[Bug 453849] Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 02:39:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I've just done a full review, basicly the same issues as with globus-core: MUST FIX * Add s390x as 64 bit arch * Since this is for devel use only, drop the -devel subpackage and put all %files in main package * Document Source# origin I guess the same goes for a lot of the other globus-packages it would be good if you could do an update of those too. Your 1st and 3rd point are trival (and I had already fixed them in my private copy after your comments to globus-core but not uploaded a new version yet). The 2nd point I think is a misunderstanding. The main subpackage is not a devel package. It is there to satisfy a runtime dependency, not a build dependency. The globus-libtool and globus-openssl packages are what I call GPT glue packages. They provide the GPT metadata files for packages already in the distribution (libtool-ltdt and openssl), so that the packages in the distribution can be used instead of duplicating them - which would violate the packaging guidelines. As the packages they replace they have a main and a devel subpackage (globus-openssl even has a utils subpackage to split off the dependency on the openssl binaries from the openssl libraries - which the GPT package does but Fedora package does not do). If someone installs the binary globus packages and the grid-packaging-tools package and uses gpt to examine the installed packages the user will get a complaint about missing packages if the GPT metadata from the main package is missing, but this user has no need for neither the GPT metadata from the devel subpackage nor of the dependencies it drags in. Also, all the RPM package dependencies in the specfiles for the globus packages are autogenerated from the GPT source package metadata. Packages that require the libltdl runtime libraries will therefore depend on globus-libtool rather than libltdl directly and get the libltdl library dependency from the globus-libtool glue package. In this way the necessary GPT package descriptions are there if someone uses gpt to verify the installation as above, and the RPM dependency generation is kept simple. Merging devel with main in this package would spoil the clear separation between development and runtime libraries and make a binary only installation depend on development packages in the distribution and drag in unnecessary dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 03:06:29 EDT --- Unfortunately, initial reporter has some issues with logging in to Bugzilla and has no interest in solving them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG AssignedTo|lemen...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 03:24:55 EDT --- Seems, that initial reporter lost interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xav...@bachelot.org Summary|Firebird SQL database |Review Request: firebird - |management system |Firebird SQL database ||management system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490317] New: Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 Summary: Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rumor.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rumor-1.0.3b-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Rumor is a realtime monophonic (with chords) MIDI keyboard to Lilypond converter. It receives MIDI events, quantizes them according to its metronome on the fly and outputs handwritten-like corresponding Lilypond notation. Tempo, meter, key and other parameters can be set via command-line options. rpmlint is silent Koji F-11 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1241995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] New: Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Summary: Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frescobaldi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frescobaldi-0.7.7-1.src.rpm Description: Frescobaldi is a LilyPond sheet music editor for KDE4. It aims to be powerful, yet lightweight and easy to use. It features: * Enter LilyPond scores, build and preview them with a mouseclick * Point-and-click support: click on notes or error messages to jump to the correct position * A powerful Score Wizard to quickly setup a musical score * Editing tools to: o manipulate the rhythm o hyphenate lyrics o quickly enter or add articulations and other symbols to existing music o run the document through convert-ly to update it to a newer LilyPond version * Context sensitive autocomplete, helping you to quickly enter LilyPond commands * Expansion manager to enter larger snippets of LilyPond input using short mnemonics * A powerful Rumor plugin, using the Rumor program to quickly enter music by playing it on a MIDI keyboard or even your computer keyboard * Built-in comprehensive User Guide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 --- Comment #14 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 05:58:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Ok, so I see now reviewing other globus packages that quite a few are for devel use only. No, globus-core is the only one. I think that doing empty main packages for all those is a bad idea, in retrospect it was a bad idea for this one too. It seemed like a clever trick, but it contradicts Fedora's normal way of handling this, which is if a package has only development use, its ok to have files which would normally be part of a -devel package in the main package. So please drop the devel from the %files list and remove the -devel subpackage, that will also yield a nice simplification (lines reduction) of the spec file. New iteration implementing this request available here: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-core-5.15-0.5.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 06:05:43 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-xmpp New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jcollie peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 leigh scott leigh123li...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-15 06:34:25 EDT --- If all the plugin libraries (and specifically their library SONAME values) were renamed to put them into a namespace that is much more specific to this application, that would make it unnecessary to filter rpmbuild's automatic Provides/Requires. The risk that any other library package would introduce a shared library with a SONAME like libbnirc_plugin_SOMETHING.so.0 would be very low. And as such I would approve that as a valid work-around. [...] Here's a run-time error: RegisterTab called added python tab hook Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/bnIRC-1.1.1/scripts/toc.py, line 15, in module import whrandom ImportError : No module named whrandom script error! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 07:24:14 EDT --- Merging additional review block from comment #1 OK source files match upstream(double checked): 778ecbaf87bc3fe56df210841a80aa83eb64b78a26c4bd0079143705a1301be9 CGI-Application-4.21.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged (not mandatory). OK BuildRequires are proper and match PERL packaging Guideline. OK Build framework is used and correctly BR'ed. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in koji (Rawhide, f-10). OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look good. OK %check is present and all tests pass. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. That package is good for FPC. *APPROVED* Please, follow those steps below before request CVS branch and sponsorship. Sponsorship: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Once you get approved as a Fedora packager go to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests I'd also like that you start review a couple of packages Review Requests to track down your skills and your understanding in Fedora rpm packaging's way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fe...@fetzig.org Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-03-15 07:29:29 EDT --- As you now don't seem to need a sponsor anymore I'll be able to take the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478432] Review Request: dwscan - Displays access point information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478432 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-03-15 10:37:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I'm guessing that Ralf's concern was that the program needs privilege to run and so should be installed in /usr/sbin. Of course, the current default path kind of eliminates the difference, but upstream seems to agree. Do you have any thoughts on this? I will leave the path untouched. The software seems confused about its license. The actual program clearly indicates LGPLv2 (only) but COPYING and the included spec say GPLv2. The software itself overrides, of course, but then I don't see the value in packaging the useless COPYING file. Could you ping upstream and see if you can get them to clarify? COPYING removed and LGPLv2 added as license tag for now till upstream release a new source tarball. X license field does not match the actual license. LGPLv2 for now. X BuildRequires fixed Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/dwscan-0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613
--- Comment #4 from Jim Radford radf...@blackbean.org 2009-03-15 10:55:04
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
- If packaging Emacs modes, you might want to consider making a separate
subpackage that depends on emacs. See for instance how I handle it for
vala:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/vala/vala.spec?revision=1.36
I think this is overkill for small files (like .el files). Plus, I can't
picture wanting emacs installed because I installed ledger.
Sure, you don't want to get emacs pulled in by default. Which is why I
suggested splitting off the emacs editing modes; this is the convention for
other packages that come with emacs modes; see e.g.
Let's just say I have emacs installed and I use it, and I hear about ledger, so
I install it (yum install ledger) and start playing around with it. I open a
few ledger text files, but no emacs mode is auto-detected. I probably wouldn't
even know a ledger mode exists because some packager didn't bother to install a
single text file. User cost: lack of a full experience, User gain: 4k disk
savings and no dangling directory.
Let's say we did include a the el files. The user always gets the full access
to ledger mode. User benefit: satisfaction, User cost: 4k disk usage and a
dangling directory.
As far as I'm concerned the dangling directory is a tool bug/wart and should be
treated as such. Same with not being able to automatically install
emacs-ledger if someone installs ledger and emacs. Another tool bug. Without
these being fixed, there is a *clear* choice that make the user's life better
with *very* little cost.
emacs-{gambit,git,gnuplot,lua,mercurial,pyrex,vala}). All of these are split
off from their main packages, so that the main package itself does not depend
on Emacs.
I think these should be fixed as well. The emacs-git situation is totally
uncalled for. vc-git should just work out of the box if I yum install git.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com 2009-03-15 11:25:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Let me know what you think on these items, and then I'll push out a new upstream release and post a new spec/srpm. Can we have a fresh Spec/SRPM pair? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-15 11:32:01 EDT --- libkml-0.6.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libkml-0.6.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 11:51:11 EDT --- I forgot to add the rpmlint output: frescobaldi.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/frescobaldi/common ../common This is false alarm since the symlink points to an existing location (/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common is owned in the dependency chain). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490352] New: Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Summary: Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beol...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SPECS/emacs-cedet.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SRPMS/emacs-cedet-1.0pre4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CEDET is a Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools written with the end goal of creating an advanced development environment in Emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490354] New: Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Summary: Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beol...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SPECS/emacs-elib.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SRPMS/emacs-elib-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Elib, the GNU Emacs lisp library, is a collection of elisp functions which you can use as parts of your own elisp programs. Each file contains functions which have something in common, e.g. they handle a certain data type. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490353] New: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490353 Summary: Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beol...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SPECS/emacs-ecb.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SRPMS/emacs-ecb-2.32-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ECB stands for Emacs Code Browser. While Emacs already has good editing support for many modes, its browsing support is somewhat lacking. That's where ECB comes in: it displays a number of informational windows that allow for easy source code navigation and overview. (!)Requires: emacs-cedet -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490355] New: Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 Summary: Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: beol...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SPECS/emacs-jde.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.sgu.ru/b/SRPMS/emacs-jde-2.3.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JDEE, an add-on software package that turns Emacs into a comprehensive system for creating, editing, debugging, and documenting Java applications. (!)Requires: emacs-cedet -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352#c0 emacs-elib -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354#c0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 Bug 226381 depends on bug 489990, which changed state. Bug 489990 Summary: Aliasing breakage causes unexpected behavior when compiled with gcc44 -O2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489990 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 13:57:10 EDT --- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Pavel Stalwart Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com - 0.9-3 - Fixed debuginfo generation Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/slock.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/slock-0.9-3.fc10.src.rpm Built RPMs for F10 i386 and x86_64: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #5 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr 2009-03-15 14:10:51 EDT --- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-1 - version 10429 http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-1.fc10.src.rpm About the BuildRequires, they are just taken verbatim from the source install page: http://springlobby.info/wiki/springlobby/InstallFromSource I guessed if upstream mentioned them, I should add them too. Do you think I should remove them ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ianwel...@gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 14:13:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I guessed if upstream mentioned them, I should add them too. Do you think I should remove them ? yes :) if things don't work, testing can make that more obvious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #9 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr 2009-03-15 14:23:16 EDT --- It does not contains any license at all. Does upstream state anywhere that it is GPLv2+? It used to be in the debian/copyright file in the previous tarball. Debian-specific information has been removed from this new tarball, so this file was dropped too. I asked the author to add a COPYING file to the next release. It carries a copy of camlzip library. It should be patched to system version of it (package called ocaml-zip). I agree, but it requires ocaml-zip version 1.04, and we only have 1.03 in Fedora 10. Can I delay the patching until F11 is out ? Site in URL seem don't have any relation to spring-installer itself. Well, caspring.org is not directly related either, but it's better indeed. I'll update the tag. Debuginfo package looks incomplete. Can it carry anything useful for ocaml programs? May be it should be disabled? What makes you say that ? (I am not familiar with ocaml). The OCaml packaging guidelines don't say anything about debuginfo packages, so I'd rather leave it this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490352] Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490353] Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490353 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-15 14:33:31 EDT --- You can set the ticket dependency fields to make sure that reviewers see the tickets in order. Are these your first pacakges for Fedora? I can't do a meaningful search for Dan in the account system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490352] Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(lokth...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-15 14:36:59 EDT --- No point in having an open review ticket when there's nobody submitting a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490352, 490354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(felix.schw...@oss ||.schwarz.eu) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-15 14:45:28 EDT --- The package seems pretty nice and clean. However: 1. your fontconfig file references the sans generic but fontconfig people seem to prefer sans-serif 2. please update the associated wiki page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist as demanded by our font packaging workflow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 --- Comment #2 from Dan Atmakin beol...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 14:47:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) You can set the ticket dependency fields to make sure that reviewers see the tickets in order. Are these your first pacakges for Fedora? I can't do a meaningful search for Dan in the account system. Thanks for hints. Yes, it's my first packages for Fedora. I changed real name, hope it will be unique. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490352] Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490353] Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490353 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #15 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-03-15 15:02:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) A few comments: I do not find dbus-python-devel a BuildRequires either. Anyway. Otherwise a mock build on x86 will fail with this error message: checking for python module dbus... no configure: error: Could not find Python module dbus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771
Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|ianwel...@gmail.com |atork...@gmail.com
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 15:03:38
EDT ---
Here goes the review:
+ rpmlint output without errors
spring-maps-default.noarch: W: no-documentation
spring-maps-default.src: W: no-%build-section
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Empty build section could be added.
+ The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ Source package does not includes the text of the license(s) in its own file.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one primary architecture.
+ If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
Bugs should be filled against all 4 spring packages after their acceptance and
added to FE-ExcludeArch-ppc{,64} tracker:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ No need to deal with locales.
+ The package does not designed to be relocatable.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ A package does not list a file more than once in %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ Package consistently uses macros.
+ Does not have documentation.
+ Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
While this package is APPROVED, cvs creation should be delayed until all four
spring packages are accepted.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 15:09:31 EDT --- woo less work for me, thanks Alexey :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #10 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 15:13:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) It does not contains any license at all. Does upstream state anywhere that it is GPLv2+? It used to be in the debian/copyright file in the previous tarball. Debian-specific information has been removed from this new tarball, so this file was dropped too. I asked the author to add a COPYING file to the next release. Having COPYING file in tarball does not guarantee that sources are GPL. Plus it does not specify what version of GPL it is. He should have some README there telling This sources are GPL v2 or later or something like that. Best, if he includes standard header within comments to every file. It carries a copy of camlzip library. It should be patched to system version of it (package called ocaml-zip). I agree, but it requires ocaml-zip version 1.04, and we only have 1.03 in Fedora 10. Can I delay the patching until F11 is out ? Hmm, we don't have ocaml-zip-1.04 in rawhide either. Could you file a bug against ocaml-zip asking him to update? Debuginfo package looks incomplete. Can it carry anything useful for ocaml programs? May be it should be disabled? What makes you say that ? (I am not familiar with ocaml). The OCaml packaging guidelines don't say anything about debuginfo packages, so I'd rather leave it this way. There is no Ocaml sources in debuginfo. That means it's impossible to debug it. Though, may be, it is possible to get backtraces. So, ok, lets leave it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 15:36:53 EDT --- The sources contain some files that are GPLv3+ in settings++ and base64.cpp that is LGPLv3. But your License tag is GPLv2 (without plus). If upstream really wants to distribute it under second version of GPL there is license incompatibility. But perhaps, there is simple error. If so, change License tag to GPLv3. Remove ChangeLog from %doc too. It doesn't have any relation to this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #34 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-03-15 15:50:20 EDT --- @Orcan, thank you for your help. Unfortunately, bodhi let not allow me to mark the pacage as stable, if the update was pushed by a comaintainer. So it may be nice, if you can take over this task. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #30 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 16:13:01 EDT --- Few notes about licensing: - AI/Global/RAI/README saying that AI is licensed under GPLv3+. It build as shared library, so it should be added to license tag. - License for some sounds is LGPLv2 as taken from bzflag. - License for some graphics is GFDL and (GFDL or CC-BY). See installer/builddata/bitmaps/README.txt. There should be added to license tag along with explanatory comment. It must use system version of fonts. - Luxi.ttf is non-free and must be replaced. - Vera.ttf should be symlinked to Dejavu fonts as they are improved version of Vera. (Add dejavu fonts added as requires). Unfortunately, it includes patched version of Lua that would be incompatible with system one. Perhaps, this should be addressed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|atork...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 17:08:39 EDT --- - Replace two seds with a patch. It will be easier to read. Moreover, if upstream decide to change flags in makefile in future, sed will silently continue with old values and patch will fail. - This is a GUI application, you should create .desktop file for it. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 17:13:52 EDT --- This is NOT a gui application, it's expected to be ran by windowmanager, not user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 17:41:36 EDT --- And there are standard way for window manager to choose locker? How it will know of slock existence? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #8 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr 2009-03-15 17:47:13 EDT --- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.0.1.10429-2 - drop the version in the buildrequires - don't package ChangeLog as %%doc About the licensing, it's probably an error. The website says « License is GPL 2 (free as in freedom) » (http://springlobby.info/wiki/springlobby/FeaturesGoals) http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10429-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489676] Review Request: perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader - Simple XML file reading based on their DTDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489676 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-15 17:51:01 EDT --- Thanks. It boulds now, and looks OK except for one problem: The dependency on XML::Parser is doubled. rpm finds an unversioned dependency by itself, but the spec has a manual versioned one. All supported Fedora releases shipped with XML::Parser 2.36 or later, so there shouldn't be a need for a explicit versioned dependency and you should be able to just drop it. However, if you really want to keep it, you'll need to filter the automatic one. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 00335c6817f7a76c034183b4fc25effae7f00ba0d8ac86ab418f60d2cce4d224 XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(XML::Simple::DTDReader) = 0.04 perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader = 0.04-2.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) X perl(XML::Parser) perl(XML::Parser) = 2.28 perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=20, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.23 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #22 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-03-15 18:28:36 EDT --- Would it be allowed to drop mod_passenger from the package (and thus not use the CNRI licensed code in the package for Fedora)? Could we then continue the review just for rubygem-passenger? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #31 from Aurelien Bompard gau...@free.fr 2009-03-15 18:33:45 EDT --- * Sun Mar 15 2009 Aurelien Bompard abomp...@fedoraproject.org 0.78.2.1-7 - add info about licensing - use system fonts http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489676] Review Request: perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader - Simple XML file reading based on their DTDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489676 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-03-15 18:34:44 EDT --- I've removed the explicit R: from the spec. Fixed package : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04-3.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for the review, Jason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564
--- Comment #16 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-03-15 18:32:50
EDT ---
Hi,
Here is now a more detailed review of Juan's last package with the patch added
by Rajeesh. We've already worked on this package for quite some time to make it
fulfill the requirements, so I've used Juan's package as base.
I've investigated the build problem and it is caused by the following:
Python (similar to perl) uses two directories for vendor specific data:
- %{python_sitearch} (architecture specific, usually shared objects)
- %{python_sitelib} (architecture-independend *.py files)
Since both directories point to the same dir on x86
(/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages) but differ on x86_64 systems
(/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages for noarch and
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages for arch-sepcific files).
This will cause problems if only %{python_sitearch} is used and so they must be
used both - please see my spec file (attached to the bug) and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for details.
The spec file I've attached builds on all architectures in F11. It would be
good to go further using this one. ;-)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1242586
I've changed the build requirements so that it builds and I've changed the
deletion of the *.la and *.a file. Just a hint: even in this case there was no
harm, but if you know, that you only want to delete files with rm, please don't
use the '-r' switch.
Here is a more detailed review (of Juan's package with Rajeesh's patch and my
small modifications of the spec file - it is attached to this bug). Please
note, that I cannot sponsor you, since I'm quite new here, too.
* rpmlint: OK
rpmlint SPECS/blueman.spec RPMS/i386/blueman-1.02-6.fc10.i386.rpm
RPMS/i386/blueman-debuginfo-1.02-6.fc10.i386.rpm
SRPMS/blueman-1.02-6.fc10.src.rpm
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* naming: OK
* spec file name matches %{name}: OK
* License: for the code it seems OK (GPL3 COPYING file, *.c files and a couple
of python files refer to GPLv3+, no direct indication of a different license),
but the svg icons are GPL2.0
* License packaged: OK
* Source0: OK (matches upstream, spectool -g works):
7f66f569a716f8c6fce9360176166eac blueman-1.02.tar.gz
* package builds in F11 on all archs:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1242586
* build requirements: OK
* locale handling: OK, %{find_lang} is used
* ldconfig: OK (n/a, since no libraries in linker's default paths)
* dir ownership: TODO
- since it places files into %{_datadir}/gnome/autostart the package should
require gnome-session which owns this directory
- same applies to %{_datadir}/PolicyKit/policy/org.blueman.policy - PolicyKit
should be required
- the following two entries would cause that /usr/share/blueman would not
have a proper owner:
%{_datadir}/%{name}/icons/hicolor/*
%{_datadir}/%{name}/ui/*.ui
- you have to use %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead (so that all files below
including /usr/share/blueman belong to the package)
* files not listed twice: OK
* file permssions: OK
* rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install and %clean: OK
* macro usage: OK, probably
%{python_sitelib}/blueman
can be changed to
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}
* code vs. content: no content besides some icons
* large docu: OK (n/a)
* %doc: OK
* header files / static libs: OK (n/a)
* pkgconfig files: OK (n/a)
* shared libs: OK (n/a)
* *.la, *.a files: OK (deleted in %install)
* desktop-file: TODO
- update-desktop-database not needed any more
* gtk-update-icon-cache: TODO
- the directories must be touched before gtk-update-icon-cache runs - the
preferred usage is now in Fedora:
%post
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
fi
%posttrans
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor /dev/null || :
* patches: TODO
- since the package contains now an upstream patch, it is necessary to add a
comment about the status of the patch (e.g. was it already committed upstream,
is there a corresponding bug report upstream, etc.) (see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines - All Patches should have
an upstream bug link or commnet)
* compiler flags: OK (rpmoptflags used)
* debuginfo complete: OK
* functional check: TODO
- I did just installed the package and tried to use it, but without much
success. Please can you give me some easy to reproduce use-cases?
- As far as I know bluez-gnome and gnome-bluetooth provide similar
functionality. How do these packages interact? Which are necessary? Are they
mutual exclusive? It would be great if you could give me some insights about
this...
Best regards,
Christian
--
Configure bugmail:
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #17 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-03-15 18:51:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335280) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335280) specfile which fixes the compilation problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] New: Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Summary: Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/qtcreator/qt-creator.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/qtcreator/qt-creator-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Qt Creator (previously known as Project Greenhouse) is a new, lightweight, cross-platform integrated development environment (IDE) designed to make development with the Qt application framework even faster and easier. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1242645 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Shevchuk stl...@gmail.com 2009-03-15 19:13:36 EDT --- Light WMs like openbox and dwm (slock was written for) bound commands, not fd.o .desktop nonsense. How to create static patch for config.mk that will get arch-specific CFLAGS? I think sed expressions are pretty good options for one-line patching - my EFL/E17 specs have plenty of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490318] Review Request: frescobaldi - Edit LilyPond sheet music with ease!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490318 Christian Krause c...@plauener.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-15 19:28:33 EDT --- What's the purpose of the patches: no-docu.diff disable_private_header_check.patch Please document it, in the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-03-15 19:44:12
EDT ---
no-docu.diff should not be needed now that qdoc3 is included in qt-devel. As
for disable_private_header_check.patch, Lukáš Tinkl has a package without it
which apparently builds. So please try building it without these patches.
QTDIR=/usr/lib64/qt4 is not valid (you have to use %{_qt4_prefix} instead,
there's no lib64 on 32-bit platforms) and should not be needed at all.
Stuff getting installed to hardcoded /usr/lib/qtcreator also looks broken to
me. If this is target-specific stuff, it should go to %{_libdir}, not /usr/lib.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:58:29 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-openssl-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453849] Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:57:57 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-libtool-1.2-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-libtool.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:58:51 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-module-0.6-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-openssl-module.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:58:19 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-common-10.2-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-common.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:58:09 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-3.0-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-openssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:01:49 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-ftp-control-2.10-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-ftp-control.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface to stream and datagram st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:01:42 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-io-6.3-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-io.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:58:40 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:00:35 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gss-assist-4.0-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gss-assist.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:01:19 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio-gsi-driver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453849] Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||467235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:00:56 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-2.7-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478918] Review Request: gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:01:06 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/gssapi-error-2.5-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/gssapi-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:00:20 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:02:41 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rsl-5.0-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rsl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:02:05 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-ftp-client-3.14-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-ftp-client.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:02:49 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rsl-assist.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:02:12 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gass-transfer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:00:46 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-proxy-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:59:35 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-credential.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:59:11 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-sysconfig.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:59:23 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-callback.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:59:52 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-proxy-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 19:59:02 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Update to upstream update version - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO BW Limit Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:01:30 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-xio-popen-driver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||453847(gpt), 453848, ||453849, 453851 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:00:04 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-callout-0.7-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-callout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:03:03 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-usage-1.0-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-usage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:02:22 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-gass-copy-4.14-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-gass-copy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:03:12 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rls-client-5.1-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rls-client.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-15 20:03:20 EDT --- New version - Added s390x as 64 bit arch - Added comment documenting source - Adapt to changes in the globus-core package http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-rls-server-4.7-0.5.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-rls-server.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488010] Review Request: ibus-table-cangjie - Cang Jie input method for ibus-table.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-15 20:46:30 EDT --- cvs admin done; for reference: [[ Package Name: ibus-table-cangjie Short Description: Cangjie input method tables for ibus-table Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: i18n-team ]] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #18 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez nus...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-15 21:20:49 EDT --- Christian, Upstream bug report is this: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/blueman/+bug/337877 I updated the Spec to include the observations. I tried compiling using Koji, but got Policy Violation errors. Maybe I'm doing something wrong? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1242686 I also noticed that dist-f9 and dist-f10 appear to be locked... I wonder what that's about? I placed my Spec in the usual directory: Spec URL: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/blueman.spec It compiles, installs and works correctly in 32bit (x86) Fedora 10, tested in 2 laptops and 1 desktop. I'm not sure why I can't compile for F11... Thanks a lot for your time, I hope to get this packaged soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-15 21:30:28 EDT --- Hey Alex. I would be happy to review this and look at sponsoring you. Do you have any other reviews you have submitted? Any 'pre-reviews' of pending reviews to show you know the guidelines? Look for a full review of this package in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
