[Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-stomp - A python |python-stomper - A python |client implementation of|client implementation of |the STOMP protocol |the STOMP protocol --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 02:03:16 EDT --- * Updated name to better conform to Fedora naming standard * Changed define to global - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028#c1 SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-stomper-0.2.2-5.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-stomper/python-stomper.spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn207&r=207&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-stomper/python-stomper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #14 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 01:47:29 EDT --- Tiny update to change define to global - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028#c1 SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fabric-0.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn204&r=204&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490031] Review Request: pytyrant - A pure python client implementation of Tokyo Tyrant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490031 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: pytyrant - |python-tokyotyrant - A pure |A pure python client |python client |implementation of Tokyo |implementation of Tokyo |Tyrant |Tyrant | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: pytc - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: pytc - |python-tokyocabinet - |Python bindings for Tokyo |Python bindings for Tokyo |Cabinet |Cabinet | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490039] Review Request: pyftpdlib - Python FTP server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490039 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: pyftpdlib - |python-ftpdlib - Python FTP |Python FTP server library |server library | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490039] Review Request: python-ftpdlib - Python FTP server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490039 --- Comment #1 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 01:26:20 EDT --- SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/pyftpdlib-0.5.1-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/pyftpdlib/pyftpdlib.spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn201&r=201&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/pyftpdlib/pyftpdlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #11 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-03-27 01:18:20 EDT --- Just an observation: The emacs support files' packaging seems suspicious to me # rpm -qlp emacs-systemc-mode-1.310-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/systemc-mode.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/systemc-mode.el /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/systemc-mode.elc When comparing this to my FC10 installation: # rpm -qf /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp subversion-1.5.4-3.x86_64 libidn-0.6.14-8.x86_64 desktop-file-utils-0.15-3.fc10.x86_64 autoconf-2.63-1.fc10.noarch libidn-0.6.14-8.i386 rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc10.noarch cmake-2.6.3-3.fc10.x86_64 ... # rpm -qf /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc10.noarch ... I am inclined to think, directory ownerships aren't handled correctly. You likely need to own these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490031] Review Request: python-tokyotyrant - A pure python client implementation of Tokyo Tyrant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490031 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 00:59:44 EDT --- Thanks again. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/pytyrant-1.1.17-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/pytyrant/pytyrant.spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn197&old=191&r=197&format=side&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fprojects%2Fpackages%2Frpms%2Fpytyrant%2Fpytyrant.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: python-tokyocabinet - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 00:49:54 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru! SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/pytc-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/pytc/pytc.spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn192&r=192&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/pytc/pytc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 --- Comment #6 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-03-27 00:32:08 EDT --- http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi-1.1.0.20090327-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 --- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-03-27 00:06:51 EDT --- Ad per discussion, wubi98 is removed. Please proceed package review: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi.spec http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi-1.1.0.20090316-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #18 from Joseph Smidt 2009-03-26 23:21:53 EDT --- Here are the new packages: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-4.fc10.src.rpm This version deals with the below comments: > any later version." Perhaps it's worth clarifying with upstream if this should > be > GPLv3 or GPLv3+ Done. > > Should that be mode 755? Done > 3. We may want to think about removing the non free tests here. > Since they download non free software, I'm not sure thats something we > want to encourage or allow. I guess it's a gray area, but I thought I would > bring it up for more discussion. I have included a README.Fedora to clear up how to distinguish between non-free and free tests with as additional statement that Fedora only advocates Free software. > 4. I think we should look at handling the deps and downloads a better way. As you saw above upstream needs many of these packages to be precise versions. I also believe in order to do proper comparisons across different systems it may be best to leave things how they are. Feel free to tell me if you disagree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490867] Review Request: perl-Date-ICal - Perl extension for ICalendar date objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490867 Bug 490867 depends on bug 490865, which changed state. Bug 490865 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490865] Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490865 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-03-26 22:03:25 EDT --- hmm, this should have been closed when the packages were pushed to stable... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492501] New: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: plo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libtiff.spec SRPM URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.src.rpm Hi! I just finished writing the mingw32 libtiff spec file. I used http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libtiff/devel/libtiff.spec?revision=1.53&view=markup as the basis for this spec file. For your convenience, here is the patch file between the original and my spec: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/libtiff.patch . Some specific questions: Should I keep the "%define LIBVER..." part? Is the multilib hack relevant for mingw cross-compiling libraries? Should I just remove it? I suspect that tiffgt, sgti2tiff and tiffsv don't build unless relevant libraries are available. Should I keep the commands which delete those executables? Currently, I commented them out. Description: The libtiff package contains a library of functions for manipulating TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) image format files. TIFF is a widely used file format for bitmapped images. TIFF files usually end in the .tif extension and they are often quite large. The libtiff package should be installed if you need to manipulate TIFF format image files Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffvers.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.hxx mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiff.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf-64.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jussi.leht...@iki ||.fi) --- Comment #11 from John W. Linville 2009-03-26 21:52:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/unzoo.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/unzoo-4.4-4.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Mar 26 2009 John W. Linville - 4.4-4 - Copy source to build directory so it is included in debuginfo rpm2cpio ../RPMS/x86_64/unzoo-debuginfo-4.4-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm | cpio -idt ./usr/lib/debug ./usr/lib/debug/.build-id ./usr/lib/debug/.build-id/73 ./usr/lib/debug/.build-id/73/6e399c036b54a296e1fd08e41012249eeb9053 ./usr/lib/debug/.build-id/73/6e399c036b54a296e1fd08e41012249eeb9053.debug ./usr/lib/debug/usr ./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin ./usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/unzoo.debug ./usr/src/debug/unzoo-4.4 ./usr/src/debug/unzoo-4.4/unzoo.c 311 blocks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Patrick Dignan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm | |ail.com)| --- Comment #21 from Patrick Dignan 2009-03-26 21:45:27 EDT --- Pong. I thought Dale wanted to pick up the packaging for this? If not I'll try to finish it up soon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #17 from Joseph Smidt 2009-03-26 21:14:51 EDT --- > 3. We may want to think about removing the non free tests here. > Since they download non free software, I'm not sure thats something we > want to encourage or allow. I guess it's a gray area, but I thought I would > bring it up for more discussion. Given the upstream author's above comments, would a README explaining the free/nonfree tests and how to distinguish them suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #16 from Michael Larabel 2009-03-26 20:56:01 EDT --- 1. GPLv3+ is fine. 2. It can be 755 though doesn't need to be for it to work properly. Though in the Git code and in the soon to be released version of PTS 1.8, it is made executable just so it won't emit that potential problem. 3. To find all of the non free software tests, run: phoronix-test-suite list-tests and then at the end of each line it should say FREE, RESTRICTED, RETAIL, or NON-FREE. The overwhelming majority of the tests are free / open-source. In the future we may also split the phoronix-test-suite upstream package into pts and pts-core/ where pts-core is our testing engine and where pts would just contain the different test profiles, etc. This may make it easier for your purposes of stripping out non-free tests in the future. 4. The reason that some files are downloaded and not fetched via the distribution's package management system is to ensure better validity of the test results. If just relying upon the distribution-supplied packages, we cannot ensure the generated test results are comparable to other systems / distributions. Different distributions may ship with slightly minor versions, incorporate extra patches, build the software with different optimizations, etc. That is why the main test files aren't fetched using the package management system, since it could lead to unreliable results so we try to reduce the number of variables at play. Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-26 20:33:21 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7d53151838aba7a6d3b498dea5973c3d phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0.tar.gz 7d53151838aba7a6d3b498dea5973c3d phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. The documentation says the license is GPLv3, but many of the headers of the source files say "either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." Perhaps it's worth clarifying with upstream if this should be GPLv3 or GPLv3+ 2. rpmlint says: phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/phoronix-test-suite/pts-core/modules/dummy_script_module.sh 0644 Should that be mode 755? phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: devel-dependency SDL-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency compat-libstdc++-33 phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXv-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXvMC-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng-devel I think we can ignore those here, as this is a odd case. 3. We may want to think about removing the non free tests here. Since they download non free software, I'm not sure thats something we want to encourage or allow. I guess it's a gray area, but I thought I would bring it up for more discussion. 4. I think we should look at handling the deps and downloads a better way. For example, nexuiz gets downloaded and installed locally, even though it's available in fedora. Would it be possible to patch things and get it to use 'yum install' or 'pk-con install' to install Fedora packages of dependencies and then use the fedora packaged versions? That could be used to remove all the devel deps as well until needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@fc.up.pt --- Comment #14 from José Matos 2009-03-26 20:11:38 EDT --- I have sponsored Joseph so the initial message is outdated. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #64 from Michael Hideo 2009-03-26 20:11:01 EDT --- Thanks, Spot, That makes sense! I can see how it all coalesces and fits together in my head. Eric, do you want to draft a policy for submission or would you like me to do it. I can have it done by Monday for your review if you like. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt 2009-03-26 20:00:05 EDT --- Since starting this bug report I successfully packaged Scitools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 and have reviewed: 1. Grnotify: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 2. Marlin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 3. Pygrace: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-26 19:44:04 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here. :( Look for a full review later tonight. Did you have any other packages you wanted to submit? Or have you done any pre-reviews of other packages pending review to show you know the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-26 19:12:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: qt-creator Short Description: Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt Owners: itamarjp Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #63 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-03-26 18:27:37 EDT --- I'm assuming you're referring to Toshio's statement that: "Another option is to look at a streamlined set of review items for publican-created doc packages... We've never explicitly done this but in practice, people know they don't have to check, for instance, shared library guidelines when writing and reviewing a pure python module." Someone would first need to propose what the specific set of review items for publican-created doc packages should be. The way to do this is to create a wiki page under: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ Once that is done, then add a link to the new page to the todo list for the Fedora Packaging Committee (FPC) by editing the table here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo The FPC meets once every two weeks, and is scheduled to meet next Tuesday. If the FPC approves it, it will go to the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) for ratification. Once they ratify, then you could start opening publican doc packages for review under the new guidelines. Hope that helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #11 from Michael Larabel 2009-03-26 18:19:01 EDT --- Hi Joseph, >From a quick look at your latest packages, they look fine from the PTS side of it. Michael Larabel [ Lead Developer of the Phoronix Test Suite ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] New: Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Summary: Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0...@mkdir.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/razertool-0.0.7/razertool-0.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: RazerTool is an unofficial tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice in Linux. It has both command-line and gtk+-2.x versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #2 from Zarko 2009-03-26 17:16:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I have changed the depends on this report as photoprint-borders depends on > photoprint. > > > You will need to add this to the spec file > > Requires: photoprint Well done. Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/photoprint-borders.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #11 from Zarko 2009-03-26 17:14:53 EDT --- OK, I removed this, but I did not change revision number... Here are the files: Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/photoprint.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/photoprint-0.4.0-4.fc10.src.rpm I'll suggest author of the source that he import these borders to main source file, because they do not have sense without PhotoPrint itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-03-26 17:10:59 EDT --- I don't particularly care about this project, but it was bundled with websvn which I submitted too, so I packaged it. My understanding of the guidelines is we don't want any private copy of anything bundled into another package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Gianluca Sforna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-03-26 16:25:13 EDT --- Uhm... this project seems dead (no releases since 2004, forum infested by spam, etc). Are you sure you want to maintain it in Fedora? Looks like you will become upstream for it, and there are several alternatives out there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Robert Spanton changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Robert Spanton 2009-03-26 16:19:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: msp430-gcc Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at msp430 Owners: rspanton Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Gianluca Sforna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gia...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-03-26 15:53:34 EDT --- a couple comments: looking at the geshi.php file license should be GPLv2+ according to yum deplist php, php-common is a dependency so you can just list php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #22 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-03-26 15:46:44 EDT --- libparrot.so is not a symlink because with make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT a perl script will be executed that copy from BUILD (blib/lib/) to BUILDROOT but did not care about that libparrot.so is a symlink. A workaround can be done in the spec file (I tried). I think it is better the Parrot community will patch the source in the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-03-26 15:35:13 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clipsmm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rvinyard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 nucleo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: netstat-nat |Review Request: netstat-nat |- A tool that display NAT |- A tool that displays NAT |connections |connections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #16 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-03-26 14:18:32 EDT --- There is an error in desktopfile : screenlets-manager > /dev/null and not : "screenlets-manager > /dev/null" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644
--- Comment #15 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-03-26
14:13:33 EDT ---
buil...@enterprise ~> rpmlint -vi rpmbuild/**/screenlets*{rpm,spec}
screenlets.noarch: I: checking
screenlets.src: I: checking
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-26 13:59:55 EDT --- Closing the bug. I opened a new one at bug 492398. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 491421 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492398] Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gr...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-26 14:01:51 EDT --- *** Bug 470914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-26 14:01:51 EDT --- Sorry put the wrong number. The correct one is this one: *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 492398 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] New: Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Summary: Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-feedcreator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-feedcreator-1.7.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: FeedCreator.class.php provides an easy way to create RSS feeds from within PHP using ease to use classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||492395, 492396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492398] New: Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492398 Summary: Review Request: slv2 - LV2 host library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/slv2.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/slv2-0.6.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SLV2 is a library to make the use of LV2 plugins as simple as possible for applications. It is written in standard C using the Redland RDF toolkit. The Data (RDF) and code (shared library) functionality in SLV2 is strictly separated so it is simple to control where each is used (e.g. it is possible to discover/investigate plugins and related data without loading any shared libraries, avoiding the associated risks). rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] New: Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Summary: Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/websvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/websvn-2.1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: WebSVN offers a view onto your subversion repositories that's been designed to reflect the Subversion methodology. You can view the log of any file or directory and see a list of all the files changed, added or deleted in any given revision. You can also view the differences between two versions of a file so as to see exactly what was changed in a particular revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492395] New: Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Summary: Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-geshi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-geshi-1.0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: GeSHi aims to be a simple but powerful highlighting class, with the following goals: * Support for a wide range of popular languages * Easy to add a new language for highlighting * Highly customisable output formats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] New: Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that display NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that display NAT connections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 Summary: Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that display NAT connections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekc...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/netstat-nat/netstat-nat.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/netstat-nat/netstat-nat-1.4.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Netstat-nat is a small program written in C. It displays NAT connections, managed by netfilter/iptables which comes with the > 2.4.x linux kernels. The program reads its information from '/proc/net/nf_conntrack', which is the temporary conntrack-storage of netfilter. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259830 rpmlint: 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(jussi.leht...@iki |
|.fi)|
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-26 13:19:15
EDT ---
rpmlint output is now clean, however the debuginfo package is not complete: the
source code is missing from it.
Copy the source file to the build directory, then the source code is included
in debuginfo. Your setup and build phases should like the following:
%setup -Tc -n %{name}-%{version}
cp -a %{SOURCE0} .
cat unzoo.c | sed -e '/SYNTAX/,/\*\//!d' | cut -c5- > unzoo.txt
%build
gcc %{optflags} -o unzoo -DSYS_IS_UNIX unzoo.c
PS. Don't put the dist tag in the changelog, since you can use the same spec to
build on any Fedora/RHEL release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2009-03-26 13:35:22 EDT --- The package doesn't need Requires: photoprint-borders so please remove it, photoprint works without it. Just a thought you could add the borders to the photoprint package i.e combine them . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Owen Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Owen Taylor 2009-03-26 13:32:33 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0 imported and built for F-9, F-10, devel. Update requests submitted for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 13:30:02 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0-3 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/reinteract-0.5.0-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 13:28:36 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0-2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/reinteract-0.5.0-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #11 from Matt Domsch 2009-03-26 13:18:16 EDT --- Gotcha. Applied those changes, thanks! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259897 built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2009-03-26 13:12:24 EDT --- I have changed the depends on this report as photoprint-borders depends on photoprint. You will need to add this to the spec file Requires: photoprint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@googlemail.co ||m Depends on||491128 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(jussi.leht...@iki ||.fi) --- Comment #9 from John W. Linville 2009-03-26 12:56:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/unzoo.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/unzoo-4.4-3.fc10.src.rpm * Thu Mar 26 2009 John W. Linville - 4.4-3.fc10 - Use setup macro in prep phase (cleaner spec, generates debuginfo) - Add release info in changelog rpmlint output: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I was doing some setup manually, since a bare %setup doesn't grok a single .c file. Digging-up the right options for %setup not only cleans-up the .spec file but also generates the debuginfo package. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|492266 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|491128 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-26 12:58:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336850) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336850) patch to build in koji look -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch 2009-03-26 12:52:42 EDT --- Itamar: re no dist tag: the executables being produced run in BIOS context, not OS distribution context. There's no reason we couldn't use the same noarch (x86) executables across multiple OS versions. Koji scratch-build started: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 12:30:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > ping? What does it mean? It means that I am waiting for your another review request. > I want to write a new review request for shutter. But the problem is that I > can > build a package for shutter's dependencies but I can not install them in > Fedora > Rawhide because of lack of dependencies. However I can install them in Fedora > 10. I have waited for a long time but the problem is not be solved. I am just > still waiting. I don't catch what issue you are seeing correctly, however - If there are other dependeny packages needed for shutter and not available on Fedora, you also have to submit review requests for those packages - Generally speaking it is not always possible to install packages rebuilt on F-10 system into F-11 system - If there are some bugs on packages in Fedora which prevents shutter from being installed, you have to file a bug against that component. Just waiting won't solve the problem > My Fedora 10 broke down just now. The reason I guess is new NetworkManager > erase all the things in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-applet.conf after I upgrade my > system from fedora updates repository not updates-testing repository. And > then, > all things related to dbus(messagebus service) broke down. So I restart my > system. But I can not log in GNOME again. But I can use CLI mode. - I am rawhide user, don't use NetworkManager at all, however did you try to downgrade NetworkManager? (If you want to downgrade NetworkManager, visit: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=335 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #24 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-03-26 12:25:55 EDT --- New Releases: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.18.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-26
12:27:16 EDT ---
Can you include a koji scratch build in dist-f11 ?
-make %{?_smp_mflags}
+make %{?_smp_mflags} ISOLINUX_BIN=/usr/share/syslinux/isolinux.bin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-26 12:25:04 EDT --- why you don't include dist-tag ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch 2009-03-26 12:01:48 EDT --- And a few more updates: * add subpackage gpxe-bootimgs containing ISO, USB, and floppy images * add BRs needed for generating the above images * add USAGE doc for above images * change Source0 to point at released tarballs, not git Built in mock, logs and results at http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Liang Suilong changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(liangsuil...@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #37 from Liang Suilong 2009-03-26 11:58:36 EDT --- ping? What does it mean? Should I send something about iptux to you" I want to write a new review request for shutter. But the problem is that I can build a package for shutter's dependencies but I can not install them in Fedora Rawhide because of lack of dependencies. However I can install them in Fedora 10. I have waited for a long time but the problem is not be solved. I am just still waiting. My Fedora 10 broke down just now. The reason I guess is new NetworkManager erase all the things in /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-applet.conf after I upgrade my system from fedora updates repository not updates-testing repository. And then, all things related to dbus(messagebus service) broke down. So I restart my system. But I can not log in GNOME again. But I can use CLI mode. I hope the maintainer of NetworkManager will fix the bug soon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state. Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492250] Review Request: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch - Patch CPAN modules using Git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492250 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-03-26 11:01:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch Short Description: Patch CPAN modules using Git Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492250] Review Request: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch - Patch CPAN modules using Git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492250 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488910] Review Request: bio2jack - A library for porting blocked io(OSS/ALSA) applications to jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488910 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:53:52 EDT --- bio2jack-0.9-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488910] Review Request: bio2jack - A library for porting blocked io(OSS/ALSA) applications to jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488910 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:56:14 EDT --- bio2jack-0.9-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488910] Review Request: bio2jack - A library for porting blocked io(OSS/ALSA) applications to jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488910 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.9-3.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489130] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489130 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.8.1-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489026] Review Request: auto-buildrequires - Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:52:48 EDT --- auto-buildrequires-1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488910] Review Request: bio2jack - A library for porting blocked io(OSS/ALSA) applications to jack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488910 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.9-3.fc10 |0.9-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489130] Review Request: gnome-guitar - A small suite of applications for the guitarist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489130 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:54:25 EDT --- gnome-guitar-0.8.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489026] Review Request: auto-buildrequires - Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-26 10:52:19 EDT --- auto-buildrequires-1.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489026] Review Request: auto-buildrequires - Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0-3.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489026] Review Request: auto-buildrequires - Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-3.fc10 |1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:44:10 EDT --- Taking this review request. kanarip, would you update your srpm? Note that now for rubygems containing C codes to compile, packaging guidelines changed since this review request is submitted, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C Examples are useful: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-hpricot/devel/rubygem-hpricot.spec?view=co http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-nokogiri/devel/rubygem-nokogiri.spec?view=co By the way I appreciate it if you would review my review request (bug 492171) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #24 from Philippe Makowski 2009-03-26 10:38:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > But I'm not a member of Fedora team, so ... > > please join fedora. ;) If I can find time for it would be a pleasure ... > > Please Fedora members,review it. > > Peter Lemenkov is alrealy reviewing it, when the package and spec file is in a > good shape then it will be approved. ok to Peter Lemenkov : again feel free to contact me if any thing need related to Firebird after that we could package Flamerobin and also the Python driver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:31:02 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm ||ail.com) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:25:42 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(br...@gnoll.org) --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:23:54 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(stu...@gathman.or ||g) --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:24:46 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(t...@d5k.net) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:25:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(liangsuil...@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:23:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:22:33 EDT --- Sorry for late reply. (In reply to comment #24) > I'll explain my plan a little further because it may be a little > controversial. > > Since this package is a little hard to package (with or without > mod_passenger), > I was thinking I could ship rubygem-passenger, and out-comment all the parts > that have to do with mod_passenger (and thus not ship, compile or include > mod_passenger itself, just the .spec semantics, out-commented). That way, > downstream users that want mod_passenger can derive from the .spec and .srpm > already in Fedora. > > However, my primary concern is that we would be shipping an intolerable SRPM > (since the conflicting licenses prevent the sources from being shipped > together > as one). > > Could you let me know what you think? Thanks! I don't think we can provide srpm which cannot build within Fedora's policy and which needs fixing to compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(alexes...@yahoo.c ||om) --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 10:19:03 EDT --- If my patch won't work on F-9, for now you can just ignore it because my patch is just to suppress warnings. By the way I am still waiting your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 491421, which changed state. Bug 491421 Summary: fluid soundfont transition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491421 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471509] Review Request: extjs - Ext JS is a cross-browser JavaScript library for building rich internet applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471509 Chris Tyler changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #62 from Michael Hideo 2009-03-26 09:00:04 EDT --- Hi Spot, I am not sure of the process, but i think we have a breakthrough here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-March/msg00153.html I think we have what could be seen as a waiver on the two issues but i don't know the process to follow through. Can you help navigate that? Cheers, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491892] Review Request: openscap - Set of open source libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491892 Daniel Kopeček changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||dkope...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dkope...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-26 08:08:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Are you going to delay updating the spec until the new version is released? > > > > no, I've fixed other problems and based on the emails the license in spec is > correct, so I think there is no need to wait for new version Okay; the CVS spec changelog just didn't have any mention of the fixes made. - Character set conversion is unsafe and loses time stamp. Change to: iconv -f iso-8859-2 -t utf-8 CHANGES > CHANGES.tmp && \ touch -r CHANGES CHANGES.tmp && mv CHANGES.tmp CHANGES Fix this and build package in rawhide, then I can review the package (I can get the srpm from koji). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
