\/run\/couchdb\/couchdb.pid/g' \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/default/couchdb
Note - I changed only the latter mentioning of /var.
Please, consider adding this final change, and this package is
= APPROVED =
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-01 08:59:31 EDT --- yofrankie-bge.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4-0.2.20081221svn 1.4-0.1.20081221svn The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I've messed it up again. I'll fix on next package spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 09:33:58 EDT --- This one is now accepted. -- This package (rtaudio) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483868] Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 09:49:55
EDT ---
REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is silent
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum `ls iscan-plugin-gt-*|sort`
ed12335648c893eda194afee38e51351 iscan-plugin-gt-1500-2.1.0-2.c2.i386.rpm
ed12335648c893eda194afee38e51351
iscan-plugin-gt-1500-2.1.0-2.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
f76725766f44debe3f3fec06d0e2023b iscan-plugin-gt-9400-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
f76725766f44debe3f3fec06d0e2023b
iscan-plugin-gt-9400-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
8b1c398ef58769d9ceb77ad771515de3 iscan-plugin-gt-f500-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
8b1c398ef58769d9ceb77ad771515de3
iscan-plugin-gt-f500-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
b72a512a927b9f2020af817c5a541ae8 iscan-plugin-gt-f520-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
b72a512a927b9f2020af817c5a541ae8
iscan-plugin-gt-f520-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
5f4137fd69198617b95bd59261affd75 iscan-plugin-gt-f600-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
5f4137fd69198617b95bd59261affd75
iscan-plugin-gt-f600-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
bb623b47fd457e94f8d6b878b5d9ad99 iscan-plugin-gt-f670-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
bb623b47fd457e94f8d6b878b5d9ad99
iscan-plugin-gt-f670-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
cf191e84b03b28a8b0f629d60ba0b36e iscan-plugin-gt-f700-2.0.0-0.c2.i386.rpm
cf191e84b03b28a8b0f629d60ba0b36e
iscan-plugin-gt-f700-2.0.0-0.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
bda9d1dfe5c9524084b01e46a7a9f5e3 iscan-plugin-gt-s600-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
bda9d1dfe5c9524084b01e46a7a9f5e3
iscan-plugin-gt-s600-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
02c151a49608ae911b1e200672ed236f iscan-plugin-gt-x750-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
02c151a49608ae911b1e200672ed236f
iscan-plugin-gt-x750-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
c33515ec3e57eed680cd599452141d45 iscan-plugin-gt-x770-2.1.0-1.c2.i386.rpm
c33515ec3e57eed680cd599452141d45
iscan-plugin-gt-x770-2.1.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1210911
+ No additional build dependencies.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not contain any duplicate files.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ No large documentation files.
+ Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ No header files.
+ No static libraries.
+ No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ No libraries files with a suffix.
+ No .la libtool archives.
+ Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25]
+ All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8.
This package is
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 09:59:09 EDT --- Assigning to myself. I will try full review once the dependency rpms are imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(alexes...@yahoo.c ||om) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 10:31:17 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|panem...@gmail.com | --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 10:38:33 EDT --- Its almost one month and I see no updates here. Removing myself from this review so that any other reviewer can pick this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487938] New: Review Request: scheme2js - Scheme to JavaScript compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scheme2js - Scheme to JavaScript compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487938 Summary: Review Request: scheme2js - Scheme to JavaScript compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.syl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/scheme2js.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/scheme2js-20081219-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Scheme2Js is a Scheme to JavaScript compiler distributed under the GPL license. While some effort has been spent on being as close as possible to R5RS, we concentrated mainly on efficiency. Usually Scheme2Js produces JavaScript code, that is comparable to hand-written code. In order to achieve this performance, Scheme2Js is not completely R5RS compliant. In particular it lacks exact numbers. Scheme2Js is not yet complete either: it lacks hygienic macros and the eval procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 10:56:50 EDT --- - Please rebuild also on F-9 - And for F-10 F-9, please submit requests to push the rebuilt packages into repositories on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(br...@gnoll.org) --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:00:22 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(stu...@gathman.or ||g) --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:00:49 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:01:45 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:28:27 EDT --- again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(maintai...@mt2009 ||.com) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:27:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject ||.org) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:27:15 EDT --- Any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 11:36:23 EDT --- weka-3.6.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/weka-3.6.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 11:37:01 EDT --- weka-3.6.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/weka-3.6.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 11:54:00 EDT --- Thank you for the review Mamoru. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rtaudio Short Description: Real-time Audio I/O Library Owners: oget Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:55:52 EDT --- ... You seem to have reverted all changes you did previously to fix the issues I pointed out on comment 20. You also removed some %changelog entry. Please restore them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486044] Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486044 Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com 2009-03-01 12:17:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Two of the tests are badly written and fail. There is no problem with the functionality of the package. This should be reported upstream Reported php-pear(PEAR) should be removed from Requires as already required by php-pear(XML_Parser) and php-pear(XML_Util) I will remove this after the import. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-Config Short Description: Configuration file manipulation for PHP Owners: bjohnson Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Depends on||487957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Patrick Dignan dignan.patr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm | |ail.com)| --- Comment #16 from Patrick Dignan dignan.patr...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 13:35:43 EDT --- Sorry, finishing up classes here, I'm going to be on break after this week, so I expect to have this finished during my time off. Do you have any comments on what I should do about the config files as described in my comment above? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com 2009-03-01 16:05:44 EDT --- I've gone ahead and given you the ACLs as comaintainer. I'll do the initial builds though and fix up the missing deps. (Not completely sure about the sox dep - I think I might put a patch in the spec file and require alsa-utils instead. Or instead of patching make the reinteract upstream search the path for aplay/play.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #7 from Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com 2009-03-01 16:09:13 EDT --- Oh, yeah, should note here the discussion we had on the google group about RHEL 5 http://groups.google.com/group/reinteract/browse_thread/thread/e9a9903e2f94214d Basic conclusion: old Python and GTK+ means that significant work would have to be done upstream to keep compatibility with EL-5, and it's probably not worth it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(fed...@christoph- | |wickert.de) | --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-03-01 16:28:26 EDT --- Weird, IIRC i tested it. Anyway: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmusic-0.2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmusic.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 16:45:05 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-01 16:54:55 EDT --- uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487973] New: Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Summary: Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmenu-data.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxmenu-data-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The lxmenu-data contains files used to build the menu in LXDE according to the freedesktop-org menu spec. Currently it's used by LXPanel and LXLauncher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #17 from Dale Bewley d...@bewley.net 2009-03-01 17:13:31 EDT --- I think checking the hardcoded paths in the configs is a good idea. I found 78 executables in jk_init.ini and did a quick check on one system. I didn't have all those packages installed, but most paths seem right. I know at least a couple are wrong, vi, nice, xauth... # for f in `grep bin jk_init.ini |sed -e 's/^executables = //' -e 's/,/\n/g' -e 's/ //g' -e 's/^#.*//'|sort -u `; do ls $f; done|grep 'No such' ls: cannot access /bin/uncompress: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usb/bin/joe: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usb/bin/whoami: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/lynx: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/mc: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/mcedit: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/mcview: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/nice: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/sort: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/vi: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/X11/xauth: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/bin/Xrealvnc: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/sbin/apache: No such file or directory ls: cannot access /usr/sbin/jk_lsh: No such file or directory If you put your latest changes online, I can probably find the time to finish it up pretty soon if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||xja...@fi.muni.cz AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|xja...@fi.muni.cz Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Sebastian Vahl fed...@deadbabylon.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Vahl fed...@deadbabylon.de 2009-03-01 17:57:18 EDT --- I'll doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487978] New: Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 Summary: Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sqlitebrowser/sqlitebrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sqlitebrowser/sqlitebrowser-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SQLite Database Browser is a freeware, public domain, open source visual tool used to create, design and edit database files compatible with SQLite. It is meant to be used for users and developers that want to create databases, edit and search data using a familiar spreadsheet-like interface, without the need to learn complicated SQL commands. Controls and wizards are available for users to: * Create and compact database files * Create, define, modify and delete tables * Create, define and delete indexes * Browse, edit, add and delete records * Search records * Import and export records as text * Import and export tables from/to CSV files * Import and export databases from/to SQL dump files * Issue SQL queries and inspect the results * Examine a log of all SQL commands issued by the application --- koji scratch build dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1211927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #20 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-03-01 18:31:18 EDT --- Thanks everyone. Packages build Except for EL-5, as it seems fuse is not enabled for EL-5 (though the package exists in EL-5, apparently there is no kernel support and therefor userland is not build, and our build fails with a missing fuse-devel dependancy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.syl...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 18:55:46 EDT --- Looks like this is already in Rawhide and F-10 stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Bug 467414 depends on bug 467403, which changed state. Bug 467403 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467414 depends on bug 467410, which changed state. Bug 467410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Bug 467418 depends on bug 467403, which changed state. Bug 467403 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467418 depends on bug 467405, which changed state. Bug 467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 467418 depends on bug 467410, which changed state. Bug 467410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-01 19:23:12
EDT ---
Apologies for the slow response - somehow missed your updates in my bugzilla
folder last week.
Thanks for the update. Here is my review:
+:ok, !:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output
rpmlint is now clean. :)
[*] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[!] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
The license is MIT not BSD!
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
6bcb3d6a9f31eddd69aac5df3b50dd98 fedora-setup-keyboard-0.3.tar.bz2
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[no shared libs]
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[no devel files]
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1212001
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
Please be sure to fix the License field before importing and
the package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||wo...@nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-03-01 19:51:39 EDT --- Please, first of all, make the package build in current rawhide, the package doesn't build with gcc 4.4 (this has nothing to do with the ppc64 debuginfo failure): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1212023 (hopefully it will be enough to add the necessary headers, if you don't know what to do, just tell me) I'll then try to narrow the ppc64 debuginfo issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-01 20:56:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ghc-haskell-src-exts Short Description: Library for Manipulating Haskell source Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #56 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroubl...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 22:22:06 EDT --- Update using said patch with one modification, i like the Summary as it was before. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #18 from Patrick Dignan dignan.patr...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 22:22:27 EDT --- http://users.wpi.edu/~dignan/archive/jailkit/2.5-3/jailkit.spec Here's the latest specfile, hopefully you can have some luck with it, I'm not sure yet whether we should require all the packages listed in the default config or what, but I definitely think we should use sed to replace the binary locations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 22:29:09 EDT --- Ok. I will be in CC list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 22:31:35 EDT --- any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com 2009-03-01 22:54:57 EDT --- Ok, passes RPMLINT and is the new version. I approve. Ready for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #31 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-03-01 23:25:46 EDT --- en...I will do it. Can it be built in mock or koji？？ I am not author. The real author says that he has fixed the bug. So the patch was not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-02 00:18:04 EDT --- Yes, rc4 compiles on i586, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 (BR: gettext needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomp - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Suravee Suthikulpanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.c ||om --- Comment #1 from Suravee Suthikulpanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com 2009-03-02 00:28:17 EDT --- This is an unofficial review: - md5sum verification: Match the upstream tarball 825464302989bb1dddf0badf114b4b94 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/stomper-0.2.2.tar.gz - RPMLINT output. Please clarify the warnings below # rpmlint -iv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/python-stomp-0.2.2-2.fc9.noarch.rpm python-stomp.noarch: I: checking python-stomp.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-stomp-0.2.2/tests/.___init__.py The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-stomp.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-stomp-0.2.2/examples/._stomper_usage.py The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-stomp.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-stomp-0.2.2/doc/.___init__.py The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-stomp.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-stomp-0.2.2/examples/.___init__.py The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #10 from Suravee Suthikulpanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com 2009-03-02 00:29:46 EDT --- Help review Bug 487007 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488010] Package Review: ibus-table-cangjie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||484650 Depends on|484650 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488010] New: Package Review: ibus-table-cangjie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-cangjie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 Summary: Package Review: ibus-table-cangjie Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ccha...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, ccha...@redhat.com, phu...@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Depends on: 484650 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 484650 A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. Uploading srpm and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@deadbabylon.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com 2009-03-02 01:16:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333684) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333684) Just a test please ignore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #9 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2009-03-02 02:19:30 EDT --- Please be sure to fix the License field before importing and the package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. Fixed in 0.3-2, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Adel Gadllah adel.gadl...@gmail.com 2009-03-02 02:21:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fedora-setup-keyboard Short Description: Hal keyboard layout callout Owners: drago01, whot Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
