[Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 01:59:59 EDT --- python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 02:01:18 EDT --- python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-TraitsBackendQt-3.0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476310] Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476310 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-18 02:02:13 EDT --- Built in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247320 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476313] Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476313 Bug 476313 depends on bug 476310, which changed state. Bug 476310 Summary: Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476310 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476406] Review Request: sympow - Special Values of Symmetric Power Elliptic Curve L-Functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476406 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-18 01:59:48 EDT --- Built in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481695, which changed state. Bug 481695 Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481695] Review Request: python-TraitsBackendQt - PyQt backend for Traits and TraitsGUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481695 Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 02:02:18 EDT --- Imported and Submitted via Bidhi for stable releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490803] New: Review Request: emos - Interpolation software and GRIB, BUFR, CREX encoding/decoding routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emos - Interpolation software and GRIB, BUFR, CREX encoding/decoding routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490803 Summary: Review Request: emos - Interpolation software and GRIB, BUFR, CREX encoding/decoding routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kana...@kanarip.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/emos.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/emos-000360-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Interpolation library (EMOSLIB) includes Interpolation software and GRIB, BUFR, CREX encoding/decoding routines. It is used by the ECMWF meteorological archival and retrieval system (MARS) and also by the ECMWF graphics package Metview A few koji scratch builds: - dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247607 - dist-f10-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247610 - dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247615 This package does not build on ppc or ppc64, and is not a supported architecture by upstream (I've contacted them to explore our options on ppc* platforms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 02:43:25 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-03-18 03:14:30 EDT --- BuildRequires: qt-devel = 4.5.0 will not work, because it's missing the Epoch (i.e. 1:4.5.0). I recommend using BuildRequires: qt4-devel = 4.5.0 instead. (These virtual Provides have no Epoch.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-03-18 03:19:54 EDT --- And your License tag is incorrect. You claim it's LGPLv2+, it's actually LGPLv2 with exceptions. (They allow only version 2.1 and they have the same exception about inlines and templates as for Qt itself.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-03-18 03:28:27 EDT --- * BR: Yes, that's intentional. Currently, wx related plugins are not used (they are used by a program named rsgedit, but it is still not ready for production). I also didn't include them in rcssserver3d-0.6 package. And since wxGTK dependency is not desired for people who don't need wx related plugins, I think I would create a subpackage for them. Anyway, if you think that it is better to include them now, I will create a sub-package for them. * OK, will be fixed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 04:13:02 EDT --- All mono packages are arch currently, it is against the packaging guidelines to make them noarch. Such a move should be conditional on a change in the guidelines and then be done for all packages at once. Aside that I would love to see the plugins be moved into separate subpackages. e.g. gnome-do-plugins-evolution and so on in a natural fashion. It would be a great boon to our users. Also you don't need to pass libdir to configure, rpm should take care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #8 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-03-18 04:21:54 EDT --- SRPM: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/simspark_review/0.1-3/simspark-0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/simspark_review/0.1-3/simspark.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490491] Review Request: sysbench - System performance benchmark
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490491 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-03-18 05:06:51 EDT --- Imported and built for F-9, F-10, EL-4 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490520] Review Request: ioport - Access I/O ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:10:31
EDT ---
Thanks! That was quick. I will add the %{?dist} tag
to my local build so it'll go in when I import.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] New: Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ia.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ia-0.20050627-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Interlingua hyphenation rules as usable by OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478533] Review Request: hyphen-fr - French Hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478533 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:15:58 EDT --- Must have forgot to close this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490520] Review Request: ioport - Access I/O ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-03-18
04:49:41 EDT ---
OK Rpmlint must be run on every package.
OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file.
OK The spec file must be written in American English.
OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
5b76f5d5bcafa2dafb6001b9ac40a7e8
OK The package MUST successfully compile.
OK Correct BuildRequires.
OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.
OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review.
OK A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK Permissions on files must be set properly.
OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK Each package must consistently use macros.
OK The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
OK Header files must be in a -devel package.
OK Static libraries must be in a -static package.
OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'.
OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so
(without suffix) must go in -devel.
OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package.
OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file.
OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
In the spec is missing dist tag. Please add it before build.
ACCEPTED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:02:09 EDT --- The packaging guidelines contain what we agreed to ship: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Libraries_.28DLLs.29 What they do and whether they are necessary is covered here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues (Please expand the second link if you know definitive answers to any of those questions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:19:54 EDT --- I think the package needs to be updated now for i586 (ie to the latest cabal2spec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:17:50 EDT --- btanks-0.8.7686-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/btanks-0.8.7686-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757
--- Comment #13 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-03-18 05:42:44
EDT ---
Yes, I had -- sorry for answering late but there were indeed some things I had
to clarify with Peter (upstream).
First of all, the install target of cmake doesn't install all the binaries it
should -- there should be following files installed into %{_bindir}:
./_build/tools/divine-mc.compile-pml
./_build/tools/divine-mc.combine
./_build/tools/divine-mc
./_build/tools/divine-mc.probabilistic
./_build/tools/divine-mc.simulate
This can be fixed by adding the missing into tools/CMakeLists.txt:install(
TARGETS divine-mc divine-mc.simulate DESTINATION bin ).
And now the real problem: I found the official site of Promela, see
http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~michaelw/nips/ (please use the tarball from there
as Source1), and as there are several projects using Promela I had to
reconsider the decision of including Promela into divine-mc. Moreover, one
should quote here what the guidelines say:
Fedora packages should make every effort to avoid having multiple, separate,
upstream projects bundled together in a single package.
Well, unfortunately, this is now impossible. The jars are packed into one perl
script (divine-mc.compile-pml) and unpacked runtime. This is hard to bypass
without heavy code changes, but Peter agreed on making divine-mc independent on
Promela location in 2.0 version (upstream trac ticket placed under
http://anna.fi.muni.cz/divine/trac/ticket/14)
Would you agree on packaging Promela too (...I would review it) so that it
could be removed from divine-mc 2.0?
To sum it up:
* please fix the cmake install target, make sure that the Perl dependencies are
ok then, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides
* use upstreams tarball URL for Source1 (Promela), please add the link to the
trac ticket with the necessary explanation why it is not packaged separate now.
* regarding Java, the BR and R should be versioned, hence please use:
BuildRequires: java-devel = 1:1.6.0
BuildRequires: ant
Requires: java = 1:1.6.0
Requires: jpackage-utils
(BR: jpackage-utils is pulled by ant)
* regarding the following test:
# This one is omitted; it takes too long to be useful as a build test:
# ./_build/tools/divine-mc owcty examples/peterson-liveness.dve
You can surround this one with:
%if %{?_with_tests:1}%{!?_with_tests:0}
./_build/tools/divine-mc owcty examples/peterson-liveness.dve
%endif
so that one can run this test by passing --with tests to rpmbuild on demand.
* I would appreciate if you would submit the review request for Promela before
approving this package (the package and review shouldn't be problematic AFAIK).
I hope this is all...;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490491] Review Request: sysbench - System performance benchmark
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490491 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:46:36 EDT --- sysbench-0.4.10-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sysbench-0.4.10-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:46:38 EDT --- Try again :-), it wasn't working for me a minute or two ago, but it is now again. http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/iahyphen.html has http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/language/hyphenation/iahyphen.tex as primary which seems to work again, but in a pinch a secondary of ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/language/hyphenation/iahyphen.tex should work too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490835] New: Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490835 Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.grazi...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/oprofileui/oprofileui.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/oprofileui/oprofileui-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: OProfileUI is a user interface to the stochastic system profiler OProfile, providing application developers and system integrators with a graphical view of hotspots in their applications and systems. This should be considered very low priority as there seems to be some breakage in oprofile 0.9.4 (which this package requires) and kernel module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 05:23:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247881 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - unable to verify upstream source. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Source URL not working for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489751] Review Request: btanks - Funny battle game with tanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489751 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:18:19 EDT --- btanks-0.8.7686-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/btanks-0.8.7686-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490520] Review Request: ioport - Access I/O ports
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490520 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 05:15:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ioport Short Description: Access I/O ports Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-18 05:19:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) * BR: Yes, that's intentional. Currently, wx related plugins are not used (they are used by a program named rsgedit, but it is still not ready for production). I also didn't include them in rcssserver3d-0.6 package. And since wxGTK dependency is not desired for people who don't need wx related plugins, I think I would create a subpackage for them. In such case, explicitly disabling wxGTK support is recommended. Are there some option for cmake like --disable-wx?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490835] Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490835 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:51:10 EDT --- coccinelle-0.1.5-3.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/coccinelle-0.1.5-3.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 --- Comment #10 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-03-18 06:11:04 EDT --- No, there is no such options currently. It just considers wxWidgets as an optional part, so it won't build wx plugins when it doesn't exists. Do you think it is required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #38 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 06:11:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) I've uploaded a new package, if you want to check that I addressed you last points : It seem fixed. Consider adding spring and ca-installer to comps.xml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 06:10:28 EDT --- ocaml-pa-do-0.8.4-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490851] New: Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaum...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 484507,484509 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SystemInformation is a part of eZ Components : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/php-channel-ezc Provides access to common system variables, such as CPU type and speed, and the available amount of memory. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-SystemInformation.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint: buil...@enterprise ~ rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-ezc-SystemInformation * 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-+-+---+++ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-+-+---+++ | ./* | 5.0.0 | 0 | pcre | abstract | | | | || private| | | | || protected | | | | || public | | | | || throw | +-+-+---+++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 06:37:18 EDT --- spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 06:37:13 EDT --- spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 06:37:07 EDT --- spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 06:37:24 EDT --- spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-maps-default-0.1-4.fc10,spring-installer-20090316-3.fc10,springlobby-0.0.1.10429-4.fc10,spring-0.78.2.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490704(mingw32-liboil) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490704(mingw32-liboil) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||454410(mingw32-gcc), ||467402(mingw32-glib2) Alias||mingw32-liboil Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 06:42:32 EDT --- Please develop against Rawhide. All new packages should go into Rawhide first, even if they are intended to be used/backported in EPEL. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1248037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490491] Review Request: sysbench - System performance benchmark
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490491 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:46:42 EDT --- sysbench-0.4.10-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sysbench-0.4.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 06:47:05 EDT --- rpmlint is quiet, and package successfully builds in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #10 from Alex Orlandi nyr...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 06:49:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines [...cut..] Issues: 1. It's not entirely clear what the license should be here. ;) Some of the source files have: Copyright: See COPYING file that comes with this distribution which in fedora implies the License tag should be GPL+ SerialPort.cpp and SerialPort.h say GPLv2+ It's probibly best to talk to upstream and add a header to all the source files with their intended license. I talked to upstream that says: Thanks for pointing out the licensing issue. The original intention was to use GPLv2. I will fix the headers in the file as soon as I return so they are consistent with GPLv2. However, please feel free to patch the files for Fedora as you find fit to make them appear as distributed under GPLv2 2. Non blocker, but there are some doxygen warnings you might want to mention to upsteam: Warning: Tag `CGI_NAME' at line 573 of file doxygen.conf has become obsolete. To avoid this warning please update your configuration file using doxygen -u ...(and a few more) I'll try to patch it in the next spec file; in the meanwhile I notify the warnings to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(lfar...@lfarkas.o ||rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 06:57:48
EDT ---
+ rpmlint output
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
- spec file is legible
(see below)
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
11dd39b1ca13ce2e0618d4df8303f137 822195
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
n/a does not use Prefix: /usr
n/a package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
- packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
Optional:
n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
n/a scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
-
Couple of things:
(1) Please add your real name and email address in the first
%changelog description.
(2) The package must have:
Requires: pkgconfig
When you create a new package, bump the release number and
add a new changelog entry.
You can probably ignore comment 5, since the BuildRequires
look OK.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 07:32:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-ia Short Description: Interlingua hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 07:39:11 EDT --- grid-packaging-tools-3.2-16.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-16.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 07:39:01 EDT --- grid-packaging-tools-3.2-16.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-16.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490835] Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490835 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||panem...@gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 05:46:16 EDT --- unfortunately this package already exists in Fedora. see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7615 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/oprofileui You may like to check if package already exists at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ or in review at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html You can submit any other package of your interest but for now closing this as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489676] Review Request: perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader - Simple XML file reading based on their DTDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489676 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:48:46 EDT --- perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489676] Review Request: perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader - Simple XML file reading based on their DTDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489676 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:48:39 EDT --- perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Simple-DTDReader-0.04-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490849 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ber...@codewiz.org --- Comment #8 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2009-03-18 06:28:40 EDT --- Is this review stuck? I'm going to approve it in one week if nobody takes over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490835] Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490835 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 05:54:57 EDT --- whoos, my bad... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490867] Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490867 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||490865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490865] Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-03-18 07:47:42 EDT --- There is a license issue with this package (Artistic 1.0), but upstream has agreed to re-license to same terms as perl (GPL+ or Artistic). I've added the mail to the package in Source1 and pro-actively changed the license to get the review going. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490865] New: Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Date-Leapyear.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Date-Leapyear-1.71-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Date::Leapyear exports one function - isleap - which returns 1 or 0 if a year is leap, or not, respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490865] Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490832] Review Request: hyphen-ia - Interlingua hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490832 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 06:04:04 EDT --- verified source as 74a690f42bc1e31c430b90ce89173167 iahyphen.tex APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477320] Review Request: ocaml-p3l - OCaml compiler for parallel programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477320 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:50:34 EDT --- ocaml-p3l-2.03-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-p3l-2.03-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #9 from Alex Orlandi nyr...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 06:43:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Hey Alex. I would be happy to review this and look at sponsoring you. Do you have any other reviews you have submitted? Any 'pre-reviews' of pending reviews to show you know the guidelines? Hi Kevin, thank you for reviewing and for looking at sponsoring me. For now the only public package I've done is libserial, so I don't have any other pending review but I should have another one soon because I would like to submit an application. In the meanwhile I can make some informal pre-reviews of pending packages to give a clearer evidence fo the understanding of the guidelines; I will inform you of my informal pre-reviews asap. Thank you very much for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 06:46:35 EDT --- Auto-buildrequires is suggesting the following BuildRequires. Note the ones marked with '*' which I think should be added ... BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils = 2.19.1.4.fc11.x86_64 BuildRequires: mingw32-cpp = 4.4.0.0.6.fc11.x86_64 * BuildRequires: mingw32-dlfcn = 0.0.5.r11.fc11.noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = 49.3.fc11.noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-gcc = 4.4.0.0.6.fc11.x86_64 * BuildRequires: mingw32-gettext = 0.17.10.fc11.noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-glib2 = 2.19.10.1.fc11.noarch * BuildRequires: mingw32-iconv = 1.12.9.fc11.noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-runtime = 3.15.2.3.fc11.noarch BuildRequires: mingw32-w32api = 3.13.3.fc11.noarch * BuildRequires: pkgconfig = 1:0.23.8.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490849 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490835] Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490835 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 05:47:40 EDT --- I better mark this as DUPLICATE I guess of bug442233 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 442233 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490849] New: Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaum...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 484507,484509 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Archive is a part of eZ Components : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/php-channel-ezc The component allows you to create, modify, and extract archive files of various formats. The currently supported archives formats are Tar (with the flavours: ustar, v7, pax, and gnu) and Zip. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Archive.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Archive-1.3.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Archive-1.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint: buil...@enterprise ~ rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-ezc-Archive * 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-+-+---+++ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-+-+---+++ | ./* | 5.1.0 | 0 | bz2| abstract | | | | | date | implements | | | | | posix | private| | | | | zlib | protected | | | | || public | | | | || throw | +-+-+---+++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||490723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490867] New: Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490867 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Date-ICal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Date-ICal-1.72-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Date::ICal talks the ICal date format, and is intended to be a base class for other date/calendar modules that know about ICal time format also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido.grazi...@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 05:47:40 EDT --- *** Bug 490835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100
Pavel Lisý pavel.l...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.l...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from Pavel Lisý pavel.l...@gmail.com 2009-03-18 07:52:26 EDT
---
There is error in dependency:
in subpackage firebird-devel is:
Requires: libfbclient2
but nothing provides it, change it to:
Requires: %{name}-libfbclient2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-18 07:52:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #6) done http://ispbrasil.com.br/qtcreator/qt-creator.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/qtcreator/qt-creator-1.0.0-3.fc11.src.rpm koji -- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1248114 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490397] Review Request: gmime22 - Library for creating and parsing MIME messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490397 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: gmime22 - |compat-gmime - Library for |Library for creating and |creating and parsing MIME |parsing MIME messages |messages| --- Comment #17 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-03-18 08:03:25 EDT --- Changing the summary accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490397] Review Request: compat-gmime - Library for creating and parsing MIME messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490397 --- Comment #16 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-03-18 07:59:55 EDT --- OK, based on all of this, I recommend changing the basename of the package to gmime22 (as per bug #476243). Update the spec file, and I'll do a quick re-review, and the approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487713] Review Request: wcslib - An implementation of the FITS World Coordinate System standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487713 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] New: Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Summary: Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wo...@nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/jnettop/jnettop.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/jnettop/jnettop-0.13.0-2.src.rpm Description: Jnettop is visualising active network traffic as top does with processes. It displays active network streams sorted by bandwidth used. This is often usable when you want to get a fast grip of what is going on on your outbound router. The program is similar to iftop. Beats my would anyone use it instead of iftop, but several people recommended it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://jnettop.kubs.info/wi ||ki/ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-03-18 08:12:49 EDT --- koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1248109 #rpmlint -i /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/jnettop*rpm jnettop.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/jnettop-0.13.0/.jnettop The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The hidden file is intended to be like that. There is no system global config, users can copy or symlink to the bundled file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #32 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-18 08:28:16 EDT --- New development release of Relax and Recover (rear) is available: Development release 1.7.19 uploaded the latest files to the URLs mentioned below and also to the SourceForge file section of 1.7.19: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.noarch.rpm md5sums: 18e78dc738085c9fae3165898024e92d rear-1.7.19.tar.gz f744c1922a0beca391b54b4800556874 rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 9fd390b7fe6adb81a8b3d083baf03985 rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.src.rpm 6e4e83ca3e6f721f3b038837aefe6c81 rear.spec SourceForge pages of development version 1.7.19: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824release_id=669144 What changed in between? - man page removed from doc section - rpmbuild gzips the man page itself - thanks I wasn't aware of this feature. - updated the rear.spec file - made it better readable - the non-fedora directories under /usr/share/rear/build are related to the internals of rear itself as it is disaster recovery framework that supports Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, Gentoo, and so on. Please notice that there are also directories containing scripts to integrate with other (commercial) backups solutions such as TSM, Data Protector or NetBackup. We prefer to keep that at least intact with other distributions. Otherwise, we may come into conflicting situations that a fedora rpm doesn't work on RHEL for example. If you need more information on how rear works internally I would recommend to check out the concept guide (part of the doc section). - we have tested rear on 64-bit platforms (AMD, IA64) and the lib64 stuff you find under the skel directory are necessary (empty) directories where rear (in rescue mode) will copy files into (in the build area created for that purpose). All other necessary items (files, libraries) will be copied automatically by the rear mkrescue process. We have tested on fedora10 too. best regards - Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490865] Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-03-18 08:47:51 EDT --- Please include the license related email in this package's /usr/share/doc/.../ APPROVED, provided you add the email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490001] Review Request: mediawiki-semantic - The semantic extension to mediawiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490001 James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 08:49:53 EDT --- Thanks for review and cvsadmin assistance. This package is now build in the devel branch (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7968). Closing as NEXTRELEASE per Step#13 of the new package process (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484363] Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484363 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ggz-base-libs Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-18 09:01:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ggz-base-libs Short Description: Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone Owners: rdieter Branches: InitialCC: bpepple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480235] Review Request: subtitlecomposer - A text-based subtitles editor for KDE.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480235
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-03-18 09:09:04 EDT
---
Looking at
http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/subtitlecomposer
I don't see any scriptlets.
But I don't see any remaining problems or blockers, APPROVED.
Cosmetic items worth fixing before building:
1. icon scriptlets (see comment #3 for an example).
2. use kde4 macros like
%{_kde4_iconsdir} instead of %{_datadir}/icons
%{_kde4_appsdir} instead of %{_datadir}/kde4/apps
3. drop for KDE in summary/description. It should work just fine outside of
KDE.
4. Not sure if it's possible, but try to use a full URL for Source0. kde-apps
may make this difficult to do though. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT --- Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mno...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 09:24:00 EDT --- I can see this in Rawhide, can we close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 09:29:40 EDT --- Yes. It's now in Fedora 10 too: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1656 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mno...@redhat.com Bug 467420 depends on bug 467408, which changed state. Bug 467408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 09:32:24 EDT --- This looks here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94068 to be built for Rawhide but I am unable to reach it from my box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-18 09:34:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? Because it's simpler and FPC already decided the rpmlint warning about absolute symlinks was trashable. But they're ok not requiring our rpmlint packager to remove it and having people waste their time in reviews over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
